IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FCiR THE …
Transcript of IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FCiR THE …
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FCiR THE LI~TTi~'ICT ~v'i T~Ei.,AWAP~
In re: ) Chapter 11
KONA GRILL, INC., et al.,l ) Case No.: 19-10953 (CSS)(Jointly Administered)
Debtors. )Ike: Docket Nos. 8 and 40
Objection Deadline: May 21, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET)
Hearing Date: May 28, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. (ET)
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DEBTORS' MOTION FOR INTERIM AND FINAL ORDER
UNDER SECTIONS 105, 345, 363, 364, 503, 1107 AND 1108 OF THE BANKRUPTCY
CODE AUTHORIZING (I) MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS;
(II) CONTINiJANCE OF EXISTII~IG CASH MAl~TAGEMENT SYSTEM, BANK
ACCOUNTS, CHECKS AND RELATED FORMS; (III) CONTINUED
PERFORMANCE OF INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS; (IV) LIMITED
V4~AIVER OF SECTION 345(b) DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT
REQUIREMENTS AND (V) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
TO: (a) the Office of the United States Trustee; (b) Key Bank National Association and Zions
Bank, (c) parties asserting liens against the Debtors' assets, (d) the Debtors' thirty largest
unsecured creditors on a consolidated basis; (e) the Banks; and (f j any party requesting
special notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Apri130, 2019, the above-captioned debtors
and debtors in possession (collectively, the "Debtors"), each filed a voluntary petition for relief
under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code with the Clerk of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Bankruptcy Court").
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Debtors filed the Debtors'
Motion for Interim and Final Order Under Sections 105, 345, 363, 364, 503, 1107 and 1108 of
the Bankruptcy Code Authorizing (I) Maintenance of Existing Bank Accounts; (II) Continuance
' The Debtors and the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers include: Kona Grill, Inc.
(6690); Kona Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (6703); Kona Sushi, Inc. (4253); Kona Macadamia, Inc. (2438); Kona
Texas Restaurants, Inc. (4089); Kona Grill International Holdings, Inc. (1841); Kona Baltimore, Inc. (9163); Kona
Grill International, Inc. (7911); and Kona Grill Puerto Rico, Inc. (7641). The headquarters and service address for
the above-captioned Debtors is 15059 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254.
DOCS DE223664.1 50045/002
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67 Filed 05/02/19 Page 1 of 4
of Existing Cash Management System, Bank Accounts, Checks and Related Forrns; (III)
~antinued 1'e~form~nce cif Interc~snpany Transactirns; (I~) Li~~aite~ Waive; ~f Section 345(b)
Deposit and Investment Requirements and (V) GNanting Related Relief (the "Motion") [Docket
No. 8] with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 Market Street,
3rd Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (the "Bankruptcy Court"). A copy of the Motion is
attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Debtors presented certain first-
day motions at a hearing before the Honorable Christopher S. Sontchi at the Bankruptcy Court
on May 2, 2019. The Bankruptcy Court granted interim relief on the Motion and entered the
InteNim Order Unc~eN Sections 105, 345, 363, 364, 503, 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code
Authorizing (I) Maintenance of Existing Bank Accounts; (II) Continuance of Existing Cash
Management System, Bank Accounts, Checks and Related FoNfns; (III) Continued Performance
of Intercompany Transactions; (IV) Limited WaiveN of Section 345(b) Deposit and Investment
Requirements and (V) Granting Related Relief (the "Interim Order") [Docket No. 40], attached
hereto as Exhibit 2.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that any response or objection to the
entry of a final order with respect to the relief sought in the Motion must be filed with the
Bankruptcy Court on or before May 21, 2019 at 4:00 p.m. prevailing Eastern Tiine.
PLEASE TAKE I~ URTHER NOTICE that at the same time, you must also
serve a copy of the response or objection upon: (i) the Debtors, Kona Grill, Inc., 15059 N.
Scottsdale Rd., Suite 300, Scottsdale, AZ 85254, Attn: Christopher J. Wells; (ii) proposed
counsel for the Debtors, Pachulski Stang Ziehl &Jones LLP, 919 N. Market Street, 17th Floor,
Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: James E. O'Neill (ioneill cr,pszjlaw.com); (iii) counsel to any
2DOCS DE223664.1 50045/002
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67 Filed 05/02/19 Page 2 of 4
statutory committee appointed in these cases; (iv) counsel for the Debtors' prepetition and
postpetitian secured l~r~ders, Buchanan Ingersoll ~i Rooney P~, 919 North Market Street,
Suite 990, Wilmington, DE 19801-1054 Attn: Mary F. Caloway, (mary.calowav cr,bipe.com);
and (v) the Office of The United States Trustee, Attn: Jaclyn Weissgerber,
(jaclyn.weiss er~nusdoj.~), 844 King Street, Suite 2207, Lockbox 35, Wilmington,
Delaware 19801.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE FINAL RELIEF
REQUESTED BY THE MOTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OR HEARING.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT A HEARING TO CONSIDER
THE FINAL RELIEF SOUGHT IN THE MOTION WILL BE HELD ON MAY 28, 2019 AT
1:00 P.M. PREVAILING EASTERN TIME BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER
S. SONTCHI, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT JUDGE, AT THE UNITED
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
DOCS DE223664.1 50045/002
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67 Filed 05/02/19 Page 3 of 4
STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE, 824 MARKET
STREET, 5TH FLOQR, C~TJRTR~~M NG~. 6, W?LMINCTOTl, nELA V~ARE 19801.
I~at~d: Niay 2, 2G i 9
PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL &JONES LLP
/s/James E. O'NeillJeremy V. Richards (CA Bar No. 102300)James E. O'Neill (DE Bar No. 4042)John W. Lucas (CA Bar No. 271038)919 N. Market Street, 17th FloorP.O. Box 8705Wilmington, DE 19899-8705 (Courier 19801)Telephone: (302) 652-4100Facsimile: (302) 652-4400E-mail: [email protected]
[email protected] Lucas@pszj law. com
PNoposed Attorneys foN DebtoNs and Debtors inPossession
4DOGS UE:223664.1 50045/002
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67 Filed 05/02/19 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
In re:
KONA GRILL, INC., et al., l
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Debtors. )
~hapier i i
Case No.: 19-10953 (__)Joint Administration Requested
DEBTORS' MOTON FOR INTERIM AND FINAL ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 105,
345, 363, 364, 503, 1107 AND 1108 OF THE BAN~~RUPTCY CODE AUTHORIZING (I)
MAINTENANCE OF EXIS'T'ING BANK ACCOUNTS; (II) CONTINUANCE OF
EXISTING CASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, BANK ACCOUNTS, CHECKS AND
RELATED FORMS; (III) CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF INTERCOMPANY
TRANSACTIONS; (IV) LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 345(b) DEPOSIT AND
INVESTl~'IENT REQUIREIVIENTS AND (V) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (the "Debtors" or
"Company") hereby file this motion (the "Motion") for the entry of an interim and final order,
pursuant to sections 105, 345, 364, 363, 503, 1107, and 1108 of Title 11 of the United States Code
(the "Bankruptcy Code"), authorizing: (i) the maintenance of existing bank accounts, including
the authority to pay routine prepetition banking fees owed to financial institutions; (ii) the
continued use of the Company's existing cash management system, bank accounts, and checks
(the "Cash Management System"); (iii) the continued performance of intercompany transactions
("Intercompany Transactions"); (iv) a limited waiver of the deposit and investment requirements
i The Debtors and the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers include: Kona Grill, Inc.
(6690); Kona Restaurant Holdings, I~lc. (6703); Kona Sushi, Inc. (4253); Kona Macadamia, Inc. (2438); Kona Texas
Restaurants, Inc. (4089); Kona Grill International Holdings, Inc. (1841); Kona Baltimore, Inc. (9163); Kona Grill
International, I:~~. (7°11); and Kona Grill Puerto Rico, Inc. (7641). The headquarters and service address for the
above-captioned Debtors is 15059 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254.
~~~~~ p~_DOCS_LA:320608.7 ~~-~~ ~W ~ Nt ,.., [m~`'
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 2 of 41
imposed under section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy; and (v) granting related relief. In support of the
Motion, the Debtors respectfully represent as follows:
JURISDICTION AloTD VENUE
1. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the
"Court") has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Amended
Standing D~deN of Reference from the United States District Court fog the District of DelawaNe,
dated February 29, 2012. This matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
§ 157(b)(2), and the Debtors confirm their consent pursuant to Rule 9013-1(~ of the Local Rules
of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware (the "Local Rules") to the entry of a final order by the Court in connection with this
Motion to the extent that it is later determined that the Court, absent consent of the parties, cannot
enter final orders or judgments in connection herewith consistent with Article III of the United
States Constitution.
2. The statutory bases for the relief sought in this Motion are sections 105,
345, 363, 364, 503, 1107, and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code; Rules 6003, 6004, and 9013 of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the ̀ Bankruptcy Rules"); and Local Rule 9013-1(~.
Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.
BACKGROUND
A. The Chapter 11 Cases
3. On the date hereof (the "Petition Date"), the Debtors commenced these
chapter 11 cases by filing voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
The Debtors have continued in the possession of their property and have continued to operate and
2ROCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 3 of 41
manage their business as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the
~anl~ry_ptcy Cocl_e: No truste~5 ~~aminer5 or comz~aittee has been appointed in the these chapter 11
~Y_~.Y:I.91
4. The factual background regarding the Debtors, including their current and
historical business operations and the events leading up to the commencement of these chapter 11
cases, is set forth in detail in the Declaration of Ch~istophe~ J. Wells in Support of FiNst Day
Pleadings (the "First Day Declaration") filed concurrently herewith and fully incorporated herein
by reference.
B. The Cash Management System and Bank Accounts
5. The Company's Cash Management System facilitates the timely and
efficient collection, management, and disbursement of funds used in the Debtors' business. The
Cash Management System currently consists of, as more fully outlined below, three primary bank
accounts and 38 linked depository sub-accounts, all located at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Faro").Z A list of the Company's bank accounts (collectively, the "Bank Accounts") is set forth
on Exhibit A annexed hereto. A schematic diagram of the Cash Management System is annexed
hereto as Exhibit B.
6. As more fully explained below, the Cash Management System is designed
to effectuate the collection of revenue from customers, pay operating expenses, and maintain
payroll obligations. Any disruption to the Cash Management System would jeopardize the
Company's ability to timely satisfy postpetition obligations.
2 Tha Company is in the process of closing certain restaurant locations. To the extent sub-accounts relating to these
restaurants are no longer necessary, the Debtors request authority to close such sub-accounts without further order
of the Court.
3DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 4 of 41
The Operating Account
7. The Debtors maintain an operating account (Account No. 9811, the
"Operating Account") at Wells Fargo. The Operating Account is utilized for both receipts and
disbursements. The approximate balance in the Operating Account as of the Petition Date is $1.2
million.
8. The Company typically makes the following deposits to the Operating
Account:
• Restaurant Cash, Deposits: Each sub-account is maintained for aseparate restaurant location. Cash deposits from the restaurants aretransported on a weekly basis to and deposited into the applicable sub-account at a Wells Fargo branch by armored car. Deposits are
automatically swept from the sub-accounts to the Operating Accountsuch that the end of day balance of the sub-accounts is always $0.
• Credit Card Deposits: Credit card deposits (collectively the "Credit
Card Deposits") in the United States are received from (a} American
Express and (b) Total Systems Services, Inc. ("TSYS"). Credit card
deposits in Puerto Rico are received from Global Payments Inc.("Global Payments"). The Credit Card Deposits are made by the
applicable credit card processor directly into the Operating Account.
• Other Deposits: Checks may be received at the Company's corporate
office for vendor rebates, refunds, and for other miscellaneous reasons.
These checks are logged by the Senior Accountant into a summary
journal entry when received. The physical checks are stored in a lockeddrawer until deposited. The checks are deposited in~a the Operating
Account either electronically or at a physical Wells Fargo branch
location. In addition, the Debtors receive Automated Clearing House
("ACH") deposits from other vendors or consumers that are deposited
into the Operating Account.
9. As discussed above, the Company also utilizes the Operating Account as a
centralized disbursement account. Specifically, the Company uses the Operating Account to fund
the zero-balance payroll and accounts payable accounts, as described more fully below. The
llebtors also utilize the Operating Account to (i) fund certain credit card processing fees, (ii) send
4DOCS LA:32060A.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 5 of 41
wires to third parties when ACH is not available, and (iii) fund the on premise cash requirements
of individual restaurants.
ii. Accounts Payable Account
10. The Debtors make the majority of accounts payable disbursements and
some minor payroll-related disbursements (e.g., de minimis prepaid payroll debit cards) from a
zero balance account (Account No. 0072, the "Accounts Payable Account") maintained at Wells
Fargo. Disbursements from the Accounts Payable Account are made via automated and manual
checks and ACH transfers. Check runs typically occur on a weekly basis while ACH transfers
occur on a daily basis or as needed. The Accounts Payable Account is funded on an as-needed
and zero balance basis from the Operating Account.
iii. Payroll Account
11. The Debtors make the majority of payroll disbursements from a zero
balance account (Account No. 9829, the "Payroll Account") maintained at Wells Fargo. To meet
their weekly payroll obligations, the Debtors utilize the services of Paycom, a third party payroll
processor. Payments to fund payroll disbursements are made to Paycom from the Payroll Account.
The Payroll Account is funded on an as-needed and zero balance basis from the Operating
Account. The Debtors do not make any non-payroll-related disbursements from the Payroll
Account.
RELIEF REQUESTED
12. By this Motion, the Debtors seek (a) authority to (i) maintain their existing
bank accounts and to pay any prepetition routine banking fees imposed by the financial institutions
where the Debtors' bank accounts are maintained and to continue to use their existing business
5nocs LA:3zo6os.~
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 6 of 41
forms and check stock; (ii) continue to use their existing Cash Management System, as provided
herein; (iii) continue to perform intercompany transactions among the D~btorss (iv) obtain a
limited waiver of the requirements pursuant to section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to the extent
required; and (b) the related relief set forth herein.
A. The Court Should Autho~•ize theDebtors to Maintain Existing Bank Accounts
13. The United States Trustee for the District of Delaware has established
certain operating guidelines for debtors in possession. One such provision requires chapter 11
debtors in possession to close all existing bank accounts and open new bank accounts. The
guidelines also require that debtors maintain new bank accounts in certain financial institutions
designated as authorized depositories by the United States Trustee. This requirement, designed to
provide a clear line of demarcation between prepetition and post-petition claims and payments,
helps protect against the inadvertent payment of prepetition claims by preventing banks from
honoring checks drawn before the Petition Date.
14. The Debtors seek a waiver of the United States Trustee's requirement for
the closure of the Bank Accounts and opening of new post-petition bank accounts at depositories
authorized by the United States Trustee. If strictly enforced in these cases, the requirement to
close and open new accounts would cause a severe disruption in the Debtors' activities and would
impair the Debtors' ability to operate under chapter 11. Maintenance of the Bank Accounts and
the Cash Management System will greatly facilitate the Debtors' operations in chapter 11. The
continued maintenance of the Bank Accounts is of paramount importance because the accounts
are used to collect revenues and effectuate payments to employees and vendors.
DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 7 of 41
15. The Bank Accounts are maintained by a financial institution that is on the
Un~te~1 Stites Trustee's approved depository list for the District of Delaware. If the Bank Accounts
were closed, the Debtors would have to open new accounts and then attempt to arrange alternative
electronic and manual payment procedures for payments into and out of the Debtors' accounts,
which would disrupt the flow ofpost-petition receipts and disbursements. In addition, closing the
Bank Accounts would require the Debtors to cancel and reinstitute wire transfer instructions which
would be difficult to modify under exigent circumstances. This disruption would severely impact
and could irreparably harm the Debtors' ability to operate at this critical juncture. The Debtors
should be permitted to maintain their existing Bank Accounts and, if necessary, open new accounts
as debtors-in-possession accounts, and/or close any unneeded existing Bank Accounts.
16. To guard against improper transfers resulting from the post-petition
honoring of prepetition checks, the Debtors will promptly notify Wells Farga not to honor checks
drawn on the Debtors' accounts before the Petition Date, except upon limited Court-approved
exceptions. Subject to a prohibition against honoring prepetition checks or offsets without specific
authorization from this Court, the Debtors request that they be authorized to maintain and continue
the use of their Bank Accounts in the same manner and with the same account numbers, styles,
and document forms as those employed prepetition.
17. If the relief requested herein is granted, the Debtors will not pay, and Wells
Fargo will be required not to pay, any debts incurred before the Petition Date, other than as
specifically authorized through this Motion or otherwise ordered by the Court.
7DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 8 of 41
B. The Court Should Authorize the Debtors to
Continue Their Existing Cash IVIana~ement System
18. The Debtors hereby seek authority to continue to use their Cash
Managemeni Sysiem as such sys~em rr~ay '~e I~~~difieu ~y tie Debtors. Fir t ~e r~as~~~s set forth
above, the Cash Management System constitutes an essential business practice and was created
and implemented by the management of the Debtors in the exercise of their business judgment.
The Cash Management System provides numerous benefits including the ability to (a) receive
customer payments; (b) allow a mechanism for deposits; (c) pay employee wages and benefits;
and (d) pay vendors. In addition, preserving a "business as usual" atmosphere and avoiding the
unnecessary distractions that would inevitably be associated with a substantial disruption of the
Cash Management System. Moreover, the Debtors submit that the relief requested is consistent
with the relief provided to debtors in a number of other cases pending in this district, as explained
below.
C. The Court Should Authorize the Payment
of Outstanding Routine Prepetition Expenses
Relating to the Operation of the Cash Management System
19. In the ordinary course of the operation and maintenance of the Cash
Management System, the Debtors incur routine bank charges and fees relating to the
administration of the Cash Management System, which also includes fees relating to the
processing of credit cards. While it is difficult to readily determine the aggregate amount of unpaid
prepetition banking fees as of the Petition Date (given, for example, the applicable bank's and third
party payment processors' varying timing of charging/deducting such fees from a given account),
on average, the Debtors pay approximately $250,000 to $300,000 per month.3 The Debtors seek
3 This amount is inclusive of monthly Credit Card Processor fees discussed below.
8DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 9 of 41
authority, in their discretion, to pay any such routine and ordinary course prepetition banking fees
anc~ charges owed to any affected bank and to continue the post-petition payment of such fees and
charges in the ordinary course of business, subject to the terms of any order authorizing the Debtors
to obtain debtor in possession financing (a "Financin~Order")
D. The Court Should Authorize Debtors toContinue Processing Credit Card Transactions
20. The Debtors are party to a Merchant Processing Agreement (the "MPA")
with TSYS Merchant Solutions, LLC, as agent for First National Bank of Omaha (the "Credit Card
Processor"). The Company's customers are able to pay for their meals and other services with
credit cards. For purchases with American Express, the Credit Card Processor remits customer
payments to the Debtors after it withholds the related transaction fees associated with the purchase.
For all others, the Debtors are paid in full for each credit card transaction and the Credit Card
Processor debits the Company's account in the amount of its fee an the second business day of the
following month; provided, however, for credit card transactions in Puerto Rico, the Company is
paid in full for each credit card transaction and pays American Express and Global Payments the
related credit card processing fees at the end of each month.
21. It is routine for the Company's customers to pay using a credit card. As a
result, it is essential that the Debtors maintain the MPA with the Credit Card Processor in the
ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the Debtors request authority to pay any outstanding
fees owed to the Credit Card Processer to ensure that the Debtors continue to receive all of the
benefits and services associated under the MPA.
9DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 10 of 41
22. The Debtors further request that the Court authorize the Banks and, to the
extent applicable, the Company's credit card processors, to process payments in the ordinary
course of business, including the netting out of any fees and/or chargebacks arising before, on, or
after the Petition Date.
E. Tile Court Should Grant a Limited Waiver
PursiYant to Section 345~b) of the Bankruptcy Code
23. The Debtors seek a waiver of section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to the
extent required. The waiver would permit the Debtors to maintain the Bank Accounts without
posting a bond or other security, as would otherwise be required under section 345(b) whenever
the funds on deposit exceed the amount permitted under section 345(b). As explained above, all
of the Bank Accounts are maintained at Wells Fargo, which is a federally insured institution and
approved depository with the United States Trustee.
BASIS FOI2 RELIEF REQUESTED
A. The Continued Use of the Cash Management System
and Bank Accounts Is Essential and Approval to 1Viaintain the Status
Quo Is Routiuel~~ Granted Under Bankruptcy Code Sections 363 and 105
24. Bankruptcy courts routinely grant chapter 11 debtors authority to continue
utilizing existing cash management systems, and treat requests for such authority as a relatively
"simple matter." In re Baldwin-United CoNp., 79 B.R. 321, 327 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1987). This is
particularly true where, as here, the chapter 11 case involves affiliated entities with complex
financial affairs. In In Ne Charter Co., 778 F.2d 617 (1 lth Cir. 1985), for example, the bankruptcy
court entered an order authorizing the debtors and forty-three (43) of their subsidiaries "to continue
to consolidate the management of their cash as has been usual and customary in the past, and to
10DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 11 of 41
transfer monies from affiliated entity to entity, including operating entities that are not debtors."
Id. at 620. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals then affirmed a subsequent district court
decision denying a creditor's motion For leave to appeal the bankruptcy court's cash management
order, holding that authorizing the debtors to utilize their prepetition "routine cash management
system" was "entirely consistent" with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Id. at 621.
25. Likewise, in another context, the bankruptcy court in the Columbia Gas
chapter 11 case explained that a centralized cash management system "allows efficient utilization
of cash resources and recognizes the impracticability ofmaintaining separate cash accounts for the
many different purposes that require cash." In Ne Columbia Gas Sys., Inc., 136 B.R. 930, 934
(Bankr. D. Del. 1993), aff'd in paNt and ~ev'd in past, 997 F.2d 1039 (3d Cir. 1993), cent. denied
sub nofn Official Comrn. of Unsecured C~editoNs v. Columbza Gas Transmission Copp., 114 S. Ct.
1050 (1994). The Third Circuit agreed, emphasizing that a requirement to maintain all accounts
separately "would be a huge administrative burden and economically inefficient." Columbia Gas,
997 F.2d at 1061. See also In Ne SouthmaNk Corp., 49 F.3d 111, 114 (5th Cir. 1995) (cash
management system allows debtors "to administer more efficiently and effectively their financial
operations and assets"); In re UNR Indus., Inc., 46 B.R. 25, 27 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1984).
26. Section 363(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code authorizes the debtors in
possession to "use property of the estate in the ordinary course of business without notice or a
hearing." 11 U.S.C. § 363(c)(1). The purpose of section 363(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code is to
provide a debtors in possession with the flexibility to engage in the ordinary transactions required
to operate their business without undue oversight by creditors or the court. Medical Malpractice
Ins. Assn. v. Hzr~sch (In ~e Lavigne), 114 F.3d 379, 384 (2d Cir. 1997). Included within the
11DOGS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 12 of 41
purview of section 363(c) is a debtors' ability to continue the "routine transactions" necessitated
by a debtors' cash management system. Ancdas~a Nat'l Dist~ib. Co. v. Amdura Corp. (In re
Amdura CoNp.), 75 F.3d 1447, 1453 (lOt" Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the Debtors seek authority
under section 363(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code to continue the collection and disbursement of
cash pursuant to their existing Cash Management System. Additionally the Court may exercise
their equitable powers to grant the relief requested herein. Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code
empowers the Court to "issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary to carry out the
provisions of this title." 11 U.S.C. § 105(a). Continuing the Cash Management System without
interruption is vital to the success of their chapter 11 cases.
27. In other cases in the District of Delaware, this Court has granted relief
substantially similar to that requested in this Motion. See, e.g., In re The Walking Company
Holdings, Inc., Case No. 18-10474 (LSS) (Banlcr. D. Del. Mar. 8, 2018); In Ne Aquion Energy,
Inc., Case No. 17-10500 (KJC) (Bankr. D. Del. Mar. 10, 2017); In ~e Basic Energy SeNvices, Inc.,
et al., Case No. 16-12320 (KJC) (Bankr. D. Del. October 26, 2016); In ~e Key Energy Services,
Inc., et al., Case 16-12306 (BLS) (Bankr. D. Del. October 25, 2016); In Ne Malibu Lighting
CoNpo~ation, et al., Case No. 15-12082 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 9, 2015); In Ne Cache, Inc.,
Case No. 15-10172 (MFW) (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 5, 2015). Accordingly, the Debtors request that
the Court approve the continued use of the Cash Management System and Bank Accounts.
B. The Debtors' Sank Accounts Are I~Compliance With Section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
28. Section 345(a) authorizes deposits or investments of money "as will yield
the maximum reasonable net return on such money, taking into account the safety of such deposit
12DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 13 of 41
or investment." Section 345(b) requires a depository to provide a bond, unless deposits with such
depository are5 "i_n_sured or guarant~~d by the United States or by a department; agency, or
instrumentality of the United States or backed by the full faith and credit of the United States."
29. As noted above, the Debtors' depository accounts are with Wells Fargo
Bank, a bank that has been approved as a depository for funds of debtors in possession by the
United States Trustee for Region 3. Therefore, the Bank Accounts are in compliance with the
security or bonding requirements prescribed by section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and no
security or bonds are necessary to secure the funds in such accounts.
C. The Court Should Grant the Debtors Authority
to Use Existing Checks and Related Forms
30. To minimize expense to their estates, the Debtors request authority to
continue using their respective existing pre-printed check stock, deposit slips, and related forms
without reference to their "debtors in possession" status until the existing stock has been exhausted,
provided that the Debtors shall add the "debtor in possession" designation to any new checks
ordered after the depletion of the existing stock. The Debtors' business forms are primarily
electronically generated, but certain forms used by the Debtors' accounts payable department are
preprinted. Parties doing business with the Debtors undoubtedly will be aware, as a result of the
notice that will be sent of the filing of the Debtors' chapter 11 cases and the publicity of the filing,
of the Debtors' status as a chapter 11 debtors in possession. For this reason, the Debtors request
that they be authorized to use existing checks and deposit slips without placing the label "debtor
in possession" on each such form until such a time as their existing stocks are depleted. In addition,
the Debtors request a reasonable amount of time to alter their software to provide for the insertion
13DOCS LA320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 14 of 41
of "debtor in possession" on postpetition purchase orders and invoices, which the Debtors estimate
may take up to three weeks to implement.
31. Similar relief has been granted in this district. See, e.g., In ~e The Walkzng
Company Holdings, Inc., Case No. 18-10474 (LSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Mar. 8, 2018); In ~e Aquiora
Energy, Inc., Case No. 17-10500 (KJC) (Bankr. D. Del. Mar. 10, 2017); In ~e Malibu Lighting
Corporation, et al., Case No. 15-12082 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 9, 2015).
F. The Debtors Should Be Allo«red to Continue the Intercompany
Transactions and Preserve Intercompany Setoff Rights
32. The Intercompany Transactions allow the Debtors, among other things, to
meet the needs of their customers and suppliers efficiently and in acost-effective manner, through
centralization of key administrative functions. Accordingly, the Debtors believe that the
continuation of the Intercompany Transactions is beneficial to their estates, their creditors and
other parties in interest and, therefore, should be authorized by the Court.
33. To ensure each individual entity will not, at the expense of its creditors,
fund the operations of another entity, the Debtors respectfully request that, pursuant to sections
503(b)(1) and 364(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, all intercompany claims between and among
affiliated Debtors arising after the Petition Date as a result of Intercompany Transactions
(collectively, "Intercompany Claims"), be accorded administrative priority expense status. If
Intercompany Claims are accorded administrative priority expense status, each entity utilizing
funds flowing through the Cash Management System should continue to bear ultimate repayment
responsibility for such ordinary course transactions.
14ROCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 15 of 41
34. The Debtors also seek authorization to preserve and exercise intercompany
setoff rights. Section 553(x) of the Bankrunt~y Code provides that:
Except as otherwise provided in this section and in sections 362 andX63 ~f this title, this title dies not effect any right of a creditor to
offset a mutual debt owing by such creditor to the Debtors that arosebefore the commencement of the case under this title against a claim
of such creditor against the Debtors that arose before the
commencement of the case. .
11 U.S.C. § 553(a). A creditor need only establish two elements before a setoff may be asserted:
mutuality and timing. Official Comm, of Unsecured Creditors v. Mfrs. & T~ade~s Trust Co. (In
re The Bennett Funding Group, Inc.), 212 B.R. 206, 212 (2d Cir. B.A.P. 1997); see also In re
Ve~co IndustNies, 704 F.2d 1134, 1139 (9th Cir. 1983); In re Lundell Farms, 86 B.R. 582, 584
(Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1988). Although courts have not uniformly defined the elements of mutuality,
most courts require the following elements: that the debts be (i) owed between the same parties
and (ii) in the same right or capacity. See S Collies on Bankruptcy ~ 553.03[3][a] at 553-28-29
(15th rev, ed. 2004) (citing Davidovich v. Welton (In ~e Davidovich), 901 F.2d 1533, 1537 (10th
Cir. 1990); Lubman v. Sov~an Bank, N.A. (In re A & B Homes, Ltd.), 98 B.R. 243, 248 (Bankr.
E.D. Va. 1989); see also Cohen v. Says. Bldg. &Loan Co. (In re Bevill, B~esler &Schulman
Asset Mgmt. CoNp.), 896 F.2d 54, 57 (3d Cir. 1990) (explaining that the right of setoff depends on
the existence of mutual debts and claims between the creditor and debtor). Timing requires that
both claims arose prepetition. See Cooper.Iarrett, Inc, v. Cent. Transp., Inc., 726 F.2d 93, 96 (3d
Cir. 1984) (noting that a creditor may not [setoff] its prepetition claims against a debt owed to a
Debtors which came into existence after filing the bankruptcy petition); see also In ~e Sentinel
P~ods.Co~p., 192 B.R. 41, 45 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) ("Section 553(a) of the bankruptcy code preserves
15DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 16 of 41
a creditor's right to set off ...between the Debtors and creditor as long as both debts arose before
the ~omrriencement of the [bankruptcy] case"); In re Westchester StNuctures, 181 B.R. 730, 739
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1995) (same); Arnold M. Quittner, Setoff and Recouprnent, 715 PLI/Comm 633,
661 (1995) (same). As a result, "a creditor may not set off a prepetition claim against a post-
petition debt it owes the debtor, and likewise it may not set off apost-petition claim that it has
against apre-petition debt it owes to a debtor." In ~e Metco Minzng and Minerals, Inc., 171 B.R.
210 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1994); see also In ~e Westchester Structures, 181 B.R. at 739.
35. The Cash Management System and other processes allow the Debtors to
track all obligations owing between related entities and thereby ensure that all setoffs of
Intercompany Transactions will meet both the mutuality and timing requirements of section 553
of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors seek the authority to continue their Intercompany
Transactions in the ordinary course of business, in a manner consistent with the budget attached
to any Financing Order. The Debtors also respectfully request, therefore, that the Debtors
expressly be authorized, subject to any Financing Order to set off obligations arising on account
of Intercompany Transactions between the Debtors. For the avoidance of doubt, the Debtors are
not seeking authority by this Motion to satisfy prepetition claims arising out of Intercompany
Transactions by offsetting such prepetition Intercompany Transactions against post-petition
Intercompany Transactions.
WAIVER OF BANKRUPTCY RULES 6003 AND 6004
36. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 6003(b), "a motion to pay all or part of a claim
that arose before the filing of the petition" shall not be granted by the Court within 21 days of the
Petition Date "[e]xcept to the extent that relief is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparat~le
16Docs ~,n:3zo6os.~
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 17 of 41
harm ...." Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6003(b). For the reasons described more fully above, and as
suppor-tec~ by the First Iaay Declaration, and to the extent that the relief requested herein implicates
Bankruptcy Rule 6003(b), the Debtors submit that the requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 6003 have
been met and that the relief requested in this Motion is necessary to avoid immediate and
irreparable harm.
37. Finally, to implement the foregoing successfully, the Debtors seek a waiver
of the notice requirements under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the fourteen-day stay of an order
authorizing the use, sale, or lease of property under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), to the extent these
rules are applicable.
NOTICE
38. Notice of this Motion shall be given to the following parties or, in lieu
thereof, to their counsel, if known: (a) the Office of the United States Trustee; (b) Key Bank
National Association and Zions Bank, (c) parties asserting liens against the Debtors' assets, and
(d) the Debtors' thirty largest unsecured creditors on a consolidated basis. As the Motion is
seeking "first day" relief, within two business days after the hearing on the Motion, the Debtors
will serve copies of the Motion and any order entered respecting the Motion as required by Del.
Bankr. LR 9013-1(m). The Debtors submit that, in light of the nature of the relief requested, no
other or further notice need be given.
NO PRIOR REQUEST
39. No prior motion for the relief requested herein has been made to this Court
or any other Court.
17DOGS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 18 of 41
WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that the Court enter an interim
order substantially in the form att~che~1 hereto as Exhibit C and a final order granting the relief
requested herein and granting such other relief as is just and proper.
Dated: April 30, 2019 PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL &JONES LLP
c.
e y V. Richards (CA Bar No. 102300)
a es E. O'Neill (DE Bar No. 4042)John W. Lucas (CA Bar No. 271038)
919 N. Market Street, 17t" FloorWilmington, DE 91899Tel: (302) 652-4100Fax: (302). 652-4400E-mail: [email protected]
[email protected] lucas@pszj law. com
Proposed Attorneys for Debtorsand Debtors in Possession
18DOGS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 19 of 41
PRIMARY ACCOUNTS
SUFiACCOUNTS UNDER ACCOUNT NO. -911
::..:.:.
.....:..
..:...:.
::..::::
..::...:
:.:.:.::
.::: ::.
.:..:.
...:..
::...:
.....:
.::...
....::
.::..
,:.
«../..
`¢
,.~.
. . ~..
..
:;;.
F~
~.
'
...
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
....
Sy~yo- .~
F,.~. ~
4..'
g ..
:~.~'i
s'..
:.:u
i~..
.~ ....::.:.
~+.~,+
~ g..
~.
; ;.
£::
...::
:....::.::.a...:....::..:~........:>::...c..
...
~ .
.. `...
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
# 101—
-7414
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#102 -
_742
2L BA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
CHANDLER, AZ
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS CARGO BANK,
#103 —
-7430
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
KANSAS CITY, MO
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#105-
-744
8ZBA-SuBaccotlNT
INC.
I\T.
A.LAS VEGAS, NV
KONG RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#106 -
-7455
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
ING.
N.A.
DENVER, CO
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#107 —
-7463
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
Irrc.
N.A.
OMaxA, NE
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#108 —
-747
1SBA-SUBACCOUNT
I~vc.
N.A.
CAx~rEL, IN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#110 —
-748
9SBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
SAN ANTONIO, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#111—
-749
7ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
DALLAS, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#~ 12 -LINCOLNSHIRE, IL
-7505
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
DOCS LA320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 21 of 41
...... ..
....
.. ..
....
..... ...
. :...~::.::.
:..:
:..:
....
x ...t ....: :..
..::
::.~
:...
....
....
....
....
..
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
..
....
.£
&..~
. .. f ..
....
.£
£..~
`}~
$
g..
.. ..~
...
... ... .. .. b
.... ...
. ....
.. ~.d~
y
.Y~..
....t ..~~,y
........ ... ...
.....£. K.k ..H
.3.. ~`~}....£ f
~..:.:.
..
..k ..
.. .... ..........x....
.. py
.... ~!..
.,
~
.n.. .. ... .:»~.. :...., f...n:n...: ::.
y .:::. .
:.. .. .. .. F ...
Y~.
£ 9 / .l f
~Y.
#5
..
~. .~4.. £.
.£f
...
n.
.:.
.. ~.
.., ..
~~
.....
......x.. ..
.::i
4^:k
."AC
`S%g
in.:
. f: ::
::::
fSR:
"`::
i'..:S"j' ". ...
~..
5.:::......:.. :F::
..
£3:.
. ~f
... ?S. .
. f:
,:.~
'f~:
:`::
`::.
i`.`
.:3?
;..F
::::
::5"
:::
.Y.
f.
...
~..
.. ....
H
..2.
...£
....
~3.«
..~.
:...
::"`
::.:
.::i
::ii
:.i<f':~lw~:~,y~'.~i~'.'.~~!M~..p.~.~~~'~.?.
~.:/
..
~.M#
~...
..
i`R:;:.:n,:.n:£`
..
,•9•.y
~
}:::
: ~+
5
S ■.
~ ~`
%::
~
,~:i
Y::'r
y.$.
...n
:, y. :
:.::.::.:`£`::9. ::.::::.iYf
h.5`
/. ~f
..`%`:
...ff. .
~.y.
~¢
~y~~.S~
~}
~ f
.s:.
...~.
y~~
».
~s .4
#
~:.s~:
::fx
D`.f
{ ~£~~
....
~ ..4...
.::#:~
5~'...
:~
'. .x
.~~
:,.....
i ~
.:..
..n.
.:r.
: ,..
~ f
~ ~ .
f~ ~~
~i
y ..
..
:.e..
.:~~
~~<'
~..~
&:
#`:
}~
' si
fi.
f.:
.. ~w
~w
y~~y~;x~t
f..?:i~ld'%'f":"'.'~~'$'
''.G.S:r.:i;8'#g6::~is~
~5"
.: f
.........f
.............. .
.......~b.'#f <
...
.. . . ... .
s..
................ . . ..
....
....
...... ....
.5.4~
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#113 —
-7513
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
HousTo~v, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
# 114 —
-752
1Z,BA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
OAKBROOK, IL
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#116 —
-753
9ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
AusT
irr,
TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#117 —
-754
7ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
TROY, MI
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#1 ~ S -
-'75
54GBA-SU~ACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
BATON ROUGE, LA
KONA RESTAURANT MOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANTA,
# 12O -
-7562
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
GILBERT, AZ
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#121—
-7570
LBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
STAMFORD, CT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#122 —
_758
8GBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#i24 —
-760
4GBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
GLEN ALLEN, VA
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDII~TGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#126 —
-761
2SBA-SUBACCOUNT
Iivc.
N.A.
IsEL
~rr,
NJ
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#127 —
-7620
SBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
BALTIMORE, MD
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#12g -
-763
8ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
TAMPA, FL
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
# 129 —
-7646
SBA-~UBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
MERIDIAN, ID
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
# 132 —
-767
9ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
EL PAso, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#133 —
-765
7SBA-SuBaccou~rT
INc.
N.A.
CoLUNrsus, OH
DOCS LA:
3206
08.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 22 of 41
f~y/
~.....
~ .`fH. `Yf
5 ~
': H, ~
3~f̀
~~~S
f.
:.
a:.~`~' ~
~1
'`'f
'
f~~y
5
£~
£ `
F'f~Sf`£k'^~~.b'f
~F .
.£..
F~.
..
:..~..
~'Y
..1:.. ~..5~ Ag~
....
~ «.... 5~~..
:S
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
.:
....
f
WELLS FARGO BANK,
.3..
......
..:.. :... :.
.:...........
..........
..
# 134 -
..
............. .........................
..
-7695
..
..
f.f .. ...
..
Z~BA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
ALPHARETTA, GA
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#135 -
-7703
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
SARASOTA, FL
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#136 -
_237
2Z,BA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
SAN JUAN, PR
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#138 -
_7729
L,BA-SUBACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
PLANo, T~
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#140 -
-7745
SBA-SUBACCOUI~TT
INc.
N.A.
AFu.
,riv
GTor
r, CIA
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
# 141-
-775
2ZBA-SuBaccouN`r
I1VC.
N.A.
CINCINNATI, OH
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#143 -
-2315
ZBA-SUF3ACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
SAN ANTONIO, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#144 -
-2323
ZBA-SU~ACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
FRIENDSWOOD, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#145 -
-2331
L,BA-SU:BACCOUNT
INc.
N.A.
Mmrr
ETor
rKa,
MN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#147 -
-2356
L.BA-SUBACCOUNT
Irrc.
N.A.
FxarrKt,nv, TN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#148 -
-236
4ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
HUNTSVTLLE, AL
KONA RESTAUFZANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#ISO -
_'77~g
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
I~rc.
N.A.
HoNOLULu, HI
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
WELLS FARGO BANK,
#154 -
_~~g6
ZBA-SUBACCOUNT
INC.
N.A.
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
DOCS LA:
3206
08.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 23 of 41
Merchant Accounts - TSYS
:::::::.
:......
.:
::.:a:..
~::
:::.
:.:.
:..
..
« :.:.
::::
..:.
: ...
....
y::.
...
.... ..~
. ~.
a:~f
ffjf
i~.
:#~f, x>..':
$.j £.q ,
'.,.3~0•'
y:: «..:
f ..
.: '
z
: ..:.
:, .. .
.. f
:..,
:...
:..:
~:: ~
.... ..
:£ ̀..
..:.
..
....
.. £.
,,..
..::
..
..£:%F< .:
qh.
~ ~ }
~a?k~` £
,..:"f.f..
~,~T
'y.2
%": .NG .:.
::.F
.N X%f
~:«A
Yf.:
iiFf
i..* .
fi..
5
f~.
..
~y
....
t..
..
...
....
... .... ..
.. :...
...
...
..~
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
# 101—
-453
8MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
KONA P~ESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#102 -
-453
8MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
CHANDLER, AZ
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#103 —
-9815
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
KANSAS CITY, MO
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEiVIS
#105
--9
802
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
LAS VEGAS, NV
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#106 -
-979
2MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
DENVER, CO
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
X107 -
-3g']9
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
OMAHA, NE
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#lflg -
-4344
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
CARMEL, IN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#110 —
-433
1MERCHAT?T
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
SAN ANTONIO;
TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#111—
-4328
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
DALLAS, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#112 -LINCOLNSHIRE, IL
-4315
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#113 —
-430
2MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
HOUSTON, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#114 —
-429
2MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
OAKBROOK, IL
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
To`r
aL SYSTEMs
#116 —
-428
9MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
AUSTIN, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#117 —
-4276
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
TROY, MI
DOCS LA:
3206
08.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 24 of 41
,, .
t>~:
x }~
): ~Yh:
y.£'
,:
... f: '
. :..
~..
` ~9~.
'{
~'.
ff
.f~f
4
"'b
i~:
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#118 —
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
BATON ROUGE, LA
-4263
MF,RCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL, SYSTEMS
#120 —
-4250
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
GILBERT, AZ
K.ONA RESTAURANT HOLDII`TGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#121—
-4661
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
STANFORD, CT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#122 -
-4205
MBRCH~NT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#124 —
-422
1MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
GLEN ALLEN, VA
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#126 —
-421
8MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
ISELIN, NJ
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#127 —
-424
7MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
BALTIMORE, MD
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#128 —
-419
5MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
TAMPA, FL
BONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#129 —
_229
2MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
1~1ERIDIAN, ID
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#132 —
_ 1772
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, Irrc
.EL PAso, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#133 —
-8385
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INc.
CoLu~us, OH
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
# 134 —
_6311
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
ALPHARETTA, GA
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
DOTAL SYSTEMS
#135 —
-6308
MERcx~NT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
SARASOTA, FL
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#138 —
-350
7MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
PLANO, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#140 —
-3510
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
ARLINGTON, VA
DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 25 of 41
......
..:..:
..::..
.. ..
....
.>F
F:.
.. <.
.~:
. £.:
F;.
<.
., :
...
...
<...
...F
x. F:
2
K:
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#141 —
-623
1VI~RCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, ANC.
CINCINNATI, ~I~
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#143 —
-424
7MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
SAN ANTONIO, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
DOTAL SYSTEMS
#144 —
-8310
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
FRIENDSWOOD, TX
KONA RESTAliRANTHOLDiNGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#145 —
_gg19
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
IVIINNETONKA, MN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#147 —
-2530
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
FRANKLIN, TN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#148 —
-3206
MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
HLJNTSVILLE, AL
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
# 150 —
-398
2MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
I~ONOLULU, HI
K~NA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS,
TOTAL SYSTEMS
#154 -
-883
2MERCHANT
INC.
SERVICES, INC.
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
1VIerchant Acc
ount
s —AMEX
.::...:.f. ~. ..
., t
~.r:...H:...t..M.
g f
t ..
.:
5
kS..f
/...
..%.
...
of ~
x
......
...
W
f.fn... .f. Y.
:.f
MF}.
....
...
.n......} f
Y
~~
i . ' ' '.:.'
....
...
f:Y2:
»:Y.
y~,.
.:..
.:Ka
`<4:
Y.a~
Ncf'
%fb`::6
~fi
5'..~4
.~.
.~ff
. t.~~S .4~
~ .
.:h
.. '~~
:.
.:..
f~5{~9~~
:.
x65
~j#'
$:k:$~y;:.~"~
....
....
..<
.......
..~.
....
'.`Y
....
....
..~.
~...
..'S
.'..
..f .. ....
............ .......... .....
~.A'
£''
`6 £'
5~'~ ~
g
ff
$:~
f
~°!~~
.Y~T;~~~i fS.'.:
#::£~`.: ~~:li.~u:..iv'~~'. '~
'o :;i4
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
# 101—
-744s
MERCHANT
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
# 102 -
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
-3259
MERCHANT
CHANDLER, AZ
#103 —
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
-189
1MERCHANT
KANSAS CITY, MO
#1 OS-
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
-9528
MERCHANT
LAS VEGAS, NV
DOCS LA.
:320
608.
7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 26 of 41
~,~.:::....:>:.:.... ~
. .3'
.x
..:.
,~..
. ;.
..S.
, r.:,
..sh
..
i , s . .. 4 .r
s ,~n:
$. ,
...:
...:
:..:
.. .: ff .:: .~
:.:.
.,. ... .:
: in "
:.#:hi ~
.s::
a~.
~'.:.
..:k
.::'
.:::
£`~»
~:iY
::.:
:£::
3:'.
`:°,
3`:9
i.:i
::i:
:k..
:f::
.::;
iY.r
%Fui
:£Y3
.:::
:.rt
i.3`
...?
:3:J
H::~
i~..
.:..
.ss s
F
s̀!̀
.s : s.:
~.y~~*
., a:
~s
x"1,yg<
~~,i
.r,~
~y
~ ~x~~
,?:r
~ ' >y::
.. f
y~
'... ::~
i i
r#
;.
.::..
...s
~:,
.~++
f:i
_;A
~ ~
:: «.. ..
.. :
.. ::n
'~
s..
. .:.: .: :'.
.: ...
.:'::~i:
..
...
~ i .».
#1Q6 -
.~5
..~5..
5ys.
.. ~.Y..~
.....:
~:
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
DENVER, CO
-326
oMERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
# 107 -
-0829
MERCHANT
OMAHA, NE
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
AMEX
#~flg -
-4251
MERCHANT
CARMEL, IN
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
AIVjEX
#110 -
-9937
MERCHAN'~:'
SAN ANTONIO, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INS.
AMEX
#111—
_4 22
MERCHAN`~'
DALLAS, TX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, I~
~.AMEX
# I I2 -LINCOLNSHIRE, IL
-6940
MERCHANT'
KONA RESTAURANT MOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#113 —
HOUSTON, TX
-so9
6MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, IN
c.AMEX
#114 —
OAKBROOK, IL
-s62
~MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT MOLDINGS, IrTc
.AMEX
#116 —
AUSTIN, TX
-283
4MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
AMEX
# 117 —
-992
1MERCHANT
TROY, MI
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, II
~TC.
AMEX
#1 Z S -
'BATON ROUGE, LA
-1250
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
AMEX
# 12O -
GILBERT, AZ
-4248
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, IN
c.AMEX
#121
STAMFORD, CT
-5991
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#122
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
-7559
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#124 —
GLEN ALLEN, VA
-s8s
~MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
A1VjEX
# 126 -
-3699
MERCHANT
IsEL
nv, NJ
DOCS L
A:320608.'7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 27 of 41
c.::;Y
..~.:.gy~~.yf
..
. ,
~f~
::
£:
t §,
4
...
"£ "
~::f
$~
$
""`.` ~::.%%~`.1i...a :i
.i:3. '
...:
£`f<
fi:.
..
9..£
...Y...
~,~>
s 4
~
~
$
£ fk:
j;
.:::..
.. ~::>..~
~
#12~
BALTIMORE, MD
-0355
6
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, Ir
rc.
AMEX
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#12g
TAMPA, FL
-2586
ME~ZCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#129 -
MERIDIAN, ID
-3319
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#132 —
EL PAso, TX
-3783
MERCHANT
K.ONA RESTAURANT MOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#133 —
COLUMBUS, OH
-613
1MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMAX
# 134 -
ALPHARETTA, GA
-057
9MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#135 -
SARASOTA, FL
-5891
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#138 —
PLANO, TX
-256
5MERCHANT
I<,.ONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#140 -
ARLINGTON, VA
-1834
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT MOLDINGS, Irrc.
AMEX
#141—
CINCINNATI, DPI
-43 g4
MERCHANT
KONA ~2ESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
AlV1EX
#143 -
SAN ANTONIO, TX
-3354
IVIERCHAN`~
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#144 —
FRIENDSWOOD, TX
-o3s4
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#145 -
MINNETONKA, IVIN
-120
3MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INc.
AMEX
#~47
FRANKLIN, TN
-2641
MERCHANT
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, Ivc.
AMEX
# 148 -
HUNTSVILLE, AL
_2g2
gMERCHANT
DOCS LA:
3206
08.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 28 of 41
MERCHANT ACCOUNT -GLOBAL PAYMENTS (PUERTO RICO)
,:.
5l
f f`.f l
f f ~
..
=;y
..
~ .
t:Rk»:SJX::.' .:::
..
f
•ai.'
.'hY
£kr
Y.~
9< <
I
s.
~{: ::~
y
KONA RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.
GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INc.
#136 —
-969
50
MERCHANT
SAN JUAN, PR
DOCS LA:
3206
08.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 29 of 41
EXHIBIT BCash 1Vlanagement System Flow Chart
DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 30 of 41
Customer Cash
I (
Customer Credit
i Ca
rd Receipts
We1Is ~arn~
i ~
`"~ i
' -
Miscellaneous
Sub-lacco~ ~~
, ~.~
r~
~ ,~1-~
tChecks / ACH
><>R:,,w:
~: ~:
::~,::
;,_~L
~~.~.~
.~_, l,lt ;~
~.`~~~~~t€tC~ .
::.::...
::::.~:.
P rt s
Third
a ie
~~
~~ ~ c:
c. r
~ ' :~
~~
.~ ..
~
Debtor
<'Account
Third Parry
Account
Third Parties
I i
Third Parties
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 31 of 41
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
I'OR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re: ) Chapter 11
KONA GRILL, INC., et al.,l ) Case No.: 19-10953 (_)Joint Administration Requested
Debtors. )
INTERIM ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 105, 345, 363, 364, 503, 1107 AND 1108OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AUTHORIZING (I) MAINTENANCEOF EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS; (II) CONTINUANCE OF EXISTINGCASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, BANK ACCOUNTS, CHECKS AND
RELATED FORMS; (III) CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF INTERCOMPANYTRANSACTIONS; (IV) LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 345(b) DEPOSIT
AND INVESTIVIENT REQUIREMENTS AND (V) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
Upon consideration of the motion (the "Motion")2 of the above-captioned
debtors and debtors in possession (the "Debtors") for the entry of an Order under sections
105, 345, 363, 1107, and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code authorizing: (i) the maintenance of
existing bank accounts including the authority to pay routine prepetition banking fees owed
to financial institutions; (ii) the continued use of the Debtors' existing cash management
system, bank accounts, checks and related forms for the Debtors; (iii) continued performance
of intercompany transactions; and (iv) a limited waiver under Bankruptcy Code section 345(b)
to the extent necessary; and upon the First Day Declaration; and it appearing that the relief
requested is in the best interests of the Debtors' estates, their creditors and other parties in
I The Debtors and the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers include: Kona Grill, Inc.(6690); 3~ona Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (6703); Kona Sushi, Inc. (4253); Kona Macadamia, Inc. (2438); Kona TexasRestaurants, Inc. (4089); Kona Grill International Holdings, Iiic. (181); Kona Baltimore, Inc. (91b3); Kona GrillInternational, Inc. (7911); and Kona Grill Puerto Rico, Inc. (7641). The headquarters and service address for theabove-captioned Debtors is 15059 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254.
2 A capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Motion.
DOCS LA320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 33 of 41
interest; and it appearing that this Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1S7 and 1334; and it appearing that this matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 157(b)(2); and due and adequate notice of the Motion having been given under the
circumstances; and after due deliberation and cause appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion is GRANTED, on an interim basis as set forth herein.
2. A final hearing on the relief sought in the Motion shall be conducted on
May _, 2019 at (ET). Any objections to the Motion and to entry of a final order must be
filed on or before May , 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) (the "Objection Deadline") and served
so that it is received and by the following parties on or before the Objection Deadline: (i) the
Debtors, Kona Grill, Inc., 15059 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 300, Scottsdale, AZ 85254, Attn:
Christopher J. Wells; (ii) proposed counsel for the Debtors, Pachulski Stang Ziehl &Jones LLP,
919 N. Market Street, 17th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: James E. O'Neill
([email protected]); (iii) counsel to any statutory committee appointed in these cases; (iv)
counsel for the Debtors' prepetition and postpetition secured lenders, Buchanan Ingersoll &
Rooney PC, 919 North Market Street, Suite 990, Wilmington, DE 19801-1054 Attn: Mary F.
Caloway, ([email protected]); and (v) the Office of The United States Trustee, Attn:
Jaclyn Weissgerber, (j [email protected]), 844 King Street, Suite 2207, Lockbox 35,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
3. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, in the reasonable exercise of
their business judgment, (i) to designate, maintain and continue to use, with the same account
numbers, all of the bank accounts in existence on the Petition Date, including, without limitation,
2ROCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 34 of 41
those accounts identified on Exhibit A to the Motion (the "Bank Accounts"); (ii) treat the Bank
Accounts for all purposes as debtors in possession accounts9 (iii) use all existing paper check stock
and related forms without reference to the Debtors' status as "debtors in possession" until such
supply is depleted, after which the Debtors will order new check stock, deposit slips and related
forms with the "debtor in possession" reference; and (iv) are afforded a reasonable time to arrange
for the labeling of "debtor in possession" on purchase orders and invoices issued postpetition, as
requested in the Motion.
4. The Debtors are authorized to close such sub-accounts described in the
Motion that are no longer necessary to the operation of the Company as a result of a restaurant
closure, without further order of the Court.
5. The banks set forth on Exhibit A to the Motion and any other bank (each, a
"Bank" and collectively, the "Banks") at which any Bank Account is or may be maintained are
hereby authorized to continue to service and administer such Bank Account as an account of the
Debtors as a debtor in possession bank account without interruption and in the usual and ordinary
course of business, and to receive, process, honor and pay any and all checks and drafts drawn on
the Bank Accounts after the Petition Date by the holders or makers thereof, as the case may be;
provided, however, that any check that the Debtors advise any Bank to have been drawn or issued
by the Debtors before the Petition Date maybe honored by any Bank only if specifically authorized
by order of this Court.
6. Except as modified by this Order, the Debtors' existing banking agreements
with the Banks with respect to the Bank Accounts and with respect to the transfers to and from the
3DOGS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 35 of 41
Bank Accounts shall continue to govern the post-petition cash management relationship between
the Debtors and each of the Banks.
7. The Debtors and each of the Banks may, without further order of this Court,
agree to and implement changes to the Cash Management System and procedures in the ordinary
course of business and/or in accordance with the terms of any Financing Order, including, without
limitation, the opening and closing of bank accounts with notice from the Debtor to the United
States Trustee, which accounts shall similarly be subject to this Order.
8. In the course of providing cash management services to the Debtors, each
Bank is authorized, without further order of this Court, to continue to deduct from the appropriate
accounts of the Debtors, the Bank's routine and ordinary course fees and expenses associated with
the nature of the deposit and cash management services rendered to the Debtors. The Debtors are
also authorized to remit or pay all prepetition and postpetition credit card processing fees in the
ordinary course of business.
9. With respect to all checks that have not been honored prior to the Petition
Date (the "Prepetition Checks"), the Debtors shall, no later than the close of business on the 5th
business day following entry of this Order, (a) place a stop payment on all such unauthorized
Prepetition Checks to be dishonored in accordance with the applicable Bank's stop payment
procedures (the "Voided Prepetition Checks"); and (b) send the Banks an electronic file containing
specific data for each applicable Voided Prepetition Check, together with a written representation
that a stop payment has been placed on all applicable Voided Prepetition Checks (the "Stop
Payment Representation"). All unauthorized Prepetition Checks that are not Voided Prepetition
Checks will be Prepetition Checks for which the Debtors have Court approval to pay and want the
4DOGS LA320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 36 of 41
Banks to honor, and the Banks shall promptly honor each such Prepetition Check after receipt of
the Stop Payment Representation from the Debtors. A Bank's reasonable reliance on the Stop
Payment Representation in connection with its honoring or dishonoring of a Prepetition Check, as
the case may be, shall not constitute a violation of this Order.
10. Each Bank that maintains a disbursement account of the Debtors shall
implement reasonable handling procedures designed to effectuate the terms of this Order, and no
Bank that implements such handling procedures and then honors a prepetition check or other item
drawn on any account that is the subject of this Order either (i) at the direction of the Debtors to
honor such prepetition check or item, (ii) in good faith belief that the Court has authorized such
prepetition check or item to be honored, or (iii) as a result of an innocent mistake made despite
implementation of such handling procedures, shall be deemed in violation of this Order.
11. The Debtors may continue to fund their businesses and operations through
the Bank Accounts, consistent with the terms, conditions, and budget attached to any Financing
Order.
12. The Debtors shall maintain detailed records reflecting all transfers of funds
(including any Intercompany Transactions) under the terms and conditions provided for by the
existing agreements with the institutions participating in the Cash Management System and any
Financing Order. In connection with the ongoing utilization of their Cash Management System,
the Debtors shall continue to maintain records in the ordinary course of business with respect to
all transfers so that all transactions (including any Intercompany Transactions) may be readily
ascertained, traced and recorded properly on the applicable accounts and distinguished between
prepetition and post-petition transactions.
5DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 37 of 41
13. The Debtors are authorized to open any new Bank Accounts or close any
existing Bank Accounts as they may, in their discretion, deem necessary and appropriate; provided,
however, that the Debtors give notice within 14 days to the Office of the United States Trustee for
the District of Delaware and any statutory committees appointed in these chapter 11 cases;
provided, further, however, that the Debtors shall open any such new Bank Account at a bank that
has (i) executed a Uniform Depository Agreement with the Office of the United States Trustee for
the District of Delaware, or at a bank that is willing to immediately execute such an agreement;
(ii) or in accordance with the terms of any Financing Order; pNovided, furtheN, that any such new
Bank Account shall be subject to the terms of this Order and any Financing Order. For the
avoidance of doubt, the notice requirements contained in this paragraph do not apply to the closure
of sub-accounts related to closed restaurant locations.
14. For banks at which the Debtors hold bank accounts that are party to a
Uniform Depository agreement with the Office of the United States Trustee for the District of
Delaware, within 14 days of the date of entry of this Order the Debtors shall (a) contact each bank,
(b) provide the bank with each of the Debtors' employer identification numbers and (c) identify
each of their bank accounts held at such banks as being held by a debtors in possession in a
bankruptcy case.
15. The Debtors are authorized to continue utilizing their Cash Management
System to manage the Debtors' cash, in a manner consistent with the Debtors' prepetition
practices, in accordance with the terms of any Financing Order entered by the Court, and this
Order.
DDOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 38 of 41
16. The Debtors are authorized to continue to consummate the Intercompany
Transactions with other Debtors, and to create Intercompany Claims.
17. The Debtors are authorized to deposit funds, in excess of amounts insured
by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation so long as such funds are deposited in a Bank
Account with a bank that has a Uniform Depository Agreement with the Office of the United States
Trustee.
18. Each of the Debtors' Banks is authorized to debit the Bank Accounts in the
ordinary course of business without the need for further order of this Court for: (i) all checks drawn
on the Bank Accounts which are cashed at such Bank's counters or exchanged for cashier's checks
by the payees thereof prior to the Petition Date; (ii) all checks or other items deposited in one of
Bank Accounts with such Bank prior to the Petition Date which have been dishonored or returned
unpaid for any reason, together with any fees and costs in connection therewith, to the same extent
the Debtors were responsible for such items prior to the Petition Date; and (iii) all undisputed
prepetition amounts outstanding as of the date hereof, if any, owed to any Bank as service charges
for the maintenance of the Cash Management System.
19. The Banks and, to the extent applicable, the Company's credit card
processors, are authorized to process payments in the ordinary course of business, including the
netting out of any fees and/or chargebacks arising before, on, or after the Petition Date.
20. Any of the Debtors' Banks may rely on the representations of the Debtors
with respect to whether any check or other payment order drawn or issued by the Debtors prior to
the Petition Date should be honored pursuant to this or any other order of this Court, and such
7DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 39 of 41
Bank shall not have any liability to any party for relying on such representations by the Debtors as
provided for herein.
21. Except as otherwise set forth in this Order: (i) those certain existing deposit
agreements between the Debtors and the Banks shall continue to govern the postpetition cash
management relationship between the Debtors and the Banks, and all of the provisions of such
agreements, including, without limitation, the termination and fee provisions, shall remain in full
force and effect, and (ii) either the Debtors or the Banks may, without further Order of this Court,
implement changes to the cash management systems and procedures in the ordinary course of
business pursuant to terms of those certain existing deposit agreements, including, without
limitation, the opening and closing of bank accounts, provided, however, that any such changes to
the existing cash management systems and procedures shall be subject to the terms of this Order
and any Financing Order.
22. The Debtors shall cause a copy of this Order to be served on each Bank at
which a Bank Account is maintained within 7 days of the entry of this Order.
23. The requirements set forth in Bankruptcy Rule 6003(b) are satisfied by the
contents of the Motion.
24. The Bank Accounts comply with the requirements imposed under section
345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. The requirements of Bankruptcy Code section 345(b) are deemed
satisfied.
25. Notwithstanding the relief granted in this Order, any payment made (or to
be made) by the Debtors pursuant to the authority granted herein shall be subject to the terms,
conditions, limitations and requirements of any Financing Order.
8ROCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 40 of 41
26. The notice requirements under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the stay under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) are hereby waived, to the extent that they apply.
27. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising
from the implementation of this Order.
Dated: May ~, 2019
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
9DOCS LA:320608.7
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-1 Filed 05/02/19 Page 41 of 41
1N THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Tn re: ) Chapter 11
KONA GRILL, INC., et al., ~ ) Case No.: 19-10953 (CSS }Joint Administration Requested
Debtors. )RE: Docket No. 8
INTERIM ORDER UNDER SECTIONS IOS, 345, 3b3, 364, 503, 1107 AND 1108OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AUTIORiZING (Y) MAINTENANCEOF EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS; (II) CONTINUANCE OF EXISTINGCASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, BANK ACCOUNTS, CHECKS AND
RELATED FORMS; (III) CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF INTERCOMPANYTIZAN~ACTIONS; (IV) LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 345(b) DEPOSIT
AND INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS AND (V) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF
Upon consideration of the motion (the "Motion")2 of the above-captioned
debtors and debtors in possession (the "Debtors") for the entry of an Order under sections
105, 345, 363, 1107, and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code authorizing: (i) the maintenance of
existing bank accounts including the authority to pay routine prepetition banking fees owed
to financial institutions; (ii) the continued use of the Debtors' existing cash management
system, bank accounts, checks and related forms for the Debtors; (iii) continued performance
of intercompany transactions; and (iv) a limited waiver under Bankruptcy Code section 345(b)
to the extent necessary; and upon the First Day Declaration; and it appearing that the relief
requested is in the best interests of the Debtors' estates, their creditors and other parties in
The Debtors and the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers include: Kona Grill, Inc.(6b90); Kona Restaurant Holdings, Ina (6703); Kona Sushi, Inc. (4253); Kona Macadamia, Ina (2438); Kona TexasRestaurants, Inc. (4089); Kona Grill International Holdings, Inc. (1841); Kona Baltimore, Ina (9163); Kona GrillInternational, Ina (7911); and Kona Grill Puerto Rico, Inc. (7641). The headquarters and service address for theabove-captioned Debtors is 15054 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 300, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254.
2 A capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Motion.
DOGS LA:32Q608.9
Docket No. 40Date: 5/2/19
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 2 of 10
interest; and it appearing that this Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§ 157 anc~ 1334; and it appearing that this matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 15?(b)(2); and due and adequate notice of the Motion having been given under the
circumstances; and after due deliberation and cause appearing therefor,
YT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion is GRANTED, on an interim basis as set forth herein.
2. A final hearing on the relief sought in the Motion shall be conducted on
May ~~ 2019 at (on T~,(ET). Any objections to the Motion and to entry of a final order must
be filed on or before May z ~ , 2019 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) (the "Objection Deadline") and
served so that it is received and by the following parties on or before the Objection Deadline:
(i) the Debtors, Kona Griil, Inc., 15059 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 300, Scottsdale, AZ 85254,
Attn: Christopher 3. Wells; (ii) proposed counsel for the Debtors, Pachutski Stang Ziehl &
Jones LLP, 919 N. Market Street, 17th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: James E. O'Neill
([email protected]); (iii) counsel to any statutory committee appointed in these cases; (iv)
counsel for the Debtors' prepetition and postpetition secured lenders, Buchanan Ingersoll &
Rooney PC, 919 North Market Street, Suite 990, Wilmington, DE 19801-1054 Attn: Mary P.
Calaway, ([email protected]); acid {v) the Office of The United States Trustee, Attn:
Jaclyn Weissgerber, ([email protected]}, 844 King Street, Suite 2207, Lockbox
35, Wilmington, Delaware 19801,
3. The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, in the reasonable exercise
of their business judgment, {i} to designate, maintain and continue to use, with the same
account numbers, all of the bank accounts in existence on the Petition Date, including, without
f 2
DOCS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 3 of 10
limitation, those accounts identified on E~ibit A to the Motion (the "Bank Accounts"}; (ii)
treat the Bank Accounts for all purposes as debtors in possession accounts; (iii) use all existing
paper check stock and related forms without reference to the Debtors' status as "debtors in
possession" until such supply is depleted, after which the Debtors will order new check stock,
deposit slips and related forms with the "debtor in possession" reference and the corresponding
bankiliptcy case number; and (iv) are afforded a reasonable time to arrange for the labeling of
"debtor in possession" on purchase orders and invoices issued postpetition, as requested in the
Motion.
4. The Debtors are authorized to close such sub-accounts described in the
Motion that are no longer necessary to the operation of the Company as a result of a restaurant
closure, without further order of the Court.
5. The banks set forth on E~ibit A to the Motion and any other bank (each,
a "Bank" and collectively, the "Banks") at which any Bank Account is or raay be maintained
are hereby authorized to continue to service and administer such Bank Account as an account
of the Debtors as a debtor in possession bank account without interruption and in the usual and
ordinary course of business, and to receive, process, honor and pay any and all checks and
drafts drawn on the Bank Accounts after the Petition Date by the holders or makers thereof, as
the case may be; provided, however, that any check that the Debtors advise any Bank to have
been drawn or issued by the Debtors before the Petition Date may be honored by any Bank
only if specifically authorized by order of this Court.
6. Except as modified by this Order, the Debtors' existing banking
agreements with the Banks with respect to the Bank Accounts and with respect to the transfers
DOCS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 4 of 10
to and from the Bank Accounts shall continue to govern the post-petition cash management
relationship between the Debtors and each of the Banks.
7. The Debtors and each of the Banks may, without further order of this
Court, agree to and implement changes to the Cash Management System and procedures in the
ordinary course of business and/or in accordance with the terms of any Financing Order,
including, without limitation, the opening and closing of bank accounts with notice from the
Debtor to the United States Trustee, which accounts shall similarly be subject to this Order.
8. Tn the course of providing cash management services to the Debtors,
each Bank is authorized, without further order of this Court, to continue to deduct from the
appropriate accounts of the Debtors, the Bank's routine and ordinary course fees and expenses
associated with the nature of the deposit and cash management services rendered to the
Debtors. The Debtors are also authorized to remit or pay all prepetition and postpetition credit
card processing fees in the ordinary course of business.
9. With respect to all checks that have not been honored prior to the
Petition Date (the "Prepetition Checks"), the Debtors sha11, no later than the close of business
on the 5th business day fallowing entry of this Order, (a) place a stop payment on all such
unauthorized Prepetition Checks to be dishonored in accordance with the applicable Bank's
stop payment procedures (the "Voided Pre~etition_ Checks"); and (b) send the Banks an
electronic file containing specific data for each applicable Voided Prepetition Check, together
with a written representation that a stop payment has been placed on all applicable Voided
Prepetition Checks (the "Sto~Payment Representation"). All unauthorized Prepetition Checks
that are not Voided Prepetition Chec~Cs will be Prepetition Checks for which tie Debtors have
4ROCS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 5 of 10
Court approval to pay and want the Banks to honor, and the Banks shall promptly honor each
such Prepetition Check after receipt of the Stop Payment Representation from the Debtors. A
Bank's reasonable reliance on the Stop Payment Representation in connection with its
honoring or dishonoring of a Prepetition Check, as the case may be, shall not constitute a
violation of this Order.
10. Each Bank that maintains a disbursement account of the Debtors shall
implement reasonable handling procedures designed to effectuate the terms of this Order, and
no Bank that implements such handling procedures and then honors a prepetition check or
other item drawn on any account that is the subject of this Order either (i) at the direction of
the Debtors to honor such prepetition check or item, (ii} in good faith belief that the Court has
authorized such prepetition check ar item to be honored, or (iii) as a result of an innocent
mistake made despite implementation of such handling procedures, shall be deemed iii
violation of this Order.
11. The Debtors may continue to fund their businesses and operations
through the Bank Accounts~c a ~Y
• ,, _ ~ .'-
12. The Debtors shall maintain detailed records reflecting all transfers of
funds (including any Intercompany Transactions} under the terms and conditions provided for
by the existing agreements with the institutions participating in the Cash Management System
and any Financing Order. In connection with the ongoing utilization of their Cash
Management System, the Debtors shall continue to maintain records in the ordinary cauxse of
business with respect to all transfers so that all traxisactions (including any Intercompany
5DOCS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 6 of 10
Transactions) may be readily ascertained, traced and recorded properly on the applicable
accounts and distinguished between prepetition and post-petition fransacicions.
13. The Debtors are authorized to open any new Bank Accounts or close
any existing Bank Accounts as they may, in their discretion, deem necessary and appropriate;
provzded, however, that the Debtors give notice within 14 days to the Office of the United
States Trustee for the District of Delaware and any statutory committees appointed in these
chapter Z 1 cases; provided, further, however, that the Debtors shall open any such new Bank
Account at a bank that has (i) executed a Uniform Depository Agreement with the Office of
the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware, or at a bank that is willing to
immediately execute such an agreement; ~' ~ng
Qrcie~; provided, further, that any such new Bank Account shall be subject to the terms of this
Order .For the avoidance of doubt, the notice requirements contained
in this paragraph do not apply to the closure of sub-accounts related to closed restaurant
locations.
14. For banks at which the Debtors hold bank accounts that are party to a
Uniform Depository agreement with the Off ce of the United States Trustee far the District of
Delaware, within 14 days of the date of entry of this Order the Debtors shall (a) contact each
bank, (b) provide the bank with each of the Debtors' employer identification numbers and (c)
identify each of their bank accounts held at such banks as being held by a debtors in possession
in a bankruptcy case and provide the case number.
15. The Debtors are authorized to continue utilizing their Cash Management
System to manage the Debtors' cash, in a manner consistent with the Debtors' prepetition
6DOGS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 7 of 10
practices, ' F' ere Co is
16. The Debtors are authorized to continue to consummate the
Intercompany Transactions with other Debtors, and to create Intercompany Claims, provided,
however, to the extent that the Debtors have any non-debtor affiliates, the Debtors are
prohibited from making any intercompany transfers to such non-debtor affiliates, absent
fiuther order of the Court.
17. The Debtors are authorized to deposit funds, in excess of amounts
insured by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation so long as such funds are deposited
in a Bank Account with a hank that has a Uniform Depository Agreement with the Office of
the United States Trustee.
18. Each of the Debtors' Banks is authorized to debit the Bank Accounts in
the ordinary course of business without the need for further order of this Court for; (i) all checks
drawn on the Bank Accounts which are cashed at such Bank's counters or exchanged for
cashier's checks by the payees thereof prior to the Petition Date; (ii) all checks or other items
deposited in one of Bank Accounts with such Bank prior to the Petition Date which have been
dishonored or returned unpaid for any reason, together with any fees and costs in connection
therewith, to the same extent the Debtors were responsibly for such items prior to the Petition
Date; and (iii) all undisputed prepetition amounts outstanding as of the date hereof, if any,
owed to any Bank as service charges for the maintenance of the Cash Management System.
7DOGS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 8 of 10
19. The Banks and, to the extent applicable, the Company's credit card
processors, ire ~uihorized ~o process payrne~ris in the aedina~y coi~fse of ~~si~-iess, iiicludii~g
the netting aut of any fees and/or chargebacks arising before, on, ar after the Petition Date.
20. Any of the Debtors' Banks may rely on the representations of the
Debtors with respect to whether any check or other payment order drawn or issued by the
Debtors prior to the Petition Date should be honored pursuant to this ar any other order of this
Court, and such Bank shall not have any liability to any party for relying on such
representations by the Debtors as provided for herein.
21. Except as otherwise set forth in this Order: (i} those certain existing
deposit agreements between the Debtors and the Banks shall continue to govern the
postpetition cash management relationship between the Debtors and the Banks, and all of the
provisions of such agreements, including, without limitation, the termination and fee
provisions, shall remain in full force and effect, and (ii) either the Debtors or the Banks may,
without further Order of this Court, implement changes to the cash management systems and
procedures in the ordinary course of business pursuant to terms of those certain existing deposit
agreer~~ents, including, without limitation, the opening and closing of bank accounts, x~
ges to t e exis m anagement syste 11
22. The Debtors shall cause a copy of this Order to be served on each Bank
at which a Bank Account is maintained within 7 days of the entry of this Order.
23. The requirements set forth in Bankruptcy Rine 6003(b) are satisfied by
the contents of the Motion.
8DOGS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 9 of 10
24. The Bank Accounts comply with the requirements imposed under
section 345(b} of the Bankruptcy Code. The requirements of Bankr~tpicy Code seciion 345~b)
are deemed satisfied.
25. Notwithstanding the use of a consolidated cash management system, the
Debtors shall calculate quarterly fees under 28 U.S.C. section 1930(a)(6) based on the
disbursements of each debtor, regardless of who pays those disbursements
26. The notice requirements under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the stay
under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) are hereby waived, to the extent that they apply.
27. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters
arising from the implementation of this Order.
Dated: May 2-r 2d19
CHRISTOPHER S. SONTCHI
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
9DOCS LA:320608.9
Case 19-10953-CSS Doc 67-2 Filed 05/02/19 Page 10 of 10