Illinois Interchange Illinois Interchange Spring2009...

IllinoisInterchangeI l l i n o i s T e c h n o l o g y T r a n s f e r C e n t e r

Vol. 17 No. 1 Spring Issue 2009

Please pass this on to otherinterested parties in your office.

INSIDE:IDOT WelcomesNew Secretary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2

Pavement Preservationwith Stimulus Funds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

Engineer of the Year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

Technician of the Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7

IACE Engineers of the Year . . . . . . . . . .8

Safety Projects with ARRA. . . . . . . . . . . .9

Worker Visibility Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10

T2 Training Class Survey. . . . . . . . . . . . . .11

The American Recovery andReinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009was enacted on February 17, 2009 andprovided $936 million of highway andbridge funds to Illinois. Of that amount,30 percent was required to be sub-allocated within the state to localagencies. Therefore, $281 million wasdistributed within the state of Illinoisto local entities, while $627 millionwas provided to the Illinois Departmentof Transportation (IDOT) for statetransportation projects. In addition,Illinois received another $28 millionfor transportation enhancement proj-ects throughout the state.The ARRAmandated that each

state’s sub-allocations to the localagencies follow the existing law ofTitle 23, United States Code (U.S.C.)subsection 133(d)(3)(A), subsection133(d)(3)(B) and subsection 133(d)(3)(D), resulting in the $281 mil-lion of local sub-allocations beingsplit as follows:

• $203 million for urbanized areasover 200,000 in population, and• $78 million for urbanized areasand other areas less than or equalto 200,000 in population.

The $203 million was furthersub-allocated per ARRA as follows:• Chicago $175,253,358• Round Lake Beach $4,679,631*• Rockford $6,111,395• Rock Island/Quad Cities $3,140,381• Peoria $5,586,123• East St. Louis/Metro-East $8,077,088

*To be included with the Chicago alloca-tion for administrative purposes. [Eventhough Round Lake Beach does not havea population over 200,000, the 2000Census identified a bi-state TransportationManagement Area (TMA) centered aroundRound Lake Beach. While no specific entitywas actually identified as seeking thisseparate TMA designation, the Federal

By Leigh Ann Lareau, IDOT, Bureau of Local Roads and Streets

Continued on page 2

Illinois Interchange2 Spring 2009

On February 28, 2009 Governor Pat Quinn named Gary HannigSecretary of the Illinois Department of Transportation, overseeing personnelengaged in all facets, aspects and modes of transportation in Illinois.

Gary Hannig was born July 22, 1952 in Litchfield, Illinois. He wasraised in Mt. Olive, Illinois where he attended Holy Trinity Catholic GradeSchool and Mt. Olive Community High School. Before graduating from Mt.Olive High School in 1970, Gary was selected as a member of the prestigiousNational Honor Society.

Gary attended the University of Illinois in Champaign, where he gradu-ated with honors with a degree in Accounting in 1974. In 1975, he passed the

exam to become a Certified Public Accountant.In 1978 Gary Hannig was elected as the youngest member of the Illinois House of Representatives at that

time. He has served as a member in every General Assembly until he resigned in February 2009.Gary was appointed Assistant Democratic Leader for the 89th General Assembly and Deputy Majority

Leader for the 94th General Assembly. He was the Chief Budget Negotiator for the House Democrats.

Highway Administration (FHWA) still hadto recognize this designation. Eventually,agreements were signed so that the ChicagoMetropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP),which is the Chicago urbanized area met-ropolitan planning organization (MPO),retained planning responsibilities for theIllinois portion of the TMA, and theSoutheast Wisconsin Regional PlanningCommission (SEWRPC) retained plan-ning responsibilities in Wisconsin. Untilthe next Census is completed, Round LakeBeach will continue to be identified asreceiving its own appropriation, althoughin reality it is to be included with theChicago TMA sub-allocation].

Of the remaining $78 million forlocal agencies, $45 million was sub-allocated to urban areas with popula-tions between 5,000 and 200,000.This sub-allocation was based onpopulation.

The last $33 million was distrib-uted among the rural areas of thestate which consisted of the ninety-six downstate Illinois counties (this

excluded Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake,McHenry, and Will counties).Municipalities with populations lessthan 5,000 and townships can coordi-nate with the counties for use of the$33 million available for rural areas.These rural funds were distributedbased on 1) non-urban population, 2)non-urban area (square miles), and 3)non-urban centerline mileage.

IDOT, with guidance from theFederal Highway Administration(FHWA), utilized the same factors fordistribution of the ARRA funds as areused in the annual allotment of feder-al Surface Transportation Program(STP) funds to local agencies. Thesefactors have been in use since 1991in distributing both the rural andurban allotments to local agencies inIllinois and have been agreed uponby the metropolitan planning organi-zations (MPOs), county engineersand municipalities within the state.

For a list of the ARRA dollaramounts provided to each local

agency in Illinois, please access thefollowing website: www.dot.il.gov/stimulus/fundingsplits.html.

The ARRA funds are being pro-vided at a 100% funding ratio, withno local match required. However,the transportation enhancement fundswill be provided at an 80% feder-al/20% local match ratio; the localagency will be required to providethe 20% match utilizing local funds.

The federal economic stimulusfunds are not grants to be givendirectly to local agencies. Thesefunds will be received through areimbursable process, whereby eitherIDOT or the local agency providesthe initial funding required for eachproject. To be eligible for federalreimbursement, work on a projectcannot begin until federal authoriza-tion. Once FHWA has authorized thefunds for the project and work isactually under way, IDOT requests

Continued from page 1

IDOT Welcomes New SecretaryGARY HANNIG

Continued on page 3

Illinois InterchangeSpring 2009 3

and receives reimbursement from thefederal government for the federalshare of the project. FHWA willreimburse 100% of these funds to thestate or local agency only after evi-dence is shown that expenditureswere conducted within federal regu-lations (including environmental,labor, etc.).

The ARRA funds have the same

eligibility requirements for utilizationas regular STP funds. Even thoughthe ARRA is intended to be accom-plished within a limited timeframe, thesame federal guidelines and proce-dures for the use of federal funds willbe required. FHWA will not imple-ment any shortcuts for expediencythroughout the various phases of thefunded projects. Any phase of a proj-ect is eligible to use the ARRA funds.

Highway construction projectsutilizing stimulus funds will still needto be located on federal-aid routesfunctionally classified as urban col-lectors, rural major collectors orhigher. These federal-aid stimulus

funds cannot be used on roads func-tionally classified as local roads orrural minor collectors except in thefollowing circumstances:• Bridges on public roads of anyfunctional classification;• Carpool projects, fringe and cor-ridor parking facilities, bicycletransportation and pedestrianwalkways, and public sidewalksto comply with the Americans

with Disabilities Act of 1990;• Safety infrastructure projects;• Transportation enhancement projects.Each project that has not beenpreviously published in the IDOTMulti-Year HighwayImprovement Program will have to

be amended to the current StatewideTransportation Improvement Program(STIP) in order to meet public involve-ment policies for federal authorization:• If a project is in an MPO area, itmust be included in that MPO’sTransportation ImprovementProgram (TIP).

• For projects in non-MPO areas,the process requires the lead localagency to publish the project in alocal publication (i.e., newspaper)for a 15-day public commentperiod. After the 15-day timeframe,IDOT is notified of any publiccomments and then coordinateswith FHWA to approve this proj-ect to be amended into the cur-rent STIP.

The necessary state appropriation(authority to spend) for the federalARRA funds being provided toIllinois was signed into law byGovernor Quinn on April 3, 2009 asPublic Act 096-0004.

The ARRA funds sub-allocated tothe local agencies must be federallyauthorized by March 3, 2010 (whichis one year from the date of appor-tionment of the funds by FHWA toIllinois), or they will be redistributedto other states that can use the funds.

Continued from page 2


This federal definition has beenconfused with the Local AgencyPavement Preservation (LAPP)Policy that was issued by CBLRS onDecember 30, 1993 (now containedin Section 33-4 of the BLRSManual). The LAPP Policy addressesthe repair and resurfacing of existingroadways and is intended to providean interim improvement until rehabil-itation or reconstruction may befunded. Form BLR 33410 is used forproject approval. The LAPP policy isintended for functional hot-mixasphalt (HMA) overlays and does notmeet the current federal definition ofpavement preservation. Therefore,pavement preservation projectsshould not be submitted usingBLR33410. However, HMA overlays

The Central Bureau of Local Roads& Streets (CBLRS) has receivedmany questions concerning the use ofAmerican Recovery and ReinvestmentAct of 2009 (ARRA) on pavementpreservation projects. This article isintended to provide general guidanceand to clarify existing policies regardingpavement preservation. However,agencies should continue to workwith closely with their District Bureauof Local Roads & Streets (DBLRS)to ensure all ARRA projects meetfederal guidelines and deadlines.

The Federal Highway Admin-istration (FHWA) issued a memoran-dum on September 12, 2005 to definepavement preservation eligibility forfederal funding.

“Pavement Preservation is ‘a programemploying a network level, long-termstrategy that enhances pavement perform-ance by using an integrated, cost-effectiveset of practices that extend pavement life,improve safety and meet motorist expecta-tions.’ (Source: FHWA PavementPreservation Expert Task Group)

An effective pavement preservation pro-gram will address pavements while theyare still in good condition and before theonset of serious damage. By applying acost-effective treatment at the right time,the pavement is restored almost to its orig-inal condition. The cumulative effect ofsystematic, successive preservation treat-ments is to postpone costly rehabilitationand reconstruction. During the life of apavement, the cumulative discount value ofthe series of pavement preservation treat-ments is substantially less than the dis-counted value of the more extensive, high-er cost of reconstruction and generallymore economical than the cost of majorrehabilitation. Additionally, performing aseries of successive pavement preservationtreatments during the life of a pavement isless disruptive to uniform traffic flow thanthe long closures normally associated withreconstruction projects.”

under the LAPP Policy are eligiblefor ARRA funding.

The key point of the federal defi-nition is “the cumulative effect ofsystematic, successive preservationtreatments.”Since 2005, the CBLRShas been allowing counties to partici-pate in a pilot pavement preservationprogram with federal funds. In orderto be eligible, a county must requestparticipation from the DBLRS byproviding:• the condition rating of all high-ways included in the pavementpreservation program;• a ten year program estimatedetailing types of treatments andtypical treatment timings; and• a detailed 2 year plan with esti-mated treatment costs.

PAVEMENT PRESERVATION WITH STIMULUS FUNDSKevin Burke III, P.E., IDOT Local Policy & Technology Engineer

Continued on page 5

Illinois Interchange

Spring 2009 5

Several pavement preservationtreatments may be eligible for ARRAfunding even when performed out-side of an approved pavement preser-vation program.• Thin HMA Overlays• Ultra-thin Whitetopping• Ultra-thin Friction Course• In-Place Recycling (Hot and Cold)

• Mill and Fill• Microsurfacing• Cape Seal

Most of these treatments are con-sidered minor rehabilitation and/or

FHWA divides a pavementpreservation program into three com-ponents: preventive maintenance,minor rehabilitation (non structural),and routine maintenance activities asseen in figure 1. Types of treatmentsmay include thin overlays, in-placerecycling, surface treatments, andcrack sealing. With dedicated fundingfor a pavement preservation program,highway agencies are able to com-bine these treatments over a period ofyears. As a result, highway agenciesshould see an increase in overall con-dition rating of their system.

were approved for federal funding byCBLRS before FHWA adopted thecurrent pavement preservation defini-tion. Agencies should continue toprovide a list of projects to theDBLRS as early as possible to verifyeligibility under ARRA funds.

For more information concerningpavement preservation please visitthe National Center for PavementPreservation atwww.pavementpreservation.org.

Cold In-Place Recycling (CIR) with Foamed Asphalt


6 Spring 2009

Brooks Brestal has been managing and coordi-nating Illinois’ efforts in the New MississippiRiver Bridge Project. Brooks was instrumentalin the development of various programmingand engineering options that led to an eventualsigning of the Bi-State Agreement betweenIllinois and Missouri. His leadership skills hasprovided the Department the ability to finishoff the environmental evaluation required tomove the Mississippi River Bridge project tothe design phase. With the reputation and abili-ty to get things done, Brooks was assignedsolely to this project with a focus of deliveringthe project.

BROOKS BRESTALMississippi River BridgeDistrict 8, Bureau of Program Development

ENGINEER OF THE YEAR NOMINEESVince Cirrintano, Region 1/District 1

Trisha Thompson, Region 2/District 2

Greg S. Lee, Region 2/District 3

Heather Z. Shoup, Region 3/District 4

Jeffrey L. Allen, Region 3/District 5

Rick Walker, Region 4/District 6

David P. Macklin, Region 4/District 7

Ryan Guthman, Region 5/District 9

James P. Allen, Safety Engineering, Central Office


Spring 2009 7

Chad assisted with department response on four majorevents in 2008. In January 2008, Chad helped coordinatethe department cleanup in Pike and Scott counties after amajor ice storm. Then that spring, Chad worked alongemergency responders to set up a traffic detour after amajor railroad derailment near Barry, Illinois. Chad devel-oped an emergency repair plan and oversaw day laborefforts in response to a significant slide that closed IL 13for over a month in the summer. In June 2008, as a resultof major flooding on the Mississippi, Chad was instru-mental in the construction of a temporary roadway on IL136 into Iowa from Hamilton, Illinois. Finally, in the fall,Chad coordinated the work needed to set up pumps and sandbags necessary to prevent flooding in the town of Frederickwhen the Illinois River experienced flooding.

CHAD TODDResponse to Natural Disasters and IncidentsDistrict 6, Bureau of Operations

TECHNICIAN OF THE YEAR NOMINEESMark Schwabe, Region 1/District 1

Derek J. Griffith, Region 2/District 2

Steve Mellendorf, Region 2/District 3

Jackie Schertz, Region 3/District 4

Kathleen A. McConnell, Region 3/District 5

Raymond S. Warner, Region 4/District 7

Tom Shank, Region 5/District 8

Julie Klamm, Region 5/District 9

Ryan K. McLean, Materials & PhysicalResearch, Central Office


Each year the Illinois Association of County Engineers (IACE) recognizes certain members who excel at being active inthe IACE, take a leadership role in their community, and are exemplary in their work for county government. The selec-tion for the award is based on a vote by the recipient’s peers who are the IACE members in each respective zone. Theyear’s awards were presented at the 95th Annual T.H.E. Conference which was recently held at the University of IllinoisChampaign-Urbana’s campus on February 24th and 25th, 2009.

The 2008 IACE Zone I Engineer is Joseph R. Korpalski. Joe received his B.S.in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of Wisconsin –Madison in 1990. He worked as an engineer for the Illinois Department ofTransportation, Region 1/District 1, for ten years before his first appointmentas County Engineer for McHenry County in 2001. Outside of his professionalduties, he is a member of the National and Illinois Society of ProfessionalEngineers, National and Illinois Association of County Engineers, AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers and American Public Works Association.

The 2008 Zone II Engineer is Calvin Hance. Calvin received a B.S. in CivilEngineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1971. He worked forMarion and Logan Counties and for IDOT before being appointed MorganCounty Engineer in 1979.

The 2008 Zone III Engineer is Jeffrey M. Jones. Earned BS degree in CivilEngineering at the University of Illinois after transferring from SoutheasternIllinois College. After a year stint with Amax Coal Company, he worked forbridge and paving contractor Superior Structures Inc. as construction superin-tendent and plant manager. Jeff was appointed as Saline County Superintendentof Highways on December 1, 1984 and has served continuously since.

IACE ENGINEERS OF THE YEAR

IACE University of Illinois Scholarship WinnersEach year the Illinois Association of county Engineers awards scholarships to existing University of Illinois Civil

Engineering students. The Transportation Group at UIUC I am pleased to announce that the followingfour students have been selected as recipients for the 2009 IACE Scholarships:

Robert L. Bates, Junior, CEE/Transportation • Dixon High School, Dixon ILAlexander S. Brand, Junior, CEE/Transportation • Downers Grove High School

Pamela Gronkowski, Sophomore, CEE/Transportation • McAuley Liberal Arts High SchoolAmanda Koenig, Junior, CEE/Transportation • Mokena, IL


Highway construction projects utiliz-ing stimulus funds will need to belocated on federal-aid routes func-tionally classified as urban collectors,rural major collectors or higher.However, since ARRA funds are tobe implemented using federal SurfaceTransportation Program (STP) fund-ing guidelines, safety projects on anypublic road are eligible for the stimu-lus funds. While no additional ARRAfunds are available, local agenciesmay have a small percentage of theirARRA allocations left for safetyimprovements; or local agencies mayelect to do a more substantial systemwide safety project. Following is abrief description of possible projects.

Sign upgrades to meet the newretro-reflectivity requirements are eli-gible for all local roads as a safetyimprovement. Counties that rankedlow or ineligible agencies (munici-palities with populations > 5,000people) in the Illinois Department ofTransportation’s Rural Sign UpgradeProgram may consider use of ARRAfunds at 100%. Agencies selecting touse ARRA funds for sign upgrade mustcomply with the Rural Sign UpgradeProgram requirements includinginventory approval, installation ofnew safety enhancement signage,replacing only regulatory and warn-ing non-retroreflective signs, andinstalling signs upon delivery.

Low cost, system wide improve-ments are eligible as safety projectson all local roads. In urban areas, thismay include corridor signal upgradesfor one signal per lane or increasedsignal size, pedestrian countdowns,and reflective signal back plates toenhance visibility. In rural areas,agencies may consider curve

enhancement with shoulder widening,chevron installation, edge or center-line rumble strips or stripes, andsuper elevation correction.Conducting a Road SafetyAssessment (RSA) may help identifyimprovements that will work well foryour system.

Promotion of safety in all ARRAprojects is encouraged by FHWA.Therefore, consider the followingpotential safety projects as additions

to other work: upgrade guardrail endterminal as part of a resurfacing proj-ect; use enhanced signing, signalmodernization or pavement markingsas part of an intersection reconstruc-tion; or accommodate all users(motorists, pedestrian, and bicyclists)in projects.

Please contact the Bureau ofSafety Engineering for more safetyideas or for assistance in selectingprojects using ARRA funds.

SAFETY PROJECTS WITH AMERICAN RECOVERY ANDREINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA)James P. Allen, P.E., IDOT Bureau of Safety Engineering

Two-Direction Large Arrow Sign (W1-7) before and after sign upgrade.


teers. Law enforcement personnel arealso required to comply when direct-ing traffic and investigating crashes.Fire fighters have some exceptions,as well.High-visibility safety garmentsmeans personal protective safetyclothing that is intended to provideconspicuity in daytime and nighttimeusage, and meets the PerformanceClass 2 or 3 requirements of theANSI/ISEA 107-2004 publicationtitled “American National Standardfor High-Visibility Safety Appareland Headwear.”Many of you may ask, what are therules when I’m not on a federal-aidhighway? There is a proposed revi-sion to the 2009 update of theManual for Uniform Traffic ControlDevices (MUTCD) that will require

Wearing a high-visibility vest hasalways been a good idea. Now, inmost cases, it’s the law.The Code of Federal RegulationsTitle 23, Part 634 established policyfor use of vests. Effective November24th, 2008, workers within the rightof way of a federal-aid highway whoare exposed either to traffic or con-struction equipment are required towear high-visibility safety garments.The rule also established definitionsof who workers are, and what a high-visibility garment is.A worker means people on footwhose duties place them within theright of way. This includes highwayconstruction and maintenance work-ers, survey crews, utility crews, allresponders to incidents, tow opera-tors, and Adopt-A-Highway volun-

all workers within the public right ofway to wear an ANSI Class 2 or 3garment. So, whether you are work-ing on a major collector, or out in thesticks, vests are going to become apart of our work apparel.The good news is compliance is easy.ANSI 107 High-visibility vests areinexpensive, made in all sizes, andare even available in tear-away con-figuration for those working aroundequipment. Law enforcement person-nel are allowed to wear the ANSI 207Public Safety Vest, which is shorterin length to allow access to items ontheir belt.If you have any questions, contactMarshall Metcalf with the IDOTBureau of Safety Engineering at(217) 782-8608.

WORKER VISIBILITY RULEBy Marshall Metcalf, IDOT, Bureau of Safety Engineering

IL DOT conducts a RSA on a township road.


T2 TRAINING CLASS SURVEYIt’s Time to Plan the 2009-2010 Training Program

The Bureau of Local Roads and Streets’ Technology Transfer Center is soliciting local agency interest in classes forthe October 2009 to April 2010 training program. Please look over the list and indicate those classes of interest to youor your personnel by filling in the blank with an approximate number of attendees your agency would send if the classeswere available in your area. This solicitation will be used by the Center in scheduling the 2009-2010 training program.Every effort will be made to locate specific classes in areas showing the most interest. Classes lacking in interest willbe dropped from this year’s schedule.

Please complete this class interest survey and mail or fax it to the Center at (217) 785-7296 by June 30, 2009.If you have questions regarding class content, please call the Center at (217) 785-2350.

Bridge Construction Inspection (2 days)

Bridge Inventory Documentation (1 day)

Bridge Piling (1 day)

Bridge Repair (1 day)

Bridge Safety Inspection (1 day)

Colors (1 day) (prerequisite before taking classes below)

• Managing People Effectively (1 day)

• Team Building (1 day)

• Cultural Diversity (1 day)

• Conflict Resolution (1 day)

Confined Space Awareness (2 hours)

Const. Materials Insp. Documentation (1 day)

Culvert Hydraulics (1/2 day)

Context Sensitive Solutions (1/2 day)

Documentation (3 days)

Erosion Control (1 day)

Flagger Training (1/2 day)

Hazardous Material-First Responder Awareness (1 day)HEC-RAS (3 days)

Highway Jurisdiction/Transfers (1 day)

Highway Signing (1 day)

Highway Engineering Principles (1 day)

Low Cost Safety Improvement Workshop (1 day)

MFTAccounting and Auditing (1 day)

MUTCD (1 day)

OSHA 10-Hour General Industry (1.5 days)

Pavement Construction Inspection (3 days)

Pavement Maintenance (1 day)

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) (1day)Rehab of Streets & Highways Seminar (1 day)

Response Handbook for Incidents, Disasters (1/2 day)

Seal Coats (1 day)

Small Drainage Structure Const. Insp. (2 days)

Snow & Ice Control (1/2 day)

Street Sweeping (1 day)

Structure Info & Management Systems (SIMS) (1 day)

Surveying I-Beginning (3 days)

Surveying II-Intermediate (4 days)

Surveying III-Construction Staking (3 days)

Surveying IV-Map GPS & St. Pl. Coord. (2 days)

Team Building (1 day)

Traffic Signal Maintenance (1 day)

Trenching & Shoring Safety (2 hours)

Work Zone Safety-Crews (1/2 day)

Work Zone Safety-Design (1 day)

Understanding Specifications (1 day)

Urban Storm Mitigation/Tree Damage (1 day)

Additional Classes

Contact Person

Agency

Phone Number Zip

The Technology Transfer (T2) Program is a nationwide effort financed jointly bythe Federal Highway Administration and individual state departments of trans-portation. Its purpose is to transfer the latest state-of-the-art technology in theareas of roads and bridges by translating the technology into terms understood

by local and state highway or transportation personnel.

The Illinois Interchange is published quarterly by the Illinois Technology TransferCenter at the Illinois Department of Transportation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations presented in this newsletter are those of the authors and do not necessarily

reflect views of the Illinois Department of Transportation, or the Federal HighwayAdministration. Any product mentioned in the Illinois Interchange is for informational

purposes only and should not be considered a product endorsement.

Illinois Technology Transfer CenterIllinois Department of Transportation

2300 South Dirksen Parkway - Room 205, Springfield, IL 62764Fax (217) 785-7296

E-mail us at [email protected]

Local Policy & Technology EngineerKEVIN BURKE

[email protected] • (217) 785-5048

Training and Graphics SpecialistAMY NEALE


Training Development TechnicianROY WILLIAMSON


Visit our website at www.dot.il.gov/blr/t2center.html

State of IllinoisPat Quinn, GovernorIllinois Department of TransportationBureau of Local Roads and Streets

T2 ADVISORY COMMITTEEThomas E. Klasner

(Chairman)County Engineer, Jersey County

201 West Pearl, P.O. Box 427, Jerseyville, IL 62025(618) 498-5571

Douglas BishopCounty Engineer, Perry County

3698 State Route 13/127, Pinckneyville, IL 62274(618) 357-6556

Ron JohnsonHighway Commissioner

St. Charles Township (Kane County)1725 Dean Street, St. Charles, IL 60174

(630) 584-3496

Olen KiblerHighway Commissioner

Newman Township (Douglas County)608 North Howard, Newman, IL 61942

(217) 837-2723

Pam BroviakDirector of Public Works

City of LaSalle745 Second St., LaSalle, IL 61301

(815) 223-9508

VacantDirector of Public Works

Brian A. PfeiferAsset Management Program Specialist

Federal Highway Administration3250 Executive Park Drive, Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 492-4281Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, 0654-09, 04/09, 4,325

Illinois Interchange Illinois Interchange Spring2009...

Documents

Transcript of Illinois Interchange Illinois Interchange Spring2009...