Image-Boost vs. Greenwashing? Communicating the ... · 29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 6...
Transcript of Image-Boost vs. Greenwashing? Communicating the ... · 29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 6...
Image-Boost vs. Greenwashing?
Communicating the Opportunities
and Challenges of innovative
BioplasticsJulia-Maria Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 2 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Introduction: Communicating the Research Findings
regarding Bioplastics
BiNa (www.biokunststoffe-nachhaltig.de)
Julia-Maria Blesin
Project Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Wiebke Möhring(until February 2016: Hochschule Hannover; as of March 2016: TU Dortmund)
• Focusing on the public’s perception of bioplastics
• Funded by BMBF• Research models:
• website analysis • guided interviews • public opinion survey (online)
• Focusing on product
communication of bioplastics
• Funded by BMEL
• Research models:
• analysis of advertising material
• guided interviews
• Three focus groups in April & six focus
groups in May 2016
• 8 participants/group in Hannover
• Quota by age, gender, level of
education, environmental awareness
• Research focus: associations
and attitudes towards bioplastics
and products made of bioplastics
among consumers and the
general public
FNG (http://fng.ifbb-hannover.de)
Miriam Jaspersen
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 3 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Plastics Heritage: From a modern Miracle to a Threat
for the EnvironmentImage Source: Appendix
Sources: Braun, 2013; Kotte, 2014; Plastics Europe, 2015, VDI-Informationszentrum, 2015
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 4 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Plastics Heritage: Consumer Concerns about
Petroleum-based Plastics
Plastic’s
Image
Resource Basis
Fossil-based, non-
renewable Resources
Waste Disposal
Garbage
• Marine Littering
Recycling
Price
affordable
Characteristics
unhealthy
worthless
hygienic
convenient
“[…] And when one sees those pictures
of baby seals with six pack rings around
their throats… Pictures like that burn
themselves into a person‘s memory
forever.“ Jessica (33)
“[…] sometimes things smell
terrible when they‘re taken
out of the package.
Household goods, clothing,
all sorts of things...“
Dana (38)
“[…] natural resources aren‘t
infinite. At some point there
won‘t be any more oil…“
Carsten (43)
Sources: BiNa 2016a, FNG, 2016; BMEL, 2012; BMUB, 2014
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 5 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Bioplastics – The Solution?
Source: European Bioplastics
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 6 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
7.1%
36.3%
56.7%
Yes, I have heard of Bioplastics, and I knowexactly what they are.
Yes, I have heard of them before.
No, I have never heard of them.
Challenge I – Lack of Awareness
We would like to find out, if you’ve ever heard of
Bioplastics? (BiNa, 2016b, Online-Access-Panel; n=1673)
The quantitative and qualitative survey results are coherent and
complement one another.
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 7 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
• Organic cultivation of raw
materials („bio“)
• Use of plant-based residual
material
• Oil conservation
Waste reduction through
composting
Plant-based raw materials
Associations with
Bioplastics
Resulting
Expectations
regarding Bioplastics
in general
Insufficient Familiarity with Bioplastics
Challenge II – High expectations which reality is
unable to fulfill
Biodegradable
• „Non-toxic“ & non-hazardous products
• Environmentally friendly & fair working conditions
• „Product upgrade“: Reduction of negative characteristics & emphasis on
functionality (e.g. enhanced portability, odorless)
Resulting
Expectations
regarding the
Products
Possible
ReactionsUNCERTAINTYACCEPTANCE
INFORMATION INPUT ABOUT STATUS QUO
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 8 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Challenge II – High expectations which reality is
unable to fulfill
Possible
Reactions
UNCERTAINTY
• Concerns about competition
with food sources
• Suspicion of „greenwashing“
• Disappointment with product
• No effect on product selection
ACCEPTANCE
• Endorsed by Research &
Development
• Recognition as an alternative
• Influence on product selection
INFORMATION INPUT ABOUT STATUS QUO
„[…] misuse of food sources, because corn and
other types of plants are used for Bioplastics.“
Katharina (23)
„What‘s ‚bio‘ about that? It
contaminates the earth too.“
Carsten (43)
„I would have thought that
Bioplastics were more
environmentally friendly, because
they are biodegradable. Now I‘m a
bit shocked.“ Peter (62)
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 9 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Associations with
Bioplastics
Resulting
Expectations
regarding Bioplastics
in general
Insufficient Familiarity with Bioplastics
Challenge III – Prevailing low Expectations
„The consumer pays
the bill.“
Resulting
Expectations
regarding the
Products
Short-lived
„Bio“ = expensive
• Fossil resources less
expensive than
renewable resources
• Industry investment
necessary
Biodegradable
• More brittle and
damageable
• Less appealing
visually
Possible
ReactionsUNCERTAINTYACCEPTANCE
INFORMATION INPUT ABOUT STATUS QUO
„It would probably be
expensive to develop and
thus ultimately expensive for
the end-user.“ Philip (25)
„It‘s possible that bioplastics
are not as durable,
as I would like.“ Farid (47)
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 10 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
The Consumer’s Viewpoint: How to communicate
more effectively…
Seite 10
• Accurate information based on facts
(not generic, stereotypical slogans)
• By offering more intensive and detailed
information platforms
• By communicating the central
message: „Without crude oil“
• By keeping the public informed on R&D
• By avoiding exaggerated, sermonizing
communication
III III
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 11 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Conclusion: Image-Boost vs. Greenwashing? It’s not
just a question of communication...
Seite 11
III III
Plastic’s
Image
Resource Basis
Fossil-based, non-renewable
Resources
Waste Disposal
Recycling
(Marine) Littering
Price
afford-able
Character-istics
unhealthy
worthless
hygienic
convenient
• Consumers perceive
potentials associated with
characteristics such as
„biodegradable“ and „bio-
based“
• The challenge for the
stakeholders is to create
the right conditions for
capitalizing on this potential
• Effective communication
campaigns can fulfill a
support-/mediation-function
in achieving this end
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 12 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Conclusion: Main Objectives regarding Communication
with Consumers
WHAT?
Increase Familiarity and general
Knowledge
HOW?
Reduce complexity
Seite 12
Establish realistic Expectations
and Acceptability
Dispel incorrect expectations – both
positive and negative
Communicate decisive advantages,
e.g. organic basis and its
independence from petroleum
Provide transparency regarding the
social and ecological sustainability with
respect to LCA/SLCA
Introduce alternate terms
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 13 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
We would like to thank you for your attention!
Prof. Dr. Wiebke Möhring
Julia-Maria Blesin, M. A
Miriam Jaspersen, Dipl.Medienwiss.
Hochschule Hannover
Expo Plaza 12
30539 Hannover
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 14 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Bibliography
• Braun, D. (2013). Kleine Geschichte der Kunststoffe. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
• BiNa (2016a). Ergebnisse von Gruppendiskussionen zur Bevölkerungswahrnehmung von Biokunststoffen im April 2016.
Unveröffentlichte Studie an der Hochschule Hannover.
• BiNa (2016b). Ergebnisse einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Online-Acces-Panelbefragung im Juli 2016. Unveröffentlichte
Studie an den Hochschulen Hannover und Weihenstephan-Triesdorf.
• Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (2012). GfK-Umfrage im Auftrag des BMEL zu biobasiertem
Wirtschaften. Checked October 10th 2016 under http://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Landwirtschaft/Bioenergie-
NachwachsendeRohstoffe/BiobasierteWirtschaftInfomappe/INFOTEXT_Umfrage.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
• Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit und Umweltbundesamt (2014). Umweltbewusstsein in
Deutschland 2014. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage.
Checked October 10th 2016 under http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/umweltbewusstsein-in-deutschland-2014
• FNG (2016). Ergebnisse von Gruppendiskussionen zur Konsumentenwahrnehmung von Biokunststoffprodukten im Mai 2016.
Unveröffentlichte Studie an der Hochschule Hannover.
• Kotte, H.-H. (2014). Die Wiederkehr des Verdrängten. Warum greifen wir beim Plastik immer noch so gerne zu? Interview mit
einem Konsumexperten. In: Fluter (52), S. 18–21. Checked October 10th 2016 under http://www.fluter.de/de/139/thema/13153/
• Plastics Europe (2015). Plastics – the Facts 2015. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. Last
checked October 10th 2016 under http://www.plasticseurope.org/documents/document/20151216062843-
plastics_the_facts_2015_final_30pages_14122015.pdf
• VDI Technologiezentrum GmbH (Hrsg.) (2015). Plastik in der Umwelt – Quellen, Senken und Lösungsansätze, Mögliche
Handlungsfelder für die Forschung. Last checked October 10th 2016 under http://
http://www.fona.de/mediathek/pdf/Plastik_in_der_Umwelt_Forschung.pdf
29.11.2016 / Plastics Heritage / Slide 15 Julia Blesin, Miriam Jaspersen & Wiebke Möhring
Image Sources
Slide 1:
- PLA Rezyklat, Marina Mudersbach, http://ifbb.wp.hs-hannover.de/bina/
Slide 3:
- left: http://www.nwhm.org/blog/throwbackthursday-vintage-commercials-and-advertisements-part-2/
- right: Midway: Message from the Gyre (2009 – Current), Chris Jordan,
http://www.chrisjordan.com/gallery/midway/#CF000313%2018x24
Slide 5:
- http://www.european-bioplastics.org/bioplastics/materials/