ImNAT SnAT.-t- - SCOTUSblog

295

ImNAT SnAT.-t-

ADDENDUM TO UNITED STATES SENATE

OURSTION I 1S.:

Al.

Came Dasaotion: Represented Ferrari North America in anadministrative hearing, ordered pursuant to awrit of mandate, of dealer's petitionchallenging the termination of his Ferrarifranchise under California's AutomobileFranchise Law. I predominantly conducted thehearing before the California New MotorVehicle Board which confirmed thetermination.

Ferrari North America appealed the Judgmentrendered on the writ, which judgment wasreversed on appeal. The appeal addressed theissue whether a Stipulation of Settlemententered into before the California New MotorVehicle Board could be enforced, without agood cause hearing, to terminate a dealer.

Although not listed as co-counsel forappellant's briefs, I had significantdrafting input into the briefs. Theappellate case was entitled xi 2fSacramento. Inc. B Rondeat v. New MotorVehicle Board a _d Sam iD _$_= AnAnvel ts. and Frrarj orth AericaE.BdlParty in Interes' and Appel ln; No. C00P840in the Court of Appeal of the State ofCalifornia in and for the 3rd AppellatcDistrict; Sacramento Superior Court, Case No.360734. See below for the names, addressesand telephone numbers of co-counsel andadversaries).

_E.O...liIK.9: Ferrari of Sacramento. Inc. vs. Ferrari north

State of California New Motor Vehicle Board(Appeared 2_ n Yhi-_2)

it 2: PR-973-88

~~og42 M?-

-5- MTUEUT.2W

Dates of searing:

Case Deupariptin:

CA=r:

Robert S. KendellMarilyn Kong

10/16/90, 10/17/90, 10/31/90, 11/1/90, and11/2/90

Nicholas Browning, III, Esq.Herzfeld & Rubin1925 Century Park East, Suite 600Los Angeles, California 90067-2783(213) 553-0451

Jay-Allen EisenJay-Allen Eisen Law Corporation1000 G Street, Suite 300Sacramento, California 95814(916) 444-6171

Donald M. Licker, Esq.701 University Avenue, Suite 100Sacramento, California 95825(916) 924-9600

Represented Ferrari North America, pxQ h=y&, a franchisor of bankrupt dealer inhearings relating to Ferrari's opposition tothe rejection of customer contracts,assumption of the dealer's franchiseagreement and confirmation of the proposedsale of dealer's franchise. The Court ruledthat the dealer could not reject customercontracts, although financially burdensome,and then assume franchise agreement.

Case subsequentJy settled with sale ofdealership and resolution of claims amongdealer, new buyer, Ferrari and customers.

Van Ness Arni-a9R a d/!a Aut la Lincolni y._U Ato Plaza Porsche andA P

Ferraris De029ZL

United States Bankruptcy Court, NorthernDistrict of California.

.1

4,

CAUL1E:

Ooocounse3.:

A3 - A59Vuera!Des orpIk ;

A3.Caa c, Deo_wcJ&onm.

C§ase N:

WIAlIE U.EST.-3-

3-89-03450-TC

Thomas E. CarlsonU.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge

1/22/90 and 3/19/90

Nicholas Browning, III, Esq.Herzfeld & Rubin1925 Century Park East, Suite 600Los Angeles, California 90067-2783(213) 553--0451

Henry Cohen, Esq.Cohen and JacobsonAttorneys for Debtor577 Airport Blvd., Suite 230Burlington, California 94010(415) 342-6601

William Kelly, Esq.Graham & JamesAttorneys for Buyer, Barry SinghOne Maritime Plaza, Suite 300San Francisco, California 94111(415) 954-0200

Since 1985, my firm has represented FendiS.a.s. di Paola Fendi e Sorelle ("Fendi") inits national anti-counterfeiting work.Frances B. Bernstein, a deceased partner ofmy firm, and I created Fendi's program.Since 1988, I have been the partner in chargeof that program. I have handled almost alldiscovery work and substantive courtappearances in cases involving Fendi. Thefollowing are cases representative of variousfacets of this work.

Multiple provisional relief appearancesrelating to Lanham Act claims against streetvendors.

janPoe v. John Doe and Various ABCCoMPanies.

2W7

* 4;7~<~ ~

298

lat0S M.ENAE *=I.-4-

,-) Civ. 3122 (TPG)

United States District CourtSouthern District of New York

Thomas P. Griesa

U.S. District Judge

None have appeared.

.ase DesOcrition:

Court:

Adversary(s):

A4.Case Dese t :

Appearance relating to temporary restrainingorder, p::elimlnary injunction and seizureorder under the Lanham Act and granting ofdefault judgment.

Fedi5 s. Di Paola E ISo._l y1appe_ pan-kBoutimaue et. al


89 Civ. 0477

Miriam G. CedarbaumU.S. District Judge

1/23/89 and 2/17/89

Defendant appeared p2 se and then defaulted.

Lanhan Act claim which was settled duringtrial.

Fendi S.a.s. di Paol Fendi Sorelle vs.Burlinag Qn oat FactorY Warehouse Cor.. et


86 Civ. 0671 (LBS)

Leonard B. SandU.S. District Judge

- v 4-

Dat.a of !rial:

A5.C§atmeAR _i t Name:

gase Nage:

299

5MVE £axT.-S-

May IS and 19, 1987

Gtacy J. Haigney, Esq.Herbert S. Kasner, Esq.Attorneys for Burlington Coat FactoryWarehouse and Monroe G. MileteinBurlington Cost Factory Warehouse, Corp.263 West 38th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)221-0010

Dennis C. Kreiger, Esq.Cuddy & FedderAttorneys for Firestone Mills, Inc. and Leo

Freund90 Maples AvenueWhite Plains, New York 10601(914) 761-1300

Motion for summary judgment granted anddamages and attorneys fees referred tomagistrate. Judgment after hearing entered.(Decision on motion reported at 642 F. Supp.1143 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)).

Fendi S.a.s. di ol ed e$~ gCosmetic World. Ltd.. Loradan Im9xr_Line Prina Inc. a/k/a Li Garbo Shoes.pa~nl_ g _souli 1 k a _e sngou a/k/a NaaBenedel. Paolo Vincelli and Mario Vincelli.


85 Civ. 9566

Leonard B, SandU.S. District Judge

Joel J. TylerMagistrate, U.S. District Court

1/6/88

Stanley Yaker, Esq.Attorney for Paolo Vincelli andMario Vincelli114 East 32nd Street

S80: 300

UOATM Ms.MUATI OEST.-4

Suite 1104New York, New York 10016(212) 983-7241

No attorneys appeared for other defendantswho settled p I.

Represented Bulgari Corporation of America onits appeal of the District Court's Denial ofa Motion to Modify a Preliminary Injunction(I had extensive participation in thedrafting of appellant's brief and reply and Ipredominantly drafted all motion papers andargued below). The order below was affirmedon appeal.

Republic of the Phi ipJnes vs. New YQokLan!f_ _ (the "Philippines Case") and

Security Pacific Mortgage and Real_ stAService Inc. v. CanadianJLaaS o pany. et al,(the "Security Pacific Case").

United States Court of Appeals for the Secondcircuit.

90-7322 and 90-7398

Thomas J. MeskillLawrence W. PierceGeorge C. PrattU.S. Circuit Judges

June 15, 1990 (Argued by Roy L. Reardon, Esq.of Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett)

AG.

koal:

801

Q=MnIeI**

Court:

.9-29ouml:

United States District CourtSouthern L istrict of New York

The Philippines Case - 86 Civ. 2294The Security Pacific Case - 87 Civ. 3629

Pierre N. LevalU.S. District Judge

2/12/90

David A. BotwinikPavia & Harcourt600 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-3500

~rnMAm~

aft5M GM. 7UATE ET.-7

Roy L. Reardon, Esq. (455-2840)David E. Massengill, Esq. (455-3555)Simpson Thacher & Bartlett425 Lexington AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 455-2000

Jeffrey J. Greenbaum, Esq.James M. Hirschhorn, Esg.Sills, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin,Tischman, Epstein & GrossAttorneys for the Republic of thePhilippines

Legal CenterI Riverfront PlazaNewark, New Jersey 07102(201) 643-7000

Order to Show Cause for Approval of Subleaseby Bulgari Corporation of America.

C... et &l. (the "Philippines Case") andSec ty Pacific Hortctae eal EstateService Inc. v. Canadian Land CMvA, JBI-.(the "Security Pacific Case")

802

NMWE GW.-S-

ParticisatimsUpnAXInA Moto

A7.Qoo Description:

Jeffrey J. Greenbaum, Esq.James M. Hirschhorn, Esq.Sills, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin,Tischman, Epstein & GrossAttorneys for the Republic of the

PhilippinesLegal Center1 Riverfront PlazaNewark, New Jersey 07102(201) 643-7000

Michael Stanton, Esq.Weil, Gotshal & MangesAttorneys for Security Pacific767 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10153(212) 310-8000

Represented claimant Nidera Handelscompagnie,B.V. in a novel claim in NAEGA arbitrationwhich sought indemnification from a sellerfor the attorneys fees and costs expended indefending against an action ini London byNidera's buyer. A partial award was renderedin favor of Nidera.

li lri tifandelsompagnie. B.V. vs. Contingnt I

American Arbitration AssociationNew York County

13-161-1038086

Fred C. AshnerBunge Corporation11720 Borman DriveSt. Louis, Missouri 63146(314) 872-3030

Theo Joseph147-36 Charter RoadJamaica, New York 11435(718) 969-3721Henri C.A. Van StolkVan Stolk Company, Inc.

D41* ofALtuziMa:

AS.

C9t:

Cam

~Fnl:

MSATE WT.-

30 Bay Street, Room 600Staten Island, New York 10301(718) 448-8113

9/27/88 and 3/2/89 - More hearings were held,but dates have been difficult to locatebecause case spanned over three years.

Gerald P. Lepp, Esq.General CounselContinental Grain Company277 Park AvenueNew York, New York 10172(212) 207-5686

Represented claimant Alfred C. ToepherInternational, G.m.b.H. in arbitration and inopposing motion to stay arbitration. Motionwas denied and cross motion to compelarbitration granted. Case involved issue ofwhether an alter ego of an entity who signedan arbitration agreement could be compelledto arbitrate. The motion was argued by DavidA. Botwinik of my office, but I prepared themotion papers.

A Notice of Appeal of the Order of theDistrict Court and a Motion for Stay ofArbitration Pending Appeal was brought beforethe Second Circuit. I argued the motion tostay, which motion was denied and the appealdismissed at the conclusion of the argumenton the motion.

Arbitration resulted in award in favor ofclaimant against party who signed agreementand alter ego.

Miserocchi £ C.. .A. vs. Alfred C.ToeopferInternational. G.m.b.H.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second

Circuit

85 - 7734

J. Edward Lumbard

303

304

James L. OakesGeorge C. PrattU.S. Circuit Judges

htzm e: September 17, 1984

&ft ~ : Stephen P. SheehanWistow & Barylick56 Pine StreetProvidence, Rhode Island 02903(401)831-2700

cale Name: Miseroochi & . S.. ys. AlfI C.Toeferor -, .9 G.m. d

court: United States District CourtSouthern District of New York

~AE9..1o: 84 Civ. 6112 (KTD)

Kevin Thomas DuffyU.S. District Judge

Date . _iArgument : September 5, 1984(argued by David A. Botwinik of Pavia &Harcourt)

A£ ylogr: Stephen P. SheehanWinstow & Barylick56 Pine StreetProvidence, Rhode Island 02903(401) 831-2700

Came Dersjptio: Represented the State of New York in itsprosecution of the first child pornographycase in New York State after the U.S. SupremeCourt upheld the constitutionality of NewYork's laws. Defendants convicted aftertrial and sentenced, respectively to 3-1/2 to7 and 2 to 6 years.

Ths._Peoole of the State of New York vrLsCle ent2 D'Alessio and Scott Hyman.F TTIT I V Or , M

7"

305

Inditmant No.:

nun E ST.-11-

Supreme Court of the State of New York,County of New York.

4581/82

Thomas B. OalliganActing Justice Supreme Court,

2/2/83 to 3/2/83

Ruogiate ggoUnuej:

Adyergarieu.

Al0.

Karen Greve MiltonGeneral CounselN.Y.S. Commission of Investigation270 Broadway26th FloorNew York, New York 10007(212) 577-0737

Steven Kimelman, P.C.Attorney for Scott Hyman110 East 59th Street, 33rd FloorNew York, New York 100022(212) 682-4200

James Bernard, Esq.Attorney for Clemente D'Alessio150 BroadwayNew York, New York 10038(212) 233-0260

Represented the State of New York, with co-counsel, in a consolidated trial of multiplemurders, attempted murders, burglaries,robberies and related crimes by the samedefendants. Defendant was convicted aftertrial and sentenced, consecutively, to 67-1/2years to life. I prepared and argued, beforeJustice Harold Rothwax, the applicability ofNew York State's consolidation criteria tocrimes of violence which-were spread over ayear's period of time and which had differentmodes of entry for each burglary.

The People of the State of ew York .Richard Maddicks.

lst Jud. Dist.

4

Ql

&o ,o ,IA-306

90OTAM~ .

SMTE 0GES1.12z

Supreme Court of the State of New York,County of New York.

886/82

James J. Leff

Justice, Supreme Court

Date@ Of Trial: Almost all of January 1983

L Cneo : Hugh H. Mo, Esq.Whitman & Ransom200 Park Avenue, 27th FloorNew York, New York 10166(212) 351-3448

a: Peter A. Furst, Esq.2136 Funston PlaceOakland, California 94602(415) 531-3904

7 ~ 7 . 7 7 7 7-- 77~

307

*am sowV. 1 , We

Partner's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions. Etc.&*I 6o spusse WWWkOees

rw0mw ur no o P 1990

bmeA- tfs ............................0I.

OWN 64 (1) kb~ve'4 ff kiwk s on1 or"s 4. tvegh E(bA......bde~st M~ qme mde on1, eIs 10e a b............

135 WI90 O e wK w ....................... . ..

64~~~~ .a-s'w .......

gooowSi "I.1 e $ill %I~, 0" 01 v.4h04 m .oe 51,166p 464 ... . ..

0U* 96164t** 6lol4W6t &VO 51661100d l mW5V 6.

"d "Mma "Oves (Rime wa ewlo i................ . ..

Crf (*vw ftml rasd~ sson G06 I"610 Dmil 13)mfa16 lo Maw41.66 to& Aw 0061...................

*0 .464 v.1*16 14 CoIw min4 ocovie ...............00 cw em (See kwvcfm .. .. ..............

5#J4dje K-1 (Sism OVA.6100I

Iasi

Hell I

P4.WA .'. edW .0111 41 on F 2 e wewvi '614rwm. a id SF 6*diW

SONIA SOT2(AYOR PAVIA & HIARCOURT

51 TvIRD ST 600 MADXSOK AVENEW YORK, NY NEW YORK, MYT 10022

A 641 0~w ew a~1 ... MYe4 D3 NO F MSCrasr .4w Pavmwfp 44 PH.u-YL2

* parm Gub4u~.4~m (I) Tex 0w ,glnse. qtvw 1, 0

~uew e momm. -m -* ...... 1q 4 r* W - kem w- *a t i ft p&-30 - .......... N0 . Yes 13No

Cow~.1wb~W ............... iiffDJ ----- Ii iw 0 (Sc Ne- Pet M ,O w w'.*)

* bt*pewI dsfwesiema 0 heoilp~w?- 06 tpvvpo o o*a-A~

*,1 ~ PAW" 00 l P-9011101N .e Ye == PWsee.smh o"I*; " 4WOW-$*

. ............ --- -%as ev I seek 6"c~) ....................... 01

IS a9- 2.52M 4224

lNo w4 can) from ogw few1 AA ..............

4 PW04 kI 01001)a two . ............................ 4 , 0 d .pn .a

b 0 ........................... . b 406 90L ..Pa neIS

6- d e NoMW--"wo"(m .... I......... ... 4d ch0 1" 18 Otl D a or 0 we So T1 bblim ~p (lft) .................. 40 4hD -5M w o mc Mr ()

I a4w poltiai.0 (ON) .................... o

rsiGww4e. porfwiU to P ~WI ................... ) 4 , 9

* N ais n "lo) Wids IkiMi is~1 (011w A ,fl is cam" or VWV961... 31

I 04hW Idw. (lo- ) ar1611eh ~ ~ l ) 70d" .______ ... s............, I. 7~

I OW 0 Cvuwe'. W . .................. .. 205 SCA A. 9% 14 of 1De4A- I sofeedon17 icSOWK ...... SEE. STAiDCET.4 A __ 446 Flei)

54. 5, i s coox taid too pofloft k161 *M ............. 0it_ 00W 04drtllac,h61~ SEE. STAiEXN a ii '0 52'

308

Vva %iC mw"bw ....... I.......... se a-,SIWMI weiiww~c

ils A=O~ aw"Ow Of r P"" wA I

~14 Avtm tdrg4f of baw persvds pfope1

Yes 0 CW b 4YaW " Im "auly pftoad In w-Ae arme st..... sit kpedwe K-i pT~wm sCm)

b .' f w. anomw ID wi atsc"OOe oww...I O To va cusim eILl sow rownde r* .....................

Drmdgn V" usgceo ; it C.,** srw

*u TW Woo Owns Cde ON)- No 0 PoW 13 Accue..... 170 Itomwwwl PumRano R i -ib evalabeW c . ............ * ..... 17 inis ranE

.. .. .we .......... I ~ ............ ___ See Formw mi 1Ltus.4

Ila T" wapewt. lo ~~c a social 55(a) vi.Cdn away ap* .... I"a______ _____6 TV" 0 **awa P

------------------ - -%Ws fcPA$@ O D-tfrtO"M owg CrOfs

a Cratw bc 42a w pw oow ......... ................. leE

Recap- m Dmew or Prop"i (S"e)

Pp"-w~ I rnCciw prowlyof MA wt,*VwPpw to~

0 Clam ofr ow b~a ........ Fr, m M

* CM 4 ewa rw o

21Suppbaef'W Ilomuom rsqcred 10 t* !0yOvld Np raly to each p~u(saci nCWo ~~llIwe e mp w is ewreC.)

W

"sun

___PATR 10

VAM1~zR 10

IATDKM 4 - MM~ 1063, 6amoVzz 3t-3PAVZA & ZRA00oaa

23360403

SONIA 80T~myOK092-44-0429

Iii? 3 - SECTION 179 zxPJsV IZEWCTXON

OPTIC? zQU?? 446

TOTAL 446

LIE! 11 - OTMM? DZWCTIroxs

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS t

TOTAL 52

809

'Pan zo

310

[7&___ FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORT I se" *5 ~~..5.0 I41-113)

1. 151a40 sopatia 110st a,. fires. .1461. wrtwal 3. court or crg.4IuAUS J. "to ofAsec

So"SooayrU.S. District Court fOr tbe-'-- 2, 199

4. n111 (Aticle] s:] ados la61.ata active cc I. As vyps (hel febcpprovizlaA tynme) 0.lpslazieldgustosu 14.4115.5 1"6245 Dmiastea

d~a ~1211341 __ Sina - Via December 2, 2991

7. Cbsba se 091108 seeemPavia & Darcoirt6W0 Madison AvenneN"e York, N.Y. 10022

IUORTANT NOMR Mh uou .baimpalvf ghw Jbm nwin be f.Oowwi Con$,te &B paste-~dd On NONE box he eeb ecika wberv you bees Do repcnab hitorswelom Sipw an kau Pass

1. POSMONS. (aRportinj ftndMuaiG onfts pp.7-8 of InlZiCona.)

Li ONE (Be repesta Possumsn)

Member, board of Directors New York CieCnaie i an.'. s-

Member. &oard of OileSft2jL __s xUr~ s~ t-- -

11. AGREEMENTS. (Reporting lud~dual onlyw p. 9-9 of 1wiMW~y d1 plaes moo ATTAC5(DI? A)

[jjNOINE I5 w~~alraa~sntal

AS a partner in Pavia & Barcourt, I have a 1.50 of 1060 internet in the firm which interest

the percentage Interest in the firm of deceased and retired partners. This redistribution

-- _r 4D.taakand Its ...1LLj1*... iaeati2oSdf a RIne' flL..i!LteFrt in general117

negotiated at the time of a resignation but the partnership hss two years to pay the interest

iAXu2wSngs. hDAVO advisedi =a that- tev Attemt to liquidate my interest pri-orto -x-

iir."bFVfU1 W ifA51f. (Reportnin dtMual and spouse; see pp. 9-12 of insruciions.)

26Mh SOURCE &MD T3PE 9 SI

(Hoork l only) (yowl, nOI spouse'$)

Ejj ON l svometaes-stss ibease)

I Pavia a flarceurt loome 1990 $151,761. (gross)

In 1991 to dte, I have received distributions from my $_______

firm In the amount of $133,544 (gross), but until

_____ gheda1.L.L-1

. - arS 106% Is azenerad for y tax filing n$_______

April. 1992. 1 will not know my exact gross Income basedOnPm ft-%jP5.1 S eA ms ...lt ______

etc._______________________________ _________

,ltate of new York Mortgage Agency 300.I~ee y~n14('Is. ljenela ulane 14ard$ 1.000.

trasyent of $100 per dies for service on Boards of Directors.

311

nNaNCAL DSCLOSURE RMPRT (cmeid)

I Foals ffotxwayorzJ

".REIMBURSEMENTS and GIFTS - tranporttion, lodging, food, entertainment

ft] OwN Wd= - N==st55= 0

T-

V. OTHER GIFTS.jmIadnsssolepw .ssjpdbetsi (ua ad ;rC 5

[]NONX (" "a xWISIm Ott")

V1. UABiLIES. (Induda & £of Vsoun od dependcal cdreu. Indicte wl~am app4icbme jieom MePMOasbWivida1a4 ='bwwO)(C)' fOw Ui~Wy of a depad.Jf

[j-jj NONE (No zagwtha~ lIJmuUASI

Iu "&aber ot pavia a Elarcourt, I am contingently liable for the debts and obligation*Y-diefirm Incurred during my partnership. lbs firm, boweeor, has paid Its debts in

~-!K!UF~dno cpzm ~~~ ~aoual-W~ az a -smaD

qa s au IFl6555 tls 3 mm UO~ $,a 5 & a 50,0" tso ~ * a ,ei I

312

FVNACLAL DISCLOSURE REPORT (wstd) I ci sotaeyo ismbr 2. 1991

V11. INVETMENTS and TRUSTS - Income, value, tranactons. awn14s4 towo

FIT MlTIiT- oo~xsac

Citibank. M NY., N.Y IF AU I . -L.2 ... - -

Loa Loan /AzeoI -

part*- jla r -

WeIII

I- -p --rcgr an - t~ A- Am- L

Sstoc. 6donot managea&d not he 0 store paver ur ay ofbo

rmttothose ccol=Mts N 1-2, 1 5 1990 io at. bea reo for

Aev 0 - f 0406 7l -- -*ee - . .feC - .e tr- ot - -.

Ilatil the close of tbe ca en year an a K-i is prop ed 'or my firw

13-IWit bu M MA a..7 TUTIC r- ITF onY3 fTK M1-31' - ____-

interest In my firm, 1.5% of 1 1. do ot con :rol or i za the : irs riiie eeee *minr ico a ~o T *a a -El- wma ~i icl-ed.

l#MastM1n1r-n A 9aa t t

21Imt 1S -251 o$N Ialu430

I o 930661t l

1900M

Si- - - - -

0 ZsOs~sCo~s &-1000 la fl.1.00 to .3.00 0.2,1 1 500 .4.010*40.0

~~~~~~~~~~~ Rau~O0 0 1

OO 09J

S sa~I 0.0

t. cai ) -et ess pQh Nm ml

318

PINaN AL DLBOCU URE REPORT (onait otldyn

Vil. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION or EXPLANATIONS. o(lass Pan af t at.)

D. CERTIFICATION.

In compiance with the provislm of 28 U SC 1455 and of A&1isy Opinion No. 57 of the Mvbo Comittee onJudicial Activies, and to the best of my knowldge at the time afta reasonable inquiry, I did not perform any adjudicatoryfunclon In ay litiption dnrlng the period ered by ths report in which I, my spouse, or my minor or dependent chidrehad a Etadal iatertst, a de&,d In Canon 3C(3)(c) En the outcome of such Utipto.

I cerdly that D Information glvtn above (ldtsdltg Iomato n pmtanlg to my spouse and minor or dependent chM renV any) i accaste, ure, and wnplcte to the best of my knonledge and betie and that any inlormstion not reported waswithheld became It me applicable statutory p Jonrs permitted non-disour.

I ttber c rtli that earned Wme from outside emploment and honoraris and the acoeptance of gli which have benreported are Is Wompan e with the provisions of S US "'.A app. 7, # .01 eL seq. 5 U.S.C 1 7353 and Judial Conerence

NOM ANY NDIVIDUAL WHO 7J(dWINOLY AND WI.FULLY FASIEFIES OR FAILS TO FU.E THIS REPORTMAY BE SUBECI TO C3VL AND CRMINAL SANCTIONS (5 US.C.A. APP. 6, # 104, AND 18 U.S.C. 1 1001.)

PILING WYMFUCHIONS.

A-ia 0pod mgla st 3 adhiA o~~w o: udidial Ethlcs CbmmlomreAdministrate OM of tLe

Unitd Sttes Cout

Wah^eD C4

UW

314

SoI s Sotosyor - Doebe"r2,

TUCR4IT A

Member, board of Directors

Ome of three Trustees for

Co of three Trustees for

one of three Trustees for

One of three Trustees for




Puerto Rican Legal Defense and zducationlun4

OrtIs 1989 Pamily Trust

Candido Ortis Trust for the benefit ofAzanda Kati Valdes

Cavdido Ortis Trust for the benefit ofChevy Lopes

CendIdo Ortis Traust for the benefit ofChristina Citron

Candid* Ortiz Trust for the benefit ofDavid Thomqson

Candido Ortis Trust for the benefit ofChristopher Thompson

Candido Ortis Trust for the benefit ofChristopher Valdes

I have no beneficial interest in the trusts.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT

HET WORT14

ftovw 0 copee pCanant rinancil "Ie wonh atinan wtc Iteimhe In detail all aiuts fwectviag bankmCCUWiS, Mel estt. *GCUkftas. PUISt b-vSlImfi. and other financial tsoldings) all liabilities (iftwingdebtgwiolpes kens and other financial obligations) of your~fl. Mir spomse and ~~e klunedts ellb MM oyourwabl

ASIFT LIADILMflEN0h s han and in hooist" payable Is 11n%-OSWldUs. ar~b *sgAjg..j tHotu payable I bernb-a-sewed

aesmNJ- 0 hoe Paow to mbtkmeIMad Sonomae-ON echift'e Nwe payable to guessUIMWt 0000mos-me44 sow"~d o AMWun ard WAS duesmnuff o aam mWabmN 0 1uI.d bigame ia

PA too uLaww a" MA is uipah 5308 too*A bWeabus Oeow poll~ Us!eut* 40S&M~ae Payab4e-edd 82,500 (6

AiLMN aV4 atSW peIS4hia PRWtY 45,000 _4 Ohr11-16l

* ;-Pav a~ 1arcourt -al -bod - y am038. 831

"Mar" 1-77 11Tws - Tt's! ot nd "1 37 616. (

CV~NftWT UASIL!T1 None MOMj WENA iivhaft w

AS esd*ec. wmer 4w gusueralan b" hwi esswmaSaaia"MPPOW'*A far Poesw 1010011 TeaOW SPWW de

Are NJt 4asM Plefaw Q (S~Wa*towa

Art you defeedaig in a"p af wmeet seal

Have you aw Wabs Jwxb~a~E -oj shares

- - - I -~

For not~es (1) thru (9) wee attached Schedule A.

60-251 0 - 93 - 11

816"

Af~ 'J

316

2. A Citibank N.A. joint checking and saviiigs account.

2. This represents an interest free loan I made onAugust 23, 1991 to Cobble Hill Laundry Dry CleaningPlant, Ltd., a company owned by a friend. The moneyis being paid to no over a three year period.

3. 1 own the cooperative shares for my residence, 513rd Street, Apt. IL, Brooklyn, New York 11231, whichI have valued at my purchase price.

4. I own a 1984 Honda Civic and the remainder of thisevaluation includes furnishing, clothing, jewelry,etc., at cost.

5. Citibank Visa and Barrie Pace Ltd. credit card debt.

6. This is a mortgage at Apple Bank for Savings for mypersonal residence. The shares for my cooperativeapartment are pledged to the Bank for that mortgage.

7. I have and pay a lease for my mother's Honda Civicwith GE Capital Auto Lease, Inc. at the rate of$219.69 per month. The lease terminates in June1992.

8. As a member of Pavia & Harcourt, I am contingentlyliable for the debts and obligations incurred by thefirm prior to my withdrawal as a partner. The firmhas paid its debts in the ordinary course ofbusiness. There is no reason to believe it wouldnot do so upon my withdrawal as a partner. No claimagainst me individually has ever been made and noneis anticipated.

9. My firm has been sued by former clients since I havebeen a partner but not for any matter in which Tparticipated. The firm has insurance which itbelieves is adequate to cover any potentialliability.

ImNAT SnAT.-t- - SCOTUSblog

Documents

Transcript of ImNAT SnAT.-t- - SCOTUSblog