Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker...
-
Upload
cori-garrett -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker...
Impact of Early Dark Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear Energy on non-linear structure formation structure formation
Margherita GrossiMargherita GrossiMPA, Garching
Advisor : Volker SpringelVolker Springel
3rd Biennial Leopoldina Conference on Dark Energy
LMU Munich, 10 October 2008
Early darkEarly dark energy models energy models
Parametrization in terms of three Parametrization in terms of three parameters parameters (Wetterich 2004)(Wetterich 2004) : :
Flat universe :Flat universe :
Fitting formula :Fitting formula :
Effective contribution during structure Effective contribution during structure formation :formation :
(see Bartelmann’s Talk)(see Bartelmann’s Talk)
Current predictions for EDE Current predictions for EDE
Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)
Geometry of the universe: distance, time reduced
)(
1
0 aaE
da
Ht
)(2 aEa
daDcom
redshift zredshift zCos
mic
tim
e re
lati
ve t
o L
CD
MC
osm
ic t
ime
rela
tive
to
LC
DM
Current predictions for EDE Current predictions for EDE
Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)
Geometry of the universe: distance, time reduced
Spherical collapse model: virial overdensity moderately changed, linear overdensity significantly reduced
The ‘Top Hat Model’ : The ‘Top Hat Model’ : uniform, spherical perturbationuniform, spherical perturbation i
oOverdensity within virialized halos Overdensity within virialized halos
oOverdensity linearly extrapolated Overdensity linearly extrapolated toto
collapse densitycollapse density
vir
inic zD )(
collapsecollapse redshift zredshift zcc
vir
Current predictions for EDE Current predictions for EDE
Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)
Geometry of the universe: distance, time reduced
Mass function: increase in the abundance of dark matter halos at high-z
Spherical collapse model: virial overdensity moderately changed, linear overdensity significantly reduced
dn/dM (M, z)
At any given redshift, we can compute the probability of living in a place with (PS)
2
2
2exp
2),(
ccPSf
Current predictions for EDE Current predictions for EDE
Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)
Geometry of the universe: distance, time reduced
Mass function: increase in the abundance of dark matter halos at high-z
Halo properties: concentration increased
Spherical collapse model: virial overdensity moderately changed, linear overdensity significantly reduced
Concentration parameter :Concentration parameter :
s
virvir R
Rc
Halos density profile have roughly self similar form Halos density profile have roughly self similar form
2)/1)(/(
)(
ss
c
crit RrRr
r
(NFW)(NFW)
Current predictions for EDE Current predictions for EDE
Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)Bartelmann, Doran, Wetterich (2006)
Simulations are necessary to interpret Simulations are necessary to interpret observational results and compare them with observational results and compare them with
theoretical modelstheoretical models
Geometry of the universe: distance, time reduced
Mass function: increase in the abundance of dark matter halos at high-z
Halo properties: concentration increased
Spherical collapse model: virial overdensity moderately changed, linear overdensity significantly reduced
N-Body SimulationsN-Body Simulations
• ΛCDM
• DECDM
• EDE1
• EDE2
Models :Models :
• 5123 particles, mp 5 *10 9 solar masses
• L=1003 (Mpc/h)3 , softening length of 4.2 kpc/h
Resolution requirements:Resolution requirements:
• N-GenIC (IC) + P-Gadget3 (simulation) ( C + MPI)
• 128 processors on OPA at at RZGRZG (Garching) (Garching) Computation requests :Computation requests :
Codes:Codes:
From the Friedmann equations:From the Friedmann equations:
Expansion function Expansion function
Growth factorGrowth factor
Structures need to grow Structures need to grow earlier in EDE models in earlier in EDE models in order to reach the same order to reach the same
level todaylevel today
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
FoF FoF
b=0.2b=0.2
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
Constant initial Constant initial density contrastdensity contrast
z = 0.z = 0.
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
z = 0.25z = 0.25
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
z = 0.5z = 0.5
z = 0.75z = 0.75
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
z = 1.z = 1.
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
z = 1.5z = 1.5
z = 2.z = 2.
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
z = 3.z = 3.
The mass function of DM haloes The mass function of DM haloes
Theoretical MFs Theoretical MFs ~ ~ 5-15% errors 5-15% errors
(0<z<5)(0<z<5)
Do we need a modified virial Do we need a modified virial overdensity for EDE ?overdensity for EDE ?
Introduction of the linear density contrast predicted by BDW Introduction of the linear density contrast predicted by BDW for EDE models worsens the fit!for EDE models worsens the fit!
%%
Spherical overdensity (SO)
The virial mass is :
3lim3
4rM critvir
Friends-of-friends (FOF) b=0.2
The concentration-mass relationThe concentration-mass relationHalo selections: >3000 particles Halo selections: >3000 particles • Substructure mass fraction Substructure mass fraction
• Centre of mass displacementCentre of mass displacement
• Virial ratioVirial ratio
1.0subf
07.0/ vircmc rrrs
35.1/2 UT
EDE halos always more EDE halos always more concentratedconcentrated
Profile fittingProfile fitting• Uniform radial range for density Uniform radial range for density profile profile
• More robust fit from maximum in More robust fit from maximum in the profilethe profile2r
5.2)/(log0 10 virrr
Eke et al. (2001) works Eke et al. (2001) works for EDE without for EDE without
modificationsmodifications
DM2[km/sec]2
Substructures in CDM haloes Substructures in CDM haloes
Cumulative velocity Cumulative velocity dispersion function dispersion function
from sub-halos from sub-halos dynamicsdynamics
Robust quantity against Robust quantity against richness threshold.richness threshold.
N(>
DM
2 ) [
h-1M
pc]3
sec/300kmSH
ConclusionsConclusions Higher cluster populations at high z for EDE models: Higher cluster populations at high z for EDE models:
linear growth behaviourlinear growth behaviour and power spectrum analysis and power spectrum analysis Halo-formation time: trend in Halo-formation time: trend in concentrationconcentration for EDE halos for EDE halos Possibility of putting cosmological constraints on equation Possibility of putting cosmological constraints on equation
of state parameter: of state parameter: cumulative velocity distribution cumulative velocity distribution functionfunction
Connection between mass and galaxy velocity Connection between mass and galaxy velocity dispersion: dispersion: virial relationvirial relation for massive dark matter halos for massive dark matter halos
Constant density contrast (spherical collapse theory for Constant density contrast (spherical collapse theory for EDE models): EDE models): mass functionmass function
Probing Dark Energy is one of the major Probing Dark Energy is one of the major challenge for the computational cosmologychallenge for the computational cosmology