IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

44
IMM ( Integrated Modifica0on Methodology) Sustainable Urban Design and Transforma0on. A case study. M. Tadi S.Vahabzadeh [email protected] [email protected] Milan, 22 nd October 2012.

description

Sustainable  Urban Design and Transformation. A case study.

Transcript of IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Page 1: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

IMM  (  Integrated  Modifica0on  Methodology)    Sustainable  Urban  Design  and  Transforma0on.  A  case  study.    M.  Tadi    S.Vahabzadeh  [email protected]  [email protected]  

   Milan,  22nd  October  2012.      

Page 2: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  
Page 3: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  
Page 4: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Integrated Sustainable Urban Design: Neighborhood design proceeded by sustainable urban morphology emergence. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, UK 2012. Vol 155: p. 12. Urban Morphological Transformation Via Urban Constituent Optimization: A Sustainable Neighborhood Design Based On Integrative Modification Methodology. In: GBOD 2012. vol. In press. Shenyang, China; 2012: 10 Sustainable urban morphology emergence via Complex Adaptive System analysis. Procedia Engineering 2011, 21:89-97. A Sustainable Urban morphology for a greener City: Strategy Applied for a Sustainable-oriented Urban Design Design Principle and Practice USA 2012, In press:10. Sustainable Urban morphology for a greener city: an integreated approach for thr energy-efficiency of neighborhoods. In: GreenAge Symposim: 2012 2012; Mimar Sinan Fine Art University, Istanbul, Turkey; 2012: 12.

Page 5: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

INTRODUCTION  NEIGHBOURHOOD    LOCAL  PROPOSAL  CONCLUSION    

Page 6: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Crèdits

Page 7: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

The  Masterplan  from  Manuel  Gausa  

   

EXAMPLE    P        EIXAMPLE      

RO OR

Page 8: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

DEFINING  THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE  -­‐  CONNECTIVITY        

LEGEND                        case  studies                        voids  recovered                      voids  being  recovered                        

Page 9: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

LEGEND                        case  studies                        voids  recovered                      voids  being  recovered                        9  block  leaves                                150m  radius                          

DEFINING  THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE    -­‐  DIVERSITY        

LEGEND                        case  studies                        voids  recovered                      voids  being  recovered    

                       

Page 10: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Energy  consumed  per  person/year  :  10.52  mwh  

Energy  consumed  per  person/year  (only  residen<al)  :  2.96  mwh  

Electrical   energy   consumed  p e r   p e r s o n / y e a r  (residen<al)  :  1.43  mwh  

0  

2000  

4000  

6000  

8000  Electrical  energy  consumed  

Residen8al  energy  consumed  

Total  energy  consumed  

640p  /block  

17058569    Mwh   2807514  Mwh   5615  Mwh  

Energy  consump<on  of  Barcelona  

Page 11: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Actual  Energy  Situa0on                                                              Total  Energy  ConsumpNon/  Inhabitant               10.52  MWh/Inhab/Y  Total  Energy  ConsumpNon/  Inhabitant(ResidenNal  Sector)       2.96  MWh/Inhab/Y  Electricity  ConsumpNon  /Inhab(ResidenNal  Sector)           1.43  MWh/Inhab/Y  Total  Energy  ConsumpNon/  Inhab(TransportaNon  Sector)       2.54  MWh/Inhab/Y  Number  of  people  in  41  Blocks               26240  Persons      

Calcula0on  at  Intermediate  level                                                              Total  Energy  consumpNon(41  Blocks)               276.0448  GWh/Y      Total  Energy  consumpNon  only  in  ResidenNal  Sector(41  Blocks)   77.6704  GWh/Y      Electricity  ConsumpNon  only  in  ResidenNal  Sector  (41  Blocks)       37.5232  GWh/Y      Total  Energy  ConsumpNon  only  in  TransportaNon  Sector(41  Blocks)   66.6496  GWh/Y      

0  50  

100  150  200  250  300  

CalculaNon  at  intermediate  level(GWh/Y)  

Total  Energy  ConsumpNon  

Energy  Consumed  in  ResidenNal  Sector  

PERFORMANCE  -­‐  ACTUAL  ENERGY  CONSUMPTION  

   

Page 12: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

INTRODUCTION  THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE    LOCAL  PROPOSAL  CONCLUSION    

Page 13: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE    -­‐  connecNng  the  voids  

 

LEGEND                        case  studies                        voids  recovered                        

Page 14: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE    -­‐  connecNng  the  voids  COURTYARD  PROPOSAL  

                                           exisNng  void/street  connecNons                      proposed  void/street  connecNons                        removed  void/street  connecNons  

LEGEND                                        

Page 15: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE    -­‐  connecNng  the  voids  COURTYARD  PROPOSAL  

Page 16: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

THE  INTERMEDIATE  SCALE    -­‐  Before  and  A_er  modificaNons:  intermediate  scale  intervenNon  by  modificaNon  and  integraNon  of  different  layers  

Page 17: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

STAGES    -­‐  PROPOSED  STREET  NETWORK  –  REDUCTION  OF  CO2  TRANSPORTATION      

 

1)  2.5%   2)  6.7%   3)  9.5%  

LEGEND                      voids  recovered                      green  side  walks                      pedestrian  walk                      green  nodes                        

Description 1st  stage 2nd  stage 3rd  stageNumbers  of  removing  cars 120 324 456Energy  saving  [GW-­‐h/year] 1.3 3.6 5.1Energy  saving  [%] 2.1 5.7 8.1CO2  Reduction  [%] 2.5 6.7 9.5Trees  in  each  street 2 5 10CO2  absoption  [Kg/Y] 1900 4750 9500

CO2  Reduction  [%] 0.35 0.8 1.7

Page 18: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

INTRODUCTION  NEIGHBOURHOOD    LOCAL  PROPOSAL    CONCLUSION        

Page 19: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

19  /88  

PRODUCTION  CONSERVATION  

SHARING  COMFORT  

PV  ON  FACADE  

Hourly  solar  exposure  /  25  may    /  facade  SE   Incident  solar  radiaNon  /  avg  day  /  facade  SE  

Shades  and  solar  path  /  25  may    /  9  blocks  

Page 20: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

20  /88  

PRODUCTION  CONSERVATION  

SHARING  COMFORT  

PV  ON  FACADE  AVERAGE  DAILY  SOLAR  EXPOSURE

             AVAIL.      AVG        INCIDENT          TRANSMITTED  MONTH      Wh/m2  SHADE  Wh/m2  Wh/m2 Light-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐Jan       1797 100% 335 166 0Feb       2810 94% 463 229 0,06Mar       4052 80% 602 298 0,2Apr       5410 77% 914 452 0,23May       6676 68% 1188 588 0,32Jun       7533 67% 1275 631 0,33Jul       6746 67% 1328 657 0,35Aug       6289 65% 999 494 0,22Sep       5228 78% 847 419 0,22Oct       3241 85% 615 304 0,15Nov       2050 93% 367 182 0,07Dec       1326 100% 312 155 0

Page 21: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

21  /88  

PRODUCTION  CONSERVATION  

SHARING  COMFORT  

COOLING  A  100,000  BTUair  condiNoner  with  a  high  seasonal  energy  efficiency  raNo  (SEER)  of  14  requires  around  7  kW  of  electric  power  for  full  cooling  output  on  a  hot  day.  This  would  require  over  a  7  kW  solar  photovoltaic  electricity  generaNon  system.  

A

B

A

B

325  s.m.  verNcal  panels:  150,15  avg  daily  kWh  producNon  

7  kWh  has  generated  by  13  .m.  inclinated  panels  in  the  roof  

Page 22: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

22  /88  

PRODUCTION  CONSERVATION  

 SHARING  COMFORT  

WIND  

Facade  Length  (m)   61  Swept  Area  of  a  Turbine  (m)   1  Space  Between  Turbines  (m)   2.5  

Space  Needed  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  Facade  (m)   5.5  Number  of  Wind  Turbines   15  

Wind  Speed   24km/h   6,67m/s  

Wind  Calcula0ons  (kWh)  Facade  

South   North  SE   SW   NE   NW  

266.4   266.4   360   360  532.8   720  

Yearly  total  (kWh)   1252.8  

Page 23: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

23  /88  

PRODUCTION  CONSERVATION  

SHARING  COMFORT  

WATER  RECYCLING  

NOT  POSSIBLE  TO  EXCAVATE  

POSSIBLE  TO  EXCAVATE  

A   B  

A  

B  

Page 24: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

24  /88  

PRODUCTION  CONSERVATION  

SHARING  COMFORT  

CAR  /  BIKE  SHARING  

Car  Sharing  CiNes   Start   Cars   Users   Parkings   PopulaNon  

Milano   2001   96   3.125   56   1.317.882

Roma   2005   107   1.945   61   2.754.440  

Torino   2002   118   2.500   85   910.188  

Venezia   2002   47   3.300   11   270.660  

TOTAL       368   10.870   213   5.253.170  

Users/Cars   Cars/Parkings  29,53804348   1,727699531  

Users   Cars   Parkings  

1320   44,68   25,86  

45   22  

Blocks   People/Block   PopulaNon  

44   600   26400  

Bike  Sharing  CiNes   Start   Bikes   StaNons   PopulaNon  

Milano   2008   5000   200   1.317.882  

Paris   2007   20600   1450   2.193.031  

Barcelona   2007   6000   400   1.621.537  

TOTAL       31600   2050   5.132.450  

People/Bikes   Bikes/StaNons  

162,41930   15  

PopulaNon   Bikes   StaNons  

26400   162,54   10,54  

200   22  

Page 25: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

BLOCK  INTERIOR  CASE  STUDIES  

Paula  Montal  Gardens  

M.  MaNlde  Almendros  Gardens  

Cesar  MarNnell  Gardens  

Mercè  Vilaret  Gardens  

Page 26: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

CASE  STUDY  1  –  Jardins  de  MaNlde  Almendros    

Page 27: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Popula0on  City   Eixample   9  Blocks  

1,621,537   266,874   4,619  

Energy  demand  (MWh/p/year)  

City   Eixample   Residen8al  

10.52   10.52   2.968  

No.  Block   415   1  

No.  Inhabitant   266,874   640  

Energy  consump<on  

792,082   1899.6  

Roof  area(sqm)   11,000  m2  

Solar  collector   3,300  Mwh  

Facade  area(sqm)   1,108  m2  

Solar  collector   222  Mwh  

0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

exisNng  suggested  

energy  consump8on  

exisNng  

suggested  

 1900    -­‐  1233  MWh  

 

Energy  gain  per  year  :    

CASE  STUDY  1  –  Jardins  de  MaNlde  Almendros    

Page 28: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

CASE  STUDY  2  –  Jardins  de  PAULA  MONTAL  

Page 29: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

1  building  :  100.000  BTU  cooling  air  condiNoner  

Consumed  :  7kW  electric  power  

Required  :  10  kW  solar  PV  electric  generated  

Equal  :  25  m2  inclinated  panel  on  each  roof  

Total  :  1000  m2  PV  panel  (10%  roof  covering)  

SOLA

R  PA

NEL  

CASE  STUDY  2  –  Jardins  de  PAULA  MONTAL  

Page 30: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

 Energy  saving  :  40  *  14  *  365  =  

~  205  MWh  24%  electrical  energy  

saving!  

Offer  :  20%  roof  covering  SO

LAR  PA

NEL  

CASE  STUDY  2  –  Jardins  de  PAULA  MONTAL  

Page 31: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Personal  consump0on:  

50  L/day  

10%  of  roof  area  

CorrecNon  factor  70%  

~  360  MWh/year  40%  electrical  energy  saving!  

Capacity(per  year)   514.8 KWh/m2

Area(    %  of  roof  area)   1000 m2

Tot  Electricity  generated/year   514800 KWh

Correc8on  factor:  70%   360360 KWh/y

SOLA

R  CO

LLECTO

R  CASE  STUDY  2  –  Jardins  de  PAULA  MONTAL  

Page 32: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

CASE  STUDY  3  –  Jardins  de  CÉSAR  MARTINELL  

Page 33: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

PV  Cell  Calcula0on  for  roof  

Capacity   0.5   KWh/m2  

Area   4912   m2  

Total  Electricity  generated/  day   2456   KWh  

Electricity  generated/  year   884160   KWh/y  

Correc<on  factor(Maintenance)   618912   KWh/y  0  

500000  

1000000  

1500000  

2000000  

Energy  Consumed  in  Building  

Electricity  Consumed  In  building  

Electricity  generated  by  PV  Cells  on  Roof  

PV  Leaves  on  Southern  Façade  Considera<on  opera<on  <me  (13  hours)  

Leaf  Size   0.051562   m2  

Electricity  generated  by  1  leaf  4   W  

Total  area  of  façade   1410   m2  

Number  of  Leaves   27345.7  Total  Electricty  generated  due  

to  leaves  per  day   1422.0   KWh  

Total  Electricty  generated  due  to  leaves  per  year   511911.9   KWh  

Total  per  year  (70%  correc<on  factor)   358338.31   KWh  

0  

500000  

1000000  

1500000  

2000000  

Total  energy  Consumed  in  Building  

Total  Electricity  Consumed  in  Building  

Electricty  produced  by  PV  Leaves  

Energy  Efficiency  :  32.67%    

Electrical  Efficiency:    67.63%  

Energy  Efficiency  :  18.91%    

Electrical  Efficiency:    39.15%  

CASE  STUDY  3  –  Jardins  de  CÉSAR  MARTINELL  

Page 34: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Energy  Generated  By  Solar  Collector  

Capacity    per  day   0.5   KWh/m2  

Capacity    per  year   514.8   KWh/m2  

Area(20%  of  half  roof)  982.4   m2  

Electricity  generated/  year   505739.52   KWh/y  

Correc<on  factor(Maintenance)   354017.664   KWh/y   0  

500000  

1000000  

1500000  

2000000  Energy  Consumed  By  Residents  

Electricity  Consumed  by  Residents  

Energy  produced  by  solar  Collectors  

Energy  Efficiency  :  18.69%    

Electrical  Efficiency:    38.68%  

0  

500000  

1000000  

1500000  

2000000  

Total  Energy  consumed  by  Residents  

Energy  produced  

Total  energy  gain  per  year  :  1331  Mwh  !!!  

Total  Energy  

effeciency    

70.27%  

CASE  STUDY  3  –  Jardins  de  CÉSAR  MARTINELL  

Page 35: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

•     Parks  solar  lights                                                                                  Park  Solar  Trees                                                                Electric  Bicycle                                                                                                                              

 

Rain  Water  Collector  

 

Total  rainwater  amount:  ~  95  m3    

Peak  season  collecNon:  ~  50  m3    

Gardening  purpose  

CASE  STUDY  3  –  Jardins  de  CÉSAR  MARTINELL  

Page 36: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

CASE  STUDY  4  –  Jardins  de  Mercè  Vilaret  

Page 37: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Popula0on  City   Eixample   9  Blocks  

1,621,537   266,874   4,619  

Energy  demand  (MWh/p/year)  

City   Eixample   Residen8al  

10.52   10.52   2.968  

No.  Block   415   1  

No.  Inhabitant   266,874   640  

Energy  consumpNon  

792,082   1899.6  

Roof  area(sqm)   11,100  m2  

Solar  collector   3,330    Mwh  

Facade  area(sqm)   1,150  m2  

Solar  collector   230  Mwh  

 1894  -­‐  1325  MWh  

 

Energy  gain  per  year  :    

0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

exisNng  suggested  

energy  consump8on  

exisNng  

suggested  

CASE  STUDY  4  –  Jardins  de  Mercè  Vilaret  

Page 38: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

INTRODUCTION  NEIGHBOURHOOD    LOCAL  PROPOSAL  CONCLUSION  

Page 39: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Energy  Calculation  for  Buildings  at  Global  &  Intermediate  level

Total  Energy  Consumption/  person/  Y(Residential  Sector) 2.96 MWh/p/y

Total  Energy  Consumption/  person/  Y(Transporatation  Sector) 2.54 MWh/p/y

Total  Energy  Consumption/  person/  Y(Residential+Transporatation  Sector) 5.5 MWh/p/yNumber  of  Blocks  in  Eixample=   500 numbersNumber  of  blocks  at  Intermediate  level 41 numbers

Total  energy  Consumed  by  Inhabitants  in  1  Block 1.89 GWh/YTotal  energy  Consumed  by  Inhabitants  in  41  blocks(Intermediate  level) 77.67 GWh/YTotal  energy  Consumed  by  Inhabitants  in  500  blocks(Global,  Eixample  level) 947.2 GWh/Y

1.23 GWh/Y 0.57 GWh/Y Total  Energy  Produced= 1.33 GWh/Y Total  Energy  Produced= 1.32 GWh/Y

Efficiency= 65.0 % Efficiency= 29.8 % 70.3 % 69.7 %

04  Jardin  Mercè  Vilaret  

Efficiency=

01  Jardin  de  Maria  Matilda  Almendros

Efficiency=

02  Jardin  de  Paula  Montal 03  Jardin  de  Cesar  Martinell

Total  Energy  Produced=

Total  Energy  Produced=

Summary of 4 projects

Page 40: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Report  of  the  evalua0on  of  the  global  group  over  the  design  and  proposals  of  the  teams:  

Shadow  analysis:  1-­‐  Figure  1  showing  all  possible  sun  posiNon  in  the  sky.    Sun  is  in  a  really  low  alNtude.  2-­‐  shadow  line  inside  the  courtyard  shows  that  The  sun  is  entering  the  yard  even  when  it  is  really  in  low  alNtude.  3-­‐   Any   kind   of   solar   radiaNon   usage,   like   solar   leaves   is   therefore   possible   inside   the  courtyard.  

 

Figure 2. shows more specifically the division of solar energy production. 4 different case studies were analyzed.

Figure  3.  shows  the  comparison  between  the  actual  consumpNon  of  energy  of  a  block  and  the  amount  of  energy  which  is  being  produced  by  renewable  sources  of  energy.  

Figure 1

Page 41: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

4.36 GWh/Y77.67 GWh/Y5.61 %

Effect  of  4  blocks  at  Intermediate  level

Total  energy  Consumed  in  41  blocksEnergy  Produced  by  4  designed  Blocks

Efficiency

Energy Comparison between Actual and Proposed system for building sector

Energy Comparison between Actual and Proposed

system for Transportation sector

4.45 GWh/Y49.26 GWh/Y53.71 GWh/Y69.14 %

With  maximum  efficient  system

37+4  Blocks  with  Jardin  de  Cesar  Martinell  Model  at  Intermediate  levelEnergy  Produced  by  4  designed  BlocksEnergy  produced  by  37  blocks  Total  Energy  ProducedEfficiency

4.45 GWh/Y20.91 GWh/Y25.35 GWh/Y32.64 %Efficiency

With  minimum  efficient  system

37+4  Blocks  with  Jardin  de  Paula  Montal  Model  at  Intermediate  level

Energy  Produced  by  4  designed  BlocksEnergy  produced  by  37  blocks  Total  Energy  Produced

Page 42: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

Total Energy Comparison for building and transportation sectors at intermediate level

Total Energy Comparison between three proposed systems.

With  minimum  efficiency  of  transportation  and  building  energy  system

5.75 GWh/Y

144.32 GWh/Y

3.98 %

Total  Energy  produced  =  

Total  Energy  Consumed

Efficiency

Energy  saving  with  4  Blocks  +  1st  stage  Transportation  System  

Energy  saving  with  jardin  de  Cesar  model+  3rd  stage  Transportation  SystemWith  maximum  efficiency  of  transportation  and  building  energy  system

58.81 GWh/Y

144.32 GWh/Y

40.75 %

Total  Energy  produced  =  Total  Energy  ConsumedEfficiency

5.75 GWh/Y

144.32 GWh/Y

3.98 %Efficiency

Total  Energy  produced  =  

Total  Energy  Consumed

58.81 GWh/Y

144.32 GWh/Y

40.75 %

Total  Energy  produced  =  Total  Energy  ConsumedEfficiency

Energy  saving  with  jardin  de  Paula  Montal  model+  2nd  stage  Transportation  SystemWith  intermediate  efficiency  of  transportation  and  building  energy  system

28.95 GWh/Y

144.32 GWh/Y

20.06 %

Total  Energy  ConsumedEfficiency

Total  Energy  produced  =  

Energy  saving  with  jardin  de  Paula  Montal  model+  2nd  stage  Transportation  SystemWith  intermediate  efficiency  of  transportation  and  building  energy  system

28.95 GWh/Y

144.32 GWh/Y

20.06 %

Total  Energy  ConsumedEfficiency

Total  Energy  produced  =  

Page 43: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  
Page 44: IMM ( Integrated Modification Methodology)  

THANK YOU!