IN MEMORY · IN MEMORY OF RICHARD CONROY The United Nations Development Assistance Framework for...
Transcript of IN MEMORY · IN MEMORY OF RICHARD CONROY The United Nations Development Assistance Framework for...
IN MEMORY OF RICHARD CONROY
The United Nations Development Assistance Framework for Uzbekistan is dedicated to the memory of Mr. Richard Conroy, the late UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Resident Representative, who inspired the vision of the strategy. Mr. Conroy was tireless in his commitment to UNDAF. His contribution to the preparation of this docu-ment inspired all those who worked with him and made UNDAF a reality.
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
UNDAF Outcome 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10UNDAF Outcome 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11UNDAF Outcome 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11UNDAF Outcome 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12UNDAF Outcome 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Cooperation Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
ESTIMATED RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . 15
IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
MONITORING AND EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ANNEXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
UNDAF Results Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20Monitoring and Evaluation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Monitoring and Evaluation Programme Cycle Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31Indicative Programme Resource Framework . . . . . . 32
ABBREVIATIONS
4
ABA/CEELI American Bar Association’s Central and East European Law Initiative
ADB Asian Development Bank
AEFI Adverse Events Following Immunization
BFHI Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative
CAS Country Assistance Strategy
CAT Committee Against Torture
CCA Common Country Assessment
CEDAW Convention on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
CEM Country Economic Memorandum
CER Centre for Economic Research
CERD Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination
CDC Centre for Disease Control
CLCs Community Learning Centers
CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child
CSOs Civil Society Organizations
CT Country Team
DHS Demographic and Health Survey
DOTS Directly Observed Treatment Short Course
EBF Exclusive Breast Feeding
EC European Community
EFA Education for All
EIC Information, Education and Communication
EMIS Education Management and Information System
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EPI Extended Immunization Programme
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
GEF Global Environmental Facility
GFATM Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
GKI State Committee for State Property Management and Entrepreneurship Support
DDR Drug Demand Reduction
HBS Household Budget Survey
HES Health Examination Survey
HR Human Rights
HRBAP Human Rights Based Approach
ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Culturail Rights
ICPD International Conference on Population and Development
IECD Information, Education, and Communication Development
ILO International Labour Organization
IMAL Institute for Monitoring of Active Legislation
IMCI Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses
IREX International Research and Exchange Board
IPPF International Planned Parenthood Federation
KAP Knowledge, Attitude and Practice
LBD Live Birth Definition
LSA Living Standards Assessment
MCH Mother and Child Health
MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs
MFIs Micro-credit Financing Institutes
5
MDGs Millennium Development Goals
MDGR Millennium Development Goals Report
MICS Multi Indicator Cluster Survey
MLA Monitoring of Learning Achievements
MN Micronutrients
MOAWM Ministry of Agriculture and Water Management
MOE Ministry of Economy
MOH Ministry of Health
MOHE Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education
MOI Ministry of Interior
MOIA Ministry of Internal Affairs
MOJ Ministry of Justice
MOLSP Ministry of Labour and Social Protection
MOPE Ministry of Public Education
NASP National Association of Salt Producers
NGOs Non-governmental Organizations
N/HDR National /Human Development Report
NHRC National Human Rights Centre
OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights
OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
OSI Open Society Institute
PHC Primary Health Care
PLWHA People Living with HIV/AIDS
POP Persistent Organic Pollutants
PRS Poverty Reduction Strategy
RC Resident Coordinator
RH Reproductive Health
SM Safe Motherhood
SMES Small and Medium Enterprises
SSC State Statistics Committee
STIs Sexually Transmitted Infections
TB Tuberculosis
TRACECA Transport Corridor Europe Caucasus Asia
UARH Uzbek Association of Reproductive Health
UNDESA UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs
UNDAF UN Development Assistance Framework
UNDMT UN Disaster Management Team
UNDP UN Development Programme
UNESCO UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNHCR UN High Commissioner for Refugees
UNICEF UN Children’s Fund
UNIDO UN Industrial Development Organization
UNFPA UN Population Fund
UNODC UN Office on Drugs and Crime
USAID United States Agency for International Development
VCT Voluntary Counseling and Testing
WB World Bank
WHO World Health Organization
YFS Youth Friendly Services
FOREWORD
tive priorities of the UN System, the Government and civil society and links them directly to individual UN agency country programme outcomes and outputs. The strategy covers a period of five years (2005–2009).
Although five years represent a significant period in our lives, it is only a brief, yet crucial period in the continuous path of national development. Conscious of this challenge, UNDAF brings together and maximizes the collective strengths of the UN system and the national partners to achieve the national development priorities.
UNDAF is instrumental in helping the UN system to identify joint programming opportunities and thus maximize the impact of UN development activities and produce concrete results. It also sets up a monitoring and evaluation plan which will help the UN system, the Government and development partners to keep track of progress towards agreed collective indicators according to the Millennium Development Goals and Uzbekistan’s priorities.
The United Nations Development Assistance Fra-mework (UNDAF) for Uzbekistan is the first common
strategy of the United Nations system to assist the Government in meeting the development challenges of Uzbekistan.
UNDAF has been prepared in close consultation between the Governmental executive agencies and the United Nations Country Team and was presented at the Joint Strategy Meeting in February 2004.
UNDAF is a testament by the Government, the United Nations system, and the civil society to renewed cooperation in the spirit of promoting development. UNDAF is a feasible strategy to promote development for all and is anchored in the capacities of the country to respond to the challenges posed by the transition and to improve the quality of life for all citizens.
UNDAF is based on the Millennium Development Goals and development priorities as identified in the Common Country Assessment. UNDAF sets out collec-
6
Galina K. Saidova First Deputy Minister of Economy Republic of Uzbekistan
Fikret Akcura United Nations Resident Coordinator in Uzbekistan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The United Nations Development Assistance Frame-work (UNDAF) is the business plan of the UN Country
Team for the period 2005–2009. UNDAF provides a framework for the UN reform at the country level to ensure coordinated and coherent programming, which is aligned with the MDGs and the national priorities of Uzbekistan.
UNDAF is the result of an ongoing consultative process between the United Nations Country Team (UNCT), the Government, and development partners to simplify and harmonize UN interventions at the country level, so as to achieve clear and measurable results.
UNDAF intends to contribute to the achievement of the MDGs by setting an operational framework, including a monitoring and evaluation system based on MDGs and a financing framework for all UN development activities in the country.
UNDAF will guide the UN System to support the reform process currently underway in Uzbekistan. In doing so, it will focus on four interrelated priority areas:improvement of living standards, access to and quality of basic services (health and education), harmonization of national laws and regulations in accordance with international conventions and good governance.
7
SIGNATURES
We, the United Nations Country Team in Uzbekistan, while respecting each organization’s mandates,
competences and decision making processes, pledge our commitment to collaborative programming as a means to foster cooperation and coordination among all our agencies and to enhance the performance and impact of our joint response to development assist-ance in Uzbekistan.
Fikret AkcuraUN Resident Coordinator
Barry LaneUNESCO Representative
Nesim TumkayaUNFPA Representative
Abdul Karim GhoulUNHCR Chief of Mission
Brenda S. VigoUNICEF Head of Office
James CallahanUNODC Regional Representative
Arun NandaWHO Representative
Martin RaiserWorld Bank Country Manager
Lykke AndersenUNDP Deputy Resident Representative
8
9
INTRODUCTION
representatives from the civil society and international development partners. The participants were also briefed on UN reform, UNDAF formulation, harmoni-zation and simplification of UN procedures as well as results-based management.
A follow-up workshop was conducted in December 2003, coinciding with the preparation of UNDP, UNICEF and UNFPA Country Programme Documents. The work-shop finalized and validated the five UNDAF outcomes, the draft country programme outcomes and outputs of UNDP, UNICEF and UNFPA, and incorporated outputs from other contributing UN agencies. In addition, a number of national priorities were identified in relation to MDG targets and indicators for Uzbekistan.
UNDAF preparation process coincides with the last phase of the elaboration of the “Strategy for Improving the Living Standards of the People of Uzbekistan”, which provides a framework for improving the living standards of the population and related activities in the country. Through UNDAF, the UN system aims at contributing an MDG-based focus to implement the strategy, which will primarily be achieved through the preparation of a Millennium Development Goals Report, includ-ing the process of nationalization of the MDG targets and indicators, and monitoring the progress towards achieving the MDGs.
UNDAF represents the first common operational framework of the UN system in Uzbekistan. It builds on the UN system’s continued mandate and presence in Uzbekistan to assist the Government in reducing socio-economic disparities and to protect the most vulnerable during the process of transition to a market economy and a democratic society. While UNDAF in-terventions target the entire country, special emphasis will be put on selected regions in sustainable human development, education, health, harmonization and implementation of international conventions, and support for good governance.
UN system will use a combination of sectoral and regional approaches so as to benefit the most disadvan-taged areas of the country and the most vulnerable con-stituents, such as the unemployed, rural people without secure access to land and water, children with special needs, and youth at risk as identified in the CCA.
The United Nations Development Assistance Frame-work (UNDAF) for Uzbekistan was prepared by the
UN Country Team (UNCT) on the basis of the Common Country Assessment (CCA), and in close consultation with the Government, civil society and international community. UNDAF is guided by national priorities, the Millennium Development Goals and international conventions to which Uzbekistan is party and focuses on strengthening capacity at national and local levels, with the aim to: (i) develop successful strategies for the improvement of living standards throughout the country, (ii) enhance basic services in the country, spe-cifically with regard to health and education services, (iii) further harmonize national legislation with relevant international UN instruments, and (iv) build the capaci-ties of, and partnerships between, Government and civil society. Human rights and gender are mainstreamed throughout UNDAF.
The focus of UNDAF was decided at a meeting in July 2003, bringing together UN system, Government and
RESULTS
UNDAF relies on the analysis and priorities identi-fied in the CCA. Within this framework, and in
full consultation with the Government as well as the development partners, UNDAF identifies four strategic areas of priority for the United Nations system for the period 2005–2009. These are: improvement of living standards, access to quality basic services (education and health), harmonization of national laws and regu-lations in accordance with international conventions, and good governance.
These priority areas were selected on the basis of previous experiences and lessons learned by the UN system in Uzbekistan and its comparative advantages. The critical assumption behind UNDAF is that by con-centrating most of the UN resources on these four pri-ority areas, the UN system and its partners will directly and substantially contribute to the achievement of the national priorities in relation to the MDGs.
The formulation of the Strategy for the Improvement of Living Standards further represents a unique op-portunity for the UN system to integrate the MDGs into the national development policies providing op-portunities for a cross-sectoral approach and building stronger partnerships with the Government, interna-tional financial institutions and other donors and civil society organizations.
UNDAF OUTCOME 1Strengthened national and local level capacity to develop, implement, and monitor strategies for improving living standards.
The process of transition continues to be a defining feature of Uzbekistan’s development. However, in the situation of macroeconomic stability there is a need to focus efforts on the improvement of living conditions of population.
Macroeconomic stability and restored economic growth have put in place the basis for moving to a market economy more rapidly. The CCA shows that while the economic policies adopted after inde-pendence have guaranteed stable economic growth, this yet has to translate into sustainable increase of living standards and optimal distribution of fruits of growth.
An estimated 27.5% of the population is unable to meet basic consumption needs with about a third of them particularly affected. In recognition of this situa-tion, the Government has been developing a strategy
to improve living standards with technical assistance from the Asian Development Bank and UNDP.
In line with main directions and indicators of the Strategy to improve living standards and as defined by the UN’s MDG Baseline Study for Uzbekistan, the goal of this UNDAF outcome is to enhance living standards and reduce the proportion of the population consum-ing less than 2,100 calories a day from 27.5 percent in 2002 to 14 percent in 2015.
This UNDAF outcome focuses on capacity building for improved skills and knowledge by the national authorities in the formulation and implementation of pro-poor policy formulation as well as in living stand-ards monitoring, on one hand. On the other hand, the UN CT will act at the local level by supporting access to quality community based social services and new sources of income.
This integrated, multidisciplinary approach will inclu-de analysis, elaboration and implementation of sectoral and regional programmes and initiatives. Geographically, the UN interventions will also focus on the southern re-gions notably Kashkadaria; the north-western region, no-tably the Republic of Karakalpakstan; and the Ferghana Valley, in particular the Namangan region.
Sectorally, efforts will therefore focus on enhanc-ing the competitiveness of the agro processing sector, promote micro, small and medium-scale enterprises and decentralized industrial development, in order to create employment opportunities in rural areas and reduce regional income disparities, thus ultimately fighting poverty at its very source.
The main partners in this outcome are: the Govern-ment, Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, na-tional think tanks such as the Centre for Economic Research (CER), the European Community, policy mak-ers and regional and local institutions, as well as local communities and civil society organizations (CSOs).
10
11
Thus, the specific focus is to assist the Government and local communities in their efforts to achieve univer-sal access by all children to primary education, improved quality of education, improved child rearing practices and better child preparedness for school. This approach emphasizes the creation of a learning environment for basic education that promotes the acquisition of relevant life skills by both boys and girls. Support will also be provided to develop a national policy for inclu-sive/integrated education, enhanced skills for teaching children with special needs and supporting child caring practices for disabled children.
Recognized partners for the achievement of this shared outcome are: the Ministry of Public Education, local pedagogical institutes, families and communities, Asian Development Bank, and USAID.
UNDAF OUTCOME 3By 2009, equitable access to quality primary health care services is improved.
Despite recent progress, current levels of malnutrition, communicable and non-communicable diseases are still a constraint on human development. In that con-nection, rates of drug use, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis continue to be a cause of concern. There is a need to improve the quality of and access to primary health care services, knowledge and skills of health professionals at all levels through training and upgrading.
Though child malnutrition, which was reported as being ‘high’ in 1996, may have improved, it continues to be of concern. Infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, and a rise in reported incidences of TB by 40% between 1990–1996, are issues of special concern, especially in certain regions (for example, Tashkent oblast for HIV/AIDS and Karakalpakstan for TB).
This UNDAF outcome contributes to the achieve-ment of the national goals to reduce child and maternal mortality and to halt and reverse the rates of HIV/AIDS as outlined in the Health Sector Reform Programme, the Primary Health Care Initiative and the Strategic Programme on Response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic (2003–2006). Thus, this UNDAF outcome fits with the MDGs of improving child and maternal health and stopping and reversing the epidemic of HIV/AIDS.
The main thrust of the outcome is a combination of advocacy and policy advice towards an improved national policy environment for better health. It further aims to promote the improvement of quality health
UNDAF OUTCOME 2By 2009, improved quality of basic education is achieved.
Based on the Government’s strong emphasis on increas-ing education coverage and quality, the UN system will support the efforts to ensure all regions and citizens benefit from the education drive.
The national development priorities in the areas of education coincide with those of the MDGs. Those for primary education are reflected in the “Strategy for Improving the Living Standards of the People of Uzbekistan”, as well as in a number of other pro-grammes such as the Primary Health Care Initiative and the National Programme for Personnel Training, and various other decrees and projects.
The national target contained in the National Programme for Personnel Training is to increase quality of general education for all boys and girls so that they can continue their education in colleges and academic lyceums after graduating from 9th grade.
Under the framework of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the outcome will contribute to the sustainable development of children, adolescents and women in a nurturing, caring and protective en-vironment.
This UNDAF outcome supports the national goal of ensuring quality education for all children. In that regard geographic focus will be on Karakalpakstan, Khorezm, Bukhara, Kashkadarya, Ferghana and Tashkent regions. Particular attention will be paid to: (i) increasing pre-school attendance at higher education level; (ii) promot-ing the attendance of girls; (iii) improving the quality of education for children with learning impediments, including those with language difficulties.
services and the increased utilization of these services among men, women and young people. Assistance will be pursued through introduction of innovative and cost effective cross-sectoral, human rights-based ap-proaches to complement the efforts of the Government and communities in health, education and social protec-tion of children, women, youth and refugees.
As identified in the CCA, the strategy is to focus on a number of selected regions requiring priority interven-tions for the improvement of the situation of all citizens. UN interventions to address these problems will be facilitated by mapping socio-economic conditions against agreed qualitative and quantitative indica-tors including: family structures, reproductive health behaviour, social expenditure, income distribution and poverty, for improved geographic targeting.
Similar to Outcome 2, the geographic areas of focus will be Karakalpakstan, Bukhara, Khorezm, Kashkadarya, Ferghana and Tashkent region. In addition, specific UN interventions in the field of reproductive health are targeted to the regions of Andijan, Namangan, Khorezm and Jizzak which overlap with the targeted areas for promotion of reproductive rights and strengthening of civil society.
The main partners in achieving this outcome are: the Ministries of Health and Public and Higher Education and the Cabinet of Ministers. Other partners include: the Republican AIDS Centre, primary health care in-stitutions at the national level, as well as communities and health professionals. At the donor level, partners include the Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, USAID and a number of national and international NGOs who are active in the field of health.
UNDAF OUTCOME 4By 2009, domestic laws are harmonized with UN legal instruments, including human rights, envi-ronmental and refugee conventions, and their im-plementation and monitoring improved.
An important objective in this field is to promote the establishment and implementation of a national legal
framework capable of reconciling the national security and developmental interests of Uzbekistan with increased respect for human rights, including those of refugees.
The Government of Uzbekistan has, since its inde-pendence in 1991, ratified many international human rights conventions, including the six “core” human rights treaties, thereby committing itself to take ef-fective, legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to ensure that human rights are respected and protected in Uzbekistan. Over the last decade, the Government of Uzbekistan has advanced in the devel-opment of several laws and institutional structures for the promotion and protection of human rights. Given the developments, attention is now turning to further alignment of legislation with international standards and improving the capacity of the institutions to imple-ment them effectively.
The national goal that this outcome is supporting is to ensure stability and security for creation of a democratic society and the implementation of international con-ventions to which the country is a party, including the Millennium Declaration. The achievement of the UNDAF outcome is primarily guided by the harmonization of national legislation with relevant UN legal instruments, including conventions on human rights, environment and improved legal protection of refugees.
In achiving this outcome, UNDAF relies on the UN system’s comparative advantages of impartiality and neutrality, access to international and regional ‘best prac-tices’, and an extensive global and regional experience in these particular areas. This outcome aims at increasing the capacity of the relevant Governmental institutions and civil society to be engaged in a constructive dialogue, foster partnerships and involve in effective implementa-tion and monitoring of international conventions.
This outcome has two main foci: 1) the advance-ment of human rights including, those of children and refugees; and 2) the enhancement of environmental protection in Uzbekistan.
In the field of human rights, particular attention will be given to: i) enhancing national capacity to integrate Uzbekistan’s national legal framework with its interna-
12
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
13
Results
tional human rights obligations; and ii) raising awareness on international human rights principles and enhancing population’s access to the judicial structures.
The UN system will provide technical assistance and ad-visory services in the area of law making processes and to strengthen the capacity to sustain legislative development in Uzbekistan. Furthermore, support will be provided to raising the awareness of the citizens on national legislation and international human rights standards and building the capacity of the relevant Governmental institutions and civil society organisations to provide enhanced legal services, especially for the most disadvantaged or vulner-able segment of the population.
In the field of environment, support will be provided to the Government in meeting international commit-ments on environment and sustainable development and integrating them into national development policy and planning. In close cooperation with the Global Environmental Facility, attention will be paid to assist the Government and local communities in preserving biodiversity, promoting sustainable land management and introducing renewable energy technologies.
The main partners in the achievement of this out-come include the relevant ministries, the Institute for Monitoring of Active Legislation (IMAL), the Committee for the Protection of Nature, the Prosecutor’s Office, the Ombudsman, the Women’s Committee and in-ternational partners such as OSCE, the American Bar Association/Central and East European Law Initiative (ABA/CEELI), and other interested donors.
UNDAF OUTCOME 5Strengthened Government and civil society ca-pacity and partnership towards more effective governance.
After barely a decade since the creation of the sover-eign Republic of Uzbekistan, challenges of transition continue. Among those are the further alignment of the executive, legislative and judicial branches, broadening the dialogue between the formal structures and the citizens, enhancing the role of local and municipal au-
thorities, and strengthening the civil service to deliver timely and quality services.
As the democratization process continues, there will be an ever-increasing transition from a predomi-nantly Government-run national development strategy towards a more participatory model, necessitating a dynamic, responsive and responsible community of citizens. Local mechanisms aiming towards decentrali-zation have demonstrated a comparatively high level of efficiency and effectiveness and require further sup-port to consolidate previous gains, and continue the progress made in protecting those most vulnerable.
The CCA acknowledges that there is a need for targeted support to the Government and society at large in identi-fying key policy options to make the model of transition more effective, transparent and equitable, particularly with regard to participation of civil society and quality of life. Thus, this UNDAF outcome is based on the assump-tion that improved governance is a main prerequisite for achieving the MDGs and Uzbekistan’s national goals.
In order to achieve this outcome, the UN system will support capacity building of civil society organizations to engage in policy dialogue and monitoring with the Government. This will be pursued through capacity building exercises such as training of human resources, and, focusing on disparity reduction, human rights, gender equality, meeting community needs, disaster preparedness and border management.
Thus, the UN will support locally based and civic activi-ties (notably the youth, the patients, people living with HIV/AIDS and refugees) aimed at promoting dialogue and partnerships with the national authorities, for example in the sector of pre-primary education, health service delivery and municipal services (such as water and sanitation).
Recognized partners include regional and local authori-ties, neighbourhood associations (mahallas), Parliamentary Committees, administrative and judicial bodies, and Governmental institutions. The main international part-ners identified are USAID, ABA/CEELI, Mercy Corps, OSCE, Freedom House and the European Community. At the level of civil society, collaboration with diverse representation of NGOs and CSOs will be pursued.
14
System will integrate and mainstream human rights and gender concerns into UN programming through all five UNDAF outcomes and will serve as the main cooperation strategy for the UN CT in the field of iden-tification, implementation and monitoring of UN joint programming.
The MDG team composed of national MDG experts will continue to provide specialized and expert advice in the identification of nationalized targets and indica-tors and at a later stage, of localization and monitoring of MDGs. The UNCT will ensure that the work carried out by the MDG Team is streamlined into the UNDAF and through it into the country programmes, down to programme and project interventions for a full align-ment of country programmes and national priorities with the MDGs.
The choice of partners is based on their potential for long term impact on national goals and priorities based on a) their mandates and areas of expertise; b) the availability of funding and/or the ability to mobili-ze funds to carry out the required activities to achieve the planned outcome in a timely and efficient manner Lessons learned, good practices and opportunities to strengthen national capacities and international cooperation were also used in this identification proc-ess. The partners and their specific function and role in the achievement of each UNDAF outcome are elabo-rated in Table 1 “UNDAF Result Matrix.”
COOPERATION STRATEGIES
The UNDAF outlines the UN strategy for Uzbekistan and how the UN agencies will work together in a collabo-rative and mutually supporting way, also in a focused, targeted manner according to the mandate of each agency. Almost all of the UNDAF outcomes are shared between at least two or more agencies. This not only allows for synergy between individual agencies, but also avoids possible duplication or unnecessary overlap. The UNDAF will create opportunities for cooperation during the implementation of the respective country programme outcomes and outputs. Thus, the individual UN agencies, funds and programmes will formulate their work during 2005–2009 based on the UNDAF and will use the UNDAF monitoring and evaluation plan to spur continuous evaluation of individual programmes as well as their combined effect in meeting the UNDAF outcome. To this purpose the UN RC will establish a MDG and UNDAF coordination body to support the work of the CCA/UNDAF/MDGR Steering Committee, which is co-chaired by the Government and the UN RC.
The UN Theme Group on HIV/AIDS will continue to provide within each UNDAF outcome a structure enabling various agencies to coordinate United Nations support to the national response to HIV/AIDS and support an expanded multi-sectoral response to the epidemic. Likewise, the UN Resident Coordinator
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
ESTIMATED RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
The estimated financial resources required by the United Nations for their contribution to achieve each
expected outcome in UNDAF are presented below (Annexes, “UNDAF Programme Resource Framework”). The contributions include regular and extra-budg-etary resources of the UN Agencies, and Funds and Programmes, which are expected to be available during the period of 2005–2009. The country programme ac-tion plans, and programme and project documents will serve as the officially recognized operational mecha-nisms for the commitments made in accordance with the rules and procedures of the UN agencies.
The UN Country Team, through joint advocacy and the UN Resident Coordinator System’s mechanism, will, to the extent possible, mobilize additional resources from multi and bilateral donors who have traditionally supported UN collaborative programmes. Emphasis will be placed on developing and implementing a strategy to mobilize funds for parallel and joint advocacy, ad-visory and programming initiatives.
15
16
IMPLEMENTATION
UNDAF will be implemented by means of Government-approved country programmes of the UN agencies.
Individual UN country programmes will have a clear and explicit reference to UNDAF outcomes and will clarify how they contribute to achieve the overall objectives of UNDAF. The World Bank and the ADB will also refer to UNDAF when elaborating, tailoring and monitoring their assistance programmes.
The harmonized programme cycle of UNICEF, UNDP and UNFPA, during 2005–2009, will increase the pos-sibility of joint planning, implementation and moni-toring of outcomes. Other agencies such as UNESCO, WHO, UNHCR and UNODC will provide specialized assistance and/or support in the mobilization of funds and in sharing of existing resources, including human
resources. UNDAF primarily adds value by providing a UN-system-wide platform for discussion of individual programs of the agencies.
As the business plan of the UN, UNDAF focuses on concrete results. In order to keep track of the out-comes, UNDAF indicators will be aligned with MDG indicators. These indicators will be further localized and refined during the preparation of the MDGR to be presented in the Millennium Development Goals Report.
The UN RC Annual Reports and work plans will record the progress made by the UN and the accrued value added. Lessons learned, and best practices result-ing from joint program outcomes will also be outlined in the reports.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
The UN will utilize a results-based management ap-proach as the primary tool for evaluating UNDAF in
2008 to assess impact, relevance, and sustainability. The evaluation mechanisms of UNDAF will also focus on effectiveness, vis-à-vis, UNDAF and country programme outcomes and efficiency gains of a simplified and harmonized UN system at the country level.
Monitoring of UNDAF outcomes will be continu-ous with regular monitoring progress reports. The
“UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Plan” (in Annexes) illustrates how focus on outcomes, baselines, sources of verifications and indicators will enable monitoring and assessment, and spur a continuous analysis of the development situation. The CCA/UNDAF/MDGR Steering Committee composed of Government, UN, civil society and international development partners, who oversaw the process of preparation of the CCA/UNDAF, will remain to ensure continuity in monitoring and evaluation of UNDAF outcomes.
Monitoring mechanisms will include: MDG analysis and reporting, poverty reduction reporting, coordinated field visits for shared and related outcomes and where the geographic focus is shared (for example with UNICEF and UNFPA in the areas of child and maternal health), joint reviews, stakeholder meetings, desk reviews, as-sessment reports and standard donors project reports, and other mechanisms such as country programme action plans and harmonized annual work plans.
Evaluation will be primarily linked to measuring progress towards the achievement of MDGs and trends in that direction. It will include recommendations, high-light lessons learned, and encourage the use of best practices to improve performance in accordance with an evaluation plan prepared jointly with all strategic partners.
The plan indicates the objectives, indicators, timing and data collection, and reporting mecha-nisms. The “Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar” for UNDAF encourages cluster evaluations that reflect the synergy and complementation of outcomes (in Annexes).
The RC Annual Report format will reflect UNDAF monitoring and evaluation mechanisms and the outcomes. The main vehicle to coordinate the im-plementation and monitoring of UNDAF is the MDG/UNDAF Coordination Group, which will report to the UN Resident Coordinator twice a year. The Group will produce bi-annual reports on progress made against UNDAF outcomes for review by the Government and UN system. The MDG/UNDAF Coordination Group will act as the main coordination mechanism of the UN to ensure: a) coordination of MDG efforts; b) follow up actions on and coordination of the monitoring, imple-mentation and evaluation mechanisms of UNDAF; c) identification and support of opportunities for joint programming.
17
19
ANNEXES
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK FOR UZBEKISTAN (2005–2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Priority Area 1: Improvement of Living Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20Priority Area 2: Access to Quality Basic Services—Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Priority Area 3: Access to Quality Basic Services—Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22Priority Area 4: Harmonization of National Laws and Regulations in Accordance with International Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23Priority Area 5: Good Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
MONITIORING AND EVALUATION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Priority Area 1: Improvement of Living Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Priority Area 2: Access to Quality Basic Services—Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Priority Area 3: Access to Quality Basic Services—Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27Priority Area 4: Harmonization of National Laws and Regulations in Accordance with International Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29Priority Area 5: Good Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAMME CYCLE CALENDAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
INDICATIVE PROGRAMME RESOURCE FRAMEWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
20
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
UN
DA
F R
ESU
LTS M
ATR
IX
Pri
ori
ty A
rea 1
: Im
pro
vem
en
t of
Liv
ing S
tan
da
rds
Nat
ion
al P
rio
riti
es o
r M
DG
s
“To
enh
ance
livi
ng
stan
dar
ds
and
red
uce
the
pro
po
rtio
n of
the
po
pul
atio
n co
nsum
ing
less
than
210
0 ca
lori
es a
day
fro
m 2
7.5
per
cent
in 2
001
to 1
4 p
erce
nt in
201
5” (S
trat
egy
for I
mp
rovi
ng
of th
e Li
vin
g St
and
ard
s of
the
Peo
ple
of
Uzb
ekis
tan)
.
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e
“Str
eng
then
ed n
atio
nal
an
d lo
cal l
evel
cap
acit
y to
dev
elo
p, i
mp
lem
ent a
nd
mo
nit
or s
trat
egie
s fo
r im
pro
vin
g liv
ing
stan
dar
ds.
”
Co
un
try
Ou
tco
me
Ro
le o
f par
tner
sR
eso
urc
e M
ob
ilis
atio
n
1.1.
Sus
tain
able
hum
an d
evel
op
men
t po
licie
s to
imp
rove
live
liho
od
s an
d ac
cess
to s
oci
al s
ervi
ces
by
the
po
or d
evel
op
ed a
nd
thei
r im
ple
-m
enta
tio
n m
on
ito
red
in a
cco
rdan
ce w
ith
MD
Gs
(UN
DP,
UN
FPA
an
d U
NIC
EF).
• U
ND
P, U
NFP
A, U
NIC
EF—
coll
abo
rati
ve a
nd
join
t p
rog
ram
min
g;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k, W
orl
d B
ank,
USA
ID, E
uro
pea
n C
om
mu
nit
y—te
ch-
nic
al a
ssis
tan
ce a
nd
fu
nd
ing
;•
Min
istr
y o
f Eco
no
my,
Min
istr
y o
f Lab
ou
r, St
ate
Stat
isti
cs C
om
mit
tee
and
lin
e m
inis
trie
s, W
om
en’s
Co
mm
itte
e—ex
ecu
tio
n, i
mp
lem
en
tati
on
, mo
nit
or-
ing
an
d c
oo
rdin
atio
n;
• R
egio
nal
an
d L
oca
l au
tho
riti
es, C
ivil
Soci
ety
Org
aniz
atio
ns—
coo
rdin
atio
n;
• C
entr
e fo
r Eco
no
mic
Res
earc
h, A
cad
emia
—re
sear
ch a
nd
po
licy
ad
vice
.
UN
DP,
reg
ular
—U
SD 4
.00
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
3.0
0 m
illio
nU
NFP
A, c
ore
—U
SD 0
.50
mill
ion
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 1
.79
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
1.2
3 m
illio
n
1.2.
Po
or a
nd
vuln
erab
le p
eop
le’s
acc
ess
to q
ualit
y co
mm
unit
y b
ased
so
cial
ser
vice
s im
pro
ved
and
new
so
urce
s of
inco
me
crea
ted
(UN
DP,
U
NIC
EF, W
HO
an
d U
NES
CO).
• U
ND
P, U
NIC
EF, U
NES
CO
, WH
O—
coll
abo
rati
ve a
nd
join
t p
rog
ram
min
g;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k, W
orl
d B
ank,
Eu
rop
ean
Co
mm
un
ity,
USA
ID—
tech
-n
ical
ass
ista
nce
an
d f
un
din
g;
• M
inis
try
of E
con
om
y, M
inis
try
of A
gri
cult
ure
, Sta
te S
tati
stic
s C
om
mit
tee—
imp
lem
en
tati
on
an
d c
oo
rdin
atio
n;
• R
egio
nal
an
d lo
cal a
uth
ori
ties
, Civ
il So
ciet
y O
rgan
izat
ion
s—co
ord
inat
ion
;•
Cen
tre
for E
con
om
ic R
esea
rch
—re
sear
ch a
nd
ad
vice
.
UN
DP,
reg
ular
—U
SD 3
.09
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
6.0
0 m
illio
nU
NIC
EF, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.9
9 m
illio
n, o
ther
—U
SD 1
.46
mill
ion
UN
ESCO
—U
SD 0
.50
mill
ion
WH
O, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.0
2 m
illio
n
1.3.
Pro
du
ctiv
ity
and
com
pet
itiv
enes
s of
the
agro
-pro
cess
ing
ind
ustr
y se
cto
r en
han
ced
(UN
IDO
).•
The
Min
istr
y o
f Eco
no
my,
Ch
amb
er o
f Tra
de
and
Ind
usr
ty o
f Uzb
ekis
tan
, M
inis
try
of A
gri
cult
ure
, th
e St
ate
Pro
per
ty F
un
d (G
KI)
, th
e A
gen
cy fo
r Ex
tern
al E
con
om
ic R
elat
ion
s—im
ple
me
nta
tio
n a
nd
co
ord
inat
ion
;•
Bu
sin
ess
Incu
bat
ors
an
d T
ech
no
Par
ks, A
sso
ciat
ion
of T
exti
le In
du
stri
es, t
he
Ass
oci
atio
n o
f Ch
emic
al P
rod
uce
rs, t
he
Ass
oci
atio
n o
f Tex
tile
Ind
ust
ries
(U
zbek
eng
ilsan
oat
), U
zmev
asab
zavo
t—im
ple
me
nta
tio
n.
UN
IDO
—to
be
det
erm
ined
.
Co
ord
inat
ion
and
pro
gra
mm
e m
od
alit
ies
UN
DA
F w
ill s
upp
ort
a c
om
bin
atio
n of
up
stre
am a
nd
dow
nstr
eam
act
ivit
ies.
In o
rder
to e
nsur
e su
stai
nab
ility
an
d ow
ner
ship
of d
owns
trea
m a
ctiv
itie
s, a
n ap
-p
roac
h of
dec
entr
aliz
ed e
xper
imen
tati
on
will
be
app
lied
, wh
ere
loca
lly g
ener
ated
init
iati
ves
will
be
faci
litat
ed a
nd
sup
po
rted
. Th
is a
pp
roac
h w
ill fa
cilit
ate
cros
s le
arn
ing
, lo
cal n
etw
ork
s an
d up
sca
ling
of d
emo
nstr
atio
n p
roje
cts.
Sup
po
rt w
ill a
lso
be
pro
vid
ed to
Gov
ern
men
t fo
r th
e fo
rmul
atio
n of
‘up
stre
am’ d
evel
op
-m
ent p
lans
wh
ich
iden
tify
lon
ger
term
gro
wth
op
po
rtun
itie
s an
d ec
on
om
ic d
evel
op
men
t pri
ori
ties
. Th
is a
pp
roac
h w
ill s
eek
to u
nit
e ke
y G
over
nm
ent a
gen
cies
, in
tern
atio
nal
do
no
r org
aniz
atio
ns a
nd
, wh
ere
app
rop
riat
e, C
SOs
and
pri
vate
sec
tor r
epre
sent
ativ
es w
ith
in a
co
mm
on
fram
ewo
rk fo
r act
ion
. Th
e co
ord
inat
ion
and
pro
gra
mm
e m
od
alit
ies
for t
his
out
com
e re
volv
e ar
oun
d th
e U
N c
ont
rib
utio
n to
the
pre
par
atio
n of
the
Inte
rim
Str
ateg
y fo
r th
e Im
pro
vem
ent o
f Liv
ing
Co
nd
itio
ns (w
hic
h w
as p
rep
ared
wit
h th
e su
pp
ort
fro
m A
DB)
, its
imp
lem
enta
tio
n an
d m
on
ito
rin
g. T
he
UN
has
inco
rpo
rate
d th
e te
ntat
ive
MD
G n
atio
nal
targ
ets
and
ind
icat
ors
into
UN
DA
F an
d w
ill u
se U
ND
AF
to a
dvo
cate
for t
he
incl
usio
n of
nat
ion
al M
DG
targ
ets
and
ind
icat
ors
into
the
stra
teg
y an
d th
e liv
ing
stan
dar
ds
anal
ysis
. Th
e m
ain
coo
rdin
atio
n m
ech
anis
ms
for t
he
nat
ion
aliz
atio
n of
the
MD
Gs
and
thei
r int
egra
tio
n in
the
stra
teg
y w
ill c
ont
inu
e to
be
the
CCA
/UN
DA
F/M
DG
R St
eeri
ng
Co
mm
itte
e in
clo
se c
oo
per
atio
n w
ith
the
Stat
e St
atis
tics
Co
mm
itte
e su
pp
ort
ed b
y U
ND
P.
21
Annexes
UN
DA
F R
ESU
LTS M
ATR
IX
Pri
ori
ty A
rea 2
: A
ccess
to Q
ua
lity
Ba
sic
Serv
ices—
Ed
uca
tion
Nat
ion
al P
rio
riti
es o
r M
DG
s
“Ens
ure
that
all
child
ren
, boy
s an
d g
irls
, co
mp
lete
9th
gra
de
of a
qua
lity
edu
cati
on”
—Th
e St
rate
gy
for t
he
Imp
rove
men
t of t
he
Livi
ng
Stan
dar
ds
of th
e Pe
op
le o
f Uzb
ekis
tan
and
Nat
ion
al P
rog
ram
me
for P
erso
nn
el T
rain
ing
.
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e
“By
2009
, im
pro
ved
qua
lity
of b
asic
ed
uca
tio
n is
ach
ieve
d”
Co
un
try
Ou
tco
me
Ro
le o
f par
tner
sR
eso
urc
e M
ob
ilis
atio
n
2.1.
Lea
rnin
g en
viro
nm
ent f
or b
asic
ed
uca
tio
n p
rom
otin
g g
end
er
equa
lity,
nee
ds-
bas
ed a
nd
life
skill
s ed
uca
tio
n is
intr
od
uce
d an
d im
-p
lem
ente
d in
sel
ecte
d ar
eas
(UN
ICEF
, UN
ESCO
an
d U
NA
IDS)
.
• U
NIC
EF, U
NES
CO
an
d U
NA
IDS—
coll
abo
rati
ve a
nd
join
t p
rog
ram
min
g;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k, U
SAID
PEA
KS
and
Wo
rld
Ban
k—te
chn
ical
ass
ist-
ance
an
d f
inan
cin
g;
• M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic E
du
cati
on
, Ped
ago
gic
al In
stit
ute
s—im
ple
me
nta
tio
n a
nd
co
ord
inat
ion
;•
Co
un
terp
art
Co
nso
rtiu
m—
coo
rdin
atio
n.
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.95
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.9
7 m
illio
nU
NES
CO—
USD
0,7
0 m
illio
n
2.2.
Acc
ess
to b
asic
ed
uca
tio
n fo
r ch
ildre
n w
ith
(phy
sica
l an
d m
enta
l im
pai
rmen
ts a
nd
lan
gua
ge
dif
ficu
ltie
s) is
imp
rove
d in
sel
ecte
d ar
eas
(UN
ICEF
, UN
ESCO
, UN
HC
R an
d W
HO
).
• U
NIC
EF, U
NES
CO
, UN
HC
R, W
HO
—co
llab
ora
tive
an
d jo
int
pro
gra
mm
ing
;•
Min
istr
y o
f Pu
blic
Ed
uca
tio
n, M
inis
try
of H
ealt
h, M
inis
try
of L
abo
ur a
nd
So
cial
Pro
tect
ion
—co
ord
inat
ion
, exe
cuti
on
, mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d im
ple
me
n-
tati
on
;•
Mah
alla
s an
d lo
cal h
oki
mya
ts, N
GO
s—co
ord
inat
ion
.
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.48
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.7
5 m
illio
nU
NH
CR
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.11
mill
ion
UN
ESCO
—U
SD 0
.50
mill
ion
WH
O—
reg
ular
USD
0.0
2 m
illio
n
2.3.
Fam
ilies
’ ch
ild-b
eari
ng
pra
ctic
es fo
r pre
- an
d p
ost-
nat
al c
are,
de-
velo
pm
ent a
nd
pro
tect
ion
are
imp
rove
d in
sel
ecte
d ar
eas
(UN
ICEF
).•
Min
istr
y o
f Hea
lth
an
d M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic E
du
cati
on
—co
ord
inat
ion
exe
cu-
tio
n, m
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
imp
lem
en
tati
on
;•
USA
ID—
coo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
fu
nd
ing
;•
Loca
l Go
vern
men
t/h
oki
mya
ts; M
ahal
la c
om
mit
tees
—co
ord
inat
ion
;•
Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank—
tech
nic
al a
ssis
tan
ce a
nd
fu
nd
ing
.
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.85
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.7
0 m
illio
n
Co
ord
inat
ion
and
pro
gra
mm
e m
od
alit
ies
A d
on
or c
oo
rdin
atio
n m
ech
anis
m is
bei
ng
esta
blis
hed
for t
he
edu
cati
on
sect
or t
o ov
erse
e co
ng
ruen
cy a
nd
com
ple
men
tari
ty o
f int
erve
ntio
ns (U
NIC
EF, U
NES
CO,
WB,
USA
ID, a
nd
IREX
).
22
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
UN
DA
F R
ESU
LTS M
ATR
IX
Pri
ori
ty A
rea 3
: A
ccess
to Q
ua
lity
Ba
sic
Serv
ices—
Hea
lth
Nat
ion
al P
rio
riti
es o
r M
DG
s
“Red
uce
Infa
nt M
ort
alit
y b
y 2/
3 b
y 20
15”,
“Dec
reas
e M
ater
nal
Mo
rtal
ity
by
1/3
by
2015
”, “H
alt a
nd
Reve
rse
the
Risi
ng
Tren
d in
HIV
-AID
S Pr
eval
ence
Rat
e b
y 20
15”.
Nat
ion
al T
arg
ets
and
Sho
rt a
nd
Mid
Ter
m G
oal
s of
the
Nat
ion
al
Pro
gra
mm
e o
n Re
du
ctio
n of
Infa
nt a
nd
Ch
ild M
ort
alit
y an
d St
rate
gic
Pro
gra
mm
e o
n C
oun
tera
ctio
n to
HIV
/AID
S Ep
idem
ic in
the
Rep
ublic
of U
zbek
ista
n.
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e
“By
2009
, eq
uita
ble
acc
ess
to q
ualit
y p
rim
ary
hea
lth
care
ser
vice
s is
imp
rove
d”.
Co
un
try
Ou
tco
me
Ro
le o
f par
tner
sR
eso
urc
e M
ob
ilis
atio
n
3.1.
Imp
rove
d n
atio
nal
po
licy
envi
ron
men
t fo
r bet
ter h
ealt
h (U
NIC
EF,
UN
FPA
, WH
O, U
NH
CR
and
UN
OD
C).
• U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, W
HO
, UN
OD
C, U
NH
CR
—co
llab
ora
tive
, jo
int
pro
gra
m-
min
g;
• M
inis
try
of H
ealt
h, J
ust
ice
and
Hig
her
Ed
uca
tio
n, P
arlia
men
t, C
abin
et o
f M
inis
ters
, In
stit
ute
of H
ealt
h—
exe
cuti
on
, co
ord
inat
ion
an
d im
ple
me
nta
-ti
on
;•
USA
ID, W
orl
d B
ank,
Cen
tre
for D
isea
se C
on
tro
l, W
om
en’s
Co
mm
itte
e—co
or-
din
atio
n a
nd
fu
nd
ing
;•
You
th o
rgan
izat
ion
s—co
ord
inat
ion
.
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.35
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.3
8 m
illio
nU
NFP
A, c
ore
—U
SD 0
.10
mill
ion
, co
ord
inat
ing
and
assi
stan
ce—
USD
0.3
0 m
il-lio
nU
NO
DC
, pro
ject
fun
ds—
USD
0.1
4 m
illio
n (s
har
ed a
mo
ng
task
s 3.
1, 3
.2, 3
.3).
UN
HC
R, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.1
7 m
illio
nW
HO
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.20
mill
ion
3.2.
Th
e q
ualit
y of
ser
vice
s fo
r Mat
ern
al a
nd
Ch
ild H
ealt
h, c
om
mun
ica-
ble
dis
ease
s, n
utri
tio
n, y
oun
g p
eop
le’s
an
d re
pro
du
ctiv
e h
ealt
h in
se-
lect
ed p
rovi
nce
s is
imp
rove
d (U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, W
HO
, UN
OD
C).
• U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, W
HO
, UN
OD
C—
coll
abo
rati
ve a
nd
join
t p
rog
ram
min
g;
• M
inis
try
of H
ealt
h a
nd
Inst
itu
te o
f Hea
lth
—ex
ecu
tio
n, i
mp
lem
en
tati
on
an
d c
oo
rdin
atio
n,
• St
ate
Stat
isti
cs C
om
mit
tee,
Min
istr
y o
f Fin
ance
mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d in
form
atio
n;
• U
zdo
nm
akh
sulo
t—co
ord
inat
ion
;•
Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank,
Wo
rld
Ban
k, U
SAID
—te
chn
ical
ass
ista
nce
an
d
fun
din
g;
• C
entr
e fo
r Dis
ease
Co
ntr
ol,
NA
SP a
nd
NG
Os—
coo
rdin
atio
n.
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.95
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
1.1
3 m
illio
nU
NFP
A, c
ore
—U
SD 1
.00
mill
ion
, mul
ti-b
i—U
SD 0
.30
mill
ion
UN
OD
C, p
roje
ct fu
nd
s—U
SD 0
.14
mill
ion
(sh
are
amo
ng
the
task
in 3
.1, 3
.2, 3
.3).
WH
O, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.6
0 m
illio
n
3.3.
Incr
ease
d ut
iliza
tio
n of
pri
mar
y h
ealt
h ca
re s
ervi
ces
and
imp
rove
d h
ealt
h-s
eeki
ng
beh
avio
ur a
mo
ng
men
, wo
men
an
d yo
ung
peo
ple
in
sele
cted
are
as (U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, W
HO
, UN
AID
S, U
NO
DC
).
• U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, W
HO
, UN
AID
S an
d U
NO
DC
—co
mm
on
an
d jo
int
pro
gra
m-
min
g;
• M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic E
du
cati
on
, Min
istr
y o
f Hig
her
Ed
uca
tio
n; C
abin
et o
f M
inis
ters
, Min
istr
y o
f Hea
lth
—ex
ecu
tio
n, i
mp
lem
en
tati
on
, mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d c
oo
rdin
atio
n;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k an
d W
orl
d B
ank—
tech
nic
al a
ssis
tan
ce a
nd
fu
nd
-in
g;
• A
ll Pr
imar
y H
ealt
h C
are
Un
its—
coo
rdin
atio
n.
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.45
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.4
5 m
illio
nU
NFP
A, c
ore
USD
—0.
70 m
illio
n, m
ulti
-bi—
USD
1.0
0 m
illio
nU
NO
DC
, pro
ject
fun
ds—
USD
0.1
4 m
illio
n(s
har
e am
on
g th
e ta
sk in
3.1
, 3.2
, 3.3
).W
HO
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.40
mill
ion
Co
ord
inat
ion
and
pro
gra
mm
e m
od
alit
ies
The
UN
Th
eme
Gro
up o
n H
IV/A
IDS
will
co
ord
inat
e d
on
or a
ssis
tan
ce re
late
d to
HIV
/AID
S w
ith
the
par
tici
pat
ion
of th
e Re
pub
lican
AID
S C
entr
e an
d th
e ci
vil s
oci
e-ty
. Th
e Th
eme
Gro
up w
ill c
ont
inu
e to
pro
vid
e a
stru
ctur
e en
ablin
g va
rio
us a
gen
cies
to c
oo
rdin
ate
Un
ited
Nat
ions
sup
po
rt to
nat
ion
al re
spo
nse
to H
IV/A
IDS
and
sup
po
rt a
n ex
pan
ded
mul
ti-s
ecto
ral r
esp
ons
e to
the
epid
emic
thro
ug
h th
e G
lob
al F
und
Ag
ains
t AID
S, T
uber
culo
sis
and
Mal
aria
an
d th
e U
N R
C S
yste
m. T
he
Min
istr
y of
Hea
lth
will
co
ord
inat
e al
l hea
lth
mat
ters
.
23
Annexes
UN
DA
F R
ESU
LTS M
ATR
IX
Pri
ori
ty A
rea 4
: H
arm
on
iza
tion o
f N
ati
on
al
La
ws
an
d R
eg
ula
tion
s in
Acc
ord
an
ce w
ith I
nte
rna
tion
al
Con
ven
tion
sN
atio
nal
Pri
ori
ties
or
MD
Gs
Imp
lem
ent i
nter
nat
ion
al c
onv
enti
ons
the
coun
try
is s
ign
ato
ry to
; Int
egra
te th
e p
rin
cip
les
of s
usta
inab
le d
evel
op
men
t int
o co
untr
y p
olic
es a
nd
pro
gra
mm
es; r
ever
se th
e lo
ss o
f env
iro
nm
enta
l res
our
ces
and
pro
mot
e th
e ra
tio
nal
use
of
env
iro
nm
enta
l res
our
ces
bas
ed o
n p
rin
cip
les
of s
usta
inab
le d
evel
op
men
t.
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e
“By
2009
, do
mes
tic
law
s ar
e h
arm
on
ized
wit
h U
N le
gal
inst
rum
ents
, in
clu
din
g h
uman
rig
hts,
env
iro
nm
enta
l an
d re
fug
ee c
onv
enti
ons
, an
d th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
of th
e la
tter
are
imp
rove
d”.
Co
un
try
Ou
tco
me
Ro
le o
f par
tner
sR
eso
urc
e M
ob
ilis
atio
n
4.1.
Nat
ion
al le
gis
lati
on
is in
co
mp
lian
ce w
ith
sele
cted
inte
rnat
ion
al
conv
enti
ons
, in
clu
din
g h
uman
rig
hts
and
envi
ron
men
tal c
onv
enti
ons
an
d im
pro
ved
leg
al p
rote
ctio
n fo
r ref
ug
ees
(OH
CH
R, U
NIC
EF, U
NH
CR)
.
• U
NIC
EF, U
NH
CR
and
UN
Off
ice
Hig
h C
om
mis
sio
ner
for H
um
an R
igh
ts,
OH
CH
R R
egio
nal
Ad
vise
r of t
he
Reg
ion
al P
roje
ct fo
r Cen
tral
Asi
a—jo
int
and
co
llab
ora
tive
pro
gra
mm
ing
an
d a
dvi
sory
;•
Min
istr
ies
of I
nte
rio
r, Ju
stic
e, F
ore
ign
Aff
airs
, Sta
te B
ord
er a
nd
Cu
sto
ms
Co
mm
itte
es—
imp
lem
en
tati
on
, co
ord
inat
ion
an
d m
on
ito
rin
g;
• N
atio
nal
Hu
man
Rig
hts
Cen
tre,
Pro
cura
tor’
s O
ffic
e, O
mb
ud
sman
—co
ord
i-n
atio
n;
• C
ivil
soci
ety,
Am
eric
an B
ar A
sso
ciat
ion
—co
ord
inat
ion
an
d a
dvi
sory
.
OH
CH
R—to
be
det
erm
ined
.U
NIC
EF, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.3
4 m
illio
n, o
ther
—U
SD 0
.30
mill
ion
UN
HC
R, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.4
0 m
illio
n
4.2.
En
han
ced
leg
al fr
amew
ork
, mo
nit
ori
ng
and
sup
po
rt m
ech
anis
ms
are
in p
lace
for t
he
imp
lem
enta
tio
n of
UN
hum
an ri
ght
s in
stru
men
ts
(UN
DP,
OH
CH
R, U
NIC
EF, U
NH
CR
, UN
OD
C).
• U
ND
P, U
NIC
EF, U
NH
CR
, UN
OD
C a
nd
OH
CH
R R
egio
nal
Ad
vise
r of t
he
Reg
ion
al
Pro
ject
for C
entr
al A
sia—
coll
abo
rati
ve, j
oin
t p
rog
ram
min
g a
nd
ad
viso
ry;
• M
inis
try
of I
nte
rio
r, Ju
stic
e, F
ore
ign
Aff
airs
, Sta
te B
ord
er a
nd
Cu
sto
ms
Co
mm
itte
es, N
atio
nal
Hu
man
Rig
hts
Cen
tre,
Pro
cura
tor’
s O
ffic
e,
Om
bu
dsm
an, W
om
en’s
Co
mm
itte
e, r
egio
nal
an
d lo
cal a
uth
ori
ties
, Civ
il So
ciet
y O
rgan
izat
ion
s—co
ord
inat
ion
, im
ple
me
nta
tio
n a
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
;•
OSC
E, F
reed
om
Ho
use
, Am
eric
an B
ar A
sso
ciat
ion
, dip
lom
atic
mis
sio
ns—
co-
ord
inat
ion
, ad
voca
cy, f
un
din
g.
OH
CH
R—to
be
det
erm
ined
.U
ND
P, re
gul
ar—
USD
2.5
0 m
illio
n, o
ther
—U
SD 2
.00
mill
ion
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.17
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.3
8 m
illio
n
4.3.
Ob
ligat
ions
un
der
inte
rnat
ion
al e
nvir
on
men
tal c
onv
enti
ons
an
d ag
reem
ents
fulf
illed
thro
ug
h im
pro
ved
effe
ctiv
eess
of e
nvir
on
men
t m
anag
emen
t an
d d
evel
op
men
t of c
lean
en
erg
y so
urce
s (U
ND
P,
UN
IDO
).
• Th
e St
ate
Co
mm
itte
e fo
r Nat
ure
Pro
tect
ion
, Co
un
cil o
f Min
iste
rs o
f Rep
ub
lic
of K
arak
alp
akst
an, H
ydro
met
eoro
log
y A
dm
inis
trat
ion
, Mai
n F
ore
stry
D
epar
tmen
t u
nd
er t
he
Min
istr
y o
f Ag
ricu
ltu
re a
nd
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t, S
tate
B
io-C
on
tro
l Dep
artm
ent—
exe
cuti
on
, co
ord
inat
ion
, po
licy
dia
log
ue
and
re
gu
lati
on
ela
bo
rati
on
;•
Min
istr
ies
of H
ealt
h a
nd
Ag
ricu
ltu
re; A
cad
emia
—re
sear
ch a
nd
dat
a co
lle
c-ti
on
an
d a
nal
ysis
;•
Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank,
USA
ID, G
lob
al E
nvi
ron
men
tal F
acili
ty—
advo
cacy
, co
ord
inat
ion
, fu
nd
ing
.
UN
DP,
reg
ular
—U
SD 3
.30
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
6.0
0 m
illio
nU
NID
O N
atio
nal
Co
untr
y Pr
og
ram
me,
co
re—
USD
0.0
5 m
illio
nPO
Ps M
anag
emen
t—U
SD 0
.5 m
illio
n (G
EF),
oth
er—
USD
1.0
0 m
illio
n
Co
ord
inat
ion
and
pro
gra
mm
e m
od
alit
ies
The
coo
rdin
atio
n an
d p
rog
ram
me
mo
dal
itie
s to
pur
sue
this
UN
DA
F o
utco
me
will
sup
po
rt th
e G
over
nm
ent i
n m
eeti
ng
inte
rnat
ion
al c
om
mit
men
ts in
the
fiel
d of
hum
an ri
ght
s in
clu
din
g th
e ri
ght
s of
the
child
an
d re
fug
ees,
env
iro
nm
ent a
nd
sust
ain
able
dev
elo
pm
ent a
nd
inte
gra
tin
g th
em in
to n
atio
nal
dev
elo
pm
ent
po
licy
and
pla
nn
ing
. In
clos
e co
op
erat
ion
wit
h th
e G
lob
al E
nvir
on
men
tal F
acili
ty, U
ND
AF
will
als
o as
sist
the
Gov
ern
men
t an
d lo
cal c
om
mun
itie
s in
pre
serv
ing
bio
div
ersi
ty, p
rom
otin
g su
stai
nab
le la
nd
man
agem
ent a
nd
intr
od
uci
ng
new
tech
no
log
ies
for t
he
use
of re
new
able
en
erg
y. T
he
UN
Res
iden
t Co
ord
inat
or
Syst
em w
ill b
e th
e m
ain
coo
rdin
atio
n m
od
alit
y to
ens
ure
that
hum
an ri
ght
s co
nce
rns
are
add
ress
ed a
t int
erag
ency
leve
l, es
pec
ially
to s
upp
ort
the
Gov
ern
men
t in
the
fin
aliz
atio
n of
the
Nat
ion
al A
ctio
n Pl
an A
gai
nst T
ort
ure
and
inte
gra
te h
uman
rig
hts
con
cern
s in
to U
N p
rog
ram
min
g.
24
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
UN
DA
F R
ESU
LTS M
ATR
IX
Pri
ori
ty A
rea 5
: G
ood G
overn
an
ceN
atio
nal
Pri
ori
ties
or
MD
Gs
“Sp
are
no
effo
rt to
pro
mot
e d
emo
crac
y an
d st
ren
gth
en th
e ru
le o
f law
as
wel
l as
resp
ect f
or a
ll in
tern
atio
nal
ly re
cog
niz
ed h
uman
rig
hts
and
fun
dam
enta
l fre
edo
ms,
incl
ud
ing
the
rig
ht to
dev
elo
pm
ent”
(Mill
eniu
m D
ecla
rati
on)
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e
“Str
eng
then
ed G
over
nm
ent a
nd
civi
l so
ciet
y ca
pac
ity
and
par
tner
ship
tow
ard
s m
ore
eff
ecti
ve g
over
nan
ce”.
Co
un
try
Ou
tco
me
Ro
le o
f par
tner
sR
eso
urc
e M
ob
ilis
atio
n
5.1.
En
ablin
g en
viro
nm
ent f
or c
ivil
soci
ety
to p
arti
cip
ate
acti
vely
in d
e-ve
lop
men
t pro
cess
es (U
ND
P, U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, U
NH
CR
, WH
O, U
NA
IDS)
.•
UN
DP,
UN
ICEF
, UN
FPA
, WH
O, U
NH
CR
, UN
AID
S—jo
int
coll
abo
rati
ve p
ro-
gra
mm
ing
;•
Min
sitr
y o
f Ju
stic
e; N
atio
nal
Cen
tre
for H
um
an R
igh
ts, W
om
en’s
Co
mm
itte
e,
Law
En
forc
emen
t A
gen
cies
—ex
ecu
tio
n, c
oo
rdin
atio
n, i
mp
lem
en
tati
on
an
d c
oo
rdin
atio
n;
• R
egio
nal
an
d lo
cal a
uth
ori
ties
, Kas
hka
dar
ya, K
arak
alp
akst
an a
nd
Fer
gh
ana
Ho
kim
yats
, mah
alla
s, P
arlia
men
t C
om
mit
tees
—co
ord
inat
ion
;•
USA
ID, W
orl
d B
ank,
Eu
rop
ean
Co
mm
un
ity,
Mer
cy C
orp
s—te
chn
ical
ass
ist-
ance
an
d f
un
din
g;
• O
SCE,
Am
eric
an B
ar A
sso
ciat
ion
Cen
tral
Eu
rop
ean
Eu
rasi
an L
aw In
itia
tive
, Fr
eed
om
Ho
use
—co
ord
inat
ion
an
d a
dvi
sory
.
UN
DP,
reg
ular
—U
SD 2
.00
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
1.0
0 m
illio
nU
NIC
EF, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.3
8 m
illio
n, o
ther
—U
SD 0
.51
mill
ion
UN
FPA
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.10
mill
ion
UN
HC
R—U
SD 0
.25
mill
ion
WH
O, r
egul
ar—
USD
0.0
1 m
illio
n
5.2.
Nat
ion
al c
apac
itie
s to
resp
on
d to
em
erg
enci
es s
tren
gth
ened
(U
NIC
EF, U
NFP
A, U
ND
P, W
HO
, UN
HC
R).
• M
inis
try
for E
mer
gen
cy S
itu
atio
ns,
Sta
te C
ust
om
s C
om
mit
tee
and
Bo
rder
G
uar
ds,
Min
istr
y o
f In
teri
or—
exe
cuti
on
, mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d c
oo
rdin
atio
n;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k—te
chn
ical
ass
ista
nce
an
d f
un
din
g;
• N
GO
s—co
ord
inat
ion
, im
ple
me
nta
tio
n.
To b
e d
eter
min
ed.
5.3.
Gov
ern
ance
issu
es a
dd
ress
ed in
Gov
ern
men
t’s p
rio
rity
refo
rm p
ro-
gra
mm
es (U
NO
DC
, UN
HC
R, U
NIC
EF).
• U
NO
DC
, UN
ICEF
, UN
HC
R—
join
t co
llab
ora
tive
pro
gra
mm
ing
;•
Cab
inet
of M
inis
ters
, Oliy
Maj
lis, M
inis
try
of J
ust
ice,
Law
En
forc
emen
t A
gen
cies
—co
ord
inat
ion
an
d m
anag
em
en
t;•
Stat
e C
ust
om
s C
om
mit
tee
and
Bo
rder
Gu
ard
s, t
he
Off
ice
of t
he
Pro
secu
tor
Gen
eral
—im
ple
me
nta
tio
n a
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
(u
po
n in
stru
ctio
n f
rom
C
abin
et o
f Min
iste
rs);
• Lo
cal N
GO
s an
d c
ivil
soci
ety
org
aniz
atio
ns—
coll
abo
rati
ve im
ple
me
nta
-ti
on
of p
roje
cts
and
te
chn
ical
ass
ista
nce
;•
Euro
pea
n C
om
mu
nit
y, O
SCE,
Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank,
Wo
rld
Ban
k—te
ch-
nic
al a
ssis
tan
ce a
nd
fu
nd
ing
.
UN
OD
C—U
SD 3
.13
mill
ion
UN
ICEF
, reg
ular
—U
SD 0
.17
mill
ion
, oth
er—
USD
0.3
mill
ion
Co
ord
inat
ion
and
pro
gra
mm
e m
od
alit
ies
UN
DA
F w
ill fu
nct
ion
as a
cat
alys
t th
rou
gh
wh
ich
stre
ng
then
ed re
lati
ons
hip
s b
etw
een
Gov
ern
men
t an
d ci
vil s
oci
ety
as p
artn
ers
in d
evel
op
men
t may
be
ach
ieve
d. T
his
will
incl
ud
e co
ntin
ued
sup
po
rt a
nd
faci
litat
ion
of c
olla
bo
rati
ve n
etw
ork
s, p
rog
ram
mes
an
d p
roje
cts,
sup
po
rt fo
r pilo
t pro
ject
s an
d C
SO c
oal
i-ti
ons
at t
he
loca
l lev
el to
pro
mot
e m
ore
par
tici
pat
ory
an
d tr
ansp
aren
t pro
cess
es o
f gov
ern
ance
. Th
is U
ND
AF
out
com
e w
ill b
e p
ursu
ed th
rou
gh
thre
e lin
es o
f ac-
tio
n: a
) cap
acit
y b
uild
ing
of c
ivil
soci
ety
and
nat
ion
al a
uth
ori
ties
to d
evel
op
bet
ter s
kills
for a
nd
und
erst
and
ing
of ju
dic
ial a
nd
adm
inis
trat
ive
refo
rms;
b) a
war
e-n
ess
rais
ing
and
advo
cacy
on
the
nee
d fo
r dem
ocr
atic
refo
rms;
c) s
upp
ort
to th
e G
over
nm
ent f
or t
he
dev
elo
pm
ent o
f a le
gal
fram
ewo
rk fo
r civ
il so
ciet
y p
arti
ci-
pat
ion
. Th
e C
ont
ing
ency
Pla
nn
ing
Gro
up, c
om
pos
ed o
f UN
ag
enci
es a
nd
the
Fiel
d Se
curi
ty O
ffic
er, w
ill s
erve
as
the
mai
n co
ord
inat
ion
bo
dy
for c
ont
ing
ency
p
lan
nin
g an
d in
tera
gen
cy c
oo
rdin
atio
n w
ith
the
Min
istr
y of
Em
erg
ency
Sit
uati
ons
, Int
ern
atio
nal
Co
mm
itte
e of
the
Red
Cro
ss, U
S Em
bas
sy, U
SAID
an
d Sw
iss
Co
op
erat
ion
Ag
ency
an
d M
edic
ines
san
s Fr
ont
iers
.
25
Annexes
MO
NIT
OR
ING
AN
D E
VA
LU
ATIO
N P
LA
NP
riori
ty A
rea 1
: Im
pro
vem
en
t of
Liv
ing S
tan
da
rds
Nat
ion
al P
rio
riti
es o
r M
ille
nn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent G
oal
s“T
o en
han
ce li
vin
g st
and
ard
s an
d re
du
ce th
e p
rop
ort
ion
of th
e p
op
ulat
ion
cons
umin
g le
ss th
an 2
100
calo
ries
a d
ay fr
om
27.
5 p
erce
nt in
200
1 to
14
per
cent
in 2
015”
(Str
ateg
y fo
r Im
pro
vin
g of
the
Livi
ng
Stan
dar
ds
of th
e Pe
op
le o
f U
zbek
ista
n).
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e b
y th
e En
d o
f th
e P
rog
ram
me
Cyc
le“S
tren
gth
ened
nat
ion
al a
nd
loca
l lev
el c
apac
ity
to d
evel
op
, im
ple
men
t an
d m
on
ito
r str
ateg
ies
for i
mp
rovi
ng
livin
g st
and
ard
s”.
Co
un
try
Pro
gra
mm
e O
utc
om
eIn
dic
ato
rs a
nd
Bas
elin
esP
artn
ers
Res
po
nsi
ble
an
d V
erif
icat
ion
Mea
ns
Ris
ks
and
Ass
um
pti
on
s1.
1. S
usta
inab
le h
uman
dev
elo
pm
ent
po
licie
s to
imp
rove
live
liho
od
s an
d ac
cess
to s
oci
al s
ervi
ces
by
the
po
or
dev
elo
ped
an
d th
eir i
mp
lem
enta
tio
n is
mo
nit
ore
d in
acc
ord
ance
wit
h M
DG
s.
UN
DP
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• N
atio
nal
str
ateg
y fo
r im
pro
vin
g li
vin
g s
tan
dar
ds
lau
nch
ed
wit
h c
lear
nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al t
arg
ets
for p
ove
rty
red
uc-
tio
n a
nd
ach
ieve
men
t o
f MD
Gs.
Base
line:
Gov
ernm
ent a
ckno
wle
dges
nee
d fo
r mac
ro-e
cono
mic
an
d in
stit
utio
nal r
efor
m to
inte
grat
e po
vert
y an
d em
ploy
men
t an
d cr
eate
an
Inte
r-ag
ency
Com
mit
tee
to c
oord
inat
e th
e el
abor
a-ti
on o
f the
Str
ateg
y fo
r im
prov
ing
livin
g st
anda
rds.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• Th
e n
um
ber
of d
istr
icts
th
at h
ave
dev
elo
ped
an
d im
ple
-m
ente
d lo
cal p
lan
s o
n in
ter-
sect
ora
l so
cial
ser
vice
s fo
r vu
l-n
erab
le c
hild
ren
;•
Perc
ent
of f
un
ds
allo
cate
d in
so
cial
sec
tor i
n s
elec
ted
geo
-g
rap
hic
are
as;
Base
line:
Stu
dy o
n So
cial
Exp
endi
ture
.U
NFP
A o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
Nu
mb
er o
f nat
ion
al p
olic
ies
and
str
ateg
ies
on
po
vert
y re
-d
uct
ion
an
d d
evel
op
men
t th
at in
teg
rate
po
pu
lati
on
fact
ors
in
to s
oci
al p
olic
y p
lan
nin
g a
nd
imp
lem
enta
tio
n.
Base
line:
Sur
vey
to b
e un
dert
aken
• M
inis
try
of E
con
om
y—o
vera
ll co
ord
inat
ion
, po
licy;
• St
ate
Stat
isti
cs C
om
mit
tee,
lin
e m
inis
trie
s, lo
cal a
uth
ori
ties
in
Kar
akal
pak
stan
, Kas
hak
dar
ya a
nd
Fer
gh
ana,
pri
vate
sec
-to
r—b
enef
icia
ries
;•
Mas
s m
edia
—o
utr
each
;•
Wo
men
’s C
om
mit
tee—
po
licy
and
ad
voca
cy;
• Eu
rop
ean
Co
mm
un
ity—
fun
din
g a
nd
ad
voca
cy;
• W
orl
d B
ank
and
Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank—
po
licy
dia
log
ue,
ad
voca
cy a
nd
co
ord
inat
ion
;•
Cen
tre
for E
con
om
ic R
esea
rch
—re
sear
ch a
nd
po
licy
anal
y-si
s.
1.
Co
nti
nu
ed c
om
mit
men
t b
y th
e G
ove
rnm
ent
and
key
do
-n
ors
in p
ro-p
oo
r po
lices
to
imp
rove
livi
ng
sta
nd
ard
s es
pe
-ci
ally
at
loca
l lev
el;
2.
Suff
icie
nt
loca
l exp
end
itu
res
for s
oci
al s
ecto
r;3.
W
illin
gn
ess
and
ava
ilab
ility
of s
enio
r an
d m
idd
le le
vel o
ffi-
cial
s to
par
tici
pat
e in
ski
lls t
rain
ing
;4.
D
ata
dis
agg
reg
ated
by
gen
der
, ru
ral/
urb
an r
esid
ence
an
d
oth
er p
aram
eter
s ar
e n
ot
alw
ays
avai
lab
le a
nd
def
init
ion
s o
f in
dic
ato
rs n
ot
alw
ays
in li
ne
wit
h in
t’l s
tan
dar
ds;
5.
Eco
no
mic
co
nst
rain
ts m
ay r
esu
lt in
red
uct
ion
in s
oci
al s
ec-
tor s
pen
din
g;
6.
Cap
acit
y b
uild
ing
of p
rofe
ssio
nal
s an
d o
ffic
ials
may
no
t tr
ansl
ate
in b
enef
its
for p
oo
r un
less
bac
ked
up
by
pro
-po
or
po
licie
s;7.
So
cial
an
d e
con
om
ic in
dic
ato
rs im
pro
ve m
ore
rap
idly
for
the
po
or t
han
for t
he
rest
of t
he
soci
ety
1.2.
Po
or a
nd
vuln
erab
le p
eop
le’s
ac-
cess
to q
ualit
y co
mm
unit
y b
ased
so
-ci
al s
ervi
ces
imp
rove
d an
d n
ew s
our
c-es
of i
nco
me
crea
ted
.
UN
DP
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• In
crea
se in
nu
mb
er o
f jo
bs
loca
lly a
nd
nat
ion
ally
.Ba
selin
e: g
row
ing
disp
ariti
es in
acc
ess t
o ba
sic
serv
ices
and
live
li-ho
od.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• Pe
rcen
t o
f vu
lner
able
ch
ildre
n in
th
e co
mm
un
ity
rece
ivin
g
soci
al s
ervi
ces
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
;•
Perc
ent
of p
re-s
cho
ol a
ge
child
ren
par
tici
pat
ing
in M
ahal
la
kin
der
gar
ten
s in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of s
oci
ally
un
der
pri
vile
ged
ch
ildre
n in
clu
ded
into
th
e m
ain
stre
am e
du
cati
on
sys
tem
(pre
-sch
oo
l an
d s
cho
ol)
in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of c
hild
ren
wh
o h
ave
eith
er b
een
pre
ven
ted
fro
m
bei
ng
pla
ced
in in
stit
uti
on
s o
r giv
en fo
r fo
ster
car
e o
r ad
op
-ti
on
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
.
• M
inis
try
of L
abo
ur a
nd
So
cial
Pro
tect
ion
, In
tern
atio
nal
La
bo
ur O
rgan
izat
ion
an
d M
inis
try
of E
con
om
y, lo
cal a
uth
ori
-ti
es in
Kar
akal
pak
stan
, Kas
hka
dar
ya a
nd
Fer
gh
ana—
coo
rdi-
nat
ion
, cap
acit
y-b
uild
ing
;•
Civ
il So
ciet
y O
rgan
izat
ion
s—aw
aren
ess,
cap
acit
y–b
uild
ing
, co
mm
un
ity–
mo
bili
zati
on
;•
Euro
pea
n C
om
mu
nit
y—fu
nd
ing
an
d a
dvo
cacy
;•
USA
ID, A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k—co
ord
inat
ion
, po
licy.
• M
DG
rep
ort
s, U
NIC
EF M
ult
i In
dic
ato
r Clu
ster
Su
rvey
, go
vern
-m
ent
po
vert
y st
rate
gy
rep
ort
s, S
mal
l an
d M
ediu
m
Ente
rpri
se D
evel
op
men
t Pr
oje
ct (A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k),
Wo
rld
Ban
k’s
Livi
ng
Sta
nd
ard
s A
sses
smen
t, C
ou
ntr
y Ec
on
om
ic M
emo
ran
du
m, a
nd
Co
un
try
Ass
ista
nce
Str
ateg
y.
1.
Part
icip
atio
n o
f co
mm
un
itie
s;2.
A
dd
ress
gen
der
issu
es in
po
vert
y re
du
ctio
n a
nd
wo
men
em
plo
ymen
t (d
iffe
ren
ces
in t
erm
s o
f sex
, em
plo
ymen
t, li
v-in
g s
tan
dar
ds
and
acc
ess
to b
anki
ng
res
ou
rces
);3.
C
apac
ity
bu
ildin
g o
f pro
fess
ion
als
and
off
icia
ls m
ay n
ot
tran
slat
e in
to b
enef
its
for c
om
mu
nit
ies
un
less
bac
ked
up
b
y d
irec
t in
terv
enti
on
s b
y G
ove
rnm
ent
and
civ
il so
ciet
y;4.
Ex
isti
ng
so
cial
infr
astr
uct
ure
is in
stit
uti
on
al r
ath
er t
han
co
mm
un
ity
bas
ed.
1.3.
Pro
du
ctiv
ity
and
com
pet
itiv
enes
s of
the
agro
-pro
cess
ing
ind
ustr
y se
c-to
r en
han
ced
.
• M
inis
try
of E
con
om
y, S
tate
Sta
tist
ic C
om
mit
tee,
th
e Pr
ivat
izat
ion
Co
mm
itte
e, A
gen
cy fo
r Ext
ern
al E
con
om
ic
Rel
atio
ns,
ass
oci
atio
ns
and
ho
ldin
gs—
cove
rin
g s
pec
ific
sec
-to
rs fo
r dat
a ve
rifi
cati
on
, up
dat
e an
d m
on
ito
rin
g.
• Pa
rtn
erin
g a
rran
gem
ents
wit
h t
he
Uzb
eken
gils
ano
at (e
qu
iv-
alen
t o
f Min
istr
y o
f In
du
stry
), M
inis
try
of A
gri
cult
ure
an
d
Ass
oci
atio
n o
f Bu
sin
ess
Incu
bat
ors
.
Man
y as
soci
atio
ns fu
nct
ion
at a
ver
y ce
ntra
l lev
el, c
ont
rolli
ng
thei
r ow
n en
terp
rise
s, ra
ther
then
the
sect
or.
Man
y em
erg
ing
ente
rpri
ses,
par
ticu
larl
y SM
Es, e
spec
ially
in ru
ral a
reas
are
not
co
vere
d b
y th
ese
arti
fici
al a
sso
ciat
ions
of p
rod
uce
rs o
r tra
der
s.
26
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
MO
NIT
OR
ING
AN
D E
VA
LU
ATIO
N P
LA
NP
riori
ty A
rea 2
: A
ccess
to Q
ua
lity
Ba
sic
Serv
ices—
Ed
uca
tion
Nat
ion
al P
rio
riti
es o
r M
ille
nn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent G
oal
s“E
nsur
e th
at a
ll ch
ildre
n, b
oys
and
gir
ls, c
om
ple
te 9
th g
rad
e of
a q
ualit
y ed
uca
tio
n” (S
trat
egy
for t
he
Imp
rove
men
t of t
he
Livi
ng
Stan
dar
ds
of th
e Pe
op
le o
f Uzb
ekis
tan
and
Nat
ion
al P
rog
ram
me
for P
erso
nn
el T
rain
ing
).
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e b
y th
e En
d o
f th
e P
rog
ram
me
Cyc
le“B
y 20
09, i
mp
rove
d q
ualit
y of
bas
ic e
du
cati
on
is a
chie
ved
”
Co
un
try
Pro
gra
mm
e O
utc
om
eIn
dic
ato
rs a
nd
Bas
elin
esP
artn
ers
Res
po
nsi
ble
an
d V
erif
icat
ion
Mea
ns
Ris
ks
and
Ass
um
pti
on
s2.
1. L
earn
ing
envi
ron
men
t fo
r bas
ic
edu
cati
on
pro
mot
ing
gen
der
eq
uali-
ty, n
eed
s-b
ased
an
d lif
e sk
ills
edu
ca-
tio
n is
intr
od
uce
d an
d im
ple
men
ted
in s
elec
ted
area
s.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• N
um
ber
of s
cho
ols
imp
lem
enti
ng
th
e lif
e sk
ills
edu
cati
on
cu
rric
ulu
m in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of s
cho
ols
su
cces
sfu
lly im
ple
men
tin
g G
lob
al
Edu
cati
on
cu
rric
ulu
m in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of s
cho
ols
wit
h a
pp
rop
riat
e w
ater
an
d h
ygie
ne
fa-
cilit
ies
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
.Ba
selin
e: S
tudy
on
gend
er re
view
in e
duca
tion
to b
e un
dert
aken
.U
NA
IDS
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• Pe
rcen
t o
f sch
oo
ls w
ith
tea
cher
s w
ho
hav
e b
een
tra
ined
in
life
skill
s b
ased
HIV
/AID
S ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
wh
o t
aug
ht
it d
ur-
ing
th
e la
st a
cad
emic
yea
r;•
Perc
ent o
f yo
un
g p
eop
le a
ged
15–
24 w
ho
bo
th c
orr
ectl
y id
en-
tify
way
s o
f pre
ven
tin
g th
e se
xual
tran
smis
sio
n o
f HIV
an
d w
ho
re
ject
maj
or m
isco
nce
pti
on
s ab
ou
t HIV
tran
smis
sio
n.
Base
line:
46%
(per
cent
of y
oung
peo
ple
corr
ectl
y id
enti
fyin
g w
ays
and
reje
ctin
g m
isco
ncep
tion
s, 2
001
for C
entr
al A
sia)
.
• C
abin
et o
f Min
iste
rs, M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic E
du
cati
on
, R
epu
blic
an C
entr
e o
f Pri
mar
y Ed
uca
tio
n, S
cien
tifi
c R
esea
rch
In
stit
ute
of P
edag
og
ical
Sci
ence
s, U
SAID
, Wo
rld
Ban
k, A
sian
D
evel
op
men
t B
ank,
an
d U
NES
CO
;•
Stat
isti
cs D
ivis
ion
Mill
enn
ium
Ind
icat
ors
(UN
DES
A) a
nd
N
atio
nal
Mill
enn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Go
als
Rep
ort
s, U
ND
P N
atio
nal
Hu
man
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Rep
ort
s, C
om
mo
n C
ou
ntr
y A
sses
smen
t, U
NIC
EF M
ult
i In
dic
ato
r Clu
ster
Su
rvey
, UN
ICEF
M
id-t
erm
Rev
iew
s, U
N p
rog
ram
me
and
pro
ject
clu
ster
eva
l-u
atio
ns;
• M
on
ito
rin
g o
f Nat
ion
al R
efo
rm P
roce
ss, A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k “T
ext
Bo
oks
Dev
elo
pm
ent”
an
d “
Wo
man
an
d C
hild
H
ealt
h D
evel
op
men
t” p
roje
cts
rep
ort
s, U
SAID
Dem
og
rap
hic
H
ealt
h S
urv
ey (1
996
) an
d H
ealt
h E
xam
inat
ion
Su
rvey
(20
02).
1.
Lim
ited
loca
l cap
acit
y in
pro
ject
pla
nn
ing
an
d m
on
ito
rin
g;
2.
Lim
ited
invo
lvem
ent
of c
om
mu
nit
ies
and
loca
l au
tho
riti
es;
3.
Lack
of r
eso
urc
es fo
r pri
nti
ng
/pu
blis
hin
g o
f man
ual
s an
d
trai
nin
g m
ater
ial.
2.2.
Acc
ess
to b
asic
ed
uca
tio
n fo
r ch
il-d
ren
wit
h (p
hysi
cal a
nd
men
tal i
m-
pai
rmen
ts a
nd
lan
gua
ge
dif
ficu
ltie
s)
is im
pro
ved
in s
elec
ted
area
s.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• N
um
ber
of c
hild
ren
wit
h d
isab
iliti
es h
ave
bee
n in
teg
rate
d in
b
asic
ed
uca
tio
n in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of f
amili
es u
sin
g a
pp
rop
riat
e fa
mily
car
e p
ract
ices
fo
r ch
ildre
n w
ith
sp
ecia
l nee
ds
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
.Ba
selin
e: 6
6,64
7 fa
mili
es (M
inis
try
of P
ublic
Edu
cati
on);
Chi
ldre
n D
isab
ility
stu
dy to
be
unde
rtak
en.
UN
HC
R o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
All
refu
gee
ch
ildre
n e
ligib
le t
o jo
in r
egu
lar s
cho
ols
are
en
-ro
lled
in lo
cal s
cho
ols
;•
Wit
h t
he
catc
h u
p c
lass
es p
rovi
ded
by
UN
HC
R an
d im
ple
-m
enti
ng
par
tner
s, a
ll re
fug
ee c
hild
ren
are
ab
le t
o s
tud
y in
th
e o
ffic
ial l
ang
uag
es o
f th
e co
un
try.
WH
O o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
r•
Hea
lth
Pro
mo
tio
n is
inco
rpo
rate
d in
to c
urr
icu
la o
f at
leas
t al
l p
ilot
sch
oo
ls in
eac
h r
egio
n, u
sin
g a
dap
ted
WH
O t
rain
ing
p
acka
ge.
Base
line:
6 re
gion
s out
of 1
4 in
volv
ed.
• M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic E
du
cati
on
, Sta
te S
tati
stic
Co
mm
itte
e,
Min
istr
y o
f Fin
ance
, Min
istr
y o
f Lab
ou
r an
d S
oci
al
Pro
tect
ion
, mah
alla
s an
d lo
cal h
oki
mya
ts’ r
eco
rds—
com
mu
-n
ity
surv
eys
and
qu
alit
ativ
e an
alys
is;
• U
NIC
EF M
id T
erm
Rev
iew
, UN
ICEF
an
d U
NES
CO
—p
ro-
gra
mm
e an
d p
roje
ct c
lust
er e
valu
atio
ns.
1.
Lim
ited
loca
l cap
acit
ies
and
faci
lity
for e
arly
iden
tifi
cati
on
an
d in
terv
enti
on
;2.
La
ck o
f dat
a o
n d
iffe
ren
t ca
teg
ori
es o
f ch
ildre
n;
3.
Lack
of v
isib
le c
om
mu
nit
y b
ased
alt
ern
ativ
es;
4.
Lim
ited
eff
ecti
ven
ess
for t
rain
ing
pro
gra
mm
es (i
nsu
ffic
ien
t n
um
ber
of t
rain
ers
at lo
cal l
evel
);5.
La
ck o
f res
ou
rces
for t
rain
ing
mat
eria
l;6.
Li
mit
ed in
volv
emen
t o
f co
mm
un
itie
s;7.
St
igm
a.
2.3.
Fam
ilies
’ ch
ild-b
eari
ng
pra
ctic
es
for c
hild
sur
viva
l, d
evel
op
men
t an
d p
rote
ctio
n ar
e im
pro
ved
in s
elec
ted
area
s.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• Pe
rcen
t o
f fam
ilies
th
at e
mp
loy
app
rop
riat
e ch
ild r
eari
ng
p
ract
ices
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
.Ba
selin
e: C
hild
Rea
ring
Stu
dy.
• M
inis
try
of H
ealt
h, M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic E
du
cati
on
, mah
alla
co
mm
itte
es a
nd
ho
kim
yats
—co
mm
un
ity
surv
eys
and
qu
ali-
tati
ve a
nal
ysis
;•
UN
ICEF
Mid
Ter
m R
evie
w, U
NIC
EF M
ult
i In
dic
ato
r Clu
ster
Su
rvey
, UN
pro
gra
mm
e an
d p
roje
ct c
lust
er e
valu
atio
ns
and
fi
eld
vis
its;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k “W
om
an a
nd
Ch
ild H
ealt
h
Dev
elo
pm
ent”
pro
ject
.
1.
Ch
ang
ing
fam
ily s
tru
ctu
res
and
eco
no
mic
pre
ssu
re c
reat
e ad
vers
e en
viro
nm
ent
for c
hild
ren
;2.
M
ore
fun
din
g fo
r Ear
ly C
hild
ho
od
Dev
elo
pm
ent p
rog
ram
mes
;3.
In
tera
ctiv
e an
d d
emon
stra
tive
mat
eria
l pro
duc
tion
sup
por
ted
;4.
G
end
er s
tere
oty
pin
g a
nd
lack
of f
ocu
s o
n in
tera
ctio
n in
cu
rric
ulu
m;
5.
Mo
re N
GO
invo
lvem
ent;
6.
Effo
rts
in M
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
Eva
luat
ion
.
27
Annexes
MO
NIT
OR
ING
AN
D E
VA
LU
ATIO
N P
LA
NP
riori
ty A
rea 3
: A
ccess
to Q
ua
lity
Ba
sic
Serv
ices—
Hea
lth
Nat
ion
al P
rio
riti
es o
r M
ille
nn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent G
oal
s“R
edu
ce In
fant
Mo
rtal
ity
by
2/3
by
2015
”, “D
ecre
ase
Mat
ern
al M
ort
alit
y b
y 1/
3 b
y 20
15”,
“Hal
t an
d Re
vers
e th
e Ri
sin
g Tr
end
in H
IV-A
IDS
Prev
alen
ce R
ate
by
2015
”. N
atio
nal
Tar
get
s an
d Sh
ort
an
d M
id T
erm
Go
als
of th
e N
atio
nal
Pr
og
ram
me
on
Red
uct
ion
of In
fant
an
d C
hild
Mo
rtal
ity
and
Stra
teg
ic P
rog
ram
me
on
Co
unte
ract
ion
to H
IV/A
IDS
Epid
emic
in th
e Re
pub
lic o
f Uzb
ekis
tan
.U
ND
AF
Ou
tco
me
by
the
End
of t
he
Pro
gra
mm
e C
ycle
“By
2009
, eq
uita
ble
acc
ess
to q
ualit
y p
rim
ary
hea
lth
care
ser
vice
s is
imp
rove
d”.
Co
un
try
Pro
gra
mm
e O
utc
om
eIn
dic
ato
rs a
nd
Bas
elin
esP
artn
ers
Res
po
nsi
ble
an
d V
erif
icat
ion
Mea
ns
Ris
ks
and
Ass
um
pti
on
s3.
1. Im
pro
ved
nat
ion
al p
olic
y en
viro
n-
men
t fo
r bet
ter h
ealt
h.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• Th
e W
HO
Liv
e B
irth
def
init
ion
is a
do
pte
d a
nd
intr
od
uce
d
cou
ntr
y-w
ide
;•
Leg
isla
tio
n o
n P
eop
le L
ivin
g w
ith
HIV
/AID
S is
co
mp
lian
t w
ith
in
tern
atio
nal
sta
nd
ard
s;•
Inte
rnat
ion
al s
tan
dar
ds
for Y
ou
th F
rien
dly
Ser
vice
s ad
op
ted
an
d im
ple
men
ted
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
;•
Safe
inje
ctio
n p
olic
y ad
op
ted
an
d e
nfo
rced
;•
Law
s o
n U
niv
ersa
l Sal
t Io
diz
atio
n a
nd
Flo
ur F
ort
ific
atio
n
wit
h Ir
on
are
ad
op
ted
an
d e
nfo
rced
.Ba
selin
e: 5
7% u
se io
dize
d sa
lt (s
alt t
estin
g ca
mpa
ign
in sc
hool
s);
Salt
Situ
atio
n A
naly
sis t
o be
und
erta
ken.
UN
FPA
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• N
um
ber
of k
ey p
olic
y/d
ecis
ion
mak
ers,
co
mm
un
ity
and
rel
i-g
iou
s le
ader
s su
pp
ort
ing
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f pro
gra
mm
es in
lin
e w
ith
Inte
rnat
ion
al C
on
fere
nce
on
Po
pu
lati
on
an
d
Dev
elo
pm
ent;
Co
nve
nti
on
on
Elim
anat
ion
of D
iscr
iman
atio
n
Ag
ain
st W
om
en (U
NFP
A).
Base
line:
Kno
wle
dge,
Att
itude
and
Pra
ctic
e su
rvey
s to
be c
ondu
cted
.W
HO
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• N
um
ber
of n
atio
nal
po
licy
do
cum
ents
an
d le
gis
lati
ve in
stru
-m
ents
in in
div
idu
al p
rio
rity
are
as d
evel
op
ed o
r rev
ised
in
line
wit
h in
tern
atio
nal
sta
nd
ard
s an
d e
xper
ien
ce;
• N
um
ber
of p
rio
rity
are
as fo
r wh
ich
imp
lem
enta
tio
n h
as
star
ted
.U
NO
DC
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• D
ecre
ase
in d
rug
cons
um
pti
on
amo
ng
the
gen
eral
po
pu
lati
on
;•
Dec
reas
e in
dru
g c
on
sum
pti
on
am
on
g th
e yo
uth
po
pu
lati
on
;•
Dec
reas
e o
f hig
h-r
isk
dru
g a
bu
se;
• In
crea
sed
ser
vice
uti
lizat
ion
for d
rug
pro
ble
ms;
• D
ecre
ase
in d
rug
-rel
ated
mo
rbid
ity;
• D
ecre
ase
in d
rug
rel
ated
mo
rtal
ity.
Base
line:
25,
012—
offic
ially
regi
ster
ed d
rug
user
s (20
02);
65,0
00–
91,0
00—
esti
mat
ed p
robl
em d
rug
user
s (20
00);
3,02
8—nu
mbe
r of
trea
ted
drug
use
rs (2
002)
.U
NH
CR
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• R
efu
gee
mo
rtal
ity
rate
rem
ain
s ze
ro;
• A
ll re
fug
ees
hav
e fr
ee a
cces
s to
bas
ic m
edic
al fa
cilit
ies
thro
ug
h
UN
HC
R’s
imp
lem
enti
ng
par
tner
s an
d lo
cal m
edic
al c
are;
• R
efu
gee
s h
ave
incr
ease
d a
war
enes
s o
f rep
rod
uct
ive
hea
lth
is
sues
an
d A
IDS
thro
ug
h lo
cal p
rog
ram
mes
co
ord
inat
ed
wit
h o
ther
UN
ag
enci
es (W
HO
an
d U
NFP
A).
• St
ate
Stat
isti
cs C
om
mit
tee,
Min
istr
y o
f Hea
lth
an
d r
esea
rch
in
stit
uti
on
s, U
SAID
Pro
ject
Ho
pe,
Wo
men
’s C
om
mit
tee,
M
ahal
la F
un
d, M
inis
try
of E
con
om
y;•
UN
ICEF
/UN
FPA
Mid
ter
m r
evie
w, U
NIC
EF S
tate
of t
he
Wo
rld
C
hild
ren
, Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank
“Wo
man
an
d C
hild
H
ealt
h D
evel
op
men
t” p
roje
ct, W
orl
d B
ank
“Hea
lth
I” a
nd
“H
ealt
h II
” p
roje
cts,
Mill
enn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Go
als
Rep
ort
s, W
HO
Hea
lth
for A
ll R
egio
nal
Dat
abas
e, U
NIC
EF
Mu
lti I
nd
icat
or C
lust
er S
urv
ey, U
N c
lust
er p
roje
ct a
nd
sel
ect-
ed g
eog
rap
hic
clu
ster
eva
luat
ion
s, F
ield
vis
its,
Kn
ow
led
ge,
A
ttit
ud
e an
d P
ract
ice
surv
eys,
Sta
tist
ics
Div
isio
n M
illen
niu
m
Ind
icat
ors
(UN
DES
A).
1.
Co
nti
nu
ed c
om
mit
men
t b
y th
e G
ove
rnm
ent
and
key
do
no
r in
pro
-po
or p
olic
es t
o im
pro
ve li
vin
g s
tan
dar
ds
esp
ecia
lly
at lo
cal l
evel
;2.
Su
ffic
ien
t lo
cal e
xpen
dit
ure
s fo
r so
cial
sec
tor;
3.
Will
ing
nes
s an
d a
vaila
bili
ty o
f sen
ior a
nd
mid
dle
leve
l off
i-ci
als
to p
arti
cip
ate
in s
kills
tra
inin
g;
4.
Dat
a d
isag
gre
gat
ed b
y g
end
er, r
ura
l/u
rban
res
iden
ce a
nd
o
ther
par
amet
ers
are
no
t al
way
s av
aila
ble
an
d d
efin
itio
ns
of i
nd
icat
ors
no
t al
way
s in
lin
e w
ith
int’
l sta
nd
ard
s;5.
Ec
on
om
ic c
on
stra
ints
may
res
ult
in r
edu
ctio
n in
so
cial
sec
-to
r sp
end
ing
;6.
C
apac
ity
bu
ildin
g o
f pro
fess
ion
als
and
off
icia
ls m
ay n
ot
tran
slat
e in
ben
efit
s fo
r po
or u
nle
ss b
acke
d u
p b
y p
ro-p
oo
r p
olic
ies;
7.
Soci
al a
nd
eco
no
mic
ind
icat
ors
imp
rove
mo
re r
apid
ly fo
r th
e p
oo
r th
an fo
r th
e re
st o
f th
e so
ciet
y.
28
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
Co
un
try
Pro
gra
mm
e O
utc
om
eIn
dic
ato
rs a
nd
Bas
elin
esP
artn
ers
Res
po
nsi
ble
an
d V
erif
icat
ion
Mea
ns
Ris
ks
and
Ass
um
pti
on
s3.
2. T
he
qu
alit
y o
f ser
vice
s fo
r M
ater
nal
an
d C
hild
Hea
lth
, co
mm
un
i-ca
ble
dis
ease
s, n
utr
itio
n, y
ou
ng
peo
-p
le’s
an
d r
epro
du
ctiv
e h
ealt
h in
se
-le
cted
pro
vin
ces
is im
pro
ved
.
UN
ICE
F o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
A c
om
pre
hen
sive
Mat
ern
al a
nd
Ch
ild H
ealt
h c
are
pac
kag
e fo
r pri
mar
y h
ealt
h c
are
leve
l is
dev
elo
ped
an
d im
ple
men
ted
in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of h
ou
seh
old
s co
nsu
min
g io
diz
ed s
alt
and
iro
n-f
or-
tifi
ed f
lou
r;•
Nu
mb
er o
f sch
oo
ls im
ple
men
tin
g li
fe s
kills
bas
ed e
du
cati
on
;�
Nu
mb
er o
f Yo
uth
Fri
end
ly S
ervi
ces
wit
h in
tern
atio
nal
sta
nd
-ar
ds
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
;Ba
selin
e: 1
9%
con
sum
ptio
n of
iodi
zed
salt
(MIC
S 20
00);
IMR
cau
-sa
lity
stud
y; Y
outh
Fri
endl
y Se
rvic
es M
app
ing
rep
ort.
UN
FPA
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• N
um
ber
of s
ervi
ce p
oin
ts p
rovi
din
g y
ou
th fr
ien
dly
rep
rod
uc-
tive
hea
lth
ser
vice
s;•
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f In
tra
Ute
rin
e D
evic
e u
sers
in o
vera
ll co
ntr
acep
-ti
ve p
reva
len
ce;
• N
um
ber
of c
ervi
cal c
ance
r scr
een
ing
s u
nd
erta
ken
in a
cco
rd-
ance
wit
h im
pro
ved
sta
nd
ard
s.Ba
selin
e: K
now
ledg
e, A
ttitu
de a
nd P
ract
ice
surv
eys t
o be
con
duct
ed.
WH
O o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
Perc
ent
of p
op
ula
tio
n h
avin
g a
cces
s to
dir
ectl
y o
bse
rved
tr
eatm
ent
sho
rt c
ou
rse
;•
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f tu
ber
culo
sis
case
s d
etec
ted
an
d c
ure
d u
nd
er
dir
ectl
y o
bse
rved
tre
atm
ent
sho
rt c
ou
rse
;•
Un
der
fiv
e m
ort
alit
y ra
te;
• In
fan
t m
ort
alit
y ra
te;
• Pr
opor
tion
of o
ne
year
old
chi
ldre
n im
mun
ized
ag
ains
t mea
sles
;•
Mat
ern
al m
ort
alit
y ra
tio
.Ba
selin
e: U
5 M
R—23
.1 (2
002)
; IM
R—16
.3 (2
002)
; Mea
sles
imm
uni-
zati
on—
96.8
(200
2); M
MR—
33.1
(200
0).
• St
ate
Stat
isti
c C
om
mit
tee,
Wo
rld
Ban
k, U
NIC
EF, W
HO
, U
NFP
A, U
SAID
, Min
istr
y o
f Hea
lth
an
d p
rog
ram
mes
invo
lv-
ing
NG
Os,
Sta
tist
ics
Div
isio
n M
illen
niu
m In
dic
ato
rs
(UN
DES
A);
• M
illen
niu
m D
evel
op
men
t G
oal
s R
epo
rts,
USA
ID
Dem
og
rap
hic
Hea
lth
Su
rvey
, UN
ICEF
Mu
lti I
nd
icat
or C
lust
er
Surv
ey, W
orl
d B
ank
Livi
ng
Sta
nd
ard
s A
sses
smen
t, L
ivin
g
Stan
dar
ds
Stra
teg
y St
rate
gy
(Asi
an D
evel
op
men
t B
ank,
W
orl
d B
ank
and
oth
ers)
, Wo
rld
Ban
k’s
“Hea
lth
II”
pro
ject
(w
ith
its
com
po
nen
t o
n P
rim
ary
Hea
lth
Car
e) a
nd
gra
nt
for
“Cen
tral
Asi
an A
IDS
Pro
ject
Pre
par
atio
n”,
Asi
an
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k “W
om
an a
nd
Ch
ild H
ealt
h
Dev
elo
pm
ent”
pro
ject
, fie
ld r
epo
rts,
UN
pro
gra
mm
e an
d
pro
ject
clu
ster
eva
luat
ion
s an
d s
ervi
ce s
tati
stic
s.
1.
Co
nti
nu
ed im
ple
men
tati
on
of t
he
Hea
lth
Ref
orm
Pr
og
ram
me
;2.
B
ud
get
ary
allo
cati
on
for h
ealt
h in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
p
rovi
nce
s w
ill n
ot
dec
reas
e;
3.
Min
imu
m s
taff
tu
rn o
ver i
ncl
ud
ing
tra
ined
per
son
nel
;4.
C
on
tin
ued
su
pp
ort
of k
ey e
xter
nal
do
no
rs in
hea
lth
.
3.3.
Incr
ease
d u
tiliz
atio
n o
f pri
mar
y h
ealt
h c
are
serv
ices
an
d im
pro
ved
h
ealt
h-s
eeki
ng
beh
avio
r am
on
g m
en,
wo
men
an
d y
ou
ng
peo
ple
in s
elec
ted
ar
eas.
UN
ICE
F o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
Perc
enta
ge
of f
amili
es a
pp
rop
riat
ely
uti
lizin
g p
rim
ary
hea
lth
ca
re s
ervi
ces
in s
elec
ted
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
;•
Nu
mb
er o
f yo
un
g p
eop
le w
ho
hav
e su
ffic
ien
t kn
ow
led
ge
on
H
IV/A
IVS
pre
ven
tio
n;
• N
umb
er o
f you
ng p
eop
le w
ho h
ave
rece
ived
vol
unta
ry H
IV/A
IDS
test
ing
or c
ouns
elin
g se
rvic
es in
sel
ecte
d ge
ogra
phi
c ar
eas;
• Pe
rcen
tag
e o
f pre
gn
ant
wo
men
th
at k
no
w a
ll th
e im
po
rtan
t si
gn
s o
f pre
gn
ancy
co
mp
licat
ion
s an
d p
erce
nta
ge
of m
oth
-er
s w
ho
are
fam
iliar
wit
h m
ajo
r sig
ns
if il
lnes
ses
affe
ctin
g
you
ng
ch
ildre
n in
sel
ecte
d g
eog
rap
hic
are
as;
• N
um
ber
of c
hild
ren
wit
h e
xclu
sive
bre
ast-
feed
ing
in s
elec
t-ed
geo
gra
ph
ic a
reas
.Ba
selin
e: 3
5% k
now
sig
ns o
f pre
gnan
cy c
omp
licat
ions
; 22%
exc
lu-
sive
bre
ast f
eedi
ng
up
to 4
mon
ths;
Kn
owle
dge,
Att
itud
e, P
ract
ice
and
Beh
avio
r Su
rvey
on
Yout
h.
UN
FPA
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
(i
n U
NFP
A P
rog
ram
me
Pro
vin
ces)
• Pe
rcen
tag
e o
f peo
ple
in r
epro
du
ctiv
e ag
e se
ekin
g c
on
tra-
cep
tive
ser
vice
s;•
Co
nd
om
use
at
last
hig
h-r
isk
sex;
Base
line:
Kno
wle
dge,
Att
itude
and
Pra
ctic
e su
rvey
s to
be c
ondu
cted
.W
HO
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
� Pr
op
ort
ion
of p
atie
nts
ser
ved
by
Prim
ary
Hea
lth
Car
e o
ut
of
tota
l nu
mb
er o
f cas
es.
• St
ate
Stat
isti
c C
om
mit
tee,
Min
istr
y o
f Hea
lth
an
d r
esea
rch
in
stit
uti
on
s, C
abin
et o
f Min
iste
rs, M
inis
try
of P
ub
lic
Edu
cati
on
, Sci
enti
fic
Res
earc
h In
stit
ute
of P
edag
og
ical
Sc
ien
ces,
Rep
ub
lican
AID
S C
entr
e, In
terd
epar
tmen
tal w
ork
-in
g g
rou
p o
n H
IV/A
IDS,
USA
ID C
entr
al A
sian
Reg
ion
; HIV
/A
IDS
Tru
st p
oin
ts; s
enti
nel
su
rvei
llan
ces
and
sp
ecia
l stu
die
s w
ith
a d
rug
ab
use
co
mp
on
ent;
• A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Ban
k “W
om
an a
nd
Ch
ild H
ealt
h
Dev
elo
pm
ent”
pro
ject
rev
iew
s an
d r
epo
rts,
“H
ealt
h I”
an
d
“Hea
lth
II”
pro
ject
s (W
orl
d B
ank)
, Liv
ing
Sta
nd
ard
s A
sses
smen
t (W
orl
d B
ank)
, Liv
ing
Sta
nd
ard
Str
ateg
y (A
sian
D
evel
op
men
t B
ank,
Wo
rld
Ban
k an
d o
ther
s), U
NIC
EF
Info
rmat
ion
, Ed
uca
tio
n a
nd
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
Str
ateg
y, U
SAID
D
emo
gra
ph
ic H
ealt
h S
urv
ey (1
996
) an
d H
ealt
h E
xam
inat
ion
Su
rvey
(20
02),
Kn
ow
led
ge,
Att
itu
de
and
Pra
ctic
e su
rvey
s an
d e
xit
surv
eys
at c
linic
s (U
NFP
A).
1.
Co
nti
nu
ed c
om
mit
men
t to
Hea
lth
Ref
orm
;2.
C
om
mu
nit
y p
arti
cip
atio
n;
3.
Co
mm
un
ity
fin
anci
ng
mec
han
ism
s in
pla
ce;
4.
Inn
ova
tive
co
mm
un
ity
bas
ed h
ealt
h d
eliv
ery
mo
del
s te
st-
ed a
nd
ref
ined
.
29
Annexes
MO
NIT
OR
ING
AN
D E
VA
LU
ATIO
N P
LA
NP
riori
ty A
rea 4
: H
arm
on
iza
tion o
f N
ati
on
al
La
ws
an
d R
eg
ula
tion
s in
Acc
ord
an
ce w
ith I
nte
rna
tion
al
Con
ven
tion
sN
atio
nal
Pri
ori
ties
or
Mil
len
niu
m D
evel
op
men
t Go
als
“Im
ple
men
t int
ern
atio
nal
co
nven
tio
ns th
e co
untr
y is
sig
nat
ory
to, i
nteg
rate
the
pri
nci
ple
s of
sus
tain
able
dev
elo
pm
ent i
nto
coun
try
po
lices
an
d p
rog
ram
mes
; rev
erse
the
loss
of e
nvir
on
men
tal r
eso
urce
s” n
atio
nal
targ
et: “
pro
mot
e th
e ra
tio
nal
use
of e
nvir
on
men
tal r
eso
urce
s b
ased
on
pri
nci
ple
s of
sus
tain
able
dev
elo
pm
ent”
.U
ND
AF
Ou
tco
me
by
the
End
of t
he
Pro
gra
mm
e C
ycle
“By
2009
, do
mes
tic
law
s ar
e h
arm
on
ized
wit
h U
N le
gal
inst
rum
ents
, in
clu
din
g h
uman
rig
hts,
env
iro
nm
enta
l an
d re
fug
ee c
onv
enti
ons
, an
d th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
of th
e la
tter
are
imp
rove
d”.
Co
un
try
Pro
gra
mm
e O
utc
om
eIn
dic
ato
rs a
nd
Bas
elin
esP
artn
ers
Res
po
nsi
ble
an
d V
erif
icat
ion
Mea
ns
Ris
ks
and
Ass
um
pti
on
s4.
1. N
atio
nal
leg
isla
tio
n is
in c
om
pli-
ance
wit
h s
elec
ted
inte
rnat
ion
al c
on
-ve
nti
on
s, in
clu
din
g h
um
an r
igh
ts a
nd
en
viro
nm
enta
l co
nve
nti
on
s an
d im
-p
rove
d le
gal
pro
tect
ion
for r
efu
gee
s.
OH
CH
R o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
r•
Nat
ion
al s
trat
egie
s fo
r th
e p
rom
oti
on
of h
um
an r
igh
ts
ado
pte
d a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d.
Base
line:
Nat
ion
al A
ctio
n p
lan
to c
omb
at to
rtu
re is
pre
sent
ly b
e-in
g fi
nal
ized
; Nat
ion
al A
ctio
n Pl
an o
n Im
ple
men
tin
g th
e Re
com
men
dati
ons
of th
e U
N T
reat
y Bo
dy
is b
ein
g p
rep
ared
.U
NIC
EF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• N
um
ber
of l
aws
dev
elo
ped
an
d a
men
ded
to
th
e ex
isti
ng
le
gis
lati
on
mad
e in
co
mp
lian
ce w
ith
CR
C/C
EDA
W.
Base
line:
An
alys
is o
f th
e ex
isti
ng
legi
slat
ion
in c
omp
lian
ce w
ith
the
Con
vent
ion
on th
e Ri
ghts
of t
he
Ch
ild to
be
unde
rtak
en.
UN
OD
C o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
r•
Nat
ion
al la
ws
and
po
licie
s in
reg
ard
to
lici
t an
d il
licit
dru
g
con
tro
l are
in c
om
plia
nce
wit
h r
elev
ant
inte
rnat
ion
al c
on
-ve
nti
on
s.
Dat
a fr
om
th
e re
leva
nt
nat
ion
al in
stit
uti
on
s—N
atio
nal
Hu
man
R
igh
ts C
entr
e, O
mb
ud
sman
, Am
eric
an B
ar A
sso
ciat
ion
, Off
ice
of t
he
Hig
h C
om
mis
sio
ner
for H
um
an R
igh
ts R
egio
nal
Ad
vise
r o
f th
e R
egio
nal
Pro
ject
for C
entr
al A
sia.
1.
Co
nti
nu
ed c
om
mit
men
t fr
om
th
e G
ove
rnm
ent
and
inte
rest
fr
om
nat
ion
al in
stit
uti
on
s to
co
op
erat
e in
th
e ar
eas
of h
u-
man
rig
hts
;2.
C
on
tin
ued
su
pp
ort
an
d in
tere
st fr
om
do
no
rs, i
nte
rnat
ion
al
com
mu
nit
y, N
GO
s an
d b
usi
nes
s se
cto
r to
dia
log
ue
wit
h
go
vern
men
t an
d n
atio
nal
inst
itu
tio
ns
on
issu
es o
f hu
man
ri
gh
ts.
4.2.
En
han
ced
leg
al fr
amew
ork
, mo
ni-
tori
ng
an
d s
up
po
rt m
ech
anis
ms
are
in
pla
ce fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of U
N
hu
man
rig
hts
inst
rum
ents
.
UN
DP
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• N
atio
nal
str
ateg
ies
for t
he
pro
mo
tio
n a
nd
pro
tect
ion
of h
u-
man
rig
hts
ad
op
ted
an
d im
ple
men
ted
.Ba
selin
e: N
atio
nal
Act
ion
Plan
to C
omb
at T
ortu
re is
pre
sent
ly b
e-in
g fi
nal
ized
. Nat
ion
al A
ctio
n Pl
an o
n Im
ple
men
tin
g th
e Re
com
men
dati
ons
of th
e U
N T
reat
y-Bo
dies
is b
ein
g p
rep
ared
.O
HC
HR
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• Pu
blic
deb
ates
on
hu
man
rig
hts
ob
serv
ed;
• In
crea
se in
leg
al s
ervi
ces
pro
vid
ed b
y C
ivil
Soci
ety
Org
aniz
atio
ns
to t
he
mo
st v
uln
erab
le.
Base
line:
Lac
k of
lega
l lite
racy
and
pub
lic a
war
enes
s on
hum
an
righ
ts.
UN
ICE
F o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
Nu
mb
er o
f cas
es o
n v
iola
tio
n o
f ch
ild’s
rig
hts
rev
iew
ed b
y o
mb
ud
sman
off
ice
;•
Nat
ion
al P
lan
of A
ctio
n o
n t
he
Co
nve
nti
on
on
th
e R
igh
ts o
f th
e C
hild
imp
lem
enta
tio
n e
xist
s;•
Nu
mb
er o
f sta
te a
nd
NG
O r
epre
sen
tati
ves
wit
h in
crea
sed
kn
ow
led
ge
on
CR
C.
• N
atio
nal
Cen
tre
for H
um
an R
igh
ts, I
nst
itu
te fo
r Mo
nit
ori
ng
o
f Cu
rren
t Le
gis
lati
on
, UN
DP,
UN
ICEF
, UN
HC
R, H
um
an R
igh
ts
Do
no
rs C
oo
rdin
atio
n G
rou
p, O
liy M
ajlis
(Pa
rlia
men
t), O
ffic
e o
f th
e O
mb
ud
sman
, Min
istr
y o
f Fo
reig
n A
ffai
rs;
• St
atis
tics
Div
isio
n M
illen
niu
m in
dic
ato
rs (U
ND
ESA
), N
atio
nal
M
DG
Rs,
UN
DP
Nat
ion
al H
um
an D
evel
op
men
t R
epo
rts,
fol-
low
up
an
d r
epo
rts
on
Co
nve
nti
on
on
th
e R
igh
ts o
f th
e C
hild
, Co
mm
itte
e A
gai
nst
To
rtu
re, I
nte
rnat
ion
al C
on
ven
tio
n
on
th
e El
imin
atio
n o
f All
Form
s o
f Rac
ial D
iscr
imin
atio
n
Ag
ain
st W
om
en, I
nte
rnat
ion
al C
ove
nan
t o
n C
ivil
and
Po
litic
al R
igh
ts, a
nal
ytic
al a
nd
res
earc
h p
aper
s an
d le
gis
la-
tio
n r
evie
ws.
Stre
ng
then
ed c
om
mit
men
t fo
r leg
al r
efo
rms.
4.3.
Ob
ligat
ion
s u
nd
er in
tern
atio
nal
en
viro
nm
enta
l co
nve
nti
on
s an
d
agre
emen
ts fu
lfill
ed t
hro
ug
h im
-p
rove
d e
ffec
tive
nes
s o
f en
viro
nm
en-
tal m
anag
emen
t an
d d
evel
op
men
t o
f cl
ean
en
erg
y so
urc
es.
UN
DP
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
ors
• Im
pro
ved
cap
acit
y in
en
viro
nm
enta
l man
agem
ent
thro
ug
h
reo
rgan
izat
ion
of e
nvi
ron
men
tal g
ove
rnan
ce s
tru
ctu
res;
• N
atio
nal
Ren
ewab
le E
ner
gy
Stra
teg
y an
d N
atio
nal
Was
te
Man
agem
ent S
trat
egy
ado
pte
d a
nd
imp
lem
enta
tio
n s
tart
ed.
Base
line:
Nat
ion
al p
olic
y/st
rate
gic
pla
ns in
pla
ce, b
ut p
oor
ly im
-p
lem
ente
d (N
atio
nal
Bio
dive
rsit
y A
ctio
n Pl
an, N
atio
nal
En
viro
nm
enta
l Act
ion
Plan
, Nat
ion
al A
ctio
n Pl
an T
o C
omb
at
Des
erti
fica
tion
).
• St
ate
Stat
isti
cs C
om
mit
tee,
Sta
te C
om
mit
tee
for N
atu
re
Pro
tect
ion
—o
vera
ll co
ord
inat
ion
; Min
istr
y o
f Eco
no
my—
coo
rdin
atio
n o
f ren
ewab
le e
ner
gy
acti
viti
es; C
ou
nci
l of
Min
iste
rs o
f th
e R
epu
blic
of K
arak
alp
akst
an—
pilo
tin
g e
nvi
-ro
nm
enta
l pro
ject
s; H
ydro
met
eoro
log
y A
dm
inis
trat
ion
—cl
imat
e ch
ang
e; F
ore
stry
Mai
n B
oar
d u
nd
er t
he
Min
istr
y o
f A
gri
cult
ure
an
d W
ater
Man
agem
ent—
san
d s
tab
iliza
tio
n;
Stat
e B
io-C
on
tro
l Dep
artm
ent—
esta
blis
hm
ent
of n
ewly
p
rote
cted
are
as a
nd
res
ou
rce
man
agem
ent
app
roac
hes
.•
UN
DP
“En
viro
nm
enta
l In
dic
ato
r” p
roje
ct, A
sian
D
evel
op
men
t B
ank
“Co
un
try
Envi
ron
men
tal A
sses
smen
t”.
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
MO
NIT
OR
ING
AN
D E
VA
LU
ATIO
N P
LA
N
Pri
ori
ty A
rea 5
: G
ood G
overn
an
ceN
atio
nal
Pri
ori
ties
or
Mil
len
niu
m D
evel
op
men
t Go
als
“Sp
are
no
effo
rt to
pro
mot
e d
emo
crac
y an
d st
ren
gth
en th
e ru
le o
f law
as
wel
l as
resp
ect f
or a
ll in
tern
atio
nal
ly re
cog
niz
ed h
uman
rig
hts
and
fun
dam
enta
l fre
edo
ms,
incl
ud
ing
the
rig
ht to
dev
elo
pm
ent”
(Mill
eniu
m D
ecla
rati
on)
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
e b
y th
e En
d o
f th
e P
rog
ram
me
Cyc
le
“Str
eng
then
ed G
over
nm
ent a
nd
civi
l so
ciet
y ca
pac
ity
and
par
tner
ship
tow
ard
s m
ore
eff
ecti
ve g
over
nan
ce”.
Co
un
try
Pro
gra
mm
e O
utc
om
eIn
dic
ato
rs a
nd
Bas
elin
esP
artn
ers
Res
po
nsi
ble
an
d V
erif
icat
ion
Mea
ns
Ris
ks
and
Ass
um
pti
on
s
5.1.
En
ablin
g en
viro
nm
ent f
or c
ivil
so-
ciet
y to
par
tici
pat
e ac
tive
ly in
dev
el-
op
men
t pro
cess
es.
UN
DP
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• Ex
iste
nce
of m
ech
anis
ms
for c
on
sult
atio
ns
bet
wee
n
Go
vern
men
t an
d C
ivil
Soci
ety
Org
aniz
atio
ns
on
ref
orm
is-
sues
an
d p
rog
ram
mes
.Ba
selin
e: W
eak
mec
hani
sms f
or d
ialo
gue
and
cons
ulta
tion
s with
ci
vil s
ocie
ty d
urin
g po
licy
mak
ing
proc
ess.
UN
FPA
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• A
n o
per
atio
nal
ad
voca
cy n
etw
ork
of t
he
civi
l so
ciet
y an
d
you
th p
rom
oti
ng
rep
rod
uct
ive
hea
lth
an
d g
end
er e
qu
alit
y is
est
ablis
hed
an
d fu
nct
ion
ing
.Ba
selin
e: N
one
(UN
FPA
).U
NA
IDS
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• Pe
rcen
t o
f mah
alla
s’ le
ader
s tr
ain
ed o
n H
IV/A
IDS.
Base
line:
30%
in T
ashk
ent c
ity.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• N
um
ber
of e
stab
lish
ed a
nd
fun
ctio
nal
loca
l lev
el in
ter-
sec-
tora
l Go
vern
men
t co
mm
itte
es fo
r co
ord
inat
ion
of b
asic
se
rvic
es fo
r wo
men
an
d c
hild
ren
th
at in
clu
de
civi
l so
ciet
y,
wo
men
an
d y
ou
th.
• En
viro
nm
ent
and
hu
man
rig
hts
NG
Os,
Civ
il So
ciet
y O
rgan
izat
ion
s—aw
aren
ess,
cap
acit
y-b
uild
ing
, par
tner
ship
s;•
Reg
ion
al a
nd
loca
l au
tho
riti
es—
awar
enes
s, lo
cal p
artn
er-
ship
s;•
Nat
ion
al C
entr
e fo
r Hu
man
Rig
hts
, Mah
alla
Fo
un
dat
ion
—in
-fo
rmat
ion
an
d d
ata,
Min
istr
y o
f Eco
no
my,
Sta
te C
om
mit
tee
for N
atu
re P
rote
ctio
n, W
om
en’s
Co
mm
itte
e—ad
voca
cy,
con
sult
atio
n, j
oin
t in
itia
tive
s;•
USA
ID, O
SCE,
EC
, Am
eric
an B
ar A
sso
ciat
ion
, Fre
edo
m
Ho
use
—ad
voca
cy, f
un
din
g, m
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
rep
ort
ing
;•
Wo
rld
Ban
k —
smal
l gra
nts
pro
gra
mm
e to
loca
l bas
ed d
evel
-o
pm
ent
init
iati
ves
and
Co
mm
un
ity
Emp
ow
erm
ent
Net
wo
rk.
Stat
e co
mm
itm
ent t
o lib
eral
izat
ion
of p
arti
cip
atio
n an
d co
m-
mun
icat
ion
.
5.2.
Nat
ion
al c
apac
itie
s to
resp
on
d to
em
erg
enci
es s
tren
gth
ened
.U
NC
T o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
r•
Nu
mb
er o
f pu
blic
sec
tors
an
d c
ivil
soci
ety
staf
f tra
ined
na-
tio
nal
ly a
nd
per
reg
ion
s.
• M
inis
try
of E
mer
gen
cy S
itu
atio
ns,
Min
istr
y o
f In
teri
or,
Stat
e B
ord
er a
nd
Cu
sto
ms
Co
mm
itte
e an
d N
GO
s;•
UN
Dis
aste
r Man
agem
ent
Team
rec
ord
s an
d r
epo
rts,
Se
curi
ty P
lan
, Co
nti
ng
ency
Pla
n, U
N a
gen
cies
rec
ord
s.
Ren
ewed
inte
rest
by
Gov
ern
men
tal a
gen
cies
an
d N
GO
s al
ike
in d
isas
ter p
rep
ared
nes
s.
5.3.
Gov
ern
ance
issu
es a
dd
ress
ed in
G
over
nm
ent’s
pri
ori
ty re
form
pro
-g
ram
mes
.
UN
OD
C o
utc
om
e in
dic
ato
rs•
Nu
mb
er o
f tra
inin
g e
ven
ts a
nd
off
icia
ls t
rain
ed;
• Eq
uip
men
t p
rovi
ded
an
d c
orr
ectl
y u
tiliz
ed.
UN
ICEF
ou
tco
me
ind
icat
or
• Ex
iste
nce
of f
un
ctio
nal
mu
lti-
leve
l in
ter-
sect
ora
l man
age
-m
ent
mec
han
ism
for d
eliv
ery
of s
oci
al s
ervi
ces
for c
hild
ren
an
d w
om
en.
• R
epo
rts
fro
m U
N p
roje
cts,
wo
rksh
op
s an
d s
emin
ars,
pro
-g
ram
mes
an
d p
roje
ct e
valu
atio
n a
nd
Co
un
try
Fin
anci
al
Ass
essm
ent
(Wo
rld
Ban
k) w
hic
h m
akes
rec
om
men
dat
ion
s o
n h
ow
to
imp
rove
go
vern
ance
par
ticu
larl
y in
rel
atio
n t
o d
o-
no
r fid
uci
ary
risk
s;•
UN
OD
C p
roje
ct t
o fa
cilit
ate
resu
mp
tio
n o
f cro
ss b
ord
er a
c-ti
viti
es w
ith
Afg
han
ista
n a
nd
UN
OD
C o
n g
oin
g p
roje
ct s
up
-p
ort
to
th
e Pr
ocu
rato
r Gen
eral
’s o
ffic
e fo
r dat
a ve
rifi
cati
on
an
d r
epo
rtin
g.
1.
Co
nti
nu
ed c
om
mit
men
t b
y G
ove
rnm
ent
on
cu
sto
ms
mo
d-
ern
izat
ion
an
d c
oo
per
atio
n w
ith
focu
s o
n c
om
mu
nic
atio
n
tech
no
log
y;2.
C
on
tin
ued
wis
h fo
r reg
ion
al d
ialo
gu
e.
30
MO
NIT
OR
ING
& E
VA
LU
ATI
ON
PR
OG
RA
MM
E C
YCLE
CA
LEN
DA
RYe
ar 1
Year
2Ye
ar 3
Year
4Ye
ar 5
UN
CT
M&
E ac
tivi
ties
Surv
eys/
stu
die
sU
ND
AF
ou
tco
mes
1–2
–3Ye
ar 1
: Ho
useh
old
Bu
dg
et S
urve
y (G
over
nm
ent)
, Co
untr
y A
ssis
stan
ce S
trat
egy
(Wo
rld
Ban
k), C
oun
try
Eco
no
mic
Mem
ora
nd
um (W
orl
d Ba
nk)
, Liv
ing
Stan
dar
ds
Ass
essm
ent (
Wo
rld
Ban
k), L
inki
ng
Mac
roec
on
om
ic P
olic
y to
Pov
erty
Red
uct
ion
(UN
DP)
, Co
mm
on
Co
untr
y A
sses
smen
t (U
N),
Dem
og
rap
hic
Hea
lth
Surv
ey (U
SAID
), Li
vin
g St
and
ard
s St
rate
gy
(Gov
ern
men
t, A
sian
Dev
elo
pm
ent B
ank,
an
d W
orl
d Ba
nk)
, Stu
die
s re
late
d to
the
intr
od
uct
ion
of th
e W
HO
Liv
e Bi
rth
Def
init
ion
(WH
O, U
NIC
EF a
nd
USA
ID);
Prim
ary
Hea
lth
Car
e N
eed
s A
sses
smen
t (U
NIC
EF);
Infa
nt M
ort
alit
y C
ausa
l Fac
tor A
nal
ysis
, Ch
ild F
rien
dly
Sch
oo
l Stu
dy,
Mul
ti In
dic
ato
r Clu
ster
Sur
vey
(UN
ICEF
), Ra
pid
Sit
uati
on
Ass
essm
ent o
n D
rug
Ab
use
in C
entr
al A
sia
and
Inte
rnat
ion
al N
arco
tic
Co
ntro
l Bo
ard
Rep
ort
(UN
DO
C).
UN
DA
F o
utc
om
es 4
–5Ye
ar re
po
rt o
f th
e H
elsi
nki
Fed
erat
ion
, Hum
an R
ight
s W
atch
Wo
rld
Rep
ort
an
d In
tern
atio
nal
Nar
coti
c C
ont
rol B
oar
d Re
po
rt.
Year
2–3
–4–5
—to
be
det
erm
ined
.
Mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
ems
UN
DA
F o
utc
om
e 1–
2–3
Year
1: H
ealt
h In
form
atio
n Sy
stem
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g o
n En
suri
ng
Go
als
of C
hild
ren’
s W
ellb
ein
g in
Uzb
ekis
tan
(Cab
inet
of M
inis
ters
an
d U
NIC
EF),
Dev
Info
an
d C
hild
Info
sys
tem
(U
NIC
EF a
nd
UN
) , F
amily
Ass
ets
Mo
bili
zati
on
(UN
DP)
.A
ll U
ND
AF
ou
tco
mes
RC A
nn
ual R
epo
rt (U
N),
N/H
DR
(UN
DP)
, M
DG
R (G
over
nm
ent a
nd
UN
CT)
, Rep
ort
s o
n In
tern
atio
nal
Co
nven
tio
ns a
nd
Nat
ion
al P
lans
of A
ctio
ns i.
e. C
RC, C
AT, C
ERD
, CED
AW
, ICC
PR,
ICER
D, I
CES
CR
, UN
GA
SS, I
CPD
(UN
).Ye
ar 2
–3–4
–5—
to b
e d
eter
min
ed.
Eval
uati
ons
All
UN
DA
F o
utc
om
esYe
ar 1
: Fo
rwar
d Lo
oki
ng
Ass
essm
ent (
UN
DP)
, Co
mm
on
Co
untr
y A
sses
smen
t (U
N).
Year
3: U
ND
AF
Mid
Ter
m E
valu
atio
n (U
ND
P, U
NIC
EF a
nd
UN
FPA
).
Revi
ews
All
UN
DA
F o
utc
om
esYe
ar 3
: Mid
term
Rev
iew
s, C
oun
try
Pro
gra
mm
e Jo
int R
evie
ws.
Pla
nn
ing
ref
eren
ces
UN
DA
F ev
alua
tio
n m
ilest
on
esA
lign
men
t of U
ND
AF
wit
h n
atio
nal
Mill
enn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent G
oal
s (N
ovem
ber
200
3, U
NC
T); P
rep
arat
ion
of M
on
ito
rin
g an
d Ev
alua
tio
n Pl
an (D
ecem
ber
200
3, U
NC
T );
Co
untr
y Pr
og
ram
mes
an
d C
oun
try
Pro
gra
mm
e A
ctio
n Pl
ans,
incl
ud
ing
pos
sib
le jo
int p
rog
ram
min
g, p
rep
ared
an
d al
ign
ed fo
r im
ple
men
tati
on
, mo
nit
ori
ng
and
eval
uati
on
wit
h M
on
ito
rin
g an
d Ev
alua
tio
n Pl
an (2
004,
UN
DP,
UN
ICEF
an
d U
NFP
A);
Alig
nm
ent o
f UN
DA
F w
ith
Livi
ng
Stan
dar
ds
Stra
teg
y an
d M
illen
niu
m D
evel
op
men
t Go
als
Rep
ort
(Sep
tem
ber
200
4, U
NC
T);
An
nua
l Rev
iew
of C
oun
try
Pro
gra
mm
es a
gai
nst a
nn
ual w
ork
pla
n (D
ecem
ber
200
5/6/
7/8/
9, U
ND
P, U
NIC
EF a
nd
UN
FPA
); M
id T
erm
Co
untr
y Pr
og
ram
mes
Rev
iew
s (2
006,
UN
ICEF
, U
NFP
A, U
ND
P); J
oint
Co
untr
y Pr
og
ram
mes
Mid
Ter
m R
evie
ws
(200
5, U
ND
P, U
NIC
EF a
nd
UN
FPA
); Ev
alua
tio
n of
UN
DA
F b
ased
on
join
t co
llab
ora
tio
n an
d p
rog
ram
min
g, L
ivin
g St
and
ard
s St
rate
gy,
Mill
enn
ium
Dev
elo
pm
ent G
oal
s Re
po
rt (2
009,
UN
CT)
.
M&
E ca
pac
ity
bui
ldin
gTo
be
det
erm
ined
.
Use
of i
nfo
rmat
ion
Nat
ion
al o
r int
ern
atio
nal
Co
nfe
ren
ces
(to
be
det
erm
ined
), M
DG
rep
ort
ing
, Liv
ing
Stan
dar
d St
rate
gy
Act
ion
Plan
, Co
mm
on
Co
untr
y A
sses
smen
t (20
08) U
ND
AF
and
ind
ivid
ual U
NC
T ag
ency
Co
untr
y Pr
og
ram
mes
(200
9), A
d in
teri
m P
over
ty R
edu
ctio
n St
rate
gy
Pap
er (2
005)
.
Part
ner
Act
ivit
ies
Gov
ern
men
t Ho
useh
old
Bu
dg
et S
urve
y (q
uart
erly
), Su
rvey
s of
Sta
te S
tati
stic
s C
om
mit
tee
and
Lin
e M
inis
trie
s (q
uart
erly
), C
abin
et o
f Min
iste
rs (“
Mo
nit
ori
ng
the
Go
als
of th
e W
ell
Bein
g of
Ch
ildre
n” p
roje
ct);
Ad
inte
rim
Pov
erty
Red
uct
ion
Stra
teg
y Pa
per
(200
5).
31
Annexes
IND
ICA
TIV
E P
RO
GR
AM
ME
RESO
UR
CE
FR
AM
EW
OR
KEx
pec
ted
UN
DA
F O
utc
om
es
Ou
tco
me
1O
utc
om
e 2
Ou
tco
me
3O
utc
om
e 4
Ou
tco
me
5
“Str
eng
then
ed n
atio
nal
an
d lo
cal
leve
l cap
acit
y to
dev
elo
p, i
mp
le-
men
t an
d m
on
ito
r str
ateg
ies
for
imp
rovi
ng
livin
g st
and
ard
s an
d re
du
cin
g p
over
ty”.
“By
2009
, im
pro
ved
qua
lity
of b
a-si
c ed
uca
tio
n is
ach
ieve
d”
“By
2009
, eq
uita
ble
acc
ess
to
qua
lity
pri
mar
y h
ealt
h ca
re s
ervi
c-es
in s
elec
ted
area
s is
imp
rove
d”.
“By
2009
, do
mes
tic
law
s ar
e h
ar-
mo
niz
ed w
ith
sele
cted
UN
leg
al
inst
rum
ents
, an
d th
e im
ple
men
-ta
tio
n an
d m
on
ito
rin
g of
the
lat-
ter a
re im
pro
ved
”.
“Str
eng
then
ed G
over
nm
ent a
nd
civi
l so
ciet
y ca
pac
ity
and
par
tner
-sh
ip to
war
ds
mo
re e
ffec
tive
gov
-er
nan
ce”.
Esti
mat
ed a
vaila
ble
reso
urce
s
UN
DP
Co
re—
USD
7.0
87 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 9
.0 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 5
.8 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 8
.0 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 2
.0 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 1
.0 m
illio
n
UN
FPA
Co
re—
USD
0.5
mill
ion
Cor
e—U
SD 1
.8 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 1
.6 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 0
.1 m
illio
n
UN
ICEF
Co
re—
USD
2.7
8 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 2
.69
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
2.2
8 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 2
.42
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
1.7
5 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 1
.96
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
0.5
1 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 0
.68
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
0.5
1 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 0
.81
mill
ion
UN
HC
RC
ore
—U
SD 0
.11
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
0.1
7 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 0
.4 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 0
.25
mill
ion
UN
OD
CPr
ojec
t Fun
ds—
USD
0.1
4 m
illio
n U
NO
DC
Pro
ject
Fun
ds
Co
re—
USD
3.1
3 m
illio
n
WH
OC
ore
—U
SD 0
.02
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
0.0
2 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 1
.2 m
illio
nC
ore
—U
SD 0
.01
mill
ion
UN
ESCO
Co
re—
USD
0.5
mill
ion
Co
re—
USD
0.7
mill
ion
UN
IDO
Co
re—
USD
0.0
5 m
illio
nO
ther
—U
SD 1
.5 m
illio
n
Tota
l by
ou
tco
me
USD
22
.577
mil
lio
nU
SD 5
.53
mil
lio
nU
SD 8
.62
mil
lio
nU
SD 1
6.9
4 m
illi
on
USD
7.8
1 m
illi
on
Gra
nd
to
tal o
f in
dic
ativ
e re
sou
rces
for
all f
ive
ou
tco
mes
is t
hu
s ju
st a
bo
ve U
SD 6
0 m
illi
on
UNDAF for Uzbekistan 2005–2009
32