Impact of Smoothness on Fuel Efficiency · 2019. 9. 16. · •Roughness of tire and road...

23
Impact of Smoothness on Fuel Efficiency National Center for Asphalt Technology

Transcript of Impact of Smoothness on Fuel Efficiency · 2019. 9. 16. · •Roughness of tire and road...

  • Impact of Smoothness on Fuel Efficiency

    National Center for Asphalt Technology

  • Overview

    • Background

    • Objectives

    • Factors Affecting Rolling Resistance (RR)

    • Pavement Properties Affecting RR

    • Conclusions

    2

  • Fuel Economy

    • Vehicle aerodynamics (wind resistance)

    • Engine efficiency (internal resistance)

    • Tire-road contact (rolling resistance)

    3

  • Effect of Vehicle Speed

    • 30 mph

    – Rolling Resistance: 50%

    – Internal Friction: 25%

    – Air Drag: 25%

    • 60 mph

    – Rolling Resistance: 30%

    – Internal Friction: 20%

    – Air Drag: 50%

    4

  • Objective and Scope

    • What pavement properties have greatest influence on rolling resistance & fuel economy?

    • Synthesis of prior research and simulations

    • 20+ studies included in literature review

    • Experience on NCAT Pavement Test Track

    5

  • Rolling Resistance

    • Force required to keep an object (i.e. wheel or tire) moving

    – Energy losses on pavement surface

    – Internal friction loses

    – Energy losses from tire deformation

    6

  • Factors Affecting Rolling Resistance

    • Material composition of tire

    • Tire’s geometry

    • Road composition

    • Roughness of tire and road

    • Ambient air temperature

    • Vehicle speed

    • Tire pressure

    7

  • Factors Affecting Rolling Resistance

    • Material composition of tire

    • Tire’s geometry

    • Road composition

    • Roughness of tire and road

    • Ambient air temperature

    • Vehicle speed

    • Tire pressure

    8

  • Pavement Properties Affecting RR

    • Pavement Type

    • Deformation

    • Smoothness

    • Texture

    9

  • Pavement Type

    Pavement Type

    Rolling Resistance Coefficient

    Concrete 0.010 – 0.020

    Asphalt 0.012 – 0.022

    Dirt 0.025 – 0.037

    Sand 0.060 – 0.150

    • Asphalt and concrete had similar rolling resistance coefficients

    • Dirt and sand roadways are less fuel efficient than flexible and rigid pavements

    10

    Walter and Conant (1974)

  • Pavement Deformation

    • Deformation = Energy Loss

    – Tire and Pavement

    • Modeling

    – Two springs in a series

    – Effective stiffness dominated by softer material

    11

  • Pavement Deformation

    • Pavement versus tire stiffness

    • Energy lost from pavement deflection

  • Pavement Smoothness

    • International Roughness Index (IRI)

    – Driver perceived roughness

    • How does smoothness affect rolling resistance/fuel economy?

    • Affects wear and energy loss in shock absorbers

    13

  • Effect on Rolling Resistance

    • Road 1

    • Vehicle Speed: 50 mph

    • IRI: 60 in/mile

    • RR Coefficient: 0.012

    • Road 2

    • Vehicle Speed: 50 mph

    • IRI: 120 in/mile

    • RR Coefficient: 0.01272

    • 6% increase in rolling resistance

    14

  • Effect on Fuel Economy

    • Rolling Resistance versus Fuel Economy

    – 10% increase in RR = 3-4% reduction in fuel economy

    • At 60 mph, passenger vehicles

    – 1.8 to 2.4% increase in fuel economy

    • WesTrack

    – 10% reduction in IRI

    – 4.5% reduction in fuel consumption

    15

  • Pavement Texture

    • Affects energy loss due to wear and small scale tire contact

    • Megatexture

    – 50 mm – 500 mm

    • Macrotexture

    – 0.5mm – 50 mm

    • Microtexture

    – < 0.5 mm

    16

  • Effect on Rolling Resistance

    • Road 1

    • Vehicle Speed: 30 mph

    • MPD: 0.5 mm

    • RR Coefficient: 0.012

    • Road 2

    • Vehicle Speed: 30 mph

    • MPD: 1.5 mm

    • RR Coefficient: 0.01404

    • 17% increase in rolling resistance

    17

    5.1% increase in fuel economy

  • Effect on Fuel Economy

    • Sandberg (1990)

    • Testing parameters

    – Volvo 242

    – Twenty road surfaces

    – Three speeds

    • Macrotexture = 5% change in fuel economy

    18

  • Effect on Rolling Resistance

    • Road 1

    • Vehicle Speed: 60 mph

    • MPD: 0.5 mm

    • RR Coefficient: 0.012

    • Road 2

    • Vehicle Speed: 60 mph

    • MPD: 1.5 mm

    • RR Coefficient: 0.0156

    • 30% increase in rolling resistance

    19

    9% increase in fuel economy

  • Most Influential Parameters

    • At low speeds

    – Smoothness and megatexture

    • At high speeds

    – Smoothness, megatexture, and macrotexture

    • Smoothness and texture have most overall influence

    20

  • Conclusions

    • Stiffness plays minimal importance in rolling resistance and fuel economy

    • Smooth pavements can increase fuel economy between 1.8 and 4.5%

    – More???

    • Limiting texture could improve fuel economy

    – Magnitude depends on speed

    21

  • NCAT Pavement Test Track

    22

  • Questions ?

    23