Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu ›...

27
11/05/2010 1 Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT and CHANGE IT! David B. Gray, PhD Jessica Dashner, OTD OTR/L October 29, 2010 54.1 million people in the U.S. have a disability (2000 Census Board, as cited in Dowrick& Keys, 2001) People with disabilities encounter barriers in society (physical and attitudinal) (Gray and Hahn, 1997) ―Community receptivity‖ (as defined by Bricout& Gray, 2006) Barriers decrease participation in community and quality of life (Stark, Hollingsworth, Morgan, & Gray, 2007) Introduction

Transcript of Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu ›...

Page 1: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

1

Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT and CHANGE IT!

David B. Gray, PhD

Jessica Dashner, OTD OTR/L

October 29, 2010

54.1 million people in the U.S. have a disability (2000 Census Board, as cited in Dowrick& Keys, 2001)

People with disabilities encounter barriers in society (physical and attitudinal) (Gray and Hahn,

1997)

―Community receptivity‖ (as defined by Bricout& Gray, 2006)

Barriers decrease participation in community and quality of life (Stark, Hollingsworth, Morgan,

& Gray, 2007)

Introduction

Page 2: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

2

Reasons for Developing the Community Health Environment Checklists (CHEC)

Community environments are not designed to meet the needs of people with disabilities

Participation is impacted by how people are able to use their environments

By identifying barriers and supports in the community environment, features influencing participation will be identified

Important to consider social environment in addition to physical environment

Assessment tool designed to evaluate government and public areas in the community ADA Titles 2 & 3

Began as a generic tool for use by community members interested in making their buildings accessible –

o Easy to use

o Little training required

o Understandable scoring

Provides pragmatic solutions to problems encountered

o Not an ADAAG assessment

o Not for litigation

What is the Community Health Environment Checklists (CHEC) ?

Page 3: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

3

The purpose of the CHEC is to provide an objective measure of the environment (physical and social) including the features important to persons with disabilities

Can a person with a disability get in to a building do what they need to do and get out

Community Health Environment Checklists (CHEC)

Review existing literature on assessing receptivity

Methods

Key Informant Interviews

Focus Groups

Cognitive Mapping

Survey Draft

Feature Ranking by Individuals with Disabilities

Identifies Most Important Features

Development of Scoring

Interclass Correlations

Brief Training for Raters

CHEC Development Procedures

Page 4: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

4

Asked People with Disabilities to list where they go in their community and what facilitators and barriers they experience

Cognitive Mapping

15 Key Destinations Sites Government Buildings

Performance Venues

Large Stores

Small Stores

Dining Establishments

Schools and Libraries

Religious Facilities

Self Care Service Providers

Transportation

Health Care Providers

Health Vendors

Professional Service Providers

Indoor Leisure

Outdoor Leisure

Major Tourist Attractions

Page 5: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

5

Mobility

Restaurants

Doctor’s Offices

Exercise Facilities

Houses of Worship

Low Vision

Restaurants

Doctor’s Offices

Hard of Hearing

Restaurants

Doctor’s Offices

Existing CHEC Instruments

General Building General Building General Building

CHEC Version ICC

CHEC-General Mobility

.950

CHEC-General Hard of Hearing

.963

CHEC-General Low Vision

.921

CHEC-Restaurant Mobility

.890

CHEC-Restaurant Hard of Hearing

.890

CHEC-Restaurant Low Vision

.890

Interclass Correlations

Page 6: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

6

CHEC-Mobility 22 Features ■ Distances to Enter Building

■ Accessible Parking

■ Level Surfaces

■ Curb Cuts

■ Doors at Entrances

■ Signage for Accessible Paths to

Entrances

■ Doors Inside the Building

■ Loaner Scooters or Wheelchairs

■ Signage for Accessible Elements

■ Single Level

Maneuverable Spaces

Crowding

Floor Surfaces

Counters and Merchandise

Accessible Places to Sit

Adequate Lighting

Accessible Restroom

Drinking Fountain

Accessible Phone

Drive-through Window

Usability

Rescue Assistance

CHEC-M Feature Ranks

1. Entrance

2. Curb Cuts

3. Automatic Doors

4. Accessible Bathroom

5. Elevator/Single Level

6. Distance to Entrance

7. Accessibility features in order

8. Wide Spaces

9. Floor Surfaces

10. Lightweight Doors

11. Parking

12. Spaces not Crowded

13. Accessible places to sit

14. Accessible path/entrance marked

15. Accessibility Signage

16. Accessible Counters

17. Lighting

18. Accessible Phone

19. Accessible Drinking Fountains

20. Area of Rescue

21. Loaner Wheelchair/Scooter

22. Drive Through Window

Page 7: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

7

Section I ENTERING

THE BUILDING

Community Health Environment Checklist-Mobility (CHEC-M)

FEATURES

Accessible

parking

4. Are there accessible parking

spaces with adequate widths and

aisles?

Score Yes if there are accessible spaces and at least one space

a total width of 8 feet (including parking spot and aisles).

Score No if there are no accessible spaces or if the spaces do

not have adequate widths and aisles.

Score N/A if there is no parking available for the building.

If you are unsure if there is parking ask an employee.

(For picture see Glossary #1 and #2).

Yes No

N/A

5. Are the accessible spaces located

closest (or most central) to the

accessible entrance or accessible

route with minimal traffic to cross in

order to enter the building?

Score Yes if accessible spaces are closest to the accessible

route and most central to the entire group of businesses.

Score No the parking spots closest to the accessible route are

not “accessible parking”

OR Score NO if accessible spots are not central to the entire

group of businesses and not on accessible route.

Score N/A if there is no parking available for the building

If you are not sure if there is parking for a building, ask an

employee.(For a picture, see glossary #3)

Yes No

N/A

6. Does the facility have an

enforcement procedure to ensure

that accessible parking is used by

only those who need it?

Score Yes if when management was asked:

“What would you do and what are your employees to do if a

customer reports that an accessible parking space is being

used by someone who doesn’t need it?” He/She answered that

the police would be notified immediately of the situation, or

that the manager would ask the person to move the car to a

regular parking space.

Score N/A if there is no parking.

Yes No

N/A

Captioning

Low background noise

Seating arrangement (near walls or near speaker)

Low background music

Adequate lighting

Assistive technologies (listening devices/video phones/capTel phones/microphones)

Employees who speak slowly and clearly

Provision of pagers or buzzers (restaurants)

Alternative communication (pen and paper)

■ Interpreter ■ Seating type (small or round

tables, booths) ■ Minimal crowd ■ Training on use of assistive

technology ■ Acoustics (sound absorbing wall

and floor covering) ■ Text or visual aids

(signage/posters/monitors) accompanying oral messages

■ Assistance from stranger/employee/co-worker to locate item or repeat messages

■ Self check-out ■ Access to alternative room ■ Suggestions box ■ Proximity to employee for

lip reading

CHEC-Hard of Hearing 20 Features

Page 8: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

8

CHEC-HOH Feature Ranks 1. Low background noise

2. Captioning

3. Seating arrangement (near walls or near speaker)

4. AT (listening devices/video phones/capTel phones/microphones)

5. Employees who speak slowly and clearly

6. Minimal crowd

7. Seating type (small or round tables, booths)

8. Text or visual aids (signage/posters/monitors) accompanying oral messages

9. Low background music

10. Acoustics (sound absorbing wall and floor covering)

11. Adequate lighting

12. Proximity to employee for lip reading

13. Assistance from stranger/employee/co-worker to locate item or repeat messages

14. Training on use of assistive technology

15. Provision of pagers or buzzers (restaurants)

16. Access to alternative room

17. Alternative communication (pen and paper)

18. Self check-out

19. Suggestions box

20. Interpreter

Section I USING THE BUILDING

Community Health Environment Checklist-Hearing (CHEC-HOH)

FEATURES

Acoustics

ITEMS

1) Are sound absorbing materials on the walls

SCORING RULES Score Yes if site has drapes, tapestries, upholstery, or papered walls. Score No if the site does NOT have drapes, carpet or papered walls.

Yes No

N/A

2) Are sound absorbing materials present as flooring

Score Yes if floor covering is a sound absorbing material Score No if floor covering is NOT a sound absorbing material (e.g. marble, hard wood, tile)

Yes No

N/A

Page 9: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

9

CHEC-Low Vision 18 Features Accessible crosswalks

Painted curbs

Clear smooth pathways for outdoor walking

Clearly-marked exterior stairs/ramps with handrails for support

Clearly-marked wayfinding signs

Adequate exterior lighting

Accessible entrance

Clear/Smooth pathways for interior walking

Clearly-marked signs

Clearly-marked interior stairs/ramps with handrails for support

Adequate ambient lighting

Glare-reducing features

High environmental contrast

Accessible elevators

Employee assistance

Special seating

Adequate task lighting

Materials in alternative formats

CHEC-LV Feature Ranks

1. Glare-reducing features

2. Materials in alternative formats

3. Adequate exterior lighting

4. Adequate task lighting

5.Clearly-marked interior stairs/ramps with handrails for support

6.Clearly-marked signs

7. Clear smooth pathways for outdoor walking

8. Accessible crosswalks

9. Clearly-marked exterior stairs/ramps with handrails for support

10. Adequate ambient lighting

11. Clear/Smooth pathways for interior walking

12. High environmental contrast

13. Clearly-marked wayfinding signs

14. Employee assistance

15. Accessible elevators

16. Accessible entrance

17. Painted curbs

18. Special seating

Page 10: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

10

Section II USING THE BUILDING

Community Health Environment Checklist-Vision (CHEC-LV)

FEATURES Glare Reducing Features

ITEMS

25. Are there features to

reduce glare?

SCORING RULES

Score Yes if the floor covered

in matte tile or carpet AND

windows are tinted or have

window coverings such as

blinds.

Yes No

N/A

26. Is there a high level of

contrast between the floor

and walls?*

*See Contrast Guide

Score Yes if the floor and

walls have a contrast of 70%

or higher. Score Yes if the baseboards

have a contrast of 70% or

higher with the wall and floor.

Yes No

N/A

Community Health Environment Checklists (CHEC) Utility

Page 11: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

11

Overall Utility of the CHEC The CHEC is a objective, valid and reliable

measure of environmental accessibility

Accessibility and Receptivity can be characterized at the Destination/Site Level

Building site CHEC score

Section scores

Accessibility and Receptivity can be characterized at the Community Level –

Total CHEC Scores on a sample of destination sites

CHEC-Building Testing

Assessing 150 buildings in St. Louis, Missouri using the CHEC-M, CHEC-LV and CHEC-HOH

10 sites in each destination category were randomly selected using 411.com and yellowpates.com

Results were used to compare sites in across and within categories

Page 12: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

12

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Acce

ssib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC-GM CHEC GV CHEC GHLV HOH M

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CVS Dierbergs Jennifer's Ladue Schnucks Target MedicineShoppe

Walgreens West Pine Williams

Acce

ssib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

Accessibility of Health Vendors

CHEC-M CHEC-LV CHEC-HOH

Page 13: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Old Navy Target WalMart HomeDepot

Lowes OfficeDepot

Office Max Artmart Crate &Barrel

REI

Accessib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

Accessibility of Large Stores

CHEC-M CHEC-LV CHEC-HOH

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Acce

ssib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC-M Health Vendor Section Scores

Enter Building Using Building Restrooms Amenities Usability/Rescue Assist

Page 14: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Old Navy Target WalMart Home Depot Lowes Office Depot Office Max ArtMart Crate & Barrel REI

Acce

ssib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC-M Large Store Section Scores

Enter Building Using Building Restrooms Amenities Usability/Rescue Assist

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Walgreens Jennifer's Williams Schnucks TheMedicine

Shoppe

CVS Target Dierbergs Ladue West Pine

Accessib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC-LV Health Vendor Section Scores

Exterior of Building Interior of Building Lighting & Contrast Amenities

Page 15: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

OfficeMax

OfficeDepot

HomeDepot

Lowes Wal Mart Target Old Navy Artmart REI Crate &Barrel

Accessib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC-LV Large Store Section Scores

Exterior of Building Interior of Building Lighting & Contrast Amenities

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Walgreens Jennifer'sPharmacy:

WilliamsPharmacy

SchnucksPharmacy

The MedicineShoppe

CVS Pharmacy Target:Pharmacy

Dierbergs:Pharmacy

LaduePharmacy LLC

West PinePharmacy

Acce

ssib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC HOH Health Vendor Section Scores

Building Sounds Communication Employee Assistance Room Arrangement Ammenities

Page 16: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Office Max Office Depot Home Depot Lowes Wal Mart Target Old Navy Artmart REI Crate & Barrel

Acce

ssib

ilit

y P

erc

en

tag

e

CHEC HOH Large Store Section Scores

Building Sounds Communication Employee Assistance Room Arrangement Ammenities

Site Specific CHECs

Page 17: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

17

Addition of features unique to destination category

Combine Mobility, Hearing, and Vision on one form

Inclusion of specific measurements for recommendation purposes

Examples:

Doctor’s Offices

Restaurants

Site Specific CHECs

Measures accessibility of general (public) spaces in addition to features inside the office

Addresses mobility, vision, and hearing on one form

Collects additional data needed to make recommendations/suggestions for change

CHEC-Doctor’s Office (CHEC-DO)

Page 18: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

18

CHEC-DO Section I

ARRIVING AT THE

OFFICE/CLINIC

ITEM RULE

Covered Pick Up/Drop Off

Area

1. Is there a covered pick-up/drop-

off area near an accessible entrance?

H V M

Score Yes if there is a pick-up or drop-off area

with an overhang, awning, or other structure

that blocks people from natural elements (e.g.,

sun, rain) located near the accessible entrance.

Score No if there is a pick-up or drop-off area

with a structure that blocks people from natural

elements, but the structure is not near an

accessible entrance.

Score No if there is no structure that blocks

people from natural elements present near an

accessible entrance.

Yes

No

Directories

Directories may either be on

the wall or free-standing.

Directories give a listing of

healthcare providers,

locations of provider offices

(e.g. Floor number, office

numbers) in a large

healthcare facility.

2. If the building is a large health care

facility, is there a directory located as

close to the accessible entrance as

possible?

H V M

Score Yes if there is a directory located as close

to the accessible entrance as possible.

Score No if there is a directory, but it is not

located as close to the accessible entrance as

possible.

Score N/A if the building is not a large

healthcare facility.

Yes

No

N/A

Distance from accessible

entrance to directory:

______ ft.

3. If the building is a large health care

facility, is there an informed greeter

available as close to an accessible

entrance as possible?

V

Score Yes if there is an informed greeter as close

to the accessible entrance as possible.

Score No if there is an informed greeter, but the

greeter is not as close to the accessible entrance

as possible.

Score N/A if the building is not a large

healthcare facility.

Yes

No

N/A

Distance from accessible

entrance to greeter:

________ ft.

CHEC-DO Section II WAITING/CHECK IN AREA

ITEM RULE

Accessible check in and check

out area

12. Is the check-in counter at an

accessible height for a person using a

wheelchair?

M

Score Yes if the height of the check-in counter is

36 inches or less.

Score No if the check-in counter is more than 36

inches.

Yes No

Counter height: ____________ in.

13. Is the check-in area free from a

frosted glass window or other visual

obstruction?

V

Score Yes if the check-in area is open so a person

can communicate directly with a receptionist

Score No if there is frosted glass or another

barrier present at the check in area.

Yes No

14. Are there alternative forms of communication offered during the check-in process for someone who is deaf or has hearing loss? H

Score Yes if an interpreter, messaging system, or

other form of communication is offered to an

individual who is deaf or experiences hearing loss

Score No if there is no alternative form of

communication offered.

Yes No

Accessible seating in waiting

area

15. Is there accessible seating in the

waiting area?

M

Score Yes if there options of accessible places to

sit that are integrated into the waiting room area,

including a space for someone seated in a

wheelchair.

Score No if there are no options of accessible

seating integrated into the waiting area.

Score N/A if the facility does not have a waiting

area.

Yes No

N/A

Page 19: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

19

CHEC-DO Section III EXAM ROOM and EQUIPMENT

ITEM RULE

21. Is there an accessible bathroom in the office or clinic area? H V M

Score Yes if there is a bathroom that is accessible located in or near the examination area. Score No if there is an accessible bathroom, but it is not located in or near the examination area. OR Score No if there is a bathroom that is in or near the examination area, but it is not accessible. OR Score No if there is no bathroom.

Yes No

Maneuverable spaces 22. Is there space to maneuver in the exam room? M

Score Yes if there is a 60” diameter clear floor space in the examination or treatment room. Score No if there is not a 60’’ diameter clear floor space in the examination or treatment room.

Yes No

Diameter of clear floor space: ___________in.

Height-adjustable exam table 23. Is there a height-adjustable exam table?

Score Yes if there is an examination table that can be lowered to a height of 18’’ from the floor. Score No if there is no examination table that can be lowered to a height of 18’’ from the floor. Score N/A if the facility does not have examination tables.

Yes No

N/A

Height of exam table: ___________in.

Accessible screening and diagnostic procedures

24. Is the diagnostic and screening equipment (x-ray equipment, mammography machine) accessible? M

Score Yes if the diagnostic and screening equipment is accessible to a person who uses a wheelchair. Score No if the diagnostic and screening equipment is not accessible to a person who uses a wheelchair. Score N/A if the facility does not have diagnostic or screening equipment.

Yes No

N/A

25. Is there an alternative form of communication used to communicate with someone who is deaf or has hearing loss during diagnostic and screening procedures? H

Score Yes if there are alternative forms of communication used during diagnostic and screening procedures (interpreter, written communication, and lip-reading). Score No if there are no alternative forms of communication used during procedures. Score N/A if the site does not perform diagnostic or screening procedures.

Yes No

N/A

Accessible scale 26. Is there a scale that can be used to weigh someone in a wheelchair? M

Score Yes if there is a scale that a person in a wheelchair can roll onto to be weighed. Score No if there is no scale that a person with a wheelchair can roll onto to be weighed. Score N/A if the facility does not have scales to weigh patients/clients.

Yes No

N/A

Accessible changing room 27. Is there an accessible changing room for someone to put on or take off a gown, if necessary, during examination procedures? M

Score Yes if there is a changing room with at least a 60’’ diameter of clear floor space, and a seat/bench that is no more than 18’’ from the floor. Score No if there is a changing room, but there is not enough clear floor space or a seat/bench at the appropriate height. Score N/A if the facility does not offer changing rooms.

Yes No

N/A

Diameter of clear floor space: __________in.

Minimal background noise 28. Is there minimal background noise? H

Score Yes if there is minimal background noise in the examination or treatment area. Score No if there is not minimal background noise in the examination or treatment area.

Yes No

Page 20: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

20

Restaurants were assessed using the CHEC-M and CHEC-RM/CHEC-RH/CHEC-RV

Raters entered the restaurants as patrons

Measured the physical environment (Entrance, space inside, restrooms, etc.)

Assessed social receptivity (asked server or manager about customer service)

CHEC Restaurant Assessments

Section I ARRIVING AT RESTAURANT

Community Health Environment Checklist- Restaurant Edition (CHEC-R)

FEATURES Space for Wheelchair in Reception Area

ITEMS 1. Is there a reception area? M1

SCORING RULES 1. Score Yes if there is a reception area. Score No if there is NOT a reception area.

Yes No

2. Is there a clear, wide space for a person using a wheelchair to move around the reception area? M2

2. Score Yes if there is a 5-foot circular space for a person using a wheelchair in the reception area. Score No if there is not a 5-foot circular space in the reception area. Score N/A if the restaurant does not have a reception area.

Yes No

N/A

Amount of space for wheelchair: ________ x ________ ft.

Accessible Waiting Area

3. Are there accessible places to sit that are integrated into the waiting area seating? M3

3. Score Yes if there are accessible places that are integrated into the waiting area seating. Score Yes if the accessible space is at least 30 inches wide and 32 inches deep. Score No if there are no accessible spaces integrated into the waiting area seating. Score No if the accessible space is less than 30 inches wide and 32 inches deep. Score N/A if the restaurant does not offer a waiting area.

Yes No

N/A

Amount of space for seating: ________ x ________ in.

Acoustics 5. Are there H5 materials that buffer sound?

Score Yes if the restaurant has materials that buffer sound (e.g., drapes, carpet, or papered walls). Score No if the restaurant does NOT have any materials that buffer sound.

Yes No

Materials: ______________________________

Page 21: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

21

Restaurant Average Assessment Scores

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CHEC-GM CHEC-RM CHEC-RV CHEC-RH

Accessib

ilit

y P

erc

enta

ge

Miss Saigon – Delmar Blvd in University City, MO

Very well lit, light wall colors, very quiet inside, separate dining rooms

Tables very spread out, options for large circular tables and accessible tables

Restroom mostly accessible

Positive Restaurant Example

Page 22: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

22

Johnny’s Bar – Russell Street St. Louis, MO

No accessible entrance

No accessible parking

No accessible bathroom—no access from wheelchair

Crowded, and LOUD

No service accommodations

―Awful! Servers were rude!‖

Negative Restaurant Example

Obtain a contact when sites are visited Compilation and explanation of CHEC

scores Explanation of positive and negative

features in the building that affect participation

Resources to make improvements to current barriers

CHEC Assessment packet is available upon request

Dissemination: CHEC Reports

Page 23: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

23

Google Maps = FREE

Link to maps from web

Ability to edit/change

Dissemination: Google Maps

Page 24: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

24

Page 25: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

25

Maximum

Summary of the CHEC

Receptivity and Accessibility can be characterized at the Community Level Total CHEC Scores on a sample of destinations

Receptivity of ―accessible restrooms‖ of entire community (features by destination)

Receptivity and Accessibility can be characterized at the Destination Level Total CHEC score of the destination or Area of a

building (this building)

Section scores

Receptivity of features (seating)

Page 26: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

26

Developing community partnerships Outcome measurement for Community

Engagement Initiatives ◦ Pre-Post Analysis

Train Paraquad, Inc. Community Advocate Group to administer assessments ◦ Primarily participants with mobility

and vision impairments

Develop additional site and impairment specific versions

Future Directions

Holly Hollingsworth, PhD

Susan Stark, PhD

Kerri Morgan

Denise Curl Dickerson

Jackie Webel, Meghan Gottlieb, Lisa Garrett

Graduate Students

Emilie Marty

Rachel Dargatz

Susan Crumbaugh

Jaclyn Tarloff

Acknowledgments

Page 27: Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT ... › sites › rtcil.drupal.ku.edu › files › images... · Improving Community Receptivity by Advocacy: CHEC IT OUT

11/05/2010

27

David B. Gray

[email protected]

314-286-1658

Jessica Dashner

[email protected]

314-286-1640

Contact Information