(Im)balances in doctoral mobility

19
www.eurodoc.net Mobility patterns of doctoral researchers- Comparison between countries and disciplines At the Bologna Seminar From Imbalanced to Balanced Mobility in the EHEA – Current Challenges and Perspectives for the Future Snežana Krstić & Daniel Mietchen Berlin, March 28, 2011

description

A talk given at the workshop "From imbalanced to balanced Mobility in the EHEA – current Challenges and Perspectives for the Future", 28-29 March 2011, Berlin. See http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Bologna_workshop_2011_mobility_%28imbalances%29 for further information.

Transcript of (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

Page 1: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

www.eurodoc.net

Mobility patterns of doctoral researchers-Comparison between countries and disciplines

At the Bologna SeminarFrom Imbalanced to Balanced Mobility in the EHEA –

Current Challenges and Perspectives for the Future

Snežana Krstić & Daniel MietchenBerlin, March 28, 2011

Page 2: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

EURODOC in Europe

www.eurodoc.net

EUROPEAN COUNCIL OF DOCTORALCANDIDATES AND JUNIOR RESEARCHERS

• Voice of young researchers in Europe• Promotes young researchers• Contributes to EHEA and ERA policies

• Partner of EC, EUA, Euroscience, ESOF

Page 3: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Eurodoc on a Map

www.eurodoc.net

Page 4: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

EURODOC survey on doctoral candidates

www.eurodoc.net

• Purpose: o Exploring the real situation concerning current

conditions related to mobility, career development, assessment of doctoral programme and working conditions

o Supporting Eurodoc policy activities with empirical evidenceo Exploring the differences between countries, cultures and

models of doctoral education • About 100,000 respondents from over 30 countries• The first survey of doctoral researchers on this

scale – in cooperation with the International Centre for Higher Education Research at the University of Kassel. • Previous surveys are mainly country reports or focused only on

some topics• http://www.eurodoc.net/workgroups/surveys/

Page 5: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

The professional reasons for going abroad – Part 1

www.eurodoc.net

Preliminary results; official presentation at Eurodoc 2011

Page 6: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

The professional reasons for going abroad – Part 2

www.eurodoc.net

Page 7: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11www.eurodoc.net

Pursuing doctorate abroad

21.3% (22% female and 19.9% male)

Page 8: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

The most important sources of funding

www.eurodoc.net

Scholarships 63.3%Employment 46.1%Personal savings 21.4%

Page 9: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

The most important sources of funding

www.eurodoc.net

Page 10: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Personal reasons for mobility – Part 1

www.eurodoc.net

Better career prospects 79.7%Cooperation with prominent scientists 75.9%Better research facilities abroad 75.2%

Professional plans of family membersBetter social security

Page 11: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Personal reasons for mobility – Part 2

www.eurodoc.net

Page 12: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Personal reasons for mobility – Part 3

www.eurodoc.net

Page 13: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Other obstaclesrecognized by Eurodoc

www.eurodoc.net

Recruitment proceduresNot efficient and not transparent

The European Charter for Researchers andThe Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers (Charter & Code)

Low awareness on Charter & CodeLess then 9%

Page 14: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Intention to move or stay abroad (geographical distribution)

www.eurodoc.net

Yes 30.9%No 21.6%

Page 15: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Intention to move or stay abroad (disciplinary distribution)

www.eurodoc.net

Page 16: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Doctoral research at the intersectionOf EHEA and ERA

www.eurodoc.net

In the ERA and many member countries, there is a focus on sharpening the research profile of a region.

Research spending varies widely across reginos and countries.

This means that researchers in different disciplines will be differently attracted to a given region.

A certain level of imbalances is inevitable.

What level of balance should we strive for?

Page 17: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Mobility for mobility's sake?Some personal comments

www.eurodoc.net

Reconsider virtual (and blended) mobility.I could have given this talk remotelyOthers could have joined in remotely

Some programs count international experience in terms of (post-graduate) years abroad.

But much international experience can be gained at home while cooperating with others over the web or taking web-based international courses.

International experience does not guarantee a permanent position in public research.

Page 18: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

1/18/11

Conclusions

www.eurodoc.net

Geographical and disciplinary differences in mobility pattern exist

Unsuitable recruitment procedures are an obstacle to mobility and career prospects

Awareness on Charter & Code should be improved

Start thinking about virtual mobility

Page 19: (Im)balances in doctoral mobility

www.eurodoc.net

For more information, please, visit our webpage:

www.eurodoc.net

or contact us at:[email protected]

The presentation is based on the one for the 4th EUA-CDE workshop,

Budapest, Jan 2011