IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 · (HMT) Reference Decisions Requested Decision...
67
IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of the Proposed Chatham Islands Resource Management Document 2014 REPORT AND DECISION OF THE HEARINGS COMMITTEE 30 th JUNE 2015
Transcript of IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 · (HMT) Reference Decisions Requested Decision...
IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of the Proposed Chatham Islands Resource
Management Document 2014
REPORT AND DECISION OF THE HEARINGS COMMITTEE
30th JUNE 2015
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
2
1.0
INTR
OD
UC
TIO
N
Hea
rings
Com
mitt
ee’s
Brie
f 1.
1 In
und
erta
king
a re
view
of t
he o
pera
tive
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jan
uary
200
1 (C
IRM
D) u
nder
sec
tion
79 o
f the
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Act
199
7 (R
MA
or ‘t
he A
ct’),
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Cou
ncil
(‘the
Cou
ncil’)
pre
pare
d an
d no
tifie
d th
e Pr
opos
ed C
hath
am Is
land
s R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent D
ocum
ent J
uly
2014
. 1.
2 Th
e C
ounc
il’s p
ower
s to
hea
r and
dec
ide
subm
issi
ons
to th
e pr
opos
ed C
IRM
D 2
014
wer
e de
lega
ted
unde
r Sch
edul
e 7,
cla
uses
30
and
30A
of t
he L
ocal
G
over
nmen
t Act
200
2 (L
GA
) to
a H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
com
pris
ing
inde
pend
ent H
earin
gs C
omm
issi
oner
Sha
ron
McG
arry
(Cha
ir), M
ayor
Alfr
ed P
reec
e,
Cou
ncill
or N
igel
Rya
n an
d C
ounc
illor
Mon
ique
Cro
on.
This
is th
e re
port
and
deci
sion
of t
he H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
. Pr
elim
inar
y C
omm
ents
1.
3 Be
fore
mov
ing
onto
the
subs
tant
ive
porti
on o
f thi
s re
port
and
deci
sion
, we
reco
rd o
ur a
ppre
ciat
ion
at th
e m
anne
r in
whi
ch th
e he
arin
g w
as c
ondu
cted
by
all t
he p
artie
s ta
king
par
t. W
e w
ould
like
to a
ckno
wle
dge
the
follo
win
g en
deav
ours
: ·
The
role
of t
he C
ounc
il’s R
epor
ting
Offi
cer,
Mr D
avid
Gre
gory
and
the
assi
stan
ce o
f Mr P
aul W
hyte
; and
·
The
willi
ngne
ss o
f sub
mitt
ers
and
advi
sors
to a
ccom
mod
ate
a ce
rtain
am
ount
of d
ialo
gue
betw
een
the
parti
es d
urin
g th
e co
urse
of t
he h
earin
g vi
a th
e qu
estio
ns o
f cla
rific
atio
n ap
proa
ch w
hich
we
adop
ted.
1.4
The
abov
e ac
tions
hav
e gr
eatly
ass
iste
d us
whe
n as
sess
ing
and
dete
rmin
ing
the
issu
es.
2.0
BA
CK
GR
OU
ND
2.
1 Th
e op
erat
ive
CIR
MD
200
1 is
a c
ombi
ned
regi
onal
and
dis
trict
doc
umen
t und
er s
ectio
n 80
of t
he R
MA.
The
revi
ew o
f the
doc
umen
t and
the
prep
arat
ion
of th
e pr
opos
ed C
IRM
D 2
014
was
und
erta
ken
by th
e C
ounc
il in
acc
orda
nce
with
sec
tion
79 o
f the
RM
A.
2.
2 A
‘Sec
tion
32 R
epor
t’ da
ted
July
201
4 w
as p
repa
red
to e
valu
ate
effe
ctiv
enes
s an
d ef
ficie
ncy
of th
e pr
opos
ed a
men
dmen
ts to
the
exis
ting
CIR
MD
, and
to
take
acc
ount
of t
he d
ecis
ions
mad
e by
the
Cou
ncil
in re
latio
n to
the
docu
men
t.
2.
3 Th
e Se
ctio
n 32
Rep
ort s
tate
d th
at th
e C
ounc
il ha
d de
cide
d th
e ex
istin
g C
IRM
D w
as, w
ith m
inor
exc
eptio
ns, e
ffici
ent a
nd e
ffect
ive
in a
ddre
ssin
g th
e sc
ale
and
exte
nt o
f the
pla
nnin
g re
late
d is
sues
faci
ng th
e is
land
. It c
onsi
dere
d th
e pr
opos
ed C
IRM
D w
as e
ssen
tially
the
exis
ting
CIR
MD
with
am
endm
ents
to
brin
g it
up-to
-dat
e an
d to
rem
ove
anom
alie
s. I
t not
ed th
e pr
opos
ed C
IRM
D re
flect
ed th
e is
sues
affe
ctin
g th
e Is
land
s an
d th
e ve
ry lo
w le
vels
of a
ctiv
ity
that
hav
e ef
fect
s th
at n
eed
to b
e co
ntro
lled.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
3
2.4
The
Sect
ion
32 R
epor
t con
clud
ed th
at th
e as
sess
men
t of t
he p
ropo
sed
CIR
MD
und
er s
ectio
n 32
of t
he R
MA
(with
gui
danc
e pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e M
inis
try fo
r th
e En
viro
nmen
t) fo
und
the
obje
ctiv
es, p
olic
ies
and
met
hods
to b
e ge
nera
lly b
oth
effic
ient
and
effe
ctiv
e in
dea
ling
with
res
ourc
e m
anag
emen
t iss
ues
faci
ng th
e Is
land
s an
d th
e sc
ale
and
natu
re o
f the
effe
cts
that
are
like
ly to
eve
ntua
te.
3.0
NO
TIFI
CA
TON
/SU
BM
ISSI
ON
S/H
EAR
ING
N
otifi
catio
n/Su
bmis
sion
s 3.
1 Th
e PC
IRM
D w
as n
otifi
ed o
n 5t
h Au
gust
and
the
subm
issi
on p
erio
d cl
osed
on
the
3rd O
ctob
er 2
014.
A to
tal o
f sev
en s
ubm
issi
ons
wer
e re
ceiv
ed w
ithin
th
e tim
e pe
riod.
Th
e fu
rther
sub
mis
sion
per
iod
orig
inal
clo
sed
on 2
1st N
ovem
ber
2015
, bu
t w
as e
xten
ded
until
12th
Dec
embe
r 20
5.
Two
furth
er
subm
issi
ons
wer
e re
ceiv
ed w
ithin
the
time
perio
d.
3.2
Thes
e su
bmis
sion
s w
ere
help
fully
sum
mar
ised
and
com
men
ted
on in
the
Rep
ortin
g O
ffice
r’s re
port.
Prio
r to
the
hear
ing,
the
Rep
ortin
g O
ffice
r’s re
port
was
sen
t out
to a
ll pa
rties
. Th
e H
earin
g 3.
3 Th
e he
arin
g w
as h
eld
in th
e C
ounc
il of
fices
on
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
on 2
5th a
nd 2
6th F
ebru
ary
2015
. Th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
hea
rd fr
om th
e fo
llow
ing
peop
le d
urin
g th
e co
urse
of t
he h
earin
g:
S
ubm
itter
s ·
Dep
artm
ent o
f Con
serv
atio
n –
Ms
Con
nie
Nor
gate
and
Ms
Alis
on T
urne
r ·
Hok
oteh
i Mor
iori
Trus
t - M
r Mau
i Sol
omon
and
Ms
Susa
n Th
orpe
·
Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
Wha
reka
uri –
Mr W
ard
Kam
o ·
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
– M
s Ji
llian
Kenn
emor
e A
ttend
ance
on
beha
lf of
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Cou
ncil
· M
r Dav
id G
rego
ry, C
onsu
ltant
Pla
nner
·
Mr P
aul W
hyte
, Con
sulta
nt P
lann
er
3.4
The
hear
ing
was
ope
ned
at 9
.30a
m a
nd a
fter i
nitia
l int
rodu
ctio
ns a
nd p
roce
dura
l iss
ues,
Mr G
rego
ry ta
bled
his
repo
rt. M
r Gre
gory
and
Mr W
hyte
brie
fly
outli
ned
a nu
mbe
r of t
echn
ical
am
endm
ents
and
cha
nges
to th
e de
sign
atio
n se
ctio
n an
d pl
anni
ng m
aps.
In
rela
tion
to th
e in
clus
ion
of b
i-lin
gual
or t
ri-lin
gual
term
s th
roug
hout
the
docu
men
t, M
r Gre
gory
was
of t
he v
iew
that
this
was
a d
ecis
ion
for e
lect
ed m
embe
rs.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
4
3.5
Ms
Nor
gate
and
Ms
Turn
er s
poke
to th
e su
bmis
sion
of t
he D
epar
tmen
t of C
onse
rvat
ion
and
wer
e ac
com
pani
ed M
s Th
orpe
as
a C
onse
rvat
ion
Boa
rd
Mem
ber.
In
sum
mar
y, t
heir
subm
issi
on o
utlin
ed t
he n
eed
to a
ddre
ss t
he id
entif
icat
ion
and
man
agem
ent
of n
ew f
resh
wat
er p
est
plan
ts b
efor
e th
ey
esta
blis
h, c
ross
bou
ndar
y is
sues
and
the
need
for i
nteg
rate
d m
anag
emen
t, tim
efra
mes
for t
he im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e N
atio
nal P
olic
y St
atem
ent (
NPS
) fo
r Fr
eshw
ater
Man
agem
ent a
nd th
e N
ew Z
eala
nd C
oast
al P
olic
y St
atem
ent (
NZC
PS),
and
inte
grat
ion
with
the
Con
serv
atio
n M
anag
emen
t Stra
tegy
(C
MS)
. Th
ey e
xpre
ssed
a w
illing
ness
to p
rovi
de s
cien
tific
nam
es fo
r spe
cies
refe
rred
to in
the
docu
men
t and
for s
ugge
sted
incl
usio
ns, a
s re
ques
ted
in
the
subm
issi
on.
3.6
Ms
Kenn
emor
e sp
oke
to th
e su
bmis
sion
of H
erita
ge N
ew Z
eala
nd v
ia S
kype
. In
sum
mar
y, s
he a
ddre
ssed
the
stat
utor
y ba
ckgr
ound
, the
impo
rtanc
e of
th
e us
e of
non
-reg
ulat
ory
met
hods
(su
ch a
s a
Her
itage
Stra
tegy
), th
e ne
ed to
com
pile
an
inve
ntor
y of
her
itage
site
s, a
nd th
e ne
ed to
rec
ogni
se th
e C
hath
am I
slan
ds u
niqu
e co
ntex
t. S
he c
onfir
med
agr
eem
ent
that
no
furth
er h
erita
ge s
ites
shou
ld b
e in
clud
ed i
n th
e do
cum
ent
with
out
land
owne
r ag
reem
ent a
nd s
ugge
sted
a fu
ture
pla
n ch
ange
cou
ld in
corp
orat
e a
herit
age
inve
ntor
y.
3.
7 M
r Sol
omon
and
Ms
Thor
pe s
poke
to th
e su
bmis
sion
of H
okot
ehi M
orio
ri Tr
ust.
In s
umm
ary,
thei
r sub
mis
sion
add
ress
ed th
e la
ck o
f eng
agem
ent a
nd
cons
ulta
tion
with
Tch
akat
hen
u, im
i man
agem
ent
plan
s, p
rote
ctio
n of
his
toric
her
itage
, pr
otec
tion
of in
dige
nous
veg
etat
ion
and
land
scap
es,
was
te
man
agem
ent,
prot
ectio
n of
fres
hwat
er s
yste
ms,
Te
Wha
nga,
cos
tal m
arin
e en
viro
nmen
t, of
f sho
re is
land
s, a
men
ity v
alue
s, z
onin
g an
d pe
rmitt
ed a
ctiv
ities
an
d pl
anni
ng m
aps.
App
ende
d to
the
subm
issi
on w
ere
copi
es o
f var
ious
cor
resp
onde
nce
with
the
Cou
ncil,
info
rmat
ion
rela
ting
to th
e Ka
inga
roa
dum
p an
d th
e Ka
inga
roa
wat
er s
uppl
y ca
se s
tudi
es, a
nd a
doc
umen
t titl
ed ‘I
wi M
anag
emen
t Pla
ns –
A g
uide
for M
āori
wor
king
in re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t and
pl
anni
ng’ N
ew Z
eala
nd H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tr
ust P
ouhe
re T
aong
a S
usta
inab
le M
anag
emen
t of H
isto
ric H
erita
ge G
uida
nce
Ser
ies.
3.8
Mr K
amo
spok
e to
the
subm
issi
on o
f Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
Wha
reka
uri v
ia S
kype
. In
sum
mar
y, h
e ad
dres
sed
the
need
for a
goo
d w
orki
ng re
latio
nshi
p w
ith
the
Cou
ncil
and
the
impo
rtanc
e of
the
Trea
ty o
f Wai
tang
i/Te
Tirit
i o W
aita
ngi s
ettle
men
ts in
mov
ing
forw
ard;
the
need
to in
vest
igat
e th
e ec
olog
ical
effe
cts
of th
e op
enin
g th
e la
goon
and
man
agem
ent o
f sw
ans;
acc
ess
over
priv
ate
land
; and
reco
gniti
on o
f the
role
of i
wi i
n ho
usin
g de
velo
pmen
t on
the
Isla
nd.
3.9
A st
atem
ent f
rom
Mr C
hris
Nic
oll o
n be
half
of th
e N
ew Z
eala
nd F
ire S
ervi
ce w
as ta
bled
at t
he h
earin
g.
3.
10
We
hear
d fro
m s
ubm
itter
s ov
er th
e co
urse
of t
wo
days
and
the
hear
ing
was
adj
ourn
ed to
ena
ble
the
Rep
ortin
g O
ffice
r to
prov
ide
a w
ritte
n rig
ht o
f rep
ly.
A w
ritte
n rig
ht o
f rep
ly w
as re
ceiv
ed o
n 16
th A
pril
2015
.
3.
11
Afte
r co
nsid
erin
g th
e su
bmis
sion
s ra
ised
and
the
Rep
ortin
g O
ffice
r’s r
espo
nse
to th
ese
subm
issi
ons,
we
issu
ed a
min
ute
to p
roce
edin
gs r
eque
stin
g H
okot
ehi M
orio
ri Tr
ust t
o pr
ovid
e su
gges
ted
wor
ding
for a
revi
sed
sect
ion
3.3
“Iwi P
ersp
ectiv
e’ a
nd th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
onse
rvat
ion
to p
rovi
de s
cien
tific
na
mes
for p
lant
s re
ferr
ed to
in th
e do
cum
ent.
3.
12
Follo
win
g re
ceip
t of t
hese
res
pons
es, t
he R
epor
ting
Offi
cer r
ecom
men
ded
a re
vise
d se
ctio
n 3.
3 an
d ci
rcul
ated
this
to N
gāti
Mut
unga
o W
hare
kaur
i for
co
mm
ent.
Com
men
t was
rece
ived
on
26th J
une
and
the
hear
ing
was
clo
sed
on 2
9th J
une
2015
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
5
Scop
e of
Sub
mis
sion
s
3.13
W
e ar
e re
quire
d to
lim
it ou
r rep
ort a
nd d
ecis
ions
to th
e m
atte
rs ra
ised
in s
ubm
issi
ons
and
the
chan
ges
soug
ht to
the
prop
osed
CIR
MD
. W
e no
te th
at a
nu
mbe
r of
mat
ters
rai
sed
by th
e H
okot
ehi M
orio
ri Tr
ust i
n th
e he
arin
g w
ere
not s
peci
fical
ly r
aise
d in
the
orig
inal
sub
mis
sion
. In
parti
cula
r, th
e Tr
ust’s
su
bmis
sion
did
not
rais
e co
ncer
n re
gard
ing
the
‘offe
nsiv
enes
s’ o
f any
pro
visi
ons
of th
e pl
an, n
or d
id it
sug
gest
any
alte
rnat
ive
wor
ding
. Whi
le re
fere
nce
was
mad
e to
‘no
furth
er c
onta
ct a
nd n
o di
scus
sion
or
oppo
rtuni
ty fo
r in
put i
nto
the
cont
ent o
f the
pla
n’ fo
llow
ing
mee
ting
with
Mr
Edw
ard
Ellis
on, n
o sp
ecifi
c su
bmis
sion
was
mad
e in
rela
tion
to la
ck o
f eng
agem
ent o
r con
sulta
tion.
It i
s th
eref
ore
diffi
cult
to a
ddre
ss th
ese
mat
ters
with
in th
e sc
ope
of th
is
plan
revi
ew p
roce
ss.
3.
14
In m
akin
g ou
r del
iber
atio
ns, w
e ar
e m
indf
ul o
f the
sco
pe o
f our
con
side
ratio
n an
d w
e ha
ve e
ndea
vour
ed to
acc
omm
odat
e th
e re
ques
t of t
he H
okot
ehi
Mor
iori
Trus
t by
allo
win
g fo
r an
upda
te to
the
wor
ding
of s
ectio
n 3.
3 ‘Iw
i Per
spec
tives
’. W
e co
nsid
er th
is is
with
in th
e sc
ope
of a
sub
mis
sion
poi
nt m
ade
by N
gāti
Mut
unga
o W
hare
kaur
i reg
ardi
ng th
e ne
ed to
refle
ct th
e di
stin
ct c
ultu
ral i
dent
ities
of b
oth
Mor
iori
and
Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
Wha
reka
uri i
n th
is s
ectio
n of
the
docu
men
t. W
e ar
e sa
tisfie
d th
e re
visi
on p
ropo
sed
upda
tes
the
docu
men
t to
refle
ct c
urre
nt im
i/iw
i per
spec
tives
and
doe
s no
t affe
ct th
e su
bsta
nce
or in
tent
of a
ny o
f the
pro
visi
ons.
4.0
ASS
ESSM
ENT
OF
SUB
MIS
SIO
NS
4.
1 In
ass
essi
ng th
e su
bmis
sion
poi
nts
and
chan
ges
soug
ht, w
e ha
ve c
onsi
dere
d al
l the
sub
mis
sion
s re
ceiv
ed a
nd e
vide
nce
pres
ente
d du
ring
and
afte
r the
he
arin
g. O
ur d
ecis
ions
and
reas
ons
for t
hose
dec
isio
ns a
re s
et o
ut in
App
endi
x 1
of th
is re
port.
4.
2 A
ppen
dix
2 of
this
rep
ort c
onta
ins
the
Prop
osed
CIR
MD
with
the
deci
sion
am
endm
ents
sho
wn
as tr
acke
d ch
ange
s. W
here
doc
umen
t wid
e ch
ange
s ha
ve b
een
mad
e to
cha
nge
term
s su
ch a
s “iw
i” to
“iw
i/im
i”, th
ese
chan
ges
have
onl
y be
en s
how
n ha
s tra
cked
cha
nges
the
first
tim
e th
e w
ord
is u
sed.
Tr
acke
d ch
ange
s ha
ve n
ot b
een
show
n w
here
min
or c
orre
ctio
ns a
nd p
unct
uatio
n ch
ange
hav
e be
en m
ade,
or w
here
sci
entif
ic n
ames
hav
e be
en in
clud
ed
to a
ssis
t with
read
abilit
y of
the
docu
men
t.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
6
5.0
DEC
ISIO
N
5.1
Hav
ing
cons
ider
ed a
ll su
bmis
sion
s an
d ev
iden
ce p
rese
nted
at t
he h
earin
g, w
e re
solv
e th
at th
e Pr
opos
ed C
hath
am Is
land
s R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent P
lan
be a
men
ded,
as
show
n in
App
endi
x 2
of th
is re
port.
D
ATED
AT
CH
RIS
TCH
UR
CH
TH
IS 3
0th D
AY O
F JU
NE
2015
Sh
aron
McG
arry
(Cha
ir)
O
n be
half
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
7
Hea
rings
Com
mitt
ee’s
Dec
isio
ns o
n Su
bmis
sion
s and
Fur
ther
Sub
mis
sion
s to
the
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent D
ocum
ent
Hok
oteh
i Mor
iori
Tru
st (H
MT
)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns R
eque
sted
Fu
rthe
r Su
bmis
sion
: Su
ppor
t/Opp
ose
Rec
omm
enda
tion:
A
ccep
t/Par
tly
Acc
ept/R
ejec
t
Off
icer
’s R
ight
of R
eply
D
ecis
ion
and
Rea
sons
Part
3.3
Iwi
Pers
pect
ive
• D
ecis
ion
requ
este
d at
the
Hea
ring:
R
ewrit
e Se
ctio
n 3.
3,
Iwi P
ersp
ectiv
e
N
o re
com
men
datio
n m
ade
beca
use
was
not
a
spec
ific
mat
ter r
aise
d in
or
igin
al su
bmis
sion
.
Wha
t is r
eque
sted
re
pres
ents
a la
rge
chan
ge
to th
e C
IRM
D w
hich
was
no
t spe
cific
ally
requ
este
d in
subm
issi
ons,
but i
t is
acce
pted
that
ther
e ar
e so
me
cultu
ral c
once
rns
rega
rdin
g th
is se
ctio
n. In
or
der t
o ad
dres
s the
se
conc
erns
, the
C
omm
issi
oner
s may
co
nsid
er re
ques
ting
that
H
okot
ehi M
orio
ri Tr
ust,
in
conj
unct
ion
with
Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
Wha
reka
uri,
prep
are
a re
writ
ten
Sect
ion
3.3
for c
onsi
dera
tion
of th
e co
mm
issi
oner
s.
Part
ly a
ccep
t Hok
oteh
i M
orio
ri Tr
ust’s
rew
ritte
n se
ctio
n 3.
3. A
lthou
gh n
ot
a sp
ecifi
c su
bmis
sion
po
int,
we
cons
ider
this
re
visi
on o
f sec
tion
3.3,
w
ith c
omm
ent f
rom
Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
Wha
reka
uri t
o be
an
agre
ed c
orre
ctio
n or
up
date
of ‘
iwi
pers
pect
ive’
.
Part
4, 4
.1
The
Iwi
• D
evel
op a
MO
U
betw
een
Cou
ncil
and
the
Trus
t on
Pa
rtly
acc
ept:
Dev
elop
men
t of a
MO
U
is a
pro
cess
that
lies
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n.
Part
ly a
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
s req
uire
d. T
he
deve
lopm
ent o
f a M
OU
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
8
plan
ning
mat
ters
and
pr
oces
ses a
nd to
pr
ovid
e fo
r a
sepa
rate
imi
plan
ning
inst
rum
ent
outs
ide
the
CIR
MD
and
is
pos
sibl
e un
der c
urre
nt
polic
ies a
nd m
etho
ds in
Pa
rt 4.
1 (4
.1.3
(i)),
“The
Iw
i”.
Whi
le lo
cal a
utho
ritie
s m
ust t
ake
into
acc
ount
“a
ny re
leva
nt p
lann
ing
docu
men
t rec
ogni
sed
by
an iw
i aut
horit
y” (R
MA
S7
4(2A
)) th
at d
ocum
ent
mus
t be
lodg
ed w
ith th
e TL
A. C
urre
ntly
, no
such
do
cum
ents
are
kno
wn
to
exis
t. Pa
rtly
acc
ept:
Cur
rent
po
licie
s and
met
hods
in
Part
4.1,
“Th
e Iw
i”
(4.1
.3(ii
i)) a
llow
for
man
agem
ent p
lans
.
and
an im
i pla
nnin
g in
stru
men
t are
out
side
the
CIR
MD
. Th
e C
IRM
D
reco
gnis
es su
ch p
lann
ing
inst
rum
ents
4.1.
2(iii
) 2)
Mec
hani
sm o
r in
cent
ives
for
prot
ectio
n of
waa
hi
tapu
or p
lace
s of
sign
ifica
nce
Pa
rtly
acc
ept:
Cur
rent
po
licie
s and
met
hods
in
Part
4.1,
“Th
e Iw
i” a
nd in
C
IRM
D R
ules
pro
vide
fo
r pro
tect
ion.
How
ever
pr
ovis
ion
of “
ince
ntiv
es”
is c
onsi
dere
d to
be
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n Pa
rtly
acc
ept.
No
chan
ge re
quire
d.
Met
hods
such
as u
sing
in
cent
ives
are
not
pr
eclu
ded
by th
e C
IRM
D
prov
isio
ns.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
9
beyo
nd th
e re
sour
ces o
f th
e C
ounc
il 4.
2.1
and
4.2.
2 3)
Mec
hani
sm o
r in
cent
ives
for r
ipar
ian
prot
ectio
n an
d na
tura
l ch
arac
ter p
rote
ctio
n pl
us a
ssis
tanc
e to
en
hanc
ing
ecos
yste
ms
Pa
rtly
acc
ept:
Mec
hani
sms a
lread
y ex
ist
with
in th
e C
IRM
D fo
r rip
aria
n pr
otec
tion
(e.g
. Pa
rt 4.
4 “I
ndig
enou
s ve
geta
tion
and
habi
tats
of
faun
a”).
How
ever
pr
ovis
ion
of in
cent
ives
is
cons
ider
ed to
be
beyo
nd
the
reso
urce
s of t
he
Cou
ncil
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n Pa
rtly
acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
M
etho
ds su
ch a
s usi
ng
ince
ntiv
es a
re n
ot
prec
lude
d by
the
CIR
MD
pr
ovis
ions
.
4.11
.1.1
4)
Reh
abili
tatio
n pl
ans
for t
he K
aing
aroa
dum
p
Acc
ept:
In 4
.11.
1.2
Met
hods
add
a M
etho
d (v
) as f
ollo
ws,
“ D
evel
op
reha
bilit
atio
n pl
ans f
or
the
Kai
ngar
oa, O
wen
ga
and
Te O
ne la
ndfil
ls”
(or
sim
ilar)
. A
CIC
su
bmis
sion
to th
e C
IRM
D in
resp
ect o
f Se
ctio
n 4.
11
ackn
owle
dges
the
clos
ure
of th
e ab
ove
land
fills
w
ith th
e op
erat
ion
of th
e ne
w la
ndfil
l and
it is
ap
prop
riate
to in
clud
e re
fere
nce
to re
habi
litat
ion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. A
dd M
etho
d (v
) as
reco
mm
ende
d by
the
Rep
ortin
g O
ffic
er.
Con
side
r thi
s ref
lect
s the
re
sour
ce c
onse
nt
cond
ition
s for
the
new
la
ndfil
l.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
10
plan
s for
the
exis
ting
land
fills
. 5.
3.4
5) R
ules
for T
e W
haan
ga sh
ould
in
clud
e “n
o ad
vers
e ef
fect
on
Mor
iori
valu
es”
HN
Z su
ppor
t R
ejec
t: R
ules
, e.
g.
5.3.
4.23
(d)
alre
ady
prov
ide
for “
The
effe
ct o
n cu
ltura
l val
ues”
and
this
is
cons
ider
ed
to
incl
ude
Mor
iori
valu
es.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. R
ules
ade
quat
ely
addr
ess e
ffec
ts o
n cu
ltura
l va
lues
.
4.5.
1.1
6) S
uppo
rt fo
r vo
lunt
ary
prot
ectio
n of
si
gnifi
cant
veg
etat
ion
and
habi
tat
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
CIR
MD
pr
ovis
ions
ena
ble
this
to
occu
r. 4.
5 7)
Site
s and
land
scap
es
shou
ld b
e ad
ded
to
herit
age
item
s
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
Oth
er
subm
itter
s hav
e so
ught
si
mila
r add
ition
s. C
ounc
il se
eks h
elp
in id
entif
ying
ar
eas
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n. It
is
cons
ider
ed th
at C
ounc
il sh
ould
con
vene
a g
roup
of
isla
nd in
tere
sts t
o co
nsid
er
this
mat
ter f
urth
er o
utsi
de
the
revi
ew p
roce
ss, n
otin
g th
at th
ere
appe
ared
to b
e su
ppor
t for
this
con
cept
.
Part
ly a
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
requ
ired.
CIR
MD
pr
ovis
ions
allo
w a
co
llabo
rativ
e pr
oces
s to
occu
r.
Polic
y 4.
1.2
8) P
olic
y 4.
1.2
shou
ld
refe
r to
prot
ectin
g si
tes
from
all
adve
rse
effe
cts
R
ejec
t: It
is n
ot
cons
ider
ed p
ossi
ble
to
prot
ect s
ites f
rom
“al
l”
adve
rse
effe
cts a
s som
e of
thes
e ef
fect
s will
lie
outs
ide
cont
rol.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. T
he R
MA
is n
ot
a “n
o ef
fect
s” st
atut
e. I
t w
ould
be
inap
prop
riate
to
incl
ude
“all”
adv
erse
ef
fect
s.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
11
Gen
eral
9)
Cov
enan
ts sh
ould
be
enco
urag
ed th
roug
h ra
tes r
elie
f
R
ejec
t: Th
e C
IRM
D
stat
es in
2.2
.3(ii
) tha
t C
ounc
il is
not
in a
n ec
onom
ic p
ositi
on to
of
fer r
ates
relie
f.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. M
etho
ds su
ch a
s ra
tes r
elie
f are
not
pr
eclu
ded
by th
e C
IRM
D
plan
pro
visi
ons.
M
etho
ds
4.1.
3
10)
Off
-sho
re is
land
s:
Met
hod
4.1.
3 sh
ould
in
clud
e m
anag
emen
t by
tang
ata
whe
nua
HN
Z su
ppor
t R
ejec
t: M
etho
d 4.
1.3(
iii)
alre
ady
allo
ws f
or th
is
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n.
Dis
cuss
ion
at th
e he
arin
g in
dica
ted
that
man
agem
ent
by “
owne
rs”,
in th
is c
ase
fam
ilies
, is m
ore
appr
opria
te
Rej
ect.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
It is
app
ropr
iate
th
at th
at m
anag
emen
t pl
ans a
llow
off
shor
e is
land
s to
be m
anag
ed b
y th
eir “
owne
rs”.
App
endi
x 3
11) T
he a
ppen
dix
on
herit
age
valu
es n
eeds
to
incl
ude
area
s of
herit
age
valu
es
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
Oth
er
subm
itter
s hav
e so
ught
si
mila
r add
ition
s. C
ounc
il se
eks h
elp
in id
entif
ying
ar
eas.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n. It
is
cons
ider
ed th
at C
ounc
il sh
ould
con
vene
a g
roup
of
isla
nd in
tere
sts t
o co
nsid
er
this
mat
ter f
urth
er o
utsi
de
the
revi
ew p
roce
ss, n
otin
g th
at th
ere
appe
ared
to b
e su
ppor
t for
this
con
cept
.
Part
ly A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
requ
ired.
CIR
MD
pr
ovis
ions
allo
w a
co
llabo
rativ
e pr
oces
s to
occu
r.
Gen
eral
12
) Red
raft
map
s in
cons
ulta
tion
with
ta
ngat
a w
henu
a, D
OC
an
d H
erita
ge N
Z
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
Whe
re
addi
tions
or a
men
dmen
ts
are
agre
ed to
map
s, ap
prop
riate
con
sulta
tion
can
be c
arrie
d ou
t.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n. It
is
cons
ider
ed th
at C
ounc
il sh
ould
con
vene
a g
roup
of
isla
nd in
tere
sts t
o co
nsid
er
this
mat
ter f
urth
er o
utsi
de
the
revi
ew p
roce
ss, n
otin
g
Part
ly A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
requ
ired.
No
spec
ific
amen
dmen
ts w
ere
requ
este
d. I
t is
appr
opria
te to
und
erta
ke a
co
llabo
rativ
e ap
proa
ch to
co
nsid
er th
is m
atte
r is
nece
ssar
y.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
12
that
ther
e ap
pear
ed to
be
supp
ort f
or th
is c
once
pt.
Gen
eral
13
) All
plac
e na
mes
to
be b
i-lin
gual
or t
ri-lin
gual
whe
re
appr
opria
te
R
ejec
t: Pl
ace
nam
es o
n m
aps f
ollo
w N
Z m
ap
nam
es. A
ny a
dditi
onal
na
mes
will
requ
ire
agre
emen
t of a
ll in
tere
sted
gro
ups.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n. H
owev
er
it is
con
side
red
appr
opria
te
to in
sert
the
term
“im
i”
with
“iw
i”. I
t may
als
o be
ap
prop
riate
to re
plac
e th
e te
rm “
Mor
iori”
with
“t
chak
at h
enu”
but
sugg
est
that
HM
T ad
vise
furth
er o
n th
is a
s par
t of t
heir
sugg
este
d 3.
3 dr
aftin
g.
Part
ly A
ccep
t. T
he
subm
itter
did
no
prov
ided
an
y sp
ecifi
c ch
ange
s to
the
plac
e na
mes
for
cons
ider
atio
n. C
hang
es to
in
sert
to te
rms “
imi/i
wi”
, “T
e tir
iti o
Wai
tang
i” a
nd
revi
sed
wor
ding
of
sect
ion
3.3
are
appr
opria
te.
14
) Pla
n to
incl
ude
NZA
A u
pgra
de d
ata
R
ejec
t: It
is u
ncle
ar w
hat
is so
ught
thro
ugh
this
po
int
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n. A
t the
he
arin
g it
was
app
aren
t th
at p
rogr
ess o
f the
“u
pgra
de”
on th
e C
hath
am
Isla
nds w
as u
ncer
tain
and
th
at th
is n
eede
d to
be
clar
ified
.
Rej
ect.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
No
evid
ence
pr
ovid
ed o
n w
hat
“upg
rade
dat
a” sh
ould
be
incl
uded
.
Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
Wha
reka
uri (
NM
W)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns R
eque
sted
G
ener
al
• R
eque
st
supp
lem
enta
ry p
aper
on
impe
ndin
g R
MA
ch
ange
s
R
ejec
t: Th
is is
not
par
t of
a st
atut
ory
plan
. The
C
IRM
D c
anno
t be
boun
d
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n.
Rej
ect.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
The
revi
ew
proc
ess m
ust c
onsi
der
the
RM
A p
rovi
sion
s in
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
13
by sp
ecul
ativ
e po
ssib
le
futu
re le
gisl
ativ
e ch
ange
s pl
ace
at th
e tim
e of
the
deci
sion
. Pa
rt 4
, 4.1
, T
he Iw
i •
Inse
rt th
e fo
llow
ing
wor
ding
: “C
ounc
il w
ill w
ork
clos
ely
with
th
ese
grou
ps w
here
pr
actic
able
in re
spec
t of
reso
urce
m
anag
emen
t is
sues
…”
HN
Z su
ppor
t R
ejec
t: Se
ctio
n 4.
1 al
read
y pr
ovid
es fo
r w
orki
ng w
ith iw
i gro
ups,
e.g.
Met
hod
4.1.
3(i)
Acc
ept:
In
Part
2, 2
.2
Invo
lvem
ent o
f Iw
i, am
end
the
seco
nd
sent
ence
of t
he p
arag
raph
to
read
: “C
ounc
il w
ill
cons
ult a
nd w
ork
with
th
ese
grou
ps in
resp
ect o
f re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t is
sues
that
aff
ect t
he
isla
nds,
incl
udin
g re
sour
ce
cons
ents
.”
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Sect
ion
2.2
to re
ad -
“Cou
ncil
will
con
sult
with
and
w
ork
with
thes
e gr
oup…
”
Gen
eral
•
Enco
urag
e C
ounc
il
to in
clud
e ed
ucat
iona
l in
tera
ctio
n as
a
Met
hod
HN
Z su
ppor
t R
ejec
t: A
lthou
gh d
irect
in
volv
emen
t of s
choo
ls is
no
t men
tione
d in
the
CIR
MD
, the
term
“e
duca
tion”
is w
idel
y us
ed in
the
Met
hods
, e.g
. 4.
11.1
.2 M
etho
ds, (
i) Ed
ucat
ion
and
advi
ce o
n go
od w
aste
dis
posa
l pr
actic
es.
Acc
ept:
In 2
.3 M
etho
ds,
final
sent
ence
of M
etho
d (iv
) am
end
the
sent
ence
to
area
s: “
Dis
sem
inat
ion
of
info
rmat
ion,
edu
catio
n (e
.g. l
ocat
ion
of b
ird
nest
ing
site
s and
rare
pl
ants
) is p
art o
f the
pr
oces
s”
Acc
ept.
Am
end
2.3
Met
hod
(iv) t
o re
ad -
“Dis
sem
inat
ion
of
info
rmat
ion,
(e.g
. lo
catio
n of
bird
nes
ting
site
s and
rare
pla
nts)
ed
ucat
ion
are
is p
art o
f th
e pr
oces
s”
Gen
eral
•
Use
the
term
, “N
gāti
Mut
unga
o
Wha
reka
uri”
rath
er
than
Mao
ri
HN
Z su
ppor
t A
ccep
t: W
here
the
term
“M
aori”
occ
urs i
n th
e C
IRM
D, r
epla
ce w
ith
“Ngā
ti M
utun
ga o
W
hare
kaur
i
It is
sugg
este
d th
is m
atte
r is
add
ress
ed in
the
sugg
este
d 3.
3 re
draf
ting.
Acc
ept.
Thi
s has
bee
n ad
dres
sed
in th
e re
vise
d se
ctio
n 3.
3 an
d w
here
ap
prop
riate
in th
roug
hout
th
e do
cum
ent i
n
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
14
conj
unct
ion
with
the
chan
ges s
ough
t by
HM
T.
Gen
eral
•
Upd
ate
cens
us fi
gure
s to
201
3
Acc
ept:
Whe
re C
ensu
s da
ta is
use
d (e
.g. i
n 3.
3.1)
up
date
to th
e 20
13 C
ensu
s
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. R
efer
ence
to
Cen
sus d
ata
has b
een
rem
oved
by
revi
sion
of
sect
ion
3.3.
Po
licy
4.2.
4.1
• Po
licy
4.2.
4.1.
Fu
rther
stud
y on
ar
tific
ial o
peni
ng v
s na
tura
l pro
cess
es
R
ejec
t: Th
is is
alre
ady
prov
ided
for i
n M
etho
d 4.
2.4.
2(iii
)
Acc
ept:
In M
etho
d 4.
2.4.
2(iii
) am
end
the
Met
hod
to re
ad:
“Und
erta
ke st
udie
s on
the
func
tioni
ng o
f the
lago
on
and
the
effe
cts o
f nat
ural
an
d ar
tific
ial o
peni
ng.”
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Met
hod
4.2.
4.2
(iii)
to re
ad -
“Und
erta
ke st
udie
s on
the
func
tioni
ng o
f the
la
goon
and
the
effe
cts o
f na
tura
l and
art
ifici
al
open
ing.
”
4.2.
4.1
• A
dditi
onal
re
cogn
ition
of T
reat
y m
atte
r for
Te
Wha
nga
R
ejec
t: It
is c
onsi
dere
d th
at th
e ex
istin
g Po
licie
s an
d M
etho
ds p
rovi
de
adeq
uate
reco
gniti
on o
f iw
i mat
ters
.
Acc
ept:
In O
bjec
tive
4.2.
4(i)
add
in th
e th
ird
bulle
t poi
nt: “
Iwi v
alue
s an
d re
latio
nshi
ps”.
In
Polic
y 4.
2.4.
1(ii)
add
in
the
seco
nd b
ulle
t poi
nt:
“Iw
i val
ues a
nd
rela
tions
hips
”
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Obj
ectiv
e 4.
2.4(
i), t
hird
bu
llet p
oint
to re
ad -
“Iw
i va
lues
and
re
latio
nshi
ps”;
and
Po
licy
4.2.
4.1(
ii), s
econ
d bu
llet p
oint
to re
ad -
“Iw
i va
lues
and
re
latio
nshi
ps”.
4.
2.1.
2 •
Stre
ngth
en in
tent
on
prot
ectio
n an
d re
plan
ting
of ri
paria
n st
rips
R
ejec
t: It
is
cons
ider
ed
that
the
exi
stin
g Po
licie
s an
d M
etho
ds
prov
ide
adeq
uate
inte
nt w
ithin
the
reso
urce
s of t
he C
ounc
il.
Acc
ept:
Del
ete
Met
hod
4.2.
1.2
and
repl
ace
with
th
e w
ordi
ng o
f Met
hod
4.2.
2.2
to re
ad:
“Enc
oura
ging
land
owne
rs
to p
rote
ct n
atur
al v
alue
s
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Met
hod
4.2.
1.2
(iii)
to
read
–
“Enc
oura
ging
la
ndow
ners
to
pr
otec
t na
tura
l va
lues
by
priv
ate
agre
emen
ts, c
onse
rvat
ion
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
15
by p
riva
te a
gree
men
ts,
cons
erva
tion
cove
nant
s, fe
ncin
g an
d pl
antin
g of
m
argi
ns.”
cove
nant
s, fe
ncin
g an
d pl
antin
g of
mar
gins
, and
us
e of
gu
idel
ines
an
d ed
ucat
ion.
4.
1.2
• A
ckno
wle
dge
iwi i
n re
latio
n to
eco
nom
ic
and
soci
al
deve
lopm
ents
R
ejec
t: Th
is se
ctio
n de
als
with
the
man
agem
ent o
f re
sour
ces a
nd p
rovi
des
reco
gniti
on o
f Iw
i and
the
Trea
ty.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
s re
quire
d. T
his s
ectio
n ad
equa
tely
add
ress
es iw
i in
rela
tion
to m
anag
ing
natu
ral a
nd p
hysi
cal
reso
urce
s. 3.
6 N
atur
al
feat
ures
• Ex
pand
fina
l sen
tenc
e (P
g 20
, fin
al p
ara)
to
emph
asis
e th
at
pres
erva
tion
has
bene
fits.
A
lso
appl
ies t
o H
erita
ge It
ems
A
ccep
t: A
dd to
the
final
se
nten
ce o
f 3.6
.1 to
read
: “R
eten
tion
of n
atur
al
reso
urce
s has
ben
efits
for
the
com
mun
ity in
term
s of
the
char
acte
r of t
he
isla
nds,
amen
ity v
alue
s, vi
sual
app
reci
atio
n,
cons
erva
tion,
eco
nom
ic
and
soci
al d
evel
opm
ent
and
as a
n at
tract
ion
for
visi
tors
.” O
r wor
ds to
that
ef
fect
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. A
men
d fin
al
sent
ence
of 3
.6.1
to re
ad:
“Ret
entio
n of
nat
ural
re
sour
ces h
as b
enef
its fo
r th
e co
mm
unity
in te
rms
of th
e ch
arac
ter o
f the
is
land
s, am
enity
val
ues,
visu
al a
ppre
ciat
ion,
co
nser
vatio
n, e
cono
mic
an
d so
cial
dev
elop
men
t an
d as
an
attra
ctio
n fo
r vi
sito
rs.”
Met
hod
4.5.
1.2(
iv)
• M
etho
d 4.
5.1.
2 (iv
) cl
arify
“ce
rtain
ci
rcum
stan
ces”
as
curr
ently
too
broa
d
R
ejec
t: It
is n
ot
cons
ider
ed p
ossi
ble
to
defin
e th
e ra
nge
of
circ
umst
ance
s in
whi
ch
the
appl
icat
ion
of ru
les
mig
ht b
e de
emed
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. A
men
d M
etho
d 4.
5.1.
2(iv
) to
read
–
“Reg
ulat
e by
rule
s as
requ
ired
by
prov
isio
ns o
f th
is p
lan.
” It
is
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
16
nece
ssar
y. O
ther
term
s su
ch a
s “if
nece
ssar
y”
coul
d be
con
side
red,
but
m
ay a
ttrac
t the
sam
e ob
ject
ion
cons
ider
ed th
is a
dditi
on
clar
ifies
the
met
hod.
Polic
y 4.
6.1.
1(iv
) •
Exp
and
Polic
y 4.
6.1.
1 (iv
) to
incl
ude
wah
i tap
u an
d no
hoan
ga k
ai
A
ccep
t:
In
Polic
y 4.
6.1.
1(iv
) ad
d,
“To
cons
ult
with
Iw
i pr
ior
to
any
deve
lopm
ent
upon
di
scov
ery
of u
rupa
, w
ahi
tapu
an
d no
hoan
ga
kai
rem
ains
.”
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. A
men
d Po
licy
4.6.
1.1
(iv)
to r
ead
- “T
o co
nsul
t w
ith I
wi
prio
r to
an
y de
velo
pmen
t up
on
disc
over
y of
uru
pa, w
ahi
tapu
and
noh
oang
a ka
i re
mai
ns.”
3.8
• Es
tabl
ish
regi
ster
of
land
owne
r con
tact
s for
ac
cess
per
mis
sion
R
ejec
t: It
is c
onsi
dere
d th
at su
ch a
s a re
gist
er is
be
st p
rovi
ded
outs
ide
a st
atut
ory
docu
men
t. A
pl
an c
hang
e w
ould
be
requ
ired
to a
dd o
r rem
ove
deta
ils.
Part
ly A
ccep
t: It
is
cons
ider
ed th
at su
ch a
re
gist
er is
bes
t pro
vide
d ou
tsid
e a
stat
utor
y do
cum
ent.
A p
lan
chan
ge
will
oth
erw
ise
be re
quire
d to
add
or r
emov
e de
tails
.
Part
ly A
ccep
t. It
is n
ot
appr
opria
te to
hav
e a
regi
ster
of l
ando
wne
r co
ntac
ts in
a st
atut
ory
docu
men
t. H
owev
er, t
he
text
cou
ld b
e cl
eare
r re
gard
ing
the
need
to
seek
land
owne
r pe
rmis
sion
. Am
end
last
se
ntie
nce
of se
ctio
n 4.
7.1
Rea
sons
to re
ad –
“G
ener
ally
acc
ess i
s ac
ross
pri
vate
land
and
ac
cess
is a
t the
la
ndow
ner’
s dis
cret
ion
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
17
and
perm
issi
on sh
ould
be
soug
ht.”
3.
9 •
Iwi m
embe
rs to
be
train
ed in
haz
ard
miti
gatio
n
R
ejec
t: Th
e se
lect
ion
and
train
ing
of a
ppro
pria
te
pers
onne
l is c
onsi
dere
d to
be
a m
atte
r tha
t sho
uld
lie
outs
ide
a st
atut
ory
docu
men
t.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. W
e ag
ree
sele
ctio
n an
d tra
inin
g of
ap
prop
riate
per
sonn
el is
no
t a m
atte
r to
be
incl
uded
in a
stat
utor
y do
cum
ent.
3.10
•
Do
mor
e to
enc
oura
ge
bette
r was
te
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
, dom
estic
an
d co
mm
erci
al
R
ejec
t: It
is c
onsi
dere
d th
at th
e M
etho
ds u
nder
Se
ctio
n 4.
11.1
.2 (i
) to
(iv)
are
adeq
uate
pro
visi
ons.
Acc
ept:
Am
end
Met
hod
unde
r Sec
tion
4.11
.1.2
(i)
to a
dd “
man
agem
ent”
be
twee
n “w
aste
” an
d “d
ispo
sal”
. A
men
d M
etho
d (ii
i) to
re
ad: “
Impl
emen
t the
W
aste
Man
agem
ent
Stra
tegy
, inc
ludi
ng so
rtin
g an
d re
cycl
ing.
”
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Met
hod
unde
r Sec
tion
4.11
.1.2
(i)
to re
ad –
“Ed
ucat
ion
and
advi
ce o
n go
od w
aste
m
anag
emen
t and
di
spos
al p
ract
ices
”; a
nd
Met
hod
(iii)
to re
ad:
“Im
plem
ent t
he W
aste
M
anag
emen
t Stra
tegy
, in
clud
ing
sort
ing
and
recy
clin
g.”
Gen
eral
•
Take
into
acc
ount
fu
ndin
g of
soci
al
hous
ing
initi
ativ
es
and
chan
ges t
o th
e R
MA
R
ejec
t: Fu
ndin
g of
soci
al
hous
ing
initi
ativ
es a
re b
est
cons
ider
ed o
utsi
de a
st
atut
ory
docu
men
t. Po
tent
ial c
hang
es to
the
RM
A c
anno
t be
cons
ider
ed in
the
CIR
MD
as
they
are
cur
rent
ly
spec
ulat
ion.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d.
We
agre
e th
at
thes
e m
atte
rs a
re b
est
addr
esse
d ou
tsid
e th
e C
IRM
D.
We
mus
t co
nsid
er th
e R
MA
pr
ovis
ions
at t
he ti
me
of
this
dec
isio
n.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
18
4.13
•
Set d
evel
opm
ent
cont
ribut
ions
on
a va
riabl
e ba
sis
R
ejec
t: Th
e C
ounc
il ha
s a
limite
d fu
ndin
g ba
se a
nd
seek
s to
cove
r the
full
and
actu
al c
osts
of m
ost
infr
astru
ctur
al w
orks
oc
casi
oned
by
deve
lopm
ent
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. W
e co
nsid
er
such
mat
ters
can
be
cons
ider
ed o
n a
case
-by-
case
bas
is d
urin
g an
y co
nsen
t pro
cess
.
5.3
• Zo
ning
shou
ld n
ot b
e rig
id (R
ural
Zon
e)
R
ejec
t: In
ord
er to
mak
e it
clea
r whe
re a
nd w
hen
the
plan
app
lies,
it is
ne
cess
ary
to c
lear
ly
dem
ark
the
boun
darie
s be
twee
n zo
nes.
How
ever
, zo
ne b
ound
arie
s can
be
adju
sted
thro
ugh
publ
ic
and
priv
ate
plan
cha
nges
.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
s re
quire
d. Z
onin
g is
an
acce
pted
reso
urce
m
anag
emen
t met
hod.
Zo
ne b
ound
arie
s can
be
chan
ged
thro
ugh
the
appr
opria
te R
MA
pla
n ch
ange
pro
cess
.
5.4
• W
ork
with
the
Trus
t on
hou
sing
initi
ativ
es
(Set
tlem
ent Z
one)
R
ejec
t: Jo
int w
orki
ng
arra
ngem
ents
are
bes
t ar
rived
at o
utsi
de th
e st
atut
ory
docu
men
t.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. T
hese
mat
ters
ca
n be
add
ress
ed o
utsi
de
the
stat
utor
y do
cum
ent.
5.6.
3.1
• C
onsi
der p
olic
y on
ex
tern
al th
reat
s to
life
supp
ortin
g ca
paci
ty
(Coa
stal
Mar
ine
Are
a)
A
ccep
t: C
onsi
der
incl
udin
g a
Polic
y w
ith
the
follo
win
g w
ordi
ng,
“Whe
re a
ctiv
ities
seaw
ard
of th
e co
asta
l mar
ine
area
re
quir
e co
nsen
t und
er th
e Ex
clus
ive
Econ
omic
Zon
e an
d C
ontin
enta
l She
lf (E
nvir
onm
enta
l Effe
cts)
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. A
men
d se
ctio
n 5.
6.3.
1 Po
licie
s, by
ad
ding
– “
(iv) W
here
ac
tiviti
es se
awar
d of
the
coas
tal m
arin
e ar
ea
requ
ire
cons
ent u
nder
th
e Ex
clus
ive
Econ
omic
Zo
ne a
nd C
ontin
enta
l Sh
elf (
Envi
ronm
enta
l
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
19
Act 2
012,
the
Cou
ncil
shal
l con
side
r any
thre
at
to th
e lif
e su
ppor
ting
capa
city
of t
he C
oast
al
Mar
ine
Area
.” O
r wor
ds
to th
at e
ffec
t.
Effe
cts)
Act
201
2, th
e C
ounc
il sh
all c
onsi
der
any
thre
at to
the
life
supp
ortin
g ca
paci
ty o
f th
e C
oast
al M
arin
e Ar
ea.”
M
inis
ter
and
Dep
artm
ent o
f Con
serv
atio
n (M
OC
)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns R
eque
sted
G
ener
al
Rep
lace
“sh
ould
” w
ith “
shal
l” o
r “do
” in
Pol
icie
s etc
. th
roug
hout
the
who
le
docu
men
t
R
ejec
t: C
ounc
il’s
expe
rienc
e ha
s not
ed th
at
coop
erat
ion
has b
een
dem
onst
rate
d to
be
mor
e ef
fect
ive
in th
e C
hath
ams
cont
ext,
than
a m
ore
coer
cive
app
roac
h. It
is
cons
ider
ed th
at th
e us
e of
“s
houl
d” b
ette
r ref
lect
s thi
s.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. I
t is a
ccep
ted
that
the
use
of “
shou
ld”
refle
cts t
he C
hath
ams
uniq
ue c
onte
xt a
nd g
ives
su
ffic
ient
dire
ctio
n.
3.2.
2 Pa
rt 3,
Pg.
14,
pr
ovid
e fo
r “in
clus
ion
of in
vasi
ve
mac
roph
ytes
” in
the
Issu
es se
ctio
n.
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
It is
ac
cept
ed th
at in
vasi
ve
mac
roph
ytes
cou
ld b
e an
is
sue
for t
he C
hath
ams,
but
the
sugg
este
d in
clus
ion
Acc
ept:
It is
acc
epte
d th
at
inva
sive
mac
roph
ytes
co
uld
be a
n is
sue
for t
he
Cha
tham
s. A
dd to
3.2
.2 a
fo
urth
Issu
e to
read
,
Acc
ept.
We
acce
pt is
ap
prop
riate
to in
clud
e th
is
as a
new
issu
e in
the
Sect
ions
3.2
, 3.4
and
3.5
. A
dd a
new
issu
e to
Sec
tion
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
20
wou
ld b
e be
tter e
xpre
ssed
w
ithin
3.6
“N
atur
al
Feat
ures
” 3.
6.2(
iii) t
o re
ad,
thre
ats t
o th
e na
tura
l en
viro
nmen
t of t
he Is
land
s fr
om in
vasi
ve m
acro
phyt
es.
thre
ats t
o th
e na
tura
l en
viro
nmen
t of t
he Is
land
s fr
om in
vasi
ve
mac
roph
ytes
. Als
o ad
d as
an
Issu
e in
Par
t 3.5
, "C
oast
al E
nviro
nmen
t" in
3.
5.2
and
in P
art 3
.4,
"Wat
er R
esou
rces
" in
3.4.
2.
3.2.
2, 3
.4.2
and
3.5
.2 to
re
ad –
“Th
reat
s to
the
natu
ral e
nvir
onm
ent o
f the
Is
land
s fro
m in
vasi
ve
mac
roph
ytes
”. A
lso
add
as
an Is
sue
in S
ectio
n 3.
5.2
and
Sect
ion
3.4.
2.
3.5
Coa
stal
E
nvir
onm
ent
Pg. 1
7-19
, inc
lude
m
easu
res t
o pr
even
t es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f ag
gres
sive
exo
tic
mac
roph
ytes
A
ccep
t: S
ectio
n 3.
5,
“Coa
stal
Env
ironm
ent”
is
larg
ely
a di
scus
sion
sect
ion
and
the
sugg
este
d m
easu
res
are
bette
r exp
ress
ed w
ithin
4.
2 W
ater
Res
ourc
es a
nd
4.3,
Coa
stal
Env
ironm
ent
Sect
ion
as a
n ad
ditio
nal
Obj
ectiv
e an
d Po
licy.
C
urre
ntly
Cou
ncil
does
not
ha
ve th
e kn
owle
dge
or
expe
rtise
to d
evel
op su
ch
mea
sure
s and
an
Obj
ectiv
e is
to b
e ad
ded
to 4
.2 a
nd 4
.3
to se
ek th
e ac
tive
invo
lvem
ent o
f DO
C a
nd
othe
r age
ncie
s in
deve
lopi
ng m
easu
res.
The
Obj
ectiv
e un
der 4
.2.1
an
d 4.
3.1
to re
ad, T
o de
velo
p m
easu
res i
n
Acc
ept:
With
the
addi
tion
that
the
Obj
ectiv
e un
der 4
.2.1
and
4.3
.1 to
re
ad, T
o de
velo
p m
easu
res
in c
oope
ratio
n w
ith a
ll ag
enci
es to
pre
vent
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of
aggr
essi
ve e
xotic
m
acro
phyt
es.
Acc
ept.
It is
acc
epte
d th
at
a m
ulti-
agen
cy a
ppro
ach
is
nece
ssar
y to
pre
vent
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of u
nwan
ted
exot
ic m
acro
phyt
es. A
dd
an O
bjec
tive
unde
r Se
ctio
ns 4
.2.1
and
4.3
.1 to
re
ad -
“To
deve
lop
mea
sure
s in
coop
erat
ion
with
all
agen
cies
to
prev
ent t
he e
stab
lishm
ent
of a
ggre
ssiv
e ex
otic
m
acro
phyt
es.”
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
21
coop
erat
ion
with
all
agen
cies
to p
reve
nt th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f agg
ress
ive
exot
ic m
acro
phyt
es.
3.5
Coa
stal
E
nvir
onm
ent
Add
stat
emen
t to
Coa
stal
Sec
tion
on
thre
ats f
rom
inva
sive
sp
ecie
s
A
ccep
t: In
add
ition
to th
e ne
w Is
sue
on in
vasi
ve
mac
roph
ytes
in 3
.5.2
, on
page
18
add
a pa
ragr
aph
afte
r par
a 7.
The
coa
stal
en
viro
nmen
t of t
he Is
land
s fa
ces t
hrea
ts fr
om
aggr
essi
ve e
xotic
m
acro
phyt
es.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t: In
add
ition
to th
e ne
w Is
sue
on in
vasi
ve
mac
roph
ytes
in 3
.5.2
, on
page
18,
add
a p
arag
raph
af
ter p
arag
raph
7. T
he
coas
tal e
nvir
onm
ent o
f the
Is
land
s fac
es th
reat
s fro
m
aggr
essi
ve e
xotic
m
acro
phyt
es.
Add
the
follo
win
g se
nten
ce
to se
ctio
n 4.
3.1
Rea
sons
–
“Cou
ncil
in c
oope
ratio
n w
ith o
ther
age
ncie
s is a
lso
com
mitt
ed to
taki
ng st
eps
to st
op th
e sp
read
of
pest
s”.
3.6
Nat
ural
Fe
atur
es
Iden
tify
and
list:
Embe
rger
ia,
Myo
sotid
iym
, Le
pidi
um re
kohu
nese
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
DO
C h
as
been
requ
este
d to
aid
the
Cou
ncil
in th
is, a
s it i
s cu
rren
tly o
utsi
de th
e C
ounc
ils a
rea
of
com
pete
nce.
If th
is
info
rmat
ion
is fo
rthco
min
g it
is su
gges
ted
that
it b
e
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n. It
is
sugg
este
d D
OC
is
requ
este
d to
pro
vide
the
requ
ired
info
rmat
ion
to
the
Com
mis
sion
ers w
ithin
a
spec
ified
tim
e. In
ad
ditio
n, th
e in
form
atio
n ca
n be
add
ed to
the
Part
ly A
ccep
t. T
here
was
no
t eno
ugh
info
rmat
ion
avai
labl
e to
incl
ude
sign
ifica
nt si
tes o
f in
dige
nous
veg
etat
ion
at
the
time
of th
e re
view
. A
co
llabo
rativ
e ap
proa
ch is
ne
ed to
iden
tify
sign
ifica
nt
natu
ral f
eatu
res.
Suc
h si
tes
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
22
adde
d to
the
CIR
MD
as a
Pl
an C
hang
e.
CIR
MD
as a
tech
nica
l co
rrec
tion.
ca
n be
add
ed to
the
CIR
MD
as a
pla
n ch
ange
. 4.
2.1.
2 In
clud
e a
Met
hod
to
impl
emen
t the
NPS
fo
r Fre
shw
ater
M
anag
emen
t
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
The
Cou
ncil
fully
acc
epts
the
nece
ssity
to
giv
e ef
fect
to N
atio
nal
Polic
y St
atem
ents
. H
owev
er, t
he C
ounc
il do
es
not p
osse
ss th
e re
sour
ces t
o gi
ve fu
ll ef
fect
to th
is N
PS
at th
is p
oint
and
to th
e ha
lt th
e pl
an p
roce
ss w
hile
a
prog
ram
me
of
impl
emen
tatio
n w
as
deve
lope
d w
ould
lead
to a
de
lay
in w
hich
the
requ
irem
ent t
o re
view
the
CIR
MD
wou
ld n
ot b
e m
et.
In a
dditi
on, t
he fr
eshw
ater
m
anag
emen
t iss
ues f
acin
g th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s are
of a
m
inor
nat
ure
and
a nu
mbe
r of
the
issu
es a
re a
lread
y de
alt w
ith in
the
Prop
osed
C
IRM
D.
Sect
ion
4.2,
Wat
er
Res
ourc
es a
lread
y co
ntai
ns
thos
e in
terim
Pol
icie
s re
quire
d to
be
inse
rted
into
th
e C
IRM
D b
y th
e N
PS
(New
Pol
icy
4.2.
1.1(
iv))
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n an
d ac
cord
ingl
y it
is su
gges
ted
a “p
roce
ss”
Obj
ectiv
e is
in
clud
ed in
4.2
Wat
er
Res
ourc
es, t
o si
gnal
the
Cou
ncils
inte
ntio
n to
de
velo
p an
im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ram
me
as a
ppro
pria
te
to th
e Is
land
s.
DO
C c
ritic
ised
the
sam
ple
prog
ram
me
atta
ched
to
the
Sect
ion
42A
repo
rt bu
t th
is d
oes n
ot fo
rm p
art o
f th
e pl
an a
nd m
y un
ders
tand
ing
is th
at it
is
not o
pen
to su
bmis
sion
. In
any
eve
nt th
e tim
efra
mes
are
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith N
PS o
n Fr
eshw
ater
Man
agem
ent.
Part
ly A
ccep
t. It
is
agre
ed th
at th
e co
nsid
erat
ion
of fr
eshw
ater
m
anag
emen
t iss
ues a
re n
ot
“of m
inor
nat
ure”
. H
owev
er, t
here
is n
o ev
iden
ce o
f any
“m
ajor
” th
reat
s to
the
Isla
nds
fres
hwat
er re
sour
ces.
We
acce
pt th
e pr
ovis
ions
of t
he
CIR
MD
incl
ude
the
inte
rim p
olic
ies w
hich
are
re
quire
d to
be
inse
rted
unde
r the
NPS
on
Fres
hwat
er M
anag
emen
t.
Giv
en th
e cu
rren
t lev
el o
f ris
k an
d th
e lim
ited
reso
urce
s of t
he C
ounc
il, it
is
app
ropr
iate
to in
clud
e a
new
obj
ectiv
e to
sect
ion
4.2.
1 O
bjec
tive
– W
ater
Q
uant
ity to
read
“To
de
velo
p a
prog
ram
me,
ap
prop
riat
e to
the
issu
es
faci
ng th
e C
hath
am
Isla
nds,
that
impl
emen
ts
the
Nat
iona
l Pol
icy
on
Fres
hwat
er M
anag
emen
t.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
23
[Not
e: th
is is
cur
rent
ly
show
n in
err
or a
s 4.
2.1.
1(iii
)] a
nd P
olic
y 4.
2.3.
1(vi
). A
“pr
oces
s” O
bjec
tive
is to
be
incl
uded
in 4
.2 W
ater
R
esou
rces
, to
sign
al th
e C
ounc
ils in
tent
ion
to
deve
lop
an im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ram
me
as a
ppro
pria
te
to th
e Is
land
s. Th
e su
gges
ted
wor
ding
of t
his
Obj
ectiv
e is
: To
deve
lop
a pr
ogra
mm
e, a
ppro
pria
te to
th
e is
sues
faci
ng th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s, to
im
plem
ent t
he N
atio
nal
Polic
y on
Fre
shw
ater
M
anag
emen
t. Th
is
prog
ram
me
will
be
impl
emen
ted
in a
stag
ed
man
ner a
nd P
olic
ies a
nd
Met
hods
will
be
incl
uded
th
roug
h ch
ange
s to
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent D
ocum
ent.
Or
wor
ds to
that
eff
ect.
A
poss
ible
pro
gram
me
is
incl
uded
in A
ppen
dix
1 to
th
is re
port.
This
pro
gram
me
will
be
impl
emen
ted
in a
stag
ed
man
ner a
nd P
olic
ies a
nd
Met
hods
will
be
incl
uded
th
roug
h pl
an c
hang
es to
th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s Re
sour
ce M
anag
emen
t Ac
t”.
In a
dditi
on, t
he
follo
win
g ne
w se
nten
ce
shou
ld b
e ad
ded
to th
e en
d of
the
para
grap
h un
der
Rea
sons
– “
Cou
ncil
is a
lso
requ
ired
to g
ive
effe
ct to
th
e N
PS o
n Fr
eshw
ater
an
d w
ill p
rogr
essi
vely
ad
dres
s thi
s mat
ter”
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
24
In a
dditi
on, i
n th
e “R
easo
ns”
unde
r the
new
O
bjec
tive,
add
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
NPS
.
4.2.
1.2
Incl
ude
a M
etho
d to
im
plem
ent t
he N
PS
for F
resh
wat
er
Man
agem
ent
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
As a
bove
Se
e 4.
2.1.
2 ab
ove
for
appr
oach
in re
spec
t of
NPS
Fre
shw
ater
Part
ly A
ccep
t. T
he
addi
tion
of a
new
obj
ectiv
e to
sect
ion
4.2.
1 O
bjec
tive
– W
ater
Qua
ntity
add
ress
es
the
stag
ed a
nd p
rogr
essi
ve
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
NPS
fo
r Fre
shw
ater
M
anag
emen
t. 4.
2.1.
2 In
clud
e M
etho
ds to
im
plem
ent t
he N
PS
for F
resh
wat
er
Man
agem
ent f
or fl
ow
setti
ng a
nd w
ater
al
loca
tion
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
As a
bove
Se
e 4.
2.1.
2 ab
ove
for
appr
oach
in re
spec
t of
NPS
Fre
shw
ater
Part
ly A
ccep
t. T
he
addi
tion
of a
new
obj
ectiv
e to
sect
ion
4.2.
1 O
bjec
tive
– W
ater
Qua
ntity
add
ress
es
the
stag
ed a
nd p
rogr
essi
ve
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
NPS
fo
r Fre
shw
ater
M
anag
emen
t. W
ater
Q
ualit
y 4.
2.3
4.2.
3 In
clud
e M
etho
ds to
im
plem
ent t
he N
PS
for F
resh
wat
er
Man
agem
ent t
o ac
hiev
e
Obj
ectiv
e 4.
2.3
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
As a
bove
Se
e 4.
2.1.
2 ab
ove
for
appr
oach
in re
spec
t of
NPS
Fre
shw
ater
Part
ly A
ccep
t. T
he
addi
tion
of a
new
obj
ectiv
e to
sect
ion
4.2.
1 O
bjec
tive
– W
ater
Qua
ntity
add
ress
es
the
stag
ed a
nd p
rogr
essi
ve
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
NPS
fo
r Fre
shw
ater
M
anag
emen
t.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
25
4.2.
3.1
4.2.
3.1
Incl
ude
prov
isio
ns to
pro
tect
bi
odiv
ersi
ty v
alue
s
R
ejec
t: A
lthou
gh
biod
iver
sity
val
ues a
re n
ot
spec
ifica
lly m
entio
ned,
it is
co
nsid
ered
that
pro
tect
ion
of su
ch v
alue
s are
inhe
rent
in
Pol
icy
4.2.
3.1,
e.g
. 4.
2.3.
1(i)
and
(vi)
Acc
ept:
It is
con
side
red
appr
opria
te to
incl
ude
biod
iver
sity
val
ues.
Acc
ept.
It is
app
ropr
iate
to
incl
ude
refe
renc
e to
bi
odiv
ersi
ty v
alue
s. A
dd –
“b
iodi
vers
ity v
alue
s” to
se
ctio
n 4.
2.3.
1 Po
licie
s.
Te
Wha
nga
4.2.
4.1
4.2.
4 Te
Wha
nga:
Pr
ovis
ions
to p
rote
ct
Te W
hang
a, in
clud
ing
inte
grat
ed c
atch
men
t m
anag
emen
t
R
ejec
t: It
is c
onsi
dere
d th
at
Polic
y 4.
2.3.
1 (e
.g.
4.2.
4.1(
ii)) c
onta
ins
suff
icie
nt d
etai
l to
prot
ect
Te W
hang
a
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. W
e ag
ree
that
Po
licy
4.2.
3.1
cont
ains
su
ffic
ient
det
ail t
o pr
otec
t Te
Wha
nga.
4.
4.1.
1 4.
4.1.
1: d
elet
e “s
houl
d” fr
om P
olic
y
Rej
ect:
Cou
ncil’
s ex
perie
nce
has n
oted
that
co
oper
atio
n ha
s bee
n de
mon
stra
ted
to b
e m
ore
effe
ctiv
e in
the
Cha
tham
s co
ntex
t, th
an a
mor
e co
erci
ve a
ppro
ach.
It is
co
nsid
ered
that
the
use
of
“sho
uld”
bet
ter r
efle
cts t
his
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n R
ejec
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d. W
e ag
ree
with
th
e R
epor
ting
Off
icer
that
us
e of
“sh
ould
” is
ap
prop
riate
giv
en th
e C
ounc
il’s c
oerc
ive
appr
oach
.
Gen
eral
G
ive
effe
ct to
the
NZC
PS: p
rese
rvat
ion
of
natu
ral c
hara
cter
, ou
tsta
ndin
g na
tura
l la
ndsc
apes
, ind
igen
ous
biod
iver
sity
, dis
char
ges,
wat
er q
ualit
y,
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
The
Cou
ncil
fully
acc
epts
the
nece
ssity
to
giv
e ef
fect
to N
atio
nal
Polic
y St
atem
ents
. H
owev
er, t
he C
ounc
il do
es
not p
osse
ss th
e re
sour
ces t
o gi
ve fu
ll ef
fect
to th
is
NZC
PS a
t thi
s poi
nt a
nd th
e
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n an
d ac
cord
ingl
y it
is su
gges
ted
that
a “
proc
ess”
Obj
ectiv
e be
incl
uded
in 4
.3 C
oast
al
Envi
ronm
ent,
to si
gnal
the
Cou
ncils
inte
ntio
n to
de
velo
p an
Partl
y A
ccep
t. T
he D
OC
se
eks a
tim
efra
me
for
impl
emen
tatio
n to
mea
sure
pr
ogre
ss a
gain
st.
How
ever
, the
Cou
ncil
need
s suf
ficie
nt ti
me
and
reso
urce
s to
give
full
effe
ct
to th
e pr
ovis
ions
of t
he
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
26
prec
autio
nary
app
roac
h,
bios
ecur
ity
halt
the
plan
pro
cess
whi
le a
pr
ogra
mm
e of
im
plem
enta
tion
was
de
velo
ped
wou
ld le
ad to
a
dela
y in
whi
ch th
e re
quire
men
t to
revi
ew th
e C
IRM
D w
ould
not
be
met
. In
add
ition
, the
coa
stal
m
anag
emen
t iss
ues f
acin
g th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s are
of a
m
inor
nat
ure
and
a nu
mbe
r of
the
issu
es a
re a
lread
y de
alt w
ith in
the
Prop
osed
C
IRM
D.
It is
sugg
este
d th
at a
“p
roce
ss”
Obj
ectiv
e be
in
clud
ed in
4.3
Coa
stal
En
viro
nmen
t, to
sign
al th
e C
ounc
ils in
tent
ion
to
deve
lop
an im
plem
enta
tion
prog
ram
me
as a
ppro
pria
te
to th
e Is
land
s. Th
e su
gges
ted
wor
ding
of t
his
Obj
ectiv
e is
: To
deve
lop
a pr
ogra
mm
e, a
ppro
pria
te to
th
e is
sues
faci
ng th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s, to
im
plem
ent t
he N
ew Z
eala
nd
Coa
stal
Pol
icy
Stat
emen
t. Th
is p
rogr
amm
e w
ill b
e
impl
emen
tatio
n pr
ogra
mm
e as
app
ropr
iate
to
the
Isla
nds.
NZC
PS.
It is
acc
epte
d th
at
incl
udin
g a
‘pro
cess
’ ob
ject
ive
wou
ld g
ive
certa
inty
that
the
prov
isio
ns w
ill b
e im
plem
ente
d pr
ogre
ssiv
ely
in a
stag
ed m
anne
r. A
dd
the
follo
win
g ne
w
obje
ctiv
e to
sect
ion
4.3
– “T
o de
velo
p a
prog
ram
me,
ap
prop
riat
e to
the
issu
es
faci
ng th
e C
hath
am
Isla
nds,
to im
plem
ent t
he
New
Zea
land
Coa
stal
Po
licy
Stat
emen
t. Th
is
prog
ram
me
will
be
impl
emen
ted
in a
stag
ed
man
ner a
nd P
olic
ies a
nd
Met
hods
will
be
incl
uded
th
roug
h ch
ange
s to
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent D
ocum
ent.”
A
dd th
e fo
llow
ing
sent
ence
to
the
sect
ion
4.3
Rea
sons
–
“Cou
ncil
is a
lso
requ
ired
to
giv
e ef
fect
to th
e N
ZCPS
an
d w
ill p
rogr
essi
vely
ad
dres
s thi
s mat
ter”
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
27
impl
emen
ted
in a
stag
ed
man
ner a
nd P
olic
ies a
nd
Met
hods
will
be
incl
uded
th
roug
h ch
ange
s to
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds R
esou
rce
Man
agem
ent D
ocum
ent.
In
add
ition
, add
into
the
“Rea
sons
” un
der t
his n
ew
Obj
ectiv
e, a
dd th
e re
quire
men
t to
give
eff
ect t
o th
e N
ZCPS
. Pa
rt 7
Pa
rt 7
appe
ndic
es;
App
1: A
pply
cor
rect
sc
ient
ific
nam
es
A
ccep
t: D
OC
has
bee
n re
ques
ted
to a
id th
e C
ounc
il in
this
, as i
t is c
urre
ntly
ou
tsid
e th
e C
ounc
il’s a
rea
of c
ompe
tenc
e. If
this
hel
p is
forth
com
ing,
it is
su
gges
ted
that
it b
e ad
ded
to
the
CIR
MD
as t
echn
ical
am
endm
ents
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n an
d it
is
sugg
este
d D
OC
is
requ
este
d to
pro
vide
the
requ
ired
info
rmat
ion
to
the
Com
mis
sion
ers w
ithin
a
spec
ified
tim
e. In
ad
ditio
n, th
e in
form
atio
n ca
n be
add
ed to
the
CIR
MD
as a
tech
nica
l co
rrec
tion.
Acc
ept.
DO
C h
ave
been
gi
ven
the
oppo
rtuni
ty to
pr
ovid
e su
gges
ted
incl
usio
ns sc
ient
ific
nam
es
for s
peci
es li
sted
in th
e C
IRM
D.
Thes
e ha
ve b
een
incl
uded
thro
ugho
ut th
e do
cum
ent w
here
ap
prop
riate
.
Part
7
Part
7 ap
pend
ices
; A
reas
of S
igni
fican
t N
atur
al V
alue
s:
Prov
ide
for p
rote
ctio
n of
the
liste
d ha
bita
t ty
pes (
8 pr
ovid
ed)
A
ccep
t: P
rovi
sion
for
prot
ectio
n w
ould
be
bette
r in
clud
ed in
4.5
.1.1
. It i
s su
gges
ted
that
cla
use
(f) o
f th
is P
olic
y be
del
eted
and
re
plac
ed w
ith a
new
Pol
icy
4.5.
1.1(
ii) b
e ad
ded
to re
ad:
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. A
ccep
t Rep
ortin
g O
ffic
er’s
reco
mm
enda
tion.
D
elet
e se
ctio
n 4.
5.1.
1 Po
licie
s (i)(
f).
Add
the
follo
win
g ne
w se
ctio
n 4.
5.1.
1 “(
ii) -
To p
rote
ct
the
iden
tifie
d
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
28
To p
rote
ct th
e id
entif
ied
char
acte
rist
ics o
f the
ou
tsta
ndin
g la
ndsc
ape
or
natu
ral f
eatu
re fr
om th
e ad
vers
e ef
fect
s of u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent.
char
acte
rist
ics o
f the
ou
tsta
ndin
g la
ndsc
apes
or
natu
ral f
eatu
res f
rom
ad
vers
e ef
fect
s of u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent.”
M
inor
tech
nica
l co
rrec
tions
: a n
umbe
r of
min
or te
chni
cal
corr
ectio
ns a
re su
bmitt
ed
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
Cha
nges
mad
e as
ap
prop
riate
thro
ugho
ut th
e do
cum
ent.
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
Pou
here
Tao
nga
(HN
Z)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns R
eque
sted
A
ppen
dix
3 •
App
endi
x 3
– si
x ad
ditio
nal p
lace
s to
be a
dded
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
On
the
advi
ce o
f HN
Z an
d up
on
agre
emen
t with
the
land
owne
r, ad
d 6
addi
tiona
l pl
aces
to A
ppen
dix
3. A
s set
ou
t in
the
Rea
sons
and
Ex
plan
atio
n to
4.4
.1.2
in th
e C
IRM
D C
ounc
il ha
s ge
nera
lly re
lied
on a
vo
lunt
ary
appr
oach
or
reco
gnis
ed li
sts i
n id
entif
ying
item
s/si
tes.
*
See
Repo
rt fo
r ful
l tex
t.
Part
ly A
ccep
t: O
n th
e ad
vice
of H
NZ
at th
e he
arin
g, th
e pl
aces
shou
ld
not b
e ad
ded
to th
e C
IRM
D S
ched
ule
at th
is
time
as th
e ag
reem
ent o
f th
e la
ndow
ners
has
not
be
en se
cure
d in
rela
tion
to
the
orig
inal
ly re
ques
ted
six
addi
tiona
l pla
ces.
Part
ly A
ccep
t. Th
e pa
rties
ag
reed
at t
he h
earin
g th
at
addi
tiona
l pla
ces s
houl
d on
ly b
e ad
ded
with
the
agre
emen
t of l
ando
wne
rs.
No
chan
ge re
quire
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
29
Gen
eral
•
Rel
ax o
pera
tive
rule
s on
inte
rnal
alte
ratio
ns
A
ccep
t: C
over
ed in
det
aile
d re
spon
se
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
s re
quire
d.
•
HN
Z ha
ppy
to
prov
ide
herit
age
advi
ce
A
ccep
t: C
ounc
il is
hap
py to
ac
cept
this
adv
ice
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
s re
quire
d.
•
HN
Z co
-ope
ratio
n to
w
ork
on in
vent
ory
of
cultu
ral s
ites
A
ccep
t: C
ounc
il is
hap
py to
ac
cept
that
coo
pera
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
s re
quire
d.
•
Firs
t pag
e –
add
to
para
1 (i
v) “
…
Her
itage
New
Ze
alan
d ar
chae
olog
ical
au
thor
ity e
tc”
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
chan
ge
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n Fi
rst p
age
– ad
d to
par
a 1
(iv) “
… H
erita
ge N
ew
Zeal
and
arch
aeol
ogic
al
auth
ority
etc
.”
Acc
ept.
Mak
e ad
ditio
n as
re
com
men
ded
by th
e R
epor
ting
Off
icer
.
Her
itage
It
ems
• Pa
rt 3,
3.7
: ado
pt k
ey
term
“hi
stor
ic
herit
age”
from
RM
A
in 3
.7 a
nd 4
.6
A
ccep
t: A
dopt
the
term
, “h
isto
ric h
erita
ge”
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Mak
e ad
ditio
ns
thro
ugho
ut th
e do
cum
ent,
as re
com
men
ded
by th
e R
epor
ting
Off
icer
. G
ener
al
• Pr
ovid
e gu
idan
ce
with
in C
IRM
D o
n in
form
atio
n to
be
prov
ided
with
ap
plic
atio
ns
Pa
rtly
Acc
ept:
It is
co
nsid
ered
that
such
gu
idan
ce c
ould
bes
t be
prov
ided
out
side
the
stat
utor
y do
cum
ent s
o th
at it
ca
n be
am
ende
d w
ithou
t fo
rmal
ity. C
onsi
der
prov
idin
g a
guid
ance
leaf
let,
or si
mila
r.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Part
ly A
ccep
t. W
e ag
ree
with
the
Rep
ortin
g O
ffic
er
that
such
gui
danc
e is
bes
t pr
ovid
ed o
utsi
de th
e st
atut
ory
docu
men
t so
that
it
can
be a
men
ded
with
out
form
ality
. The
Cou
ncil
shou
ld c
onsi
der p
rovi
ding
a
guid
ance
leaf
let,
or si
mila
r w
ith g
uida
nce
from
sect
ion
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
30
88 a
nd S
ched
ule
4 of
the
RM
A.
Her
itage
It
ems
• 1.
2.1
(p4,
Her
itage
si
tes)
: am
end
1.2.
1 to
re
ad, “
Appe
ndix
3
prov
ides
a sc
hedu
le
of h
erita
ge b
uild
ings
an
d si
tes t
o w
hich
sp
ecifi
c ru
les o
f the
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t do
cum
ent a
pply
.”
And
del
ete
curr
ent
text
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n 1.
2.1
(p4,
Her
itage
site
s):
amen
d 1.
2.1
to re
ad,
“App
endi
x 3
prov
ides
a
sche
dule
of h
erita
ge
build
ings
and
site
s to
whi
ch sp
ecifi
c ru
les o
f the
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t do
cum
ent a
pply
.” A
nd
dele
te c
urre
nt te
xt
Acc
ept.
We
agre
e w
ith th
e R
epor
ting
Off
icer
’s
reco
mm
enda
tion
to a
men
d se
ctio
n 1.
2.1
to re
ad -
“App
endi
x 3
prov
ides
a
sche
dule
of h
erita
ge
build
ings
and
site
s to
whi
ch sp
ecifi
c ru
les o
f the
re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t do
cum
ent a
pply
.” a
nd
dele
te th
e or
igin
al te
xt.
1.3
• 1
.3: R
etai
n th
ese
prov
isio
ns
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Invo
lvem
ent o
f Iw
i 2.2
•
2.2:
Ret
ain
but c
heck
M
orio
ri te
rmin
olog
y
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Sust
aina
ble
Man
agem
ent
3.2
• 3
.2 R
etai
n
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Iwi
Pers
pect
ive
3.3
• 3.
3 (p
15) 3
.3.2
(i)
Am
end
issu
e 3.
3.2(
i) to
read
: “D
amag
e to
kn
own
and
unre
cord
ed w
ahi t
apu
site
s thr
ough
out t
he
isla
nds i
nclu
ding
in
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion,
but
reta
in th
e ex
ampl
es to
read
: “D
amag
e to
kno
wn
and
unre
cord
ed
wah
i tap
u si
tes t
hrou
ghou
t th
e is
land
s, in
clud
ing
in
sand
dun
es, f
ores
t and
kop
i
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
We
agre
e w
ith th
e R
epor
ting
Off
icer
’s
reco
mm
enda
tion
to a
men
d se
ctio
n 3.
3.2(
i) to
read
-“D
amag
e to
kno
wn
and
unre
cord
ed w
ahi t
apu
site
s th
roug
hout
the
isla
nds,
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
31
sand
dun
es, f
ores
t and
ko
pi g
rove
s, fr
om
activ
ities
such
as
stoc
k gr
azin
g in
un
fenc
ed a
reas
.”
grov
es, f
rom
act
iviti
es su
ch
as st
ock
graz
ing
in u
nfen
ced
area
s.”
incl
udin
g in
sand
dun
es,
fore
st a
nd k
opi g
rove
s, fr
om a
ctiv
ities
such
as
stoc
k gr
azin
g in
unf
ence
d ar
eas.”
Is
sues
3.4
.2
• 3
.4.2
Issu
e (ii
) Ret
ain
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Coa
stal
E
nvir
onm
ent
: Iss
ue
3.5.
2
• 3
.5.2
Issu
e (ii
) Ret
ain
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Her
itage
It
ems 3
.7
• 3.
7 H
erita
ge It
ems:
Add
or
am
end:
3.7
His
tori
c H
erita
ge It
ems1
6 3.
7.1
Bac
kgro
und
“His
tori
c H
erita
ge
Item
s” a
dd a
fter
seco
nd se
nten
ce, “
The
prot
ectio
n of
his
tori
c he
rita
ge fr
om
inap
prop
riat
e su
bdiv
isio
n, u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent i
s a m
atte
r of
nat
iona
l im
port
ance
un
der S
ectio
n 6(
f) of
th
e Ac
t req
uire
s tha
t pa
rticu
lar r
egar
d is
to
be h
ad to
thei
r
R
ejec
t: It
is c
onsi
dere
d th
at
this
wor
ding
exp
ress
es th
e st
ance
take
n by
HN
Z an
d is
ou
t-of-
plac
e in
the
CIR
MD
.
Part
ly A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
chan
ges,
exce
pt
for:
Sinc
e th
e la
st C
IRM
D
beca
me
oper
ativ
e, a
C
hath
am Is
land
hou
se o
n th
e N
ew Z
eala
nd H
erita
ge
List
that
was
not
pro
tect
ed
by th
e do
cum
ent h
as b
een
dem
olis
hed
and
a fu
rthe
r ho
use
on P
itt Is
land
has
be
en lo
st th
roug
h fir
e.
Also
, ear
thw
orks
as
soci
ated
with
new
in
fras
truc
ture
hav
e di
stur
bed
arch
aeol
ogic
al
site
s. Al
so, e
arth
wor
ks
Part
ly A
ccep
t. A
men
d “H
erita
ge It
ems”
to
“His
tori
c H
erita
ge”.
D
elet
e th
e se
cond
sent
ence
in
sect
ion
3.7.
1 an
d in
sert
“The
pro
tect
ion
of h
isto
ric
heri
tage
from
in
appr
opri
ate
subd
ivis
ion,
us
e an
d de
velo
pmen
t is a
m
atte
r of n
atio
nal
impo
rtan
ce u
nder
Sec
tion
6(f)
of th
e Ac
t and
Cou
ncil
is re
quir
ed to
reco
gnis
e an
d pr
ovid
e fo
r it.
Add
-
“All
of th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s ar
e ri
ch in
arc
haeo
logy
an
d m
Man
y iw
i site
s are
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
32
reco
gniti
on a
nd
prot
ectio
n an
d C
ounc
il is
requ
ired
to re
cogn
ize
and
prov
ide
for i
t.”
“Exa
mpl
es o
f his
tori
c he
ritag
e ite
ms
and
add
third
sent
ence
, “Al
l of
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
are
rich
in a
rcha
eolo
gy
and
m M
any
iwi s
ites
are
conc
entra
ted
on th
e co
ast,
incl
udin
g m
any
urup
a in
the
sand
du
nes.”
Th
e H
erita
ge N
ew
Zeal
and
Pouh
ere
Taon
ga H
isto
ric P
lace
s A
ct 1
993
2014
(H
NZP
TA) r
equi
res
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tru
st to
es
tabl
ish
and
mai
ntai
n a
regi
ster
list
of h
isto
ric
plac
es, h
isto
ric a
reas
, w
ahi t
apu,
wah
i tup
una
and
wah
i tap
u ar
eas.
This
list
is c
alle
d th
e N
ew Z
eala
nd H
erita
ge
List
/Rar
angi
Kor
ero
and
it in
clud
es e
ight
asso
ciat
ed w
ith n
ew
infr
astr
uctu
re h
ave
dist
urbe
d ar
chae
olog
ical
si
tes.
conc
entra
ted
on th
e co
ast,
incl
udin
g m
any
urup
a in
th
e sa
nd d
unes
.” D
elet
e th
ird p
arag
raph
and
inse
rt ne
par
agra
ph to
read
- Th
e H
erita
ge N
ew Z
eala
nd
Pouh
ere
Taon
ga H
isto
ric
Plac
es A
ct 1
993
2014
(H
NZP
TA) r
equi
res
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
H
isto
ric
Plac
es T
rust
to
esta
blis
h an
d m
aint
ain
a re
gist
er li
st o
f his
toric
pl
aces
, his
tori
c ar
eas,
wah
i ta
pu, w
ahi t
upun
a an
d w
ahi t
apu
area
s. Th
is li
st is
ca
lled
the
New
Zea
land
H
erita
ge L
ist/R
aran
gi
Kor
ero
and
it in
clud
es
eigh
t bui
ldin
gs a
nd o
ne
stat
ue o
n C
hath
am Is
land
an
d on
e bu
ildin
g on
Pit
Isla
nd. O
ne o
f the
pur
pose
s of
the
List
is to
pro
vide
in
form
atio
n ab
out h
isto
ric
heri
tage
for t
he p
urpo
se o
f th
e Re
sour
ce M
anag
emen
t Ac
t 199
1. In
clus
ion
on th
e Li
st W
hile
thes
e bu
ildin
gs
are
regi
ster
ed u
nder
the
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
33
build
ings
and
one
st
atue
on
Cha
tham
Is
land
and
one
bui
ldin
g on
Pit
Isla
nd. O
ne o
f th
e pu
rpos
es o
f the
Lis
t is
to p
rovi
de
info
rmat
ion
abou
t hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge fo
r the
pu
rpos
e of
the
Reso
urce
Man
agem
ent
Act 1
991.
Incl
usio
n on
th
e Li
st W
hile
thes
e bu
ildin
gs a
re re
gist
ered
un
der t
he A
ct, t
his d
oes
not o
f its
elf p
rote
ct
agai
nst p
reve
nt
dem
oliti
on o
r dam
age.
H
owev
er, t
he re
sour
ce
man
agem
ent d
ocum
ent
prov
ides
an
oppo
rtun
ity
to p
rote
ct th
ese
plac
es
by in
clud
ing
them
on
a he
rita
ge sc
hedu
le a
nd
esta
blis
hing
ap
prop
riat
e ru
les t
o pr
otec
t his
tori
c he
rita
ge it
ems f
rom
in
appr
opri
ate
subd
ivis
ion
use
and
deve
lopm
ent.”
Act,
this
doe
s not
of i
tsel
f pr
otec
t aga
inst
pre
vent
de
mol
ition
or d
amag
e.
How
ever
, the
reso
urce
m
anag
emen
t doc
umen
t pr
ovid
es a
n op
port
unity
to
prot
ect t
hese
pla
ces b
y in
clud
ing
them
on
a he
rita
ge sc
hedu
le a
nd
esta
blis
hing
app
ropr
iate
ru
les t
o pr
otec
t his
tori
c he
rita
ge it
ems f
rom
in
appr
opri
ate
subd
ivis
ion
use
and
deve
lopm
ent.”
D
elet
e “O
ther
than
the
build
ings
ther
e ar
e no
oth
er
item
s on
the
Trus
t R
egis
ter.”
and
add
–
“Arc
haeo
logi
cal s
ites a
re
defin
ed in
the
Her
itage
N
ew Z
eala
nd P
ouhe
re
Taon
ga A
ct 2
014
as:
Any
plac
e in
New
Zea
land
, in
clud
ing
any
build
ing
or
stru
ctur
e (o
r par
t of a
bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e) th
at-
• W
as a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
hum
an a
ctiv
ity th
at
occu
rred
bef
ore
1900
or i
s
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
34
Oth
er th
an th
e bu
ildin
gs th
ere
are
no
othe
r ite
ms o
n th
e Tr
ust
Reg
iste
r Ar
chae
olog
ical
site
s ar
e de
fined
in th
e H
erita
ge N
ew Z
eala
nd
Pouh
ere
Taon
ga A
ct
2014
as:
An
y pl
ace
in N
ew
Zeal
and,
incl
udin
g an
y bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e (o
r pa
rt o
f a b
uild
ing
or
stru
ctur
e) th
at-
• W
as a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
hum
an a
ctiv
ity th
at
occu
rred
bef
ore
1900
or
is th
e si
te o
f the
w
reck
of a
ny v
esse
l w
here
that
wre
ck
occu
rred
bef
ore
1900
; an
d •
Prov
ides
or m
ay
prov
ide,
thro
ugh
inve
stig
atio
n by
ar
chae
olog
ical
m
etho
ds, e
vide
nce
rela
ting
to th
e hi
stor
y of
New
Zea
land
.”
the
site
of t
he w
reck
of a
ny
vess
el w
here
that
wre
ck
occu
rred
bef
ore
1900
; and
•
Prov
ides
or m
ay
prov
ide,
thro
ugh
inve
stig
atio
n by
ar
chae
olog
ical
met
hods
, ev
iden
ce re
latin
g to
the
hist
ory
of N
ew Z
eala
nd.”
A
men
d th
e fif
th p
arag
raph
to
read
- Th
e m
odifi
catio
n or
des
truc
tion
of tT
hese
si
tes a
nd o
ther
unr
ecor
ded
site
s tha
t mee
t the
de
finiti
on o
f an
arch
aeol
ogic
al si
te u
nder
th
e H
isto
ric P
lace
s Act
19
93 a
re c
over
ed b
y th
at
Act
, whi
ch r
equi
res t
he
obta
inin
g of
an
auth
ority
th
at a
n au
thor
ity is
requ
ired
from
Her
itage
the
New
Ze
alan
d. H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tr
ust t
o m
odify
, dis
turb
or
dest
roy
a si
te.
Ther
e ar
e al
so a
num
ber o
f oth
er si
tes
whi
ch a
re n
ot re
cord
ed
unde
r the
NZA
A S
chem
e.
The
loca
tion
of th
ese
site
s
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
35
“The
New
Zea
land
A
rcha
eolo
gica
l A
ssoc
iatio
n (N
ZAA
) Site
R
ecor
ding
Sch
eme
has
reco
rded
ove
r 700
ar
chae
olog
ical
site
s on
the
Cha
tham
s. Th
e m
odifi
catio
n or
de
stru
ctio
n of
t Th
ese
site
s and
oth
er
unre
cord
ed si
tes t
hat
mee
t the
def
initi
on o
f an
arch
aeol
ogic
al si
te u
nder
th
e H
isto
ric P
lace
s Act
19
93 a
re c
over
ed b
y th
at
Act
requ
ires t
he
obta
inin
g of
that
an
auth
ority
is re
quire
d fr
om
the
Her
itage
New
Ze
alan
d H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tr
ust t
o m
odify
, dis
turb
or
des
troy
a si
te. T
here
ar
e al
so a
num
ber o
f ot
her s
ites w
hich
are
not
re
cord
ed u
nder
the
NZA
A S
chem
e. T
he
loca
tion
of th
ese
site
s is
only
kno
wn
to th
e Iw
i w
ho m
aint
ain
a si
lent
file
an
d w
ho d
o no
t wis
h to
is o
nly
know
n to
the
imi/i
wi w
ho m
aint
ain
a si
lent
file
and
who
do
not
wis
h to
mak
e th
e si
tes
publ
ic.
Alth
ough
tThe
se
site
s are
unr
ecor
ded,
they
ar
e al
so c
over
ed b
y th
e pr
ovis
ions
of t
he
HN
ZPTA
.isto
ric P
lace
s Act
19
93.
Am
end
the
sixt
h pa
ragr
aph
to re
ad -
Site
s of
hist
oric
her
itage
ass
ists
to
pres
erve
the
iden
tity
of th
e is
land
s for
futu
re
gene
ratio
ns si
gnifi
canc
e ha
ve b
een
lost
or d
estro
yed
in th
e pa
st o
n th
e C
hath
ams
by d
evel
opm
ent o
r lan
d us
e an
d su
ch a
ctiv
ities
as
foss
icki
ng.
For e
xam
ple
rem
oval
of v
eget
atio
n ha
s le
d to
the
expo
sure
and
su
bseq
uent
loss
of t
he
dend
rogl
yphs
. R
eten
tion
of
such
item
s ass
ists
to
pres
erve
the
iden
tity
of th
e is
land
s for
futu
re
gene
ratio
ns.
His
tori
c he
rita
ge is
als
o of
inte
rest
to
vis
itors
to th
e C
hath
am
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
36
mak
e th
e si
tes p
ublic
. A
lthou
gh T
thes
e si
tes a
re
unre
cord
ed, t
hey
are
also
co
vere
d by
the
prov
isio
ns
of th
e H
NZP
TA H
isto
ric
Plac
es A
ct 1
993.
” Si
tes o
f his
toric
si
gnifi
canc
e ha
ve b
een
lost
or d
estro
yed
in th
e pa
st o
n th
e C
hath
ams b
y de
velo
pmen
t or l
and
use
and
such
act
iviti
es a
s fo
ssic
king
. Fo
r exa
mpl
e re
mov
al o
f veg
etat
ion
has l
ed to
the
expo
sure
an
d su
bseq
uent
loss
of
the
dend
rogl
yphy
s. S
ince
th
e la
st C
IRM
D b
ecam
e op
erat
ive,
a C
hath
am
Isla
nd h
ouse
on
the
New
Ze
alan
d H
erita
ge L
ist
that
was
not
pro
tect
ed b
y th
e do
cum
ent h
as b
een
dem
olis
hed
and
a fu
rthe
r ho
use
on P
itt Is
land
has
be
en lo
st th
roug
h fir
e.
Isla
nds.
How
ever
, it i
s im
port
ant t
hat p
hysi
cal
adap
tatio
ns a
re p
rovi
ded
for t
o en
able
the
heri
tage
bu
ildin
gs to
serv
e a
usef
ul
purp
ose,
esp
ecia
lly th
ose
used
for r
esid
entia
l pu
rpos
es.1 a
nd a
re o
f in
tere
st to
vis
itors
.
1 H
NZ
16
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
37
Also
, ear
thw
orks
as
soci
ated
with
new
in
fras
truc
ture
hav
e di
stur
bed
arch
aeol
ogic
al
site
s. Al
so, e
arth
wor
ks
asso
ciat
ed w
ith n
ew
infr
astr
uctu
re h
ave
dist
urbe
d ar
chae
olog
ical
si
tes.
R
eten
tion
of su
ch it
ems
hist
oric
her
itage
ass
ists
to
pre
serv
e th
e id
entit
y of
th
e is
land
s for
futu
re
gene
ratio
ns.
and
are
His
tori
c he
ritag
e is
als
o of
inte
rest
to v
isito
rs to
th
e C
hath
am Is
land
s. H
owev
er, i
t is i
mpo
rtan
t th
at p
hysi
cal a
dapt
atio
ns
are
prov
ided
for t
o en
able
the
heri
tage
bu
ildin
gs to
serv
e a
usef
ul p
urpo
se,
espe
cial
ly th
ose
used
for
resi
dent
ial p
urpo
ses.
3.7.
2 Is
sues
17
) •
Inap
prop
riate
su
bdiv
isio
n, u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent o
f hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts a
nd a
dditi
ons
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
sect
ion
3.7.
2 Is
sues
to re
ad –
(i)
In
appr
opria
te
subd
ivis
ion,
us
e an
d de
velo
pmen
t
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
38
item
s, po
ssib
ly
lead
ing
to a
loss
of
hist
oric
her
itage
th
ese
item
s for
futu
re
gene
ratio
ns.
• D
amag
e to
pla
ces a
nd
site
s of v
alue
to th
e Iw
i, bu
t not
pub
licly
id
entif
ied,
from
su
bdiv
isio
n, u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent.
(iii)
Inte
rnal
alte
ratio
ns
to h
erita
ge b
uild
ings
, es
peci
ally
hou
ses,
are
ofte
n ne
eded
to m
ake
them
fit f
or p
urpo
se
and
ensu
re th
e on
goin
g su
stai
nabl
e us
e of
her
itage
bu
ildin
gs.
of h
isto
ric h
erita
ge
item
s, po
ssib
ly
lead
ing
to a
loss
of
hist
oric
he
ritag
e th
ese
item
s2 fo
r fu
ture
gen
erat
ions
. (ii
) D
amag
e to
pla
ces a
nd
site
s of
val
ue t
o th
e im
i/iw
i, bu
t no
t pu
blic
ly
iden
tifie
d,
from
su
bdiv
isio
n,3
use
and
deve
lopm
ent.
(ii
)(iii
)Inte
rnal
alte
ratio
ns to
he
ritag
e bu
ildin
gs,
espe
cial
ly h
ouse
s, ar
e of
ten
need
ed to
mak
e th
em f
it fo
r pu
rpos
e an
d en
sure
th
e on
goin
g su
stai
nabl
e us
e of
he
ritag
e bu
ildin
gs4 .
Part
4 –
T
erri
tory
18
) Ret
ain
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
2 HN
Z 17
3 H
NZ
17
4 HN
Z 17
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
39
Wid
e O
bjec
tives
an
d Po
licie
s 4.
1 T
he Iw
i, (p
.30)
4.1.
3 M
etho
ds
19) T
hat f
urth
er
disc
ussi
on ta
kes p
lace
re
gard
ing
a hi
stor
ic
herit
age
inve
ntor
y (in
clud
ing
arch
aeol
ogic
al
site
s and
wāh
i tap
u).
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
4.2
Wat
er
Res
ourc
es
Polic
y 4.
2.1.
1 (i)
(c)
20) R
etai
n
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
Polic
y 4.
2.2.
1 (i)
(e)
(p.3
5)
• R
etai
n an
d ad
d to
Po
licy
4.3.
1.1(
i)(e)
: (e
) His
tori
c he
ritag
e,
cultu
ral a
nd
recr
eatio
nal v
alue
s
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Polic
y 4.
3.1.
1(i)(
e) to
read
- “(
e) H
isto
ric
herit
age,
cu
ltura
l and
recr
eatio
nal
valu
es”
4.
3, P
olic
y 4.
3.1.
1(i)(
e)
22) R
etai
n an
d ad
d to
Po
licy
4.2.
2.1(
i)(e)
(e
) His
tori
c he
ritag
e,
cultu
ral a
nd
recr
eatio
nal v
alue
s
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
Polic
y Po
licy
4.2.
2.1(
i)(e)
to re
ad
- “(e)
His
tori
c he
ritag
e,
cultu
ral a
nd re
crea
tiona
l va
lues
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
40
Her
itage
It
ems (
p.46
-47
)
23) A
men
d as
follo
ws:
4.
6 H
isto
ric
Her
itage
Ite
ms
The
issu
es in
rega
rd to
hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge a
re
disc
usse
d in
Par
t 3 a
nd in
pa
rticu
lar 3
.87.
4.
6.1
Obj
ectiv
e –
Plac
es
and
Site
s of H
isto
ric
Her
itage
Val
ue
• Th
e re
cogn
ition
and
pr
otec
tion
of p
lace
s ad
site
s his
tori
c he
ritag
e va
lue
whi
ch h
ave
an
hist
oric
al a
nd c
ultu
ral
asso
ciat
ion
with
in
the
Cha
tham
Isla
nds a
nd
its p
rote
ctio
n fr
om
inap
prop
riat
e su
bdiv
isio
n, u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent.
Rea
sons
C
ounc
il is
requ
ired
to
have
rega
rd to
reco
gnis
e an
d pr
ovid
e fo
r the
pr
otec
tion
of h
isto
ric
heri
tage
from
in
appr
opri
ate
subd
ivis
ion,
use
and
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts a
nd a
dditi
ons
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
follo
ws:
“4
.6 H
isto
ric
Her
itage
Ite
ms
The
issu
es in
rega
rd to
hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge a
re
disc
usse
d in
Par
t 3 a
nd in
pa
rticu
lar 3
.87.
A
men
d to
read
“4.
6.1
Obj
ectiv
e –
Plac
es a
nd
Site
s of H
isto
ric H
erita
ge
Val
ue (i
) The
reco
gniti
on
and
prot
ectio
n of
pla
ces a
d si
tes h
isto
ric
herit
age
valu
e w
hich
hav
e an
his
toric
al
and
cultu
ral a
ssoc
iatio
n w
ith i
n th
e C
hath
am
Isla
nds a
nd it
s pro
tect
ion
from
inap
prop
riat
e su
bdiv
isio
n, u
se a
nd
deve
lopm
ent.”
A
men
d se
ctio
n 4.
6.1
Rea
sons
to re
ad –
“C
ounc
il is
requ
ired
to h
ave
rega
rd
to re
cogn
ise
and
prov
ide
for t
he p
rote
ctio
n of
hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge fr
om
inap
prop
riat
e su
bdiv
isio
n,
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
41
deve
lopm
ent t
he
reco
gniti
on a
nd
prot
ectio
n of
her
itage
ite
ms.
Ret
entio
n of
hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge th
ese
item
s is a
n in
tegr
al p
art
of re
tain
ing
the
char
acte
r an
d va
lues
of t
he is
land
s. 4.
6.1.
1 Po
licie
s •
To id
entif
y an
d in
clud
e hi
stor
ic
herit
age
item
s in
the
Doc
umen
t’s h
erita
ge
sche
dule
(App
endi
x 3)
fo
r inf
orm
atio
n an
d re
gula
tory
pur
pose
s. (ii
) T
o en
able
inte
rnal
al
tera
tions
to
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
build
ings
in o
rder
to
prov
ide
for a
dapt
ive
re-u
se.
(iii)(
ii)D
emol
ition
, ex
teri
or a
dditi
ons a
nd
alte
ratio
ns o
r rem
oval
of
iden
tifie
d sc
hedu
led
herit
age
item
s sho
uld
not b
e al
low
ed u
nles
s it c
an
be d
emon
stra
ted
that
:
use
and
deve
lopm
ent t
he
reco
gniti
on a
nd p
rote
ctio
n of
her
itage
item
s.
Ret
entio
n of
his
tori
c he
rita
ge th
ese
item
s is a
n in
tegr
al p
art o
f ret
aini
ng
the
char
acte
r and
val
ues o
f th
e is
land
s. A
men
d 4.
6.1.
1 Po
licie
s to
read
- “
(i) T
o id
entif
y an
d in
clud
e hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge
item
s in
the
Doc
umen
t’s
heri
tage
sche
dule
(A
ppen
dix
3) fo
r in
form
atio
n an
d re
gula
tory
pu
rpos
es.
(ii)
To
enab
le in
tern
al
alte
ratio
ns to
sc
hedu
led
heri
tage
bu
ildin
gs in
ord
er to
pr
ovid
e fo
r ada
ptiv
e re
-use
. (ii
i)(ii)
Dem
oliti
on,
exte
rior
add
ition
s and
al
tera
tions
or r
emov
al
of id
entif
ied
sche
dule
d he
ritag
e ite
ms s
houl
d no
t be
allo
wed
unl
ess
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
42
• A
ny e
xter
nal a
dditi
on
or a
ltera
tion
will
not
de
tract
from
its
the
herit
age
valu
e of
the
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
•
Rel
ocat
ion
of th
e
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
is a
ble
to b
e ac
com
mod
ated
w
ithou
t hav
ing
a si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
ef
fect
on
its h
erita
ge
valu
e •
Prac
tical
util
isat
ion
of
the
a sc
hedu
led
heri
tage
item
is n
ot
poss
ible
(iv
) (iii
)To
prot
ect
reco
gnis
e H
erita
ge
New
Zea
land
as a
co
nsen
ting
auth
ority
fo
r all
arch
aeol
ogic
al
site
s and
, whe
re
rele
vant
, to
asse
ss th
e ef
fect
s of s
ubdi
visi
on,
use
and
deve
lopm
ent
on th
ese
site
s ,in
clud
ing
thos
e of
sp
ecia
l cul
tura
l
it ca
n be
dem
onst
rate
d th
at:
(a)
Any
ext
erna
l add
ition
or
alte
ratio
n w
ill n
ot
detra
ct fr
om it
s th
e he
ritag
e va
lue
of th
e sc
hedu
led
heri
tage
ite
m
(b)
Rel
ocat
ion
of th
e
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
is a
ble
to b
e ac
com
mod
ated
w
ithou
t hav
ing
a si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
ef
fect
on
its h
erita
ge
valu
e (c
) Pr
actic
al u
tilis
atio
n of
th
e a
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge it
em is
not
po
ssib
le
(iv) (
iii)T
o pr
otec
t re
cogn
ise
Her
itage
N
ew Z
eala
nd a
s a
cons
entin
g au
thor
ity
for a
ll ar
chae
olog
ical
si
tes a
nd, w
here
re
leva
nt, t
o as
sess
the
effe
cts o
f sub
divi
sion
, us
e an
d de
velo
pmen
t on
thes
e si
tes
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
43
sign
ifica
nce
to Iw
i, w
hen
cons
ider
ing
reso
urce
con
sent
ap
plic
atio
ns fr
om th
e ad
vers
e ef
fect
s of u
se
and
deve
lopm
ent.
(v
)(iv
)To
cons
ult w
ith Iw
i pr
ior t
o an
y de
velo
pmen
t whe
re
ther
e is
the
poss
ibili
ty
of d
isco
veri
ng u
pon
disc
over
y of
uru
pa
rem
ains
or o
ther
site
s of
cul
tura
l si
gnifi
canc
e.
4.6.
2.1
Met
hods
•
Use
of g
uide
lines
and
ed
ucat
ion.
•
Iden
tific
atio
n on
the
plan
ning
map
s of
hist
oric
her
itage
item
s an
d th
eir l
istin
g in
clus
ion
in th
e hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge
sche
dule
(in
Appe
ndix
3)
. •
Req
uire
reso
urce
co
nsen
t for
act
iviti
es
that
cou
ld h
ave
maj
or
adve
rse
effe
cts o
n
,incl
udin
g th
ose
of
spec
ial c
ultu
ral
sign
ifica
nce
to Iw
i, w
hen
cons
ider
ing
reso
urce
con
sent
ap
plic
atio
ns fr
om th
e ad
vers
e ef
fect
s of u
se
and
deve
lopm
ent.
(v
)(iv
)To
cons
ult w
ith
imi/i
wi p
rior t
o an
y de
velo
pmen
t whe
re
ther
e is
the
poss
ibili
ty
of d
isco
veri
ng u
pon
disc
over
y of
uru
pa
rem
ains
or w
ahi t
apu
and
noha
nga
kai
site
s.”
Am
end
sect
ion
4.6.
2.1
Met
hods
to re
ad –
(i)
Use
of g
uide
lines
and
ed
ucat
ion.
(ii
) Id
entif
icat
ion
on th
e pl
anni
ng m
aps o
f hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge it
ems
and
thei
r lis
ting
incl
usio
n in
the
hist
oric
her
itage
sc
hedu
le (i
n A
ppen
dix
3).
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
44
affe
ctin
g sc
hedu
led
hist
oric
her
itage
ite
ms.
• C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e H
erita
ge N
ew
Zeal
and
Pouh
ere
Taon
ga H
isto
ric
Plac
es A
ct 2
014
1993
in
resp
ect o
f ar
chae
olog
ical
site
s. •
Enco
urag
e th
e di
ssem
inat
ion
of
info
rmat
ion
and/
or o
n th
e pr
oces
s and
pr
otoc
ol fo
r the
di
stur
banc
e of
Iwi
arch
aeol
ogic
al a
nd
cultu
ral s
ites,
incl
udin
g th
e us
e of
ad
vice
not
es o
n re
sour
ce a
nd b
uild
ing
cons
ents
whe
re th
ere
is a
pos
sibi
lity
of
enco
unte
ring
such
si
tes.
• Th
e pu
rcha
se o
f hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge
item
s by
herit
age
auth
oriti
es a
nd
cons
ider
atio
n by
(iii)
Req
uire
reso
urce
co
nsen
t for
act
iviti
es
that
cou
ld h
ave
maj
or
adve
rse
effe
cts o
n af
fect
ing
sche
dule
d hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge it
ems.
(iv) C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e H
erita
ge N
ew Z
eala
nd
Pouh
ere
Taon
ga
His
toric
Pla
ces A
ct
2014
199
3 in
resp
ect
of a
rcha
eolo
gica
l site
s. (v
) En
cour
age
the
diss
emin
atio
n of
in
form
atio
n an
d/or
on
the
proc
ess a
nd
prot
ocol
for t
he
dist
urba
nce
of Iw
i ar
chae
olog
ical
and
cu
ltura
l site
s, in
clud
ing
the
use
of
advi
ce n
otes
on
reso
urce
and
bui
ldin
g co
nsen
ts w
here
ther
e is
a p
ossi
bilit
y of
en
coun
teri
ng su
ch
site
s. (v
i) Th
e pu
rcha
se o
f hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge it
ems
by h
erita
ge a
utho
ritie
s
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
45
Cou
ncil
to p
urch
ase
such
item
s.
Expl
anat
ion
and
Rea
sons
Th
e id
entif
icat
ion
and
listin
g sc
hedu
ling
of
hist
oric
her
itage
item
s ha
s the
pur
pose
of
educ
atin
g an
d in
form
ing
peop
le b
y m
akin
g th
em
mor
e aw
are
of a
his
tori
c he
ritag
e ite
m a
nd a
lso.
Ru
les r
equi
ring
a
reso
urce
con
sent
for
exte
rnal
cha
nges
, de
mol
ition
and
re
loca
tion
enab
le
Cou
ncil
to a
sses
s any
m
ajor
cha
nge
prop
osal
th
at m
ay a
ffec
t the
a
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge i
tem
, in
acc
orda
nce
with
cr
iteria
set o
ut in
Pol
icy
4.6.
1.2(
ii).
Rule
s en
ablin
g in
tern
al
alte
ratio
ns w
ill p
rovi
de
for a
dapt
ive
use
of
hist
oric
her
itage
. Th
e ite
ms i
dent
ified
in
the
heri
tage
sche
dule
are
and
cons
ider
atio
n by
C
ounc
il to
pur
chas
e su
ch it
ems.”
Am
end
sect
ion
4.6.
1.2
Expl
anat
ion
and
Rea
sons
to
read
– “
The
iden
tific
atio
n an
d lis
ting
sche
dulin
g of
his
tori
c he
ritag
e ite
ms h
as th
e pu
rpos
e of
edu
catin
g an
d in
form
ing
peop
le b
y m
akin
g th
em m
ore
awar
e of
a h
isto
ric
herit
age
item
an
d al
so.
Rule
s req
uiri
ng
a re
sour
ce c
onse
nt fo
r ex
tern
al c
hang
es,
dem
oliti
on a
nd re
loca
tion
enab
le C
ounc
il to
ass
ess
any
maj
or c
hang
e pr
opos
al th
at m
ay a
ffec
t th
e a
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
, in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
crite
ria se
t out
in P
olic
y 4.
6.1.
2(ii)
. Ru
les e
nabl
ing
inte
rnal
alte
ratio
ns w
ill
prov
ide
for a
dapt
ive
use
of
hist
oric
her
itage
. Th
e ite
ms i
dent
ified
in th
e he
rita
ge sc
hedu
le a
re
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
46
liste
d by
on
the
Her
itage
N
ew Z
eala
nd
List
/Rar
angi
Kor
ero,
H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tru
st
whi
ch h
as in
acc
orda
nce
with
spec
ific
crite
ria
for
the
regi
stra
tion
of su
ch
item
s. T
his d
oes n
ot
prec
lude
oth
er it
ems
bein
g ad
ded
to th
e lis
t sc
hedu
le b
y a
chan
ge to
th
e do
cum
ent.
Purc
hase
of i
tem
s by
herit
age
auth
oriti
es (e
g.
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tru
st)
and
the
cons
ider
atio
n of
su
ch it
ems f
or p
urch
ase
by C
ounc
il ar
e ot
her
met
hods
. C
ounc
il en
cour
ages
lia
ison
with
Iwi p
rior t
o de
velo
pmen
t in
orde
r tha
t si
tes o
f cul
tura
l val
ue c
an
be id
entif
ied.
If a
n ar
chae
olog
ical
site
is
dist
urbe
d th
en Iw
i mus
t be
con
tact
ed in
ord
er th
at
appr
opria
te a
ctio
n ca
n be
un
derta
ken.
In
addi
tion,
liste
d by
on
the
Her
itage
N
ew Z
eala
nd L
ist/R
aran
gi
Kor
ero,
His
toric
Pla
ces
Trus
t whi
ch h
as in
ac
cord
ance
with
spec
ific
crite
ria
for t
he re
gist
ratio
n of
such
item
s. T
his d
oes
not p
recl
ude
othe
r ite
ms
bein
g ad
ded
to th
e lis
t sc
hedu
le b
y a
chan
ge to
th
e do
cum
ent.
Purc
hase
of i
tem
s by
herit
age
auth
oriti
es (e
.g.
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tru
st) a
nd
the
cons
ider
atio
n of
such
ite
ms f
or p
urch
ase
by
Cou
ncil
are
othe
r met
hods
. C
ounc
il en
cour
ages
liai
son
with
Iwi p
rior t
o de
velo
pmen
t in
orde
r tha
t si
tes o
f cul
tura
l val
ue c
an
be id
entif
ied.
If a
n ar
chae
olog
ical
site
is
dist
urbe
d th
en Iw
i mus
t be
cont
acte
d in
ord
er th
at
appr
opria
te a
ctio
n ca
n be
un
derta
ken.
In
addi
tion,
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
47
the
mod
ifica
tion
or
dest
ruct
ion
of a
n ar
chae
olog
ical
site
s as
soci
ated
with
hum
an
activ
ity p
rior t
o 19
00 a
re
is li
kely
to re
quire
an
auth
ority
from
the
Her
itage
New
Zea
land
H
isto
ric
Plac
es T
rust
if a
pr
opos
al se
eks t
o m
odify
, da
mag
e or
des
troy
a si
te.
4.6.
1.3
Ant
icip
ated
En
viro
nmen
tal R
esul
ts
• In
crea
sed
reco
gniti
on
of h
isto
ric
herit
age
item
s. •
Ret
entio
n of
his
tori
c he
rita
ge it
ems
incl
udin
g ar
chae
olog
ical
and
cu
ltura
l site
s.
the
mod
ifica
tion
or
dest
ruct
ion
of a
n ar
chae
olog
ical
site
s as
soci
ated
with
hum
an
activ
ity p
rior t
o 19
00 a
re is
lik
ely
to re
quire
an
auth
ority
from
the
Her
itage
N
ew Z
eala
nd H
isto
ric
Plac
es T
rust
if a
pro
posa
l se
eks t
o m
odify
, dam
age
or
dest
roy
a si
te.”
A
men
d se
ctio
n 4.
6.1.
3 A
ntic
ipat
ed E
nviro
nmen
tal
Res
ults
to re
ad -
(i)
Inc
reas
ed re
cogn
ition
of
his
tori
c he
ritag
e ite
ms.
(ii)
Ret
entio
n of
his
tori
c he
rita
ge it
ems
incl
udin
g ar
chae
olog
ical
and
cu
ltura
l site
s.
Polic
y 4.
12.1
(ii)
(p.5
4)
24) A
dd to
Pol
icy
4.12
.1.1
(ii)
Any
subd
ivis
ion
shou
ld
avoi
d th
e po
ssib
le
adve
rse
effe
cts o
f de
velo
pmen
t on
A
ccep
t: A
dd re
quire
d w
ords
to P
olic
y 4.
12.1
(ii)
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
to P
olic
y 4.
12.1
.1(ii
) to
read
– “
Any
su
bdiv
isio
n sh
ould
avo
id
the
poss
ible
adv
erse
eff
ects
of
dev
elop
men
t on
sign
ifica
nt in
dige
nous
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
48
sign
ifica
nt in
dige
nous
ve
geta
tion
and
habi
tats
, ou
tsta
ndin
g la
ndsc
ape
feat
ures
, his
tori
c he
rita
ge, a
nd th
e na
tura
l ch
arac
ter o
f wat
er b
odie
s an
d th
e co
asta
l en
viro
nmen
t.
vege
tatio
n an
d ha
bita
ts,
outs
tand
ing
land
scap
e fe
atur
es, h
isto
ric
heri
tage
, an
d th
e na
tura
l cha
ract
er o
f w
ater
bod
ies a
nd th
e co
asta
l env
ironm
ent.
4.12
.1.2
(ii)
Met
hods
25
) Ret
ain
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
Tab
le
4.12
.1.(i
i) (p
56-5
7)
26) R
etai
n
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
4.13
.2.4
. 27
) Ret
ain
and
add
the
term
“hi
stor
ic h
erita
ge”
in “
Purp
ose”
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
Rur
al Z
one
Obj
ectiv
es
5.3.
2
28) R
etai
n
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
Met
hods
5.
3.2.
2(i)
(p66
)
29) A
dd “
hist
oric
he
ritag
e” in
reas
ons a
nd
expl
anat
ion
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
5.7.
4(i)
(p98
) Po
licy
5.6.
4.1(
i) (p
.99)
30) O
ppos
e –
Am
end
5.7.
4 to
add
“H
isto
ric
Her
itage
” an
d ad
d th
e te
rm in
(i) a
nd in
Pol
icy
5.7.
4.1
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
t and
add
ition
N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
49
5.6.
5.1
Polic
y (ii
)(b)
(p.9
9)
31) S
uppo
rt, b
ut
renu
mbe
r
Acc
ept:
Ren
umbe
r N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Part
5
Rul
e 5.
3.4.
6 (p
.70)
R
ules
5.
4.3.
8 (p
.82)
5.
7.4
(p.1
18)
32) S
uppo
rt in
par
t, bu
t am
end
herit
age
rule
s in
Rur
al a
nd S
ettle
men
t Zo
ne a
s fol
low
s:
Perm
itted
Act
ivity
: (i)
In
tern
al
alte
ratio
n to
any
he
rita
ge si
te o
r bu
ildin
g sc
hedu
led
in
Appe
ndix
3.
(ii)
Exte
rnal
repa
irs
or m
aint
enan
ce to
a
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
(inc
ludi
ng
rede
cora
tion
and/
or
rest
orat
ion)
pro
vide
d th
at th
e w
ork
is
carr
ied
out w
ith
mat
eria
ls si
mila
r to,
or
havi
ng th
e sa
me
appe
aran
ce to
thos
e or
igin
ally
use
d.
Alte
ratio
n to
any
he
rita
ge si
te a
nd b
uild
ing
A
ccep
t: A
men
d th
e he
ritag
e ru
les a
s req
uire
d w
ith th
e su
gges
ted
addi
tions
, am
endm
ents
and
del
etio
ns.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Am
end
the
herit
age
rule
s as r
equi
red
with
the
sugg
este
d ad
ditio
ns, a
men
dmen
ts a
nd
dele
tions
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
50
liste
d in
App
endi
x 3
and
show
n on
the
Plan
ning
M
ap is
per
mitt
ed if
: •
The
wor
k is
re
deco
ratio
n an
d/or
re
stor
atio
n an
d;
• Th
e w
ork
is c
arri
ed
out w
ith m
ater
ials
si
mila
r to
or h
avin
g th
e sa
me
appe
aran
ce
to th
ose
orig
inal
ly
used
. D
iscr
etio
nary
Act
ivity
: •
Any
activ
ities
that
is
not p
rovi
ded
for a
s co
ntra
vene
a p
erm
itted
ac
tivity
con
ditio
n in
clud
ing
exte
rnal
ad
ditio
ns a
nd
alte
ratio
ns, d
emol
ition
an
d re
mov
al a
re is
a
disc
retio
nary
act
ivity
. As
sess
men
t Cri
teri
a •
The
exte
nt to
whi
ch th
e hi
stor
ical
inte
grity
he
rita
ge v
alue
of t
he
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
will
be
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
51
com
prom
ised
by
the
prop
osed
wor
k.
• W
heth
er th
e pr
opos
ed
wor
k al
tera
tion
will
as
sist
in re
tain
ing
the
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
. •
The
com
men
ts o
f the
H
erita
ge N
ew Z
eala
nd
His
tori
c Pl
aces
Tru
st.
• Th
e fin
anci
al
impl
icat
ions
of
allo
win
g/no
t allo
win
g th
e pr
opos
ed w
ork
alte
ratio
n, d
emol
ition
an
d re
mov
al.
• Th
e ex
tent
to w
hich
in
tegr
atio
n of
the
prop
osed
wor
k al
tera
tion
is in
tegr
ated
w
ith th
e or
igin
al
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge
item
.
Expl
anat
ion
The
rule
pro
vide
s for
pr
otec
tion
of sc
hedu
led
hist
oric
her
itage
site
s an
d bu
ildin
gs. C
onse
nt is
re
quir
ed fo
r wor
ks
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
52
anyt
hing
oth
er th
an
inte
rnal
min
or
alte
ratio
ns o
r min
or
exte
rnal
repa
irs o
r m
aint
enan
ce.
R
ule
5.3.
4.26
(p
.77)
R
ule
5.4.
3.25
(p
.87)
R
ule
5.5.
4.24
(p
.96)
R
ules
5.
6.11
.17
(p.1
15)
Rul
e 5.
7.4
(p.1
18)
33) O
ppos
e: d
elet
e al
l th
ese
rule
s and
repl
ace
with
adv
ice
note
(p
rovi
ded)
A
ccep
t: D
elet
e th
e ru
les
and
repl
ace
with
the
advi
ce
note
pro
vide
d.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Del
ete
the
rule
s an
d re
plac
e w
ith th
e ad
vice
no
te p
rovi
ded.
Ear
thw
orks
R
ules
: R
ule
5.3.
4.10
(p
.71)
R
ule
5.4.
6.15
(p
.84)
34) S
uppo
rt in
par
t: )
Supp
ort i
n pa
rt: a
dd to
A
sses
smen
t Crit
eria
(a)
for D
iscr
etio
nary
A
ctiv
ity th
e w
ords
“h
isto
ric h
erita
ge”
A
ccep
t: D
elet
e th
e ru
les
and
repl
ace
with
the
advi
ce
note
pro
vide
d.
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Del
ete
the
rule
s an
d re
plac
e w
ith th
e ad
vice
no
te p
rovi
ded.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
53
Rul
e 5.
5.3.
13
(p.9
3)
Rul
e 5.
7.4
(p11
8)
Roa
ding
R
ules
: R
ule
5.4.
3.11
(p
.69)
R
ule
5.4.
6.16
(p
.82)
R
ule
5.5.
3.13
(p
.93)
R
ule
5.7.
4
35) O
ppos
e in
par
t: ad
d to
Ass
essm
ent C
riter
ia
(b) f
or D
iscr
etio
nary
A
ctiv
ity th
e w
ords
, “h
isto
ric h
erita
ge”
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d te
rm
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Add
the
requ
ired
term
.
Subd
ivis
ion
Rul
es:
Rul
e 5.
3.4.
12
(pp.
71-7
2)
Rul
e 5.
4.3.
14
(p.8
3)
Rul
e 5.
5.3.
12
Rul
e 5.
7.4
(p.1
18)
36) S
uppo
rt in
par
t: ad
d to
Ass
essm
ent C
riter
ia
(g) f
or D
iscr
etio
nary
A
ctiv
ity th
e w
ords
“h
isto
ric h
erita
ge”
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d te
rm
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Add
the
requ
ired
term
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
54
Part
6
Def
initi
ons:
A
rcha
eolo
gic
al S
ite
37) O
ppos
e: A
dd a
de
finiti
on o
f ar
chae
olog
ical
site
to
Part
6 as
follo
ws:
Ar
chae
olog
ical
Site
m
eans
: •
any
plac
e in
New
Ze
alan
d, in
clud
ing
any
build
ing
or
stru
ctur
e (o
r par
t of a
bu
ildin
g or
st
ruct
ure)
, tha
t—
• w
as a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith h
uman
ac
tivity
that
oc
curr
ed b
efor
e 19
00 o
r is t
he si
te
of th
e w
reck
of
any
vess
el w
here
th
e w
reck
oc
curr
ed b
efor
e 19
00; a
nd
prov
ides
or m
ay
prov
ide,
thro
ugh
inve
stig
atio
n by
ar
chae
olog
ical
m
etho
ds, e
vide
nce
rela
ting
to th
e
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d de
finiti
on
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Add
the
requ
ired
defin
ition
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
55
hist
ory
of N
ew
Zeal
and;
As
def
ined
in th
e H
erita
ge N
ew Z
eala
nd
Pouh
ere
Taon
ga A
ct
2014
.
Def
initi
ons:
H
isto
ric
Her
itage
38) O
ppos
e: A
dd
defin
ition
of h
isto
ric
herit
age
as fo
llow
s:
His
toric
Her
itage
mea
ns:
(a)
tho
se n
atur
al a
nd
phys
ical
reso
urce
s tha
t co
ntri
bute
to a
n un
ders
tand
ing
and
appr
ecia
tion
of N
ew
Zeal
and'
s his
tory
and
cu
lture
s, de
rivi
ng fr
om
any
of th
e fo
llow
ing
qual
ities
: (i)
a
rcha
eolo
gica
l: (ii
) a
rchi
tect
ural
: (ii
i) c
ultu
ral:
(iv)
his
tori
c:
(v)
sci
entif
ic:
(vi)
tec
hnol
ogic
al; a
nd
(b) i
nclu
des—
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d de
finiti
on
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Add
the
requ
ired
defin
ition
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
56
(i)
his
tori
c si
tes,
stru
ctur
es, p
lace
s, an
d ar
eas;
and
(ii
) a
rcha
eolo
gica
l si
tes;
and
(ii
i) si
tes o
f sig
nific
ance
to
Mao
ri, i
nclu
ding
w
āhi t
apu;
and
(iv
) su
rrou
ndin
gs
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e na
tura
l and
phy
sica
l re
sour
ces
D
efin
ition
of
Rep
airs
an
d M
aint
enan
ce
39) O
ppos
e: in
clud
e a
defin
ition
of r
epai
rs a
nd
mai
nten
ance
as f
ollo
ws:
Re
pair
of a
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge it
em m
eans
the
rest
orat
ion
to g
ood
or
soun
d co
nditi
on o
f any
bu
ildin
g or
obj
ect (
or a
ny
part
of)
for t
he p
urpo
se
of it
s mai
nten
ance
. M
aint
enan
ce o
f a
sche
dule
d he
rita
ge it
em
mea
ns th
e pr
otec
tive
care
of
a p
lace
.
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d de
finiti
on
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Add
the
requ
ired
defin
ition
.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
57
App
endi
x 3-
Her
itage
B
uild
ings
an
d si
tes
40) S
uppo
rt in
par
t: R
etai
n bu
t mak
e am
endm
ents
: map
re
fere
nce
for P
onga
W
hare
to
Map
1
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d am
endm
ent
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept:
Add
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
t.
Her
itage
B
uild
ings
an
d si
tes
(p.1
34)
41) O
ppos
e: A
dd th
e fo
llow
ing
plac
es: H
ough
C
otta
ge –
loca
ted
on
Hos
pita
l Roa
d, W
aita
ngi
(Cat
egor
y 1
His
toric
Pl
ace,
Lis
t No.
538
7).
• So
lom
on H
omes
tead
–
loca
ted
on O
wen
ga
Roa
d, M
anuk
au
(Cat
egor
y 1
His
toric
Pl
ace,
Lis
t No.
539
5).
NB
: Ev
en th
ough
ther
e ar
e on
ly re
mna
nts o
f th
e bu
ildin
g le
ft, th
e si
te h
as b
een
reta
ined
on
the
regi
ster
bec
ause
of
its h
isto
ric
sign
ifica
nce.
•
Mei
kle
Hou
se –
loca
ted
on B
ig B
ush
Roa
d, T
e O
ne (C
ateg
ory
2 H
isto
ric P
lace
, Lis
t No.
53
97).
• N
airn
Hou
se –
loca
ted
on M
aipi
to R
oad,
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e su
gges
ted
plac
es, w
ith th
e co
nsen
t of
the
land
owne
rs.
At t
he h
earin
g H
NZ
indi
cate
d th
at th
e co
nsen
t of
the
land
owne
rs h
as n
ot
been
obt
aine
d. A
t thi
s po
int,
thes
e pl
aces
will
not
be
add
ed to
the
Sche
dule
.
Rej
ect.
No
chan
ges
requ
ired.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
58
Wai
tang
i (C
ateg
ory
1 H
isto
ric P
lace
, Lis
t No.
54
00).
• G
erm
an M
issi
on H
ouse
–
loca
ted
on W
aita
ngi
Wes
t Roa
d, M
aung
anui
C
ateg
ory
1 H
isto
ric
Plac
e, L
ist N
o. 5
401)
. •
Tom
my
Solo
mon
St
atue
– lo
cate
d on
O
wen
ga R
oad,
M
anuk
au (W
āhi T
apu,
Li
st N
o. 9
281)
. A
dd to
App
endi
x 3
the
loca
tion
and
desc
riptio
n of
thes
e an
d ot
her p
lace
s (p
rovi
ded)
Paua
mac
Indu
stry
Ass
ocia
tion
(PM
I)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns R
eque
sted
Po
licy
4.2.
3.1
(iv)
• Su
ppor
t
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Obj
ectiv
es
4.3.
2, 5
.7.7
•
Supp
ort
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
59
Obj
ectiv
e 5.
6.2
• Su
ppor
t
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Obj
ectiv
e 5.
7.3
• Su
ppor
t
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Polic
y 5.
6.5.
1 •
Supp
ort
A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Rul
es fo
r th
e C
MA
5.
6.11
A
sses
smen
t C
rite
ria
for
Stru
ctur
es
Gen
eral
6) a
men
d (j)
to re
ad a
s fo
llow
s: e
ffec
ts o
n fis
herie
s res
ourc
es a
nd
fishi
ng a
ctiv
ity
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Ass
essm
ent
Cri
teri
a fo
r M
aint
enan
ce
etc
• am
end
(e) t
o re
ad a
s fo
llow
s: th
e po
tent
ial f
or
effe
cts o
n fis
heri
es
reso
urce
s and
in
terf
eren
ce w
ith fi
shin
g ac
tiviti
es
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Ass
essm
ent
Cri
teri
a fo
r (6
) D
istu
rban
ce
etc
and
(7)
Dep
ositi
on
• A
dd n
ew a
sses
smen
t cr
iterio
n ef
fect
s on
fishi
ng a
ctiv
ity
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
60
Are
as o
f Si
gnifi
cant
N
atur
al
Val
ue (1
8)
Ass
essm
ent
Cri
teri
a
• A
dd (c
) effe
cts o
n fis
heri
es re
sour
ces a
nd
fishi
ng a
ctiv
ity
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Ass
essm
ent
Cri
teri
a fo
r (2
0) O
ther
ac
tiviti
es
• A
men
d (f
) to
read
as
follo
ws:
effe
cts o
n fis
heri
es re
sour
ces a
nd
fishi
ng a
ctiv
ity
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Def
initi
on
of fi
sher
ies
reso
urce
s
• In
clud
e Fi
sher
ies A
ct
defin
ition
: F
ishe
ries
reso
urce
s –
mea
ns a
ny 1
or m
ore
stoc
ks o
r spe
cies
of f
ish,
aq
uatic
life
, or s
eaw
eed
Fis
hing
–
• M
eans
the
catc
hing
, ta
king
, or h
arve
stin
g of
fis
h, a
quat
ic li
fe, o
r se
awee
d;
And
• In
clud
es –
•
Any
activ
ity th
at m
ay
reas
onab
ly b
e e
xpec
ted
to re
sult
in th
e ca
tchi
ng,
taki
ng, o
r har
vest
ing
of
A
ccep
t: A
dd th
e re
quire
d de
finiti
on
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Add
the
sugg
este
d de
finiti
on.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
61
fish,
aqu
atic
life
, or
seaw
eed;
and
•
Any
oper
atio
n in
supp
ort
of o
r in
prep
arat
ion
for
any
activ
ities
des
crib
ed
in th
is d
efin
ition
O
bjec
tive
for
aqua
cultu
re
• A
men
d th
e O
bjec
tive
to re
ad a
s add
: ‘…
whi
le a
void
ing
rem
edyi
ng o
r miti
gatin
g an
y ad
vers
e ef
fect
s of
aqua
cultu
re
deve
lopm
ent
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Polic
y 4.
2.4.
1 (T
e W
hang
a)
• A
men
d th
e ex
plan
atio
n to
read
: Cou
ncil
will
co
nsul
t w
ith Iw
i and
ot
her a
ffec
ted
parti
es,
such
as l
ando
wne
rs, t
he
fishi
ng in
dust
ry, a
nd th
e D
epar
tmen
t of
Con
serv
atio
n
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
5.6.
6.2
Met
hods
(C
oast
al
Proc
esse
s)
13) A
men
d (iv
) to
read
: ‘n
on re
gula
tory
met
hods
su
ch a
s edu
catio
n an
d co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith
pote
ntia
lly a
ffect
ed
part
ies i
nclu
ding
the
fishi
ng in
dust
ry e
tc.
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
62
Rul
es,
CM
A, R
ule
12
Dis
char
ge
of H
uman
Se
wag
e
• A
men
d (iv
) to
read
: The
di
scha
rge
of h
uman
se
wag
e to
coa
stal
wat
er
is a
dis
cret
iona
ry
activ
ity if
: prio
r co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith Iw
i, po
tent
ially
affe
cted
pa
rtie
s inc
ludi
ng th
e fis
hing
indu
stry
, and
the
publ
ic h
as b
een
carr
ied
out
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
addi
tion
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
Isla
nds C
ounc
il (C
IC)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns
Req
uest
ed
App
endi
x 2
Des
igna
tions
• A
men
d an
d co
rrec
t en
tries
in A
ppen
dix
2 an
d th
e co
rres
pond
ing
plan
ning
map
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts a
nd
corr
ectio
ns
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
App
endi
x 3
– H
erita
ge
Bui
ldin
gs
and
Site
s
• C
orre
ct a
map
re
fere
nce
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
corr
ectio
n N
o ch
ange
to
reco
mm
enda
tion
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Plan
ning
M
aps
• D
elet
e Pa
ges 1
36-1
38
as th
ey a
re re
peat
ed;
and
Am
end
the
lege
nd o
f th
e Pl
anni
ng M
aps a
nd
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
dele
tions
, am
endm
ents
and
co
rrec
tions
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
63
dele
te “
New
Zea
land
H
isto
ric P
lace
s Tru
st
(NZH
PT) a
nd re
plac
e w
ith H
erita
ge It
ems-
Ap
pend
ix 3
D
elet
e “U
nreg
iste
red
Her
itage
Item
s”
Add
, “A
ppen
dix
1” to
A
reas
of S
igni
fican
t N
atur
al V
alue
; A
nd A
ppen
dix
2 to
D
esig
nate
d Si
te (D
1)
Am
end
Plan
ning
M
aps b
y de
letin
g a
num
ber o
f reg
iste
red
Item
s and
a n
umbe
r of
othe
r cor
rect
ions
Ref
eren
ces
to N
ew
Zeal
and
His
tori
c Pl
aces
Tru
st
• A
men
d al
l ref
eren
ces
to N
ew Z
eala
nd
His
toric
Pla
ces T
rust
an
d A
ct to
Her
itage
N
ew Z
eala
nd P
ouhe
re
Taon
ga a
nd H
erita
ge
New
Zea
land
Pou
here
Ta
onga
Act
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Was
te
Man
agem
ent
• A
men
d Po
licy
4.11
.1.1
and
Rul
e 5.
3.4.
24 a
s fol
low
s:
A
ccep
t: M
ake
the
requ
ired
amen
dmen
ts a
nd
corr
ectio
ns
No
chan
ge to
re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
64
and
Rul
e 5.
3.4.
24
To
clo
se th
e ex
istin
g K
aing
aroa
, Ow
enga
an
d Te
One
land
fills
on
ce a
n ap
prop
riate
lo
catio
n fo
r a th
e re
plac
emen
t is
oper
atin
g id
entif
ied
and
appr
opria
te
appr
oval
s gra
nted
R
ule
5.3.
4.24
: add
into
or
, in
24
and
in (i
) In
5.3
.4 u
nder
Pe
rmitt
ed, d
elet
e an
d ex
istin
g la
ndfil
ls a
nd
in E
xpla
natio
n, d
elet
e,
and
mat
eria
l to
land
fills
N
ew Z
eala
nd F
ire
Serv
ice
Com
mis
sion
(NZ
F)
Ref
eren
ce
Dec
isio
ns R
eque
sted
(p
refix
NZ
F)
Polic
y 4.
12.2
.1(i)
(b)
and
Rul
es
• Su
ppor
t – 5
.3.4
(20(
i),
(c).
5.4.
3 (2
1)(i)
, (b)
. 5.
4.3(
20)(
i), (c
). 5.
4.3
(21)
(i), (
c)
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
reco
mm
enda
tion
A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
65
5.5.
3(17
)(i),
(c).
5.5.
3(21
(i), (
c). P
olic
y 4.
12.2
.1 (i
), (b
) R
ules
to
refle
ct N
ZFS
C
ode
• A
dd th
e fo
llow
ing
sent
ence
to R
ural
Zon
e R
ule
5.3.
3. 1
2(h)
The
N
ew Z
eala
nd F
ire
Serv
ice
Fire
fight
ing
wat
er su
pplie
s Cod
e of
Pr
actic
e SN
Z PA
S 45
09:2
008
mus
t be
used
as
a g
uide
rega
rdin
g fir
efig
htin
g w
ater
su
pply
and
acc
ess.
Acc
ept:
Mak
e th
e re
quire
d ad
ditio
n N
o ch
ange
to re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Def
initi
on o
f em
erge
ncy
serv
ices
• Su
ppor
t as w
ritte
n A
ccep
t N
o ch
ange
to re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
No
chan
ge
requ
ired.
Def
initi
on o
f N
oise
•
Supp
ort a
s writ
ten
Acc
ept
No
chan
ge to
reco
mm
enda
tion
A
ccep
t. N
o ch
ange
re
quire
d.
Air
di
scha
rges
•
In R
ule
5.3.
4.18
(i) a
nd
Rul
e 5.
4.6.
18(i)
and
R
ule
5.5.
3.22
(i) a
dd, i
n br
acke
ts, t
he fo
llow
ing,
(li
ve b
urns
con
duct
ed
and
cont
rolle
d by
the
New
Zea
land
Fir
e Se
rvic
e fo
r tra
inin
g pu
rpos
es a
re e
xem
pt
from
this
rule
).
Acc
ept:
Mak
e th
e re
quire
d ad
ditio
n N
o ch
ange
to re
com
men
datio
n
Acc
ept.
Am
end
as
requ
este
d.
Cha
tham
s Is
land
s C
ounc
il –
Prop
osed
Cha
tham
Isla
nds
Res
ourc
e M
anag
emen
t Doc
umen
t Jul
y 20
14
Rep
ort a
nd D
ecis
ion
of th
e H
earin
gs C
omm
ittee
P
age
66
