IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ESOURCING TOOL IN A GREENFIELD ORGANISATION€¦ · IMPLEMENTATION OF AN...
Transcript of IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ESOURCING TOOL IN A GREENFIELD ORGANISATION€¦ · IMPLEMENTATION OF AN...
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ESOURCING TOOL IN A
GREENFIELD ORGANISATION
eWorld
27-09-2016
Ilse Claus (Group Procurement Manager)\
1
Agenda
• Short Introduction to Milcobel
• Procurement: Where do we come from?
• E-Sourcing Tool: Why? Expected Benefits
• Challenges in the Implementation Process
• Stakeholder Challenges and their Feedback to the Tool
• Current status – Realised Benefits
• Taking eSourcing to the Next Level: Strategies to be
depolyed over the next 12 months to maximise results
Milk. Our craftmanship, our future
Short Introduction to Milcobel
Procurement: Where do we come from?
E-Sourcing Tool: Why? Expected Benefits
Challenges in the Implementation Process
Stakeholder challenges and their feedback
regarding the tool
Current Status - Realised Benefits
Taking eSourcing to the Next Level:
Strategies to maximise results
Questions & Answers
AGENDA
2
Short Introduction to Milcobel
3
Key Figures 2015
Belgium’s n°1 dairy company
Annual turnover: approximately € 1 billion
Annual milk collection: approximately 1,2 billion litres
(actual 2016 = 1,4 billion litres)
Cooperative owner structure: 2,700 dairy farmers
(+300 ex-RFC since 1 February 2016)
Specialised in: cheese (consumer & industrial), powder, butter and
cream, liquid dairy products, ice cream
Ca. 2,000 employees
8 locations
4
Situation vs Target
5
Procurement Milcobel Dairy: < 2015
•
• No Transparency
• Reactive
• Ad hoc
• Acceptance of the situation
• Purchasing: Everyone in the
organisation
• Only operational purchasing –
‘serve the factory’
• Visibility
• Proactivity
• Right balance: e.g., quality versus cost
• Central approach
• Dedicated Category Buyers
• Courage to change
• Procurement involved at right time
• Cross-functional approach
GAP
SITUATION < 2015 TARGET
HOW TO CLOSE THE GAP?
• Spend Map
• Choose your battles
• Contracts/Procedures in place
• Tools in place
• Training - Professionalise
• Show value: gain trust
• Setting right expectations
6
Procurement Milcobel Dairy: Today Tomorrow
Maturity Levels of a Procurement Organisation – Van Weele
7
E-Sourcing Tool: Why?
8
E-Sourcing Tool: Why? (1)
• Admin workload
Easy follow up of RFQ
Fixed deadline
Send reminders via system
Follow up if supplier has logged in and submitted their offer
Q&A via platform
Uniform quotations
Force supplier to answer in your way
Consolidation of answers by the system – system summarizes results
Historic data available on one platform
Start from another exercise – no need to start from scratch
Acceptance by supplier prior exercise: NDA, T&C, etc.
9
As a method to force category buyers in the agreed workflow
From making a phone call to the known supplier professional RFQ with several suppliers
Invite internal stakeholders to follow RFQ
Transparency
Create trust and buy-in
Increase credibility
Remote follow-up possible
Category buyers working from different locations, online follow up of RFQs possible by Procurement
Manager
E-Sourcing Tool: Why? (2)
10
Challenges in The
Implementation Process
11
Procurement team without experience
No experience with an
e-sourcing toolNo procurement
experience in general
E-Sourcing Tool: Challenges in the Implementation
Process (1)
Challenges within Procurement
Is this tool really helping save time?
12
E-Sourcing Tool: Challenges in the Implementation
Process (2)
Stakeholder challenges and their
feedback regarding the tool
‘’Doing e-Auctions is not
fair towards suppliers’’
‘’You can use eSourcing for other categories
But not this one as it is VERY special and more
complex than others!’’
“There is only one supplier
who can deliver what
we need’’
‘’All information visible to invited stakeholders
• Also downsides > clear framework
necessary’’
13
Current status with Procurement
Team, Processes and Tools
14
Current Status With Procurement Team, Processes
and Tools
Procurement Team Milcobel Dairy
Routine in organising RFQs and using the e-sourcing tool
60% of the addressed spend via Scanmarket (4/2015-5/2016 – 29 mio €)
o eSourcing system even used for RFIs in order to update master
data, update specifications, etc.
First e-Auctions done with good results
Other tools
Contract templates ready
ERP re-setup: project defined
Procedures described – implementation soon
Mintec: market intelligence
Reporting
36
Current status – realised benefits
Approximately 25% time saved on
average tender process• Less need for face to face
meetings, less mail follow
up, etc.
E-sourcing platform as a tool to
help implementing a workflow More transparency than
traditional processes
Realised savings of the RFQs
done via Scanmarket• 17% costs savings in
average
37
Taking eSourcing to the Next Level
Aim to achieve:
Greater Savings
Greater credibility
Greater visibility
Greater efficiency
Greater compliance
More spend under management
38
Greater Savings - eAuctions
Direct correlation between number of suppliers and savings generated:
for every extra supplier taking part in an English Reverse eAuction there
is an average further 1.1% saving (cut-off point 8 suppliers)
On average only 75% of suppliers invited to take part actually will take
part, therefore always invite a larger number than your target number
Scanmarket:
Analysis of tens of thousands of eAuctions
17 years’ experience
Advanced Strategies training:
39
When to use eAuctions
Use of eAuctions should be limited to commoditised products only
WRONG!
1) Scanmarket’s 3C model:
Compelling Spend
Competition
Clear Specifications
40
When to use eAuctions
Non-critical: Low complexity/Low Category spend -
Utilize eAuction tools to run negotiations with suppliers
with a minimum of time and resource consumption
Leverage: Low complexity/High Category spend -
Utilise eAuctions to exploit the market, as you have
both buying power and a large spend to operate with
Bottleneck: High complexity/Low Category spend –
First priority is to minimise the risk, which should be
considered prior to the utilisation of any eAuction tool
Strategic: High complexity/High Category spend -
Large spend which could be exploited, however in-
depth strategy analysis should be made to make sure
the high complexity is taken into account
Best Practice companies utilise the eAuction tool for all categories within
Krajlic’s Portfolio model – and not just the easy “Leverage” products:
41
Which type to use
2) Correct type of eAuction must be used and set up correctly
English Reverse
Japanese
Dutch
...an eAuction is an eAuction is an eAuction - WRONG!
42
eAuctions Continued…
Japanese eAuctions:
Suppliers siloed
No visibility of the activity/presence of any other supplier
All start off with an opening bid (importantly, starting prices can be
completely different from each other’s)
Suppliers invited to accept lower and lower bids, suggested by the system
(set decrements and time interval between bids defined by supplier).
Once supplier fails to accept X bids in a row, they are out of the eAuction
Perfect for:
• competition is low - even if there is only one supplier
• suppliers are offering products/services that differ considerably in quality/cost
• strategic categories
• where company has a strong preference for a particular supplier
• when buyer is sourcing – not taking best bid as final decision
43
eAuctions Continued….
Dutch eAuctions:
Start off with the same starting bid (15-30% lower than RFQ price)
System will suggest higher and higher bids (again set increments and
time intervals are defined by buyers)
First supplier to accept a bid wins the eAuction
High pressure eAuction for suppliers and yield’s amazing results
Ensure participants are approved suppliers only
Perfect for:
• Equally qualified suppliers but no competition (e.g., where one
supplier’s bid is 10%+ lower than other bidders)
• Perfect for allocating specific projects to framework suppliers
• Commoditised products/services where there is no preference
44
Supplier activity
Sounds obvious, but the more supplier activity, the greater the savings.
Therefore, aim to maximise supplier activity by:
Communication
Preparation
Training/Conditioning
Functionality
Use of Scanmarket’s traffic light system:
not winning, winning, and to indicate close (within a pre-defined percentage
to the best current bid)
Chat function
45
Advanced functionality- eRFx and eAuctions
Build all pertinent parameters into both eRFx and eAuctions:
Suppliers are happy that other factors other than price are being taken into
consideration
Give long-standing excellent suppliers an advantage by adding a switching cost
levy to other suppliers
To maintain supplier relationships and to
ensure best overall value is achieved:
Quality differences
Service levels
Lead time
Warranty
To calculate TCO:
Rebates
Transportation
Other charges
46
Advanced functionality – eRFx and
eAuctions continued ….
Scanmarket’s dynamic parameters:
eRFx
Suppliers can select payment terms and enter their best price.
The system will add pre-defined levies based upon the option
they have selected:
E.g., 3 payment term options 30, 60, 90 days
30 days = +2%, 60 days = +1%, 90 days = +0%
eAuction
Suppliers can, in real-time, change payment terms, lead time,
etc., and their current and future bids will be amended accordingly based upon the pre-defined levies
47
Other reasons for eAuctions
Contrary to popular belief, eAuctions are not solely used to
generate savings. They are also used for:
Avoiding cost increases
Quickly and easily determining true market value
Bolstering and diversifying your supply chain (get 2nd and 3rd
choice suppliers to improve pricing for future dealings)
50
Ramping up use of eAuctions
Together with Scanmarket, we have identified that
65% of our sourcing projects planned for the next 12
months are suitable for eAuctions, based upon the 3C
model
As we are able to quickly transfer the info from the
eRFx module straight into the eAuction module, we
can very easily run those eAuctions without impacting
resource
51
Please stop by the stand to pick up a copy of the
presentation:
All slides from today’s presentation
Plus bonus slides covering more advanced
eSourcing strategies we plan to deploy to achieve:
Greater efficiency
Greater compliance
Greater visibility
Greater level of spend under management
52
Thank you for listening