Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

14
Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki

Transcript of Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Page 1: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Image and interface

Pertti SaariluomaUniversity of Helsinki

Page 2: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Visualization and mind

• Visualization makes difficultly perceivable things conceivable by making required information visible

• Ability to see the essence of the message• Ability to represent all necessary details• Suggestions from the below• Visualization is an interaction process

between interface and image in mind

Page 3: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Subgoals for visualization

• Organising interaction in visualization has several subgoals

• Identification, localization, categorization. clustering, ordering, comparing associating

• Data transformation: abstraction, magnifying, minimizing, speeding up, slowing, looking through, and constructing

Page 4: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Challenges for visualization

• The power of visualization is in making easier to comprehend complex issues

• Task analysis and cognitive processes

• Myth of perception

• What are the true psychological preconditions of various types of visualization situations?

Page 5: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Criterion of challenge

• The ultimate goal of visualization is to decrease number of human errors. Consequently, the ultimate challenge is to organise interaction as ergonomic as possible

• What kind of performance limits are associated to various types of cognitive processes?

Page 6: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Perceptual preconditions

• Perception and attention

• Perception = a coloured three dimensional space with moving objects

• Luminance, brightness, contrast, colour sensitivity depth cues, movement

• Attention – capacity and discrimination

Page 7: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Limits of memory

• Working memory capacity and modularity

• Chunking• -----------------------------------------------

•  

• Easy Difficult

•  

• X X X

• X X

• X X

• X X X

• X

• X

• X X

• X X

•  

Page 8: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Modularity and skill

• What is modularity?

• Visuospatial and articulatory

• Long term working memory and skill

• Training users and transfer

• Memory load by main task and secondary tasks: Navigation

• capacity explainable errors

Page 9: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Apperception and error

• All errors are not caused by capacity limits

• Content-errors are not explainable by limited capacity but by incorrect presuppositions

• Perceiving non-perceivable

• Interpretation

Page 10: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

  

Page 11: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

From perception to apperception

• Do we perceive representations?

• Atom, infinity, eternal, possible

• Representations are constructed of conceptual information, which is used to interpret perceptual environment

• How to incorporate conceptual knowledge to visualizations?

Page 12: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Symbolic and functional

• Symbols in visualizations have semiotic functions (red for a high termperature and crises)

• What is functional or sense-making?• Wholes as ’meaningful’ combinations of

objects• Why some whole has the elements it has?• How to visualize functional structures?

Page 13: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Interaction and construction

The functional organisation of human representations put forward a number of challenges

What kind of constructive tools? What is relevant?

An example of dimensionality and conceptual compression

Page 14: Image and interface Pertti Saariluoma University of Helsinki.

Effective visualization

• All knowledge that is needed in interaction but no more

• Conceptual clarity

• Effective tools

• Clear understanding of the limits of the tools and the tacit presuppositions