Dolby Virtual Speaker / Dolby Headphone with Dolby Pro Logic IIx
IITx- IIx Ylldownloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijmms/1998/890980.pdf · H.K. PATHAK...
Transcript of IITx- IIx Ylldownloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijmms/1998/890980.pdf · H.K. PATHAK...
Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci.VOL. 21 NO. 3 (1998) 467-h70
467
AN APPLICATION OF FIXED POINT THEOREMSIN BEST APPROXIMATION THEORY
H.K. PATHAKDepartment of Mathematics
Kalyan MahavidyalayaBhilai Nagar (M.P.) 490 006, INDIA
Y.J. CliODepartment of Mathematics
Gyeongsang National UniversityChinju 660-701, KOREA
S.M. KANGDepartment of Mathematics
Gyeongsang National UniversityChinju 660-701, KOREA
(Received February 7, 1996 and in revised form June 18, 1996)
ABSTRACT. In this paper, we give an application of Jungck’s fixed point theorem to best ap-
proximation theory, which extends the results of Singh and Sahab et al.
KEY WORDS AND PHRASES: Contractive operator, best approximant, compatible map-
pings, fixed point.
1991 AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES: 54H25, 47H10.
Let X be a normed linear space. A mapping T X X is said to be contractwe on X (resp.,on a subset C of X) if IITx- Tyll <_ IIx Yll for all x, y in X (resp., C). The set of fixed points of
T on X is denoted by F(T). If is a point of X, then for 0 < a _< 1, we define the set Da of best
(C, a)-approximants to consists of the points y in C such that
Let D denote the set of best C-approximants to . For a 1, our definition reduces to the set D of
best C-approximants to . A subset C of X is said to be starshaped with, respect to a point q E C
if, for all x in C and all A 5 [0,1], Az + (1 A)q C. The point p is called the star-centre of C. Aconvex set is starshaped with respect to each of its points, but not conversely. For an example, the
set C {0} [0,1] LI [1, 0] {0} is starshaped with respect to (0, 0) e C as the star-centre of C, but
it is not convex.
In this paper, we give an application of Jungck’s fixed point theorem to best approximation
theory, which extends the results of Sahab et al. [9] and Singh [10].By relaxing the linearity of the operator T and the convexity of D in the original statement of
Brosowski [1], Singh [10] proved the following:
Theorem 1. Let C be a T-invariant subset of a normed linear space X. Let T C C be a
contractive operator on C and let F(T). If D c_ X is nonempty, compact and starshaped, then
D f F(T) 0.In the subsequent paper [11], Singh observed that only the nonexpansiveness of T on D’ DU{}
is necessary. Further, Hicks and Humphries [4] have shown that the assumption T" C C can be
weakened to the condition T" OC C if y C, i.e., y E D is not necessarily in the interior of C,where OC denotes the boundary of C.
Recently, Sahab, Khan and Sessa [9] generalized Theorem as in the following:
468 H. K. PATHAK, Y. J. CHO AND S. M. KANG
Theorem 2. Let X be a Banach space. Let T, I X X be operators and C be a subset of Xsuch that T" OC C and 5: F(T)f3 F(I). Further, suppose that T and I satisfy
(1)
for all x, y in D’, I is linear, continuous on D and ITx TIx for all x in D. If D is nonempty,
compact and starshaped with respect to a point q F(I) and I(D) D, then Df3F(T)f3F(I) .Recall that two self-maps I and T of a metric space (X, d) with d(x, y) IIx- Yll for all x, y X
are said to be compatible on X if
.h_m d(ITx., TIx.)(= .h_rn IlITz. Tlz.ll) 0
whenever there is a sequence {x. } in X such that Tx., Ix. t, as n oo, for some tin X ([6]-[8]).We shall use N to denote the set of positive integers and CI(S) to denote the closure of a set S.
For our main theorem, we need the following:
Proposition 3. [8] Let T and I be compatible self-maps of a metric space (X, d) with I beingcontinuous. Suppose that there exist real numbers r > 0 and a (0,1) such that for all x, y X,
d(Tx, Ty) <_ rd(Ix, Iy) + a max(d(Tx, Ix), d(Ty, Iy)}.
,Then Tw Iw for some w X if and only if A f3{Cl(T(Ko)) n N} # $, where for each
go {x X" d(Tx, Ix) <_ - }.On the other hand, using this proposition, Jungck [8] proved the following:Theorem 4. Let I and T be compatible self-maps of a closed convex subset C of a Banach spaceX. Suppose that I is continuous and linear with T(C) c_ I(C). If there exists an a e (0,1) such
that for all x, y C,
IITx T,II _< alllx lull + (1 a) max{llTx lxll, IITy- IulI}, (2)
then I and T have a unique common fixed point in C.By using this theorem, we extend Theorem 2 as in the following:
Theorem 5. Let X be a Banach space. Let T, I X X be operators and C be a subset of Xsuch that T" c9C C and 5: F(T)N F(1). Further, suppose that Tand I satisfy (2) for all x, yin D’ Do t3 {5:} U E, where E {q X Ix=,Tx. q, {xo} C Do}, 0 < a < 1, I is linear,continuous on Do and T, I are compatible in D. If D is nonempty, cbmpact and convex, and
I(D) Do, then D f F(T) f F(I) .Proof. Let y D and hence Iy is in D since I(D) D. lurther, if y OC, then Ty is in Csince T(OC) c C. From (2), it follows that
[ITy- 5:[] ][Ty-
< allly I5:11 + (1 a) max{llTy I11, IITS:
which implies a]]Ty 5:1] <IIIy- 11 and so T is in D. Thus T maps Do into itself.
By hypothesis, we have 5: TS: I5:. Then Proposition 3 implies that
A {CI(T(K.))’n N} # 0.
Suppose that w 6 A. Then for each n N, there exists y. T(Ko) such that d(w, I/o) < 1/n.Consequently, for such n, we can and do choose x. K. such that d(w, Tx.) < 1In and so Tx. w.
But since x. 6 K., d(Tx., Ix.) < 1/n and therefore Ixo w. Thus we have
lira Iz, lira Tx, w. (3)
FIXED POINT THEOREMS 69
Therefore, for a sequence {z} in D= the existence of (3) is guaranteed whenever D= C K,. Moreover,w 6 E. Since I and T are compatible and I is continuous, we have lirn_am TIz,, Iw and
lim._am I:x,., Iw. By (2), we have
IITIx. Y:ll []TIx. Vl] < al]Ix. I]1 + (1 a)max{I]Tlx.
which implies, as n
IIIw ll -< alllw- ll.Hence Iw . By (2) again, we have
wgi IIT- 11-< (- )IIT- 11, and T .Next, we consider
IlTw T.II < allIw Ix-II + (1 -a)max{llVw -/toll, IITx.which gives II wll < all wll as n oo, and so w, i.e., w Iw Tw. By Theorem 4, w
must be unique. Hence E (w}. Then D; D U (w} D’Let {k. } be a monotonically non-decreasing sequence of real numbers such that 0 _< k. < 1 and
li".am k. 1. Let {x,} be a sequence in D’ satisfying (3). For each n e N, define a mapping
T,’D’,, D’,, byT,,x, k.Tx, + (1- k.)p. (4)
It is possible to define such a mapping T, for each n N since D’ is starshaped with respect to
p6F(I).Since I is linear, we have
T.Ix, k.TIx, + (1 k.)p, IT,x, k.ITx, + (1 k,.,)p.
By compatibility of I and T, we have for each n q N,
0 <_ lim liT.Ix, IT.x,< k. lira IIrlz, ITxjI + lira (1 -/)llp-
=0
and so
lira lIT.Iz, IT.z, o
whenever lim,._.am Ixj lim3_am T.x w since we have
lira T,.,x, k, lira Tx, + (1 k,.,)w
Thus, I and T, are compatible on D’ for each n and T,,(D’) C D’,, I(D).On the other hand, by (2), for all x, y 6 D’, we have, for all j > n and n fixed,
liT: T.II<_ alllz- I11 + (1 -a)max{llT- I11, IIT- I11}
<_
(X k.)llT- Pll / IIT.- I11}-
470 H.K. PATHAK, Y. J. CHO AND S. M. KANG
Hence for all j
_n, we have
liT,a:- T.Yll < alllx- Iyll ++ IIT,z lall, (1 k,)llTy Pll + IIT.,y IylI}
Thus, since lim3_00 k 1, from (5), for every n E N, we have
<3--*00
+which implies
()
liT,a: T.,yll- allIx -/Yll / (- a) max{llT.,x Xxll, IIT. I11}
for all x, y E D. Therefore, by Theorem 4, for every n N, T, and I have a unique common fixed
point x, in D’, i.e., for every n N, we have
F(T,) N F(I) {x, }.
Now, the compactness of D= ensures that {x} has a convergent subsequence {x,,, } which converges
to a point z in D=. Since
x,,, T,,x, k,,Tx,,, + (1 k,,)q (6)
and T is continuous, we have, as x in (6), z Tz, i.e., z D= f3 F(T).Further, the continuity of I implies that
Iz I(,li_m z,.,,)= ,lim Ix,.,, ,li.m_ z,.,, z,
i.e., z F(I). Therefore, we have z D a F(T) N F(I) and so
D F(T) F(I) # .This completes the proof.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. The first author was supported in part by U.G.C., New Delhi, India,
and the second and third authors were supported in part by the Basic Research Institute Program,Ministry of Education, Korea, 1996, Project No. BSRI-96-1405.
REFERENCES
1. B. Brosowski, Fixpunktsatze in der Approximation-theorie, Mathematica (Cluj) 11 (1969), 195-220.
2. B. Fisher and S. Sessa, On a fixed point theorem o.f GreguJ, Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. 9(1986), 23-28.
3. M. Gregu, A fixed point theorem in Banach spaces, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. (5)17-A (1980), 193-198.
4. T. L. Hicks and M. D. Humphries, A note on fixed point theorems, J. Approx. Theroy 34 (1982),221-225.
5. G. Jungck, An ifffixed point criterion, Math. Mag. 49(1) (1976), 32-34.6. G. Jungck, Compatible mappings and common fixed points, Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. 9
(1986), 771-779.7. G. Jtmgck, Common fix points .or commuting and compatible maps on compacta, Proc. Amer.
Math. So. 103 (1988), 977-983.8. G. Jungck, On a fixed point theorem of Fisher and Sessa, Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. 13
(1990), 497-500.9. S. A. Sahab, M. S. Khan and S. Sessa, A result in best approximation theory, J. Approx. TheoryS (19),
10. S. P. Singh, An application of a fixed point theorem to approximation theory, J. Approx. Theory25 (1979), 89-90.
11. S. P. Singh, Application of fixed point theorems in approximation theory, "Applied NonlinearAnalysis" (Edited by V. Lakshmikantham), Academic Press, New York, 1979.
Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com
Differential EquationsInternational Journal of
Volume 2014
Applied MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in
Complex AnalysisJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
OptimizationJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Operations ResearchAdvances in
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Function Spaces
Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Algebra
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Decision SciencesAdvances in
Discrete MathematicsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of