Imagining the university Ronald Barnett Invited seminar, Ljubljana, February, 2012...
-
Upload
donald-griffin -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Imagining the university Ronald Barnett Invited seminar, Ljubljana, February, 2012...
Imagining the university
Ronald Barnett Invited seminar, Ljubljana, February, [email protected]
Centre for Higher Education Studies
Sub-brand to go here
2
This talk
• ‘Imagining the University’
- an examination of the idea itself• What is it to imagine the university?• What are the forms of the imagination – in imagining the university?• What is the role of/ the possibilities for the imagination?
- and its limitations• What is its structure
– And what is its prospects?
3
A missing imagination?
Starting reflection: that the current debate as to the idea of the university is hopelessly impoverished
Dominated by considerations of the market, competition, customerisation, ‘knowledge-for-sale’, audit, regulation ..
3 tacit (or not so tacit) ideas: The Entrepreneurial University The Corporate University The Bureaucratic university
A dominant discourse NB – tensions here; perhaps even spaces.
4
Hopelessly impoverished?
• Impoverished since– Narrow, dominant
• Lacking considerations of global and even personal wellbeing; or even possibility
• Lacking a care for the potential of the university – and the challenges upon the university – in the C12
• But also ‘hopelessly’ – lacking hope; visions of the future– Hope that things could come out better for the university– Or even differently, in fundamental ways
5
Undue pessimism
• NB: pessimism not without its merits – (Joshua Dienstag)• But unremitting bleakness even within much contemporary scholarship
– ‘Commodification’– ‘Neo-liberalism’– ‘Quality regimes’– ‘Managerialism’– ‘Performativity’– ‘The regulative/ evaluative state’
• Not undue optimism • Believe matters could go better – grounded optimism• Positive possibilism• But what is possible? Not likely but possible
6
Feasible utopias
• Identifying possibilities• Not neutral • But value-laden• Utopian – probably will not be reached• But not out of reach• Already instances embryonically visible• Empirical warrant (G&D)• A muted pessimism - things could go better
7
A critical project of the imagination
• Large role for the imagination• Concept of ‘the imaginary’• Taylor – building on traditions, collective sediments• Kearney – imagination based on narratives; a psycho-phenomenology
of the imagination• Sartre – more one of building the future; of willing the future
– A strike for freedom• A critical project – identified shortcomings in the present
– Articulation of imaginative concepts - critical standards
8
Responsible anarchism
• The imagination and responsibility: a complex set of relationships
• The imagination should, firstly, be anarchic; it should fly, unconstrained, to envision new possibilities and to find a new language (new ‘conceptual grammars’ – Morley)– Guided by responsibility, responsiveness to counter-values, new ideas are created,
imagined; searching for a poetry of the university
• But then this imagination needs to be restrained by ‘responsibility’ in/to the real world: head in the clouds and feet on the ground– The anarchic imagination has to be responsible; even poets have to live in the real
world• (This amounts to an exercise in ‘imaginative critical realism’ – being real and being critical
but also being imaginative.)
9
(Some) Ideas of the university
The metaphysical universityThe research universityThe entrepreneurial universityThe neoliberal universityThe postmodern universityThe bureaucratic universityThe networked universityThe liquid universityThe therapeutic universityThe soulless universityThe ecological universityNB: the formal structure of each phrase is the same – but they vary considerably in their imaginative weight.
10
Imagining the university
• The romantic imagination• The empirical imagination• The ideological imagination• The hopeful imagination• The dystopian imagination• The utopian imagination
– ie reaching towards a structure of the imagination; And a layered structure at that.
11
The romantic imagination
• The metaphysical university• The liberal university• The civic university• The service university• The research university
12
The empirical imagination
• The bureaucratic university• The corporate university• The marketised university• The commodified university• The capitalist university• The performative university
13
The ideological imagination
• The entrepreneurial university – (The enterprise university)
• The accessible university (the ‘open’ university)• The European university• The global university• The postmodern university
14
The hopeful imagination
• The borderless university• The networked university• The liquid university [Bauman]• The supercomplex university• The therapeutic university• The edgeless university (Bradwell)
15
The dystopian imagination
• The soulless university• The subservient university• The selfish university• The self-important university
NB Problem – the dystopian university has already arrived (the ideological and the actual)
16
Ideas of the university – a framework (3 axes)1 Endorsing – Critical
2 Surface – Deep
3 Pessimism – Optimism
eg‘Entrepreneurial University’ – endorsing/ deep/ optimistic
‘Edgeless University’ – critical/ surface/ optimistic
‘Capitalistic University’ – critical/ deep/ pessimistic
17
Critical questions – and a challenge
• Can we find/ identify/ imagine ideas and forms of the university that do not succumb unduly to ideology?– After all, ‘We cannot jump out of our psychological and sociological skins’ (Gellner)
• Can we avoid undue pessimism on the one hand, and seduction by ‘the self-images of the age’ (MacIntyre) on the other hand?
• - and so we return to our initial hope/ idea of ‘feasible utopias’
Challenge – is that of imaginative ideas that are critical/ deep/ & optimistic- This is where feasible utopias would be found- Is there space for such ideas to be realised in the twenty-first century?- Or has the space for the university so shrunk that such ideas (even if they could be
forthcoming) could not be realised?
18
The utopian imagination
• The anarchic university/ the iconoclastic university• The authentic university• The dialogical university• The ecological university• The perverse university• The public university (Masschelein/ Simons)• The socialist university (Peters)• The foolish university (Kavanagh)• The wise university (Maxwell)• The virtuous university (Nixon)• The theatrical university (Parker)
19
Criteria of adequacy
- Range (theory/ ideas/ practice/ policy)- Depth (structures/ experience/ ideas)- Feasibility (power/ organization)- Ethics (flourishing – human/ organizational/ societal/ global)- Continuing possibilities/ emergent properties
Severe tests, but they will extend imaginative ideas
- and help to provide a legitimation of the imagination
- supplying potency and efficaciousness to the imagination
20
The Ecological University(or: Prospects of/ for the imagination)[A case study]• Sees itself within and as part of a global ecology • Does what it can to enable the world to flourish (not just to ‘sustain’ it)• Has a care/ concern (H) for the world• Is active/ is engaged with the world; reaches into the world• Puts its knowledges to work in the interests of the world
This imaginary university passes muster against all of the tests of adequacy (previous slide)
- of range, depth, feasibility, ethics and possible emergence.
21
Conclusion
We need to imagine the university anew (The imagination is prior to the imaginary)
We need lots of imaginative ideas – and daring, bold thinking;
identifying the best in all possible worlds: ie, utopian thinking But there is a responsibility on the imagination – to identify feasible
ideas of the university – ie, feasible utopias Feasible utopias are neither unduly optimistic nor unduly pessimistic
- but hold out critical standards against which to test emerging ‘universities’
and to steer us towards positive possibilities – positive possibilism. The university just could help us towards a better world – The imagination isn’t a sufficient condition – but it is a necessary condition.
Institute of EducationUniversity of London20 Bedford WayLondon WC1H 0AL
Tel +44 (0)20 7612 6000Fax +44 (0)20 7612 6126Email [email protected] www.ioe.ac.uk