Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their … · 2020. 5. 29. · Methodology of...
Transcript of Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their … · 2020. 5. 29. · Methodology of...
1
Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their Results
Workshop Report Organizers:
1. Protected Area Management Department, Ministry of Nature, Environment and Tourism
2. WWF Mongolia Programme Office 3. Commmunity Based Conservation of Biodiversity in
Altai Sayan Region
08-09 December 2008
Khovd Aimag
2
Acknowledgements Great thanks to the colleagues of Protected Area Management Department of
Ministry of Nature Environment and Tourism and the Community Based Biodiversity Conservation of Altai Sayan that jointly organized the workshop on Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their Results.
It is our pleasure to express the deepest graditute to all of you for our close cooperation towards great success in terms of environmental conservation efforts.
For more detailed information on the workshop, please contact with the following addresses:
Yo. Onon, Wildlife Programme Manager, WWF Mongolia, [email protected] O. Munkhtogtokh, Conservation Specialist, Altai Sayan Branch, WWF Mongolia, [email protected] Telephone: +976-11-311659
A Table of Contents Brief Introduction on Workshop........................................................................................................... 3 Methodology of Management Plan Implementation Appraisal............................................................ 3 Overall assessment of PA management plans ...................................................................................... 4 Most immediate or important tasks to be dealt with in the future: ....................................................... 6 Appendix 1............................................................................................................................................ 9 Workshop participants .......................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix 2.......................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix 3.......................................................................................................................................... 15 Management Plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region and overall assessment findings & results (1. Management plan issues & 2. Protected Areas) ................................................................................. 15
3
Brief Introduction on Workshop With the purpose to assess the implementation of management plan for Protected
Area in Altai Sayan Eco-Region in Western Mongolia, to share experiences, and jointly identify main challenges encountered the management plan implementation, the workshop on Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their Results was organized in Khovd Aimag center on 08-09 December, 2008.
The workshop was attended by 25 specialists and management team members from
seven Protected Area Administrations that manage and supervise six Strictly Protected Areas, 10 National Conservation Parks, and two Nature Reserves that lie in Altai Sayan Eco-Region. The Protected Areas in the eco-region are very specific with their ecological conditions that include alpine, tundra, flat plains, forest steppe ecosystems and internationally important wetlands (listed to the RAMSAR Convention).
In order to ensure adequate efficient enforcement and upgrade the Protected Area
conservation regimes, the management plans are developed and implemented for Protected Areas. At the moment, management plans for Khokh Serkh, Myangan Ugalzat and Munkh-khairkhan Protected Areas in the Altai Sayan Eco-Region are being developed and discussed by relevant stakeholders. The rest of Protected Areas in the eco-region, have had their management plans and the plans are in progress of their implementation. Some of the Protected Areas have had their second management plans that are in their development and approval phases.
Up to now, no any specific review or assessment on implementation process of
Protected Area management plans has been conducted. However, this workshop was designed to assess or review the implementation process of Protected Areas in the eco-region through development and use of a methodology for PA management plan appraisal.
Methodology of Management Plan Implementation Appraisal Basically, a management plan for Protected Area consists of the following three parts:
Part one: covers mostly research data and findings particularly on biological
diversity, natural features, and resources of the Protected Area. Accordingly, the part one includes all relevant research findings and information on wildlife (plant and animal) species, forests, water resources, soil erosion, tourism activities, historical and cultural sites and their current states.
Part two: covers all reasearch findings and data relavant to potential and actual
threats and pressure to the biodiversity, natural resources. The part two also includes descriptions of living conditions of local communities, population, levels of ecological education, seasonal movements and settlements of herders (land use practices), animal husbandry, pastureland degredation, and overgrazing, illegal hunting, mining operations, tourism activities, infrastructural development, ubsustainable use of non-timber forest products and woody plants, fires, and climatic change impacts.
Part three: covers management options for reduction and elimination of potential and actual threat and pressure causes. This part also covers public awareness activities,
4
monitoring and patrolling, options for improvement of public participation, restoration activities, Protected Area management and material resources, and budget.
The impelementaion of the activities relevant to three parts above mentioned was
assessed with 0-5 scores. Appraisal or Ranking values: 0- The issue is not contigent/relevant to the PA. 1- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 1-20 per cent. 2- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 21-40 per cent. 3- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 41-60 per cent. 4- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 61-80 per cent. 5- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 81-100 per cent. For appraisal, we assessed the implementation of management plans of specific PA
setting a period of time.
Overall assessment of PA management plans Regarding the implementation of research and monitoring on biological diversity and
natural resources that are required to be immediately conducted throughout the PA system of Altai Sayan Eco-Region, as stated in the management plans, the 50-60 per cent of forest, fauna, and water have been completed so far. However, the 34-42 % researches and monitoring on soil erosion, tourism and historically and culturally significant areas have been completed (Graph1). Overall, the 55-62% of activities stated in the management plans for Turgen and Tsagaan Shuvuut SPAs, and Siilhem, Munkh-khairhan, and Khovsgol NCPs have been implemented, while the implementation of researches and monitoring on biodiversity and natural resources stated in the management plans for Ulaan Taiga and Altan Els SPA and Tsambagarav, Myangan Ugalzat and Devel Aral NCPs is unsatisfactory or 27-40 % (Diagram 1).
53.5%60.2% 65.0%
42.1%
61.0%
34.7%
46.5%39.8% 35.0%
57.9%
39.0%
65.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
Fauna Flora Forest Soil erosion Water Researches ontourism,
historically andculturally
significantareas
Implemetation rate (in per cent) Uncompleted tasks or gaps implementation (in per cent)
Diagram 1. Accomplishment of researches and monitoring on current status of biodiversity and natural resources
5
Among the researches and monitoring on potential and actual threats and pressures to biodiversity and natural resources throughout the Proteected Area system in Altai Sayan Eco-Region, the researches on ecological education of local communities residing the PAs and infrastructural impacts have been conducted unsatisfactorily (or 43-49 %) (Diagram 2).
70.5% 72.6%
43.1%
67.8% 61.1%71.6% 63.1% 63.5% 58.7% 66.3%
49.1% 56.9%
29.5% 27.4%
56.9%
32.2% 38.9%28.4% 36.9% 36.5% 41.3% 33.7%
50.9% 43.1%
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2Li
ving
con
ditio
ns o
f loc
al c
omm
unitie
s
Popu
latio
n
Leve
ls o
f eco
logi
cal e
duca
tion
Seas
onal
mov
emen
ts a
nd s
ettle
men
ts o
fhe
rder
s (la
nd u
se p
ract
ices
)
Anim
al h
usba
ndry
, pas
ture
land
degr
edat
ion,
and
ove
rgra
zing
Poac
hing
Min
ing
Tour
ism
Fire
Clim
atic
cha
nge
impa
cts
Infra
stru
ctur
e
Ubs
usta
inab
le u
se o
f non
-tim
ber f
ores
tpr
oduc
ts a
nd w
oody
pla
nts
Implemetation rate (in per cent) Uncompleted tasks or gaps implementation (in per cent)
Diagram 2. Researches and monitoring on potential and actual threats and pressures to the biodiversity and other natural resources
According to the assessment findings, the research and monitoring on potential and
actua threats and pressures to biodiversity and natural resources in Khokh Serkh and Ulaan Taiga SPAs has been conducted unsatisfactorily (or 35-45 %).
61.5 per cent of public awareness activities, 70.5 per cent of community participation tasks, 71.2 per cent of patrolling and monitoring, 58.1 per cent of restoration activities, 60.6 per cent of administration and managemen tasks, and 55.5 per cent of material resources as stated in management plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region have been completed and undertaken (Diagram 3).
6
61.5%70.5% 71.2%
58.1% 60.6% 55.5%
38.5%29.5% 28.8%
41.9% 39.4% 44.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Public awarenessactivities
Options forimprovement of
public participation
Monitoring andpatrolling
Restorationactivities
Protected Areamanagement
Budget
Implemetation rate (in per cent) Uncompleted tasks or gaps implementation (in per cent)
Diagram 3. Accomplishment of activities or tasks dealing with reduction of potential and actual threats and pressures to the diversity stated in management plans for PAs
Demarcation within PAs has been unsatisfactorily (or 45 %) accomplished, issuance
of powers of environmental inspectors to PA rangers is 30 %, and capacity building of rangers is 53.3 %. According to the overall accomplishment of management plan activities the public awareness activities have been successfully conducted in Uvs Nuur Basin SPA, Sharga Mankhan NR, and Khovsgul NCP. However, the public awareness activities wer unsatisfactorily (or 50 %) conducted in Mongol Altai Nuruu, Khasagt Khairkhan and Khoridol Saridag SPAs.
Accomplishment of patrolling and monitoring within PAs is more thant 60 %. Among the PAs, Uvs Nuur Basin SPA administration is successfully dealing with the tasks.
Regarding the improvement of community participation in natural resource management, the task has been unsatisfactorily dealt with.
According to the overall assessment findings, the conseravation tasks stated in the management plan for Sharga Mankhan NR, Uvs Nuur Basin SPA, and Khovsgol NCP have been successfully undertaken. Nevertheless, the conservation tasks stated in the management plans for Ulaan Taiga SPA and Devel NR has been unsatisfactorily implemented.
Based on the findings and results above mentioned, the Recommendations on focus on potential improvement for 2009 have been made.
Most immediate or important tasks to be dealt with in the future: Workshop participants identified the most immediate or important tasks to be dealt
with for 2009 e.g. studies on ecological education of local communities, improvement of community participation in natural resource management, capacity building of rangers and researchers and specialists, demarcation of PAs, and improvement/ upgrading of conservation management of Devel NR and recommended the following tasks to jointly deal with:
7
1. Conduct studies on ecological education of local communities:
• Researchers and specialists of Uvs Nuur Basin SPA administration will develop research methodologies by 1 February 2009 and distribute the draft methodologies to other PA administration for comments;
• PA administrations shall post their research reports on www.econet.mn by 01 May 2009 for information sharing having sent them to WWF Mongolia,
2. Improvement of community participation in natural resource management:
• WWF Mongolia and a project Community based Conservation of Biodiversity in Altai Sayan region will jointly organize a workshop on community participation for PA specialists and rangers in Uvs Aimag in the first half of March 2009.
• Khar Us Nuur NCP administration will organize a festival of community group development in Khovd Aimag in September 2009.
3. Demarcation:
• In overall, demarcation of PAs in Altai Sayan region is poor. Due to poor demarcation throughout the PAs, it is unclear where the PAs lie and the PAs are hardly recognized. Thus, PAs in the region need immediate demarcation. Some PAs need repairing or renewing demarcation points. PA administrations need to have required funds for demarcation through allocating funds in their annual budgets. The PA administrations have been assigned with the task to estimate required funds, submit to MNE for approval and commence the tasks immediately.
• It has been agreed to renew and update the nformation bulleten boards at their expenses.
4. Improvement of current Devel NR conservation management:
• Conduct researches and assessments on biodiversity; • Assess the current status of natural resource uses and make recommendations
on improved conservation management; • Implement community participation based conservation management; • Have conservation regimes approved by respective Aimag Citizen’s
Representative Khurals and Governors and follow up their enforcement; 5. Capacity building of rangers:
• Training on research methodology of fish resources; • Training on methodologies on planting of very rare plants by their seeds; • Training on improvement of presentation and reporting skills for rangers; • Training for improvement of biological education/knowledge for rangers; • Training/ workshop on forest management; • Training/workshop on identification of pastureland reserves and carrying capacity
and monitoring methodologies;
8
At the end of workshop, the participants have agreed the PA administrations would annually do (regularize) their self assessment having dealth with the achievements and lessons learnt as well as sharing experiences. They have agreed to organize 2009 self assessment meeting at Khovsgol NCP administration in September 2009.
WWF Mongolia organizes on-line training on Protected Areas-Eco Tourism from
10 to 2 December for specialists and researchers of PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region. The host organization introduced and handed in technical methodological instructions to participants. Researchers and specialists including Nazguli and Amanbek from Mongol Altai SPA administration, Narantsetseg, Jamyanjav, Khulganaa, and Purevdorj from Khovsgol Nuur NCP, Javzansuren from Uvs Nuur Basin SPA, Ganzorig and Tseveensuren from Khar Us Nuur NCP, Jargaltsetseg, Olonbaatar, and Tsetsegbadam from Sharga Mankhan NR and Bayanmunkh and Bayarsaikhan from Munkh-khairkhan NCP will attend the upcoming online training. Training on Protected Areas-Eco Tourism consists of four sections and each section has its exams. The participants, who will attend the upcoming training, will take final exam on 26 December.
9
Appendix 1.
Workshop participants № Names
Orgnizations & job titles Contact address:
1
Yo. Onon
WWF Mongolia о[email protected] 99041045
2
D. Chinbat
Khar Us Nuur SPA administration [email protected] 99439815, 0143222539
3
T. Lkhagvadorj
Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration
Munkhkhairkhan soum of Khovd aimag
4
Kh. Purevdorj Khovsgol NCP administration Khatgal, Khovsgol 98388454
5
Z. Nyambayar Land Use Agency, Khovsgol aimag [email protected] 99156669
6
B. Buyantsog Uvs Nuur Basin PA administration Byantsog_Uvs2001yahoo.com
7
J. Tomorsukh Local coordinator of project Altai Sayan, Khovsgol region
[email protected] 98380050
8
S. Narantsetseg Khovsgol NCP administration 99760664
9
R. Jamsran Uvs Nuur Basin PA administration 99453121
10
Kh. Dashdendev Environmental Protection Agency, Khovsgol aimag
88385441
11
S. Sukhtsooj Environmental Protection Agency, Khovd aimag
99237004
12
B. Tseveensuren
Ecologist –Engineer, Durgun hydro-power station
[email protected] 99207764
13 A. Tseveen-oidov
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Khovd aimag
99438691
14 B. Gandolgor Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration
98437943
15
G. Bayanmunkh Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration
98437955
16 Kh. Eleuciz Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA 95428947 17 J. Jancerik Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA 98428884 18 I.Sapergul Director of Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA 98429292
19 A. Altai Mongol Altai Nuruu PA
administration [email protected] 99429864
20
G. Amanbek Specialist of Mongol Altai Nuruu PA administration
98424646
21
Kh. Nazgul
Specialist of Mongol Altai Nuruu PA administration
[email protected] 99429696
22
L. Tudev
Director of Govi-Altai Aimag EPA
[email protected] 99489119, 98050419 ажил 24955
10
23
G. Olonbayar Specialist of Govi-altai aimag EPA [email protected] 99687613
24
A. Khasbaatar Specialist of Khar Us Nuur Vicinity PAs’ administration
99474884, 24088
25
D. Erdenechimeg
Specialist of Khar Us Nuur Vicinity PAs’ administration
95438010
26
B. Ganzorig Specialist of Khar Us Nuur Vicinity PAs’ administration
99865221, 88435221 [email protected]
27
A. Askhar Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA administration
28
A. Bauirjan Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA administration
29
T. Enkhtsagaan Driver, Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration
30 N. Batnasan Community based Conservation of
Biodiversity in Altai Sayan Eco-Region
11
Appendix 2 Management Plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region and overall assessment findings & results (quantative results)
Tasks & Activities under assessment
Siilh
em
Alta
i Tav
an B
ogd
Tsam
bvag
arav
Dev
el
Khok
h Se
rkh
Kha
r Us
Nuu
r
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
kh- k
hairk
han
Turg
en
Tsga
aan
shuv
uut
Uvs
Nuu
r
Khan
Khp
hii
Khy
arga
s N
uur
Alta
n E
ls
Ula
an T
aiga
Khor
idol
Sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
Kha
irkha
n
Shar
ga M
ankh
an
Snow leapord 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 Argali sheep 4 4 2 0 4 5 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 Ibex 4 4 2 0 4 4 3 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 4 0 Saiga antelope 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Marmot 4 4 0 0 3 2 1 4 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 3 0 Red deer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Musk deer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 0 Deer 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 2 2 0 3 0 0 2 3 3 3 0 Roe deer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 0 0 Wild pig 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 0 0
Total scores 20 25 15 5 25 30 25 30 25 30 10 20 0 0 30 40 40 25 5 Acquired scores 14 15 5 1 14 18 10 20 17 22 2 7 0 0 9 23 22 14 5
Total (mammals) 70.0 60.0 33.3 20.0 56.0 60.0 40.0 66.7 68.0 73.3 20.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 57.5 55.0 56.0 100.0 Fish 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 Birds 0 3 0 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 2 4 1 2
Faun
a
Other species 0 4 0 0 2 3 3 1 3 3 Rare plants 4 4 1 1 3 5 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 2
Medicinal and other useful plants 4 4 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2
Flor
a
OIthers 3 3 1 2 3
Forests 0 4 4 4 1 2 1 4 5 5 5 5 0 0 2 3 3 3 1 Soil degradation/erosion 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 3 3
Stud
ies/
Res
earc
h on
cur
rent
situ
atio
n
Water & its resources 4 4 4 4 2 1 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 4 3 4
12
Tourism activities & historically & culturally important sites
1 2 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 Total scores 45 65 45 45 65 70 60 70 65 70 50 55 35 35 70 75 80 60 40
Acquired scores 28 28 17 17 31 37 22 43 35 40 22 22 15 11 18 40 47 31 22
Total (in per cent) 62.2 43.1 37.8 37.8 47.7 52.9 36.7 61.4 53.8 57.1 44.0 40.0 42.9 31.4 25.7 53.3 58.8 51.7 55.0 Livelihood of local communities 3 3 3 1 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 4
Population 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 Ecological education of communities 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3
Seasonal movements & settlements of herders (land use practices)
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 2 4
Animal husbandry & overgrazing 3 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 4 5 2 4 2 2 0 4 4 2 3
Illegal hunting 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 2 5 5 5 4 4 4 1 2 2 4 5 Mining 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 5 5 5 5 5 1 0 3 0 1 Tourism 2 2 2 0 0 4 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 3 1
Fire frequency, outbreaks & damages incurred 0 1 0 1 1 4 1 3 5 5 4 4 5 5 2 2 2 2 0
Climate change 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 2 5 5 3 3 2 4 1 1 4 3 3 Infrastructure 3 3 3 3 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3
Forests, woody plants & non-timber forest products 2 4 4 4 2 1 2 3 4 4 3 3 5 4 1 1 2 3 2
Res
earc
h on
pre
ssur
e im
pact
s
Others 2 2 0 0 4 3 0 2 2
Total scores 55 60 50 50 45 55 60 60 55 60 55 55 55 55 45 55 60 55 55
Acquired scores 30 33 31 28 21 41 32 33 46 48 40 42 41 42 16 28 34 29 32
Total (in per cent) 54.5 55.0 62.0 56.0 46.7 74.5 53.3 55.0 83.6 80.0 72.7 76.4 74.5 76.4 35.6 50.9 56.7 52.7 58.2 Community 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 5 5 3 3 2 4 1 4 4 3 5 Resident in vicinity of PAs 3 3 3 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 4 0 4 4 3 5
Other communities 4 4 0 0 3 3 4 5 5 4 0 0 4 1 2 4 Local administrations 2 2 2 1 3 2 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 2 5
Publ
ic a
war
enes
s
Demarcation 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 3 3 4 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 4 Total scores 20 20 15 15 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Acquired scores 8 8 8 5 8 10 11 13 18 18 15 13 13 15 5 16 15 10 19
Act
ivity
r
esul
ts
Total (in per cent) 40.0 40.0 53.3 33.3 40.0 50.0 55.0 65.0 90.0 90.0 75.0 65.0 65.0 75.0 25.0 80.0 75.0 50.0 95.0
13
Poaching 3 3 5 1 3 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 2 3 Arrests of illegal actions 4 4 4 0 3 2 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 2 4 3 3 4
Pastureland use 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 4 5 3 5 3 4 0 4 2 3 3 Zonation & zone regimes 2 3 2 0 2 1 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 2 3
Forests & their non-timber forest products
3 2 4 2 2 2 3 3 5 5 4 4 0 0 4 4 2 2 3
Use of bushyplants 3 2 4 2 3 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 2 Use of basins 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 2 3 4 Mining 4 4 4 0 0 0 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 4 Fires, their causes & measures against them
4 3 4 4 0 2 1 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 3 2 0
Pat
rolli
ng &
mon
itorin
g
Others 3 1 3 0 3 4 0 4 3
Total scores 45 45 45 30 35 40 45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 45 45 45 45
Acquired scores 29 27 32 13 19 15 26 29 44 45 41 43 37 39 20 36 27 19 26 Total (in per cent) 64.4 60.0 71.1 43.3 54.3 37.5 57.8 64.4 97.8 100.0 91.1 95.6 92.5 97.5 50.0 80.0 60.0 42.2 57.8
Community participation in natural resource management
3 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 4 3 3 1 3 2 2 3
Stakeholders’ cooperation 3 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 2 4
External relations 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 0 0 3 3 4
Com
mun
ity
parti
cipa
tion
Others 3 3
Total scores 15 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 15 15 10 10 15 10 10 10 15 15
Acquired scores 9 9 6 3 7 7 6 6 10 15 13 9 8 13 2 7 8 7 11 Total (in per cent) 60.0 60.0 60.0 30.0 70.0 70.0 60.0 60.0 100.0 100.0 86.7 90.0 80.0 86.7 20.0 70.0 80.0 46.7 73.3
Stability of staff members in their employment
4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 4 4 4
Training & re-training 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 4 5 5 5 5 2 5 1 4 4 2 5
Educational background of employees
3 3 3 1 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 3 2 3
Human resources 3 3 3 1 2 3 4 4 5 3 3 5 3 4 1 4 4 2 5 Issuance of inspector’s power 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3
Man
agem
ent
Professional skills 3 3 3 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3
14
Rangers’ skills & abilities 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 1 4 3 3 3
Others 2 Total scores 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Acquired scores 18 18 18 7 17 18 19 27 28 26 26 29 22 27 10 26 23 18 26 Total (in per cent) 51.4 51.4 51.4 20.0 48.6 51.4 54.3 77.1 80.0 74.3 74.3 82.9 62.9 77.1 28.6 74.3 65.7 51.4 74.3
Tele-communication 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 1 1 3 4 4 1 5 5 2 5
Transport means 2 2 2 0 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 5 3 5 5 2 5
Self defence means 3 3 3 0 2 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 1 4 4 2 1
Ranger’s sets 1 2 1 1 1 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 1 2 4 4 4 3 5
Equipment supplies in working areas
2 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 5 5 5 3 3 Tech
nica
l sup
plie
s
Others 1 Budget sufficiency 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 Supports from projects, programs, & other sources
2 2 2 0 1 2 3 3 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 0 4
Tourism 2 4 2 0 1 1 1 3 3 2 4 2 2 1 2 2 5 2 0 Incomes from activities 4 4 1 0 4 4 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 2 0
Mat
eria
l res
ourc
es, b
udge
t & fi
nanc
e
Inco
mes
Others 1 0 0 4 Total scores 45 45 45 15 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 40 35
Acquired scores 19 22 16 3 17 30 22 29 27 27 25 21 24 23 23 36 42 20 27 Total (in per cent)
42.2 48.9 35.6 20.0 37.8 66.7 48.9 64.4 60.0 60.0 55.6 46.7 53.3 51.1 51.1 80.0 93.3 50.0 77.1
Forestation 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 3 3 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 Biotechnical measures 3 3 3 0 3 3 4 4 5 5 3 3 2 2 1 4 3 1 2
Res
tora
tion
Protection of water upper sources 2 3 2 0 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 2 3
Total scores 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Acquired scores 5 11 5 0 6 7 9 11 12 10 11 11 3 6 5 8 7 6 6
Total (in per cent) 33.3 73.3 33.3 0.0 40.0 46.7 60.0 73.3 80.0 66.7 73.3 73.3 20.0 40.0 33.3 53.3 46.7 40.0 40.0
OVERALL SCORES 51.0 54.0 50.6 30.1 48.1 56.2 53.2 65.1 80.7 78.5 71.6 71.2 61.4 66.9 33.7 67.7 67.0 48.1 66.3
15
Appendix 3
Management Plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region and overall assessment findings & results (1. Management plan issues & 2. Protected Areas)
Research
53.7% 62.3%
46.3% 37.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Research on currentsituation
Research on pressureimpacts
Research on current situation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khe
m
Alta
i Ta
van
Bo
gd
Tsa
mb
ag
ara
v
De
be
l
Kh
okh
Se
rkh
Kh
ar
Us
Mya
ng
an
Ug
alz
at
Mu
nkh
kha
irkh
an
Tu
rge
n
Tsa
ga
an
Sh
uvu
ut
Uvs
nu
ur
Kh
an
kho
khii
Kh
yarg
as
nu
ur
Alta
n e
ls
Ula
an
Ta
iga
Kh
ori
do
l sa
rid
ag
Kh
ovs
go
l
Kh
asa
gt
kha
irkh
an
Sh
arg
a M
an
ha
n
Research on current situation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khe
m
Alta
i Ta
van
Bo
gd
Tsa
mb
ag
ara
v
De
be
l
Kh
okh
Se
rkh
Kh
ar
Us
Mya
ng
an
Ug
alz
at
Mu
nkh
kha
irkh
an
Tu
rge
n
Tsa
ga
an
Sh
uvu
ut
Uvs
nu
ur
Kh
an
kho
khii
Kh
yarg
as
nu
ur
Alta
n e
ls
Ula
an
Ta
iga
Kh
ori
do
l sa
rid
ag
Kh
ovs
go
l
Kh
asa
gt
kha
irkh
an
Sh
arg
a M
an
ha
n
16
Research on Fauna
41.5%
72.7%61.5%
100.0%
53.3%40.0%
60.0%
45.5% 48.0%36.0% 40.0% 44.7%
58.5%
27.3%38.5%
0.0%
46.7%60.0%
40.0%
54.5% 52.0%64.0% 60.0% 55.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Sno
w le
apor
d
Arg
ali s
heep
Ibex
Sai
ga a
ntel
ope
Mar
mot
Red
dee
r
Mus
k de
er
Dee
r
Roe
dee
r
Wild
pig
Fis
h
Bird
s
Research on Mammals
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
17
Research on pressure impacts
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Research on pressure impacts
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Public awareness
61.1%72.2% 67.3%
45.5%
38.9%27.8% 32.7%
54.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Com
mun
ity
Res
iden
t in
vici
nity
of
PA
s
Loca
lad
min
istr
atio
ns
Dem
arca
tion
18
Public awareness
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh
Ser
kh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuu
t
Uv
s nu
ur
Kh
ankh
okhi
i
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n e
ls
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
rido
l sa
ridag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kh
asag
tkh
airk
han
Sha
rga
Ma
nhan
Public awareness
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh
Ser
kh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuu
t
Uv
s nu
ur
Kh
ankh
okhi
i
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n e
ls
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
rido
l sa
ridag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kh
asag
tkh
airk
han
Sha
rga
Ma
nhan
Patrolling & monitoring
71.6% 76.7%60.0% 63.3% 63.5%
71.6% 70.5%88.0%
75.3%
28.4% 23.3%40.0% 36.7% 36.5%
28.4% 29.5%12.0%
24.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Poa
chin
g
Arr
ests
of i
llega
lac
tions
Pas
ture
land
use
Zon
atio
n &
zon
ere
gim
es
For
ests
& th
eir
non-
timbe
rfo
rest
pro
duct
s
Use
of
bush
ypla
nts
Use
of b
asin
s
Min
ing
Fire
s, th
eir
caus
es &
mea
sure
sag
ains
t the
m
19
Patrolling & monitoring
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Patrolling & monitoring
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Patrolling & monitoring
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Community participation
60.0% 71.6% 80.0%
40.0% 28.4% 20.0%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Community participation in natural resourcemanagement
Stakeholders’ cooperation External relations
20
Community participation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Community participation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Management
81.0%63.1% 63.1% 65.2%
29.4%
68.4%53.6%
19.0%36.9% 36.9% 34.8%
70.6%
31.6%46.4%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Sta
bilit
y o
f st
aff
mem
bers
in t
heir
empl
oym
ent
Tra
inin
g &
re-
trai
ning
Edu
catio
nal b
ackg
roun
d of
empl
oyee
s
Hum
an r
esou
rces
Issu
ance
of
insp
ecto
r’spo
wer
Pro
fess
iona
l ski
lls
Ran
gers
’ ski
lls &
abi
litie
s
-
21
Material resources, budget & finance
48.4%
78.9%63.3%
51.6% 48.4% 51.8% 45.9% 45.9%
51.6%
21.1%36.7%
48.4% 51.6% 48.2% 54.1% 54.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Tel
e-co
mm
unic
atio
n
Tra
nspo
rtm
eans
Sel
f de
fenc
em
eans
Ran
ger’s
set
s
Equ
ipm
ent
supp
lies
inw
orki
ng a
reas
Sup
port
s fr
ompr
ojec
ts,
prog
ram
s, &
othe
r so
urce
s
Inco
mes
fro
mto
uris
m
Inco
mes
fro
mac
tiviti
es
Material resources, budget & finance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
Material resources, budget & finance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siilk
hem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
22
Restoration
50.9% 60.0% 63.3%
49.1% 40.0% 36.7%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Forestation Biotechnical measures Protection of waterupper sources
Restoration
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han
23
OVERALL SCORES
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Siil
khem
Alta
i Tav
anB
ogd
Tsa
mba
gara
v
Deb
el
Kho
kh S
erkh
Kha
r U
s
Mya
ngan
Uga
lzat
Mun
khkh
airk
han
Tur
gen
Tsa
gaan
Shu
vuut
Uvs
nuu
r
Kha
nkho
khii
Khy
arga
s nu
ur
Alta
n el
s
Ula
an T
aiga
Kho
ridol
sar
idag
Kho
vsgo
l
Kha
sagt
khai
rkha
n
Sha
rga
Man
han