In Defense of Business

5
C-201 In Defense of Business—The Trading Game and the Morality of Free Exchange Ed Kless @edkless Senior Director, Partner Development and Strategy

description

This session is dedicated to the possibility that business is a noble yet frequently rebuked calling. With the constant bombardment from the media to the contrary, it is oftentimes difficult to see how businesses profit not only themselves, but all of society. So much so that the notion of having to "give back" to the community is redundant. If you are interested in learning more about this defense of business and the market, please join in the conversation led by Ed Kless, Sage senior director of partner development and strategy.

Transcript of In Defense of Business

Page 1: In Defense of Business

C-201In Defense of Business—The Trading Game and the Morality of Free Exchange

Ed Kless

@edkless

Senior Director, Partner Development and Strategy

Page 2: In Defense of Business

CPE Credit

• In order to receive CPE credit for this session, you must be present for the entire session. – Session Code: C-201– Recommended CPE Credit = 1.5– Delivery Method = Group Live– Field of Study = Specialized Knowledge and Applications

• Visit the Sage Summit Connect kiosks to enter CPE credit during the conference.

• Session PowerPoints and materials can be found on the Sage Summit Mobile App under Documents – except for this session, please give me a business card.

#SageSummit@sage_summit

Page 3: In Defense of Business
Page 4: In Defense of Business

Jay Richard’s Eight Myths of CapitalismMyth Example

Nirvana Contrasting capitalism with an unrealizable ideal rather than with its live alternatives

Piety Focusing on our good intentions rather than on the unintended consequences of our action

Zero-sum Believing that trade requires a winner and a loser

Materialist Believing that wealth isn’t created, it’s simply transferred

Greed Believing that the essence of capitalism is greed

Usury Believing that working with money is inherently immoral or that charging interest on money is always exploitive

Artsy Confusing aesthetic judgments with economic arguments

Freeze-frame Believing that things always stay the same—for example, assuming that population trends will continue indefinitely, or treating a current “natural resource” as if it will always be needed

Page 5: In Defense of Business

Thank you for your participation

• Contact Information: [email protected] or www.edkless.com or @edkless