Imaging Clinical Decision Support: The Medicare Mandate - Prepared for National Decision Support...
-
Upload
mick-brown -
Category
Healthcare
-
view
195 -
download
0
Transcript of Imaging Clinical Decision Support: The Medicare Mandate - Prepared for National Decision Support...
Imaging Clinical Decision Support: The Medicare MandatePrepared for National Decision Support Company
Imaging Performance Partnership
Erin LaneSenior AnalystImaging Performance Partnership, Advisory Board [email protected]
March 9, 2017
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
2
membership renewal rate among U.S. hospitals
of U.S. News and World Report “Honor Roll” hospitals are members
96% 100%health care memberorganizations
4,400+CEO and COOrelationships
9,500+
Through the breadth of our network andthe depth of our expertise, we forge andfind the best practices that
• Help our members set course
• Power the technologies neededto accelerate progress
• Provide the foundation forconsulting partnershipsthat transformorganizations
Start withbest practices
STRATEGY
Helping CEOs, chief marketing officers, and chief strategy officers chart course and grow their businesses.
CARE DELIVERY
Helping chief medical officers, medical group executives, network executives, and clinical leaders to shape networks, engage physicians, manage medical group performance, implement care pathways, accelerate population health efforts, and more.
OPERATIONS
Helping CFOs and COOs reboot their approach to profitability.
Then hardwire those insights into your organization with research, technology, and consulting
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
3
CDS Comprised of Two Distinct Parts
Source: Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
IT ToolElectronic platform that
makes guidelines accessible
Appropriate Use CriteriaClinical guidelines
Clinical Decision Support +=
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
4
Medicare Legislation Mandates CDS1 for ImagingProvider Requirements and Legislative Recap
Source: “Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014” Congress of the United States of America, April 1, 2014; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
1) Clinical decision support.2) Only Medicare fee-for-service.3) National provider identification number.
Legislation in Brief: Protecting Access to Medicare Act (2014)
Providers must indicate that the ordering clinician used an approved decision support mechanism to consult appropriate use criteria for all applicable outpatient advanced imaging exams for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries
Ordering Provider Requirements• Consult appropriate use criteria
(AUC) via CDS for Medicare beneficiaries2
• For outpatient advanced imaging exam (CT, MR, PET, nuclear medicine) orders
Furnishing Provider RequirementsSubmit documentation of ordering provider use on Medicare claim:
• CDS mechanism consulted• Adherence to AUC
• NPI3 of ordering professional
Imaging order
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
5
A Brief History and What’s to ComeProvider Consultation and Documentation Required by January 1, 2018
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
1) Protecting Access to Medicare Act.
Regulatory Timeline for Clinical Decision Support
April 2014 PAMA1 signed into law, requiring provider use of AUC via CDS for advanced imaging
November 2015MPFS2 CY 2016 final rule established appropriate use criteria approval process
November 2016MPFS CY 2017 final rule established CDS mechanism requirements and approval process, clinical priority areas
January 1, 2018Ordering providers must consult AUC through qualified CDS; to receive payment, furnishing must submit claims-based documentation
January 1, 2020Ordering providers identified as outliers, may be required to obtain preauthorization
Today
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
6
For the First Time, More Knowns Than UnknownsMedicare AUC Program Beginning to Taking Shape
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
CDS Components Yet to Be Determined
AUC approval process: Provider-led entities may qualify to create, modify guidelines
Vendor (mechanism) approval process: Requirements for mechanisms set; first list of approved mechanisms to be released by July 2017
Furnishing provider penalties• Imaging claims without documentation
will be denied, meaning no reimbursement for professional or technical components
• But will CMS instead implement a penalty for the first year?
Claims-based reporting• CMS must create new claims form to
enable proper documentation
Outlier provider status: How will CMS calculate outliers? How long with the outlier status remain?
Provider deadline: January 1, 2018 for ordering and furnishing providers
CDS Components Finalized More Clarification Needed
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
7
Qualified Provider-Led Entities to Create, Modify AUCAll Providers Use Criteria Developed by PLEs1 to Comply With Mandate
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
1) Provider-Led Entities.
Rather than approving individual criteria, CMS approves groups, or “provider-led entities” to create, modify, endorse AUC
Qualified PLEs As of July, 2016
American College of Cardiology Foundation
American College of Radiology
Brigham and Women’s Physician Organization
CDI Quality Institute
Intermountain Healthcare
Massachusetts General Hospital, Radiology
National Comprehensive Care Network
Society for Nuclear Medicine and MolecularImaging
University of California Medical Campuses
University of Washington Physicians
Weill Cornell Medical Physicians Organization
To comply with the mandate, ordering providers must use AUC from qualified PLEs
CMS will release list of newly approved PLEs by June 30 of every year, so the number of PLEs will grow over time
Appropriate User Criteria Basics
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
8
Becoming a Qualified PLESix Requirements, New Applications Accepted Annually
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
Provider-Led Entities Qualification Requirements
Finalized Definition for Provider-Led Entity“An organization comprised primarily of providers or practitioners who, either within the organization or outside of the organization, predominantly provide direct patient care.…all AUC developed or endorsed by that provider-led entity will be considered to be specified AUC.”
Related Deadlines
Follow robust evidentiary-review process for criteria
Publically disclose conflicts of interest
Publically post all AUCs and evidence on website
Grade criteria in terms of strength of evidence
Publically outline AUC development process
AUC development process led by multidisciplinary team(s)
Jan 1: Applications due to CMS
June 30: CMS will release list of qualified provider-led entities on website
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
9
In the Waiting Game for CDS Mechanisms Requirements Finalized and Deadline Passed but Awaiting Approved List
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
Providers must use qualified CDSM to comply with mandate
Sample CDSM Requirements Incorporates reasonable scope of AUC
Incorporates AUC from more than one qPLE
Makes AUC, support documents available
Determines appropriateness of imaging exams
Documents provider use with unique identifier
Ability to update AUC in reasonable timeframe
Stores necessary information for six years
Provides aggregate feedback annually to provider
Compiles with privacy laws requirements
CDS Mechanism Basics
Mechanisms must adhere to full set of requirements
CDSM Dates for Providers to KnowMarch 1: Application deadline for 2017 approval
June 30: CMS to publish list of approved CDSMs
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
10
Two Levels of CDSM ApprovalThe Provider’s Guide to CDSM Approval
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
Level 1: Preliminary Approval
Level 2: Full Approval
ApprovalDefinition
CDSM does not meet all requirements, but has a clear plan in place to meet all requirements by January 1, 2018
CDSM meets all requirementson date of application: March 1, 2017
Does thisCDSM meet all requirements?
• No• Submitted clear plan to meet all
requirements by January 1, 2018
Yes
Will providers using this CDSM on January 1, 2018 comply with the mandate?
• No• Preliminarily approved CDSMs
become fully approved after demonstrating adherence to all requirements
• CDSMs that cannot meet all requirements by January 1, 2018 required to notify providers
Yes
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
11
Priority Clinical Areas Used to Determine Outliers Targeted Clinical Groupings to Evolve, Expand With Time
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
1) Not included in proposed rule.2) Traumatic and non-traumatic.3) Primary or metastatic, suspected or diagnosed.
Finalized Priority Clinical Areas1 Coronary artery disease1
2 Suspected pulmonary embolism1
3 Headache2
4 Hip pain1
5 Low back pain
6 Shoulder pain1
7 Cancer of the lung3
8 Cervical or neck pain
CMS to increase number, scope of areas annually
Priority Clinical Area Used to Identify Referrer OutliersCMS will analyze imaging utilization and CDS compliance within priority clinical areas (PCAs) to identify outlier referrers by 2020 and set scope requirements for AUC in CDSMs
CMS selected diagnostic groups with highest associated advanced imaging volumes
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
12
Holding Providers Accountable for AppropriatenessProcess Penalties for Ordering Providers, Financial for Furnishing
Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS.gov; Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
1) As required by the law, but CMS has not yet finalized.
Ordering Provider Requirements• Consult appropriate use criteria (AUC)
via CDS for Medicare beneficiaries2
• For outpatient advanced imaging exam (CT, MR, PET, nuclear medicine) orders
Furnishing Provider RequirementsSubmit documentation of ordering provider use on Medicare claim:• CDS mechanism consulted
• Adherence to AUC
• NPI3 of ordering professional
Imaging order
Penalty for Noncompliance1 Penalty for Noncompliance1
Classified as an outlier, required to obtain preauthorization for Medicare patients
Claims denied and reimbursement withheld; applies to both professional and technical components
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
13
QUESTIONSErin LaneSenior AnalystImaging Performance Partnership The Advisory Board [email protected]
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
14
Best Practices for CDS Implementation Advisory Board Resources to Support Your CDS Strategy
Source: Imaging Performance Partnership interviews and analysis.
FOR ALL RESOURCES on this topic, visit advisory.com/ipp/CDS
Toolkit for Successfully Implementing Imaging Clinical Decision SupportComprehensive set of tools that map to tactics for thoughtful and effective implementation of imaging CDS
Playbook for Implementing Clinical Decision SupportThe imaging leaders guide to successful CDS implementation, including case studies from successful organizations
Imaging Clinical Decision Support: The Medicare Mandate
Thank You!Send Additional Questions to [email protected]
Erin LaneSenior AnalystImaging Performance Partnership The Advisory Board [email protected]
©2017 Advisory Board • All Rights Reserved • advisory.com
IMPORTANT: Please read the following.
Advisory Board has prepared this report for the exclusive use of its members. Each member acknowledges and agrees that this report and the information contained herein (collectively, the “Report”) are confidential and proprietaryto Advisory Board. By accepting delivery of this Report, each member agrees to abide by the terms as stated herein, including the following:
1. Advisory Board owns all right, title, and interest in and to this Report. Except as stated herein, no right, license, permission, or interest of any kind in this Report is intended to be given, transferred to, or acquired by a member. Each member is authorized to use this Report only to the extent expressly authorized herein.
2. Each member shall not sell, license, republish, or post online or otherwise this Report, in part or in whole. Each member shall not disseminate or permit the use of, and shall take reasonable precautions to prevent such dissemination or use of, this Report by (a) any of its employees and agents (except as stated below), or(b) any third party.
3. Each member may make this Report available solely to those of its employees and agents who (a) are registered for the workshop or membership program ofwhich this Report is a part, (b) require access to this Report in order to learn from the information described herein, and(c) agree not to disclose this Report to other employees or agents or any third party. Each member shall use, and shall ensure that its employees and agents use, this Report for its internal use only. Each member may make a limited number of copies, solely as adequate for use by its employees and agents in accordance with the terms herein.
4. Each member shall not remove from this Report any confidential markings, copyright notices, and/or other similar indicia herein.
5. Each member is responsible for any breach of its obligations as stated herein by any of its employees or agents.
6. If a member is unwilling to abide by anyof the foregoing obligations, then such member shall promptly return this Report and all copies thereof to Advisory Board.