Improving Decision-Making in Pre-birth Assessment: The OxPUP Project
-
Upload
baspcan -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
25 -
download
1
Transcript of Improving Decision-Making in Pre-birth Assessment: The OxPUP Project
Improving Decision-Making in Pre-birth Assessment:
The OxPUP Project
Jane BarlowProfessor or Public Health
in the Early Years
What are the risks in pregnancy?
OXPUP: Children’s Social Care Perinatal pathway
Results of pilot study
Structure of Paper
Parenting begins in pregnancy…
Parenting begins in pregnancy with: Prenatal behaviours that are
designed to protect and promote the wellbeing of the foetus;
A process of ‘bonding’ with the foetus that begins in the second trimester.
PHYSIOLOGICAL
Stress or Teratogen
s
Programming of foetus HPA
axis/neurological damage
Compromised physiological/emot
ional and behavioural functioning
PSYCHOLOGICAL/BEHAVIOURAL
Reflective Function in pregnancy
Atypical parenting
Behaviours
Disorganised Attachment
Pathways in Pregnancy
OXPUP - Care PathwayANTENATAL Identify high risk families during pregnancy – pre-
birth assessments at 18 weeks PuP Intervention begins ante-natally for 3 months BIRTH Assess parent-infant interaction; mother-baby foster
placements and concurrrent foster care where necessary
NEXT 8 MONTHS Continue time-limited intervention and clear goals
to be achieved; re-assess 2, 4, 6 months Remove infants where there is insufficient
improvement before 8 months
PUP Programme Evidence-based programme with high risk
families – eg. Families referred from child protection services (Harnett and Dawe 2008) parental substance abuse (Dawe and Harnett 2012; 2007) women leaving prison (Frye & Dawe 2008)
PUP is underpinned by an ecological model of child development and targets multiple domains of family functioning, including the psychological functioning of individuals in the family, parent–child relationships, and social contextual factors
Incorporates ‘mindfulness’ skills that are aimed at improving parental affect regulation and RF
PUP evaluation RCT with substance abusing parents of children
aged 2-8 years (Dawe and Harnett 2007)
Compared PUP with standard parenting programme
Significant reductions in parental stress; methadone dose and child abuse potential (significant worsening in the child abuse potential of parents receiving standard care); improved child behaviour problems
PUP Contains 12 modules, delivered across 20
calendar weeks; sessions in home; 1-2 hours; parent workbook
The selection and delivery of the modules is determined by the assessment
Additional case management occurs outside the treatment session, according to individual family need (e.g., housing, legal advice, school intervention)
Day-to-day issues such as housing and finances provide a therapeutic opportunity to put coping skills into practise in a mindful and emotionally contained manner
Capacity to Change Step 1: complete a cross-sectional assessment of
the family’s current functioning using a range of standardised tools (Time 1)
Step 2: define and agree measurable goals with the family that address their unique situation specifying what needs to change
Step 3: delivery of evidence-based intervention (PUP)
Step 4: re-administer the standardised tools that were used previously (Time 2)
PUP assessment Comprehensive assessment and individual case
formulation conducted collaboratively with the family
Self-report measures supported by a purpose built data base that is automatically scored and provides clinical feedback on all key measures
Specific targets for change are identified during the assessment, as part of an assessment of capacity to change; which then become the focus of treatment.
12 modules - each module comprises a theme that continues throughout treatment.
Ante-natal Assessment Tools Pre-birth assessment Standard pre-birth assessment
3 monthly assessment of functioning Mental health (DASS); Life events Scale (LES); Drug
and Alcohol screen; Domestic abuse screen (SARA)
Reflective function – once during prenatal and once postnatal
Pregnancy Interview and Parent Development Interview (PDI)
Postnatal Assessment tools
Parent-infant interaction – 3 minute videoclip (CARE-Index)
Home environment (HOME Inventory)
Mothers feelings about relationship with baby (Mother-Object relationship Scale)
Parenting Stress – Parenting Stress Index (PSI)
Level of expected outcome
Goal 1Decision making
Goal 2Self esteem
Goal 3Isolation
Review date:Much more than
expected
(+2)
Makes plans, follows through, modifies if
needed, and reaches goal
Expresses realistic positive feelings about
self
Actively participates in group or social activities
More than expected
(+1)
Makes plans, follows through without
assistance unless plan needs changing
Expresses more positive than negative
feelings about self
Attends activities, sometimes initiates contact with others
Most likely/expected outcome
(0)
Makes plans and follows through with
assistance/reminders
Expresses equally both positive and negative
feelings about self
Leaves house and attends community centre. Responds if
approached
Less than expected outcome
(-1)
Makes plans but does not take any action to
follow through
Expresses more negative than positive
feelings about self
Leaves house occasionally, no social
contact
Much less than expected
(-2)
Can consider alternatives but doesn't decide on a
plan
Expresses only negative feelings about self
Spends most of time in house except for formal
appointments
Cases to date CPT has taken 26 referrals. 3 pregnancies ended pre-term.
23 families have engaged fully with the programme CPT are case holders and have managed cases through
from referral to final hearing (in legal cases) and into the community for those families who have remained intact
6 cases have required legal proceedings - ICO applications made and granted at birth in all cases
Early full parenting assessments have been presented to Court throughout proceedings by CPT team rather than this being seen as a separate task
17 families have been supported to care for their children at home with on-going PUP intervention from CPT as well as appropriate local support services
CASE STUDY 1
Mum 24 self referred 14 weeks pregnant requesting help to keep her baby
6 previous pregnancy’s 1st at age 14: 1 miscarriage; 2 abortions; 1 removed at 18 months due to chronic neglect and non-accidental injury; 2 removed at birth due to high-risk lifestyle
4 fathers to the children all much older; all highly aggressive and all with drug/alcohol dependencies
Left area of her birth and severed links with family, peer and previous abusive relationships
Relocated and reporting at point of referral to be in a loving relationship
17
INTERVENTION Twice weekly sessions over period of 6 month View of self as parent: very emotional journey to explore her
own childhood traumas and to help her understand how to love and be a parent
Emotional Regulation: to help her to move away from guilt and blame; journey through denial and recognition and into responsibility in order to begin to forgive herself
Connecting to your Child: helping her to view the world from the eyes of her daughter; using her daughters cues and behaviours to increase parental sensitivity; video feedback
Building Relationships: to understand not just needs of herself and her baby but how to be a good partner, and what she should expect and accept from her partners
18
OUTCOME
Daughter remains in her parents care Connection between mother and daughter is
beautiful; mum is sensitive, caring and in total awe, not just of her child, but her relationship with her
Mum expresses that she cannot believe how good it feels to be allowed to love and be loved back
Mum and dad continue to parent together in a loving and supportive relationship
19
CASE STUDY 2
Mum 22 in relationship with abusive man aged 24 Extensive significant childhood trauma Parents relationship abusive; mum and siblings
chronically neglected and subjected to long-term emotional abuse
Mum continued into adulthood with no self-care skills; dirty, unhealthy diet, and emotionally withdrawn
1st Child removed due to neglect
20
INTERVENTION
Minimum 3 x a week over a 20 week period Independent housing secured, benefits reviewed and put in
place Life Skills: Personal Hygiene/self-care skills promoted to
increase self-esteem Emotional Regulation: and support to access GP for low mood Relationship module: to help her to address dependency on
abuser identify and avoid abuse View of self as Parent: to look at positive parenting styles and
identify the kind of parent she would like to be And much more…
21
OUTCOME
Two weeks before birth of child she opted to leave the accommodation and return to the abusive relationship
Within days presented as dirty and unkempt Two admissions to A&E following fainting episodes due
to hunger Failure to attend appropriate ante-natal care Low Iron, urine infections, weight loss and other
health issues ignored, placing self and unborn child at risk
Interim Care Order granted at birth and baby removed from mothers care
22
Care Proceedings Care proceedings for 6 CPT legal cases have all
been completed within 26 weeks; non-CPT cases all mostly outside of the 26 week requirement
Foster care costs for CPT cases are significantly less than non-CPT cases because permanency planning for CPT has been achieved more quickly - CPT cases is £58,490; non-CPT cases cases is £99,272
Court costs significantly less - CPT cases is £54,874; non CPT cases is £91,119
Publications Barlow J, Hall D (2012). Systematic Review of
Models of analysing Significant Harm. London: DfE.
Barlow J, Scott J (2010). Safeguarding in the 21st Century: Where to Now? Dartington: Research in Practice.
Ward et al (2010). Infants suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm: A prospective longitudinal study. London: DfE.
Barlow J, Schrader-McMillan A (2010). Safeguarding Children from Emotional Abuse: What Works? London: Jessica Kingsley.