ILC accelerator related R&D in Japan 2 nd ASIA ILC R&D Seminar at KNU, Daegu, Korea
ILC Accelerator
description
Transcript of ILC Accelerator
ILC Accelerator
Kaoru Yokoya (KEK)2013.12.13 KIAS
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 1
TDR• Global TDR Event on Jun.12.2013• TokyoCERNFNAL• TDR handed to LCC Director Lyn Evans
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 2
Site Down-selection• Down selection to
Kitakami site announded in August end
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 3
ILC Layout
• Electron source• Positron source• Damping Rings
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 4
• RTML• Main linacs• BDS
ILC Parameters (TDR Executive Summary)L Upgrade
A BCenter- of- mass energy ECM GeV 250 350 500 500 1000 1000Collision rate frep Hz 5 5 5 5 4 4Electron linac rate Hz 10 5 5 5 4 4Number of bunches nb 1312 1312 1312 2625 2450 2450Bunch population nb x1010 2 2 2 2 1.74 1.74Bunch separation Dtb ns 554 554 554 366 366 366Pulse current Ibeam mA 5.8 5.8 5.8 8.8 7.6 7.6Main linac average gradient MV/ m 14.7 21.4 31.5 31.5Average total beam power Pbeam MW 5.9 7.3 10.5 21 27.2 27.2Estimated AC power PAC MW 1221) 121 163 204 300 300RMS bunch length sz mm 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.225Electron RMS energy spreadDp/ p % 0.19 0.158 0.124 0.124 0.083 0.085Positron RMS energy spreadDp/ p % 0.152 0.1 0.07 0.07 0.043 0.047Electron polarization P- % 80 80 80 80 80 80Positron polarization P+ % 30 30 30 30 20 20Horizontal emittance gex
mm 10 10 10 10 10 10Vertical emittance gey nm 35 35 35 35 30 30IP horizontal beta function b*
x mm 13 16 11 11 22.6 11IP vertical beta function b*
y mm 0.41 0.34 0.48 0.48 0.25 0.23IP RMS horizontal beam sizes*
x nm 729 683.5 474 474 481 335IP RMS vartical beam size s*
y nm 7.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 2.8 2.7Luminosity L x1034/ cm2s 0.75 1 1.8 3.6 3.6 4.9Fraction of L in top 1% L0.01/ L % 87.1 77.4 58.3 87.1 59.2 44.5Average energy loss dBS % 0.97 1.9 4.5 4.5 5.6 10.5Number of pairs/ bunch crossing x103 62.4 93.6 139 139 200.5 382.6Total pair energy/ bunch crossing TeV 46.5 115 344.1 344.1 1338 3441
1) 129MW for 250GeV machine
Baseline 500GeV Machine Energy Upgrade
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 5
Main Linac• Key area of ILC
– ~2/3 of the total cost• TDR specification
– Gradient at vertical test• Average 35MV/m• Accept cavities > 35 -20% = 28MV/m• Q0 > 0.8x1010 at 35MV/m• yield > 90% (Up to 2 surface treatment passes)
– Average operating gradient 31.5MV/m• Accept the range +/- 20%• Q0 > 1xx1010 at 31.5MV/m
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 6
Main Linac Parameters
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 7
MAIN Linac RF Parameters
Cavity (9- cell TESLA elliptical shape)Average accelerating gradient 31.5 MV/ mQ factor Q0 1.00E+10Effective length 1.038 mR/ Q 1036 W
Accepted operational gradient spread +/ - 20 %Cryomodule
Total slot length 12.652 mType A 9 cavitiesType B 8 cvities incl. 1 SC quadML unit A+B+ANumber of units (e+/ e- ) 282/ 285
Total component countsCryomodule type A 564/ 570Cryomodule type B 282/ 2859- cell cavities 7332/ 7410SC quad 282/ 285
Total linac length (flat site) 11027/ 11141 mTotal linac length (mountain site) 11072/ 11188 mEffective average accelerating grad 21.3 MV/ m
RF requirements (for average gradient)Beam current 5.8 mAbeam (peak) power per cavity 190 kWMatched loaded Q (QL) 5.40E+06Cavity fill time 924 msBeam pulse length 727 msTotal RF pulse length 1650 msRF- to- beam power efficiency 44 %
Progress in 1.3 GHz ILC Cavity Production
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 8
• Progress in EXFEL (800 cavity construction as of 2012/10): (courtesy by D. Reschke: the 2nd EP at DESY)
– RI: 4 reference cavities with Eacc > 28 MV/m, (~ 39 MV/m max.)– Zanon: 3 reference cavities with Eacc > 30 MV/m ( ~ 35 MV/m max.)
year # 9-cell cavitiesqualified
Capable Lab. Capable Industry2006 10 1
DESY2
ACCEL, ZANON
2011 41 4 DESY, JLAB, FNAL, KEK
4 RI, ZANON, AES, MHI,
2012 (45) 5 DESY, JLAB, FNAL, KEK,
Cornell
5 RI, ZANON, AES, MHI,
Hitachi
A. Yamamoto, May2013, ECFA13
9
Global Cavity Gradient Results - EU
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
DESY data, D. Reschke et al., SRF2009, TUPPO051.
3 slides from R.Geng, LCWS12
10
Global Cavity Gradient Results - Americas
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
JLAB data, R.L. Geng et al., IPAC2011, MOPC111.
11
Global Cavity Gradient Results - Asia
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
KEK data, Y. Yamamoto et al., IPAC2012, WEPPC013.
High Gradient Accelerating Cavity
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 12
Production yield: 94 % at > 28 MV/m,Achieved Average gradient: 37.1 MV/m
> 16000 cavities needed for 500GeV
13
System Viability Proof
DESY: FLASH• SRF-CM string + Beam,
– ACC7/PXFEL1 < 32 MV/m >• 9 mA beam, 2009• 800ms, 4.5mA beam, 2012
KEK: STF• S1-Global: complete, 2010
– Cavity string : < 26 MV/m> • Quantum Beam : 6.7 mA, 1 ms, • CM1 & beam, 2014 ~2015
FNAL: NML/ASTA• CM1 test complete• CM2 operation, in 2013• CM2 + Beam, 2013 ~ 2014
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
ILC Spec: 5.8mA, 1ms
A. Yamamoto, JPS meeting, Mar.2013
E.Kako, 2013/12/05, KEK
Euro-XFEL Status
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 14
As of 11.09.2013
Num. of cavities:vendor 1 23vendor 2 56
Europe - XFEL cavity production
2nd pass: additional high-pressure rinse
usable gradient: X-ray limited (dark current)Maximum gradient
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya D. Reschke, LCWS13 15
US – Fermilab CM-2
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
CM-2 features all high gradient cavities (> 35 MV/m)Cryomodule is installed and cold. Commissioning has started – no results yet
New 500 W 2K refrigerator operational
16
M.Harrison, LCWS13
17
US FY 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
CDR
Q_0 recipe
CM testing
CM Prod.
First X-rays
High Q_0 cryomodule with reduced cryogenics operating costs:
Improved cooling capabilityNew cavity surface processing recipeImproved magnetic shieldingAdiabatic cool-down process
Cryomodule Production– Fermilab & JLAB
M.Harrison, LCWS13 2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
US – LCLS II
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
CM01 CM2,3 CM04 CM15 CM16 CM35BC1
E = 250 MeVR56 = -55 mmsd = 1.4 %
BC2E = 1600 MeVR56 = -60 mmsd = 0.46 %
GUN0.75 MeV
LHE = 98 MeVR56 = -5 mmsd = 0.05 %
L0j= *
V0=97 MVIpk = 12 A
Lb = 2.0 mm
L1j =-22°
V0=220 MVIpk = 12 A
Lb =2.0 mm
HLj =-165°
V0 =55 MV
L2j = -21°
V0=1447 MVIpk = 50 A
Lb = 0.56 mm
L3j = 0
V0=2409 MVIpk = 1.0 kA
Lb = 0.024 mm
LTUE = 4.0 GeV
R56 = 0sd 0.016%
2-km
100-pC machine layout: Oct. 8, 2013; v21 ASTRA run; Bunch length Lb is FWHM
3.9GHz
Linac and compressor layout
4 GeV CW SRF Linac based FEL based on ILC cavities at SLAC• 35 cryomodules – 280 cavities• Gradient 16 MV/m; Q0 2e10 at 1.8K• Beam power 1.2 MW max• Cryogenic power 5.5 MW• Located in the upstream end of the existing 3km tunnel
550 m~ LCLS-II
Length
18
M.Harrison, LCWS13
10 year Evolution of STF at KEK
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 19E.Kako, 2013/12/05, KEKup to ~ 420MeV
Remaining Technical Issues for Main Linac
• Cavity production yield as high as possible• Improvement of cavity performance in
cryomodule• Finalize the coupler design (TTF3/XFEL or STF2
type)• Confirmation of the reliability in long term
operation (coupler, tuner)• Further cost reduction in mass production• Higher cavity gradient for Ecm>500GeV
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 20
Positron Source
• Undulator method (adopted in ILC baseline)
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 21
3 possible shemes of positron beam generation
• Conventional Method– Hit a few GeV electrons on a target, and collect the generated positrons– adopted in many accelerators, well established– Issues in the application to ILC
• Survivability of the target OK • Emittance of the generated positron OK (improved DR optics)• Transport to DR entrance under study• No polarized positron
• Laser-Compton method (far future)
ILC Design (undulator method)• Electron energy >150GeV
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 22
• Undulator– At the end of the electron linac– Helical, superconducting– Length ~150m (~230m when highly poloarized positron is needed)– K=0.92, l=1.15cm, (B=0.86T on the axis)– beam aperture 5.85mm (直径)
• Target: rotating titanium alloy• Flux Concentrator for positron capture• Normal-conducting accelkeration up to 400MeV• Polarization ~30% (~60% with photon collimator and longer undulator)
Positron Yield• Undulator aT the end
of electron l;inac• positron yield
depends on the electron energy (=center-of-mass energy / 2)
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 23
• Positron insufficient for Ee < 150GeV
• To restore the luminosity, the electron linac is operated at 10Hz: 5Hz for positron
production 5Hz for collision
Target• Wheel of Titanium alloy,
diameter 1m• Must rotate at 100m/s
(2000 rpm) in vacuum• Under test at LLNL using
Ferromagnet seal• Still unsatisfactory
– Outgassing spikes still being observed
• More works needed– market products don’t work
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 24
Positron Capture• Baseline : Capture by flux concentrator
– No change since RDR– But lower the max field 5T3.5T
(simulation showed sufficient)• Problem: pulse duration 1ms
– Also being tested at LLNL• Can be replaced with QWT (Quarter Wave Transformer)
– But requires longer undulaort (x1.6 倍 )– Heavier load on the target
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 25
20 triplets, rep. = 300 Hz • triplet = 3 mini-trains with gaps • 44 bunches/mini-train, Tb_to_b = 6.15 n sec
DRTb_to_b = 6.15 n sec
2640 bunches/train, rep. = 5 Hz • Tb_to_b = 369 n sec
e+ creation go to main linac
Time remaining for damping = 137 m sec
Booster Linac5 GeV NC300 Hz
Drive LinacSeveral GeV NC300 Hz
TargetAmorphous Tungsten
Pendulum or Slow Rotation 2640 bunches60 mini-trains
Conventional e+ Source for ILCNormal Conducting Drive and Booster Linacs in 300 Hz operation
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 26
T.Omori
Bunch Pattern
<-- the 100 ns gap is required to cure an e- cloud problem in e+ DR.
=132 bunches
T.Omori
Moving target still needed but much slower
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 27
Issues of the Positron System
• Undulator Scheme– Rotating target and flux concentrator development at LLNL– Photon collimator for higher polarization
• Conventional Source– “conventional” but still needs some more R&D– High current, high rep rate driver linac– Moving target (<~ 5m/s)– Flux concentrator– Overall simulation
• Confirm the positron yield• Including capture, bunch compression, beamloading & energy compression
• Choice of undulator/conventional will not affect the tunnel shape– The driver electron linac for Conventional Source can be installed in the
space for undulator+photon drift in the ubdulator scheme– Therefore, we have some couple of years to the deadline of the choice
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 28
Moving Target• <~5m/sec required (1/20 of undulator scheme)• 2 possible schemes being developed at KEK
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 29
bellows seal
vacuum
airferromagneticfluid seal
air vacuum
5Hz pendulum with bellows seal rotating target with ferromagnetic seal
main issue: life of bellows main issue: vacuum
First step prototype being tested
Damping Rings• Requirements
– gex = 5.5 mm, gey = 20nm– Time for damping 100ms– First step 1312 bunches, maximum 2625 bunches– bunch-by-bunch injection/extraction
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 30
quadrupole section
dipole section
• Circumference ~3km• 1 ring for each of electron and positron
in the first step bunch interval ~6ns
• (if necessary) add one more positron ring when going to 2625 bunches• depends on electron cloud• 1 electron ring in any case (bunch
interval 3ns)
Damping Ring Configuration
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 31
Damping Ring Requirements
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 32
Beam energy 5 GeVTrain repetition rate 5 nsMain linac bunch separation 554 nsNumber of bunches per train 1312Buncg population 2.00E+10Injection requirements
Normalized betatron amplitude (Ax+Ay)max 0.07 m.radEnergy range (full) 75 MeVBunch length (full) 66 mm
Extracted beamNormalized horizontal emittance 5500 nm.radNormalized vertical emittance 20 nm.radRms relative energy spread 0.11 %Rms bunch length 6 mmMaximum allowed transfer jitter 0.1 sx, sy
Damping Ring Parameters
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 33
Low powerHigh lumi positron electronCircumference kmNumber of bunches 1312 2625Bunch population 2.00E+10 2.00E+10Maximum bunch current mA 389 779Transverse damping time ms 12.86 17.5Longitudinal damping time ms 6.4 8.7Bunch length mm 6.02 6.01Momentum compaction factor 3.30E- 04 3.30E- 04Normalized horizontal emittance mm 6.4 5.6Horizontal chromaticity - 50.9 - 51.3Vertical chromaticity - 44.1 - 43.3Wiggler firld T 2.16 1.81Number of wigglersEnergy loss per turn MeV 8.4 6.19RF frequency MHzNumber of cavities 10 12Total voltage MV 14 22 17.9Voltage per cavity MV 1.4 1.17 1.83 1.49RF synchronous phase deg 18.5 21.9 20.3Power per RF coupler kW 176 294 272 200
38923.95
12650 6504.554
1.51- 43.3- 51.35.7
3.30E- 046.0212
54
2.00E+10
5Hz mode 10Hz mode
3.238 3.2381312
Electron Cloud Instability
• Has been studied at CESR-TA by international team• Gave recommendation for the mitigation method (table below)
– Arc and wiggler sections requires antichamber– Full power in 3.2km ring needs aggressive mitigation plan
• No significant difference between 6.4km with 2600 bunches and 3.2km with 1300 bunches
EC Working Group Baseline Mitigation RecommendationDrift* Dipole Wiggler Quadrupole*
Baseline Mitigation I TiN Coating Grooves with
TiN coating Clearing Electrodes TiN Coating
Baseline Mitigation II
Solenoid Windings Antechamber Antechamber
Alternate Mitigation NEG Coating TiN Coating Grooves with TiN
CoatingClearing Electrodes
or Grooves
ECLOUD`10 (October 13, 2010, Cornell University)342013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
Damping Ring Vacuum Chamber• Following the recommendation by CESR-TA team, ILC adopts the
following chambers• Other instabilities are less serious in positron damping ring• FII (Fast Ion Instability) is the most important in the electron ring
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 35
BDS(Beam Delivery System)
• Ultimate role of BDS is to focus the beam at the IP, but there lots of devices to do this
• Machine Protection System• Tune-up/emergency dump• Collimator• Beam diagnostics section (beam energy, emittance,
polarization)• Muon absorber• Crab cavity• Feedback system• Beam diagnostics after IP (beam energy, polarization)• Main beam dump
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 36
BDS Layout
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 37
BDS Main Parameters
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 38
BDS Parameters
Length per side 2254 mLength of main extraction line 300 mLength of tune- up extraction line 467 mMaximum beam emnery 250 GeVMaximum beam energy (with more magnets) 500 GeVDistance from IP to first quad (ILD/ SiD) 3.51/ 4.5 mCrossing angle at IP 14 mradNormalized emittance (horizontal) 10000 nmNormalized emittance (vertical) 35 nmNominal bunch length 300 mm
39120 m
50 mLINAC
DR
ATF2
The ATF2 has been designed, constructed and operated under the international collaboration.
ATF2: Beam Focusing Test Facility at KEK
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
ATF2 Goals
• Beam size at 1.3GeV– Goal 37nm– ~65nm
achieved • Beam
positron stabilization to a few nm by feedback
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 40
IP Feedback• Bunch interval is long enough for
intra-train digital feedback– Advantage of SC collider
• Large disruption parameter– Dy = 25
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 41
Issues on BDS• ATF2
– Beam focus by another factor 2– Stabilization to ~2nm
• Design check – beam dumpline– impedances
• Commissioning strategy– Is the IP beam size monitor needed?
• Access to IR hall– Access slope in TDR (mountain region) but, is vertical shaft
possible?
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 42
Access Tunnel Access Hall(Slope <10%)
Damping RingDetector HallRing To Main Linac (RTML)
e- Main Linac (ML)
e+ ML
RTML turn-around
e- Source
e+ Source (Slope <7%)Existing surface road
Existing road
(The background photo shows a similar site image, but not the real site.)
Surface Structures
PM-13PM-12
PM-10PM-8
PM-ab PM+8PM+10 PM+12 PM+13
(Center Campus)PX
Kitakami-site cross section
Site Specific Design
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya
43
CFS Plan Towards the Construction Start
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 44
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
A.Enomoto, LCWS13
9-year Construction Schedule
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 45
From the LCWS Conclusion on CFS
• The selected site satisfies the TDR conventional designs without any fundamental issues
• The remaining issues yet to be worked out (such as the path length and positron scheme) will not affect the underground construction and surface facility layout
• Intensive geotechnical study of the detector hall by a Japanese company. This will be checked with the previous European IR hall analysis
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 46
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya 47
LCC Pre-IL Accelerator Organization
Electrical SupportJapan
Mechanical SupportJapan
Cryogenic SupportJapan
SRFww
Conventional Facilitiesww
LC Project Office (KEK)
Controls & ComputingJapan
SafetyJapan
Accelerator Design & Integrationww
Electron Sourceww
Positron Sourceww
Damping Ringsww
RTML & bunch compressor
ww
Main Linacww
Beam Deliveryww
Machine-Detector Interface
ww
Domestic Programs &System Tests
Project Management Baseline, ScheduleCost, EDMS
Technical Board
LCWS13 Mike Harrison
48
Summary• Site down-selected to Kitakami, Japan• Site-specific design going to start• There are some remaining issues
– positron– Final focus (ATF2)
• New organization under LCC-ILC box (chaired by Mike Harrison) is being formed
2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya