Impact of Attrition on the Call Center
-
Upload
knowlagent -
Category
Business
-
view
2.015 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Impact of Attrition on the Call Center
Impact of Attrition Benchmark Study Results from August 2007 Survey
Impact of Attrition Survey
Request sent to Knowlagent internal database via email251 responses
Number of Agents
33.3%Less than 100
27.2%101-300
10.6%301-500
11.7%501-1000
17.2%More than 1000
Title Breakdown
Director22%
VP18%
Other19%
Unknown3%
Manager38%
Organizational GoalsPlease select the category that most closely matches that of the most
important goals in your call center.
Revenue/Sales related 15.6%
Customer satisfaction related40.2%Customer loyalty related 4.5%
Quality related 8.6%
Cost related 3.3%
Customer experience related22.1%Net promoter related 0.8%
Other (please specify) 4.9%
Organization's Success Towards Most Important Goal
Met the goal36%
Exceeded the goal25%
Did not meet goal4%
Partially met the goal35%
68% of goals arecustomer satisfaction, loyalty or experience-related.
39% of respondents were partially or completely unsuccessful against their highest stated goal.
Ranking Challenges to Goal Achievement
What are the key obstacles to achieving the goal? (all that apply)
Not enough budget 19.3%
Not enough resources 37.7%
Other goal(s) in conflict 23.8%
Organizational alignment 21.7%
Other 14.3%
Agents not the right personality fit 29.5%
Agents without right skills and knowledge
41.0%
Agent attrition 52.5%
Attrition ranks the highest. Other issues addressable via hiring processes also stand out – personality and skill mismatches.
Impact of Attrition
Impact of Attrition on Achieving Goals
Gets in the way of success
70%
Has little effect on success
13%
Doesn’t affect success at all
2% Major reason for lack of success
15%
Attrition significantly impacts success at 85% of companies.
Attrition Across the Agent Lifecycle
When reporting on attrition at different stages, respondents typically reported lower numbers than what would be expected when reviewing the overall attrition percentages.
3629 24 26
41
13
20
1819
27
19
21
1419
2012 3
20
9 1312 8
5 17
4 68
53
16
17 15 17 2229
13
New hiretraining
Less than 90days on the
floor
90 days to 1year
1-3 years More than 3years
Overallattrition
Do not track
>50%
31-50%
21-30%
11-20%
0-10%
Why does attrition occur?
Rank order the top 3 reasons for attrition.
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
The agent leaves to make more money
The job is not what the agent expected
The agent isn’t a good personality fit for the job
The agent does not have the right knowledgeand skills to perform the job
The agent does not have a clear career path foradvancement
Other
The agent has a poor relationship with thesupervisor
Number 1Number 2Number 3
While increasing salary is selected most often as the cause of attrition, the most highly ranked reason is related to unclear job expectations. When Number 1 and Number 2 rankings are combined, increased salary, unclear expectations and personality fit appear to be equal contributors to attrition.
Battling Attrition
Rating Method Effectiveness Against Attrition
11
17
19
19
11
12
13
23
50
40
40
36
30
21
34
22
29
26
27
34
35
6
5
7
7
7
13
13
3
1
1
1
2
22
7
5
8
19
11
16
Using assessment tools for hiring
Improving new hire training and nesting
Increasing training and communications to existing agents
Implementing supervisor-agent coaching programs forexisting agents
Improving/Creating mentoring programs
Focusing on career growth opportunities
Increasing salaries
Very effective Effective Somewhat effective Not very effective Not effective at all Method not in use
The methods most reported as effective against attrition are improving new hire training and nesting, increasing training and communications and implementing coaching programs.
Success Over the Long Haul
Rate Long-Term Effectiveness Against Attrition
31%Lowered and stayed at or near that level.
10%Lowered initially and
more since then.20%Have not addressed.
13%Unsuccessful in
lowering.
26%Lowered temporarily
but has since increased.
While 41 percent have had success lowering attrition and at least keeping it steady, 39 percent have either been unsuccessful or were unable to sustain results.
Where would the savings go?
Applying Cost Savings From Lowering Attrition
Apply towards the bottom line
33%
Invest in highest stated goal
49%
Invest in secondary goal(s)18%
Most respondents would take costs saved from attrition reduction and apply towards their most important goal.
About Knowlagent
Knowlagent has enabled companies around the world to manage call center agents for 13 years.
HiringTrainingCommunicationsCoaching
Easy to use on-demand softwareNo capital expendituresDeployable in 30 daysAccessible via the WebEnabling more companies to optimize frontline performance faster and more affordably than ever before.
For more info: [email protected]