IFS PACsecure En
Transcript of IFS PACsecure En
IFS PACsecureStandard for auditing quality andsafety of packaging materials
Version 1October 2012© IFS, October 2012
IFS publishes information, opinions and bulletins to its best knowledge, but cannot takeany responsibility for any mistakes, omissions or possibly misleading information in itspublications, especially in this document.
The Standard owner of the present document is:
IFS Management GmbHAmWeidendamm 1A10117 BerlinGermany
Managing Director: Stephan TrompAG Charlottenburg HRB 136333 BVAT-N°: DE278799213
Bank: Berliner SparkasseBank code number: 10050000Account number: 190029765IBAN number: DE96100500000190029765BIC-/Swift-Code: BE LA DE BE
All rights reserved. All publications are protected under international copyright laws.With-out the expressed written consent of the IFS Standard owner any kind of unauthorised useis prohibited and subject to legal action.This also applies to the reproduction with a photo-copier, the inclusion into an electronic database/software, or the reproduction on CD-Rom.
No translation may be made without official permission by the IFS Standard owner.
The IFS PACsecure is available online via:www.ifs-certification.com
Or by Mail, Fax and E-mail:IFS Management GmbHAmWeidendamm 1A10117 BerlinGermany
Phone: +49-(0)30-726250-74Fax: +49-(0)30-726250-79E-mail: [email protected]
GERMANY | BERLINIFS Management GmbHAmWeidendamm 1AD-10117 BerlinPhone: +49(0)3072625074Fax: +49(0)3072625079E-mail: [email protected]
FRANCE | PARISIFS Office ParisFCD12, rue EulerF-75008 ParisPhone: +33(0)144439916Fax: +33(0)147205353E-mail: [email protected]
ITALY | MILANIFS Office MilanFederdistribuzioneVia Albricci 8I-20122 MilanoPhone: +39(0)289075150Fax: +39(0)26551169E-mail: [email protected]
POLAND |WARSAWIFS Office Central & Eastern Europeul. Serwituty 25PL-02-233WarsawPhone: +48601957701E-mail: [email protected]
BRAZIL | DOURADOSRepesentante IFS BrasilCaroline NowakBR-79824 Dourados, MSPhone: +55(67)81514560E-mail: [email protected]
CHINA | HEFEIStarFarmRoom 2301, C building,Fortune Plaza No. 278 Suixi Road, 230041,Hefei, Anhui, ChinaPhone: +86(0)5515666069Fax: +86(0)5515681376E-mail: [email protected]
USA | ST. LOUISIFS Americas1610 Des Peres Road, Suite 150St. Louis, MO 63131USAPhone: +13146864610Fax: +13146864602E-mail: [email protected]
CONTACT DETAILS OF THE IFS OFFICES
CONTACT DETAILS OF THE PACKAGINGASSOCIATION OF CANADA (PAC)
THE PACKAGINGASSOCIATION | CANADA1 Concorde Gate, Suite 607Toronto ONM3C 3N6CanadaPhone: +14164907860E-mail: [email protected]
IFS PACsecure
Standard for auditing quality andsafety of packaging materials
Version 1October 2012
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
IFS is pleased to acknowledge the essential support provided by the followingexperts:
James D Downham President & CEO of PAC,The Packaging Association of CanadaLarry Dworkin PAC, The Packaging Association of CanadaLarry Shortt L&G Shortt Solutions Limited, CanadaThomas Maiwald real,- SB-Warenhaus GmbH, GermanyDr. Andrea Niemann-Haberhausen Det NorskeVeritas, Germany
IFS likes to thank all all companies who contributed in the developmentof the PACsecure Standard, which is the basis for the IFS PACsecure Standard:
Acorn PackagingAgriculture and Agrifood CanadaAgropur Division NatrelAlcan PackagingAlte-RegoAtlantic PackagingBall Packaging ProductsBericapBothwell CheeseBrewers Association of CanadaBright Cheese House,TheCadbury Adams CanadaCanadian Corrugated Case AssociationCanadian Council of Grocery DistributorsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyCanadian General Standards BoardCanadian Plastics Industry AssociationCanAmera FoodsCanbra Foods LimitedCentral GraphicsChantler PackagingCiom/NovacoteCoca-ColaCousins CurrieCrown PackagingDainty FoodsDare Foods Ellis PackagingFoodCon
GayLea FoodsGeneral Mills CanadaGraham PackagingGraphic PackagingGuelph FoodTechnology CentreHealth CanadaHigh Liner FoodsIan Britt and AssociatesJM SmuckerJones PackagingKraft CanadaKraft Foods GlobalLabeladLangen PackagingLoblaw BrandsMaple Leaf Consumer FoodsMaple Lodge FarmsMcCain FoodsMultiPakMinute Maid Company Canada,TheNestle CanadaNorampacOwens-Illinois Glass ContainersOld Dutch FoodsOntario Ministry of Agriculture andFoodPackaging Association of CanadaPackall
Parmalat CanadaPeel Plastics ProductsPlasticapPolytainersPrimex Packaging ServicesR.A. Miller & Co.Reinhart FoodsRichards PackagingRobinhood MultifoodsRopakSandler ConsultingSaputo Bakery DivisionSaxco CanadaScott Paper LimitedSilgan PlasticsSmucker Foods of CanadaSmurfit MBISobeysSonocoSpecialty PaperTetra Pak CanadaThe Packaging GroupTWDTechnologiesW.G. Pro ManufacturingWC ParchmentWG CorporateWinPakTechnologies
© IFS, October 2012
4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
IFS is grateful to the members of the IFS International Technical Com-mittee and the associated national working groups in France, Germany,Italy and United States. The IFS PACsecure Standard is the result of theinternational partnership between IFS and the Packaging Association ofCanada.
Members of the IFS International Technical Committee
Andrea Artoni CONAD, on behalf of ANCD (Associazone Nazionale Coopera-tive tra Dettaglianti), Italy
Sabrina Bianchini Det NorskeVeritas, ItalyYvan Chamielec EMC Distribution – Groupe Casino, FranceFayçal Bellatif Eurofins certification, FranceRoberta Denatale/Eleonora Pistochini Auchan, on behalf of Federdistribuzione, ItalyGerald Erbach METRO AG, GermanyJean-François Feillet Meralliance, FranceCécile Gillard-Kaplan Groupe Carrefour, FranceAlmudena Hernandez AENOR, SpainLuc Horemans Scamark – Groupement Leclerc, FranceDr. Horst Lang Globus SB-Warenhaus Holding GmbH & Co. KG, GermanyJoachim Mehnert DQS, GermanyPatricia Menendez/Maria López deMontenegro Dia Group, SpainDr. Angela Moritz REWE Group; REWE-Zentral-AG, GermanyAlberto Peiró Mercadona, SpainBizhan Pourkomailian Mc Donalds Europe, United KingdomHorst Roeser COOP, SwitzerlandNuria Sanz Levia El Corte Ingles, SpainSergio Stagni COOP, on behalf of ANCC (Associazone Nazionale Cooperative
Consumatori), ItalyStephen Thome Dawn Food Products, USADr. Bert Urlings Vion Food, The NetherlandsKarin Voß EDEKA Zentrale AG & Co. KG, GermanyRomanWißner HARIBO GmbH & Co. KG, GermanyStefano Zardetto Voltan, Italy
IFS Team
George Gansner Marketing/Business Development DirectorDr. Helga Hippe Quality Assurance Management DirectorSeon Kim Shop ManagerChristin Kluge Quality Assurance Project ManagerNina Lehmann Project Manager Academy/Marketing/CommunicationsStéphanie Lemaitre Technical DirectorLucie Leroy Project ManagerClemens Mahnecke Technical Project ManagerMarek Marzec Business Consultant Central/Eastern EuropeCaroline Nowak Representative, South AmericaKsenia Otto Office ManagerSabine Podewski Project Manager Auditor Approval/ExaminationMaria Thalmann Project ManagerSerenaVenturi Project ManagerStephan Tromp Managing Director
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 5
Table of contents
Part 1: Audit Protocol
1 The history of International Featured Standards andIFS PACsecure Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.1 Purpose and contents of the audit protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2 Extraordinary information to the certification bodyby the certified company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3 General requirements for the quality and product safetymanagement system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3 Types of audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.1 Initial audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.2 Follow-up audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.3 Renewal audit (for recertification) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.4 Extension audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4 Scope of the audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5 The certification process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.1 Preparation of an audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2 Certification body selection – contractual arrangements . . 18
5.3 Duration of an audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.4 Drawing up an audit time schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.5 Evaluation of requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.5.1 Scoring a requirement as a deviation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.5.2 Scoring a requirement as a non-conformity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225.5.2.1 Major . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225.5.2.2 KO (Knock out) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235.5.3 Scoring a requirement with N/A (not applicable) . . . . . . . . . 24
5.6 Determination of the audit frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.7 Audit report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245.7.1 Structure of the audit report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245.7.2 The different steps for the audit report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255.7.2.1 Drawing up the pre-report of the audit and the outline
of the action plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255.7.2.2 Company’s completion of the corrective action plan . . . . . . 265.7.2.3 Auditor validation of the action plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275.7.3 Further rules about the audit report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
© IFS, October 2012
6 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
5.7.3.1 Link between two consecutive audit reports (initial andrenewal audits) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.8 Scoring and conditions for issuing audit reportand certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.8.1 Specific management of the audit process in case oneor several KO’s has/have been scored with D duringthe audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.8.2 Specific management of the audit process in case one orseveral Major non-conformity(ies) has/have been issued . 29
5.8.3 Specific management of the audit process in casethe final score is <75% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.8.4 Specific management of the audit process in caseof multi-site companies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6 Awarding the certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6.1 Deadlines for awarding certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.2 Certification cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
6.3 Information about conditions of withdrawal of certificate . 33
7 Distribution and storage of the audit report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
8 Supplementary action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
9 Appeal and complaints procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
10 Ownership and usage of the IFS PACsecure logo . . . . . . . . . 35
11 Review of the Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
12 IFS Integrity Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
12.1 Preventive quality assurance actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
12.2 Quality assurance actions after complaint notification . . . . 38
12.3 Sanctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
ANNEX 1Clarification for the scope application of the differentIFS Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
ANNEX 2Certification process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
ANNEX 3Product scopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
ANNEX 4Flow chart for management of KO scored with D and Majornon-conformities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 7
Part 2: List of audit requirements
1 Senior Management Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
1.1 Corporate policy/Corporate principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
1.2 Corporate structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
1.3 Customer focus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
1.4 Management review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2 Quality and Packaging Material Safety Management System 52
2.1 Quality management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522.1.1 Documentation requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522.1.2 Record keeping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2.2 Packaging Material Safety Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552.2.1 Hazard analysis and risk assessment system . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552.2.2 Hazard analysis and/or risk assessment team . . . . . . . . . . . . 562.2.3 Hazard analysis and risk assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3 Resource Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
3.1 Human resources management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
3.2 Human resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613.2.1 Personnel hygiene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613.2.2 Working conditions and protective clothing for personnel,
contractors and visitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 623.2.3 Procedures applicable to infectious diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
3.3 Training and instruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
3.4 Sanitary facilities, equipment for personnel hygiene andstaff facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
4 Planning and Production Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.1 Contract agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
4.2 Specifications and formulas/configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 684.2.1 Specifications and other legally required documentation . 684.2.2 Formula/configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.3 Product development/Product modification/Modificationof production processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
4.4 Purchasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 714.4.1 General purchasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 714.4.2 Trade of packaging materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
4.5 Product wrapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.6 Factory location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.7 Factory Exterior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.8 Plant layout and process flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
4.9 Constructional requirements for production and storageareas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
4.9.1 Constructional requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 774.9.2 Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
© IFS, October 2012
8 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
4.9.3 Floors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 774.9.4 Ceilings/Overheads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 784.9.5 Windows and other openings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 784.9.6 Doors and gates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 794.9.7 Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 794.9.8 Air conditioning/Ventilation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804.9.9 Water supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804.9.10 Compressed air . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
4.10 Cleaning and disinfection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
4.11 Waste disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
4.12 Risk of foreign material, metal, broken glass and wood . . . 85
4.13 Pest monitoring/Pest control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
4.14 Receipt of goods and storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
4.15 Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
4.16 Maintenance and repair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
4.17 Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
4.18 Traceability (including GMOs and allergens) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
4.19 Allergens and specific conditions of production . . . . . . . . . . 96
5 Measurements, Analysis, Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
5.1 Internal audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
5.2 Site factory inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
5.3 Process validation and control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
5.4 Calibration, adjustment and checking of measuringand monitoring devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
5.5 Control of quantity/filling quantity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
5.6 Product analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
5.7 Product quarantine (blocking/hold) and product release . . 103
5.8 Management of complaints from authorities and customers 103
5.9 Management of incidents, product withdrawal, productrecall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
5.10 Management of non-conformities and non conformingproducts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
5.11 Corrective actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
6 Packaging material defense/Food defense and externalinspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.1 Defense assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.2 Site Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
6.3 Personnel &Visitor Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
6.4 External Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
ANNEX 1GLOSSARY/DEFINITIONS LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 9
Part 3: Requirements for Accreditation Bodies,Certification Bodies and AuditorsIFS accreditation and certification process
0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
1 Requirements for the Accreditation Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
1.1 General requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
1.2 The training of the accreditation committee(or competent person) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
1.3 Competences of the assessor of the accreditation body . . 120
1.4 Frequency of the assessments of certification bodies . . . . . 120
1.5 Accreditation of an internationally-active certification body 121
1.6 Conditions for recovering accreditation after withdrawalor suspension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
1.7 Transfer of certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
2 Requirements for the Certification Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
2.1 ISO/IEC 17065 IFS accreditation process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
2.2 Signing of contract with the proprietor of IFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
2.3 Certification decision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
2.4 Certification bodies’ responsibilities for IFS PACsecuretrainers and the IFS PACsecure auditors (includingfreelancers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
2.5 Specific requirements for IFS PACsecure trainers . . . . . . . . . 125
3 Requirements for IFS PACsecure auditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
3.1 Conversion of auditors to get the IFS PACsecure version 1auditor approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
3.2 Requirements for new IFS PACsecure auditors . . . . . . . . . . . 1263.2.1 Requirements before applying for the IFS PACsecure
examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1263.2.2 General requirements for auditors when applying for
IFS PACsecure examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
3.3 IFS examination process (for new auditors, as specifiedin chapter 3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
3.4 Maintenance of auditors’ qualification (for both types ofauditors, as specified in chapters 3.1 and 3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
3.5 Scope extension for IFS-approved auditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
3.6 Audit team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1303.6.1 General rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1303.6.2 Specific rules for audit team and auditing 3 consecutive
times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
ANNEX 1Product scopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
© IFS, October 2012
10 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
Part 4: Reporting and IFS Audit Portal
0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
1 Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
1.1 Audit overview (Annex 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
1.2 Audit report (Annex 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
1.3 Action plan (Annex 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
1.4 Minimum requirements for IFS PACsecure certificate(Annex 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
2 The IFS Audit Portal and the IFS Database(www.ifs-certification.com) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
ANNEX 1Final Audit Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
ANNEX 2Detailed Audit Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
ANNEX 3Action plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
ANNEX 4Certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 11
Part 1: Audit Protocol
1 The history of International FeaturedStandards and IFS PACsecure Standard
Supplier audits have been a permanent feature of retailer’s systems andprocedures for many years. Until 2003 they were performed by thequality assurance departments of the individual retailers, wholesalersand food services. The ever-rising demands of consumers, the increas-ing liabilities of retailers, wholesalers and food services, the increasingof legal requirements and the globalisation of product supply, all madeit essential to develop a uniform quality assurance and food safetyStandard. Also, a solution had to be found to reduce the time associ-ated with a multitude of audits for involved stakeholders.
The associated members of the German retail federation – Handelsver-band Deutschland (HDE) – and of its French counterpart – Fédérationdes Entreprises du Commerce et de la Distribution (FCD) – drew up aquality and food safety standard for retailer branded food productsnamed the IFS Food, the first Standard of the IFS family, which isintended to allow the assessment of suppliers’ food safety and qualitysystems in accordance with a uniform approach. This Standard is nowmanaged by IFS Management GmbH, a company owned by FCD andHDE, and applies to all the post-farm gate stages of food processing.IFS Food Standard has been benchmarked with GFSI Guidance Docu-ment and is recognised by GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative).
The first version implemented (version 3) of the IFS Standard wasdeveloped by the HDE and launched in 2003. In January 2004, anupdated version, version 4, was designed and introduced in collabora-tion with the FCD. Within 2005/2006, the Italian retail associations alsojoined the International Food Standard and the development of version5 was a collaboration of retail federations from France, Germany andItaly as well as retailers from Switzerland and Austria.
For IFS Food version 6, the International Technical Committee and theFrench, German and Italian working groups have been actively involved,in addition to retailers, stakeholders and representatives of industry,food services and certification bodies. During the development of IFSFood version 6, IFS gained input from a recently formed IFS NorthAmerican working group and retailers from Spain, Asia and SouthAmerica.
Based on this experience, the IFS PACsecure Standard is a new one inthe IFS (International Featured Standards) family covering another partof the supply chain.
© IFS, October 2012
12 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
The fundamental objectives of IFS PACsecure, as well as for other IFSStandards, are:
– to establish a common standard with a uniform evaluation sys-tem,
– to work with accredited certification bodies and qualified IFSapproved auditors,
– to ensure comparability and transparency throughout the entiresupply chain,
– to reduce costs and time for both suppliers and retailers,
– to meet GFSI requirements.
As announced on February 15th 2012, IFS Management GmbH, owner ofthe GFSI benchmarked IFS Food Standard, IFS Logistics and other sup-ply chain Standards, together with The Packaging Association of Can-ada (PAC), have joined to bring the world’s foremost packaging stand-ard for primary and secondary packaging to the industry.
PACsecure was created by PAC to provide packaging manufacturersand converters the ability to certify primary and secondary packagingmaterials for the food industry. However, the IFS PACsecure Standard isapplicable to all kinds of packaging materials. Developed by a technicalworking group made up of some of North America’s largest globalpackaging and food manufacturers, the Standard is now managed by ajoint effort of the PAC through their technical expertise and know-howin the packaging industry and IFS and its global network of food safetyand quality standards infrastructure.
2 Introduction
2.1 Purpose and contents of the audit protocol
This audit protocol describes the specific requirements made on theorganisations involved in IFS PACsecure audits.
The purpose of the protocol is to define the criteria to be followed by acertification body performing audits against the IFS requirements, andin accordance with the accreditation norm ISO/IEC 17065.
It also details the procedures to be observed by the companies beingaudited, and clarifies the rationale of auditing them. Only accreditedcertification bodies to ISO/IEC 17065 for the scope of IFS PACsecure,and which have signed an agreement with the scheme owner can per-form audits against the IFS PACsecure Standard and can issue IFS PAC-secure certificates. The IFS requirements for certification bodies areclearly described in Part 3 of this document.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 13
2.2 Extraordinary information to the certification bodyby the certified company
In accordance with ISO/IEC Guide 65, the company shall inform its cer-tification body about any change or information indicating that theproducts may no longer comply with the requirements of the certifica-tion system (e.g. recall, alert on products, etc.). For IFS, this informationshall be made within 3 working days.
2.3 General requirements for the quality and productsafety management system
In general, when auditing in accordance with IFS, the auditor assessesif the various elements of a company’s quality and product safety man-agement system are documented, implemented, maintained, and con-tinuously improved. The auditor shall examine the following elements:
– organisational structure in relation to responsibility, authority,qualification and job description,
– documented procedures and the instructions concerning theirimplementation,
– inspection and testing: specified requirements and definedacceptance/tolerance criteria,
– actions to be taken in case of non-conformities,
– investigation of the causes of non-conformities and the imple-mentation of corrective actions,
– conformity analysis of safety and quality data and review ofimplementation in practice,
– handling, storage and retrieval of quality and packaging mate-rial safety records, such as traceability data, document control.
All processes and procedures shall be clear, concise and unambiguousand the personnel responsible shall understand the principles of thequality and product safety management system.
The quality and product safety management system is based on thefollowing methodology:
– to identify the processes needed for the quality and productsafety management system,
– to determine the sequence and interaction of these processes,
– to determine the criteria and methods required to ensure theeffective operation and control of these processes,
– to ensure the availability of information necessary to supportthe operation and monitoring of these processes,
© IFS, October 2012
14 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
– to measure, monitor and analyse these processes, and imple-ment the necessary action to achieve planned results and con-tinuous improvement.
3 Types of audit
3.1 Initial audit
An initial audit is a company’s first audit to IFS PACsecure. It is per-formed at a time and date agreed between the company and the selectedcertification body. During this audit the entire company is assessed,both in relation to its documentation and the processes themselves.During the audit, all criteria of the IFS requirements shall be assessedby the auditor. In the case of a pre-audit, the auditor who performs thisaudit shall be different from the auditor who performs the initial audit.
3.2 Follow-up audit
A follow-up audit is required in a specific situation when the results ofthe audit (an initial audit or a renewal audit) have been insufficient toallow the award of the certificate (see chart N° 6). During the follow-upaudit, the auditor focuses on the implementation of the actions taken tocorrect the Major non-conformity determined during the previous audit.The follow-up audit shall be performed within a six months period fromthe date of the previous audit. In general, the auditor who performedthe audit where a Major non-conformity has been identified shall per-form the follow up audit.
If the Major non-conformity is related to production failure(s), the fol-low up audit shall be performed at least 6 weeks after the previous auditand no later than 6 months after the previous audit. For other kinds offailures (e.g. documentation), the certification body is responsible forthe determination of the date of the follow-up audit.
If there is no follow-up audit performed after 6 months from the date ofthe previous audit, then a complete new audit is necessary.
In the event that the follow-up audit establishes that requirementsremain inadequate, a complete new audit is necessary. The eliminationof Major non-conformities shall always be established by an on-sitevisit by the auditor.
3.3 Renewal audit (for recertification)
Renewal audits are those which are performed after the initial audit.The period in which a renewal audit shall be performed is shown on thecertificate. A renewal audit involves a full and thorough audit of a com-
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 15
pany resulting in the issue of a new certificate. During the audit, all cri-teria of the IFS requirements shall be assessed by the auditor. Particularattention is paid to the deviations and non-conformities identified dur-ing the previous audit, as well as to the effectiveness and implementa-tion of corrective actions and preventive measures laid down in thecompany’s corrective action plan.
Note: corrective action plans from the previous audit shall always beassessed by the auditor, even if the previous audit has been performedmore than one year ago. Therefore, audited companies shall alwaysinform their certification body if they have already been IFS certified inthe past.
The date of the renewal audit shall be calculated from the date of theinitial audit and not from the date of issue of the certificate. Further-more, the renewal audit can be scheduled at earliest 8 weeks before andat latest 2 weeks after the renewal audit due date (see also section 6.2).Companies are responsible for maintaining their certification. The certi-fication bodies shall contact companies in advance in order to set a datefor a new audit.
In general, the expected date of each audit shall be uploaded in the IFSAudit Portal, in the diary function and at latest 2 weeks (14 calendardays) before the audit due date (it is possible to change the date shortterm).
3.4 Extension audit
In specific situations, such as new products and/or processes to beincluded in the audit scope or each time the audit scope would need tobe updated on the certificate, then, for an IFS PACsecure certified com-pany, it is not necessary to perform a complete new audit, but to organ-ise an on-site extension audit during the validity period of the existingcertificate. The certification body is responsible for determining relevantrequirements to be audited and relevant audit duration. The extensionaudit shall be performed by the auditor who performed the “normal”audit. The report of this extension audit shall be represented as anannex adjoined with the current audit report. Conditions for passing theextension audit (relative score ≥75%) are the same as normal one, butonly focused on specific requirements which have been audited; theoriginal audit score does not change.
If the extension audit demonstrates compliance, the certificate shall beupdated with the new scope and uploaded in the Audit Portal.
The updated certificate shall keep the same due date of end of validityas the current certificate.
If, during the extension audit, a Major non-conformity or a KO (KnockOut non-conformity) has been identified, the full audit is failed and thecurrent certificate shall be suspended as described in 5.8.1 and 5.8.2.
© IFS, October 2012
16 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
4 Scope of the audit
IFS PACsecure is a Standard for auditing primary and secondary pack-aging material manufacturers and converters.
Although initially developed for food contact packaging material manu-facturers (e.g. plastic foils for vegetables, cans for beverages, paperwrapping for flour, etc.) IFS PACsecure is also applicable to non-foodcontact packaging materials, such as:
– packaging materials for products intended to be used on theskin (e.g. cosmetic products),
– packaging materials for products not intended to be used onthe skin (e.g. household products, consumer goods, hardware,etc.).
The Standard can only be used when packaging material is “processed”,converted or printed and applies both to B to B and B to C businesses.As a result, IFS PACsecure shall not apply to the following activities:
– importation (offices, e.g. typical broker companies)
– transport, storage and distribution.
For clarification of the scope determination between IFS PACsecure andother IFS Standards (Food, Broker, Logistics, Cash & Carry/Wholesaleand HPC) please see Annex 1.
If the company trades packaging materials as finished products and if itwants to include them in the audit scope, the suppliers of these prod-ucts shall themselves be IFS PACsecure certified (if the trade productsare under the same product scope) or certified under a comparablescheme (if the trade products are under a different product scope) andthe specific requirements in the audit check-list (Part 2) related to tradeof packaging materials (4.4.2.1 to 4.4.2.3) shall be fulfiled. If this is notthe case, those products shall be excluded from the certificate and thecertificate shall mention: “trade activity is not included”.
If the above mentioned requirements are fulfiled, those traded packag-ing materials shall clearly be specified on the certificate, detailing theproduct scope(s), and specified in the report, both in the audit scopeand in the company profile.
The scope of the audit shall be defined and agreed between the com-pany and the certification body before the audit takes place. The scopeshall be clearly and unambiguously stated in the contract between thecompany and the certification body, in the audit report and on the cer-tificate.
The audit shall be performed at a time to ensure the full scope of prod-ucts and processes, as mentioned in the report and on the certificate,can be effectively assessed.
If, between two certification audits, new processes or products different
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 17
from those included in the scope of the current IFS PACsecure audit areimplemented, the certified company shall immediately inform its certi-fication body, who shall perform a risk assessment to decide whetheran extension audit should be performed or not (see also 3.4). The resultsof this risk assessment, based on hygiene and safety risks, shall bedocumented.
The audit shall be specific to the site where all the processing of theproducts is undertaken. Where decentralised structures exist and theaudit of a certain location is insufficient for gaining a complete view ofthe company’s processes, then all other relevant facilities shall also beincluded in the audit. Full details shall be documented within the com-pany profile in the audit report.
The audit scope shall include the complete activity of the company (i.e.the same kind of production on several lines for products under indus-try brands and retailer/wholesaler brands). The scope shall be reviewedand agreed at the beginning of the audit after an initial risk assessment.Furthermore, the scope can be modified after the risk assessment (forinstance, if a further activity interferes with the one concerned by theaudit scope).
The audit scope shall make reference to the audited product scope(s)corresponding to the type of packaging materials being processed/con-verted during the audit (see Annex 3).
If, under exceptional circumstances, the company decides to excludespecific product ranges (product lines) from the scope of the audit, thenthis shall be clearly noted and included in the audit report and on theIFS PACsecure certificate.
Auditing of multi-location companies with central managementIf defined processes are centrally organised in a company with severalproduction sites (e.g. purchasing, personnel management, complaintmanagement), the central managing site – headquarter – shall also beaudited and relevant audited requirements outcome shall be consid-ered in the audit reports of each production site.
Note: Each production site shall be audited separately in a period ofmaximum 12 months after the central managing site and shall have itsown audit report and certificate. Each site shall be mentioned in therelevant contract. If the central managing site does not have any pro-duction activity, this site cannot be IFS certified as an independent com-pany. The time for auditing the central managing site shall be describedin the company profile of the report.
The audit of the managing site shall always take place before the auditof each production site in order to have a preliminary overview.
Note: If it is not possible to perform an audit at the managing site, thenit shall be ensured that, during the audit of the production site, all nec-essary information from the managing site is available (e.g. a repre-sentative of the managing site should attend at the audit(s) of the pro-duction site(s)).
© IFS, October 2012
18 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
5 The certification process
5.1 Preparation of an audit
Before being audited, the company shall review all requirements of theIFS PACsecure Standard in detail. On the day of the audit, the currentversion of the Standard shall be available at the site being audited. Thecompany is responsible for acquiring the current version of the Stand-ard. In order to prepare for an initial audit, a company may carry out apre-audit, which is only intended to be used in-house. The pre-auditcannot include any recommendations.
If the audit is not an initial audit, the company shall also inform thecertification body so that the auditor can check the corrective actionplan from the previous audit.
The expected date for the initial or renewal audit shall be communi-cated to the IFS offices via the IFS Audit Portal. This shall be the respon-sibility of the certification body.
5.2 Certification body selection – contractualarrangements
In order to undertake the IFS PACsecure audit, the company shallappoint a certification body which is approved to perform such audits.It is the responsibility of the company to verify that the certificationbody is accredited for IFS PACsecure certification.
Only those IFS approved certification bodies – which shall be accreditedto ISO/IEC 17065 for IFS PACsecure and shall have signed a contractwith IFS (see Part 3) – can carry out IFS PACsecure audits and issuecertificates. The list of all IFS international approved certification bod-ies, by country, is available on the website www.ifs-certification.com.
Certification bodies can have auditors qualified for one or several prod-uct scopes. Confirmation of the product scopes for which the certifica-tion body can perform audits shall be obtained from the individual cer-tification body.
IFS PACsecure audits can be carried out by an audit team only if allmembers of the audit team are IFS approved auditors. Additionalrequirements for audit teams are described in detail in Part 3 of theStandard, chapter 3.6.
An auditor is not allowed to perform more than 3 consecutives audits ofthe same company’s site (whatever the time between audits); rules incase of audit team are also detailed in Part 3, chapter 3.6.
A contract shall exist between the company and the certification bodydetailing the scope of the audit, the duration and reporting require-
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 19
ments. The contract shall have a reference to Integrity Program (seechapter 12), in relation to the possibility of on-site audits organized byQuality Assurance Management of the IFS offices.
The audit shall take place when products of the audit scope are beingprocessed/converted.
The audit shall preferably be carried out in the language of the companybeing audited and the certification body shall make every attempt toappoint an auditor whose native language or main working language isthe language of the company. If this is not possible, the audit should becarried out in English language. Furthermore, languages used by theauditor for leading an audit – others than native language – shall beapproved by IFS offices prior to undertaking audits (see also Part 3).Nevertheless, and in all cases, the audit report, certificate and actionplan shall be written in English language.
5.3 Duration of an audit
The certification bodies have an appropriate system for estimating theminimum time needed for an audit.
A number of factors, which are detailed in the contract between thecertification body and the company, play a role in determining the timerequired for a comprehensive audit. They include:
– the size of the site
– the type of production/conversion process
– the scope of the audit
– the number of production lines involved
– the number of personnel employed at the site
– the number of non-conformities found in the previous audit.
Experience shows that the minimum audit duration on site shall be2 working days. Exceptions to this requirement, including decreasinglinked to multi-site companies, shall be precisely explained by the certi-fication body/the auditor on the first page of the report, in the “com-pany profile” field.
The audit duration might be extended, depending on the above factors.If the auditor estimates that additional time is necessary, the audit dura-tion shall be extended.
The above-mentioned requirements shall apply equally to renewalaudits, which shall be considered as completely new audits.
A normal audit day duration is 8 hours.
© IFS, October 2012
20 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
Independently from audit duration, besides on-site audit, preparation ofthe audit shall be at least 2 hours.
1/3 of the audit duration shall be spent, as a minimum, in the produc-tion/converting area of the site.
Additionally, time for generation of the audit report is typically 0,5 days.
Note 1: For multi-location companies, audit duration could be decreasedby a maximum of 0,5 days, if requirements have already been auditedat the central managing site.
Note 2: For an audit team, the minimum audit duration shall be 1 day.In addition to the calculated audit time, minimum 2 hours shall beadded. This additional time shall be allocated to the team and not to anindividual auditor for common tasks (e.g. opening and closing meeting,discussion about audit findings, etc.).
See also Part 3, chapter 3.6 about audit team.
5.4 Drawing up an audit time schedule
The certification body shall provide the audit time schedule. The audittime schedule includes appropriate details concerning the scope cov-ered and the complexity of the audit. The audit time schedule shall besufficiently flexible to respond to any unexpected events which mayarise during the site inspection activity within the certification audit.The audit time schedule takes into consideration a review of the auditreport and action plan relating to the previous audit, whatever the datewhen the previous audit has been performed. It also specifies which ofthe company’s products or product ranges are to be audited. The com-pany can only be audited at a time when it is actually producing/con-verting the products specified in the scope of the audit. The audit timeschedule shall be sent to the auditee before the audit, to ensure availa-bility of responsible persons at the day of the audit.
In case of an audit team, the audit time schedule shall clearly indicatewhich auditor performs which part of the audit.
If the IFS PACsecure audit is performed in combination with anotherstandard/norm, the audit time schedule shall clearly indicate when eachstandard or part of it has been audited.
The audit shall be scheduled based on the following steps:
– the opening meeting
– the evaluation of existing quality and product safety systems;achieved by checking documentation (HACCP/risk assessment,quality management documentation)
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 21
– the on-site inspection and interviewing of the personnel
– the final conclusions drawn from the audit
– the closing meeting.
The company will assist and co-operate with the auditor during theaudit. As part of the audit, personnel from different levels of manage-ment are interviewed. It is advisable that the company’s senior manag-ers are present at the opening and closing meetings so that any devia-tions and non-conformities can be discussed.
The auditor(s) who conduct(s) the audit will assess all the requirementsof IFS PACsecure which are relevant to the company’s structure andfunction.
During the closing meeting, the auditor (or lead auditor in the case of anaudit team) shall present all findings and discuss all deviations andnon-conformities which have been identified. As specified by ISO/IEC17065, the auditor may only issue a provisional assessment of compa-ny’s status during the closing meeting. The certification body shall issuea provisional audit report and outline an action plan to the company,which shall be used as a basis for drawing up corrective actions for thedetermined deviations and non-conformities.
The certification body is responsible for making the certification deci-sion and the preparation of the formal audit report after the receipt ofthe completed action plan. The issue of the certificate is dependent onthe audit results and on agreement on an appropriate action plan.
5.5 Evaluation of requirements
The auditor assesses the nature and significance of any deviation ornon-conformity. In order to determine whether compliance with arequirement of IFS PACsecure has been met, the auditor has to evaluateevery requirement in the Standard. There are different levels to rank thefindings.
5.5.1 Scoring a requirement as a deviation
In IFS PACsecure there are 4 scoring possibilities. Scoring with:
A: Full compliance with the requirement specified in the Standard
B: Almost full compliance with the requirement specified in the Stand-ard, but a small deviation was found
C: Only a small part of the requirement has been implemented
D: The requirement in the Standard has not been implemented
© IFS, October 2012
22 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
Points are awarded for each requirement according to the followingchart:
Chart N°1: Scoring
Result Explanation Points
A Full compliance 20 points
B (deviation) Almost full compliance 15 points
C (deviation) Small part of the requirement has been imple-mented
5 points
D (deviation) Requirement has not been implemented –20 points
The auditor shall explain all scorings with B, C and D in the audit report.
In addition to this scoring, the auditor can decide to give the company a“KO” or a “Major” non-conformity that will subtract points from thetotal amount. These possibilities are explained within the next chapters.
5.5.2 Scoring a requirement as a non-conformity
In IFS, there are two (2) kinds of non-conformities which are Major andKO. Both will lead to a subtraction of points from the total amount. If thecompany gets at least one of these non-conformities, the certificatecannot be awarded.
5.5.2.1 Major
A Major is defined as follows:A Major non-conformity can be given to any requirement which is notdefined as KO requirement.
When there is a substantial failure to meet the requirements of theStandard, which includes product safety and/or the legal requirementsof the production and destination countries. A Major can also be givenwhen the identified non-conformity can lead to a serious health hazard.
A Major will subtract 15% of the possible total amount of points.
Chart N° 2: Evaluation of a Major
Evaluation Scoring Result
Major 15% of possible total amount issubtracted
No certificate awarding ispossible
See also section 5.8 for the general management of audit process incase of Major non-conformity(ies).
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 23
5.5.2.2 KO (Knock out)
In IFS, there are specific requirements which are designated as KOrequirements (KO – Knock Out).
If during the audit the auditor establishes that these requirements arenot fulfiled by the company, this results in non-certification.
In IFS PACsecure the following 9 requirements are defined as KOrequirements:
1.2.4 Responsibility of the senior management
3.2.1.2 Personnel hygiene
4.2.1.2 Raw material specifications
4.2.2.1 Product formula compliance
4.12.1 Foreign material management
4.18.1 Traceability system
5.1.1 Internal audits
5.9.2 Procedure for withdrawal and recall
5.11.2 Corrective actions
KO requirements shall be evaluated according to the following scoringrules:
Chart N° 3: Scoring for a KO requirement
Result Explanation Awarded scores
A Full compliance 20 points
B (deviation) Almost full compliance 15 points
C (deviation) Small part of the requirementis implemented
No “C” scoring is possible
KO (= D) The requirement is notimplemented
50% of the possible total amountof points is subtracted => Nocertificate awarding is possible
Important noteA “C” scoring is not possible for KO requirements. In this respect, theauditor can only use A, B or D (= KO).
When a KO requirement has been scored as “D”, 50% of the possibletotal amount of points will be subtracted automatically meaning thatthe company is “not approved” for IFS PACsecure certification.
A KO cannot be scored with N/A, except KO 4.2.2.1.
See also section 5.8 for the general management of audit report in caseof one or several KO requirements.
© IFS, October 2012
24 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
5.5.3 Scoring a requirement with N/A (not applicable)
When the auditor decides that a requirement is not applicable for acompany, the auditor has to use as scoring:
N/A: Not applicable and provide a short explanation in the audit report.
N/A scoring is possible for any requirements of the IFS PACsecure auditchecklist, except for KO requirements (exception for KO 4.2.2.1).
N/A requirements shall not be included in the outline action plan, butthey shall be listed in a separate table in the audit report.
If there are a significant number of requirements which are deemed asnot applicable, using a total points score for the audit may be mislead-ing; however, the scoring system for IFS PACsecure is based on a per-centage of the total available score and it is this which is used to decidethe status of the site i.e. foundation or higher level.
5.6 Determination of the audit frequency
For all products and for all certification levels, the audit frequency forIFS PACsecure audits is 12 months, starting from the date of the auditand not the date of issue the certificate. Further regulations are describedin 6.2 (certification cycle).
5.7 Audit report
Following each audit, a full written report shall be prepared in the agreedformat (see Part 4).
5.7.1 Structure of the audit report
The audit report shall provide transparency and confidence to the readerand will be completed by the auditor. The audit report is subdivided intodifferent sections.
– General information about the company with compulsory fields(see Part 4)
– General audit result with detailed description of the scope
– General summary in a tabular format for all chapters. The resultof the audit will specify the level and percentage
– General summary of all chapters and comments about followup of corrective actions implemented from the previous audit
– Observations on KO requirements and Major non-conformities
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 25
– Summary of all established deviations and non-conformitiesfor each chapter (1 to 6)
– Separate list (including explanations) of all requirements evalu-ated with N/A (not applicable)
All deviations (B, C, D) and KO requirements scored with a B, non-con-formities (Major, KO requirement scored with a D) identified during theaudit, are presented in a separate action plan. Following the allocationof a grade, non-conformities and deviations, the company has to pro-duce a corrective action plan. In this way, the reader of the report cansee the non-conformities and deviations, and also the corrective actionsthat the company is initiating.
5.7.2 The different steps for the audit report
5.7.2.1 Drawing up the pre-report of the audit and the outline of theaction plan
The auditor shall explain all non-conformities (KO requirements scoredwith a D and Majors), all deviations (B, C, D) and KO requirementsscored with a B, and all requirements that are found N/A.
The action plan shall include all the requirements which are not evalu-ated with A or N/A. The outline action plan shall conform to the outlineaction plan as specified in Part 4, Annex 3. It shall include the elementsof the chart N° 4.
The auditor shall complete all of field A in chart N° 4 explaining andjustifying the deviations and non-conformities finding before sendingthe company the outline action plan and the pre-report of the audit.
The certification body or the auditor shall send the company both thepre-report of the audit and the outline action plan within two weeks ofthe audit date.
Note: If the auditor identified deviations during the audit and theaudited company has already planned corrective actions, the deviationsshall be noted in the audit report and a comment shall be added indicat-ing the company has already planned corrective actions.
© IFS, October 2012
26 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
Chart N° 4: Outline action plan
Numberof therequire-ment
IFS requirement Evalua-tion
Explanation(by theauditor)
Correctiveaction(by thecompany)
ResponsibilityDate andstatus ofimplementation(by thecompany)
Release bythe auditor
Field A Field B Field C Field D
1.2.1 An organisationchart …
B
1.2.2 Competences andresponsibilities …
C
1.2.3 Job descriptionswith clearly …
D
1.2.4 KO The senior manage-ment shall ensure …
KO/D
1.2.5 Employees withinfluence …
Major
5.7.2.2 Company’s completion of the corrective action plan
The company shall enter proposed corrective actions (field B of chartN° 4) for all deviations (B, C, D) and KO requirements scored with a Band non-conformities (Major, KO requirements scored with a D) listedby the auditor.
For all evaluated deviations with score C and D, as well as non-conform-ities, Major or KO requirements scored with a B and/or a D, the com-pany shall clearly state the responsibilities and implementation dead-lines for corrective action (chart N° 4, field C). The company shall forwardthe corrective action plan to the certification body within 2 weeks ofhaving received the pre-report of the audit and the action plan layout. Ifthis deadline is not respected, the company has to undergo a completeinitial or renewal audit.
An IFS PACsecure certificate shall not be awarded unless the correctiveactions for requirements scored with a C or D, and KO requirementsscored with B, specify responsibilities and implementation dates in theaction plan.
The final decision of awarding the IFS PACsecure certificate is depend-ent both on final scoring and on relevance of corrective action plancommunicated by the company to the certification body.
The company shall always submit a written corrective action plan beforereceiving the final report and the certificate. The intention of the correc-tive action plan is for the company to strive for continuous improve-ments.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 27
5.7.2.3 Auditor validation of the action plan
The auditor or a representative of the certification body shall validatethe relevance of the corrective actions in the last column of the actionplan before preparing the final audit report (Field D of the chart N° 4). Ifthe corrective actions are not valid or are inadequate, the certificationbody shall return the action plan to the company for completion in duetime.
5.7.3 Further rules about the audit report
5.7.3.1 Link between two consecutive audit reports (initial andrenewal audits)
When the auditor scores a requirement with C or D, corrective actionsshall be implemented before the renewal audit. This means the certifi-cation body shall read the audit report and the action plan of the previ-ous audit, even if the report was issued by another certification body.
If C and/or D scorings remain the same from one audit to the next, or ifscorings are getting worse, the auditor shall assess in accordance withthe IFS chapter related to “Corrective actions” (chapter 5.11 of the auditcheck-list, Part 2). This link between two consecutive audits ensures acontinuous improvement process.
© IFS, October 2012
28 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
5.8 Scoring and conditions for issuing audit report andcertificate
Chart N° 5: Scoring and awarding of certificates
Audit result Status Action company Report form Certificate
At least 1 KOscored with D
Not approved Actions and newinitial audit to beagreed upon
Report givesstatus
No
>1 Majorand/or <75%of therequirementsare fulfilled
Not approved Actions and newinitial audit to beagreed upon
Report givesstatus
No
Max 1 Majorand ≥75% ofthe require-ments arefulfilled
Not approvedunless furtheractions takenand validatedafter follow-up audit
Send completedaction planwithin 2 weeksof receiving thepreliminarilyreport. Follow-upaudit max.6 months afterthe audit date
Reportincludingaction plangives status
Certificate atfoundationlevel, if theMajor non-conformity isfinally solvedas controlledduring thefollow-upaudit
Total score is≥75% and<95%
Approved atfoundationIFS PACsecurelevel afterreceipt of theaction plan
Send completedaction planwithin 2 weeksof receiving thepreliminarilyreport.
Reportincludingaction plangives status
Yes, certifi-cate atfoundationlevel,12 monthsvalidity
Total score is≥95%
Approved athigherIFS PACsecurelevel afterreceipt of theaction plan
Send completedaction planwithin 2 weeksof receiving thepreliminarilyreport.
Reportincludingaction plangives status
Yes, certifi-cate at higherlevel,12 monthsvalidity
Note: the total score is calculated as follows:
Total number of points= (total number of IFS requirements – requirements scored with N/A)×20
Final score (in%)= number of points awarded/total number of points.
The certificate shall always be issued in English language. If requestedby the customer, it can additionally be issued in a different language.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 29
5.8.1 Specific management of the audit process (report,certificate, uploading) in case one or several KO’shas/have been scored with D during the audit(see also Annex 4)
In case one or several KO is/are scored with D during the audit, the cur-rent IFS PACsecure certificate shall be suspended in the IFS Audit Portalby the certification body as soon as possible and a maximum 2 workingdays after the audit date.
In the database, explanation about reasons for suspending the currentcertificate shall be given in English language. Clear explanations aboutthe identified non-conformity(ies) shall be provided by giving the num-ber of involved KO requirement(s). These explanations shall be detailedand be the same as those described in the action plan.
Note: All users having access to the IFS Audit Portal and having men-tioned the respective company in their favourites list will get an e-mailnotice from the IFS Audit Portal that the current certificate has beensuspended.
In each case, the audit shall be completed and all requirements shall beevaluated in order to give the company a complete overview about itssituation.
Furthermore, it is recommended to complete the action plan forimprovement purposes.
The audit report where one or several KO requirement(s) have beenscored with D shall always be uploaded into the IFS Audit Portal (onlyfor administrative purpose, but will not be visible).
In these situations, a complete new audit shall be performed. The newaudit shall be scheduled no earlier than 6 weeks after the audit where aKO requirement was scored with D.
5.8.2 Specific management of the audit process (report,certificate, uploading) in case one or several Major non-conformity(ies) has/have been issued (see also Annex 4)
In case one or several Major non-conformity(ies) is/are issued duringthe audit, the current IFS PACsecure certificate shall be suspended inthe IFS Audit Portal by the certification body as soon as possible and amaximum 2 working days after the audit date.
In the database, explanation about reasons for suspending the currentcertificate shall be given in English language. Clear explanations aboutthe identified non-conformity(ies) shall be provided by giving the num-ber of involved requirement(s). These explanations shall be detailedand be the same as those described in the action plan.
© IFS, October 2012
30 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
In cases where more than one Major non-conformity have been identi-fied, a complete new audit shall be performed. The new audit shall bescheduled no earlier than 6 weeks after the audit where Major non-conformities were issued.
If the Major non-conformity is related to production failure(s), the fol-low up audit shall be performed at least 6 weeks after the previous auditand no later than 6 months after the previous audit. For other kinds offailures (e.g. documentation), the certification body is responsible forthe determination of the date of the follow-up audit.
The audit report where one or several Major non-conformity(ies)has/have been identified shall always be uploaded into the IFS AuditPortal after receiving the action plan (only for administrative purpose,but will not be visible).
Specific situation in case of follow-up audit:If a Major non-conformity has been identified with a total score of 75%or above and then resolved, and if the audit result is deemed positive:
The certification body shall mention on the updated audit report:
– in the “date” section: specify the date of the follow up audit inaddition to the date of audit when the Major non-conformitywas identified,
– in the “final result of audit” section: specify that a follow upaudit has taken place and that the Major non-conformity hasbeen solved,
– in the “observations regarding KO non-conformities andMajors” section explain on which requirement the Major non-conformity has been solved.
· The company cannot be certified with higher level even if thefinal total score is equal or more than 95%.
· The same valid date of the certificate remains in the certifica-tion cycle as described in 6.2.
· It shall be defined on the certificate the date of initial auditand date of follow up audit.
· If it was during an initial audit, the longest certificate validdue date is calculated using initial audit date, plus one yearand 8 weeks.
Example:Initial audit date 1: 01. October, 2012Date of issue of certificate: 26. November, 2012Certificate valid until: 25. November, 2013Renewal date(audit where Major has been issued) 2: 25. September, 2013Follow up audit: 03. December, 2013Latest date of validity of the certificate: 25. November, 2014.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 31
The report (first of the audit with the estimated Major, then updatedwith results of follow up audit) shall be uploaded into the IFS AuditPortal after performing the follow up audit with the proviso that theMajor non-conformity is finally solved.
5.8.3 Specific management of the audit process in case thefinal score is <75%
In these situations, the certification is failed and a complete new auditshall be performed. The new audit shall be scheduled no earlier than 6weeks after the audit where the final score was <75%.
5.8.4 Specific management of the audit process in case ofmulti-site companies
All KO requirements shall be audited at all sites even if some of themare partly managed at the central managing site.
In the audit report of each site, only the audit date of the respective siteshall be mentioned; the audit date of managing site is not additionallynecessary.
In case that a Major non-conformity or a KO scored with D has beenissued during the audit of the central managing site, all audited produc-tion sites are also affected and the certificates of these sites shall besuspended (according the procedure described above).
After a successful audit of the central managing site (or after positivefollow-up after a Major was issued in the central managing site), thecertificates of the production sites can be reinstated. Depending uponwhich non-conformity has been issued in the central managing site, anew audit of the production sites may also be necessary.
6 Awarding the certificate
A certificate shall be issued to one specific site.
Detailed minimum mandatory information to be published on the IFSPACsecure certificate is determined in Part 4.
Note: the final audit score, in percentage, can also be published on thecertificate, if required by customer and/or audited company.
© IFS, October 2012
32 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
6.1 Deadlines for awarding certificate
The certification body is responsible for the decision to award or notaward the IFS PACsecure certificate. The decision is made by person(s)other than those who have carried out the audit. The certification shallbe valid effectively from the date of issue stated on the certificate itselfand shall end after 12 months. The date for the renewal audit shall becalculated from the date of the initial audit, not from the date of issuethe certificate. If the audit is not performed in due time, the retailers orother users will be informed via the Audit Portal.
The time between the date of the audit and the awarding of certificate isdetermined as follows:
– 2 weeks to draw up the pre-report of the audit
– 2 weeks for the company to respond to the deviations and non-conformities (i.e. draw up the action plan)
– 2 weeks for the auditor to check the proposed corrective actions,for the certification procedure and upload of the audit report,the action plan and the certificate to the Audit Portal.
In total: 6 weeks between the date of audit and uploading the auditreport to the Audit Portal and awarding the certificate:
– Target time: 6 weeks,
– Maximum time: 8 weeks.
6.2 Certification cycle
Even if the renewal audit due date changes every year and does notcompletely correspond to the anniversary date, the certificate validitydate shall remain the same each year. Due date of the certificate isdetermined as follows: initial audit date + 8 weeks.
This allows to avoid gaps between two (2) consecutive certificates andto avoid that a company scheduling the audit earlier loses some monthsof certificate validity.
Example:Initial audit date: 01. October, 2012Date of issue of certificate: 26. November, 2012Certificate valid until: 25. November, 2013
Renewal audit date: 25. September, 2013Certificate valid until: 25. November, 2014 (independently from
the renewal audit date).
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 33
Chart N° 6: Certification cycle
Note: the certificate shall always be edited on the basis of a certificationdecision and after the several steps of certification decision accordingto ISO/IEC 17065.
Ideally, the renewal audit shall be performed within eight (8) weeks ofthe date of expiry of certificate to have enough time for the severalsteps of the certification process.
The renewal audit shall be scheduled at earliest eight (8) weeks beforeand at latest two (2) weeks after the audit due date (due date is anniver-sary date of the initial audit). If this is not the case, or if the several stepsof the certification process were not completed in time, the certificatecannot be renewed with the “due date” but with the actual new date;this will lead to a break in the certification.
In the example above, this means that the audit shall never be sched-uled before 06. August and after 15. October.
The previous audit report remains a further eight (8) weeks (after auditdue date) on the Audit Portal, but if the renewal audit takes place laterthan described above, the report will be automatically inactivated fromthe IFS Audit Portal.
6.3 Information about conditions of withdrawal ofcertificate
Withdrawal of certificate by the certification body is only permitted incase of any information indicating that the product may no longer com-ply with the requirements of the certification system (ISO/IEC 17065).
The only exception of this rule may be related to the non-payment ofthe current audit by the certified company.
The contract between certification body and audited company shall beharmonized with the certification cycle (see above chart N° 6).
IA:01.10. 2012
IA: Initial auditRA: Renewal auditC: Issue a certificate valid until
RA:25.09.2013
C:25.11.2013
C:25.11.2014
C:25.11.2015
RA:05. 10.2014
< 12 months >12 months
= 12 months =12 months
Oct.2012
Nov. Sept.2013
O Nov.D J F MAM J J A D J F MAM J J A S Oct.2014
Nov. D J F MAM J J A S
© IFS, October 2012
34 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
7 Distribution and storage of the auditreport
Audit reports shall remain the property of the company and shall not bereleased, in whole or part, to a third party without the company’s priorconsent (except where required by law). This consent for distribution ofthe audit report must be in writing and can be granted by the companyvis-à-vis the certification body and/or vis-à-vis the relevant user. Thecertification body shall keep a copy of the audit report. The audit reportshall be stored safely and securely for a period of five years.
Access conditions to information about audit reports are fully detailedin Part 4.
8 Supplementary action
The decision on the level of supplementary actions required on thebasis of the certificate shall be made at the discretion of the individualbuying organisation.
9 Appeal and complaints procedure
The certification body shall have documented procedures for the con-sideration and resolution of appeals against the results of an audit.These procedures shall be independent of the individual auditor andwill be considered by senior management of the certification body.Appeals will be finalised within 20 working days of receiving informa-tion from the auditee.
The certification body shall have documented general procedures forhandling complaints received from the companies and/or other relevantparties. An initial response will be given within ten (10) working days ofreceiving the complaint. A letter confirming receipt of the complaint willbe issued within a maximum of five (5) working days. A full writtenresponse will be given after the completion of a full and thorough inves-tigation into a complaint.
For the handling of complaints received by the IFS offices, the basis forthe complaint management is described in the IFS framework agree-ment with certification bodies:
– If the complaint relates to the quality of the content of IFS PAC-secure audits or IFS PACsecure audit reports, IFS offices requirethe certification body to provide a statement on the cause andthe measures introduced to rectify the problem within 2 weeks.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 35
– If the complaint relates to administrative errors, e.g. in IFS PAC-secure audit reports, IFS PACsecure certificates or in the IFSdatabase, IFS offices ask the certification body to provide astatement and rectify the problem within one (1) week. Thestatement shall be issued in writing by e-mail or post.
10 Ownership and usage of theIFS PACsecure logo
The copyright of IFS PACsecure and the registered trademark is fullyowned by the IFS Management GmbH. The IFS PACsecure logo can bedownloaded via the secured section of the IFS Audit Portal.
Furthermore, the below terms and conditions shall be checked by theauditor during the audit and results of this check shall be described inthe company profile of the audit report as a compulsory field (see Part 4,section 1.1). If the auditor identifies during an audit that the companydoes not fulfil the conditions of logo usage, the auditor shall note it inthe company profile of the audit report and shall inform the IFS officesaccordingly.
Terms and conditions for using the IFS PACsecure logo and communi-cation about the IFS PACsecure certification
ApplicationThese terms and conditions apply for both IFS PACsecure and all IFSlogos in general.
Form, design and colour of the IFS PACsecure logoWhen used, the IFS PACsecure logo must comply with the form andcolour of the scale drawing. If it is used in documents, black and whiteprint is also permitted.
The IFS PACsecure logo can be used in print, physical and electronicform, and in films, providing the forms and formats are respected. Thesame conditions apply to the use of the logo as a stamp.
Restriction of comment and interpretationsWhen an IFS PACsecure certified company, an IFS PACsecure support-ing company or an IFS PACsecure certification body publishes docu-ments bearing the IFS logo, comment and interpretations referring tothe IFS shall be clearly identifiable as such.
Use of the IFS PACsecure logo in promotional materialAn IFS PACsecure certified company, an IFS PACsecure supportingcompany (broker, food manufacturer, retailer, logistics provider orwholesaler) which accepts IFS PACsecure certificates from their suppli-ers or service providers, or an IFS certification body may use the IFS
© IFS, October 2012
36 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
logo for promotional reasons and publish information about IFS certifi-cation provided that it is not visible on final product packaging whichare available to the end-consumer (B to C business).
Companies which provide products and/or services to IFS certified orsupporting companies, but which are not themselves IFS certified (e.g.manufacturers of devices, clothing, cleaning materials or service pro-viders which would like to promote that their products and/or serviceshelp to fulfil the IFS requirements) must ask for express written permis-sion to IFS Management GmbH to use the IFS PACsecure logo and/orany other IFS logo(s).
The IFS PACsecure logo and information about the certification may beused in correspondence with relevant IFS users. Presentations mention-ing IFS on the internet are only permitted if they are in a direct link withproduct safety (e.g. within information about the safety/quality man-agement system).
The IFS PACsecure logo may be displayed on any kind of general com-munication (e.g. exhibitions for business contacts, brochures, genericarticles about packaging, product safety and quality management ingeneral, vehicles). The IFS PACsecure Standard was developed in orderto assure the product safety and quality.
It must be ensured that all information concerning certifications refersclearly to IFS. The IFS logo may not be used in presentations having noclear connection to IFS.
Further restriction on the use of the IFS PACsecure logoThe IFS PACsecure logo shall not be used in a way that could showintent that the IFS owner is responsible for the certification decision.Furthermore, the same applies for opinions and interpretations whichcould be deriven from it. In the event of suspension or withdrawal of theIFS PACsecure certification, the certified company has to immediatelystop the inclusion of the IFS logo on its documents or other associatedmaterial and cease all communications regarding IFS. The audited com-pany must demonstrate that they have complied with these require-ments.
Communication of the IFS PACsecure certificationAll the above mentioned rules apply to any communication regardingIFS PACsecure. This also means that using the wordmarks “IFS”, “Inter-national Featured Standards”, or “IFS PACsecure” or similar is notallowed when communicating on finished products, which are availableto the end-consumer.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 37
11 Review of the Standard
The Review Committee needs to demonstrate control of the quality andcontent of the Standard and will review annually the Standard and theProtocol to ensure that they are still in compliance with their require-ments. The Review Committee shall be formed with all participantsinvolved in the audit process: the representatives of retailers, repre-sentatives of the industry, of (non) food services and of certificationbodies. The objective of the Review Committee is to share experiences,discuss and decide about the changes to the Standard, the requirementsof the audit report and training.
12 IFS Integrity Program
The IFS Integrity Program launched in early 2010 includes differentmeasures to assure the quality of the IFS certification scheme, with afocus on the review of audits conducted by the IFS certification bodiesand their auditors.
There are two cornerstones of this program:
12.1 Preventive quality assurance actions
Quality assurance activities monitor the entire IFS system. Surveillanceaudits at the certification body offices and on-site supplier audits arecarried out on a regular basis in order to assess the IFS system. Theseaudits are undertaken regardless of whether or not a complaint hasbeen made. The sampling for these surveillance audits is based on arandom selection process and by use of objective criteria. These criteriaare both economic criteria (e.g. number of issued certificates) and qual-ity criteria (e.g. the review and analyses of IFS certification processesand corresponding reports).
A surveillance office audit of a certification body (CB) takes place at theaccredited certification body’s premises to verify the correct applicationof the IFS regulations at the certification body offices and to promotecontinuous improvement.
Additionally, surveillance on-site supplier audits at certified companiesmay be undertaken. In general, surveillance on-site supplier audits areannounced 48 hours before the audit date. In these audits the documen-tation reviewed in the office audit of the certification body, or in the IFSdatabase, is compared with the real situation found at the company.
Witness audits can also be performed. In this case, Integrity auditorsassess an IFS PACsecure auditor during a real IFS PACsecure audit.
© IFS, October 2012
38 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
12.2 Quality assurance actions after complaintnotification
A detailed complaint management process analyzes all necessary infor-mation. Retailers or any other interested parties have the right to for-ward any possible non-conformity to IFS for investigation as part of theIntegrity Program.
The IFS Offices collect complaints concerning IFS PACsecure audits,reports, certificates or other circumstances in which the integrity ofthe IFS brand is in question. Retailers, certification bodies, employeesof IFS-certified companies or any person can use the complaint formon the IFS website www.ifs-certification.com or can send an e-mail [email protected] to inform IFS about a cer-tain issue. In addition to any complaints received, IFS also analyses theIFS database using analytical tools in order to identify any deficiencies.If IFS Quality Assurance Management is informed of significant discrep-ancies between the results of an IFS PACsecure audit and a subsequentretailer audit, this will be investigated within the complaint manage-ment process as described below.
The IFS Offices will gather all necessary information in order to investi-gate the cause of the complaint and to establish if there are deficienciesby certified companies, accredited certification bodies or IFS-approvedauditors in meeting IFS requirements. Appropriate steps are taken tofully investigate a complaint, which may include a request to a certifica-tion body to carry out internal investigations and provide a statementon the outcome of their investigations to IFS.
In the event that a complaint cannot be successfully resolved by theinvestigation undertaken by the certification body, an on-site investiga-tion audit will be undertaken at the certified company(s). In general,investigation audits are announced 48 hours before the audit date,however in special cases unannounced audits are undertaken.
Witness audits can also be performed. In this case, Integrity auditorsassess an IFS PACsecure auditor during a real IFS PACsecure audit.
Audits carried out as part of the Integrity Program are conducted byauditors employed by IFS and completely independent of the auditees.
12.3 Sanctions
If, following a complaint or preventive quality assurance actions, thecause of a deficiency has been found to be the fault of a certificationbody and/or an auditor, IFS will forward all necessary informationanonymously to an independent Sanction Committee. The SanctionCommittee, which is made up of a lawyer and participants from indus-try, retailers and certification bodies, shall make a decision on whethera breach exists and on its severity.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 39
Sanctions will be issued to the certification body and/or its auditors ifthe Sanction Committee concludes that a breach has been committed.The type of sanction depends on the number of breaches previouslycommitted by the auditor and/or the certification body as well as thelevel of severity of such breaches. IFS Management informs the appro-priate accreditation body if a breach for a certification body and/or foran auditor has been established.
All these procedures are laid down in the contract between IFS andeach certification body and all stakeholders of the IFS system areinformed of the process. The IFS Integrity Program strengthens the reli-ability of the IFS scheme by checking the implementation of the IFSStandard in practice.
Chart N° 7: Summary of IFS Integrity Program activities
Integrity Program
Complaintmanagement
Preventive QAmeasures
Surveillanceaudits
On-sitesupplier
audit
IFS qualitymanagement
sufficient evidenceat hand/breach
likely
Investigationaudits
Witnessaudit
CB officeaudit
CB officeaudit
On-sitesupplier
audit
Chairmanlawyer
Participantfrom retailers
Participant fromthe industry
Sanction committee
Participant from CBswithout right to vote
Witnessaudit
© IFS, October 2012
40 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
ANNEX 1: Clarification for the scope applicationof the different IFS Standards
IFS PACsecure is a Standard for auditing food and non-food packagingmaterial manufacturers and converters and only concerns packagingprocessing and/or converting companies.
IFS Food is a Standard for auditing food product suppliers/manufactur-ers and only concerns food processing companies or companies thatpack loose food products. IFS Food shall be used when a product is“processed” or when there is a hazard for product contamination dur-ing the primary packing.
IFS Logistics is a Standard for auditing companies whose activities arelogistics oriented for food and non-food products, as well as packagingmaterials, such as transport, storage, distribution, loading/unloading,etc. It applies to all types of activities: delivery by road, rail or ship; fro-zen/refrigerated products or ambient stable products.
Clarifications/examples of scope application between IFS PACsecureand IFS Logistics:
– IFS Logistics only concerns logistics activities where compa-nies have a physical contact with already processed/convertedpackaging materials (transport, storage and/or distribution,transport and storage of pallets). When the processing com-pany has its own logistics and/or transport department/activi-ties (storage and distribution), it is included in the IFS PACse-cure under the specific sub-chapter about transport or storage.
Note: If the logistics operation owned by the processing com-pany is situated in the same location as the company, and if thecompany or the customer wishes to get this operation IFSLogistics certified, an IFS Logistics audit can be performed.
In this case, the following requirements shall be fulfiled:
· the logistics operation is only used for already packed pack-aging materials,
· in case of two (2) certificates (IFS PACsecure and Logistics),the respective scopes of each audit and certificate shall beclearly defined,
· the requirements of IFS PACsecure concerning transport andstorage shall be anyway evaluated during the IFS PACsecureaudit,
· an IFS PACsecure audit of the processing company shall beperformed; IFS Logistics is an additional audit,
· all relevant documents shall be located at the platform.
– If logistics and/or transport activities are outsourced by the pro-cessing company, the requirements specified in the appropri-
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 41
ate chapter of IFS PACsecure about storage and transport shallbe clearly defined in the respective contract, or IFS Logisticsapplies.
IFS Broker is a Standard for auditing companies such as trade agencies,brokers or any other companies that do not take physical possession ofthe products or material (e.g. which do not have warehouses, packingstations or truck fleet, but are legal entities with mailboxes, offices etc.).The Standard applies to food, packaging and household and personalcare products.
Matrix for the determination of the right IFS Standard
N° Main activity of the company International Featured Standards
IFSFood
IFSHPC
IFSLog. 2
IFSBroker
IFSC&C/W.
IFSPACsecure
1 Food processing(when products are processed or as soon asthere is a hazard for product contamination)
X
2 HPC processing(when products are processed or as soon asthere is a hazard for product contamination)
X
3 Food, Non-Food, HPC, packaging materialslogistics activitiesLogistics activities only as service, no tradingactivities(when companies have a physical contactwith already primary packed products oronly for specific unpacked goods, such asmeat carcasses or bulk/tanker transport(glucose syrup, milk, grain, etc.)
X
4 Food, HPC, packaging trading withoutproduct contact(when no physical possession of products,only purchase – sale from an office, nologistics activities)
X
5 Cash & Carry/Wholesale(when distribution of products, small amountof processing activities can be included,under specific requirements)
X
6 Packaging materials processing/converting(when packaging products are processed/converted)
X
Combined certification
7 Food/HPC/packaging material trading andFood/HPC/packaging material logisticsCombined audit for trading AND logisticsactivities, with a specific combined check-list
X X
© IFS, October 2012
42 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
ANNEX 2: Certification process
Voluntary: Pre-Audit
Together withcertification body:· Determination of
the audit date· Determination of
audit times· Definition of the
audit scope
Determination ofMajors, KO – Audit
not approved
Action plan andpreliminary audit
report sent toaudited company
Voluntary comple-tion of the actionplan and return to
the certification body
Finalisation of theaction plan and
report – upload intothe IFS Audit portal
No certificate
Action plan andpreliminary audit
report sent toaudited company
Corrective actions ofthe non-conformities
which have led tothe Major within
6 months
Validation of thecorrective actionsby the certification
body
Determination of1 Major and particu-lar circumstances –
Not approved beforefurther actions
Suspensionof the
currentcertificate
Suspensionof the
currentcertificate
4. Selection by the company of the IFS certification body(accredited and approved).
Quotation, decision and signature of contract
3. Evaluation of the current status by the company
2. Reading of the respective copy of IFS Standard
1. Decision by the company to get certified againstthe IFS Standard
6. Closing meetingInformation about the determined non-conformities
Opening meeting – Evaluation of the documentation –Site assessment and interviews of employees – Creation of the audit conclusions
5. Audit planning and preparationRealisation of the audit on-site at the determined date,
by an auditor competent in the relevant scopes
7. Preparation of a preliminary audit report andpreparation of action plan by the auditor (2 weeks)
12. Awarding of certificate and sending of the final reportto the audited company
11. Certification decision, determinationof the certificate validity by the certification body
10. Proofreading of the completed action plan by thecertification body/auditor
Checking the complete audit report and action plan(with mandatory review) by the certification body
9. Return of the fulfilled action planto the certification body/auditor (2 weeks)
8. Completion of the action plan and determinationof corrective actions by the audited company (2 weeks)
13. Uploading of the audit data’s into the IFS Audit portal(audit details, report, action plan and certificate)
by the certification body
14. Three months before the audit expires, a reminderwill be sent to the company by the IFS Audit portal for
scheduling a new audit with the certification body.The audit shall be scheduled no later than the renewal
audit date scheduled in the certificate.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 1 43
ANNEX 3: Product scopes
In IFS PACsecure version 1, all activities of the company are related toproduct scopes as follows:
Table 1: Product scopes
1. Flexible packaging
2. Rigid plastic
3. Paper
4. Metal
5. Glass
6. Other natural materials
Multi component packaging materials (e.g. Tetra Pak) have to beassigned based on the material which is the main component of thematerial. The main component of multi component packaging materi-als shall be mentioned in the scope of the audit on the report.
Materials to be considered as “other natural materials” are, for exam-ple wood, clay, cork, jute, textiles, banana leaves, etc.
© IFS, October 2012
44 Part 1 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
ANNEX 4: Flow chart for management of KOscored with D and Major non-conformities
Uploading final IFS report in portal (visible):In case of follow up audit:– Define in the “date” section date of initial audit and date of
follow up audit– Define in the “final result of audit” section that a follow audit
has taken place and that the Major has been solved– In the “observations regarding KO and Majors”, explain on
which requirement Major has been solvedThe company can not be certified with higher level, even if thefinal score is ≥95%Date of end of validity of certificate based on date of initial audit
Follow-up audit, if <6 monthsbetween audit where Majorwas issued and next audit(earliest after six (6) weeks
in case of failure concerningproduction activities)
Full new audit, scheduled not earlierthan six (6) weeks after the audit
where non-conformity(ies) was/wereidentified
Uploading report in IFS portal(not visible)
Uploading final IFS report in portal(visible)
Recommended: completion of theaction plan by the audited companyand return to the certification body
within two (2) weeks
Send preliminary report and actionplan template to the audited company
Positive auditresult
Positive auditresult
Timeperiod to the
next auditTimeperiod to the
next audit
Auditresult
Not approved
Suspension of the current certificate,max. two (2) working days after audit
dateInserting the explanations in English
about non-conformity(ies) in IFS portal
>1 Major and/or <75% orMore than one Major or
One or several KO’s scored with D
Uploading report in IFS portal(not visible)
Initial audit, if >6 monthsbetween audit where Majorwas issued and next audit
Mandatory: completion of the actionplan by the audited company and
return to the certification body withintwo (2) weeks
Send preliminary report and actionplan template to the audited company
Suspension of the current certificate,max. two (2) working days after audit
dateInserting the explanations in Englishabout non conformity in IFS portal
1 Major and ≥75% of the require-ments are fulfilled =>15% of the total
possible amount is subtracted
Not approved unless further actionsare taken and validated after follow-
up audit
IFS PACsecure audit
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 45
Part 2: List of audit requirements
The following list contains the IFS PACsecure auditing requirements.
The below chart demonstrates the connection between IFS PACsecureand PACsecure Prerequisite Program requirements. Additionally, thereare examples given on questions auditors should ask (5th column) andexamples for KO or Major scoring (6th column).
The PACsecure Packaging Material Manufacturer & Converter GenericFood Safety Prerequisite Program (PP) contains foundation require-ments on documentation, management and food safety program main-tenance, and considers current packaging industry practices. The IFSPACsecure was developed taking into account this Program.
PACsecure documents, workbooks and plans (Packaging MaterialManufacturer & Converter Generic Food Safety Prerequisite Program,HACCP Workbooks and HACCP Plans) can be obtained from the Packag-ing Association of Canada. These documents can assist, for example, inimplementing HACCP for a specific packaging material manufacturer,like e.g. manufacturers of flexible packaging and may be used as indus-try guidelines as mentioned in requirement 2.2.1.1
© IFS, October 2012
46 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
1S
enio
rM
anag
emen
tR
esp
on
sib
ility
5.0
1.1
Co
rpo
rate
po
licy/
Co
rpo
rate
pri
nci
ple
s
1.1.
1T
he
sen
ior
man
agem
ent
shal
ldra
wu
pan
dim
ple
men
ta
corp
ora
tep
olic
y.T
his
shal
lco
nsi
der
asa
min
imu
m:
–cu
sto
mer
focu
s–
envi
ron
men
talr
esp
on
sib
ility
–su
stai
nab
ility
–et
hic
san
dp
erso
nn
elre
spo
nsi
bili
ty–
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
(in
clu
des
:p
rod
uct
safe
ty,q
ual
ity,
leg
alit
y,p
roce
ssan
dsp
ecifi
cati
on
).T
he
corp
ora
tep
olic
ysh
allb
eco
mm
un
icat
edto
alle
mp
loye
es.
5.0
Man
agem
ent
com
mit
-m
ent
toth
efo
od
safe
tysy
stem
isre
qu
ired
.Th
ism
ayb
ed
emo
nst
rate
db
yth
ed
evel
op
men
tan
dap
pro
valo
fa
foo
dsa
fety
po
licy
or
oth
erst
atem
ents
of
com
mit
-m
ent
toth
efo
od
safe
tysy
stem
.
–H
ow
and
wh
ere
isco
rpo
rate
po
licy
do
cum
ente
d?
–W
hat
are
the
con
ten
tso
fth
eco
rpo
rate
po
licy?
–H
ow
was
corp
ora
tep
olic
yco
mm
un
icat
edto
alle
mp
loye
es?
–<c
orp
ora
tep
olic
y>,<
po
ster
s><d
ocu
-m
ente
dev
iden
ceo
fco
rpo
rate
po
licy
com
mu
nic
atio
n>
En
viro
nm
enta
lres
po
nsi
bili
tyan
dsu
stai
n-
abili
tyar
ein
clu
ded
inth
eIF
SPA
Cse
cure
Sta
nd
ard
,eve
nif
itis
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
safe
tyan
dq
ual
ity
stan
dar
d,i
no
rder
toin
itia
te/d
evel
op
inco
mp
anie
sp
roce
sses
of
awar
enes
sfo
rb
oth
top
ics.
1.1.
2T
he
corp
ora
tep
olic
ysh
allh
ave
ob
ject
ives
spec
ifyi
ng
resp
on
sib
iliti
esan
dti
mel
ines
app
rop
riat
efo
rth
esi
zean
dco
mp
lexi
tyo
fth
eo
rgan
izat
ion
.
–W
hat
sho
rt,m
ediu
man
dlo
ng
term
qu
alit
yo
bje
ctiv
esar
ead
dre
ssed
?–
Ho
war
eth
eo
bje
ctiv
esat
tain
ed?
–W
hat
isth
eti
me
fram
eto
atta
inth
eo
bje
ctiv
es?
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
ob
ject
ives
atta
in-
men
t?–
Wh
atac
tio
ns
are
take
nb
ysp
ecifi
cd
epar
tmen
ts,e
.g.p
urc
has
e,to
atta
inth
eo
bje
ctiv
es?
–<w
ritt
enre
view
mee
tin
gm
inu
tes>
,<l
ist
of
atte
nd
ees
atre
view
mee
tin
g>,
<qu
alit
yo
bje
ctiv
es>
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 47
1.1.
3Fr
om
the
corp
ora
tep
olic
y,th
eq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
ob
ject
ives
shal
lbe
com
mu
ni-
cate
dto
the
emp
loye
esin
the
resp
ec-
tive
dep
artm
ents
and
shal
lbe
effe
ctiv
ely
imp
lem
ente
d.
–W
hat
qu
alit
yo
bje
ctiv
esar
ed
efin
ed?
–A
reth
ese
ob
ject
ives
kno
wn
by
con
cern
edem
plo
yees
?–
Wh
atto
ols
are
use
dto
mea
sure
that
the
ob
ject
ives
hav
eb
een
atta
ined
?–
<lis
to
fat
ten
dee
sat
revi
ewm
eeti
ng
>,<m
ailin
glis
to
fre
view
mee
tin
gm
inu
tes>
,<p
ost
ers
sho
win
gth
ed
iffe
ren
td
epar
t-m
ent
ob
ject
ives
>
1.1.
4T
he
sen
ior
man
agem
ent
shal
len
sure
that
the
ach
ieve
men
to
fal
lob
ject
ives
isre
gu
larl
yre
view
ed,a
sa
min
imu
mat
leas
to
nce
aye
ar.
–W
hen
iso
bje
ctiv
eac
hie
vem
ent
revi
ewed
?–
Ho
wo
ften
isth
isre
view
per
form
ed?
–<r
evie
w>,
<rev
iew
min
ute
s>,
<in
tern
alau
dit
rep
ort
>
Th
ere
isb
asic
ally
no
revi
ew/o
ther
rati
ng
of
ob
ject
ives
avai
lab
le.
1.1.
5A
llre
leva
nt
info
rmat
ion
rela
ted
top
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yan
dq
ual
ity
shal
lbe
com
mu
nic
ated
effe
ctiv
ely
and
ina
tim
ely
man
ner
toth
ere
leva
nt
per
son
nel
.
–H
ow
isre
leva
nt
info
rmat
ion
tran
smit
ted
toco
nce
rned
per
son
s?–
<po
ster
s>,<
dis
trib
uti
on
of
mee
tin
gm
inu
tes>
Ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
safe
tyan
d/o
rle
gal
ity
issu
eo
ccu
rsd
ue
tom
issi
ng
com
mu
nic
a-ti
on
wit
hin
the
com
pan
y.
1.2
Co
rpo
rate
stru
ctu
re
1.2.
1A
no
rgan
isat
ion
char
tsh
allb
eav
aila
ble
sho
win
gth
est
ruct
ure
of
the
com
pan
y.
–Is
ano
rgan
isat
ion
char
tav
aila
ble
?–
Ho
wis
the
org
anis
atio
nst
ruct
ure
d?
–<o
rgan
isat
ion
char
t>
1.2.
2C
om
pet
ence
san
dre
spo
nsi
bili
ties
,in
clu
din
gd
epu
tati
on
of
resp
on
sib
il-it
ysh
allb
ecl
earl
yla
idd
ow
n.
–Fo
rw
hic
hp
osi
tio
ns
do
wri
tten
job
des
crip
tio
ns
exis
t?–
Wh
atis
reg
ula
ted
inth
ejo
bd
escr
ipti
on
s?–
Wh
o,f
or
exam
ple
sub
stit
ute
sQ
Am
an-
ager
du
rin
gh
isab
sen
ce?
–<r
esp
on
sib
ility
des
crip
tio
nfo
rim
po
rtan
tke
yst
aff
“ded
icat
edto
asp
ecifi
cp
erso
n”,
e.g
.QA
Man
ager
,Pro
du
ctio
nM
anag
er,
Sh
ift
Lead
er…
>
Wh
ena
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lSaf
ety
and
Leg
alit
yis
sue
occ
urs
du
eto
failu
reto
defi
ne
resp
on
sib
iliti
esfo
rex
isti
ng
com
pan
yre
gu
lati
on
s.
1.2.
3Jo
bd
escr
ipti
on
sw
ith
clea
rly
defi
ned
resp
on
sib
iliti
essh
alle
xist
and
shal
lb
eap
plic
able
for
emp
loye
esw
ho
sew
ork
has
anef
fect
on
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
.
5.0
For
each
pre
req
uis
ite
pro
gra
man
dH
AC
CP
Pla
nth
ere
spo
nsi
bili
tyfo
rco
mp
lyin
gw
ith
the
req
uir
emen
tso
fth
isst
and
ard
isas
sig
ned
toa
com
pet
ent
emp
loye
e.
–W
hat
isth
eco
nte
nt
of
the
job
des
crip
-ti
on
s?–
For
wh
ich
po
siti
on
sd
ojo
bd
escr
ipti
on
sex
ist?
© IFS, October 2012
48 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
1.2.
4K
OK
ON
°1:
Th
ese
nio
rm
anag
emen
tsh
alle
nsu
reth
atem
plo
yees
are
awar
eo
fth
eir
resp
on
sib
iliti
esre
late
dto
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
qu
alit
yan
dth
atm
ech
anis
ms
are
inp
lace
tom
on
ito
rth
eef
fect
ive-
nes
so
fth
eir
op
erat
ion
.Su
chm
ech
anis
ms
shal
lbe
clea
rly
iden
ti-
fied
and
do
cum
ente
d.
5.0
Th
eau
tho
rity
tod
evel
op
,im
ple
men
tan
dm
ain
tain
the
pre
req
uis
ite
pro
gra
ms
will
be
esta
blis
hed
by
man
agem
ent.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
emp
loye
eskn
ow
thei
rre
spo
nsi
bili
ties
?–
Ho
wd
oes
sen
ior
man
agem
ent
ensu
reth
atem
plo
yees
kno
wth
eir
resp
on
sib
ili-
ties
?–
Wh
ois
resp
on
sib
lefo
rp
acka
gin
gm
ate-
rial
safe
ty?
Wh
ense
nio
rm
an-
agem
ent
do
esn
oth
ing
toen
sure
that
emp
loye
eskn
ow
thei
rre
spo
nsi
bili
ties
.W
hen
du
rin
gth
eau
dit
the
Au
dit
or
has
evid
ence
that
key
emp
loye
esar
en
ot
awar
eo
fth
eir
resp
on
sib
iliti
esan
dth
isle
ads
toa
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
and
/or
leg
alit
yis
sue.
1.2.
5E
mp
loye
esw
ith
infl
uen
ceo
np
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tssh
allb
eaw
are
of
thei
rre
spo
nsi
bili
ties
,an
dsh
allb
eab
leto
dem
on
stra
teth
eir
un
der
stan
din
go
fth
eir
resp
on
sib
iliti
es.
5.0
Key
per
son
nel
and
resp
on
sib
iliti
esw
illb
eid
enti
fied
inth
ew
ritt
enp
rog
ram
.
–<i
nte
rvie
wo
fat
leas
t:Q
SM
D,p
erso
nre
spo
nsi
ble
for
lab
elin
g/p
rin
tin
g,p
erso
nre
spo
nsi
ble
for
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
t,p
erso
nre
spo
nsi
ble
for
pro
du
ctio
n,
per
son
resp
on
sib
lefo
rm
on
ito
rin
gC
P’s
>
Key
emp
loye
esar
en
ot
awar
eo
fth
eir
resp
on
sib
iliti
es.
1.2.
6T
he
com
pan
ysh
allh
ave
anIF
SPA
Cse
cure
rep
rese
nta
tive
no
min
ated
by
sen
ior
man
agem
ent.
–W
ho
isth
eIF
SPA
Cse
cure
rep
rese
nta
tive
?–
Wh
atar
eth
ere
spo
nsi
bili
ties
of
the
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
pre
sen
tati
ve?
–Is
the
fun
ctio
no
fth
eIF
SPA
Cse
cure
rep
rese
nta
tive
clea
rly
laid
do
wn
?–
<jo
bd
escr
ipti
on
>,<o
rgan
izat
ion
char
t>
No
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
pre
sen
tati
veex
ists
.
1.2.
7T
he
sen
ior
man
agem
ent
shal
lp
rovi
de
suffi
cien
tan
dre
leva
nt
reso
urc
esto
mee
tth
ep
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
ts.
–H
ow
wer
eth
en
eces
sary
reso
urc
esd
efin
ed?
–<b
ud
get
pla
n>
Wh
ense
nio
rm
an-
agem
ent
do
esn
’tp
rovi
de
eno
ug
hre
sou
rces
and
this
lead
sto
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yan
d/o
rle
gal
ity
issu
e.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 49
1.2.
8T
he
dep
artm
ent
resp
on
sib
lefo
rq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
man
agem
ent
shal
lhav
ea
dir
ect
rep
ort
ing
rela
tio
nsh
ipto
the
sen
ior
man
agem
ent.
–W
ho
isth
eQ
Sm
anag
er?
–To
wh
om
do
esth
eQ
Sm
anag
erre
po
rt?
–<j
ob
des
crip
tio
n>,
<org
aniz
atio
nch
art>
1.2.
9T
he
com
pan
ysh
alle
nsu
reth
atal
lp
roce
sses
(do
cum
ente
dan
du
nd
ocu
-m
ente
d)
are
kno
wn
by
the
rele
van
tp
erso
nn
elan
dar
eap
plie
dco
nsi
st-
entl
y.
–W
hat
crit
eria
are
use
dto
ensu
rep
roce
ssco
ntr
ol?
–W
hat
isd
on
eto
ensu
reth
atp
roce
sses
are
kno
wn
tore
leva
nt
per
son
nel
(in
cl.
per
man
ent
staf
fan
dte
mp
ora
ry/s
easo
nal
wo
rker
s)?
Pro
cess
esca
nb
eu
nd
erst
oo
das
ISO
pro
cess
es(s
eeal
soch
apte
r2.
3,P
art
1o
fth
est
and
ard
)
Wh
enke
yp
erso
nn
elh
ave
no
pro
cess
kno
wle
dg
ean
dth
isle
ads
toa
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
/or
leg
alit
yis
sue.
1.2.
10T
he
com
pan
ysh
allh
ave
asy
stem
inp
lace
toen
sure
that
itis
kep
tin
form
edo
fal
lrel
evan
tle
gis
lati
on
on
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
qu
alit
yis
sues
,sci
enti
fic
and
tech
ni-
cald
evel
op
men
tsan
din
du
stry
cod
eso
fp
ract
ice.
–H
ow
do
esm
anag
emen
ten
sure
that
all
rele
van
tp
acka
gin
gsa
fety
law
sar
ein
pla
cean
dkn
ow
n?
–H
ow
do
esm
anag
emen
ten
sure
that
pu
rch
ased
pro
du
cts
com
ply
wit
hal
lre
leva
nt
leg
isla
tio
n?
–H
ow
do
esm
anag
emen
ten
sure
that
man
ufa
ctu
red
pro
du
cts
com
ply
wit
hal
lre
leva
nt
leg
isla
tio
n?
–<p
acka
gin
gm
ater
iall
aws
sub
scri
pti
on
>,<t
rain
ing
>
Wh
enab
sen
ceo
fle
gal
kno
wle
dg
ean
din
form
atio
no
nre
leva
nt
law
sle
adto
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
safe
tyan
d/o
rle
gal
ity
issu
e.
1.2.
11T
he
com
pan
ysh
alli
nfo
rmit
scu
sto
m-
ers,
asso
on
asp
oss
ible
,of
any
issu
ere
late
dto
pro
du
ctsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
inp
arti
cula
ro
fal
lno
n-c
on
form
ity(
ies)
iden
tifi
edb
yco
mp
eten
tau
tho
riti
esre
late
dto
pro
du
cts
wh
ich
cou
ldh
ave,
has
or
has
had
ad
efin
edim
pac
to
nsa
fety
and
/or
leg
alit
yo
fre
spec
tive
pro
du
cts.
Th
isco
uld
incl
ud
e,b
ut
are
no
tlim
ited
toca
uti
on
ary
issu
es.
For
exam
ple
,if
reg
ula
tory
bo
die
sco
me
toth
eco
mp
any
and
iden
tify
that
som
eth
ing
isw
ron
g(r
elat
edto
leg
alit
y/q
ual
ity
/saf
ety)
on
ap
riva
tela
bel
pro
du
ct,t
he
com
pan
ysh
all
info
rmth
ere
leva
nt
cust
om
erac
cord
ing
ly.I
fth
isp
rod
uct
isal
som
anu
fact
ure
dfo
ro
ther
cust
om
ers
and
ifth
eid
enti
fied
dev
iati
on
/n
on
-co
nfo
rmit
yal
soh
asan
imp
act
on
the
oth
erp
riva
tela
bel
s,th
eco
mp
any
shal
lals
oin
form
thes
eo
ther
rele
van
tcu
sto
mer
s.
1.3
Cu
sto
mer
focu
s
1.3.
1A
do
cum
ente
dp
roce
du
resh
allb
ein
pla
ceto
iden
tify
fun
dam
enta
lnee
ds
and
exp
ecta
tio
ns
of
cust
om
ers.
–H
ow
are
cust
om
ern
eed
san
dex
pec
ta-
tio
ns
iden
tifi
ed?
–H
ow
oft
enar
eth
ese
iden
tifi
ed?
<qu
esti
on
nai
re/s
urv
eyre
gar
din
gcu
s-to
mer
nee
ds
and
exp
ecta
tio
ns>
© IFS, October 2012
50 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
1.3.
2T
he
resu
lts
of
this
pro
ced
ure
shal
lbe
eval
uat
edan
dco
nsi
der
edto
det
er-
min
eq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
ob
ject
ives
.
–W
hat
wer
eth
ere
sult
so
fth
ela
stcu
s-to
mer
surv
ey?
<an
alys
iso
fcu
sto
mer
surv
eys>
–H
ow
thes
ere
sult
sw
ere
eval
uat
edre
gar
din
gq
ual
ity
ob
ject
ives
?<q
ual
ity
ob
ject
ives
>–
Hav
eid
enti
fied
nee
ds
infl
uen
ceo
nth
ep
rod
uct
ion
pro
cess
?<s
urv
eyan
alys
es>
1.4
Man
agem
ent
revi
ew
1.4.
1S
enio
rm
anag
emen
tsh
alle
nsu
reth
atth
eq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
man
agem
ent
sys-
tem
sar
ere
view
edat
leas
tan
nu
ally
or
mo
refr
equ
entl
yif
chan
ges
occ
ur.
Su
chre
view
ssh
allc
on
tain
,at
leas
t,re
sult
so
fau
dit
s,cu
sto
mer
feed
-b
acks
,pro
cess
com
plia
nce
and
pro
du
ctco
nfo
rmit
y,st
atu
so
fp
reve
nti
vean
dco
rrec
tive
acti
on
s,fo
llow
up
acti
on
sfr
om
pre
vio
us
man
agem
ent
revi
ews,
chan
ges
that
cou
ldaf
fect
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
and
qu
alit
ym
anag
emen
tsy
stem
san
dre
com
men
dat
ion
sfo
rim
pro
vem
ent.
6.1
6.6
Man
agem
ent
will
det
erm
ine
the
inte
rnal
acti
viti
esre
qu
ired
toen
sure
the
req
uir
emen
tso
fth
isst
and
ard
are
met
.
Th
efo
od
safe
typ
ro-
gra
msh
allb
ere
view
edat
leas
to
nce
per
year
toas
sess
ifit
is:
–C
urr
ent.
Th
atis
,it
refl
ects
fact
ors
incl
ud
ing
,bu
tn
ot
limit
edto
:·
Ap
plic
able
stan
d-
ard
s.·
Op
erat
ion
al/P
roce
ss/
Mat
eria
lch
ang
es.
·O
rgan
izat
ion
chan
ges
.·
Sci
enti
fic
dev
elo
p-
men
ts.
–Im
ple
men
ted
.–
Mai
nta
ined
.
Res
ult
so
fth
ere
-ass
ess-
men
tar
eu
sed
tou
pd
ate,
mai
nta
ino
rim
pro
veth
efo
od
safe
tysy
stem
.
–W
hen
isth
eq
ual
ity
and
safe
tym
anag
e-m
ent
syst
emre
view
edan
dev
alu
ated
?–
Ho
wo
ften
was
the
syst
emre
view
edla
stye
ar?
–W
hat
was
the
resu
lto
fth
ere
view
?<r
evie
wre
po
rt>
–D
oes
the
man
agem
ent
revi
ewta
kein
toco
nsi
der
atio
n,a
sa
min
imu
m,t
he
asse
ss-
men
to
fth
efo
llow
ing
:·
do
cum
ents
fro
mth
ep
revi
ou
sm
anag
e-m
ent
revi
ew,
·re
sult
sfr
om
inte
rnal
and
exte
rnal
aud
its,
asw
ella
sin
spec
tio
ns,
·p
erfo
rman
cein
dic
ato
rsfo
rcu
sto
mer
s,co
mp
lain
tsan
dw
ith
dra
wal
s/re
calls
,·
inci
den
ts,c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns,
resu
lts
ou
to
fsp
ecifi
cati
on
san
dn
on
-co
nfo
rmin
gm
ater
ials
,·
pro
cess
per
form
ance
and
pro
du
ctco
mp
lian
ce,
·re
view
of
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tsy
stem
and
chan
ges
whi
chm
ayaf
fect
qua-
lity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
syst
em,
·ev
olu
tio
ns
of
scie
nti
fic
info
rmat
ion
rela
ted
top
rod
uct
s,·
imp
rove
men
to
fq
ual
ity
syst
emef
fici
ency
and
pro
du
ctio
np
roce
ss,
·im
pro
vem
ent
of
pro
du
ct,r
elat
edto
cust
om
erre
qu
irem
ents
,·
need
sin
reso
urce
s(in
clud
ing
inve
stm
ents
)?
Wh
enth
eq
ual
ity
man
agem
ent
syst
emis
no
tre
view
edre
gu
larl
yan
dth
ere
isn
oas
sura
nce
that
itw
ork
sp
rop
erly
.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 51
1.4.
2T
his
revi
ewsh
alli
ncl
ud
eth
eev
alu
a-ti
on
of
mea
sure
sfo
rth
eco
ntr
olo
fth
eq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
man
agem
ent
syst
eman
dfo
rth
eco
nti
nu
ou
sim
pro
vem
ent
pro
cess
.
6.1
Th
efr
equ
enci
eso
fco
mp
leti
ng
acti
viti
esw
illb
ees
tab
lish
edan
dw
illen
sure
the
effe
ctiv
eim
ple
men
tati
on
and
mai
nte
nan
ceo
fth
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
safe
tysy
stem
.
Bas
edo
nth
ere
view
resu
lt,h
ave
any
acti
on
sfo
rim
pro
vem
ent
bee
nta
ken
?<i
mp
rove
men
tac
tio
ns>
1.4.
3T
he
com
pan
ysh
alli
den
tify
and
revi
ewre
gu
larl
y(e
.g.b
yin
tern
alau
dit
so
ro
n-s
ite
insp
ecti
on
)th
ein
fras
tru
ctu
ren
eed
edto
ach
ieve
con
form
ity
top
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
ts.
Th
issh
alli
ncl
ud
e,as
am
inim
um
,th
efo
llow
ing
:–
bu
ildin
gs
–su
pp
lysy
stem
s–
mac
hin
esan
deq
uip
men
t–
tran
spo
rt.
Th
ere
sult
so
fth
ere
view
shal
lbe
con
sid
ered
,wit
hd
ue
con
sid
erat
ion
tori
sk,f
or
inve
stm
ent
pla
nn
ing
.
–W
hen
isin
fras
tru
ctu
re(b
uild
ing
,mac
hin
-er
y,tr
ansp
ort
)ev
alu
ated
?–
Wh
atw
asth
ere
sult
of
infr
astr
uct
ure
eval
uat
ion
?<a
ud
itre
po
rt>
–W
ho
eval
uat
edin
fras
tru
ctu
re?
–W
hat
wer
eth
ere
sult
so
fth
ein
fra-
stru
ctu
reas
sess
men
t?<c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
<in
vest
men
tp
lan
>–
Wer
eth
ere
sult
su
sed
for
furt
her
infr
a-st
ruct
ure
pla
nn
ing
?<i
nve
stm
ent
pla
n>
–W
hat
risk
sw
ere
iden
tifi
edac
cord
ing
toth
ere
sult
so
fin
fras
tru
ctu
reas
sess
men
t?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–W
hata
rein
fras
truc
ture
rela
ted
inve
stm
ents
for
the
nea
rfu
ture
?<i
nve
stm
ent
pla
n>
Wh
enin
fras
tru
ctu
reis
no
tev
alu
ated
and
ther
efo
rea
risk
for
leg
alit
y,sa
fety
and
qu
alit
yo
fp
rod
uct
so
ccu
rs.
1.4.
4T
he
com
pan
ysh
alli
den
tify
and
revi
ewre
gu
larl
y(e
.g.b
yin
tern
alau
dit
so
ro
n-s
ite
insp
ecti
on
)th
ew
ork
envi
ron
men
tn
eed
edto
ach
ieve
con
form
ity
top
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
ts.
Th
issh
alli
ncl
ud
e,as
am
inim
um
the
follo
win
g:
–st
aff
faci
litie
s–
envi
ron
men
talc
on
dit
ion
s–
hyg
ien
icco
nd
itio
ns
–w
ork
pla
ced
esig
n–
exte
rnal
infl
uen
ces
(e.g
.no
ise,
vib
rati
on
).T
he
resu
lts
of
the
revi
ewsh
allb
eco
nsi
der
ed,w
ith
du
eco
nsi
der
atio
nto
risk
for
inve
stm
ent
pla
nn
ing
.
–W
hen
isth
ew
ork
envi
ron
men
t(s
taff
faci
li-ti
es,e
nvi
ron
men
talc
on
dit
ion
s,sa
fety
and
secu
rity
atw
ork
,hyg
ien
icco
nd
itio
ns,
wo
rkp
lace
des
ign
etc.
)ev
alu
ated
?–
Wh
atw
asth
ere
sult
of
wo
rken
viro
nm
ent
eval
uat
ion
?<a
ud
itre
po
rt>
–W
ho
eval
uat
edw
ork
envi
ron
men
t?–
Wh
atw
ere
the
resu
lts
of
the
wo
rken
viro
nm
ent
asse
ssm
ent?
<co
rrec
tive
acti
on
s><i
nve
stm
ent
pla
n>
–W
ere
the
resu
lts
use
dfo
rfu
rth
erw
ork
envi
ron
men
tp
lan
nin
g?
<in
vest
men
tp
lan
>–
Wh
atri
sks
wer
eid
enti
fied
acco
rdin
gto
the
resu
lts
of
the
wo
rken
viro
nm
ent
asse
ssm
ent?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>–
Wh
atar
ew
ork
envi
ron
men
tre
late
din
vest
men
tsfo
rth
en
ear
futu
re?
<in
vest
men
tp
lan
>
Wh
enw
ork
envi
ron
-m
ent
isn
ot
eval
uat
edan
dth
eref
ore
ari
skfo
rle
gal
ity,
safe
tyan
dq
ual
ity
of
pro
du
cts
occ
urs
.
© IFS, October 2012
52 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
2Q
ual
ity
and
Pac
kag
ing
Mat
eria
lS
afet
yM
anag
emen
tS
yste
m
2.1
Qu
alit
ym
anag
emen
t
2.1.
1D
ocu
men
tati
on
req
uir
emen
ts4.
1C
on
tro
lof
Do
cum
ents
Do
cum
ents
are
crea
ted
and
mai
nta
ined
toen
-su
reth
eef
fect
ive
dev
el-
op
men
t,im
ple
men
ta-
tio
n,m
ain
ten
ance
and
imp
rove
men
to
fth
efo
od
safe
tysy
stem
.A
do
cum
ent
con
tro
lp
roce
du
reis
esta
blis
hed
that
will
defi
ne
ho
wd
ocu
men
tsar
e:–
Ap
pro
ved
.–
Rev
iew
ed,r
evis
edan
du
pd
ated
.–
Rem
ain
leg
ible
and
easi
lyid
enti
fiab
le.
–Id
enti
fied
,in
clu
din
gcu
rren
tst
atu
s(e
.g.
revi
sio
nle
vel)
.–
Mai
nta
ined
socu
rren
tve
rsio
ns
are
avai
lab
lefo
ru
sean
du
nin
ten
d-
edu
seis
pre
ven
ted
.E
ach
pre
req
uis
ite
pro
-g
ram
req
uir
esp
rop
erdo
cum
enta
tion
ofth
epr
o-g
ram
elem
ents
and
sup
-p
ort
ing
info
rmat
ion
in-
clud
ing,
butn
otlim
ited
to:
–S
tan
dar
do
per
atin
gp
roce
du
res.
–Fo
rms.
–C
hec
klis
ts.
–C
orr
ecti
veA
ctio
nR
epo
rts.
–Fo
od
Saf
ety
Pro
gra
mR
eass
essm
ent.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 53
2.1.
1.1
Th
esy
stem
of
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
and
qu
alit
ym
anag
emen
tsh
all
be
do
cum
ente
dan
dim
ple
men
ted
,an
dsh
allb
ere
tain
edin
on
elo
cati
on
(pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
qu
alit
ym
anu
alo
rel
ectr
on
icd
ocu
-m
ente
dsy
stem
).
4.1
–W
her
eis
do
cum
enta
tio
nco
nce
rnin
gth
eq
ual
ity
syst
emfo
rq
ual
ity
assu
ran
cean
dp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yre
tain
ed?
<pro
ced
ure
for
do
cum
ent
con
tro
l>
Wh
enth
ere
isn
oq
ual
ity
syst
emfo
rq
ual
ity
assu
ran
cean
dp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
safe
tyin
pla
ce.
2.1.
1.2
Ad
ocu
men
ted
pro
ced
ure
shal
lexi
stfo
rth
eco
ntr
olo
fd
ocu
men
tsan
dth
eir
amen
dm
ents
.
4.1
–W
hat
rule
sex
ist
reg
ard
ing
do
cum
ent
con
tro
l?–
Do
the
do
cum
ents
hav
ean
iden
tifi
cati
on
cod
e?–
Ho
wis
the
iden
tifi
cati
on
cod
est
ruct
ure
d?
–H
ow
can
are
visi
on
be
iden
tifi
ed?
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
chan
ges
<pro
ced
ure
for
do
cum
ents
>
Wh
end
ocu
men
tsd
on
ot
stat
ecl
earl
yw
hic
hex
ist,
are
inu
sean
dva
lid.
2.1.
1.3
All
do
cum
ents
shal
lbe
clea
rly
leg
ible
,un
amb
igu
ou
san
dco
mp
re-
hen
sive
.Th
eysh
allb
eav
aila
ble
tore
leva
nt
per
son
nel
atal
ltim
es.
4.1
–A
real
ldo
cum
ents
leg
ible
?–
Are
the
do
cum
ents
un
amb
igu
ou
s?–
Are
the
do
cum
ents
avai
lab
leat
the
rig
ht
pla
ces?
Als
oaf
ter
offi
ceh
ou
rs?
–H
ow
do
rele
van
tem
plo
yees
hav
eac
cess
tod
ocu
men
ts?
–H
ow
are
do
cum
ent
chan
ges
com
mu
ni-
cate
dto
rele
van
tem
plo
yees
?–
Are
ther
ean
yd
istr
ibu
tio
nlis
tsfo
rd
ocu
men
ts?
<exa
mp
les>
,<p
roce
du
re>,
<dis
trib
uti
on
lists
>
Wh
end
ocu
men
tsar
eu
nav
aila
ble
and
this
end
ang
ers
leg
alit
y,sa
fety
or
qu
alit
yo
fth
ep
rod
uct
.
2.1.
1.4
All
do
cum
ents
wh
ich
are
nec
essa
ryfo
rco
mp
lian
cew
ith
the
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
shal
lbe
avai
lab
lein
thei
rla
test
vers
ion
.
4.1
–H
ow
isd
ocu
men
tva
lidit
yid
enti
fied
?–
Ho
wis
iten
sure
dth
ato
nly
valid
do
cu-
men
tsar
ein
circ
ula
tio
n?
Wh
envo
id/o
bso
lete
or
ou
t-o
fd
ate
do
cu-
men
tsar
en
ot
iden
ti-
fied
assu
chan
dth
us
end
ang
erle
gal
ity,
safe
tyo
rq
ual
ity.
2.1.
1.5
Th
ere
aso
nfo
ran
yam
end
men
tsto
do
cum
ents
crit
ical
for
the
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
shal
lbe
reco
rded
.
4.1
–A
reth
ere
aso
ns
for
any
amen
dm
ents
tod
ocu
men
ts,c
riti
calf
or
the
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
reco
rded
?<e
xam
ple
s>
2.1.
2R
eco
rdke
epin
g
2.1.
2.1
All
rele
van
tre
cord
sn
eces
sary
for
the
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
shal
lbe
com
ple
te,d
etai
led
and
mai
nta
ined
and
shal
lbe
avai
lab
leo
nre
qu
est.
4.2
Rec
ord
sar
ees
tab
lish
edto
pro
vid
eo
bje
ctiv
eev
i-d
ence
of
con
form
ity
toth
ere
qu
irem
ents
of
the
foo
dsa
fety
pro
gra
m.
–W
hat
reco
rds
exis
t?–
Are
the
reco
rds
com
ple
te?
–A
reth
ere
cord
sav
aila
ble
?
Wh
enin
suffi
cien
to
rn
ore
cord
sar
em
ade
and
thu
sen
dan
ger
leg
alit
y,sa
fety
or
qu
alit
y.
© IFS, October 2012
54 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
2.1.
2.2
Rec
ord
ssh
allb
ele
gib
lean
dg
enu
-in
e.T
hey
shal
lbe
mai
nta
ined
ina
way
that
sub
seq
uen
tm
anip
ula
tio
no
fre
cord
sis
pro
hib
ited
.
4.2
Ap
roce
du
reis
esta
b-
lish
edth
atw
illd
efin
eh
ow
foo
dsa
fety
rela
ted
reco
rds
are
mai
nta
ined
soth
atth
eyar
e:–
Leg
ible
.–
Rea
dily
iden
tifi
able
and
retr
ieva
ble
.–
Au
dit
able
.–
Pro
tect
edan
dst
ore
dto
pre
ven
td
amag
eo
rd
eter
iora
tio
n.
–S
tore
dfo
ran
app
ro-
pri
ate
rete
nti
on
per
iod
.–
Pro
per
lyd
isp
ose
d.
Rec
ord
sin
clu
de,
bu
tar
en
ot
limit
edto
,co
mp
lete
d:
–Fo
rms.
–C
hec
klis
ts.
–S
ervi
ceA
gre
emen
tsan
dC
on
trac
ts.
–C
orr
ecti
veA
ctio
nR
epo
rts.
–Fo
od
Saf
ety
Pro
gra
mR
eass
essm
ent.
–A
rere
cord
sp
lau
sib
le?
–A
rere
cord
sle
gib
le?
–W
hat
kin
do
fas
sura
nce
isg
iven
that
reco
rds
can
no
tb
esu
bse
qu
entl
ym
anip
u-
late
d?
–A
reth
ere
cord
sre
view
edb
ya
sup
ervi
-so
r?
Wh
enre
cord
sar
eill
egib
lean
dth
eref
ore
no
evid
ence
exis
tsfo
rle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
chec
ks/i
nsp
ecti
on
s.
2.1.
2.3
All
reco
rds
shal
lbe
kep
tin
acco
rd-
ance
wit
hle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsan
dfo
ra
min
imu
mo
fo
ne
year
afte
rth
ere
com
men
ded
con
vert
ing
tim
e.Fo
rp
rod
uct
sw
hic
hh
ave
no
reco
m-
men
ded
con
vert
ing
tim
e,th
ed
ura
tio
no
fre
cord
keep
ing
shal
lbe
just
ified
and
this
just
ifica
tio
nsh
allb
ed
ocu
men
ted
.
4.2
–W
her
ear
ere
cord
sst
ore
d?
–W
ho
sto
res
reco
rds?
–H
ow
lon
gar
ere
cord
ske
pt?
On
wh
atb
asis
wer
ere
cord
sto
rag
eti
mes
defi
ned
?–
For
pro
du
cts
wit
ha
sho
rtre
com
men
ded
con
vert
ing
tim
e,w
asre
cord
sto
rag
eti
me
defi
nit
ion
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
is?
Ifa
reco
mm
end
edco
nve
rtin
gti
me
isd
efin
ed,c
orr
esp
on
din
gre
cord
ssh
allb
eav
aila
ble
atle
ast
un
tilt
hat
dat
e.<p
roce
-d
ure
do
cum
ents
>,<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
Wh
enre
cord
sar
en
ot
sto
red
inac
cord
ance
tole
gal
req
uir
emen
ts.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 55
2.1.
2.4
An
yam
end
men
tsto
reco
rds
shal
lo
nly
be
carr
ied
ou
tb
yau
tho
rize
dp
erso
ns.
4.1
–H
ow
are
amen
dm
ents
tore
cord
sca
rrie
do
ut?
–W
ho
isau
tho
rize
dto
mak
eam
end
men
ts?
–H
ow
are
amen
dm
ents
auth
ori
zed
?
Wh
ena
gen
eral
pro
ble
mex
ists
reg
ard
ing
reco
rdch
ang
es/a
men
d-
men
tsin
the
com
-p
any.
2.1.
2.5
Rec
ord
ssh
allb
ese
cure
lyst
ore
dan
dea
sily
acce
ssib
le.
–W
hat
isth
ep
roce
ssin
pla
ceto
mak
ed
ocu
men
tsan
dd
ata
avai
lab
lean
dre
adab
le?
<bac
kup
syst
em>,
<sto
rag
eco
nd
itio
n>
2.2
Pac
kag
ing
Mat
eria
lSaf
ety
Man
age-
men
t
2.2.
1H
azar
dan
alys
isan
dri
skas
sess
men
tsy
stem
See
gen
eric
HA
CC
Pm
od
els
PAC
secu
re
2.2.
1.1
Th
eb
asis
of
the
com
pan
y’s
pac
kag
-in
gm
ater
ials
afet
yco
ntr
ols
yste
msh
allb
ea
fully
imp
lem
ente
d,
syst
emat
ican
dco
mp
reh
ensi
veh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
-m
ent
syst
em,b
ased
up
on
the
Co
dex
Alim
enta
riu
sp
rin
cip
les
or
on
ind
ust
ryg
uid
elin
es.I
tsh
allt
ake
into
acco
un
tan
yle
gal
req
uir
emen
tso
fth
ep
rod
uct
ion
and
des
tin
atio
nco
un
trie
sw
hic
hm
ayg
ob
eyo
nd
such
pri
nci
ple
s.T
he
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
/or
risk
asse
ssm
ent
syst
emsh
all
be
imp
lem
ente
dat
each
pro
du
ctio
nsi
te.
–T
he
com
pan
y’s
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
isb
ased
on
wh
atp
rin
cip
les?
–H
asev
ery
site
/pla
nt
ase
par
ate
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
?–
Wh
ich
spec
ific
reg
ula
tio
ns
are
take
nca
reo
fin
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
?<
haz
ard
anal
ysis
pla
n>
–ar
eth
ele
gal
req
uir
emen
tso
fth
ed
esti
na-
tio
nco
un
try
are
kno
wn
,esp
ecia
llyth
ela
bel
ing
reg
ula
tio
n?
Ifth
ere
isn
oh
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ss-
men
tp
lan
.If
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
are
no
tin
clu
ded
inh
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
pla
nIf
ther
eis
no
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
-m
ent
pla
nfo
rea
chin
div
idu
alsi
te/p
lan
t.
2.2.
1.2
Th
eh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
tsy
stem
shal
lco
ver
all
raw
mat
eria
ls,p
rod
uct
so
rp
rod
uct
gro
up
sas
wel
las
ever
yp
roce
ssfr
om
go
od
sin
tod
isp
atch
,in
clu
din
gp
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
pro
du
ctp
acka
gin
g.
–D
oes
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
cove
ral
lpro
du
ctg
rou
ps
and
pro
cess
esin
cl.p
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
pro
du
ctw
rap
pin
gm
ater
ial?
–W
hic
hp
roce
sses
are
per
form
ed?
<pro
du
ctg
rou
po
verv
iew
>,<fl
ow
char
t>
Wh
enth
eh
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ss-
men
tp
lan
do
esn
ot
cove
ral
lpro
du
ctg
rou
ps
and
pro
-ce
sses
.
© IFS, October 2012
56 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
2.2.
1.3
Th
eco
mp
any
shal
len
sure
that
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
/or
risk
asse
ss-
men
tsy
stem
isb
ased
up
on
scie
nti
fic
liter
atu
re,o
rte
chn
ical
veri
fied
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns
rela
tin
gto
the
man
ufa
ctu
red
pro
du
cts
and
pro
ced
ure
s.T
his
shal
lbe
mai
nta
ined
inlin
ew
ith
new
tech
nic
alp
roce
ssd
evel
op
men
t.
–Is
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
bas
edu
po
nsc
ien
tifi
clit
erat
ure
or
tech
ni-
cally
veri
fied
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns
rela
tin
gto
the
man
ufa
ctu
red
pro
du
cts
and
pro
ced
ure
s?–
Ho
war
en
ewte
chn
ical
dev
elo
pm
ents
take
nca
reo
f?<r
efer
ence
so
fu
sed
liter
atu
re,e
tc.>
–D
oes
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tsy
stem
mee
tal
lap
plic
able
reg
ula
tory
req
uir
emen
tso
fth
eco
un
try
inw
hic
hit
ises
tab
lish
ed,i
ncl
ud
ing
the
req
uir
edan
dap
plic
able
risk
asse
ssm
ents
and
sup
po
rt-
ing
do
cum
enta
tio
n?
(Wh
ere
app
licab
le,s
uch
reg
ula
tory
req
uir
e-m
ents
will
sup
erce
de
req
uir
emen
tso
fth
est
and
ard
.Rel
ated
toC
anad
ian
and
US
law
,ce
rtai
nfo
rms
and
form
ats
are
req
uir
ed.)
Wh
enh
azar
dan
aly-
sis/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
pla
nis
no
tb
ased
on
scie
nti
fic
liter
atu
reo
rte
chn
ical
lyve
rifi
edd
ata
abo
ut
pro
du
cts
and
pro
cess
esan
dth
eref
ore
cau
ses
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
safe
tyo
rle
gal
ity
risk
.
2.2.
1.4
Th
eh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
tsy
stem
shal
lbe
revi
ewed
and
nec
essa
rych
ang
essh
allb
em
ade
wh
enan
ym
od
ifica
tio
nis
mad
ein
the
pro
du
ct,p
roce
sso
ran
yst
ep.
Ho
war
ep
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent/
pro
du
ctm
od
ifica
tio
nan
dh
azar
dan
alys
isin
terc
on
-n
ecte
d?
2.2.
2H
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
-m
ent
team
2.2.
2.1
Ass
emb
leh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
tte
amT
he
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
/or
risk
asse
ssm
ent
team
shal
lbe
mu
ltid
isci
-p
linar
yan
din
clu
de
op
erat
ion
alst
aff.
Per
son
nel
app
oin
ted
ash
azar
dan
aly-
sis
and
/or
risk
asse
ssm
ent
team
mem
ber
ssh
allh
ave
spec
ific
kno
wl-
edg
eo
fh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
t,p
rod
uct
and
pro
cess
kno
wle
dg
ean
dth
eas
soci
ated
haz
ard
s.W
her
eco
mp
eten
tkn
ow
l-ed
ge
isn
ot
avai
lab
le,e
xter
nal
exp
ert
advi
cesh
allb
eo
bta
ined
.
–W
ho
ism
emb
ero
fth
eh
azar
dan
alys
is/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
team
?–
Wh
ich
dep
artm
ents
/fu
nct
ion
sar
ein
clu
ded
inth
eh
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
team
?–
Ho
ww
asq
ual
ifica
tio
nfo
rh
azar
dan
aly-
sis/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
team
mem
ber
ship
veri
fied
?<e
vid
ence
sfo
red
uca
tio
n,
adva
nce
dtr
ain
ing
>–
Wh
ath
azar
ds
are
con
nec
ted
toth
ep
rod
uct
?–
Do
esa
con
trac
tex
ist
wit
han
exte
rnal
exp
ert?
<ser
vice
con
trac
t>
Alt
ho
ug
hth
ere
isa
lack
of
pro
du
ctkn
ow
led
ge
no
exte
rnal
exp
ert
has
bee
nco
nsu
lted
and
this
resu
lts
inp
acka
g-
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
leg
alit
yri
sk.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 57
2.2.
2.2
Th
ose
resp
on
sib
lefo
rth
ed
evel
op
-m
ent
and
mai
nte
nan
ceo
fth
eh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
tsy
stem
shal
lhav
ean
inte
rnal
team
lead
eran
dsh
allh
ave
rece
ived
adeq
uat
etr
ain
ing
inth
eap
plic
atio
no
fth
eh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
tp
rin
cip
les.
–W
hat
isth
eco
nte
nt
of
ah
azar
dan
aly-
sis/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
trai
nin
gco
urs
e?<h
azar
dan
alys
istr
ain
ing
pro
ofs
>–
Wh
enw
asth
ela
sth
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
trai
nin
gco
urs
eh
eld
?<t
rain
ing
evid
ence
s>–
Wh
op
arti
cip
ated
inth
eh
azar
dan
aly-
sis/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
trai
nin
gco
urs
e?<t
rain
ing
evid
ence
s>
2.2.
2.3
Th
eh
azar
dan
alys
isan
d/o
rri
skas
sess
men
tte
amsh
allh
ave
stro
ng
sen
ior
man
agem
ent
sup
po
rtan
dsh
allb
ew
ellk
no
wn
and
esta
blis
hed
acro
ssth
ew
ho
lefa
cilit
y.
–W
ho
ism
emb
ero
fth
eh
azar
dan
aly-
sis/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
team
?–
Isth
ete
amw
ellk
no
wn
acro
ssth
eco
mp
any?
Ho
ww
asit
ann
ou
nce
d?
<jo
bd
escr
ipti
on
s>,<
team
mat
rix>
,<b
lack
bo
ard
no
tice
>,<p
rese
nce
of
man
agem
ent
inan
yh
azar
dan
alys
isb
rief
>,<r
esu
lto
fh
azar
dan
alys
isre
wie
win
clu
de
inM
anag
emen
tre
view
>,<a
ttri
bu
tio
no
fre
sou
rces
>
Wh
enn
oh
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ss-
men
tte
amex
ists
or
no
per
son
has
bee
nap
po
inte
dh
azar
dan
alys
iste
amle
ader
.
2.2.
3H
azar
dan
alys
isan
dri
skas
sess
men
tS
eeg
ene-
ric
HA
CC
Pm
od
els
PAC
secu
re
2.2.
3.1
Des
crib
ep
rod
uct
Th
eas
sess
men
tsh
allm
ake
refe
r-en
ceto
the
full
des
crip
tio
no
fth
ep
rod
uct
incl
ud
ing
alla
pp
licab
lere
leva
nt
info
rmat
ion
on
pro
du
ctsa
fety
such
as:
–co
mp
osi
tio
n(r
awm
ater
ials
,re
wo
rk,r
epro
cess
ing
,rec
ycle
dw
aste
etc.
),–
ph
ysic
al,c
hem
ical
and
mic
rob
io-
log
ical
par
amet
ers,
–m
eth
od
so
ftr
eatm
ent,
–w
rap
pin
g,l
abel
ing
,–
du
rab
ility
(sh
elf
life)
,–
con
dit
ion
sfo
rst
ora
ge
and
met
ho
do
ftr
ansp
ort
.
Form
1–
Do
esa
com
ple
tep
rod
uct
des
crip
tio
nex
ist
for
each
pro
du
ct?
–W
hat
isin
clu
ded
inth
ep
rod
uct
des
crip
-ti
on
?<p
rod
uct
des
crip
tio
n>
<pro
du
ctsp
ecifi
cati
on
>
Wh
enth
ere
are
no
pro
du
ctd
escr
ipti
on
sfo
rea
chp
rod
uct
.W
hen
pro
du
ctd
escr
ipti
on
sd
on
ot
pro
vid
ees
sen
tial
pro
du
ctd
ata.
Wh
enes
sen
tial
info
rmat
ion
do
esn
ot
mat
chle
gis
lati
on
(e.g
.m
igra
tio
nte
stva
lues
).
© IFS, October 2012
58 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
2.2.
3.2
Iden
tify
inte
nd
edu
seT
he
inte
nd
edu
seo
fth
ep
rod
uct
shal
lb
ed
escr
ibed
inre
lati
on
toth
eex
pec
ted
use
of
the
pro
du
ctb
yth
eco
nsu
mer
,tak
ing
into
acco
un
tvu
lner
able
gro
up
so
fco
nsu
mer
s.
Form
1–
Wh
atis
the
inte
nd
edu
seo
fth
ep
rod
uct
by
cust
om
er?
–W
hat
isth
ein
ten
ded
use
of
the
pro
du
ctb
yfi
nal
con
sum
er?
–A
reth
ere
any
rest
rict
ion
sfo
ru
sag
e?<p
rod
uct
des
crip
tio
n>
Wh
enth
ere
isa
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
risk
for
con
-su
mer
sd
ue
tola
cko
fd
efin
itio
nfo
ru
sag
e.
2.2.
3.3
Co
nst
ruct
flo
wd
iag
ram
Ap
roce
ssfl
ow
dia
gra
msh
allb
eev
alu
ated
agai
nst
each
pro
du
ct,o
rp
rod
uct
gro
up
,an
dfo
ral
lvar
iati
on
so
fth
ep
roce
sses
and
sub
-pro
cess
es.
Form
3–
Are
flo
wch
arts
avai
lab
lefo
ral
lpro
du
cts?
–A
reth
efl
ow
char
tsd
ated
?<fl
ow
char
tsfo
ral
lpro
du
cts>
Flo
wch
arts
are
un
avai
lab
lefo
ran
yo
fth
ep
rod
uct
s,ch
arts
or
are
no
tco
nfo
rmto
the
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
n.
2.2.
3.4
On
-sit
eco
nfi
rmat
ion
of
the
flo
wd
iag
ram
Th
eri
skas
sess
men
tte
amsh
all
revi
ewth
ep
roce
sses
atal
lop
erat
ion
stag
esag
ain
stth
efl
ow
dia
gra
m.
Wh
ere
app
rop
riat
e,am
end
men
tso
fth
ed
iag
ram
will
be
mad
e.
Form
3–
Was
the
flo
wch
art
con
firm
edd
uri
ng
ah
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
mee
tin
g?
<mee
tin
gm
inu
tes>
Wh
enfl
ow
char
tsar
en
ot
valid
ated
.
2.2.
3.5
Co
nd
uct
ah
azar
dan
alys
isan
dri
skas
sess
men
tfo
rea
chst
epA
nas
sess
men
tsh
allb
eav
aila
ble
of
allp
hys
ical
,ch
emic
alan
db
iolo
gic
alh
azar
ds
that
may
reas
on
ably
be
exp
ecte
d.
Form
3,5,
6,7
–D
oes
ah
azar
dan
alys
is/r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
exis
tfo
rea
chst
ep?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>–
Do
esit
incl
ud
eev
ery
haz
ard
?–
Wh
ich
bio
log
ical
,ph
ysic
alan
dch
emic
alh
azar
ds
can
be
exp
ecte
d?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
Wh
ena
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
-m
ent
was
no
tp
erfo
rmed
for
each
step
.W
hen
haz
ard
sw
ere
no
tp
rop
erly
asse
ssed
or
no
tal
lsig
nifi
can
th
azar
ds
wer
eta
ken
into
acco
un
tan
da
safe
tyis
sue
exis
ts.
2.2.
3.5.
1T
he
haz
ard
anal
ysis
shal
ldem
on
-st
rate
the
mo
tiva
tio
nif
ah
azar
dis
ari
sk,t
akin
gin
toac
cou
nt
the
likel
iho
od
of
har
mto
the
con
sum
eran
dth
ep
ote
nti
alse
veri
tyo
fd
amag
e(e
ffec
t,p
ote
nti
alco
nse
qu
ence
s).
–D
oes
ah
azar
dan
alys
isfo
ral
lpro
du
ctg
rou
ps
incl
ud
ing
har
man
dlik
elih
oo
dex
ist?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
Wh
en,d
ue
tola
cko
fa
haz
ard
anal
ysis
,asa
fety
risk
exis
ts.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 59
2.2.
3.5.
2A
llri
sks
that
nee
dsp
ecifi
cm
on
ito
r-in
gan
d/o
rp
reve
nti
veac
tio
ns
shal
lb
eid
enti
fied
asC
on
tro
lPo
ints
(CP
).C
lear
limit
san
dre
gis
trat
ion
of
the
risk
iden
tifi
cati
on
shal
lbe
avai
lab
le.
4.1
6.5
Form
3,5,
6,7,
8
Eac
hp
rere
qu
isit
ep
rog
ram
req
uir
esp
rop
erd
ocu
men
tati
on
of
the
pro
gra
mel
e-m
ents
and
sup
po
rtin
gin
form
atio
nin
clu
din
g,
bu
tn
ot
limit
edto
:–
Sta
nd
ard
op
erat
ing
pro
ced
ure
s.–
Form
s.–
Ch
eckl
ists
.–
Co
rrec
tive
Act
ion
Rep
ort
s.–
Foo
dS
afet
yP
rog
ram
Rea
sses
smen
t.C
han
ges
toth
ep
rere
q-
uis
ite
pro
gra
ms
will
be
revi
ewed
and
app
rove
db
yau
tho
rize
dp
erso
nn
el.
–W
hic
hC
Ps
wer
ed
efin
ed?
–H
ow
man
yC
Ps
exis
t–
Isa
clea
rlim
itd
efin
edfo
rea
chC
P?
–W
hat
clea
rlim
its
are
defi
ned
?–
Ho
ww
ere
the
crit
ical
limit
sd
eter
min
ed?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
><fl
ow
char
t><d
ecis
ion
tree
>
Wh
enth
ere
are
no
clea
rlim
its
for
each
CP
or
they
are
insu
ffici
ent
and
this
cau
ses
asa
fety
risk
.
2.2.
3.5.
3Fo
ral
lris
ksth
atar
eid
enti
fied
asC
on
tro
lPo
ints
(CP
)to
man
age
the
iden
tifi
edri
sk,t
he
com
pan
ysh
all
imp
lem
ent,
mai
nta
inan
dd
ocu
men
tsp
ecifi
cp
reve
nti
vem
easu
res
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
pro
ced
ure
s.R
eco
rds
of
mo
nit
ori
ng
shal
lbe
mai
nta
ined
for
are
leva
nt
per
iod
.
Form
3,5,
6,7,
8–
Ho
war
eC
Ps
mo
nit
ore
d?
–A
reth
eC
Ps
un
der
con
tro
l?–
Ho
wis
the
mo
nit
ori
ng
of
each
CP
do
cum
ente
d?
–W
ho
do
cum
ents
?–
Are
dat
e,ti
me,
resp
on
sib
leem
plo
yee
and
resu
lt/r
ead
ing
do
cum
ente
d?
–H
ow
lon
gw
illre
cord
sb
est
ore
d?
–W
her
ear
ere
cord
sst
ore
d?
–W
hic
hp
rere
qu
isit
em
easu
res
are
do
cu-
men
ted
?–
Ho
war
eth
em
easu
res
do
cum
ente
d?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
><fl
ow
char
t>,
<dec
isio
ntr
ee>,
<pre
req
uis
ite
mea
sure
s>
Wh
enC
Ps
wer
en
ot
iden
tifi
edas
such
and
/or
they
are
no
tu
nd
erp
erm
anen
tco
ntr
ols
oth
ata
safe
tyri
skex
ists
.
2.2.
3.6
Est
ablis
hco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sFo
rea
chC
Pco
rrec
tive
acti
on
ssh
all
be
esta
blis
hed
.In
case
the
mo
nit
or-
ing
ind
icat
esth
ata
par
ticu
lar
CP
isn
ot
un
der
con
tro
l,ad
equ
ate
corr
ec-
tive
acti
on
ssh
allb
eta
ken
and
do
cum
ente
d.S
uch
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
shal
lals
ota
kein
toac
cou
nt
any
no
n-c
on
form
ing
pro
du
cts.
Form
10–
Wh
atco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sex
ist
for
each
CP
?–
Wh
enw
asa
corr
ecti
veac
tio
nca
rrie
do
ut?
–W
her
ear
eco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sd
ocu
-m
ente
d?
–W
ho
do
cum
ents
the
take
nco
rrec
tive
acti
on
s?<C
Pre
cord
s><c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
Wh
enth
ere
are
no
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
defi
ned
or
no
corr
ec-
tive
acti
on
sar
eta
ken
.W
hen
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
are
no
td
ocu
men
ted
.
© IFS, October 2012
60 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
2.2.
3.7
Est
ablis
hve
rifi
cati
on
pro
ced
ure
sP
roce
du
res
of
veri
fica
tio
nsh
allb
ees
tab
lish
edto
con
firm
that
the
risk
man
agem
ent
syst
emis
effe
ctiv
e.V
erifi
cati
on
of
the
risk
man
agem
ent
syst
emsh
allb
ep
erfo
rmed
atle
ast
on
cea
year
.Exa
mp
les
of
veri
fica
tio
nac
tivi
ties
incl
ud
e:–
inte
rnal
aud
its,
–an
alys
is,
–sa
mp
ling
,–
eval
uat
ion
s,–
com
pla
ints
by
auth
ori
ties
and
cust
om
ers.
Th
ere
sult
so
fth
isve
rifi
cati
on
shal
lb
ein
corp
ora
ted
into
the
risk
man
-ag
emen
tsy
stem
.
6.2
Form
10V
erifi
cati
on
acti
viti
esar
eco
mp
lete
dfo
rea
chp
rere
qu
isit
ep
rog
ram
toco
nfi
rmth
atth
ep
rog
ram
sar
e:–
Pro
per
lyim
ple
-m
ente
d.
–A
deq
uat
ely
mai
n-
tain
ed.
–S
uit
able
toth
eo
per
atio
ns
of
that
esta
blis
hm
ent
inco
ntr
olli
ng
iden
tifi
edfo
od
safe
tyh
azar
ds.
Ver
ifica
tio
nac
tivi
ties
may
incl
ud
e,b
ut
are
no
tlim
ited
to:
–In
tern
alIn
spec
tio
ns.
–D
ocu
men
tre
view
.–
Inte
rnal
Au
dit
s.–
Ext
ern
alA
ud
its,
Ass
essm
ents
,In
spec
tio
ns.
–E
nd
pro
du
ctte
stin
g.
–H
ow
oft
enis
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
veri
fied
?–
Wh
atw
asth
ed
ate
of
the
last
veri
fica
tio
n?
–W
hat
was
the
resu
lto
fth
ela
stve
rifi
ca-
tio
n?
–D
oes
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
refl
ect
the
resu
lts
of
the
veri
fica
tio
n?
–W
hat
was
the
last
dat
ew
hen
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
was
chan
ged
?<a
ud
itre
po
rts
or
oth
erre
po
rts
for
valid
atio
n>
Wh
enn
ove
rifi
cati
on
was
carr
ied
ou
tan
dth
isle
ads
toa
safe
tyri
sk.
2.2.
3.8
Est
ablis
hd
ocu
men
tati
on
Do
cum
enta
tio
nsh
allb
eav
aila
ble
,co
veri
ng
allp
roce
sses
,pro
ced
ure
s,m
easu
res
and
reco
rds.
Do
cum
enta
-ti
on
and
reco
rdke
epin
gsh
allb
eap
pro
pri
ate
toth
en
atu
rean
dsi
zeo
fth
eco
mp
any.
4.1
Do
cum
ents
are
crea
ted
and
mai
nta
ined
toen
sure
the
effe
ctiv
ed
evel
op
men
t,im
ple
-m
enta
tio
n,m
ain
te-
nan
cean
dim
pro
ve-
men
to
fth
efo
od
safe
tysy
stem
.
–W
hat
haz
ard
anal
ysis
/ris
kas
sess
men
tp
lan
rela
ted
do
cum
ents
exis
t?–
Do
thes
ed
ocu
men
tsin
clu
de
pro
cess
es,
pro
ced
ure
san
dre
sult
s?<i
nsp
ecti
on
pla
ns>
,<re
cord
s>,
<pro
du
ctd
escr
ipti
on
s>,
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>,<r
isk
asse
ssm
ent>
Wh
enh
azar
dan
aly-
sis/
risk
asse
ssm
ent
pla
nis
no
tsu
ffici
entl
yd
ocu
men
ted
and
this
lead
sto
ale
gal
ity
issu
e.
3R
eso
urc
eM
anag
emen
t
3.1
Hu
man
reso
urc
esm
anag
emen
t
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 61
3.1.
1A
llp
erso
nn
elp
erfo
rmin
gw
ork
that
affe
cts
pro
du
ctsa
fety
,leg
alit
yan
dq
ual
ity
shal
lhav
eth
ere
qu
ired
com
pet
ence
by
edu
cati
on
,wo
rkex
per
ien
cean
d/o
rtr
ain
ing
,co
mm
en-
sura
tew
ith
thei
rro
le,b
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks.
D1.
1.1
1–
Ho
wis
itas
sure
dth
atn
ewem
plo
yees
hav
eth
eri
gh
tca
pab
iliti
esfo
rth
ejo
b?
Wh
en,d
ue
tola
cko
fed
uca
tio
n,e
xper
ien
ceo
rtr
ain
ing
the
leg
alit
yo
rsa
fety
of
the
pro
du
ctis
jeo
par
diz
ed.
3.2
Hu
man
reso
urc
es
3.2.
1P
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
3.2.
1.1
Th
ere
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
dre
qu
ire-
men
tsre
lati
ng
top
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne.
Th
ese
incl
ud
e,as
am
inim
um
,th
efo
llow
ing
fiel
ds:
–p
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
–h
and
was
hin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
–ea
tin
gan
dd
rin
kin
g–
smo
kin
g–
acti
on
sto
be
take
nin
case
of
cuts
or
skin
abra
sio
ns
–fi
ng
ern
ails
,jew
elry
and
per
son
alb
elo
ng
ing
s–
hai
ran
db
eard
s.T
he
req
uir
emen
tssh
allb
eb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks
inre
lati
on
top
rod
uct
and
pro
cess
.
D1.
1.1
D2.
1.1
/2
2,3,
4–
Wh
atis
the
po
licy
reg
ard
ing
per
son
alh
ygie
ne?
<hyg
ien
eru
les
for
emp
loye
es>
–T
he
rule
sre
gar
din
gp
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
incl
ud
eh
and
clea
nin
g,f
oo
d,b
ever
ages
and
oth
erm
ater
ial,
smo
kin
g,h
and
ling
of
inju
ries
,fin
ger
nai
lsan
dje
wel
ry,h
air
and
bea
rds?
–A
reth
eru
les
bas
edo
na
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–W
her
eis
ital
low
edto
smo
ke?
–H
ow
sho
uld
lesi
on
sb
etr
eate
d/c
ove
red
?–
Wh
atki
nd
so
fh
air
rest
rain
tsar
en
eed
edin
wh
ich
area
s?E
xam
ple
of
resu
ltfr
om
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks:
ifg
love
sar
eu
sed
,th
enh
and
dis
infe
ctio
nis
no
tre
qu
ired
for
low
risk
pro
du
ctio
n.
Wh
enin
suffi
cien
tru
les
for
per
son
alh
ygie
ne
cau
sea
safe
tyri
sk.
Wh
enn
oco
rres
po
nd
-in
gh
azar
dan
alys
isex
ists
.
3.2.
1.2
KO
KO
N°
2:T
he
req
uir
emen
tsfo
rp
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
shal
lbe
inp
lace
and
app
lied
by
allr
elev
ant
per
son
-n
el,c
on
trac
tors
and
visi
tors
.
–H
ow
isth
eh
ygie
ne
po
licy
com
mu
nic
ated
?<h
ygie
ne
rule
sfo
rem
plo
yees
>–
Are
per
son
nel
hyg
ien
eru
les
also
follo
w-
edb
yex
tern
alse
rvic
ep
rovi
der
s/w
ork
men
and
visi
tors
?<h
ygie
ne
rule
sfo
rvi
sito
rs>
–H
ow
isit
assu
red
that
exte
rnal
per
son
skn
ow
the
rele
van
th
ygie
ne
rule
s?<h
ygie
ne
rule
sfo
rvi
sito
rs>
Wh
en,d
uri
ng
the
aud
itm
ajo
rvi
ola
tio
ns
of
the
rule
sar
eid
enti
fied
that
lead
toa
safe
tyri
sk.
3.2.
1.3
Co
mp
lian
cew
ith
per
son
nel
hyg
ien
ere
qu
irem
ents
shal
lbe
chec
ked
reg
ula
rly.
–H
ow
are
emp
loye
esm
on
ito
red
du
rin
gw
ork
?<h
and
swab
test
s,et
c.>
–Is
emp
loye
eco
mp
lian
ceto
hyg
ien
eru
les
chec
ked
on
are
gu
lar
bas
is?
<min
ute
ssi
tein
spec
tio
n>,
<lis
to
fid
enti
fied
failu
res>
,etc
.
© IFS, October 2012
62 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
3.2.
1.4
Vis
ible
jew
elry
(in
cl.p
ierc
ing
)an
dw
atch
essh
alln
ot
be
wo
rn.A
ny
exce
pti
on
ssh
allh
ave
bee
nco
mp
re-
hen
sive
lyev
alu
ated
by
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ci-
ated
risk
sin
rela
tio
nto
pro
du
ctan
dp
roce
ss.T
his
shal
lbe
effe
ctiv
ely
man
aged
.
D1.
1.1
D2.
1.1
D1.
2.1
2,3
1 3
–Is
ital
low
edto
use
jew
elry
and
wat
ches
inp
rod
uct
ion
area
s?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
Isal
low
ance
bas
edo
nri
skh
azar
dan
alys
is?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
Wh
enw
eari
ng
jew
elry
or
aw
atch
cau
ses
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialo
rem
plo
yee
safe
tyri
sk.
3.2.
1.5
Cu
tsan
dsk
inab
rasi
on
ssh
allb
eco
vere
db
ya
colo
red
pla
ster
/ban
d-
age
(dif
fere
nt
fro
mth
ep
rod
uct
colo
r)—
con
tain
ing
am
etal
stri
p,
wh
ere
app
rop
riat
e—
and
inca
seo
fh
and
inju
ries
,in
add
itio
nto
ap
last
er/b
and
age,
asi
ng
leu
seg
love
shal
lbe
wo
rn.
D2.
2.1
–31,
2,3
–W
hat
colo
ris
pla
ster
and
wh
ere
isit
use
d?
–D
oes
the
pla
ster
con
tain
am
etal
stri
p?
–W
hat
isan
emp
loye
ere
qu
ired
too
bse
rve
inca
seo
fh
and
inju
ry?
<per
son
nel
hyg
ien
eru
les>
Wh
enh
and
inju
ries
ensu
ea
pro
du
ctsa
fety
risk
(e.g
.an
un
cove
red
pu
rule
nt
wo
un
dth
atco
mes
into
con
tact
wit
hth
ep
rod
uct
).
3.2.
2W
ork
ing
con
dit
ion
san
dp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
for
per
son
nel
,co
ntr
acto
rsan
dvi
sito
rs
3.2.
2.1
Co
mp
any
pro
ced
ure
ssh
alle
xist
toen
sure
that
allp
erso
nn
el,c
on
trac
tors
and
visi
tors
are
awar
eo
fth
eru
les
reg
ard
ing
the
man
agem
ent
of
wea
rin
gan
dch
ang
ing
of
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
gin
spec
ified
area
sin
acco
rd-
ance
wit
hp
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
ts.
D2.
1.1
–21,
2–
Wh
atar
eth
eru
les
reg
ard
ing
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
g?
<per
son
nel
hyg
ien
eru
les>
–A
reth
ep
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
rule
sb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–W
hen
mu
stp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
be
chan
ged
?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
exam
ple
so
far
eas:
cate
rin
g,c
han
gin
gro
om
s,sm
oki
ng
area
,to
ilets
,etc
.
Wh
enth
ela
cko
fp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
ensu
esa
pro
du
ctsa
fety
risk
.
3.2.
2.2
Inw
ork
area
sw
her
ew
eari
ng
hea
dg
ear
and
/or
bea
rdsn
oo
d(c
ove
r-in
gs)
isre
qu
ired
,th
eh
air
shal
lbe
cove
red
com
ple
tely
,so
that
pro
du
ctco
nta
min
atio
nis
pre
ven
ted
.
D2.
1.2
1–
Inw
hic
hp
rod
uct
ion
area
sis
wea
rin
go
fp
rote
ctiv
eh
ead
gea
ran
d/o
rb
eard
sno
od
man
dat
ory
?–
Wh
atki
nd
of
hea
dg
ear
isu
sed
?–
Ho
wsh
allh
ead
gea
rb
eu
sed
?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>
Wh
enin
corr
ect
wea
rin
go
rab
sen
ceo
fh
ead
gea
ran
d/o
rb
ear
sno
od
ensu
esa
pro
du
ctsa
fety
risk
.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 63
3.2.
2.3
Cle
arly
defi
ned
usa
ge
rule
ssh
all
exis
tfo
rw
ork
area
s/ac
tivi
ties
wh
ere
itis
req
uir
edto
wea
rg
love
s(c
olo
red
dif
fere
ntl
yfr
om
the
pro
du
ctco
lor)
.C
om
plia
nce
wit
hth
ese
rule
ssh
allb
ech
ecke
do
na
reg
ula
rb
asis
.
D2.
1.2
–In
wh
ich
pro
du
ctio
nar
eas
isw
eari
ng
of
glo
ves
man
dat
ory
?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
Wh
atki
nd
so
fg
love
sar
eu
sed
?W
hen
mu
stg
love
sb
ech
ang
ed?
–H
ow
isth
eco
mp
lian
cew
ith
thes
eru
les
chec
ked
?<o
nsi
tein
spec
tio
ns>
Wh
enm
issi
ng
or
un
clea
ng
love
sen
sue
ap
rod
uct
safe
tyri
sk.
3.2.
2.4
Su
itab
lep
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
shal
lbe
avai
lab
lein
suffi
cien
tq
uan
tity
for
each
emp
loye
e,w
hen
req
uir
ed.
–H
ow
man
yp
rote
ctiv
esu
its/
un
ifo
rms
are
atth
ed
isp
osa
lof
each
emp
loye
e?–
Ho
wo
ften
isan
emp
loye
esu
pp
ose
dto
chan
ge
his
/her
pro
tect
ive
suit
/un
ifo
rm?
Wh
enem
plo
yees
do
no
th
ave
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
gan
dth
eref
ore
ap
rod
uct
con
tam
ina-
tio
nri
skex
ists
.
3.2.
2.5
Wh
enre
qu
ired
,all
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
gsh
allb
eth
oro
ug
hly
and
reg
ula
rly
lau
nd
ered
.Haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks,
tog
eth
erw
ith
con
sid
erat
ion
giv
ento
the
pro
cess
esan
dp
rod
uct
so
fth
eco
mp
any
shal
ldet
erm
ine
ifcl
oth
ing
shal
lbe
was
hed
by
aco
ntr
act
lau
nd
ry,o
nsi
tela
un
dry
or
by
the
emp
loye
e.
–H
ow
isp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
lau
nd
ered
?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
Are
ther
ean
yem
plo
yees
wh
ola
un
der
thei
rp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
ath
om
e?–
Isp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
esla
un
der
ing
bas
edo
na
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
Wh
enin
suffi
cien
tla
un
der
ing
ensu
esa
pro
du
ctco
nta
min
a-ti
on
risk
.
3.2.
2.6
Gu
idel
ines
shal
lexi
stfo
rla
un
der
ing
of
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
gan
da
pro
ce-
du
resh
allb
ein
pla
cefo
rch
ecki
ng
its
clea
nlin
ess,
wh
enre
qu
ired
.
–H
ow
isth
ela
un
der
ing
pro
ced
ure
chec
ked
for
effe
ctiv
enes
s?<p
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
essw
abte
stre
sult
s>–
Wh
atg
uid
elin
esex
ist
reg
ard
ing
pro
tec-
tive
clo
thes
lau
nd
erin
g?
<per
son
nel
hyg
ien
eru
les>
3.2.
2.7
Sen
ior
man
agem
ent
shal
len
sure
haz
ard
ou
sw
ork
ing
con
dit
ion
sth
atco
uld
cau
sein
juri
esto
per
son
nel
are
iden
tifi
edan
dp
reve
nti
vem
easu
res
are
man
aged
.
Ho
wth
eg
oo
dw
ork
ing
con
dit
ion
of
per
son
nel
isfo
llow
ed?
Ho
war
ep
erso
nn
elin
form
ed?
3.2.
2.8
Th
eco
mp
any
shal
lrev
iew
that
pre
ven
tive
mea
sure
sto
ensu
rep
erso
nn
elsa
fety
rela
ted
toh
azar
d-
ou
sw
ork
ing
con
dit
ion
sar
eef
fect
ive,
inlin
ew
ith
app
licab
lele
gis
lati
on
or
reco
gn
ized
con
ven
tio
ns.
Do
esan
insp
ecti
on
pla
nex
ist?
<rep
ort
of
insp
ecti
on
>
© IFS, October 2012
64 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
3.2.
3P
roce
du
res
app
licab
leto
infe
ctio
us
dis
ease
s
3.2.
3.1
Th
ere
shal
lbe
wri
tten
and
com
mu
ni-
cate
dm
easu
res
for
per
son
nel
,co
ntr
acto
rsan
dvi
sito
rsto
dec
lare
any
infe
ctio
us
dis
ease
wh
ich
may
hav
ean
imp
act
on
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety.
Inca
seo
fd
ecla
rati
on
of
infe
ctio
us
dis
ease
,act
ion
ssh
allb
eta
ken
ino
rder
tom
inim
ize
risk
of
con
tam
inat
ion
of
pro
du
cts.
D2.
1.1
–2D
2.2.
1–3
1,2
1,2,
3,4,
5–
Ho
wsh
allp
erso
nn
elan
dvi
sito
rsb
ehav
ein
case
or
susp
icio
no
fan
infe
ctio
us
dis
ease
?–
Ho
wis
iten
sure
dth
atp
erso
nn
elan
dvi
sito
rskn
ow
the
gu
idel
ines
?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s><v
isit
ors
hyg
ien
eru
les>
Wh
end
ue
toan
emp
loye
e’s
infe
ctio
us
dis
ease
ap
rod
uct
safe
tyri
skis
giv
enan
dn
op
reve
nti
vest
eps
are
take
nb
yth
eco
mp
any.
3.3
Trai
nin
gan
din
stru
ctio
n
3.3.
1T
he
com
pan
ysh
alli
mp
lem
ent
do
cum
ente
dtr
ain
ing
and
/or
inst
ruc-
tio
np
rog
ram
sw
ith
resp
ect
toth
ep
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsan
dth
etr
ain
ing
nee
ds
of
the
emp
loye
esb
ased
on
thei
rjo
ban
dsh
alli
ncl
ud
e:–
trai
nin
gco
nte
nts
–tr
ain
ing
freq
uen
cy–
emp
loye
e’s
task
–la
ng
uag
es–
qu
alifi
edtr
ain
er/t
uto
r–
eval
uat
ion
met
ho
do
log
y.
D1.
2.1
–47.
0D
1/D
2D
1.1.
1
1,2,
3
1,2,
3,4,
5
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
trai
nin
g?
<tra
inin
gev
iden
ces>
–W
hat
are
the
evid
ence
sfo
rth
etr
ain
er’s
qu
alifi
cati
on
?–
Wh
atw
asth
eco
nte
nt
of
the
last
trai
nin
gse
ssio
n?
<tra
inin
gp
rog
ram
>–
Ho
war
efo
reig
nem
plo
yees
trai
ned
/in
stru
cted
?–
Wh
op
arti
cip
ates
inth
etr
ain
ing
sess
ion
s?–
Ho
war
eth
ein
stru
ctio
nn
eces
siti
esfo
rea
chem
plo
yee
det
erm
ined
?–
Ho
wo
ften
are
trai
nin
gse
ssio
ns
hel
d?
<tra
inin
gsc
hed
ule
>
Wh
end
ue
tola
cko
rin
suffi
cien
ttr
ain
ing
ap
rod
uct
safe
tyo
rle
gal
ity
risk
exis
ts.
Wh
enle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
inst
ruct
ion
sar
en
ot
un
der
take
n.
3.3.
2T
he
do
cum
ente
dtr
ain
ing
and
/or
inst
ruct
ion
shal
lap
ply
toal
lper
son
-n
el,i
ncl
ud
ing
seas
on
alan
dte
mp
o-
rary
wo
rker
san
dem
plo
yees
fro
mex
tern
alco
mp
anie
s,em
plo
yed
inth
ere
spec
tive
wo
rkar
ea.U
po
nem
plo
y-m
ent,
and
bef
ore
com
men
cin
gw
ork
,th
eysh
allb
etr
ain
edin
acco
rdan
cew
ith
the
do
cum
ente
dtr
ain
-in
g/i
nst
ruct
ion
pro
gra
ms.
D1.
2.1–
41,
2,3,
7–
Are
pro
spec
tive
emp
loye
es(i
ncl
.sea
-so
nal
and
tem
po
rary
wo
rker
s)tr
ain
ed/i
nst
ruct
edu
po
nem
plo
ymen
t?–
Wh
ich
emp
loye
esar
etr
ain
ed/i
nst
ruct
edu
po
nem
plo
ymen
t?W
hat
isth
eco
nte
nt
of
thes
ein
stru
ctio
ns?
<tra
inin
gev
iden
ces>
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 65
3.3.
3R
eco
rds
shal
lbe
avai
lab
leo
fal
ltr
ain
ing
/in
stru
ctio
nev
ents
,sta
tin
g:
–lis
to
fp
arti
cip
ants
(th
issh
all
incl
ud
eth
eir
sig
nat
ure
)–
dat
e–
du
rati
on
–co
nte
nts
of
trai
nin
g–
nam
eo
ftr
ain
er/t
uto
r.T
her
esh
allb
ea
pro
ced
ure
or
pro
gra
min
pla
ceto
pro
veth
eef
fect
iven
ess
of
the
trai
nin
gan
d/o
rin
stru
ctio
np
rog
ram
s.
D1.
2.1
–45,
7–
Wh
ich
trai
nin
gco
urs
esar
eu
nd
erta
ken
?–
Are
ther
ean
ysp
ecia
ltra
inin
gco
urs
es?
–A
retr
ain
ing
cou
rses
do
cum
ente
d?
–W
hat
has
bee
nd
ocu
men
ted
?–
Hav
ep
arti
cip
ants
sig
ned
the
trai
nin
gp
roo
fs?
–H
ow
oft
enar
eh
ygie
ne
trai
nin
gse
ssio
ns
hel
d?
–W
hat
was
the
con
ten
to
fth
ela
sth
ygie
ne
trai
nin
gse
ssio
n?
<tra
inin
gev
iden
ces>
No
trai
nin
gp
roo
fsex
ist
toco
nfi
rmth
atem
plo
yees
wer
etr
ain
ed/i
nst
ruct
ed.
3.3.
4T
he
con
ten
tso
ftr
ain
ing
and
/or
inst
ruct
ion
shal
lbe
revi
ewed
and
up
dat
edre
gu
larl
yan
dta
kein
toac
cou
nt
com
pan
y’s
spec
ific
issu
es,
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety,
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lrel
ated
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
and
pro
du
ct/p
roce
ssm
od
ifica
tio
ns.
D1.
2.1
–44,
5–
Ho
war
etr
ain
ing
con
ten
tsre
view
ed?
<rev
iew
test
>–
Wh
enar
etr
ain
ing
con
ten
tsre
view
ed?
–W
hen
was
the
late
sttr
ain
ing
con
ten
tu
pd
ate
do
ne?
–W
hat
was
the
con
ten
to
fth
ela
test
up
dat
e?<a
ud
itre
sult
s>–
spec
ific
issu
es:n
on
-co
nfo
rmit
ites
,fai
lure
,co
mp
lain
ts,e
tc
Du
rin
gth
eo
n-s
ite
aud
itev
iden
cew
asg
iven
that
emp
loye
esd
idn
ot
act
acco
rdin
gto
kno
wle
dg
etr
ans-
mit
ted
inth
etr
ain
ing
sess
ion
san
dth
isle
adto
ap
rod
uct
safe
tyri
sk.
3.4
San
itar
yfa
cilit
ies,
equ
ipm
ent
for
per
son
nel
hyg
ien
ean
dst
aff
faci
litie
s
3.4.
1T
he
com
pan
ysh
allp
rovi
de
staf
ffa
cilit
ies,
wh
ich
shal
lbe
pro
po
rtio
nal
insi
ze,e
qu
ipp
edfo
rth
en
um
ber
of
per
son
nel
and
des
ign
edan
do
per
-at
edso
asto
min
imiz
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yri
sks.
Su
chfa
cilit
ies
shal
lbe
kep
tin
clea
nan
dg
oo
dco
nd
itio
n.
A3.
1.2
7.0
A3
A3.
1.1
A3.
1.2
4 1,2,
31,
2,3,
4,5,
6,7,
8,9
–H
ow
man
yem
plo
yees
are
ther
e?–
Do
they
hav
eac
cess
toa
cafe
teri
a?–
Are
ther
elo
cker
-ro
om
s?–
Wh
ere
are
the
rest
roo
ms?
–A
reth
ere
bat
hin
gfa
cilit
ies?
<pla
nt
lay-
ou
t>–
Sta
fffa
cilit
ies
=e.
g.c
han
gin
gro
om
,sm
oki
ng
area
,din
ing
roo
m,e
tc.
Wh
enso
cial
faci
litie
sar
eu
nd
ereq
uip
ped
or
are
ou
to
fp
rop
ort
ion
toth
en
um
ber
of
emp
loye
esso
that
asa
fety
issu
ear
ises
.
3.4.
2T
he
risk
of
pro
du
ctco
nta
min
atio
nb
yfo
reig
nm
ater
ialf
rom
staf
ffa
cilit
ies
shal
lbe
eval
uat
edan
dm
inim
ized
.C
on
sid
erat
ion
shal
lals
ob
eg
iven
tofo
od
and
oth
erm
ater
ialb
rou
gh
tto
wo
rkb
yp
erso
nn
elan
dp
erso
nal
bel
on
gin
gs.
–M
ayem
plo
yees
bri
ng
foo
dan
do
ther
mat
eria
lfro
mh
om
e?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
May
emp
loye
esta
kem
edic
ine
alo
ng
toth
eir
wo
rkp
lace
?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
Do
esa
haz
ard
anal
ysis
exis
tre
gar
din
gfo
reig
nm
ater
ialf
rom
soci
alfa
cilit
ies?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
© IFS, October 2012
66 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
3.4.
3T
her
esh
allb
ein
pla
ceru
les
and
faci
litie
sto
ensu
reth
eco
rrec
tm
anag
emen
tfo
rp
erso
nn
elb
elo
ng
-in
gs
and
for
foo
dan
do
ther
mat
eria
lb
rou
gh
tto
wo
rkb
yp
erso
nn
el,f
oo
dco
min
gfr
om
din
ing
roo
man
dfr
om
ven
din
gm
ach
ines
.Th
efo
od
and
oth
erm
ater
ials
hal
lon
lyb
est
ore
dan
d/o
ru
sed
ind
esig
nat
edar
eas.
3.4.
4T
he
com
pan
ysh
allp
rovi
de
suit
able
chan
gin
gro
om
sfo
rp
erso
nn
el,
con
trac
tors
and
visi
tors
.Wh
ere
nec
essa
ry,o
utd
oo
rcl
oth
ing
and
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
gsh
allb
est
ore
dse
par
atel
y.
A3.
1.2
7,8
–A
reth
ere
lock
er-r
oo
ms
for
emp
loye
esan
dvi
sito
rsw
ith
sep
arat
ion
for
ou
tdo
or
and
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
g?
3.4.
5To
ilets
shal
lno
th
ave
dir
ect
acce
ssto
anar
eaw
her
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
pro
du
cts
are
han
dle
d.T
he
toile
tssh
allb
eeq
uip
ped
wit
had
equ
ate
han
dw
ash
ing
faci
litie
s.S
anit
ary
faci
litie
ssh
allh
ave
adeq
uat
en
atu
ral
or
mec
han
ical
ven
tila
tio
n.M
ech
ani-
cala
irfl
ow
fro
ma
con
tam
inat
edar
eato
acl
ean
area
shal
lbe
avo
ided
.
A3.
1.2
A3.
1.1
6 3–
Do
toile
tso
pen
dir
ectl
yin
top
rod
uct
ion
area
s?W
hen
toile
tex
hau
s-ti
on
po
ses
aco
nta
mi-
nat
ion
risk
.
3.4.
6A
deq
uat
eh
and
hyg
ien
efa
cilit
ies
shal
lb
ep
rovi
ded
atac
cess
po
ints
toan
dw
ith
inp
rod
uct
ion
area
s,as
wel
las
atst
aff
faci
litie
s.B
ased
on
haz
ard
ana-
lysi
san
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,fu
rth
erar
eas
(e.g
.wra
pp
ing
area
)sh
allb
esi
mila
rly
equ
ipp
ed.
A3.
1.1
1,2
–A
reth
ere
eno
ug
hh
and
was
hin
gfa
cilit
ies
avai
lab
leat
the
entr
ance
top
roce
ssin
gar
eas
and
inso
cial
area
s?
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
np
rob
lem
occ
urs
du
eto
lack
of
han
dw
ash
ing
faci
litie
s.
3.4.
7H
and
was
hin
gfa
cilit
ies
shal
lpro
vid
eas
am
inim
um
:–
run
nin
gp
ota
ble
wat
erat
anap
pro
pri
ate
tem
per
atu
re–
liqu
idso
ap–
app
rop
riat
eeq
uip
men
tfo
rh
and
dry
ing
.
A3.
1.1
1–
Are
allh
and
was
hin
gfa
cilit
ies
pro
vid
edw
ith
app
rop
riat
eeq
uip
men
tfo
rh
and
dry
ing
and
liqu
idso
ap?
–A
real
lhan
dw
ash
ing
faci
litie
sp
rovi
ded
wit
hru
nn
ing
po
tab
lew
ater
atan
app
ro-
pri
ate
tem
per
atu
re?
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 67
3.4.
8If
nec
essa
ry,f
ollo
win
gad
dit
ion
alre
qu
irem
ents
reg
ard
ing
han
dh
ygie
ne
shal
lals
ob
ep
rovi
ded
:–
han
dco
nta
ct-f
ree
fitt
ing
s–
han
dd
isin
fect
ion
–ad
equ
ate
hyg
ien
eeq
uip
men
ts–
sig
nag
eh
igh
ligh
tin
gh
and
hyg
ien
ere
qu
irem
ents
–w
aste
con
tain
erw
ith
han
dco
nta
ct-
free
op
enin
g.
A2.
1.1
1,2,
3,4,
5–
Are
alla
reas
wh
ere
du
eto
risk
asse
ss-
men
tex
ten
ded
hyg
ien
ere
qu
irem
ents
are
nec
essa
ryeq
uip
ped
wit
hh
and
was
hin
gfa
cilit
ies
wit
hh
and
con
tact
-fre
efi
ttin
gs,
han
dd
isin
fect
ion
dev
ices
and
sig
ns
or
pic
tog
ram
s?<s
ign
s/p
icto
gra
ms>
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
np
rob
lem
occ
urs
du
eto
lack
of
app
ro-
pri
ate
han
dw
ash
ing
faci
litie
s.
3.4.
9B
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks,
ther
esh
allb
ea
pro
gra
mto
con
tro
lef
fect
iven
ess
of
han
dh
ygie
ne.
A3.
1.1
2
3.4.
10C
han
gin
gro
om
ssh
allb
ese
par
ated
fro
mp
rod
uct
ion
area
and
shal
lbe
situ
ated
soth
atth
eyal
low
dir
ect
acce
ssto
the
area
sw
her
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialp
rod
uct
sar
eh
and
led
.B
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks,
exce
pti
on
ssh
allb
eju
stifi
edan
dm
anag
ed.
A3.
1.2
6–
Do
lock
er-r
oo
ms
giv
ed
irec
tac
cess
top
roce
ssin
gar
eas?
–H
ow
isp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
han
dle
dd
uri
ng
bre
aks/
inte
rval
s?<p
erso
nn
elh
ygie
ne
rule
s>–
Do
esa
haz
ard
anal
ysis
exis
tfo
rlo
cker
-ro
om
sw
ith
no
dir
ect
acce
ssto
pro
cess
-in
gar
eas?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
no
ccu
rsd
ue
tolo
cker
-ro
om
loca
tio
nw
hic
hle
ads
top
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
pro
du
ctsa
fety
pro
ble
m.
3.4.
11W
her
eth
eh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
ssh
ow
the
nec
essi
ty,c
lean
ing
faci
litie
ssh
all
be
avai
lab
lean
du
sed
for
bo
ots
,sh
oes
and
furt
her
pro
tect
ive
clo
thin
g.
–A
reth
ere
clea
nin
gfa
cilit
ies
for
bo
ots
and
pro
tect
ive
apro
ns?
4P
lan
nin
gan
dP
rod
uct
ion
Pro
cess
4.1
Co
ntr
act
agre
emen
t
4.1.
1T
he
req
uir
emen
tsw
hic
har
ed
efin
edb
etw
een
the
con
trac
tp
artn
ers
shal
lb
ees
tab
lish
ed,a
gre
edu
po
nan
dre
view
edco
nce
rnin
gth
eir
acce
pt-
abili
tyb
efo
rea
sup
ply
agre
emen
tis
con
clu
ded
.All
clau
ses
rela
ted
toq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
shal
lbe
kno
wn
and
com
mu
ni-
cate
dto
each
rele
van
td
epar
tmen
t.
–W
hat
assu
ran
ces
are
giv
enth
atcu
sto
mer
req
uir
emen
tsan
do
wn
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns
are
inac
cord
ance
wit
hea
cho
ther
?–
Do
wri
tten
sup
ply
agre
emen
tsw
ith
cust
om
ers
exis
t?–
Do
spec
ific
cust
om
erre
qu
irem
ents
for
pu
rch
ased
pro
du
cts
exis
t?–
Wh
och
ecks
and
app
rove
ssp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
s?–
Wh
oen
sure
sth
atth
ep
rop
erra
wm
ater
i-al
sar
eav
aila
ble
wh
enev
ern
eed
ed?
Wh
enth
ere
are
no
app
rove
dsp
ecifi
ca-
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
-ti
on
san
dn
ocl
arit
yex
ists
ifre
qu
ired
pro
du
ctca
nb
ed
eliv
ered
.
© IFS, October 2012
68 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.1.
2C
han
ges
of
exis
tin
gco
ntr
actu
alag
reem
ents
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
dan
dco
mm
un
icat
edb
etw
een
the
con
trac
tp
artn
ers.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
cust
om
ers
are
info
rmed
abo
ut
pro
du
ctch
ang
es?
–W
ho
chec
ksan
dap
pro
ves
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns?
4.2
Sp
ecifi
cati
on
san
dfo
rmu
las/
con
fig
u-
rati
on
s
4.2.
1S
pec
ifica
tio
ns
and
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
n
4.2.
1.1
Sp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
shal
lbe
avai
lab
lean
din
pla
cefo
ral
lfin
ish
edp
rod
uct
s.T
hey
shal
lbe
up
tod
ate,
un
amb
igu
ou
san
db
ein
com
plia
nce
wit
hle
gal
and
cust
om
erre
qu
ire-
men
ts.
–H
ow
are
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns
com
pile
d,
chec
ked
and
app
rove
d?
–A
reth
ere
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
sfo
ral
lfin
alp
rod
uct
s?–
Ho
war
eu
pto
dat
esp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
sre
cog
-n
izab
le?
<sp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
alre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
n>
Wh
enn
ot
alls
pec
ifi-
cati
on
sfo
rfi
nal
pro
du
cts
are
up
tod
ate
and
inco
nfo
rm-
ance
wit
hle
gal
req
uir
emen
ts.
4.2.
1.2
KO
KO
N°
3:S
pec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
shal
lb
eav
aila
ble
and
inp
lace
for
allr
awm
ater
ials
(raw
mat
eria
ls,a
dd
itiv
es,
inks
,ad
hes
ives
,so
lven
ts,w
rap
pin
gm
ater
ials
,rew
ork
).S
pec
ifica
tio
ns
shal
lbe
up
tod
ate,
un
amb
igu
ou
san
db
ein
com
plia
nce
wit
hle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsan
d,i
fex
isti
ng
,wit
hcu
sto
mer
req
uir
emen
ts.
Form
2–
Are
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
avai
lab
lefo
ral
lraw
mat
eria
ls,a
dd
itiv
es,i
nks
,ad
hes
ives
,so
lven
ts,w
rap
pin
gm
ater
iala
nd
rew
ork
?–
Wh
atas
sura
nce
isg
iven
that
spec
ifica
-ti
on
san
do
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
-m
enta
tio
nar
efo
llow
ed?
<evi
den
ceo
fsp
ecifi
cati
on
com
plia
nce
,e.
g.l
abre
sult
s>–
Wh
atas
sura
nce
isg
iven
that
spec
ifica
-ti
on
sar
ein
con
form
ance
wit
hle
gal
req
uir
emen
ts?
–W
ho
wri
tes,
chec
ksan
dap
pro
ves
spec
ifica
tio
ns?
Wh
enn
ot
allr
awm
ater
ials
,ad
dit
ives
,in
ks,a
dh
esiv
es,
solv
ents
,wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsan
dre
wo
rkh
ave
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
.W
hen
spec
ifica
tio
ns
do
no
tco
mp
lyw
ith
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
.
4.2.
1.3
Wh
ere
req
uir
edb
ycu
sto
mer
s,p
rod
uct
spec
ifica
tio
ns
shal
lbe
form
ally
agre
ed.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 69
4.2.
1.4
Sp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
and
/or
thei
rco
nte
nts
shal
lbe
pro
vid
edin
the
rele
van
tlo
cati
on
and
acce
ssib
leto
allr
elev
ant
per
son
nel
.
–W
ho
has
acce
ssto
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
n?
Wh
enke
yem
plo
yees
do
no
th
ave
acce
ssto
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
nan
da
pro
du
ctsa
fety
and
/or
leg
alre
qu
irem
ent
issu
een
sues
.
4.2.
1.5
Th
ere
shal
lbe
ap
roce
du
refo
rth
ecr
eati
on
,th
em
od
ifica
tio
nan
dap
pro
valo
fsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
for
allp
arts
of
the
pro
cess
,wh
ich
shal
lin
clu
de
the
pre
limin
ary
acce
pta
nce
of
the
cust
om
er,i
fsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
hav
eb
een
agre
edw
ith
cust
om
ers.
–W
ho
wri
tes,
amen
ds,
chec
ksan
dap
pro
ves
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
n?
Wh
ensp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
ta-
tio
nar
eu
sed
bu
th
ave
no
tb
een
pro
per
lyap
pro
ved
and
itis
no
tcl
ear
ifth
eyca
nb
eco
mp
lied
wit
h.
4.2.
1.6
Th
esp
ecifi
cati
on
/oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
nco
ntr
ol
pro
ced
ure
shal
lin
clu
de
the
up
dat
eo
ffi
nis
hed
pro
du
ctsp
ecifi
cati
on
inca
seo
fan
ym
od
ifica
tio
n:
–o
fra
wm
ater
ial
–o
ffo
rmu
la/c
on
fig
ura
tio
n–
of
pro
cess
wit
hin
flu
ence
on
the
fin
alp
rod
uct
s–
of
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lwit
hin
flu
-en
ceo
nth
efi
nal
pro
du
cts.
4.2.
2Fo
rmu
la/c
on
fig
ura
tio
n
4.2.
2.1
KO
N°
4:W
her
eth
ere
are
cust
om
erag
reem
ents
inre
lati
on
toth
ep
rod
uct
form
ula
/co
nfi
gu
rati
on
and
tech
no
log
ical
req
uir
emen
ts,t
hes
esh
allb
eco
mp
lied
wit
h.
–W
hat
assu
ran
ceis
giv
enth
atsp
ecifi
edco
nfi
gu
rati
on
isfo
llow
ed?
–H
ow
isco
nfi
gu
rati
on
com
plia
nce
chec
ked
?–
Ifn
osp
ecifi
cte
chn
olo
gic
alre
qu
irem
ents
and
/or
form
ula
sar
eag
reed
bet
wee
nth
eco
ntr
act
par
tner
s,th
efo
rmu
lao
fth
esu
pp
lier
isth
eb
asis
.In
this
case
the
req
uir
emen
tsh
allb
era
ted
wit
hN
/A.
Wh
enth
ere
isev
i-d
ence
that
con
fig
ura
-ti
on
and
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
spec
ifica
tio
ns
do
no
tfi
tto
get
her
.W
hen
du
rin
ga
trac
e-ab
ility
test
ther
eis
evid
ence
that
agre
edu
po
nco
nfi
gu
rati
on
isn
ot
com
plie
dw
ith
.
4.3
Pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
t/P
rod
uct
mo
difi
cati
on
/Mo
difi
cati
on
of
pro
du
ctio
np
roce
sses
Th
ere
qu
irem
ents
for
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
th
ave
tob
ech
ecke
dev
enif
ther
ear
eo
nly
pro
du
ctm
od
ifica
tio
ns
(new
ing
red
ien
tu
sed
,ch
ang
esin
pac
kag
ing
)o
rm
od
ifica
-ti
on
so
fp
rod
uct
ion
pro
cess
es.
© IFS, October 2012
70 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.3.
1A
pro
ced
ure
for
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
-m
ent
shal
lbe
inp
lace
wh
ich
inco
r-p
ora
tes
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
pri
nci
-p
les,
inac
cord
ance
wit
hth
eH
AC
CP
and
/or
risk
asse
ssm
ent
syst
em.
–H
ow
are
the
pro
cess
ing
pro
ced
ure
sfo
rp
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent
bu
iltu
p?
–D
op
roce
ssin
gp
roce
du
res
for
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
tal
soco
nta
ina
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
Wh
enn
op
roce
ssin
gp
roce
du
res
wer
ees
tab
lish
edfo
rp
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yan
d/o
rle
gal
issu
een
sues
.
4.3.
2P
rod
uct
form
ula
tio
n/c
on
fig
ura
tio
n,
man
ufa
ctu
rin
gp
roce
sses
,pro
cess
par
amet
ers
and
the
fulfi
lmen
to
fp
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tssh
allb
ees
tab
lish
edan
dsh
allh
ave
bee
nas
sure
db
yfa
cto
rytr
ials
and
pro
du
ctte
stin
g.
–W
hat
do
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
tp
roce
-d
ure
slo
ok
like?
<pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
tp
roce
du
res>
–W
hat
test
sar
em
ade
wh
ilea
pro
du
ctis
dev
elo
ped
?<t
est
resu
lts>
–Is
dev
elo
ped
pro
du
ctsu
bm
itte
dto
tria
lru
ns?
<tri
alru
nd
ocu
men
tati
on
>
Wh
enn
ewp
roce
ss-
ing
pro
ced
ure
s,co
nfi
gu
rati
on
san
dp
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsar
en
ot
ensu
red
by
test
san
dtr
ialr
un
san
den
ter
dir
ectl
yin
top
rod
uct
ion
and
this
enta
ilsa
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
/or
leg
alit
yis
sue
wh
ich
can
no
tb
eco
rrec
ted
.
4.3.
3R
eco
mm
end
atio
nfo
ru
se-t
ests
or
adeq
uat
ep
roce
sses
shal
lbe
carr
ied
ou
tan
dco
nsi
der
atio
ng
iven
top
rod
uct
form
ula
tio
n/c
on
fig
ura
tio
n,
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
l,m
anu
fact
uri
ng
and
dec
lare
dco
nd
itio
ns.
–H
ow
isre
com
men
ded
con
vert
ing
tim
ed
eter
min
ed?
<co
nve
rtin
gte
sts>
–A
rep
rod
uct
ssu
bm
itte
dto
con
vert
ing
tim
ete
sts?
<co
nve
rtin
gti
me
test
resu
lts>
Wh
enn
op
roo
ffo
rd
efin
edco
nve
rtin
gti
me
exis
tsan
da
safe
tyis
sue
can
occ
ur.
4.3.
4P
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent
shal
lco
nsi
der
the
resu
lts
of
org
ano
lep
tic
asse
ss-
men
ts.
–H
ow
oft
enar
eo
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts
mad
e?–
Wh
op
arti
cip
ates
ino
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts?
–A
reo
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts
do
cum
ente
d?
–H
ow
are
the
resu
lts
fro
mo
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts
take
nin
toco
nsi
der
atio
nd
uri
ng
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
t?<o
rgan
ole
pti
cte
stre
sult
sev
alu
atio
n>
4.3.
5A
pro
cess
shal
lbe
inp
lace
toen
sure
that
the
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
com
plie
sw
ith
curr
ent
leg
isla
tio
no
fd
esti
na-
tio
nco
un
try
and
cust
om
erre
qu
ire-
men
ts.
Wh
atki
nd
of
pro
cess
isim
ple
men
ted
for
leg
isla
tio
nap
pro
val?
Pro
cess
of
info
rma-
tio
ng
ath
erin
gap
pro
valp
roce
sse.
g.w
ith
cust
om
er.
–E
xpo
rtg
oes
tow
hic
hco
un
trie
s?W
hic
hco
un
trie
sh
ave
spec
ialr
equ
irem
ents
?
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 714.
3.6
Rec
om
men
dat
ion
sfo
rh
and
ling
and
/or
use
of
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eri-
als
shal
lbe
esta
blis
hed
.Wh
ere
app
rop
riat
e,cu
sto
mer
req
uir
emen
tssh
allb
ein
clu
ded
.
–W
ho
issu
esth
ecl
ich
es/p
rin
tin
gb
lock
app
rova
l?–
Wh
ois
sues
the
lab
els?
–W
ho
app
rove
sla
bel
s?–
Ho
wis
con
form
ity
of
the
pro
du
ctan
dla
bel
revi
ewed
?
Pro
du
ctan
dla
bel
ing
are
no
tin
con
form
ity
wit
hea
cho
ther
,th
us
crea
tin
ga
leg
alit
yp
rob
lem
.
4.3.
7T
he
pro
gre
ssan
dre
sult
so
fp
rod
uct
dev
elo
pm
ent
shal
lbe
pro
per
lyre
cord
ed.
–H
ow
are
con
vert
ing
reco
mm
end
atio
ns
and
/or
pro
du
ctu
sein
form
atio
nes
tab
-lis
hed
?–
Ho
war
eco
nve
rtin
gre
qu
irem
ents
take
nin
toco
nsi
der
atio
nd
uri
ng
pro
du
ctd
evel
op
men
t?<e
xam
ple
>
Wh
ena
safe
tyis
sue
occ
urs
du
eto
no
tta
kin
gcu
sto
mer
req
uir
emen
tsin
toac
cou
nt.
4.3.
8T
he
com
pan
ysh
alle
nsu
reth
atin
the
even
to
fch
ang
esto
pro
du
ctfo
rmu
la-
tio
n/c
on
fig
ura
tio
n,i
ncl
ud
ing
rew
ork
and
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
l,p
roce
ssch
arac
teri
stic
sar
ere
view
edin
ord
erto
assu
reth
atp
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsar
eco
mp
lied
wit
h.
4.4
Pu
rch
asin
g
4.4.
1G
ener
alp
urc
has
ing
4.4.
1.1
Th
eco
mp
any
shal
lco
ntr
olp
urc
has
-in
gp
roce
sses
toen
sure
that
all
exte
rnal
lyso
urc
edm
ater
ials
and
serv
ices
,wh
ich
hav
ean
imp
act
on
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
qu
alit
y,co
nfo
rmto
req
uir
emen
ts.
Wh
ere
aco
mp
any
cho
ose
sto
ou
tso
urc
ean
yp
roce
ssth
atm
ayh
ave
anim
pac
to
np
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yan
dq
ual
ity,
the
com
pan
ysh
alle
nsu
reco
ntr
olo
ver
such
pro
cess
es.C
on
tro
lof
such
ou
tso
urc
edp
roce
sses
shal
lbe
iden
tifi
edan
dd
ocu
men
ted
wit
hin
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
and
qu
alit
ym
anag
emen
tsy
stem
.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
pu
rch
ased
pro
d-
uct
san
dse
rvic
esco
nfo
rmto
spec
ifica
-ti
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
-ta
tio
no
ro
ther
leg
alre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
n?
Wh
enp
urc
has
edp
rod
uct
sd
on
ot
con
form
tosp
ecifi
ca-
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
-ti
on
and
thu
sen
tail
asa
fety
or
leg
alit
yp
rob
lem
.
© IFS, October 2012
72 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.4.
1.2
Th
ere
shal
lbe
ap
roce
du
refo
rap
pro
vala
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
of
sup
plie
rs(i
nte
rnal
and
exte
rnal
),o
uts
ou
rced
pro
du
ctio
no
rp
art
of
it.
–D
oes
anap
pro
valp
roce
du
reex
ist
for
new
sup
plie
rsan
dco
-pro
du
cer?
<su
pp
lier
pro
ced
ure
s>–
Ho
war
esu
pp
lies
mo
nit
ore
d?
–A
resu
pp
liers
gra
ded
?<s
up
plie
rg
rad
ing
syst
ems>
–H
ave
sup
plie
rsb
een
bar
red
?–
Ho
wis
ab
arre
dsu
pp
lier
iden
tifi
ed?
–H
ow
isth
eq
ual
ifica
tio
no
fsu
pp
liers
ensu
red
?<p
rod
uct
entr
ym
on
ito
rin
g>
<su
pp
lier
aud
its>
<lab
test
s>–
Are
ther
ean
yco
-pro
du
cers
?<c
o-p
acke
rslis
t>–
Ho
war
eco
-pro
du
cers
mo
nit
ore
d?
–A
reco
-pro
du
cers
IFS
PAC
secu
rece
rtifi
ed?
<cer
tifi
cate
>
Wh
enth
ere
are
no
app
rova
lpro
ced
ure
sfo
rsu
pp
liers
and
this
cau
ses
asa
fety
risk
.
4.4.
1.3
Th
eap
pro
vala
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
pro
ced
ure
shal
lco
nta
incl
ear
asse
ssm
ent
crit
eria
such
as:a
ud
its,
cert
ifica
tes
of
anal
ysis
,su
pp
lier
relia
bili
tyan
dco
mp
lain
ts,a
sw
ella
sre
qu
ired
per
form
ance
stan
dar
ds.
–H
ow
oft
enar
eex
tern
alau
dit
sm
ade?
<ext
ern
alau
dit
pla
n>
–W
hic
hcr
iter
iaar
eco
nsu
lted
for
sup
plie
ras
sess
men
t?–
Wh
ich
sup
plie
rh
asan
alys
isce
rtifi
cate
s?<a
nal
ysis
cert
ifica
tes>
–H
ow
was
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
for
sup
plie
rap
pro
valp
erfo
rmed
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
No
haz
ard
anal
ysis
was
mad
e.
4.4.
1.4
Th
ere
sult
so
fsu
pp
liers
’ass
ess-
men
tssh
allb
ere
view
edre
gu
larl
yan
dth
isre
view
shal
lbe
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s.T
her
esh
allb
ere
cord
so
fth
ere
view
san
do
fth
eac
tio
ns
take
nas
aco
nse
qu
ence
of
asse
ssm
ent.
–W
ho
revi
ews
the
resu
lts
of
sup
plie
ras
sess
men
ts?
–H
ow
oft
enar
eth
ere
sult
so
fsu
pp
lier
asse
ssm
ents
revi
ewed
?–
Wh
atac
tio
ns
are
take
naf
ter
revi
ewo
fth
ere
sult
sfo
rsu
pp
lier
asse
ssm
ents
?<a
ud
itre
sult
s>
Wh
enth
ere
sult
sfo
rsu
pp
lier
asse
ssm
ent
are
no
tta
ken
into
acco
un
tan
dth
isca
use
sa
safe
tyo
rle
gal
ity
issu
e.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 73
4.4.
1.5
Th
ep
urc
has
edp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
ech
ecke
din
acco
rdan
cew
ith
the
exis
tin
gsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
.Th
esc
hed
ule
of
thes
ech
ecks
shal
l,as
am
inim
um
,tak
ein
toac
cou
nt
the
follo
win
gcr
iter
ia;p
rod
uct
req
uir
e-m
ents
,su
pp
lier
stat
us
(acc
ord
ing
toit
sas
sess
men
t)an
dim
pac
to
fth
ep
urc
has
edp
rod
uct
so
nth
efi
nis
hed
pro
du
ct.I
fm
enti
on
edin
the
spec
ifi-
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
add
itio
nal
req
uir
edto
pic
ssh
allb
ech
ecke
d.
–H
ow
are
pu
rch
ased
pro
du
cts
and
thei
rsp
ecifi
cati
on
sre
view
ed?
<in
com
ing
pro
du
ctch
eck-
list>
<lab
test
s>–
Do
esa
test
sch
edu
leex
ist?
<tes
tsc
hed
ule
>
Wh
enp
urc
has
edp
rod
uct
sar
en
ever
chec
ked
on
com
pli-
ance
wit
hsp
ecifi
ca-
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
-ti
on
s.
4.4.
1.6
Th
ep
urc
has
edse
rvic
essh
allb
ech
ecke
din
acco
rdan
cew
ith
the
exis
tin
gsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
.Th
esc
hed
ule
of
thes
ech
ecks
shal
lat
leas
tta
kein
toac
cou
nt
the
follo
win
git
ems:
serv
ice
req
uir
emen
ts,s
up
plie
rst
atu
s(a
cco
rdin
gto
its
asse
ssm
ent)
and
imp
act
of
the
serv
ice
on
the
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
.
4.4.
2Tr
ade
of
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsM
ean
pu
rch
ased
pro
du
cts,
wh
ich
hav
eb
een
alre
ady
pro
cess
edan
dw
hic
har
eb
ou
gh
tan
dst
ore
do
n-s
ite
of
the
aud
ited
com
pan
y.
4.4.
2.1
Inca
sea
com
pan
ytr
ades
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ls,i
tsh
allb
een
sure
dth
ata
pro
cess
for
app
rovi
ng
and
mo
nit
or-
ing
sup
plie
rsex
ists
and
isim
ple
-m
ente
d.
Ifth
eco
mp
any
trad
esp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
asfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts
and
ifit
wan
tsto
incl
ud
eth
emin
the
aud
itsc
op
e,th
esu
pp
liers
of
thes
ep
rod
uct
ssh
allt
hem
-se
lves
be
IFS
PAC
secu
rece
rtifi
ed(i
fth
etr
ade
pro
du
cts
are
un
der
the
sam
ep
rod
uct
sco
pe)
or
cert
ified
un
der
aco
mp
arab
lesc
hem
e(i
fth
etr
ade
pro
du
cts
are
un
der
ad
iffe
ren
tp
rod
uct
sco
pe)
.C
om
pu
lso
ryfi
eld
inth
eco
mp
any
pro
file
:sp
ecif
yif
the
com
pan
yh
astr
ade
pro
du
cts.
© IFS, October 2012
74 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.4.
2.2
Inca
seo
ftr
aded
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ls,
the
pro
cess
for
app
rovi
ng
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
sup
plie
rssh
allc
on
tain
clea
ras
sess
men
tcr
iter
iasu
chas
:au
dit
s,ce
rtifi
cate
so
fan
alys
is,
sup
plie
rre
liab
ility
,co
mp
lain
tsas
wel
las
req
uir
edp
erfo
rman
cest
and
ard
s.
4.4.
2.3
Inca
seo
fp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
for
pri
vate
lab
els,
asu
pp
lier
app
rova
lsy
stem
inac
cord
ance
wit
hcu
sto
mer
req
uir
emen
tssh
alle
xist
for
pre
-su
p-
plie
rso
ffi
nis
hed
or
sem
i-fi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts.
4.5
Pro
du
ctw
rap
pin
g
4.5.
1B
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
,ass
essm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks
and
inte
nd
edu
se,
the
com
pan
ysh
alld
eter
min
eth
eke
yp
aram
eter
sfo
rth
ew
rap
pin
gm
ater
ial.
–D
oes
ari
skas
sess
men
tal
soex
ist
for
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lno
tin
dir
ect
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lco
nta
ct,t
op
rove
the
evid
ence
of
dir
ect
neg
ativ
ein
flu
ence
on
the
pro
du
ct?
4.5.
2D
etai
led
spec
ifica
tio
ns
shal
lexi
stfo
ral
lwra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsw
hic
hco
mp
lyw
ith
the
curr
ent
rele
van
tle
gis
lati
on
.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lco
mp
lies
wit
hcu
rren
tre
leva
nt
leg
isla
tio
n?
–W
ho
dev
elo
ps,
revi
ews
new
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
l?–
Are
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
nav
aila
ble
for
allw
rap
pin
gm
ater
ials
use
d?
<wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsp
ecifi
cati
on
s>
Wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lth
atd
oes
no
tco
mp
lyw
ith
leg
isla
tio
n.N
ot
allw
rap
pin
gm
ater
i-al
sh
ave
spec
ifica
-ti
on
s.
4.5.
3Fo
ral
lwra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lwh
ich
cou
ldh
ave
anin
flu
ence
on
pro
du
cts,
cert
i-fi
cate
so
fco
nfo
rmit
ysh
alle
xist
wh
ich
com
ply
wit
hcu
rren
tle
gal
req
uir
e-m
ents
.In
the
even
tth
atn
osp
ecifi
cle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsar
eap
plic
able
,ev
iden
cesh
allb
eav
aila
ble
tod
emo
n-
stra
teth
atw
rap
pin
gm
ater
iali
ssu
it-
able
for
use
.Th
isap
plie
sfo
rw
rap
-p
ing
mat
eria
lwh
ich
cou
ldh
ave
anin
flu
ence
on
raw
mat
eria
ls,s
emi-
pro
cess
edan
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 75
4.5.
4B
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks,
the
com
pan
ysh
allv
erif
yth
esu
itab
ility
of
the
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lfo
rea
chre
leva
nt
pro
du
ct(e
.g.o
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts,
sto
rag
ete
sts,
chem
ical
anal
y-si
s,m
igra
tio
nte
sts)
.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsh
ave
no
neg
ativ
eef
fect
so
nth
ep
rod
uct
?–
Has
ah
azar
dan
alys
isb
een
per
form
edin
rela
tio
nto
suit
abili
tyo
fw
rap
pin
gm
ate-
rial
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
No
haz
ard
anal
ysis
was
mad
e.
4.5.
5T
he
com
pan
ysh
alle
nsu
reth
atth
ew
rap
pin
gu
sed
corr
esp
on
ds
toth
ep
rod
uct
bei
ng
wra
pp
ed.T
he
use
of
corr
ect
wra
pp
ing
shal
lbe
reg
ula
rly
chec
ked
.
Wh
ich
syst
emh
asth
eco
mp
any
imp
le-
men
ted
toen
sure
that
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lis
suit
able
and
trac
eab
le?
4.5.
6P
rin
tin
gan
dla
bel
ing
info
rmat
ion
shal
lbe
leg
ible
,in
del
ible
and
shal
lco
mp
lyw
ith
agre
edcu
sto
mer
pro
du
ctsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
tati
on
s.T
his
shal
lbe
reg
ula
rly
chec
ked
and
chec
kssh
allb
ed
ocu
men
ted
.
4.6
Fact
ory
loca
tio
n
4.6.
1.T
he
com
pan
ysh
alli
nve
stig
ate
tow
hat
exte
nt
the
fact
ory
envi
ron
men
t(e
.g.g
rou
nd
,air
)m
ayh
ave
anad
vers
eim
pac
to
np
rod
uct
safe
tyan
dp
rod
uct
qu
alit
y.If
pro
du
ctsa
fety
and
qu
alit
yco
uld
be
com
pro
mis
ed,
app
rop
riat
em
easu
res
shal
lbe
esta
blis
hed
.Th
eef
fect
iven
ess
of
the
esta
blis
hed
mea
sure
ssh
allb
ep
erio
dic
ally
revi
ewed
(exa
mp
les:
extr
emel
yd
ust
yai
r,st
ron
gsm
ells
).
A1.
1.1
1,4
–D
oes
alo
cati
on
inve
stig
atio
nex
ist?
Can
loca
tio
nh
ave
an
egat
ive
infl
uen
ceo
np
rod
uct
qu
alit
y?<l
oca
tio
nan
alys
is>
–W
hat
pro
tect
ive
mea
sure
sh
ave
bee
nes
tab
lish
edif
po
ten
tial
lyd
amag
ing
mat
eria
ls/s
ub
stan
ces
are
nea
rby?
<pro
tect
ive
mea
sure
s><c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
–Is
effi
cien
cyo
fp
rote
ctiv
em
easu
res
reg
ula
rly
revi
ewed
?–
Wh
ore
view
sth
eef
fici
ency
of
the
esta
b-
lish
edp
rote
ctiv
em
easu
res?
–H
ow
isef
fici
ency
of
esta
blis
hed
pro
tec-
tive
mea
sure
sre
view
ed?
Wh
enco
mp
any
surr
ou
nd
ing
sh
ave
an
egat
ive
infl
uen
ceo
np
rod
uct
(e.g
.wat
ertr
eatm
ent)
and
no
pro
tect
ive
mea
sure
sh
ave
bee
nes
tab
lish
edan
dth
eref
ore
asa
fety
pro
ble
mex
ists
.W
hen
esta
blis
hed
pro
tect
ive
mea
sure
sar
eu
ncl
ear
or
wit
hq
ues
tio
nab
leef
fi-
cien
cyan
dth
eref
ore
asa
fety
pro
ble
mex
ists
.
4.7
Fact
ory
Ext
erio
r7.
0A
1
4.7.
1T
he
fact
ory
exte
rio
rsh
allb
em
ain
-ta
ined
tob
ecl
ean
and
tid
y.A
1.1.
12
–A
refa
cto
ryex
teri
ors
tid
y?–
Are
fact
ory
exte
rio
rsre
view
edth
rou
gh
inte
rnal
aud
its?
<au
dit
resu
lts>
© IFS, October 2012
76 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.7.
2A
llex
tern
alar
eas
of
the
fact
ory
shal
lb
em
ain
tain
edin
go
od
con
dit
ion
.W
her
en
atu
rald
rain
age
isin
ad-
equ
ate,
asu
itab
led
rain
age
syst
emsh
allb
ein
stal
led
.
A1.
1.1-
23,
6,7,
8–
Are
gro
un
ds
wit
hin
the
fact
ory
pre
mis
esin
go
od
con
dit
ion
?–
Isn
atu
rald
rain
age
suffi
cien
t?–
Ifn
atu
rald
rain
age
isin
suffi
cien
t,h
asa
suit
able
dra
inag
esy
stem
bee
nin
stal
led
?
4.7.
3O
utd
oo
rst
ora
ge
shal
lbe
kep
tto
am
inim
um
.Wh
ere
go
od
sar
est
ore
do
uts
ide,
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ss-
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
ssh
allb
eu
nd
erta
ken
ino
rder
toen
sure
that
ther
eis
no
risk
of
con
tam
inat
ion
or
adve
rse
effe
cto
nq
ual
ity
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety.
A1.
1.1
5–
Are
go
od
sst
ore
do
utd
oo
rs?
–W
hat
isst
ore
do
utd
oo
rs?
–W
hat
rule
sex
ist
for
ou
tdo
or
sto
rag
e?–
Iso
utd
oo
rst
ora
ge
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
is?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
No
haz
ard
anal
ysis
exis
tsfo
ro
utd
oo
rst
ora
ge.
Go
od
su
nd
ero
utd
oo
rst
ora
ge
are
infl
u-
ence
din
aw
ayth
ata
safe
tyri
skis
giv
en(e
.g.u
np
rote
cted
pri
mar
yp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iali
ske
pt
ou
tdo
ors
,bec
om
esm
old
yan
dis
no
tb
arre
dfr
om
use
).
4.8
Pla
nt
layo
ut
and
pro
cess
flo
ws
4.8.
1P
lan
scl
earl
yd
escr
ibin
gin
tern
alfl
ow
so
ffi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts,
pac
kag
-in
gm
ater
ials
,raw
mat
eria
ls,w
aste
,p
erso
nn
el,w
ater
,etc
.sh
allb
ein
pla
ce.A
site
map
cove
rin
gal
lb
uild
ing
so
fth
efa
cilit
ysh
allb
eav
aila
ble
.
A2.
1.8
Form
41,
2,3
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
cro
ss-c
on
tam
ina-
tio
nis
avo
ided
?<w
aste
elim
inat
ion
pla
n>
<per
son
nel
flo
wp
lan
><m
ater
ials
flo
wp
lan
><p
roce
ssfl
ow
pla
n>
<hyd
rau
licp
lan
>
Wh
enth
ere
are
no
flo
wp
lan
san
din
tern
alfl
ow
sd
on
ot
resp
ect
the
seg
reg
a-ti
on
of
pro
du
ctp
roce
sses
(e.g
.se
par
atio
no
f“d
irty
”fr
om
“cle
an”
pro
-ce
ssin
gar
eas
bu
tp
erso
nn
elcr
oss
bo
un
dar
ies
wit
ho
ut
acco
rdin
gp
rote
ctiv
ecl
oth
ing
).
4.8.
2T
he
pro
cess
flo
w,f
rom
rece
ipt
of
go
od
sto
dis
pat
ch,s
hal
lbe
inp
lace
soth
atco
nta
min
atio
no
fra
wm
ater
i-al
s,p
acka
gin
g,s
emi-
pro
cess
edan
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts
isav
oid
ed.T
he
risk
of
cro
ss-c
on
tam
inat
ion
shal
lbe
min
i-m
ized
thro
ug
hef
fect
ive
mea
sure
s.
7.0
A2
A2.
1.8
4,6
–H
ow
iscr
oss
-co
nta
min
atio
nav
oid
edw
ith
infa
cto
ryp
rem
ises
?<p
roce
ssfl
ow
dia
gra
m>
Th
ep
roce
ssfl
ow
allo
ws
for
acr
oss
-co
nta
min
atio
nb
e-tw
een
raw
mat
eria
ls,
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
l,h
alf-
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
san
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 77
4.8.
3In
case
of
sen
siti
vep
rod
uct
ion
area
s,th
ese
shal
lbe
op
erat
edan
dm
on
i-to
red
toen
sure
pro
du
ctsa
fety
isn
ot
com
pro
mis
ed.
–A
reth
ere
sen
siti
vear
eas?
–A
rese
nsi
tive
area
sve
nti
late
d?
–W
hat
add
itio
nal
mea
sure
sar
eta
ken
?
Wh
enve
nti
lati
on
ism
issi
ng
inse
nsi
tive
area
san
da
safe
typ
rob
lem
isg
iven
.
4.8.
4La
bo
rato
ryfa
cilit
ies
and
in-p
roce
ssco
ntr
ols
shal
lno
taf
fect
the
pro
du
ctsa
fety
.
–Is
ther
ea
lab
ora
tory
on
site
?–
Has
the
lab
ad
irec
tco
nta
ctw
ith
pro
du
c-ti
on
pre
mis
es?
–C
anla
bw
aste
(e.g
.lab
was
tew
ater
)d
irty
the
pro
du
ctio
np
rem
ises
?<p
lan
tla
y-o
ut>
<was
tew
ater
dra
inag
esy
stem
>
Wh
enp
rod
uct
safe
tyis
end
ang
ered
thro
ug
hth
ela
bo
ra-
tory
(e.g
.was
tew
ater
,air
circ
ula
tio
n,
was
ted
isp
osa
l).
4.9
Co
nst
ruct
ion
alre
qu
irem
ents
for
pro
du
ctio
nan
dst
ora
ge
area
s
4.9.
1C
on
stru
ctio
nal
req
uir
emen
ts
4.9.
1.1
Ro
om
sw
her
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
pro
du
cts
are
pre
par
ed,t
reat
ed,
pro
cess
edan
dst
ore
dsh
allb
ed
esig
ned
and
con
stru
cted
soth
atp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yis
ensu
red
.
A2.
1.5
–7A
1.1.
1–2
1,2
10–
Are
ther
e“d
irty
”an
d“c
lean
”ar
eas?
–A
reth
ere
app
rop
riat
est
ora
ge
roo
ms?
No
sep
arat
ion
of
“dir
ty”
and
“cle
an”
area
sev
enth
ou
gh
leg
ally
pre
scri
bed
.W
hen
ther
eis
no
com
plia
nce
wit
hle
gal
req
uir
emen
ts.
4.9.
2W
alls
4.9.
2.1
Wal
lssh
allb
ed
esig
ned
and
con
-st
ruct
edto
pre
ven
tth
eac
cum
ula
tio
no
fd
irt,
tore
du
ceco
nd
ensa
tio
nan
dm
ou
ldg
row
th,a
nd
tofa
cilit
ate
clea
nin
g.
A2.
1.5
–7A
2.1.
23 1
–A
rew
alls
mo
uld
y?E
xtre
me
mo
ldb
uild
-up
wh
ich
ensu
esa
con
tam
ina-
tio
nri
sk.
4.9.
2.2
Th
esu
rfac
eso
fw
alls
shal
lbe
ina
go
od
con
dit
ion
and
easy
tocl
ean
;th
eysh
allb
eim
per
vio
us
and
wea
r-re
sist
ant.
A2.
1.5
–7–
Ho
wo
ften
are
wal
lscl
ean
ed?
<cle
anin
gsc
hed
ule
><c
lean
ing
evid
ence
>
4.9.
2.3
Th
eju
nct
ion
sb
etw
een
wal
ls,fl
oo
rsan
dce
ilin
gs
shal
lbe
des
ign
edto
faci
litat
ecl
ean
ing
.
A2.
1.5
–7A
2.1.
22
–A
rew
all-
flo
or
jun
ctio
ns
and
corn
ers
rou
nd
ed?
4.9.
3Fl
oo
rs
4.9.
3.1
Flo
or
cove
rin
gsh
allb
ed
esig
ned
tom
eet
pro
du
ctio
nre
qu
irem
ents
and
shal
lbe
ing
oo
dco
nd
itio
nan
dea
syto
clea
n.S
urf
aces
shal
lbe
imp
ervi
-o
us
and
wea
r-re
sist
ant.
A2.
1.5
–7–
Are
flo
ors
clea
nab
le?
–H
ow
oft
enar
efl
oo
rscl
ean
ed?
<cle
anin
gsc
hed
ule
><c
lean
ing
evid
ence
>
© IFS, October 2012
78 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.9.
3.2
Th
eh
ygie
nic
dis
po
salo
fw
aste
wat
ersh
allb
een
sure
d.D
rain
age
syst
ems
shal
lbe
easy
tocl
ean
and
des
ign
edto
min
imiz
eth
eri
sko
fp
rod
uct
con
tam
inat
ion
(e.g
.in
gre
sso
fp
ests
,et
c.).
A2.
1.5
–7–
Ho
wis
was
tew
ater
dis
po
sale
nsu
red
?–
Ho
wo
ften
are
gu
llies
clea
ned
?<c
lean
ing
evid
ence
><d
rain
age
sch
edu
le>
4.9.
3.3
Wat
ero
ro
ther
liqu
ids
shal
lrea
chd
rain
age
wit
ho
ut
dif
ficu
ltie
s,u
sin
gap
pro
pri
ate
mea
sure
s.P
ud
dle
ssh
all
be
avo
ided
.
A2.
1.5
–7A
2.1.
41
–A
reth
ere
wat
ero
ro
ther
liqu
idp
ud
dle
so
nth
efl
oo
rso
fp
rod
uct
ion
area
s?
4.9.
3.4
Inp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialh
and
ling
area
s,m
ach
iner
yan
dp
ipin
gsh
allb
ear
ran
ged
soth
atw
aste
wat
er,i
fp
oss
ible
,go
esd
irec
tly
into
ad
rain
.
A2.
1.5
–7–
Wh
ere
ism
ach
iner
yw
hic
hp
rod
uce
sa
larg
eam
ou
nt
of
was
tew
ater
loca
ted
?<m
ach
iner
yla
y-o
ut>
4.9.
4C
eilin
gs/
Ove
rhea
ds
4.9.
4.1
Cei
ling
s(o
r,w
her
en
oce
ilin
gs
exis
t,th
ein
sid
eo
fro
ofs
)an
do
verh
ead
fixt
ure
s(i
ncl
.pip
ing
,cab
lew
ay,
lam
ps
etc.
)sh
allb
eco
nst
ruct
edto
min
imiz
eth
eac
cum
ula
tio
no
fd
irt
and
shal
lno
tp
ose
any
risk
of
ph
ysic
alan
d/o
rm
icro
bio
log
ical
con
tam
inat
ion
.
A2.
1.5
–7A
1.1.
13 11
–H
ow
oft
enar
ece
ilin
gs
clea
ned
?<c
lean
ing
evid
ence
><c
lean
ing
evid
ence
>
Cei
ling
sar
eve
ryd
irty
and
dir
tca
nfa
llo
np
rod
uct
.
4.9.
4.2
Wh
ere
fals
ece
ilin
gs
are
use
d,a
nac
cess
toth
evo
idsh
allb
ep
rovi
ded
ino
rder
tofa
cilit
ate
clea
nin
g,
mai
nte
nan
cean
din
spec
tio
ns
for
pes
tco
ntr
ol.
A2.
1.5
–7–
Ho
wo
ften
are
fals
ece
ilin
gs
clea
ned
?<c
lean
ing
evid
ence
><c
lean
ing
evid
ence
>
4.9.
5W
ind
ow
san
do
ther
op
enin
gs
4.9.
5.1
Win
do
ws
and
oth
ero
pen
ing
ssh
all
be
des
ign
edan
dco
nst
ruct
edto
avo
idth
eac
cum
ula
tio
no
fd
irt
and
shal
lbe
mai
nta
ined
ing
oo
dco
nd
i-ti
on
.
A2.
1.5
–74
–C
and
irt
accu
mu
late
on
win
do
wsi
lls?
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 794.
9.5.
2W
her
eth
ere
isri
sko
fco
nta
min
atio
n,
win
do
ws
and
roo
fg
lazi
ng
shal
lre
mai
ncl
ose
dan
dfi
xed
du
rin
gp
rod
uct
ion
.
A2.
1.5
–76
–A
rew
ind
ow
ske
pt
op
en?
Win
do
ws
are
op
enan
dn
oin
sect
gra
tin
gs
are
inp
lace
soth
atp
ests
can
ente
rp
rod
uct
ion
area
san
da
con
tam
i-n
atio
nri
skex
ists
.P
ests
are
visi
ble
.
4.9.
5.3
Wh
ere
win
do
ws
and
roo
fg
lazi
ng
are
des
ign
edto
be
op
ened
for
ven
tila
-ti
on
pu
rpo
ses,
they
shal
lbe
fitt
edw
ith
easi
lyre
mo
vab
le,g
oo
dco
nd
i-ti
on
pes
tsc
reen
so
ro
ther
mea
sure
sin
ord
erto
avo
idan
yco
nta
min
atio
n.
A2.
1.5
–7A
1.1.
15 12
–A
rew
ind
ow
sse
aled
wit
hin
sect
gra
tin
gs?
<pes
tco
ntr
ols
ched
ule
>–
Isin
teg
rity
of
gra
tin
gs
reg
ula
rly
revi
ewed
?<m
on
ito
rin
gsc
hed
ule
>
Win
do
ws
are
op
enan
dn
oin
sect
gra
tin
gs
are
inp
lace
soth
atpe
sts
can
ente
rpr
oduc
-ti
on
area
san
da
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
exis
ts.
4.9.
5.4
Inar
eas
wh
ere
un
pac
kag
edp
rod
uct
ish
and
led
,win
do
ws
shal
lbe
pro
tect
edag
ain
stb
reak
age.
A2.
1.5
–77,
8–
Ho
war
ew
ind
ow
sp
rote
cted
agai
nst
bre
akag
e?W
ind
ow
sw
ith
no
bre
akag
ep
rote
ctio
nar
ein
pro
du
ctio
nar
eas
wh
ere
un
cove
red
and
bro
ken
and
un
pac
k-ag
edp
rod
uct
sar
eh
and
led
wh
ich
ensu
esa
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
.
4.9.
6D
oo
rsan
dg
ates
4.9.
6.1
Do
ors
and
gat
essh
allb
ein
go
od
con
dit
ion
(e.g
.no
splin
teri
ng
par
ts,
flak
ing
pai
nts
or
corr
osi
on
)an
dea
syto
clea
n.
A2.
1.5.
73
–A
red
oo
rsd
amag
ed?
Do
ors
are
op
eno
rd
amag
edso
that
pes
tsca
nen
ter
pro
du
ctio
nar
eas
and
aco
nta
mi-
nat
ion
risk
exis
ts.
Pes
tsar
evi
sib
le.
4.9.
6.2
Bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
sex
tern
ald
oo
rsan
dg
ates
shal
lbe
con
stru
cted
top
reve
nt
the
ing
ress
of
pes
ts;i
fp
oss
ible
,th
eysh
allb
ese
lf-c
losi
ng
.
A2.
1.5.
74
–D
oex
tern
ald
oo
rsp
reve
nt
pes
ten
tran
cein
top
rod
uct
ion
area
s?
4.9.
7Li
gh
tin
g
4.9.
7.1
All
wo
rkin
gar
eas
shal
lhav
ead
e-q
uat
elig
hti
ng
.A
2.2.
11
–W
hat
isth
eas
sura
nce
that
allw
ork
ing
area
sar
ead
equ
atel
yill
um
inat
ed?
4.9.
7.2
All
ligh
tin
geq
uip
men
tsh
allb
ep
rote
cted
by
shat
ter
pro
of
cove
rsan
din
stal
led
tom
inim
ise
the
risk
of
bre
akag
e.
A2.
2.2
1,2
–W
her
ear
efl
yki
llin
gu
nit
sm
and
ato
ry?
<fly
trap
pla
n>
–A
real
lfly
killi
ng
un
its
and
lam
ps
pro
-te
cted
by
splin
ter
shie
lds?
<lig
hti
ng
pro
tect
ors
>
Wh
enfl
ytr
aps
and
ligh
tin
gd
evic
esco
nst
itu
tea
con
tam
i-n
atio
nri
sk.
© IFS, October 2012
80 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.9.
8A
irco
nd
itio
nin
g/V
enti
lati
on
4.9.
8.1
Ad
equ
ate
nat
ura
lan
d/o
rar
tifi
cial
ven
tila
tio
nsh
alle
xist
inal
lare
as.
A2.
3.1
A2.
3.3
1,2,
3,4
1,2,
3,4,
5,6,
7,8
–H
ow
isve
nti
lati
on
revi
ewed
?
4.9.
8.2
Ifve
nti
lati
on
equ
ipm
ents
are
in-
stal
led
,filt
ers
and
oth
erco
mp
on
ents
wh
ich
req
uir
ecl
ean
ing
or
rep
lace
-m
ent
shal
lbe
easi
lyac
cess
ible
.
A2.
3.1
A1.
1.1
A2.
3.3
2,3
14 7
–H
ow
are
air
filt
ers
mai
nta
ined
and
clea
ned
?<m
ain
ten
ance
sch
edu
le>
<mai
nte
nan
ced
ocu
men
tati
on
><c
lean
ing
pro
toco
ls>
Filt
ers
wh
ich
are
no
tcl
eane
das
prog
ram
med
con
stit
ute
ap
rod
uct
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
.
4.9.
8.3
Air
con
dit
ion
ing
equ
ipm
ent
and
arti
fici
ally
gen
erat
edai
rflo
wsh
alln
ot
lead
toan
yp
rod
uct
safe
tyo
rq
ual
ity
risk
s.
A2.
3.1
1–
Isth
eu
seo
fai
rd
uri
ng
pro
du
ctio
nb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–A
reth
ere
pro
du
ctio
nar
eas
wit
hu
nd
er-
or
ove
r-p
ress
uri
zati
on
?
Whe
nai
rsu
pply
caus
esa
con
tam
inat
ion
wh
ich
ensu
ea
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
risk
.
4.9.
8.4
Du
stex
trac
tio
neq
uip
men
tsh
allb
ein
stal
led
inar
eas
wh
ere
con
sid
erab
leam
ou
nts
of
du
star
eg
ener
ated
.
A2.
3.3
1–
Are
ther
ear
eas
wh
ere
larg
eam
ou
nts
of
du
star
efo
rmed
?–
Do
du
stex
trac
tio
nd
evic
esex
ist
inth
ese
area
s?
4.9.
9W
ater
sup
ply
4.9.
9.1
Wat
erw
hic
his
use
das
ing
red
ien
tin
the
pro
du
ctio
np
roce
ss,o
rfo
rcl
ean
-in
g,s
hal
lco
mp
lyw
ith
leg
alre
qu
ire-
men
tsan
dsh
allb
esu
pp
lied
insu
ffici
ent
qu
anti
ty;t
his
also
app
lies
tost
eam
and
ice
use
dw
ith
inth
ep
rod
uct
ion
area
.Asu
pp
lyo
fsu
chw
ater
shal
lbe
avai
lab
leat
allt
imes
.
7.0
A4
A4.
1.1
A4.
1.1
A4.
1.2
1,2
5 1,2,
3,4,
5,6,
7
–W
her
ed
oes
wat
ersu
pp
lyco
me
fro
m?
(Cit
ysu
pp
ly,w
ellw
ater
,tan
ker)
?–
Isw
ater
dem
and
alw
ays
cove
red
?
4.9.
9.2
Rec
ycle
dw
ater
wh
ich
isu
sed
inth
ep
roce
sssh
alln
ot
po
sea
con
tam
ina-
tio
nri
sk.T
he
wat
ersh
allc
om
ply
wit
hap
plic
able
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
for
po
tab
lew
ater
;rec
ord
so
fco
mp
li-an
cete
stin
gsh
allb
eav
aila
ble
.
A4.
1.3
–61,
2,3,
4,5
–Fo
rw
hat
pu
rpo
seis
wat
eru
sed
inth
eco
mp
any
(so
cial
faci
litie
s,cl
ean
ing
pro
ced
ure
s,p
rod
uct
ing
red
ien
t,fo
rw
ash
ing
fru
its
and
veg
etab
les)
?–
Isw
ater
trea
ted
on
site
(wat
erh
ard
nes
sco
rrec
tio
n,c
hlo
rin
atio
n,s
teri
lizat
ion
,fi
ltra
tio
n…
)?–
Are
loca
lleg
alre
qu
irem
ents
on
han
d?
–Is
wat
eran
alys
edac
cord
ing
tole
gal
req
uir
emen
ts(o
wn
wat
ersu
pp
ly,o
uts
ide
sup
ply
).D
ore
sult
sco
mp
lyw
ith
stan
d-
ard
s?<s
ever
alan
alys
isre
sult
s>
Th
ere
isev
iden
ceth
atw
ater
do
esn
ot
com
-p
lyw
ith
leg
alst
and
-ar
ds
and
isu
sed
for
clea
nin
gp
roce
du
res
of
surf
aces
ind
irec
tco
nta
ctw
ith
pac
kag
-in
gm
ater
ialo
ras
in-
gre
die
nt,
or
com
pan
yca
nn
ot
sho
wth
atw
ater
com
plie
sw
ith
req
uir
edst
and
ard
s.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 81
Th
ech
ecki
ng
inte
rval
for
rele
van
tw
ater
safe
tyis
sues
has
bee
ncl
earl
yo
verd
raw
n.
Th
eco
mp
any
has
no
wat
eran
alys
isp
lan
even
tho
ug
hit
ism
and
ato
ryan
dw
ater
isu
sed
for
clea
nin
gp
roce
du
res
or
asan
ing
red
ien
t.
4.9.
9.3
Th
eq
ual
ity
of
wat
er,w
hat
ever
the
con
dit
ion
of
agg
reg
atio
n,s
hal
lbe
mo
nit
ore
dfo
llow
ing
ari
skb
ased
sam
plin
gp
lan
.
7.0
A4
A3.
1.2
A4.
1.1
4,5,
63,
4
–Is
wat
er,s
team
or
ice
use
d–
isa
stat
ion
mo
nit
ori
ng
inp
lace
?<m
ain
ten
ance
><a
nal
ysis
resu
lts>
–W
hat
kin
do
fp
ipin
gsy
stem
exis
ts?
Rin
g-p
ipes
,wat
er-t
anks
)–
Wh
atis
pip
ing
mad
efr
om
?–
Isan
alys
isan
dsa
mp
ling
pla
nb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?
Wh
enco
nta
min
ated
wat
erre
ach
esth
ep
rod
uct
du
eto
bad
con
dit
ion
so
fp
ipin
go
rim
pro
per
pip
ing
mat
eria
l.
4.9.
9.4
No
n-p
ota
ble
wat
ersh
allb
etr
ans-
po
rted
inse
par
ate,
pro
per
lym
arke
dp
ipin
g.S
uch
pip
ing
shal
lno
tb
eco
nn
ecte
dto
the
dri
nki
ng
wat
ersy
stem
,or
allo
wth
ep
oss
ibili
tyo
fre
flu
xto
con
tam
inat
ep
ota
ble
wat
erso
urc
eso
rth
efa
cto
ryen
viro
nm
ent.
A4.
1.3
–6A
2.4.
13,
41,
2–
Isd
rin
kin
gw
ater
syst
emco
mp
lete
lyse
par
ated
fro
mn
on
-po
tab
lew
ater
pip
ing
?<h
ydra
ulic
syst
emla
y-o
ut>
–W
hat
oth
ersy
stem
sar
eth
ere?
(e.g
.use
dw
ater
,co
olin
gw
ater
,wat
eru
sed
for
fire
fig
hti
ng
).–
Are
wat
ersy
stem
sp
rop
erly
mar
ked
and
wh
ere
they
are?
–A
rere
flu
xav
oid
ance
equ
ipm
ents
inst
alle
dw
her
ever
nec
essa
ry?
All
exis
tin
gw
ater
syst
ems
are
inte
rco
n-
nec
ted
,no
refl
ux
avo
idan
ceeq
uip
-m
ents
exis
t,th
eref
or
aco
nta
min
atio
nh
azar
dis
giv
en.
4.9.
10C
om
pre
ssed
air
4.9.
10.1
Th
eq
ual
ity
of
com
pre
ssed
air
that
com
esin
dir
ect
con
tact
wit
hp
acka
g-
ing
mat
eria
lor
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsh
allb
em
on
ito
red
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
-at
edri
sks.
A2.
3.3
4
4.9.
10.2
Co
mp
ress
edai
rsh
alln
ot
po
sea
risk
of
con
tam
inat
ion
.A
2.3.
34
4.10
Cle
anin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
© IFS, October 2012
82 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.10
.1B
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks,
clea
nin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
sch
edu
les
shal
lbe
avai
lab
lean
dim
ple
men
ted
.T
hes
esh
alls
pec
ify:
–o
bje
ctiv
es–
resp
on
sib
iliti
es–
the
pro
du
cts
use
dan
dth
eir
inst
ruct
ion
sfo
ru
se–
the
area
sto
be
clea
ned
and
/or
dis
infe
cted
–cl
ean
ing
freq
uen
cy–
do
cum
enta
tio
nre
qu
irem
ents
–h
azar
dsy
mb
ols
(if
nec
essa
ry).
7.0
E1
E1.
1.1–
31,
2,3,
4,5,
11–
Wh
ois
inch
arg
eo
fcl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
c-ti
on
?<c
lean
ing
sch
edu
le>
–W
hat
kin
dcl
ean
ing
pro
du
cts
and
dis
in-
fect
ants
are
use
d?
<up
tod
ate
clea
nin
gp
rod
uct
san
dd
isin
fect
ant
list>
–W
hat
mu
stb
eo
bse
rved
wh
enu
sin
gd
iffe
ren
tcl
ean
ing
pro
du
cts
and
dis
infe
ct-
ants
?<p
rod
uct
inst
ruct
ion
s>–
Wh
atar
eas
are
clea
ned
and
dis
infe
cted
?<c
lean
ing
sch
edu
le>
–H
ow
oft
enar
ear
eas
clea
ned
and
dis
in-
fect
ed?
–W
her
ear
ecl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
np
roce
du
res
do
cum
ente
d?
<cle
anin
gp
roce
du
res
do
cum
enta
tio
n>
–D
oh
azar
dsy
mb
ols
exis
t?–
Do
esa
con
trac
tex
ist
for
exte
rnal
serv
ice
pro
vid
er?
<ext
ern
alse
rvic
esco
ntr
act>
–C
lean
ing
sch
edu
les
can
incl
ud
eS
SO
P‘s
.
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
no
fp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialp
rod
uct
so
rto
ols
exis
tsd
ue
toth
eu
seo
fin
effi
cien
to
rw
ron
gki
nd
of
chem
ical
so
rin
effi
-ci
ent
clea
nin
gp
roce
du
res.
4.10
.2C
lean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
nsc
hed
ule
ssh
allb
eim
plem
ente
dan
ddo
cum
ente
d.7.
0E
1E
1.1.
1–3
4,5,
12,1
6
4.10
.3O
nly
qu
alifi
edp
erso
nn
elsh
allb
eal
low
edto
un
der
take
clea
nin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
.Th
ep
erso
nn
elsh
allb
etr
ain
edan
dre
trai
ned
toca
rry
ou
tth
ecl
ean
ing
sch
edu
les.
E1.
1.1–
36
–A
recl
ean
ing
per
son
nel
qu
alifi
ed?
<tra
inin
gp
roo
f>–
Ho
wo
ften
are
they
trai
ned
?–
Wh
otr
ain
sth
em?
–A
reth
ese
trai
nin
gs
do
cum
ente
d?
Wh
ena
pro
du
cto
rto
ols
con
tam
inat
ion
occ
urs
du
eto
un
trai
n-
edcl
ean
ing
per
son
-n
elo
rw
ron
gu
seo
fcl
ean
ing
pro
du
cts
or
wh
encl
ean
ing
pro
cess
isin
effi
cien
t.
4.10
.4T
he
effe
ctiv
enes
san
dsa
fety
of
the
clea
nin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
mea
sure
s,b
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ss-
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,sh
allb
eve
rifi
edan
dd
ocu
men
ted
acco
rdin
gto
asa
mp
ling
sch
edu
leb
yu
sin
gap
pro
pri
ate
pro
ced
ure
s.R
esu
ltin
gco
rrec
tive
acti
on
ssh
allb
ed
ocu
-m
ente
d.
7.0
E1
E1.
1.1–
37,
13–
Ho
war
ecl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
nco
ntr
ols
per
form
ed?
<cle
anin
gco
ntr
ols
>–
Wh
op
erfo
rms
thes
eco
ntr
ols
?<c
lean
ing
con
tro
ls>
–H
ow
oft
enar
ecl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
nco
ntr
ols
per
form
ed?
<cle
anin
gco
ntr
ols
>–
Wh
ere
are
clea
nin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
con
tro
lsd
ocu
men
ted
?
Wh
encl
ean
ing
isu
nsu
cces
sfu
lan
dth
iser
ror
isn
ot
corr
ecte
d.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 83
–W
hen
are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
exec
ute
d?
<co
rrec
tive
acti
on
s>–
Wh
oex
ecu
tes
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns?
–W
ho
revi
ews
effe
ctiv
enes
so
fco
rrec
tive
acti
on
s?–
Wh
ere
are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
do
cu-
men
ted
?
4.10
.5C
lean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
nsc
hed
ule
ssh
allb
ere
view
edan
dm
od
ified
,if
nec
essa
ry,i
nth
eev
ent
of
ach
ang
eto
pro
du
ct,p
roce
sso
rcl
ean
ing
equ
ipm
ent.
E1.
1.1–
38,
14–
Wh
enar
ecl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
np
roce
du
res
valid
ated
?–
Wh
oad
apts
clea
nin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
pro
ced
ure
s?–
Ho
wo
ften
are
clea
nin
gan
dd
isin
fect
ion
sch
edu
les
chan
ged
?
Wh
enci
rcu
mst
ance
sh
ave
bee
nch
ang
edb
ut
no
adap
tati
on
sw
ere
mad
efo
rcl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
c-ti
on
pro
ced
ure
san
da
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
ensu
es.
4.10
.6T
he
inte
nd
edu
seo
fcl
ean
ing
ute
nsi
lssh
allb
ecl
earl
yid
enti
fied
.Cle
anin
gu
ten
sils
shal
lbe
use
din
aw
ayto
avo
idco
nta
min
atio
n.
4.10
.7C
urr
ent
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
dat
ash
eets
(MS
DS
)an
din
stru
ctio
ns
for
use
shal
lb
eav
aila
ble
for
chem
ical
san
dcl
ean
ing
agen
ts.P
erso
nn
elre
spo
nsi
-b
lefo
rcl
ean
ing
shal
lbe
able
tod
emo
nst
rate
thei
rkn
ow
led
ge
of
such
inst
ruct
ion
s,w
hic
hsh
allb
eal
way
sav
aila
ble
on
site
.
B2.
2.1–
413
–A
rem
ater
ials
afet
yd
ata
shee
tsav
aila
ble
for
allc
lean
ing
chem
ical
s?–
Are
thes
en
oo
lder
than
two
year
s?–
Are
clea
nin
gch
emic
als
inst
ruct
ion
su
pto
dat
e?–
Ho
war
ein
stru
ctio
ns
tran
smit
ted
top
erso
nn
elin
char
ge
of
clea
nin
gp
roce
-d
ure
s?–
Wh
ere
and
wh
enca
nth
ein
stru
ctio
ns
be
insp
ecte
d?
Wh
ena
safe
tyri
sko
ccu
rsd
ue
tod
efi-
cien
tm
ater
ials
afet
yd
ata
shee
ts.
4.10
.8C
lean
ing
chem
ical
ssh
allb
ecl
earl
yla
bel
ed,u
sed
and
sto
red
app
rop
ri-
atel
y,to
avo
idco
nta
min
atio
n.
A3.
2.2
B2.
2.1–
4E
1.1.
1–3
1,2,
38,
9,10
,12,
141,
9
–H
ow
are
clea
nin
gu
ten
sils
and
chem
ical
sre
cog
niz
able
?<c
hem
ical
slis
t>–
Wh
ere
are
clea
nin
gu
ten
sils
and
chem
i-ca
lsst
ore
d?
<ch
emic
als
sto
rag
elis
t>
Wh
encl
ean
ing
ute
nsi
lsca
nb
em
ixed
up
wit
ho
ther
ute
nsi
lsan
dp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialc
on
tam
ina-
tio
nen
sues
.W
hen
imp
rop
erst
ora
ge
can
lead
top
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
and
oth
eru
ten
sils
con
tam
inat
ion
.
© IFS, October 2012
84 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.10
.9C
lean
ing
acti
viti
essh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut
inp
erio
ds
of
no
n-p
rod
uct
ion
.If
this
isn
ot
po
ssib
le,t
hes
eo
per
atio
ns
shal
lbe
con
tro
lled
asto
no
taf
fect
the
pro
du
ct.
A3.
2.1
E1.
1.1–
31,
2,3,
4,5,
69,
15–
Wh
ere
are
con
tain
ers
clea
ned
?–
Wh
enan
dw
her
ear
eto
ols
clea
ned
?<c
lean
ing
evid
ence
>
Th
eto
olc
lean
ing
pro
cess
isa
pro
du
ctco
nta
min
atio
np
rob
lem
;e.g
.wet
clea
nin
go
fco
nta
in-
ers
and
pal
lets
du
rin
gp
rod
uct
ion
and
nea
ru
np
rote
cted
pac
kag
-in
gm
ater
ial.
4.10
.10
Wh
ere
aco
mp
any
hir
esa
thir
d-p
arty
serv
ice
pro
vid
erfo
rcl
ean
ing
and
dis
infe
ctio
nac
tivi
ties
,all
req
uir
e-m
ents
spec
ified
wit
hin
sect
ion
4.10
shal
lbe
clea
rly
defi
ned
inth
ere
spec
tive
con
trac
t.
4.11
Was
ted
isp
osa
l
4.11
.1A
was
tem
anag
emen
tp
roce
du
resh
alle
xist
and
shal
lbe
imp
lem
ente
dto
avo
idcr
oss
con
tam
inat
ion
.
A2.
4.1
A2.
4.2
1,2,
3,4,
5,6
1,2,
3,4,
5,6,
7,8
4.11
.2A
llcu
rren
tle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsfo
rw
aste
dis
po
sals
hal
lbe
met
.–
Ho
wis
iten
sure
dth
atcu
rren
tle
gal
was
ted
isp
osa
lreq
uir
emen
tsar
em
et?
–H
ow
isw
aste
mat
eria
ldis
po
sed
of?
Wh
enle
gal
req
uir
e-m
ents
reg
ard
ing
was
ted
isp
osa
lare
no
tm
et.
4.11
.3P
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialw
aste
and
oth
erw
aste
shal
lbe
rem
ove
das
qu
ickl
yas
po
ssib
lefr
om
area
sw
her
ep
acka
g-
ing
mat
eria
lis
han
dle
d.T
he
accu
mu
-la
tio
no
fw
aste
shal
lbe
avo
ided
.
–H
ow
oft
enar
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialw
aste
and
oth
erw
aste
sre
mo
ved
fro
mp
acka
g-
ing
mat
eria
lhan
dlin
gar
eas?
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
was
tere
mo
val?
Wh
enw
aste
sac
cu-
mu
late
inp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialh
and
ling
area
sw
hic
hen
sues
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
.
4.11
.4W
aste
colle
ctio
nco
nta
iner
ssh
allb
ecl
earl
ym
arke
d,s
uit
ably
des
ign
ed,i
ng
oo
dst
ate
of
rep
air,
easy
tocl
ean
,an
dw
her
en
eces
sary
dis
infe
cted
.
A2.
4.2
1,4,
5,6
–W
hat
kin
do
fw
aste
exis
ts?
Wh
atw
aste
sar
eco
llect
edin
sep
arat
eco
nta
iner
s?H
ow
are
was
teco
nta
iner
sm
arke
d?
Can
was
teco
nta
iner
sea
sily
be
clea
ned
?–
Ho
wo
ften
are
was
teco
nta
iner
scl
ean
ed?
<cle
anin
gp
roto
col>
Wh
enw
aste
con
tain
-er
sca
nb
em
ixed
up
wit
hp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialc
on
tain
ers
wh
ich
ensu
esa
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lco
nta
min
atio
nri
sk.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 85
4.11
.5W
aste
colle
ctio
nro
om
san
dco
nta
in-
ers
(in
cl.c
om
pac
tors
)sh
allb
ed
esig
ned
tob
eke
pt
clea
nto
min
i-m
ize
pes
tat
trac
tio
n.
A2.
4.2
A1.
1.1
7 9–
Are
was
teco
llect
ion
roo
ms
kep
tcl
ean
?–
Are
was
teco
llect
ion
roo
ms
pro
tect
edfr
om
pes
ts?
<in
teg
rate
dp
est
con
tro
l>
Wh
enw
aste
colle
c-ti
on
roo
ms
are
no
tp
rote
cted
fro
mp
est
inva
sio
ns
and
ther
eis
aco
nta
min
atio
nri
sk.
4.11
.6W
aste
shal
lbe
colle
cted
inse
par
ate
con
tain
ers
inac
cord
ance
wit
hth
ein
ten
ded
mea
ns
of
dis
po
sal.
Su
chw
aste
shal
lbe
dis
po
sed
by
auth
or-
ised
thir
dp
arti
eso
nly
.Rec
ord
so
fw
aste
dis
po
sals
hal
lbe
kep
tb
yth
eco
mp
any.
A2.
4.2
5–
Wh
atki
nd
so
fw
aste
dis
po
salr
eco
rds
exis
t?–
Wh
ois
resp
on
sib
lefo
rw
aste
dis
po
sal?
<was
ted
isp
osa
lreg
iste
r>
Wh
enw
aste
sar
ere
mo
ved
by
un
au-
tho
rize
dp
erso
ns.
4.12
Ris
ko
ffo
reig
nm
ater
ial,
met
al,
bro
ken
gla
ssan
dw
oo
d
4.12
.1K
OK
ON
°5:
Bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,p
roce
du
res
shal
lbe
inp
lace
toav
oid
con
tam
inat
ion
wit
hfo
reig
nm
ater
ial.
Co
nta
min
ated
pro
du
cts
shal
lbe
trea
ted
asn
on
-co
nfo
rmin
gp
rod
uct
s.
–W
hat
kin
ds
of
fore
ign
mat
eria
lmay
be
fou
nd
?–
Wh
ere
fore
ign
mat
eria
lso
urc
esid
enti
fied
thro
ug
hh
azar
dan
alys
is?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>–
Are
stap
les
use
d?
–H
ow
are
con
tam
inat
edp
rod
uct
sh
and
led
?<s
egre
gat
ion
reco
rds>
–W
hat
isd
on
ein
case
of
gla
ssb
reak
age?
<gla
ssb
reak
age
pre
ven
tio
np
roce
du
res>
–W
hat
shal
lbe
con
sid
ered
wh
eng
lass
fixt
ure
sar
ere
pla
ced
?<g
lass
han
dlin
gp
roce
du
res>
Wh
ena
fore
ign
mat
eria
lco
nta
min
a-ti
on
occ
urs
du
eto
lack
of
haz
ard
anal
ysis
or
wh
enfo
reig
nm
ater
ial
sou
rces
are
insu
ffi-
cien
tly
con
sid
ered
.
4.12
.2In
alla
reas
,e.g
.han
dlin
go
fra
wm
ater
ials
,co
nve
rtin
g,w
rap
pin
gan
dst
ora
ge,
wh
ere
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks
hav
eid
enti
fied
the
po
ten
tial
for
pro
du
ctco
nta
min
atio
n,t
he
use
of
wo
od
shal
lb
eex
clu
ded
.Wh
ere
the
use
of
wo
od
can
no
tb
eav
oid
ed,t
he
risk
shal
lbe
con
tro
lled
and
the
wo
od
shal
lbe
ing
oo
do
rder
and
clea
n.
–U
nd
erw
hat
circ
um
stan
ces
isth
eu
seo
fw
oo
dal
low
ed?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>Is
the
wo
od
ento
oli
nu
sein
go
od
and
clea
nco
nd
itio
ns?
–W
ho
insp
ects
and
ho
wo
ften
isth
ew
oo
den
too
lco
nd
itio
nin
spec
ted
?<p
lan
tin
spec
tio
ns>
Wh
enw
oo
dg
ets
inco
nta
ctw
ith
op
enp
rod
uct
.W
hen
wo
od
po
ses
aco
nta
min
atio
nri
skfo
rp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
prod
uct.
Whe
nw
oode
nto
olc
on
dit
ion
isn
ot
insp
ecte
dan
da
cont
a-m
inat
ion
risk
ensu
es.
4.12
.3W
her
em
etal
-an
d/o
ro
ther
fore
ign
mat
eria
ldet
ecto
rsar
ere
qu
ired
,th
eysh
allb
ein
stal
led
toen
sure
max
imu
mef
fici
ency
of
det
ecti
on
,in
ord
erto
avo
idsu
bse
qu
ent
con
tam
inat
ion
.D
etec
tors
shal
lbe
sub
ject
edto
reg
u-
lar
mai
nte
nan
ceto
avo
idm
alfu
nct
ion
.
–W
her
ear
eth
efo
reig
nm
ater
iald
etec
tors
inst
alle
d?
<eq
uip
men
tla
y-o
ut>
Wh
enfo
reig
nm
ater
iald
etec
tors
are
inst
alle
db
ut
late
ro
na
fore
ign
mat
eria
lris
kst
illp
ersi
sts
wh
ich
has
no
tb
een
take
nin
toac
cou
nt.
© IFS, October 2012
86 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.12
.4P
ote
nti
ally
con
tam
inat
edp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
eis
ola
ted
.Acc
ess
and
acti
on
sfo
rfu
rth
erh
and
ling
or
chec
kin
gfo
rth
ese
iso
late
dp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut
on
lyb
yau
tho
rize
dp
erso
nn
elac
cord
ing
tod
efin
edp
roce
du
res.
Aft
erth
isch
eck,
con
-ta
min
ated
pro
du
cts
shal
lbe
trea
ted
asn
on
-co
nfo
rmin
gp
rod
uct
s.
–A
reco
nta
min
ated
pro
du
cts
auto
mat
ical
lyis
ola
ted
?–
Wh
om
ayh
and
le/h
asac
cess
tois
ola
ted
pro
du
cts?
–H
ow
are
iso
late
dp
rod
uct
sh
and
led
?<n
on
-co
nfo
rmin
gp
rod
uct
slis
t><i
sola
tio
np
roto
col>
Wh
ense
gre
gat
ion
do
esn
ot
wo
rk.
Wh
enis
ola
ted
pro
du
cts
re-e
nte
rp
rod
uct
ion
line
wit
ho
ut
pre
vio
us
insp
ecti
on
.
4.12
.5T
he
app
rop
riat
eac
cura
cyo
fd
etec
-to
rssh
allb
esp
ecifi
ed.C
hec
kso
fp
rop
erfu
nct
ion
of
det
ecto
rssh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut
reg
ula
rly.
Inca
seo
fm
alfu
nct
ion
or
failu
reo
fa
met
alan
d/o
rfo
reig
nm
ater
iald
etec
tor,
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
shal
lbe
defi
ned
,im
ple
men
ted
and
do
cum
ente
d.
–H
ow
oft
enar
ed
etec
tora
ccu
raci
esch
ecke
d?
–W
ho
chec
ksd
etec
tor
accu
racy
?<m
etal
det
ecto
rch
eck-
list>
–W
hat
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
exis
tw
hen
ad
etec
tor
isd
efec
tive
?–
Are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
veri
fied
?–
Are
op
erat
ion
ald
efec
tsd
ocu
men
ted
?<d
efec
t/fa
ilure
pro
toco
ls>
Wh
enp
rop
ero
per
a-ti
on
or
mea
suri
ng
accu
racy
isn
ot
chec
ked
and
afo
reig
nm
ater
ialr
isk
occ
urs
.
4.12
.6In
case
sw
her
esp
ecia
leq
uip
men
to
rm
eth
od
sar
eu
sed
tod
etec
tfo
reig
nm
ater
ial,
thes
esh
allb
ep
rop
erly
valid
ated
and
mai
nta
ined
.
–A
refi
lter
san
dsi
eves
or
oth
erte
chn
ical
or
mec
han
ical
syst
ems
like
stra
iner
s,m
agn
ets,
vacu
um
clea
ner
etc.
bei
ng
use
d?
–H
ow
oft
enar
ew
ork
ing
con
dit
ion
so
ffi
lter
so
ro
ther
tech
nic
alo
rm
ech
anic
alsy
stem
san
dsi
eves
insp
ecte
d?
–W
ho
insp
ects
/mai
nta
ins
filt
ers
and
siev
eso
ro
ther
tech
nic
alo
rm
ech
anic
alsy
stem
s?–
Wh
atis
the
con
cern
of
insp
ecti
on
?<m
ain
ten
ance
sch
edu
le>
<mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
em>
Wh
end
amag
eto
siev
eso
rfi
lter
sp
asse
sw
ith
ou
tn
oti
ced
and
this
lead
sto
afo
reig
nm
ater
ial
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
.
4.12
.7In
alla
reas
,e.g
.han
dlin
go
fra
wm
ater
ials
,co
nve
rtin
g,w
rap
pin
gan
dst
ora
ge,
wh
ere
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks
hav
eid
enti
fied
ap
ote
nti
alp
rod
uct
con
-ta
min
atio
n,t
he
pre
sen
ceo
fg
lass
and
bri
ttle
mat
eria
lsh
allb
eex
clu
ded
.W
her
eth
ep
rese
nce
of
gla
sso
rb
ritt
lep
last
icca
nn
ot
be
avo
ided
,ap
pro
pri
-at
em
easu
res
shal
lbe
inp
lace
top
rote
ctag
ain
stb
reak
age.
–D
oes
ah
azar
dan
alys
isex
ist
con
cern
ing
con
tam
inat
ion
thro
ug
hg
lass
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–W
her
eis
gla
ssu
sed
inth
ep
lan
t?–
Ho
wis
gla
ssp
rote
cted
fro
mb
reak
age?
<gla
ssre
gis
ter>
Wh
enn
oh
azar
dan
alys
ish
asb
een
con
du
cted
.W
hen
ther
eex
ists
aco
nta
min
atio
nri
skd
ue
tog
lass
usa
ge.
Wh
eng
lass
isu
np
rote
cted
and
ther
eis
aco
nta
min
a-ti
on
risk
.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 87
4.12
.8A
llst
atio
nar
yo
bje
cts
mad
eo
fo
rin
corp
ora
tin
gg
lass
or
bri
ttle
mat
eria
lp
rese
nt
inar
eas
of
han
dlin
go
fra
wm
ater
ials
,co
nve
rtin
g,w
rap
pin
gan
dst
ora
ge
shal
lbe
liste
din
asp
ecifi
cre
gis
ter,
incl
ud
ing
det
ails
of
thei
rex
act
loca
tio
n.A
nas
sess
men
to
fth
eco
nd
itio
no
fo
bje
cts
on
the
reg
iste
rsh
allb
ep
erfo
rmed
on
are
gu
lar
bas
isan
dre
cord
ed.F
req
uen
cyo
fth
isch
eck
shal
lbe
just
ified
by
do
cum
ents
.
–Is
ther
ea
gla
ssfi
xtu
res
reg
iste
rin
clu
din
glo
cati
on
?<g
lass
reg
iste
r>–
Ho
wo
ften
and
wh
oin
spec
tsg
lass
fixt
ure
con
dit
ion
s?–
Ho
wo
ften
isg
lass
fixt
ure
sre
gis
ter
up
dat
ed?
<in
spec
tio
nre
sult
s><g
lass
reg
iste
r>
Wh
eng
lass
bre
akag
eh
app
ens
un
no
tice
dan
da
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
ensu
es.
4.12
.9B
reak
ages
of
gla
ssan
db
ritt
lem
ater
ials
hal
lbe
reco
rded
.Exc
ep-
tio
ns
shal
lbe
just
ified
and
do
cu-
men
ted
.
–Is
ever
yg
lass
bre
akag
ed
ocu
men
ted
?<g
lass
bre
akag
ere
gis
try>
–W
her
eis
gla
ssb
reak
age
do
cum
ente
d?
<gla
ssre
gis
ter>
–A
reth
ere
exce
pti
on
sto
do
cum
enta
tio
n?
Are
exce
pti
on
sb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
Wh
enn
oh
azar
dan
alys
ish
asb
een
mad
e.
4.12
.10
Pro
ced
ure
ssh
allb
ein
pla
ced
escr
ib-
ing
the
mea
sure
sto
be
take
nin
case
of
bre
akag
eo
fg
lass
and
/or
bri
ttle
mat
eria
l.S
uch
mea
sure
ssh
all
incl
ud
eid
enti
fyin
gth
esc
op
eo
fg
oo
ds
tob
eis
ola
ted
,sp
ecif
yin
gau
tho
rize
dp
erso
nn
el,c
lean
ing
the
pro
du
ctio
nen
viro
nm
ent
and
rele
ase
of
pro
du
ctio
nlin
efo
rco
nti
nu
edp
rod
uct
ion
.
–W
hat
isd
on
ein
case
of
gla
ssb
reak
age?
–W
hat
sho
uld
be
take
nin
toac
cou
nt?
–W
ho
clea
ns
the
pro
du
ctio
nen
viro
nm
ent?
–W
ho
per
mit
sp
rod
uct
ion
con
tin
ual
?<g
lass
bre
akag
ep
reve
nti
on
pro
ced
ure
s><g
lass
bre
akag
ed
ocu
men
tati
on
>
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
nri
skex
ists
du
eto
gla
ssb
reak
age
and
bec
ause
invo
lved
pro
du
cth
asn
ot
bee
nin
spec
ted
.
4.12
.11
Bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,p
reve
nti
vem
easu
res
shal
lbe
inp
lace
for
han
dlin
go
fal
lkin
ds
of
con
tain
ers
inth
ep
rod
uct
ion
pro
cess
(tu
rno
ver,
blo
w,r
inse
,etc
.).
–H
asa
haz
ard
anal
ysis
bee
np
erfo
rmed
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–W
hat
pre
ven
tive
mea
sure
sar
ein
pla
ce?
<pre
ven
tive
mea
sure
s>
Wh
enn
oh
azar
dan
a-ly
sis
has
bee
nm
ade.
Wh
enth
ere
exis
tsa
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
du
eto
mis
sin
gp
reve
nti
vem
easu
res.
4.12
.12
Wh
ere
visu
alin
spec
tio
nis
use
dto
det
ect
fore
ign
mat
eria
l,th
eem
plo
y-ee
ssh
allb
etr
ain
edan
do
per
ativ
ech
ang
esh
allb
ep
erfo
rmed
atan
app
rop
riat
efr
equ
ency
tom
axim
ize
effe
ctiv
enes
so
fp
roce
ss.
4.13
Pes
tm
on
ito
rin
g/P
est
con
tro
l
© IFS, October 2012
88 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.13
.1T
he
com
pan
ysh
allh
ave
ap
est
con
-tr
ols
yste
min
pla
cew
hic
his
inco
m-
plia
nce
wit
hlo
call
egal
req
uir
emen
ts,
taki
ng
into
acco
un
t,as
am
inim
um
:–
the
fact
ory
envi
ron
men
t(p
ote
nti
alp
ests
)–
site
pla
nw
ith
area
for
app
licat
ion
(bai
tm
ap)
–id
enti
fica
tio
no
fth
eb
aits
on
site
–re
spo
nsi
bili
ties
,in
-ho
use
/ext
ern
al–
use
dp
rod
uct
s/ag
ents
and
thei
rin
stru
ctio
ns
for
use
and
safe
ty–
the
freq
uen
cyo
fin
spec
tio
ns.
Th
ep
est
con
tro
lsys
tem
shal
lbe
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
-m
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks.
7.0
E2
E2.
1.1
1,2,
3,4,
6–
Ho
wis
pes
tco
ntr
olo
rgan
ized
?<p
est
con
tro
lpro
ced
ure
s>–
Wh
ich
pes
tsar
eco
ntr
olle
d?
–W
hic
hki
nd
so
fb
aits
are
use
d?
<pes
tco
ntr
olc
hem
ical
slis
t>–
Isp
rod
uct
con
tam
inat
ion
thro
ug
hb
aits
bei
ng
pre
ven
ted
?<b
ait
map
>–
Wh
ois
resp
on
sib
lefo
rp
est
con
tro
l?–
Wh
atis
insp
ecti
on
sch
edu
le?
Wh
enn
op
est
con
tro
lis
mad
e.W
hen
ap
rod
uct
con
tam
inat
ion
can
occ
ur
du
eto
un
map
ped
bai
ts.
Wh
ena
pro
du
ctsa
fety
occ
urs
du
eto
inco
rrec
tu
seo
fp
est
con
tro
lch
emic
als
or
wro
ng
lyla
ido
ut
bai
ts.
4.13
.2T
he
com
pan
ysh
allh
ave
qu
alifi
edan
dtr
ain
edin
-ho
use
staf
fan
d/o
rem
plo
yth
ese
rvic
eso
fa
qu
alifi
edex
tern
alp
rovi
der
.Wh
ere
anex
tern
alp
rovi
der
isu
sed
,th
eac
tivi
ties
req
uir
edo
nsi
tesh
allb
esp
ecifi
edin
aw
ritt
enco
ntr
act.
E2.
1.1
A1.
1.1-
24,
515
–Is
pes
tco
ntr
ole
xecu
ted
by
ow
nst
aff
mem
ber
s?–
Wh
ois
resp
on
sib
lefo
rp
est
con
tro
l?–
Wh
atki
nd
of
trai
nin
gh
asth
ere
spo
nsi
ble
per
son
?<t
rain
ing
evid
ence
>–
Isp
est
con
tro
lexe
cute
db
yex
tern
alse
rvic
esp
rovi
der
?–
Do
esa
wri
tten
con
trac
tex
ist
bet
wee
nse
rvic
esp
rovi
der
and
com
pan
y?<w
ritt
enco
ntr
act>
–W
hat
isth
eco
nte
nt
of
the
con
trac
t?–
Wh
atki
nd
of
trai
nin
gh
asth
eex
tern
alse
rvic
esp
rovi
der
?<t
rain
ing
evid
ence
>
Wh
ena
pro
du
ctco
nta
min
atio
no
ccu
rsd
ue
toin
corr
ect
han
dlin
go
fb
ait
mat
eria
l.
4.13
.3P
est
con
tro
lin
spec
tio
ns
and
resu
lt-
ing
acti
on
ssh
allb
ed
ocu
men
ted
.Im
ple
men
tati
on
of
acti
on
ssh
allb
em
on
ito
red
and
reco
rded
.
E2.
1.1
7,11
,12
–W
her
ear
ein
spec
tio
ns
and
resu
ltin
gco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sd
ocu
men
ted
?<i
nsp
ecti
on
resu
lts>
–A
red
ocu
men
tssi
gn
edan
dd
ated
by
bo
thp
arti
es?
–W
hic
hco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sw
ere
exec
ute
dla
tely
?
Wh
enin
spec
tio
ns
are
no
td
ocu
men
ted
.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 89
4.13
.4B
aits
,tra
ps
and
inse
ctex
term
inat
ors
shal
lbe
fun
ctio
nin
g,s
hal
lbe
insu
ffici
ent
nu
mb
ers
and
shal
lbe
pla
ced
inan
app
rop
riat
ep
osi
tio
n.
Th
eysh
allb
eco
nst
ruct
edan
dp
osi
tio
ned
asn
ot
toca
use
any
con
tam
inat
ion
risk
.
E2.
1.1
8,9,
10–
Wh
ere
are
elec
tric
alfl
yki
llers
inst
alle
d?
<fly
kille
rm
ap>
–A
real
lfly
kille
rsco
rrec
tly
wo
rkin
gan
dco
nn
ecte
d?
Wh
enfl
yki
llers
are
po
siti
on
edin
such
aw
ayth
atfl
ies
can
fall
dir
ectl
yo
np
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialp
rod
uct
s.
4.13
.5In
com
ing
del
iver
ies
shal
lbe
chec
ked
on
arri
valf
or
the
pre
sen
ceo
fp
ests
.A
ny
infe
stat
ion
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
dan
dco
ntr
olm
easu
res
take
n.
–A
rein
com
ing
go
od
sin
spec
ted
for
pes
tco
nta
min
atio
n?
–W
her
eis
this
do
cum
ente
d?
<in
com
ing
go
od
sin
spec
tio
n>
–Is
pes
tp
rese
nce
do
cum
ente
d?
<in
com
ing
go
od
sin
spec
tio
n>
–W
hat
con
tro
lmea
sure
sar
eta
ken
wh
enp
ests
are
fou
nd
?<c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
–W
her
ear
eth
ese
con
tro
lmea
sure
sd
ocu
men
ted
?<c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
Wh
enin
com
ing
go
od
sar
en
ot
insp
ecte
dfo
rp
est
pre
sen
cean
dan
un
con
tro
lled
inva
sio
nen
sues
.
4.13
.6T
he
effe
ctiv
enes
so
fth
ep
est
con
tro
lsh
allb
em
on
ito
red
wit
hth
eh
elp
of
reg
ula
rtr
end
anal
yses
.
E2.
1.1
12
4.14
Rec
eip
to
fg
oo
ds
and
sto
rag
e7.
0B
2
4.14
.1A
llin
com
ing
go
od
s,in
clu
din
gw
rap
pin
gm
ater
ials
,sh
allb
ech
ecke
dfo
rco
nfo
rmit
yag
ain
stsp
ecifi
ca-
tio
ns/
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cu-
men
tati
on
and
toa
det
erm
ined
insp
ecti
on
pla
n.T
he
insp
ecti
on
pla
nsh
allb
eri
skb
ased
.Tes
tre
sult
ssh
all
be
do
cum
ente
d.
7.0
B2
B2.
1.1–
21,
2–
Wh
atg
oo
ds
(in
cl.s
emi-
pro
cess
edp
rod
uct
s)ar
ein
spec
ted
wh
enre
ceiv
ed?
<rec
eip
tch
ecks
>–
Wh
atis
chec
ked
wh
enre
ceiv
ed?
–Is
rece
ipt
do
cum
ente
d?
–W
ho
chec
ks?
Wh
enn
ore
ceip
tch
ecks
are
mad
e.W
hen
chec
ksd
on
ot
gu
aran
tee
leg
ally
req
uir
emen
ts.
Wh
enre
ceip
tch
ecks
do
no
tta
kein
toac
cou
nt
spec
ifica
-ti
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
ta-
tio
nre
qu
irem
ents
wh
ich
pre
ven
tth
atp
rod
uct
sfu
lfilt
hei
rg
iven
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
-ti
on
.
© IFS, October 2012
90 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.14
.2T
he
sto
rag
eco
nd
itio
ns
of
raw
mat
eria
ls,s
emi-
pro
cess
edan
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts
asw
ella
sw
rap
-p
ing
shal
lin
each
case
corr
esp
on
dto
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
(e.g
.pro
tect
ive
cove
rs)
and
shal
lno
tb
ed
etri
men
tal
too
ther
pro
du
cts.
7.0
B2
B2.
1.1–
2B
1.1.
1–3
B1.
2.2
B2.
3.1–
2
3,19
1–19
1 1–12
–W
her
ear
era
wm
ater
ials
,hal
ffi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts
and
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsst
ore
d?
<sto
rag
ep
lan
>–
Ho
wis
cro
ss-c
on
tam
inat
ion
avo
ided
?<p
rod
uct
flo
wp
lan
>
Wh
eng
oo
ds
are
imp
rop
erly
sto
red
and
aco
nta
min
atio
nri
sken
sues
.
4.14
.3R
awm
ater
ials
,pac
kag
ing
,sem
i-p
roce
ssed
and
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
est
ore
dso
asto
min
imiz
eth
eri
sko
fcr
oss
con
tam
inat
ion
.
B2.
1.1–
2–
Wh
ere
and
ho
war
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
and
equ
ipm
ents
sto
red
?<m
ater
ials
flo
w-d
iag
ram
>–
Ho
wis
cro
ss-c
on
tam
inat
ion
thro
ug
hp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
avo
ided
?<m
ater
ials
flo
w-d
iag
ram
>–
Ho
wis
retu
rno
fp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
toth
est
ore
roo
mre
gu
late
d?
–W
hat
kin
do
fst
ora
ge
reg
ula
tio
ns
exis
t?–
Are
pes
tsta
ken
into
acco
un
td
uri
ng
sto
rag
e?A
rep
alle
tslo
cate
dap
pro
xi-
mat
ely
1m
fro
mw
alls
?<p
lan
tin
spec
tio
np
roto
col>
–A
reth
ere
bai
tsla
ido
ut
inst
ora
ge
roo
ms?
<pes
tco
ntr
ols
ched
ule
>–
Are
ther
ese
nsi
tive
pro
du
cts
sto
red
?–
Wh
atki
nd
so
fp
reve
nti
vem
easu
res
are
inp
lace
for
thes
eg
oo
ds?
<pre
ven
tive
mea
sure
s>
Ap
rod
uct
con
tam
ina-
tio
nri
skis
giv
end
ue
tost
ora
ge
of
pac
kag
-in
gm
ater
ials
and
equ
ipm
ents
(e.g
.u
np
rote
cted
exte
rnal
sto
rag
eo
fp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial)
Wh
enst
ora
ge
faci
litie
sar
en
ot
insp
ecte
dfo
rp
est
pre
sen
ce.
4.14
.4A
pp
rop
riat
est
ora
ge
faci
litie
ssh
allb
eav
aila
ble
for
the
man
agem
ent
and
sto
rag
eo
fw
ork
ing
mat
eria
ls,
pro
cess
aid
s,an
dad
dit
ives
.Th
ep
erso
nn
elre
spo
nsi
ble
for
the
man
agem
ent
of
sto
rag
efa
cilit
ies
shal
lbe
trai
ned
.
B2.
2.1–
41–
15–
Ho
war
ech
emic
als
sto
red
?–
Wh
ou
ses
chem
ical
san
dta
kes
them
ou
to
fst
ora
ge?
<res
po
nsi
bili
tylis
t>–
Are
the
chem
ical
su
sers
trai
ned
?–
Istr
ain
ing
do
cum
ente
d?
<tra
inin
gd
ocu
men
tati
on
>
Wh
ena
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lor
ute
nsi
lsco
nta
min
atio
no
ccu
rsd
ue
toin
app
rop
riat
est
ora
ge
con
dit
ion
s.W
hen
ap
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialo
ru
ten
sils
con
tam
inat
ion
occ
urs
du
eto
insu
ffici
ent
kno
wle
dg
e.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 91
4.14
.5A
llp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
ecl
earl
yid
enti
-fi
ed.U
seo
fp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
eu
nd
erta
ken
inac
cord
ance
wit
hth
ep
rin
cip
les
of
Firs
tIn
/Fir
stO
ut
and
/or
Firs
tE
xpir
ed/F
irst
Ou
t.
7.0
B2
B2.
1.1–
2B
2.3.
1–2
18 7
–H
ow
is“F
IFO
”o
r“F
EFO
”en
sure
d?
Wh
eng
oo
ds
are
take
no
ut
of
sto
rag
ew
ith
ou
tco
ntr
ola
nd
ap
rod
uct
safe
tyri
sken
sues
.
4.14
.6W
her
ea
com
pan
yh
ires
ath
ird
-par
tyst
ora
ge
serv
ice
pro
vid
er,t
he
serv
ice
pro
vid
ersh
allb
esu
bje
ctto
IFS
Log
isti
csre
qu
irem
ents
.If
the
thir
dp
arty
serv
ice
pro
vid
eris
no
tce
rtifi
edto
IFS
Log
isti
cs,a
llre
leva
nt
req
uir
e-m
ents
equ
ival
ent
toth
eco
mp
any’
so
wn
war
eho
usi
ng
pra
ctic
essh
allb
efu
lfile
dan
dth
issh
allb
ecl
earl
yd
efin
edin
the
resp
ecti
veco
ntr
act.
B2.
1.1–
21
–Is
sto
rag
ele
ased
tost
ora
ge
serv
ice
pro
vid
er?
–D
oes
aco
ntr
act
exis
t?<s
ervi
cep
rovi
der
con
trac
t>–
Wh
atis
spec
ified
inth
eco
ntr
act?
–H
asst
ora
ge
serv
ice
pro
vid
eran
IFS
Log
isti
csce
rtifi
cati
on
?<c
erti
fica
teco
py>
4.15
Tran
spo
rt
4.15
.1B
efo
relo
adin
gtr
ansp
ort
veh
icle
s,th
eir
con
dit
ion
(e.g
.ab
sen
ceo
fst
ran
ge
smel
ls,h
igh
du
stlo
ad,
adve
rse
hu
mid
ity,
pes
ts,m
ou
ld)
shal
lbe
chec
ked
and
acti
on
take
n,i
fn
eces
sary
.
B1.
1.1–
3B
1.2.
21,
2,3
1–
Wh
atis
chec
ked
bef
ore
load
ing
?<e
xped
itio
nin
spec
tio
n>
–W
her
eis
insp
ecti
on
do
cum
ente
d?
–W
hat
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
are
take
n?
4.15
.2P
roce
du
res
top
reve
nt
con
tam
inat
ion
du
rin
gtr
ansp
ort
shal
lbe
imp
le-
men
ted
(pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
l/n
on
-p
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial/
dif
fere
nt
cate
go
-ri
eso
fg
oo
ds)
.
7.0
B1
B1.
1.1–
3–
May
go
od
sb
etr
ansp
ort
edal
on
gsi
de
wit
hn
on
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lpro
du
cts?
–H
ow
iscr
oss
-co
nta
min
atio
np
reve
nte
d?
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
nca
no
ccu
rd
uri
ng
tran
spo
rt.
4.15
.3W
her
eg
oo
ds
mu
stb
etr
ansp
ort
edat
cert
ain
con
dit
ion
s,b
efo
relo
adin
g,
the
con
dit
ion
insi
de
the
veh
icle
shal
lb
ech
ecke
dan
dd
ocu
men
ted
.
–A
rep
rod
uct
sw
hic
hre
qu
ire
ace
rtai
nco
nd
itio
ns
(e.g
.hu
mid
ity
du
rin
gp
aper
tran
spo
rtat
ion
)b
ein
glo
aded
?–
Are
veh
icle
con
dit
ion
sch
ecke
dan
dd
ocu
men
ted
bef
ore
load
ing
?<e
xped
itio
nin
spec
tio
n>
–W
hat
are
the
pro
ced
ure
sw
hen
veh
icle
con
dit
ion
isn
ot
acco
rdin
gto
spec
ifica
-ti
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
-ta
tio
n?
<exp
edit
ion
insp
ecti
on
>–
Ho
wth
eco
mp
any
ensu
reth
eco
mp
lian
ceo
fco
nd
itio
ns
du
rin
gtr
ansp
ort
?
Wh
enth
ere
are
cert
ain
con
dit
ion
ssp
ecifi
cati
on
sfo
ro
utg
oin
gp
rod
uct
bu
tth
eyar
en
ot
chec
ked
bef
ore
load
ing
and
ah
ealt
his
sue
occ
urs
.
© IFS, October 2012
92 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.15
.4W
her
eg
oo
ds
mu
stb
etr
ansp
ort
edat
cert
ain
con
dit
ion
sm
ain
tain
ing
thes
eco
nd
itio
ns
du
rin
gtr
ansp
ort
shal
lbe
ensu
red
and
do
cum
ente
d.
–A
reve
hic
les
equ
ipp
edw
ith
reg
iste
rin
gd
evic
es?
<reg
iste
rin
gd
evic
es>
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
pro
du
cts
reac
hd
esti
nat
ion
un
der
go
od
con
dit
ion
s?
Wh
enth
ere
are
con
dit
ion
spec
ifica
-ti
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
edd
ocu
men
ta-
tio
ns
for
the
pro
du
ctan
dco
nd
itio
nco
ntr
ol
isn
ot
ensu
red
du
rin
gtr
ansp
ort
soth
ata
hea
lth
issu
em
ayo
ccu
r.
4.15
.5A
deq
uat
eh
ygie
nic
req
uir
emen
tsfo
ral
ltra
nsp
ort
veh
icle
san
deq
uip
men
tu
sed
for
load
ing
/un
load
ing
(e.g
.h
ose
so
fsi
loin
stal
lati
on
s)sh
alle
xist
.T
her
esh
allb
ere
cord
so
fth
em
eas-
ure
sta
ken
.
B1.
1.1–
31,
2,3
–A
retr
ansp
ort
veh
icle
scl
ean
ed?
–W
her
ear
ecl
ean
ing
pro
ced
ure
sd
ocu
-m
ente
d?
<cle
anin
gp
roto
col>
Wh
enab
sen
ceo
fcl
ean
ing
pro
ced
ure
sen
sue
ap
rod
uct
con
tam
inat
ion
pro
ble
m.
4.15
.6Lo
adin
gan
du
nlo
adin
gar
eas
shal
lh
ave
equ
ipm
ent
inp
lace
top
rote
cttr
ansp
ort
edp
rod
uct
sfr
om
exte
rnal
infl
uen
ces.
B1.
1.1–
317
–H
ow
isg
oo
ds
rece
pti
on
org
aniz
ed?
–H
ow
islo
adin
go
rgan
ized
?E
xter
nal
infl
uen
ces:
e.g
.po
llen
,clim
ate,
etc.
4.15
.7W
her
ea
com
pan
yh
ires
ath
ird
-par
tytr
ansp
ort
serv
ice
pro
vid
er,a
llth
ere
qu
irem
ents
spec
ified
wit
hin
sect
ion
4.15
shal
lbe
clea
rly
defi
ned
inth
ere
spec
tive
con
trac
to
rth
ese
rvic
ep
rovi
der
shal
lbe
sub
ject
toIF
SLo
gis
tics
req
uir
emen
ts.
–A
reth
ere
inte
rnal
or
exte
rnal
tran
spo
rta-
tio
nre
gu
lati
on
s?–
Do
esa
con
trac
tex
ist
wit
ha
tran
spo
rta-
tio
nse
rvic
esp
rovi
der
?<s
ervi
cep
rovi
der
con
trac
t>–
Has
sto
rag
ese
rvic
ep
rovi
der
anIF
SLo
gis
tics
cert
ifica
tio
n?
<cer
tifi
cate
cop
y>
4.15
.8S
ecu
rity
of
tran
spo
rtve
hic
les
shal
lb
eap
pro
pri
atel
ym
ain
tain
ed.
B1.
1.1–
319
Are
load
ing
area
ssh
utt
ered
?A
reth
etr
ansp
ort
sse
aled
?
4.16
Mai
nte
nan
cean
dre
pai
r
4.16
.1A
nad
equ
ate
syst
emo
fm
ain
ten
ance
shal
lbe
inp
lace
,mai
nta
ined
and
do
cum
ente
d,c
ove
rin
gal
lcri
tica
leq
uip
men
t(i
ncl
.tra
nsp
ort
)fo
rco
mp
lian
cew
ith
pro
du
ctre
qu
ire-
men
ts.T
his
app
lies
bo
thfo
rin
tern
alan
dex
tern
alm
ain
ten
ance
acti
viti
es.
C1.
1.1–
31–
13–
Ho
wis
mai
nte
nan
ceo
rgan
ized
?<m
ain
ten
ance
pla
n>
–W
her
ear
em
ain
ten
ance
pro
ced
ure
sd
ocu
men
ted
?–
Wh
ich
equ
ipm
ents
are
sub
ject
toex
tern
alm
ain
ten
ance
?
No
mai
nte
nan
cesy
stem
exis
ts.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 93
4.16
.2P
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsan
dp
reve
n-
tio
no
fco
nta
min
atio
nsh
allb
een
sure
dd
uri
ng
and
afte
rm
ain
te-
nan
cean
dre
pai
rw
ork
.Rec
ord
so
fm
ain
ten
ance
and
rep
air
wo
rkan
do
fco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sta
ken
shal
lbe
kep
t.
7.0
CC
1.1.
1–3
C1.
2.1–
21–
13
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
mai
nte
nan
cean
dre
pai
rw
ork
sd
on
ot
affe
ctp
rod
uct
safe
ty?
–H
ow
are
ligh
tin
gfi
xtu
res
rep
aire
d?
–W
her
ear
ere
pai
rw
ork
sd
ocu
men
ted
?–
Are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
nec
essa
ryaf
ter
rep
air
wo
rks?
–W
hat
rule
sar
ein
pla
cefo
rre
-act
ivat
ing
equ
ipm
ent
wh
enm
ain
ten
ance
isco
m-
ple
ted
?<e
xam
ple
sfo
rre
pai
rw
ork
san
dm
ain
te-
nan
ce>
Wh
ena
con
tam
ina-
tio
nri
skfo
rth
ep
rod
uct
occ
urs
du
eto
mai
nte
nan
cean
dp
rod
uct
isn
ot
seg
reg
ated
.
4.16
.3A
llm
ater
ials
use
dfo
rm
ain
ten
ance
and
rep
air
shal
lbe
fit
for
the
inte
nd
edu
se.
B2.
2.1–
4C
1.2.
14,
61,
2,4,
5–
Ho
wis
iten
sure
dth
atm
ater
ials
use
din
mai
nte
nan
ceo
rre
pai
rw
ork
are
fit
for
inte
nd
edu
se?
–W
hat
kin
ds
of
gre
ases
are
use
d?
<gre
ase
list>
Wh
enm
ater
ials
use
din
mai
nte
nan
ceo
rre
pai
rw
ork
sar
en
ot
foo
dg
rad
ean
da
safe
tyri
skfo
rth
eco
nsu
mer
ensu
es.
4.16
.4Fa
ilure
so
fp
lan
tan
deq
uip
men
t(i
ncl
.tr
ansp
ort
)co
vere
db
yth
em
ain
te-
nan
cesy
stem
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
dan
dre
view
edw
ith
avi
ewto
adap
t-in
gth
em
ain
ten
ance
syst
em.
C1.
2.1–
21,
2,4,
5–
Are
pro
cess
ing
inte
rru
pti
on
sd
ocu
-m
ente
d?
<pro
cess
ing
inte
rru
pti
on
s>–
Are
pro
cess
ing
inte
rru
pti
on
sco
nsi
der
edin
mai
nte
nan
cep
lan
nin
g?
4.16
.5Te
mp
ora
ryre
pai
rssh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut
soth
atp
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsar
en
ot
affe
cted
.Su
chw
ork
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
dan
da
sho
rt-t
erm
dea
dlin
ese
tfo
rel
imin
atin
gth
efa
ult
.
C1.
2.1–
21,
2,4,
5–
Are
tem
po
rary
rep
airs
allo
wed
?–
Wh
ere
are
thes
ed
ocu
men
ted
?–
Ho
wfa
stm
ust
tem
po
rary
rep
airs
be
defi
nit
ely
men
ded
?–
Wh
ove
rifi
esth
is?
4.16
.6W
her
ea
com
pan
yh
ires
ath
ird
-par
tym
ain
ten
ance
and
rep
air
serv
ice
pro
vid
er,a
llth
eco
mp
any
spec
ified
req
uir
emen
tsre
gar
din
gm
ater
iala
nd
equ
ipm
ent
shal
lbe
clea
rly
defi
ned
,d
ocu
men
ted
and
mai
nta
ined
.
C1.
2.1–
21,
2,4,
5
4.17
Eq
uip
men
t
4.17
.1E
qu
ipm
ent
shal
lbe
suit
ably
des
ign
edan
dsp
ecifi
edfo
rth
ein
ten
ded
use
.Bef
ore
com
mis
sio
nin
g,
itsh
allb
eve
rifi
edth
atth
ep
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsar
eco
mp
lied
wit
h.
7.0
CC
1.1.
1–3
A2.
1.3
1.2.
31
–A
reeq
uip
men
tssu
itab
lyd
esig
ned
and
wer
eth
eych
ecke
db
efo
rest
art
up
?<s
tart
up
pro
toco
l>
Wh
eneq
uip
men
tco
nst
ruct
ion
can
lead
toa
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lco
nta
min
a-ti
on
.
© IFS, October 2012
94 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.17
.2Fo
ral
leq
uip
men
tan
dto
ols
wit
hd
irec
tp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialc
on
tact
,ce
rtifi
cate
so
fco
nfo
rmit
ysh
alle
xist
wh
ich
con
firm
com
plia
nce
wit
hcu
rren
tle
gal
req
uir
emen
ts.I
nca
sen
osp
ecifi
cle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsar
eap
plic
able
,evi
den
cesh
allb
eav
ail-
able
tod
emo
nst
rate
that
alle
qu
ip-
men
tan
dto
ols
are
suit
able
for
use
.T
his
app
lies
for
alle
qu
ipm
ent
and
too
lsin
dir
ect
con
tact
wit
hra
wm
ater
ials
,sem
i-p
roce
ssed
and
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
s.
C1.
1.1–
35
–A
reco
nfo
rmit
yce
rtifi
cate
so
ro
ther
cert
ifica
tes
avai
lab
lefo
ral
lwra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsw
hic
hco
me
into
dir
ect
con
tact
wit
hp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ialp
rod
uct
s?<c
on
form
ity
cert
ifica
tes>
–A
reco
nfo
rmit
yce
rtifi
cate
sav
aila
ble
for
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsw
hic
hco
me
into
dir
ect
con
tact
wit
hra
wm
ater
ials
,hal
f-fi
nis
hed
or
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
s?<c
on
form
ity
cert
ifica
tes>
–A
reco
nfo
rmit
yce
rtifi
cate
sav
aila
ble
for
con
tain
ers
and
con
veyo
rb
elts
?<c
on
form
ity
cert
ifica
tes>
Wra
pp
ing
san
dw
rap
pin
gm
ater
ials
wh
ich
com
ein
tod
irec
tco
nta
ctw
ith
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lar
en
ot
suit
able
for
inte
nd
edu
sean
dth
eref
ore
asa
fety
risk
exis
ts.
4.17
.3E
qu
ipm
ent
shal
lbe
des
ign
edan
dlo
cate
dso
that
clea
nin
gan
dm
ain
te-
nan
ceo
per
atio
ns
can
be
effe
ctiv
ely
per
form
ed.
C1.
1.1–
3A
2.1.
83 5
–A
reeq
uip
men
tssu
itab
lyd
esig
ned
and
wer
eth
eych
ecke
db
efo
rest
art
up
?<s
tart
up
pro
toco
l>–
Wh
atru
les
exis
tfo
rst
art
up
of
new
equ
ipm
ents
?–
Wer
en
eweq
uip
men
tsim
med
iate
lyco
nsi
der
edin
mai
nte
nan
cep
lan
?–
Do
esan
equ
ipm
ent
inst
alla
tio
np
lan
exis
t?<m
ach
iner
yin
stal
lati
on
pla
n>
Wh
eneq
uip
men
tis
inst
alle
din
aw
ayth
atcl
ean
ing
pro
ced
ure
sar
eh
ind
ered
and
thu
sco
nst
itu
tea
con
tam
i-n
atio
nso
urc
e.
4.17
.4T
he
com
pan
ysh
alle
nsu
reth
atal
lp
rod
uct
equ
ipm
ent
isin
go
od
con
dit
ion
wit
ho
ut
any
neg
ativ
ein
flu
ence
on
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
.
7.0
C
4.17
.5T
he
com
pan
ysh
alle
nsu
reth
atin
the
even
to
fch
ang
esto
pro
cess
ing
met
ho
ds
and
equ
ipm
ent,
pro
cess
char
acte
rist
ics
are
revi
ewed
ino
rder
toas
sure
that
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
are
com
plie
dw
ith
.
C1.
1.1–
34
–W
hat
hap
pen
sin
case
of
equ
ipm
ent
failu
res?
<eq
uip
men
tst
op
s>
Wh
eneq
uip
men
tst
op
sle
adto
ap
rod
uct
safe
tyis
sue
and
thes
ear
en
ot
seg
reg
ated
.
4.18
Trac
eab
ility
(in
clu
din
gG
MO
san
dal
lerg
ens)
7.0
F1
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 95
4.18
.1K
OK
ON
°6:
Atr
acea
bili
tysy
stem
shal
lb
ein
pla
cew
hic
hen
able
sth
eid
enti
fica
tio
no
fp
rod
uct
lots
and
thei
rre
lati
on
tob
atch
eso
fra
wm
ater
ials
and
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
lsin
ten
ded
or
exp
ecte
dto
be
ind
irec
tco
nta
ctw
ith
pro
du
ced
pro
du
cts.
Th
etr
acea
bili
tysy
stem
shal
lin
corp
ora
teal
lrel
evan
tre
ceiv
ing
,co
nve
rtin
gan
dd
istr
ibu
tio
nre
cord
s.Tr
acea
bili
tysh
allb
een
sure
dan
dd
ocu
men
ted
un
tild
eliv
ery
toth
ecu
sto
mer
.
7.0
F1F
1.2.
1–2
1,2,
3,4,
5,6,
7,8
–H
ow
istr
acea
bili
tyen
sure
d?
<tra
ceab
ility
pro
ced
ure
s>W
hat
pro
du
cts
com
efr
om
wh
ich
sup
plie
r?–
Isth
ere
alis
tav
aila
ble
wit
hal
lcu
rren
tsu
pp
liers
?<s
up
plie
rlis
t>
Wh
enn
otr
acea
bili
tysy
stem
exis
tsan
dth
esy
stem
do
esn
ot
incl
ud
era
wan
dw
rap
pin
gm
ater
ials
.W
hen
trac
eab
ility
isn
ot
com
ple
teu
pto
the
sup
plie
r.
4.18
.2D
ow
nst
ream
trac
eab
ility
reco
rds
(fro
mp
rod
uct
ion
site
sto
the
cust
om
-er
s)sh
allb
eav
aila
ble
.Th
eti
me-
fram
efo
rp
rod
uci
ng
thes
ere
cord
sfo
rre
view
shal
lbe
com
plia
nt
wit
hcu
sto
mer
’sre
qu
irem
ents
.
F1.
2.1–
22,
3
4.18
.3Tr
acea
bili
tysh
allb
ein
pla
ceto
iden
-ti
fyth
ere
lati
on
ship
bet
wee
nb
atch
eso
ffi
nal
pro
du
cts
and
thei
rla
bel
s.
F1.
2.1–
22,
3
4.18
.4T
he
trac
eab
ility
syst
emsh
allb
ete
sted
on
ap
erio
dic
bas
is-
atle
ast
ann
ual
lyan
dea
chti
me
trac
eab
ility
syst
emch
ang
es.T
he
test
shal
lver
ify
up
stre
aman
dd
ow
nst
ream
trac
eab
il-it
y(f
rom
del
iver
edp
rod
uct
sto
raw
mat
eria
ls,a
nd
vice
vers
a),i
ncl
ud
ing
qu
anti
tych
ecki
ng
.Tes
tre
sult
ssh
all
be
reco
rded
.
F1.
1.1–
210
–W
hen
was
the
last
trac
eab
ility
test
inb
oth
dir
ecti
on
sd
on
e?<t
race
abili
tyte
stre
sult
s>–
Wh
atp
erce
nta
ge
of
tota
lam
ou
nt
was
trac
ed?
–H
ow
big
isa
lot?
Wh
entr
acea
bili
tysy
stem
isn
ot
test
edin
bo
thd
irec
tio
ns
soth
atn
oas
sura
nce
isg
iven
asto
its
effe
ctiv
enes
s.W
hen
test
resu
lts
are
neg
ativ
ean
dn
oco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sar
eta
ken
.
4.18
.5Tr
acea
bili
tysh
allb
een
sure
dat
all
stag
es,i
ncl
ud
ing
wo
rkin
pro
gre
ss,
po
sttr
eatm
ent
and
rew
ork
.
F1.
2.1–
24,
5–
Can
rew
ork
be
com
ple
tely
trac
ed?
<res
ult
sfr
om
rew
ork
trac
eab
ility
test
>–
Ho
wis
rew
ork
do
cum
ente
d/
Wh
enre
wo
rktr
ace-
abili
tyis
no
ten
sure
d.
4.18
.6La
bel
ing
of
sem
i-fi
nis
hed
or
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
lots
shal
lbe
mad
eat
the
tim
ew
hen
the
go
od
sar
ed
irec
tly
pac
ked
/w
rap
ped
toen
sure
acl
ear
trac
eab
ility
of
go
od
s.W
her
eg
oo
ds
are
lab
eled
ata
late
rti
me,
the
tem
po
rari
lyst
ore
dg
oo
ds
shal
lhav
eb
een
pro
vid
edw
ith
asp
ecifi
clo
tla
bel
ing
.Th
ere
com
-m
end
edco
nve
rtin
gti
me
of
the
lab
eled
go
od
ssh
allb
eca
lcu
late
dfr
om
the
ori
gin
alp
rod
uct
ion
bat
ch.
F1.
2.1–
24,
5–
Wh
enis
lot
lab
elin
gd
on
e?–
Wh
atis
the
lot
lab
elin
gco
de?
<lo
tla
bel
ing
exam
ple
>–
Wh
enar
ela
bel
sap
plie
dto
pro
du
ctu
nit
s?–
Ho
wis
reco
mm
end
edco
nve
rtin
gti
me
calc
ula
ted
?<c
on
vert
ing
tim
eex
amp
le>
Wh
enlo
tla
bel
ing
isd
on
eat
ast
epw
her
em
ixu
ps
occ
ur
wh
ich
un
able
corr
ect
trac
eab
ility
.
© IFS, October 2012
96 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
4.18
.7If
req
uir
edb
ycu
sto
mer
,id
enti
fied
sam
ple
sre
pre
sen
tati
vefo
rth
em
anu
-fa
ctu
rin
glo
tsh
allb
est
ore
dap
pro
pri
-at
ely
and
kep
tu
nti
lexp
irat
ion
of
the
reco
mm
end
edco
nve
rtin
gti
me
of
the
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
and
ifn
eces
sary
for
ad
eter
min
edp
erio
db
eyo
nd
this
dat
e.
F1.
2.1–
27
–Is
asa
mp
leb
ank
imp
lem
ente
d?
4.19
Alle
rgen
san
dsp
ecifi
cco
nd
itio
ns
of
pro
du
ctio
n
4.19
.1W
hen
spec
ified
by
the
cust
om
er,t
he
com
pan
ysh
allm
ain
tain
aco
nti
nu
-o
usl
yu
pto
dat
elis
tin
go
fal
lraw
mat
eria
lsco
nta
inin
gal
lerg
ens
use
dat
its
pre
mis
es(e
.g.s
tarc
has
ag
lue)
,w
hic
hal
soid
enti
fies
allb
len
ds
and
form
ula
s/co
nfi
gu
rati
on
sto
wh
ich
such
raw
mat
eria
lsco
nta
inin
gal
lerg
ens
are
add
ed.
B2.
2.1–
415
–A
real
lerg
ens
iden
tifi
edin
spec
ifica
tio
ns?
–D
oes
alis
tex
ist
that
cove
rsal
lerg
ens
inu
se?
<alle
rgen
list>
Alle
rgen
sar
en
ot
iden
tifi
edan
da
cust
om
ersa
fety
issu
een
sues
.
4.19
.2T
he
man
ufa
ctu
rin
go
fp
rod
uct
sw
hic
hco
nta
inal
lerg
ens
req
uir
ing
dec
lara
tio
nsh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut
asto
ensu
recr
oss
con
tam
inat
ion
ism
inim
ized
asfa
ras
po
ssib
le.
–Is
ap
roce
du
rein
pla
ceto
avo
idco
nta
mi-
nat
ion
of
alle
rgen
free
pro
du
cts?
–H
ow
oft
enis
effe
ctiv
enes
so
fth
ese
pro
ced
ure
sre
view
ed?
–W
her
ear
eth
ese
pro
ofs
do
cum
ente
d?
<exa
mp
les>
4.19
.3W
her
ecu
sto
mer
ssp
ecifi
cally
req
uir
eth
atp
rod
uct
sar
e“f
ree
fro
m”
cert
ain
sub
stan
ces
or
ing
red
ien
ts(e
.g.
star
ch),
or
that
cert
ain
met
ho
ds
of
trea
tmen
to
rp
rod
uct
ion
are
excl
ud
ed,v
erifi
able
pro
ced
ure
ssh
all
be
inp
lace
.
–H
asal
lerg
enst
atu
sb
een
do
cum
ente
din
spec
ifica
tio
ns?
<fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
spec
ifica
tio
ns>
Alle
rgen
sar
en
ot
dec
lare
dan
da
safe
tyri
skfo
rth
eco
nsu
mer
occ
urs
.
5M
easu
rem
ents
,An
alys
is,
Imp
rove
men
ts
5.1
Inte
rnal
aud
its
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 97
5.1.
1K
OK
ON
°7:
Eff
ecti
vein
tern
alau
dit
ssh
allb
eco
nd
uct
edac
cord
ing
toa
defi
ned
agre
edau
dit
pro
gra
man
dsh
allc
ove
rat
leas
tal
lreq
uir
emen
tso
fth
eIF
SPA
Cse
cure
Sta
nd
ard
.S
cop
ean
dfr
equ
ency
of
inte
rnal
aud
its
shal
lbe
det
erm
ined
by
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ci-
ated
risk
s.T
his
isal
soap
plic
able
for
off
site
sto
rag
elo
cati
on
so
wn
edo
rre
nte
db
yth
eco
mp
any.
–D
oes
anu
pto
dat
ein
tern
alau
dit
pla
nex
ist?
<au
dit
pla
n>
–Is
aud
itp
lan
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
is?
<haz
ard
anal
ysis
>
No
inte
rnal
aud
its
are
per
form
ed.
5.1.
2In
tern
alau
dit
so
fac
tivi
ties
wh
ich
are
crit
ical
top
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
yan
dp
rod
uct
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns
shal
lbe
carr
ied
ou
tat
leas
to
nce
aye
ar.
–H
ow
oft
enar
ein
tern
alau
dit
sp
erfo
rmed
?<a
ud
itp
lan
>–
Th
efo
llow
ing
issu
esca
nb
eta
ken
into
con
sid
erat
ion
for
inte
rnal
aud
its:
·al
lpro
du
ctio
nst
eps
(pac
kag
ing
area
,la
bel
ing
,GM
P’s
,GH
P’s
,CP
’s)
·tr
acea
bili
ty,
·co
ntr
olp
lan
(an
alys
is,c
alib
rati
on
)·
do
cum
enta
tio
nm
anag
emen
t(u
pd
ates
)·
man
agem
ent
of
no
n-c
on
form
itie
s(c
om
pla
ints
,in
tern
aln
on
-co
nfo
rmit
ies,
wit
hd
raw
al,r
ecal
l)
5.1.
3T
he
aud
ito
rssh
allb
eco
mp
eten
tan
din
dep
end
ent
fro
mth
eau
dit
edd
epar
tmen
t.
–W
ho
are
the
aud
ito
rs?
<au
dit
ors
list>
–H
ow
are
aud
ito
rsq
ual
ified
for
this
job
?<c
on
tin
ued
edu
cati
on
evid
ence
>–
Hav
eau
dit
ors
any
con
nec
tio
nw
ith
aud
itar
ea?
5.1.
4A
ud
itre
sult
ssh
allb
eco
mm
un
icat
edto
the
sen
ior
man
agem
ent
and
tore
spo
nsi
ble
per
son
so
fco
nce
rned
dep
artm
ent.
Nec
essa
ryco
rrec
tive
acti
on
san
da
sch
edu
lefo
rim
ple
-m
enta
tio
nsh
allb
ed
eter
min
edan
dd
ocu
men
ted
and
com
mu
nic
ated
toev
ery
rele
van
tp
erso
n.
–H
ow
are
aud
itre
sult
sco
mm
un
icat
edto
the
per
son
sin
char
ge?
<au
dit
rep
ort
dis
trib
uti
on
>–
Isth
eco
mm
un
icat
ion
imm
edia
tean
din
tim
eto
take
mea
sure
s?–
Are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
do
cum
ente
d?
<au
dit
rep
ort
>–
Isa
tim
esc
hed
ule
inp
lace
for
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns?
<au
dit
rep
ort
>–
Fro
mw
hic
hau
dit
sw
ere
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
der
ived
?<a
udit
repo
rtco
ntai
ning
corr
ectiv
eac
tions
>–
Ho
war
eau
dit
resu
lts
forw
ard
edto
sen
ior
man
agem
ent?
<au
dit
rep
ort
dis
trib
uti
on
>–
Ho
war
eau
dit
resu
lts
eval
uat
ed?
No
do
cum
ente
dau
dit
resu
lts.
© IFS, October 2012
98 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
5.1.
5It
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
dh
ow
and
wh
enth
eco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sre
sult
ing
fro
mth
ein
tern
alau
dit
ssh
allb
eve
rifi
ed.
–H
ow
corr
ecti
veac
tio
nve
rifi
cati
on
reg
ula
ted
?<v
erifi
cati
on
evid
ence
>–
Wh
ove
rifi
esan
dw
hen
?
No
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
take
nal
tho
ug
hn
eces
sary
.
5.2
Sit
efa
cto
ryin
spec
tio
ns
5.2.
1Fa
cto
ryin
spec
tio
ns
shal
lbe
pla
nn
edan
dca
rrie
do
ut
(e.g
.pro
du
ctco
ntr
ol,
hyg
ien
e,fo
reig
nm
ater
ialh
azar
ds,
per
son
nel
hyg
ien
ean
dh
ou
seke
ep-
ing
).T
he
freq
uen
cyo
fin
spec
tio
ns
inev
ery
area
(in
clu
din
go
utd
oo
rar
eas)
and
ever
ysi
ng
leac
tivi
tysh
allb
eb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ss-
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
san
do
nth
eh
isto
ryo
fp
revi
ou
sex
per
ien
ce.
7.0
A1
A3.
1.2
9–
Ho
wo
ften
and
wh
op
erfo
rms
site
insp
ecti
on
s?<s
ite
insp
ecti
on
sp
roto
col>
–W
hat
isre
view
edd
uri
ng
site
insp
ecti
on
s?–
For
wh
ich
area
sd
osi
tein
spec
tio
ns
exis
t?
No
site
insp
ecti
on
sar
ep
erfo
rmed
.
5.3
Pro
cess
valid
atio
nan
dco
ntr
ol
5.3.
1T
he
crit
eria
for
pro
cess
valid
atio
nan
dco
ntr
ols
hal
lbe
clea
rly
defi
ned
.6.
5A
mec
han
ism
of
chan
ge
con
tro
lwill
be
esta
blis
hed
toen
sure
chan
ges
toth
ep
acka
g-
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety
syst
emar
eco
mm
un
i-ca
ted
and
imp
le-
men
ted
.
5.3.
2In
circ
um
stan
ces
wh
ere
the
con
tro
lo
fp
roce
ssan
dw
ork
ing
envi
ron
men
tp
aram
eter
s(t
emp
erat
ure
,tim
e,p
ress
ure
,ch
emic
alp
rop
erti
eset
c.)
ises
sen
tial
toen
sure
the
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
,su
chp
aram
eter
ssh
all
be
mo
nit
ore
dan
dre
cord
edco
nti
nu
-o
usl
yan
d/o
rat
app
rop
riat
ein
terv
als.
–H
ow
are
tem
per
atu
res
mo
nit
ore
d?
–W
her
ear
ete
mp
erat
ure
sre
cord
ed?
<pri
nte
dm
easu
rem
ent
dat
a>
Inca
sea
leg
alit
yis
sue
occ
urs
du
eto
mis
sin
gre
cord
s.4.
12.4
.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 99
5.3.
3A
llre
wo
rko
per
atio
ns
shal
lbe
valid
ated
,mo
nit
ore
dan
dd
ocu
-m
ente
d.T
hes
eo
per
atio
ns
shal
lno
taf
fect
the
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
.
–H
ow
isit
assu
red
that
rew
ork
sco
mp
lyto
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
tio
ns?
–W
her
eis
rew
ork
do
cum
ente
d?
<mo
del
do
cum
enta
tio
nfo
rre
wo
rk>
–W
ho
revi
ews
rew
ork
resu
lts?
–W
ho
dec
ides
rew
ork
liber
atio
n?
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
rew
ork
fulfi
lsle
gal
lyre
qu
irem
ents
?
5.3.
4T
her
esh
allb
eap
pro
pri
ate
pro
ce-
du
res
for
pro
mp
tn
oti
fica
tio
n,r
eco
rd-
ing
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
of
equ
ipm
ent
mal
fun
ctio
nan
dp
roce
ssd
evia
tio
ns.
–W
hat
hap
pen
sw
hen
afa
ilure
occ
urs
?–
Wh
ath
app
ens
wh
enco
ldch
ain
isin
terr
up
ted
?<m
ach
iner
yst
and
still
pro
toco
l>
Inca
sefa
ilure
sar
en
ot
no
tice
dan
dre
sult
ina
safe
tyo
rle
gal
pro
ble
m.
5.3.
5P
roce
ssva
lidat
ion
shal
lbe
per
-fo
rmed
usi
ng
the
colle
cted
dat
ath
atis
rele
van
tfo
rp
rod
uct
safe
tyan
dth
ep
roce
sses
.If
sub
stan
tial
mo
difi
ca-
tio
ns
occ
ur,
are
valid
atio
nsh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut.
6.4
Pre
req
uis
ite
pro
gra
mva
lidat
ion
will
be
pla
nn
edan
dim
ple
-m
ente
d.
5.4
Cal
ibra
tio
n,a
dju
stm
ent
and
chec
k-in
go
fm
easu
rin
gan
dm
on
ito
rin
gd
evic
es
5.4.
1T
he
com
pan
ysh
alli
den
tify
the
mea
suri
ng
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
dev
ices
req
uir
edto
ensu
reco
mp
lian
cew
ith
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
.Th
ese
dev
ices
shal
lbe
reco
rded
on
ad
ocu
men
tan
dcl
earl
yid
enti
fied
.
C1.
2.1–
21–
13–
Wh
atki
nd
so
fm
on
ito
rin
gd
evic
esex
ist?
<mo
nit
ori
ng
dev
ices
list>
–W
hat
isd
eman
ded
ofm
on
ito
rin
gd
evic
es?
–W
hat
mo
nit
ori
ng
dev
ice
isad
equ
ate
for
wh
ich
kin
do
fm
easu
rem
ent?
–H
ow
are
mo
nit
ori
ng
dev
ices
iden
tifi
ed?
<id
enti
fica
tio
nst
icke
rso
nm
on
ito
rin
gd
evic
es>
–D
oca
libra
ted
dev
ices
exis
t?<m
on
ito
rin
gd
evic
eslis
t>
Th
eco
mp
any
has
no
mea
suri
ng
and
mo
nit
ori
ng
dev
ices
.
5.4.
2A
llm
easu
rin
gd
evic
essh
allb
ech
ecke
d,a
dju
sted
and
calib
rate
d,
un
der
am
on
ito
rin
gsy
stem
,at
spec
ified
inte
rval
san
din
acco
rdan
cew
ith
defi
ned
reco
gn
ized
stan
d-
ard
/met
ho
ds.
Th
ere
sult
so
fth
ech
ecks
,ad
just
men
tsan
dca
libra
tio
ns
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
d.W
her
en
eces
-sa
ry,c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
on
dev
ices
and
,if
nec
essa
ry,o
np
roce
ssan
dp
rod
uct
ssh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut.
C1.
2.1–
21–
13–
Ho
wis
mea
suri
ng
dev
ices
chec
ko
rgan
-iz
ed?
<cal
ibra
tio
np
roce
du
res>
–A
rem
easu
rin
gd
evic
esre
gu
larl
yca
li-b
rate
d?
<cal
ibra
tio
np
roto
col>
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
calib
rati
on
?–
Ho
wis
calib
rati
on
do
ne?
Wh
ere
isit
do
cum
ente
d?
<cal
ibra
tio
nre
cord
s>–
Wh
atco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sar
eta
ken
wh
ena
tole
ran
ced
evia
tio
nis
fou
nd
?<c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
<cal
ibra
tio
np
roto
col>
–Is
calib
rati
on
up
tod
ate?
<cal
ibra
tio
nce
rtifi
cate
>
No
calib
rati
on
isp
erfo
rmed
.
© IFS, October 2012
100 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
5.4.
3A
llm
easu
rin
gd
evic
essh
allb
eu
sed
excl
usi
vely
for
thei
rd
efin
edp
urp
ose
.W
her
eth
ere
sult
so
fm
easu
rem
ents
ind
icat
ea
mal
fun
ctio
n,t
he
dev
ice
inq
ues
tio
nsh
allb
eim
med
iate
lyre
pai
red
or
rep
lace
d.
C1.
2.1–
21–
13–
Wh
atac
tio
ns
are
take
nw
hen
mea
sure
-m
ent
resu
lts
are
un
cert
ain
?–
Ho
war
eem
bar
go
edm
easu
rin
gd
evic
esid
enti
fied
?<i
den
tifi
cati
on
stic
kers
>
Wh
end
efec
tive
mea
suri
ng
dev
ices
are
no
tex
chan
ged
and
asa
fety
issu
een
sues
.(e.
g.d
efec
-ti
vem
igra
tio
nm
easu
rem
ent
dev
ice
e.g
.gas
chro
mat
o-
gra
ph
for
mig
rati
on
test
s).
5.4.
4T
he
calib
rati
on
stat
us
of
the
mea
sur-
ing
dev
ices
shal
lbe
clea
rly
iden
tifi
ed(l
abel
edat
the
mac
hin
eo
ro
na
list
of
test
dev
ices
).
C1.
2.1–
21–
13–
Ho
wis
calib
rati
on
stat
us
of
mea
suri
ng
dev
ice
iden
tifi
ed?
<mea
suri
ng
dev
ices
list>
5.5
Co
ntr
olo
fq
uan
tity
/filli
ng
qu
anti
ty
5.5.
1T
he
freq
uen
cyan
dm
eth
od
olo
gy
of
con
tro
lof
qu
anti
tysh
allb
ed
eter
-m
ined
soth
atth
ele
gal
lyre
qu
ire-
men
tsan
dcu
sto
mer
spec
ifica
tio
ns
or
oth
erle
gal
lyre
qu
ired
do
cum
enta
-ti
on
,or
ifap
pro
pri
ate,
gu
idel
ines
for
no
min
alq
uan
tity
are
met
.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
for
amo
un
tco
ntr
ola
rem
et?
Leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
are
no
tm
etd
ue
tola
cko
fo
rin
suffi
cien
tam
ou
nt
mea
sure
-m
ents
bei
ng
mad
e.
5.5.
2A
pro
ced
ure
shal
lexi
stto
defi
ne
crit
eria
for
com
plia
nce
chec
kin
g.T
his
pro
ced
ure
shal
lals
o,a
mo
ng
oth
ers,
take
into
con
sid
erat
ion
the
tare
,th
ed
ensi
tyan
do
ther
crit
ical
attr
ibu
tes.
5.5.
3C
hec
kssh
allb
eim
ple
men
ted
and
reco
rded
,acc
ord
ing
toa
sam
plin
gp
lan
wh
ich
ensu
res
ap
rop
erre
pre
-se
nta
tio
no
fth
em
anu
fact
uri
ng
lot.
5.5.
4R
esu
lts
of
thes
ech
ecks
shal
lbe
com
plia
nt
wit
hd
efin
edcr
iter
iafo
ral
lp
rod
uct
sre
ady
tob
ed
eliv
ered
.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 101
5.5.
5Fo
rp
urc
has
ed,a
lrea
dy
pre
-pac
ked
pro
du
cts
fro
mth
ird
par
ties
,th
ere
shal
lbe
evid
ence
abo
ut
the
com
pli-
ance
wit
hth
ele
gal
req
uir
emen
ts.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
pu
rch
ased
,p
re-p
acke
dp
rod
uct
sfr
om
thir
dp
arti
esco
nta
inth
eco
rrec
tp
rod
uct
amo
un
t(a
pp
licab
lefo
rre
tail
bra
nd
edp
rod
uct
san
do
ther
lab
els)
?<i
nsp
ecti
on
pla
n>
<dea
ler
evid
ence
>
No
evid
ence
exis
tsth
atp
urc
has
edp
rod
uct
sco
mp
lyw
ith
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
.
5.5.
6If
app
licab
le,a
lleq
uip
men
tu
sed
for
fin
alch
ecki
ng
shal
lbe
app
rove
d.
–A
rem
easu
rin
gd
evic
esin
use
reg
ula
rly
calib
rate
d?
–W
her
eis
calib
rati
on
reco
rded
?<c
alib
rati
on
pro
toco
l>–
Are
ther
eca
libra
ted
mea
suri
ng
dev
ices
?<c
alib
rati
on
cert
ifica
te>
5.6
Pro
du
ctan
alys
is
5.6.
1T
her
esh
allb
ep
roce
du
res
ensu
rin
gth
atal
lsp
ecifi
edp
rod
uct
req
uir
e-m
ents
are
met
,in
clu
din
gle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsan
dsp
ecifi
cati
on
s.C
hem
ical
,ph
ysic
alan
dm
icro
bio
log
i-ca
lan
alys
isre
qu
ired
for
that
pu
rpo
sesh
allb
ep
erfo
rmed
inte
rnal
lyan
d/o
rsu
bco
ntr
acte
d.
–W
hic
hch
emic
al,p
hys
ical
or
mic
rob
io-
log
ical
anal
yses
are
mad
eo
rsu
bco
n-
trac
ted
?<a
nal
ysis
resu
lts>
No
resu
lts
of
anal
y-se
sar
eav
aila
ble
.
5.6.
2A
nal
yses
,wh
ich
are
rele
van
tfo
rp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
afet
y,sh
all
pre
fera
bly
be
per
form
edb
yla
bo
rato
-ri
esh
avin
gap
pro
pri
ate
accr
edit
edp
rog
ram
s/m
eth
od
s(I
SO
1702
5).I
fth
ean
alys
esar
ep
erfo
rmed
by
afa
cto
ryin
tern
alo
ra
lab
ora
tory
no
th
avin
gap
pro
pri
ate
accr
edit
edp
rog
ram
s/m
eth
od
s,th
ere
sult
ssh
all
be
veri
fied
on
are
gu
lar
bas
isb
yla
bo
rato
ries
accr
edit
edo
nth
ese
pro
gra
ms/
met
ho
ds
(IS
O17
025)
.
–Is
ther
ean
anal
ytic
alla
bo
rato
ryo
nsi
te?
Isit
accr
edit
edu
nd
erIS
O17
025?
<acc
red
itat
ion
evid
ence
>–
Are
inte
rnal
lab
resu
lts
veri
fied
by
anac
cred
ited
lab
?–
Wh
ich
exte
rnal
lab
ora
tori
esar
eu
sed
?A
reth
ese
accr
edit
edu
nd
erIS
O17
025?
<acc
red
itat
ion
evid
ence
>
5.6.
3P
roce
du
res
shal
lexi
stw
hic
hen
sure
the
relia
bili
tyo
fth
ein
tern
alan
alys
isre
sult
so
nth
eb
asis
of
offi
cial
reco
gn
ized
anal
ysis
met
ho
ds.
Th
issh
allb
ed
emo
nst
rate
db
yri
ng
test
so
ro
ther
pro
fici
ency
test
s.
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
inte
rnal
anal
ytic
alm
eth
od
sar
eap
pro
pri
ate?
–A
reri
ng
test
sp
erfo
rmed
?<r
ing
test
per
form
ance
evid
ence
>
© IFS, October 2012
102 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
5.6.
4A
test
pla
nsh
allb
ed
raw
nu
pfo
rin
tern
alan
dex
tern
alan
alys
is,b
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks,
wh
ich
cove
rsra
wm
ater
ials
,sem
i-p
roce
ssed
and
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
sas
wel
las
pro
cess
-in
geq
uip
men
tsan
dp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ials
,an
dw
her
en
eces
sary
envi
ron
men
talt
ests
.Th
ete
stre
sult
ssh
allb
ed
ocu
men
ted
.
–D
oes
anin
spec
tio
np
lan
exis
t?<i
nsp
ecti
on
pla
n>
–W
ho
org
aniz
esin
spec
tio
np
lan
?W
hic
hp
rod
uct
sar
een
com
pas
sed
by
insp
ecti
on
pla
n?
(raw
mat
eria
ls,h
alf-
fin
ish
edan
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts,
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
ls,e
nvi
ron
men
talt
ests
?)<i
nsp
ecti
on
pla
n>
–Is
insp
ecti
on
pla
nb
ased
on
haz
ard
anal
ysis
?<h
azar
dan
alys
is>
–W
her
ear
ete
stre
sult
sd
ocu
men
ted
?<t
est
resu
lts>
No
insp
ecti
on
pla
nex
ists
.
5.6.
5R
esu
lts
of
anal
ysis
shal
lbe
eval
uat
edp
rom
ptl
y.A
pp
rop
riat
eco
rrec
tive
mea
sure
ssh
allb
ein
tro
du
ced
for
any
un
sati
sfac
tory
resu
lts.
Th
ean
alyt
ical
resu
lts
shal
lbe
revi
ewed
reg
ula
rly
ino
rder
toid
enti
fytr
end
s.Tr
end
sin
di-
cati
ng
po
ten
tial
un
sati
sfac
tory
resu
lts
shal
lbe
take
nin
toco
nsi
der
atio
n.
–W
ho
revi
ews
anal
ytic
alre
sult
s?–
Ho
war
ean
alyt
ical
resu
lts
veri
fied
?–
Are
tren
ds
inve
stig
ated
?–
Are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
intr
od
uce
dw
hen
resu
lts
are
un
sati
sfac
tory
?<c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns>
Wh
ente
stre
sult
sex
ist
that
do
no
tco
mp
lyw
ith
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
and
no
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
wer
eta
ken
.
5.6.
6W
her
ein
tern
alan
alys
isis
un
der
-ta
ken
,qu
alifi
edan
dtr
ain
edp
erso
n-
nel
shal
lbe
inp
lace
,as
wel
las
app
rop
riat
eeq
uip
men
tan
dp
rem
-is
es.
–W
hic
hte
sts
are
per
form
edin
tern
ally
?–
Wha
tqua
lifica
tions
dola
bte
chni
cian
sha
ve?
<qu
alifi
cati
on
evid
ence
>–
Isan
inte
rnal
lab
avai
lab
le?
–H
ow
isp
rod
uct
con
tam
inat
ion
by
inte
rnal
lab
pre
ven
ted
?
5.6.
7Fo
rve
rifi
cati
on
of
fin
ish
edp
rod
uct
qu
alit
y,in
tern
alo
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts
shal
lbe
carr
ied
ou
tre
gu
larl
yw
hen
spec
ified
by
the
cust
om
er.T
hes
ete
sts
shal
lbe
inac
cord
ance
wit
hsp
ecifi
cati
on
so
ro
ther
leg
ally
req
uir
-ed
do
cum
enta
tio
nan
dre
late
dto
the
imp
act
on
resp
ecti
vep
aram
eter
so
fp
rod
uct
char
acte
rist
ic.T
he
resu
lts
of
thes
ete
sts
shal
lbe
do
cum
ente
d.
–W
hen
and
ho
war
eo
rgan
ole
pti
cte
sts
per
form
ed?
<in
spec
tio
np
lan
><d
ocu
men
tati
on
of
org
ano
lep
tic
test
resu
lts>
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 103
5.6.
8B
ased
on
any
inte
rnal
or
exte
rnal
info
rmat
ion
on
pro
du
ctri
sks
wh
ich
may
hav
ean
imp
act
on
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsaf
ety,
the
com
pan
ysh
all
up
dat
eit
sco
ntr
olp
lan
and
/or
take
any
app
rop
riat
em
easu
reto
con
tro
lim
pac
to
nfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts.
For
exam
ple
,if
anal
ert
syst
emin
form
sth
ata
raw
mat
eria
lso
urc
edfr
om
asp
ecifi
cco
un
try
reg
ula
rly
has
spec
ific
rate
of
dan
ger
ou
ssu
bst
ance
,an
dif
the
com
pan
yis
use
dto
bu
yin
gth
issp
ecifi
cra
wm
ater
ial,
the
com
pan
ysh
alli
ncr
ease
the
freq
uen
cyo
fan
alys
iso
fth
isra
wm
ater
ial,
toim
pro
vem
on
ito
rin
g.
On
the
oth
erh
and
,if
resu
lts
of
anal
ysis
alw
ays
sho
wg
oo
dre
sult
s,an
dif
the
raw
mat
eria
lis
con
sid
ered
asa
low
risk
on
e,th
eco
mp
any
can
dec
ide
tod
ecre
ase
the
freq
uen
cyo
fan
alys
is.
5.7
Pro
du
ctq
uar
anti
ne
(blo
ckin
g/h
old
)an
dp
rod
uct
rele
ase
5.7.
1A
pro
ced
ure
shal
lbe
inp
lace
,bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,fo
rth
eq
uar
an-
tin
e(b
lock
ing
/ho
ld)
and
rele
ase
of
all
raw
mat
eria
ls,s
emi-
pro
cess
edan
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts
and
wra
pp
ing
mat
eria
ls.T
he
pro
ced
ure
shal
len
sure
that
on
lyp
rod
uct
san
dm
ater
ials
con
form
ing
top
rod
uct
req
uir
emen
tsar
eco
nve
rted
and
dis
pat
ched
.
7.0
B2
6.3
Inre
spo
nse
tod
evia
-ti
on
sfr
om
the
pre
req
ui-
site
pro
gra
ms
corr
ec-
tive
acti
on
sw
illb
ed
eter
min
ed.
Co
rrec
tive
acti
on
sm
ayin
clu
de,
bu
tar
en
ot
limit
edto
:–
Pro
du
cth
old
,ass
ess-
men
tan
dd
isp
osi
tio
n.
–E
nsu
rin
gth
eco
rrec
-ti
veac
tio
nis
com
-p
lete
d.
–R
oo
tca
use
iden
tifi
ca-
tio
n.
–P
reve
nti
veac
tio
ns.
–W
ho
qu
aran
tin
eso
rre
leas
esp
rod
uct
s?<j
ob
des
crip
tio
n>
–H
ow
are
qu
aran
tin
edp
rod
uct
sid
enti
fied
?
Wh
enn
op
roce
du
res
exis
tfo
rp
rod
uct
qu
aran
tin
eo
rre
leas
e.W
hen
qu
aran
tin
edp
rod
uct
sg
ou
nch
ecke
din
tofu
rth
eru
sean
da
safe
tyis
sue
occ
urs
.
5.8
Man
agem
ent
of
com
pla
ints
fro
mau
tho
riti
esan
dcu
sto
mer
s
5.8.
1A
syst
emsh
allb
ein
pla
cefo
rth
em
anag
emen
to
fp
rod
uct
com
pla
ints
.–
Ho
war
eco
mp
lain
tsh
and
led
?<c
om
pla
int
han
dlin
gp
roce
du
re>
Ifth
ere
isn
op
roce
-d
ure
for
com
pla
int
han
dlin
g.
5.8.
2A
llco
mp
lain
tssh
allb
eas
sess
edb
yco
mp
eten
tst
aff.
Wh
ere
itis
just
ified
app
rop
riat
eac
tio
ns
shal
lbe
take
nim
med
iate
ly,i
fn
eces
sary
.
–W
ho
po
nd
ers
abo
ut
com
pla
int
sig
nifi
-ca
nce
?–
Wh
od
efin
esth
eac
tio
ns
tob
eta
ken
?–
Wit
hin
wh
atti
me
fram
em
ust
acti
on
sb
eta
ken
?
© IFS, October 2012
104 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
5.8.
3C
om
pla
ints
shal
lbe
anal
yzed
wit
ha
view
toim
ple
men
tin
gp
reve
nti
veac
tio
ns
wh
ich
avo
idth
ere
curr
ence
of
the
no
n-c
on
form
ity.
–W
ho
man
ages
com
pla
int
stat
isti
cs?
<co
mp
lain
tst
atis
tics
>–
Ho
wo
ften
are
com
pla
int
stat
isti
csco
mp
iled
?–
Wh
atac
tio
ns
are
take
nto
avo
idre
cur-
ren
ce?
No
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
wer
eta
ken
alth
ou
gh
afa
ilure
com
esu
pm
ore
freq
uen
tly
or
isco
nsi
der
edas
seri
ou
s.
5.8.
4T
he
resu
lts
of
com
pla
int
dat
aan
alys
issh
allb
em
ade
avai
lab
leto
the
rele
van
tre
spo
nsi
ble
per
son
san
dto
the
sen
ior
man
agem
ent.
–To
wh
om
are
com
pla
int
stat
isti
csd
ata
pre
sen
ted
?<r
etai
ler
com
pla
int
stat
isti
csd
ata>
5.9
Man
agem
ent
of
inci
den
ts,p
rod
uct
wit
hd
raw
al,p
rod
uct
reca
ll
5.9.
1A
do
cum
ente
dp
roce
du
resh
allb
ed
efin
edfo
rm
anag
emen
to
fin
cid
ents
and
of
po
ten
tial
emer
gen
cysi
tua-
tio
ns
that
imp
act
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lsa
fety
,leg
alit
yan
dq
ual
ity.
Th
isp
roce
du
resh
allb
eim
ple
men
ted
and
mai
nta
ined
.Th
isin
clu
des
asa
min
imu
m:t
he
no
min
atio
nan
dtr
ain
ing
of
acr
isis
team
,an
aler
tco
nta
ctlis
t,so
urc
eso
fle
gal
advi
ce(i
fn
eces
sary
),co
nta
cts
avai
lab
ility
,cu
sto
mer
info
rmat
ion
,an
da
com
-m
un
icat
ion
pla
n,i
ncl
ud
ing
info
rma-
tio
nto
con
sum
ers.
7.0
F1
F1.
1.1–
21–
10–
Wh
ob
elo
ng
sto
inci
den
tm
anag
emen
tst
aff?
<ph
on
elis
t>–
Wh
ois
info
rmed
wh
enan
inci
den
to
ccu
rs?
–H
ow
are
inci
den
tsm
anag
ed?
<cri
sis
man
agem
ent
pro
ced
ure
s>–
Wh
atis
anin
cid
ent?
<in
cid
ent
man
agem
ent
pro
ced
ure
s>–
com
mu
nic
atio
np
lan
:defi
nit
ion
of
the
inte
rnal
and
exte
rnal
com
mu
nic
atio
n(i
nth
eca
seo
fin
cid
ents
,pro
du
ctw
ith
-d
raw
al,p
rod
uct
reca
ll),
Wh
ois
allo
wed
tore
po
rtw
hat
tow
ho
m?
Ifth
ere
isn
oin
cid
ent
man
agem
ent
syst
emim
ple
men
ted
.
5.9.
2K
ON
°8:
Th
ere
shal
lbe
anef
fect
ive
pro
ced
ure
for
the
wit
hd
raw
al/r
ecal
lo
fal
lpro
du
cts,
wh
ich
ensu
res
that
invo
lved
cust
om
ers
are
info
rmed
,as
soo
nas
po
ssib
le.T
his
pro
ced
ure
shal
lin
clu
de
acl
ear
assi
gn
men
to
fre
spo
nsi
bili
ties
.
7.0
F1
F1.
1.1–
21–
10–
Ho
wm
uch
isd
istr
ibu
tio
nin
volv
edw
ith
inci
den
tm
anag
emen
t?–
Wh
enan
dw
ho
info
rms
cust
om
er?
<ala
rmp
lan
><p
ho
ne
list>
Aw
ith
dra
wal
/rec
allm
anag
emen
tp
roce
-d
ure
isn
ot
eno
ug
hto
defi
ne
anin
cid
ent
man
agem
ent
pro
ced
ure
.
Ifth
ere
isn
op
roce
-d
ure
for
reca
ll/w
ith
-d
raw
alin
pla
ce.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 105
5.9.
3U
pd
ated
emer
gen
cyco
nta
ctd
etai
ls(s
uch
asn
ames
and
ph
on
en
um
ber
so
fsu
pp
liers
,cu
sto
mer
san
dco
mp
e-te
nt
auth
ori
ties
)sh
allb
eav
aila
ble
.A
per
son
of
the
com
pan
y,w
ho
has
the
auth
ori
tyto
init
iate
the
inci
den
tm
anag
emen
tp
roce
ss,s
hal
lbe
per
man
entl
yav
aila
ble
.
F1.
1.1–
25
–W
hat
kin
do
fin
cid
ent
man
agem
ent
isim
ple
men
ted
?–
Who
isre
spon
sibl
efo
rco
mm
unic
atio
nw
ithcu
sto
mer
s,p
ress
/med
iaan
dau
tho
riti
es?
–Is
alis
to
fim
po
rtan
tte
lep
ho
ne
nu
mb
ers
avai
lab
le?
<ph
on
elis
t>,<
emer
gen
cyp
lan
>–
Wh
ois
info
rmed
wh
ena
cris
iso
ccu
rs?
<ala
rmp
lan
><p
ho
ne
list>
–W
hen
are
med
iain
volv
ed?
<in
cid
ent
man
agem
ent
pro
ced
ure
s>
No
inci
den
tm
anag
e-m
ent
isav
aila
ble
inth
eco
mp
any.
5.9.
4T
he
feas
ibili
ty,e
ffec
tive
nes
san
dti
mel
ines
so
fim
ple
men
tati
on
of
the
wit
hd
raw
alp
roce
du
resh
allb
esu
bje
ctto
reg
ula
rin
tern
alte
stin
g,
bas
edo
nh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
-m
ent
of
asso
ciat
edri
sks
bu
tca
rrie
do
ut
atle
ast
on
cea
year
.Th
issh
allb
eca
rrie
do
ut
ina
man
ner
toen
sure
the
effe
ctiv
eim
ple
men
tati
on
and
op
erat
ion
of
the
pro
ced
ure
.
F1.
1.1–
210
–H
ow
isef
fect
iven
ess
of
wit
hd
raw
alte
sted
?–
Ho
wo
ften
isef
fect
iven
ess
of
wit
hd
raw
alte
sted
?<w
ith
dra
wal
test
resu
lts>
Wh
enw
ith
dra
wal
pro
ced
ure
sar
en
ot
test
edo
rw
hen
test
resu
lts
hav
esh
ow
nth
atth
ep
roce
du
res
are
inef
fect
ive
bu
tn
oco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sw
ere
imp
lem
ente
d.
5.10
Man
agem
ent
of
no
n-c
on
form
itie
san
dn
on
con
form
ing
pro
du
cts
5.10
.1A
pro
ced
ure
shal
lexi
stfo
rth
em
anag
emen
to
fal
lno
n-c
on
form
ing
raw
mat
eria
ls,s
emi-
fin
ish
edan
dfi
nis
hed
pro
du
cts,
con
vert
ing
equ
ip-
men
tan
dw
rap
pin
gm
ater
ials
.Th
issh
alli
ncl
ud
e,as
am
inim
um
:–
iso
lati
on
/qu
aran
tin
ep
roce
du
res
–h
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s–
iden
tifi
cati
on
(e.g
.lab
elin
g)
–d
ecis
ion
abo
ut
the
furt
her
use
(e.g
.re
leas
e,re
wor
k/po
sttr
eatm
ent,
bloc
k-in
g,q
uar
anti
ne,
reje
ctio
n/d
isp
osa
l).
B2.
3.1–
28
–W
hat
pro
ced
ure
sex
ist
for
no
n-c
on
form
-in
gp
rod
uct
sm
anag
emen
t?–
Ho
war
en
on
-co
nfo
rmin
gp
rod
uct
sid
enti
fied
?–
Wh
atru
les
exis
tfo
rp
rod
uct
qu
aran
tin
ep
roce
du
res?
<qu
aran
tin
eti
cket
s>
Wh
enn
op
roce
du
res
exis
tfo
rn
on
-co
n-
form
ing
pro
du
cts
man
agem
ent.
5.10
.2T
he
resp
on
sib
iliti
esfo
rth
em
anag
e-m
ent
of
no
n-c
on
form
ing
pro
du
cts
shal
lbe
clea
rly
iden
tifi
ed.T
he
pro
ced
ure
for
the
man
agem
ent
of
no
n-c
on
form
ing
pro
du
cts
shal
lbe
un
der
sto
od
by
allr
elev
ant
emp
loy-
ees.
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
pu
ttin
gn
on
-co
n-
form
ing
pro
du
cts
into
qu
aran
tin
e?<q
uar
anti
ne
tick
ets>
–W
ho
may
rele
ase
qu
aran
tin
edp
rod
uct
s?<q
uar
anti
ne
tick
ets>
–H
ow
isit
ensu
red
that
on
lyau
tho
rize
dp
erso
ns
rele
ase
qu
aran
tin
edp
rod
uct
s?<q
uar
anti
ne
tick
ets>
Wh
enem
plo
yees
do
no
tkn
ow
wh
ois
auth
ori
zed
tore
leas
eq
uar
anti
ned
pro
du
cts
or
wh
enth
ep
rod
uct
sar
ein
con
dit
ion
sto
be
rele
ased
or
wh
enp
rod
uct
sar
eq
uar
an-
tin
edan
da
safe
tyis
sue
occ
urs
.
© IFS, October 2012
106 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
5.10
.3W
her
en
on
-co
nfo
rmit
ies
are
pre
sen
t,im
med
iate
corr
ecti
on
ssh
allb
eta
ken
toen
sure
that
pro
du
ctre
qu
irem
ents
are
com
plie
dw
ith
.
B2.
3.1–
28,
9,10
–W
hat
pro
ced
ure
sar
eim
ple
men
ted
wit
hn
on
-co
nfo
rmin
gp
rod
uct
s?<q
uar
anti
ne
tick
ets>
–W
ho
dec
ides
abo
ut
no
n-c
on
form
ing
pro
du
cts?
<qu
aran
tin
eti
cket
s>
5.10
.4O
ut
of
spec
ifica
tio
nfi
nis
hed
go
od
so
rfi
nis
hed
go
od
sth
atd
on
ot
mee
to
ther
leg
alre
qu
irem
ents
are
no
tal
low
edto
be
pu
to
nth
em
arke
t.T
he
mat
eria
lhas
tob
ed
estr
oye
dap
pro
-p
riat
ely.
Exc
epti
on
ssh
allb
eag
reed
inw
riti
ng
wit
hth
eco
ntr
act
par
tner
s.
B2.
3.1–
211
,12
For
exam
ple
,evi
den
ces
can
be
pro
vid
edto
sho
wth
atp
rod
uct
sh
ave
no
tb
een
pla
ced
on
the
mar
ket
(e.g
.co
ntr
acts
wit
hex
tern
alw
aste
des
tro
yin
gse
rvic
ep
rovi
der
s).
Exc
epti
on
sca
nb
ech
ecke
dw
ith
exam
ple
s(s
itu
atio
ns
wh
ich
alre
ady
occ
urr
ed),
by
chec
kin
gth
eco
nte
nt
of
the
con
trac
t.
5.11
Co
rrec
tive
acti
on
s–
Inca
seo
fa
ren
ewal
aud
it:w
ere
the
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
of
the
pre
vio
us
IFS
aud
itap
plie
d?
5.11
.1A
pro
ced
ure
shal
lbe
inp
lace
for
the
reco
rdin
gan
dan
alys
iso
fth
en
on
-co
nfo
rmit
ies
wit
hth
eo
bje
ctiv
eto
avo
idre
curr
ence
sb
yp
reve
nti
veac
tio
ns
and
/or
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns.
–W
hat
are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
pro
ced
ure
s?<c
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
pro
ced
ure
s>N
oco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sp
roce
du
res
exis
t.
5.11
.2K
OK
ON
°9:
Co
rrec
tive
acti
on
ssh
allb
ecl
earl
yfo
rmu
late
d,d
ocu
men
ted
and
un
der
take
n,a
sso
on
asp
oss
ible
toav
oid
furt
her
occ
urr
ence
of
no
n-
con
form
ity.
Th
ere
spo
nsi
bili
ties
and
the
tim
esca
les
for
corr
ecti
veac
tio
nsh
allb
ecl
earl
yd
efin
ed.T
he
do
cu-
men
tati
on
shal
lbe
secu
rely
sto
red
,an
dea
sily
acce
ssib
le.
6,3
Inre
spo
nse
tod
evia
-ti
on
sfr
om
the
pre
req
ui-
site
pro
gra
ms
corr
ec-
tive
acti
on
sw
illb
ed
eter
min
ed.
Co
rrec
tive
acti
on
sm
ayin
clu
de,
bu
tar
en
ot
limit
edto
:–
Pro
du
cth
old
,ass
ess-
men
tan
dd
isp
osi
tio
n.
–E
nsu
rin
gth
eco
rrec
-ti
veac
tio
nis
com
-p
lete
d.
–R
oo
tca
use
iden
tifi
ca-
tio
n.
–P
reve
nti
veac
tio
ns.
–W
hic
hco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sw
ere
imp
le-
men
ted
?<m
od
elco
rrec
tive
acti
on
pro
ced
ure
s>–
Wh
ere
are
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
do
cu-
men
ted
?<m
od
elco
rrec
tive
acti
on
pro
ced
ure
s>
–W
ho
isre
spo
nsi
ble
for
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns?
<mo
del
corr
ecti
veac
tio
np
roce
du
res
>–
Ho
wlo
ng
may
itta
keto
imp
lem
ent
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns?
<mo
del
corr
ecti
veac
tio
np
roce
du
res
>
No
corr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
are
take
n.
Co
rrec
tive
acti
on
sar
en
ot
imp
lem
ente
dw
ith
ina
sho
rtti
me
span
.C
orr
ecti
veac
tio
ns
are
no
td
ocu
men
ted
No
resp
on
sib
iliti
esar
eas
sig
ned
toim
ple
men
tco
rrec
tive
acti
on
s.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 107
5.11
.3T
he
per
form
ance
of
the
imp
lem
ente
dco
rrec
tive
acti
on
ssh
allb
ed
ocu
-m
ente
dan
dth
eef
fect
iven
ess
shal
lb
ech
ecke
d.
–W
her
ear
eco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sd
ocu
men
ted
?<m
od
elco
rrec
tive
acti
on
pro
ced
ure
s>–
Ho
war
eco
rrec
tive
acti
on
sve
rifi
ed?
<mo
del
wit
hve
rifi
edco
rrec
tive
acti
on
pro
ced
ure
s>
Co
rrec
tive
acti
on
sar
en
ot
do
cum
ente
dan
d/r
veri
fied
.
6P
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
se/F
oo
dd
efen
sean
dex
tern
alin
spec
tio
ns
6.1
Def
ense
asse
ssm
ent
6.1.
1R
esp
on
sib
iliti
esfo
rp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sesh
allb
ecl
earl
yd
efin
ed.T
ho
sere
spo
nsi
ble
shal
lbe
key
staf
fo
rsh
allh
ave
acce
ssto
the
top
man
agem
ent
team
.Su
ffici
ent
kno
wle
dg
ein
this
area
shal
lbe
dem
on
stra
ted
.
–W
ho
has
the
acco
un
tab
ility
for
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ldef
ense
pro
gra
m?
–W
hat
are
the
com
pet
ence
and
qu
alifi
ca-
tio
ns
dem
on
stra
ted
for
the
per
son
(s)
resp
on
sib
lefo
rth
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
def
ense
pro
gra
m?
–W
hat
isth
ep
osi
tio
no
fth
ep
erso
n(s
)re
spo
nsi
ble
for
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ld
efen
sep
rog
ram
wit
hre
spec
tto
the
man
agem
ent
team
?–
Ho
wd
om
anag
emen
tte
ams
sup
po
rtth
ep
erso
n(s
)re
spo
nsi
ble
for
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ldef
ense
pro
gra
m?
–W
her
ear
eth
ere
spo
nsi
bili
ties
clea
rly
defi
ned
?–
Was
this
com
mu
nic
ated
toth
em
emb
ers
of
the
com
pan
y?H
ow
?
© IFS, October 2012
108 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
6.1.
2A
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ldef
ense
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ssm
ent
of
asso
ci-
ated
risk
ssh
allh
ave
bee
np
erfo
rmed
and
do
cum
ente
d.B
ased
on
this
asse
ssm
ent,
and
bas
edo
nth
ele
gal
req
uir
emen
ts,a
reas
crit
ical
tose
curi
tysh
allb
eid
enti
fied
.P
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
seh
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
-at
edri
sks
shal
lbe
con
du
cted
ann
ual
lyo
ru
po
nch
ang
esth
ataf
fect
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
lin
teg
rity
.A
nap
pro
pri
ate
aler
tsy
stem
shal
lbe
defi
ned
and
per
iod
ical
lyte
sted
for
effe
ctiv
enes
s.
–W
hat
are
the
leg
al/c
ust
om
erp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sere
qu
irem
ents
app
licab
leto
the
com
pan
y?–
Ho
wca
nth
eco
mp
any
dem
on
stra
teco
mp
lian
cew
ith
such
req
uir
emen
ts?
–W
hat
isth
ep
roce
ss/p
roce
du
reu
sed
top
erfo
rmth
eh
azar
dan
alyi
sis
and
asse
ss-
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s?–
Isth
eh
azar
dan
alys
isin
line
wit
hle
gal
and
/or
cust
om
ern
eed
san
d/o
rex
pec
ta-
tio
ns?
–H
ow
do
the
syst
ems
assi
stth
eco
mp
any
toid
enti
fycr
itic
alo
rh
igh
risk
area
s?–
Ho
wo
ften
isa
revi
ewo
fth
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sep
rog
ram
per
form
ed?
–W
hat
crit
eria
do
esth
eco
mp
any
con
sid
erin
ord
erto
det
erm
ine
the
freq
uen
cyto
per
form
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
,if
isn
ot
do
ne
ann
ual
ly?
–H
ow
isth
eco
mp
any
aler
ted
of
any
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ldef
ense
bre
ach
?–
Ho
wd
oes
the
com
pan
yev
alu
ate
the
effe
ctiv
enes
so
fth
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
def
ense
pro
gra
m?
6.1.
3If
leg
isla
tio
nm
akes
reg
istr
atio
no
ro
n-s
ite
insp
ecti
on
sn
eces
sary
,ev
iden
cesh
allb
ep
rovi
ded
.
–W
hat
are
the
leg
al/c
ust
om
erp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sere
qu
irem
ents
app
licab
leto
the
com
pan
y?–
Bas
edo
nle
gal
req
uir
emen
tsin
the
cou
ntr
yw
her
eth
ep
lan
tis
loca
ted
or
by
the
cou
ntr
yw
her
eth
ep
rod
uct
isco
n-
sum
ed,i
sit
req
uir
edto
app
lyfo
rfo
rmal
reg
istr
atio
n?
–If
reg
istr
atio
nis
req
uir
ed,w
ho
has
this
info
rmat
ion
?C
ou
ldth
eco
mp
any
dem
on
-st
rate
com
plia
nce
?–
Isth
ere
any
req
uir
emen
tfo
rp
erio
dic
insp
ecti
on
?If
yes,
then
:–
Wh
op
erfo
rms
it?
–A
gai
nst
wh
atst
and
ard
?
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 109
–W
hen
was
the
last
insp
ecti
on
?–
Wh
atw
asth
ere
sult
of
the
insp
ecti
on
?–
Isit
req
uir
edto
pro
vid
eev
iden
ceth
atd
evia
tio
ns
hav
eb
een
solv
ed?
(co
rrec
tive
acti
on
s)–
Wh
atar
eth
eim
plic
atio
ns
ifa
maj
or
bre
ach
isid
enti
fied
?
6.2
Sit
eS
ecu
rity
6.2.
1B
ased
on
ah
azar
dan
alys
isan
das
sess
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,id
enti
fied
area
scr
itic
alto
secu
rity
shal
lbe
adeq
uat
ely
pro
tect
edto
pre
ven
tu
nau
tho
rize
dac
cess
.A
cces
sp
oin
tssh
allb
eco
ntr
olle
d.
–B
ased
on
the
haz
ard
anal
ysis
and
asse
ss-
men
to
fas
soci
ated
risk
s,w
hat
area
sh
ave
bee
nid
enti
fied
ascr
itic
al?
–W
hat
con
tro
lmea
sure
sar
ein
pla
cein
ord
erto
con
tro
lth
een
tran
ceto
tho
sear
eas?
–H
ow
do
esth
eco
mp
any
mai
nta
inco
ntr
ol
ove
rw
ho
ente
rsto
the
pre
mis
esan
dcr
itic
alar
eas?
–W
hat
are
the
acce
ssco
ntr
ols
app
licab
leto
the
follo
win
gp
eop
le?
–Te
mp
ora
ryem
plo
yees
–C
on
trac
tors
–V
isit
ors
–E
mp
loye
es–
Car
rier
dri
vers
Un
auth
ori
zed
per
-so
ns
free
lyen
ter
pro
du
ctio
no
rst
ora
ge
area
sso
that
asa
fety
risk
occ
urs
.
6.2.
2P
roce
du
res
shal
lbe
inp
lace
top
reve
nt
tam
per
ing
and
/or
allo
wid
enti
fica
tio
no
fsi
gn
so
fta
mp
erin
g.
–D
oes
the
com
pan
yd
efin
ep
roce
du
res
toid
enti
fyta
mp
erin
go
fra
wm
ater
ials
,W
ork
sin
Pro
cess
(WIP
)an
dfi
nal
go
od
s?–
Are
ther
em
ean
sto
veri
fyif
pro
du
cts
hav
eb
een
tam
per
ed?
–A
reem
plo
yees
trai
ned
inth
eid
enti
fica
-ti
on
of
tam
per
edp
rod
uct
s?–
Do
esth
ed
esig
no
fp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
incl
ud
eth
eid
enti
fica
tio
no
fta
mp
erev
iden
tm
easu
res?
Isit
req
uir
edb
yla
win
the
cou
ntr
yo
fo
rig
ino
rd
esti
nat
ion
?–
Are
ther
ete
sts
tove
rify
that
mea
sure
sag
ain
stta
mp
erin
gar
ep
rop
erly
app
lied
and
wo
rkin
gp
rop
erly
?
6.3
Per
son
nel
&V
isit
or
Sec
uri
ty
© IFS, October 2012
110 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
IFS
PAC
secu
ren
um
ber
IFS
PAC
secu
rere
qu
irem
ent
Co
nn
ec-
tio
nw
ith
PAC
secu
reP
Pre
quir
e-m
ent
nu
mb
er
Text
/Nu
mb
ero
fco
nn
ecte
dPA
Cse
cure
PP
(Pre
req
uis
ite
Pro
gra
m)
req
uir
emen
t
Wh
atto
chec
k?W
hat
sho
uld
be
aske
d?
Exa
mp
lefo
rK
O/M
ajo
r
6.3.
1V
isit
or
po
licy
shal
lco
nta
inas
pec
tso
fp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sep
lan
.D
eliv
ery
and
load
ing
staf
fin
con
tact
wit
hth
ep
rod
uct
shal
lbe
iden
tifi
edan
dsh
allr
esp
ect
the
acce
ssru
les
of
the
com
pan
y.V
isit
ors
and
exte
rnal
serv
ice
pro
vid
ers
shal
lbe
iden
tifi
edin
area
sw
ith
pro
du
ctst
ora
ge
and
shal
lbe
reg
iste
red
atth
eti
me
of
acce
ss.T
hey
sho
uld
be
info
rmed
abo
ut
the
site
po
licie
san
dth
eir
acce
ssco
ntr
olle
dac
cord
ing
ly.
–D
ovi
sito
r/co
ntr
acto
rac
cess
po
licie
sin
-cl
ud
eco
ntr
ols
toav
oid
that
no
mem
ber
so
fth
eco
mp
any
are
able
tom
ove
free
lyw
ith
ou
tes
cort
sin
sid
eth
ep
rem
ises
?–
Are
visi
tors
and
con
trac
tors
info
rmed
of
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ldef
ense
rule
san
dth
eir
sco
pe
wh
ilein
sid
eco
mp
any
pre
m-
ises
?–
Do
esth
eco
mp
any
hav
ed
efin
edm
ean
sto
ensu
reth
atco
ntr
acto
rsw
ho
will
spen
da
lon
gti
me
insi
de
the
pla
nts
are
pro
per
lyid
enti
fied
,su
per
vise
dan
des
cort
edin
sid
ecr
itic
alar
eas?
–A
reth
ere
con
tro
lsto
ensu
reth
atth
eac
cess
for
tru
ckd
rive
rsw
ho
load
or
un
load
pro
du
cts/
mat
eria
lsis
rest
rict
edto
defi
ned
area
sin
sid
ean
do
uts
ide
the
bu
ild-
ing
and
com
pan
yp
rem
ises
?A
reth
ere
mea
ns
tow
atch
the
mo
vem
ents
of
no
n-e
mp
loye
eso
nce
they
ente
rco
mp
any
pre
mis
es?
(E.g
.cam
eras
or
gu
ard
sat
defi
ned
area
s?O
ther
pro
ced
ure
s?)
–If
con
trac
tors
and
visi
tors
are
pro
vid
edw
ith
acce
sske
ys,a
reth
ose
keys
pro
-g
ram
med
tolim
itth
eac
cess
tosp
ecifi
edan
dse
lect
edar
eas?
–If
esco
rts
are
req
uir
edto
gu
ide
visi
tors
and
con
trac
tors
atal
ltim
es,a
reth
ere
arra
ng
e-m
ents
toh
ave
defi
ned
gu
ides
atal
lsh
ifts
?–
Are
secu
rity
/gu
ard
saw
are
of
ho
wto
dea
lin
case
sw
her
eth
ere
are
no
esco
rts
avai
lab
leat
any
par
ticu
lar
mo
men
t?
6.3.
2A
llem
plo
yees
shal
lbe
trai
ned
inp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
seo
nan
ann
ual
bas
iso
rw
hen
sig
nifi
can
tp
rog
ram
chan
ges
occ
ur.
Th
etr
ain
ing
sess
ion
ssh
allb
ed
ocu
men
ted
.E
mp
loye
eh
irin
gan
dem
plo
ymen
tte
rmin
atio
np
ract
ices
shal
lco
nsi
der
secu
rity
asp
ects
asp
erm
itte
db
yla
w.
–D
oes
the
ann
ual
trai
nin
gp
rog
ram
incl
ud
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
se?
–H
ow
isp
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sean
das
soci
ated
con
tro
lsex
pla
ined
ton
ewem
plo
yees
?–
Are
ther
ere
cord
sth
atd
emo
nst
rate
that
emp
loye
esre
ceiv
edp
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
def
ense
trai
nin
g?
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 111
–Is
trai
nin
gu
pd
ated
acco
rdin
gto
chan
ges
inth
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
iald
efen
sep
rog
ram
?–
Ho
war
eem
plo
yees
info
rmed
of
maj
or
chan
ges
inth
ep
acka
gin
gm
ater
ial
def
ense
pro
gra
m?
–D
oes
the
syst
emev
alu
ate
trai
nin
gef
fect
iven
ess?
–D
oes
trai
nin
gin
clu
de
con
tro
lso
fkn
ow
l-ed
ge
acq
uir
edfr
om
the
last
vers
ion
of
the
pac
kag
ing
mat
eria
ldef
ense
trai
nin
g?
–W
hat
con
tro
lsar
eim
ple
men
ted
atth
eti
me
of
hir
e/t
erm
inat
ion
of
anem
plo
yee
or
crea
tio
n/t
erm
inat
ion
of
ase
rvic
eb
ya
con
trac
tor?
–A
reac
cess
con
tro
lsu
pd
ated
atth
eti
me
of
term
inat
ion
of
anem
plo
yee
or
wh
enth
ew
ork
isfi
nis
hed
on
the
par
to
fa
con
trac
tor?
6.4
Ext
ern
alIn
spec
tio
ns
6.4.
1A
do
cum
ente
dp
roce
du
resh
alle
xist
for
man
agin
gex
tern
alin
spec
tio
ns
and
reg
ula
tory
visi
ts(i
fap
plic
able
).R
elev
ant
per
son
nel
shal
lbe
trai
ned
toex
ecu
teth
ep
roce
du
re.
–Is
ther
ea
do
cum
ente
dp
roce
du
reth
atd
efin
esth
ecr
iter
iato
follo
win
case
anex
tern
alo
rgan
izat
ion
req
uir
esac
cess
toth
eco
mp
any’
sp
rem
ises
?–
Are
ther
ecl
earl
yd
efin
edle
vels
of
auth
ori
tyto
pro
vid
eac
cess
toex
tern
alo
rgan
izat
ion
sat
allt
imes
?–
Do
esth
ep
roce
du
red
efin
eth
em
ean
sto
pro
ceed
ifo
rw
hen
are
gu
lato
ryb
od
yre
qu
ests
acce
ssto
the
pre
mis
es?
–A
rere
leva
nt
fun
ctio
ns
awar
eo
fth
eir
resp
on
sib
iliti
esu
nd
ersu
chco
nd
itio
ns?
–A
rele
vels
of
auth
ori
tyd
efin
edw
ith
resp
ect
toth
eki
nd
of
info
rmat
ion
that
isal
low
edto
be
pro
vid
ed?
–A
reth
ere
mea
ns
toen
sure
aco
mp
lete
reco
rdo
fac
tivi
ties
do
ne
and
det
ails
of
the
visi
t?
© IFS, October 2012
112 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
ANNEX 1: GLOSSARY/DEFINITIONS LIST
Definitions which are not mentioned within the glossary can be foundin relevant regulations and directives. In relation to the terms usedwithin this document and PACsecure documents, the following defini-tions apply and shall be respected.
Term Explanation
Additive Materials such as plasticizers, preservatives, slip agents, antistaticagents, processing aids, and others, added to a base material in order to achieve aspecific result.
Adhesive An adhesive substance (as glue or cement, or starch in paper industry).
Allergen (EU) Food causing an adverse reaction that is mediated by an immunological response.Defined allergens are:– Cereals containing gluten (i.e. wheat, rye, barley, oats, spelt, kamut or their
hybridised strains) and products thereof– Crustaceans and products thereof– Eggs and products thereof– Fish and products thereof– Peanuts and products thereof– Soybeans and products thereof– Milk and products thereof (including lactose)– Nuts i.e. Almond (Amygdalus communis L.), Hazelnut (Corylus avellana), Walnut
(Juglans regia), Cashew (Anacardium occidentale), Pecan nut (Carya illinoiesis(Wangenh.) K. Koch), Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa), Pistachio nut (Pistacia vera),Macadamia nut and Queensland nut (Macadamia ternifolia) and products thereof
– Celery and products thereof– Lupin and products thereof– Molluscs and products thereof– Mustard and products thereof– Sesame seeds and products thereof– Sulphur dioxide and sulphites at concentrations of more than 10 mg/kg or
10 mg/litre expressed as SO2.(Commission Directive 2007/68 EC of 27 November 2007 amending Annex III a toDirective 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regardscertain food ingredients.)
Allergen (US) There are 8 major allergens recognized in the United States according to the2009 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Model Food Code, Definitionssection, page 12.(1) “Major food allergen“ means:
(a) Milk, egg, fish (such as bass, flounder, cod, and including crustacean shell-fish such as crab, lobster, or shrimp), tree nuts (such as almonds, pecans, orwalnuts), wheat, peanuts, and soybeans
(b) A Food ingredient that contains protein derived from a food, as specified inSubparagraph (1)(a) of this definition.
(2) “Major food allergen” does not include:a) Any highly refined oil derived from a food specified in Subparagraph (1)(a) of
this definition and any ingredient derived from such highly refined oil; orb) Any ingredient that is exempt under the petition or notification process
specified in the Food Allergen Labelling and Consumer Protection Act of2004 (Public Law 108-282).
Aseptic technique Precautionary measures taken to prevent contamination.
Assessor (foraccreditation bodies)
Person assigned by an accreditation body to perform, alone or as part of an assess-ment team, an assessment of a Conformity Assessment Body.
Audit Systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidenceand evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria arefulfiled.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 113
Auditor An individual who is qualified to provide audits, such as certified auditor.Note: An employee who is qualified and independent of the audited functiontypically conducts first-party/internal audit within the organization. A totallyindependent certified auditor who is not involved in the customer-supplier relation-ship conducts third-party audits.
Biological hazards Parasites, bacteria, moulds, or viruses that have the ability to cause illness or death.
Buyer/filler A company who buys packaging materials from packaging material manufacturerand converter and fill the package with the product.
Calibration Set of operations that establish, under specified conditions, the relationshipbetween values of quantities indicated by a measuring instrument or measuringsystem, or values represented by a material measure or a reference material andthe corresponding values realised by standards.
Carrier An operator of a conveyance such as a truck, railcar, vessel, or aircraft used totransport goods.
CCP – Critical ControlPoint
A step at which control can be applied and is essential to prevent or eliminate afood safety hazard or reduce it to an acceptable level.
Chemical hazards Chemical products (e.g. agricultural chemicals, cleaning agents, food and packag-ing additives, waxes and coatings, heavy metals, inks, solvents, etc.) that have thepotential to cause illness or death especially when used in excess of regulatorylimits.
Cleaning The removal of soil, residue, dirt, grease or other objectionable matter.
Company General organisation (whereas the site is a unit of the company).
Competent employee An employee who is familiar with and capable of assessing the operation of a pieceof equipment or process.
Contact surfaces Surfaces that contact packaging product. This also includes any surface that mightdrip or drain onto a surface that contacts packaging product during the normalcourse of operations. Contact surfaces include equipment such as containers, tablesand conveyor belts used in packaging operations. It does not include forklifts, handtrucks, or pallets that are used for handling wrapped packaging products.
Contamination Introduction or occurrence of a contaminant in packaging material or environment.Contamination does include: physical, chemical, biological contamination. Contami-nation can also mean correlation of packages among themselves.
Control measure (Food safety) action or activity that can be used to prevent or eliminate a foodsafety hazard or reduce it to an acceptable level. Acceptable levels may be derivedfrom; regulatory requirements; industry standards; scientific information; customerrequirements; risk assessments.
Converter A manufacturer that takes raw materials and converts them into a usable packageor package component.
Converting time The period in which a product may be processed/converted before being consid-ered unsuitable for the purpose.
Corporate Company.
Correction Action to eliminate a detected non-conformity or deviation.
Corrective action Action to eliminate the cause of a detected non-conformity or other undesirablesituation.
CP – Control point Identified by the hazard analysis as essential in order to control the likelihood ofintroducing or proliferation of food safety hazard in the product and/or the environ-ment.A CP can be considered as an OPRP (Operational Prerequisite Program), as definedin ISO 22000.
Customer A customer is a business company or person to whom products are sold either asfinished product or as a semi-finished part of the finished product.
© IFS, October 2012
114 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
Deviation Non-compliance with a requirement but there is no impact on food safety related toproducts and processes. In the IFS, deviations are requirements scored with a B, Cor D and KO requirements scored with a B.
Establishment Any building or surrounding area in which packaging material and/or product ishandled manufactured, or converted, and is under the control of the same manage-ment.
Extrusion The process of forming a thermoplastic film, container, or profile by forcing thepolymer melts through a shaped orifice. The extruded plastic is immediately chilled.
Facility Buildings and other physical structures used for or in connection with the manufac-turing and converting of packaging material and product.
Factory inspection(versus Internal audits)
Factory inspection covers specific subjects and can be carried out by any appropri-ate person. That means regular visits in any areas, for any purposes, to check theconformity (hygiene, pest control, product control, fabrication, foreign materialhazards, surrounding control etc.).
FIFO “First In—First Out”: an inventory system of product rotation, where the oldestproduct is shipped first.
Flow diagram A systematic representation of the sequence of steps or operations used in theproduction or manufacture of a particular packaging material item.
Food safety Assurance that food will not cause harm to the consumer when it is preparedand/or eaten according to its intended use.
Formula Exhaustive description of quantity and quality of raw materials to be used toprocess the products, as required in customer specifications.Formula can also include technological parameters and specific “know-how” on theprocess.
FSEP Food Safety Enhancement Program. The FSEP is the Canadian Food InspectionAgency’s (CFIA) approach to encourage and support the development, implementa-tion and maintenance of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems inall federally registered establishments of the meat, dairy, honey, maple syrup,processed fruit and vegetable, shell egg, processed egg and poultry hatcherysectors. Government and food industry developed FSEP jointly in 1991 in consulta-tion with consumer groups.(http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/polstrat/haccp/haccpe.shtml)
Glue Any of various strong adhesive substances; especially: a hard protein chieflygelatinous substance that absorbs water to form a viscous solution with strongadhesive.
GMO An organism, with the exception of human beings, in which the genetic materialhas been modified otherwise than natural multiplication or natural recombination.
GMP – Good Manufac-turing Practices
The practices that prevent and minimize the biological, chemical and physicalcontamination of packaging material and product during receiving, manufacturing,converting, storage and transportation, to ensure food safety.
GMP regulation(EU/US)
EU: (EC) No 2023/2006 of 22 December 2006 on good manufacturing practices formaterials and articles intended to come into contact with food.
US: 21 CFR 174 - 21 CFR 190.
HACCP (risk assess-ment)
A system which identifies evaluates and controls hazards which are significant forpackaging material safety.
Hazard A biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of, packaging material withthe potential to cause an adverse health effect.
Hazard analysis The process of collecting and evaluating information on hazards and conditionsleading to their presence to decide which are significant for packaging materialsafety and therefore should be addressed in the HACCP plan.
Head office assessment(for accreditationbodies)
Assessment of the Conformity Assessment Body Head Office.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 115
Hygiene Conditions and measures that are required to ensure that packaging material andproduct is safe.
Inert Material without active chemical properties.
Integrity Program Program implemented by IFS in order to:– Monitor, as preventive actions performance of auditors and certification bodies as
well as audited companies,– Manage, as corrective actions, any complaints addressed to IFS.
Internal audit General process of audit, for all the activity of the company. Conducted by or onbehalf of the company for internal purposes.Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activitydesigned to add value and improve an organization‘s operations. It helps anorganization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplinedapproach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control,and governance processes.
Lamination A process of plying layers of stock to a given thickness.
Lot The packaging product manufactured during a period of time or according to aspecific code.
Leak test A testing process designed to find unintended holes or voids that allow air or fluidto pass through packaging materials. For labeled products, leak test is conductedprior to labeling in order to avoid concealing any leaks.
Microorganisms Organisms too small to be seen by the naked eye that include yeasts, moulds,bacteria, and viruses.
Monitoring The act of conducting a planned sequence of observations or measurements ofcontrol parameters to assess whether a CP is under control.See also Codex Alimentarius, General principles of Food hygiene, Guidelines forthe application of the HACCP system, section 9.
MSDS – Material SafetyData Sheet
The safety data sheet information is principally intended for use by professionalusers and must enable them to take the necessary measures as regards the protec-tion of health, safety and the environment at the place of work. The safety datasheet may be supplied on paper or electronically, provided that the addressee hasthe necessary means of receiving it.
Non-conformity Non-fulfilment of a specified requirement. Non-conformity can be given in non-respect of legislation, law, packaging material safety, internal dysfunctions andcustomer issues. In the IFS, defined non-conformities are Majors and KO’s scoredwith a D.
Packaging materialdefense/Food defense(US)
Food Defense is the collective term used by the US Food and Drug Administration(FDA), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of HomelandSecurity (DHS), etc. to encompass activities associated with protecting the nation’sfood supply from deliberate or intentional acts of contamination or tampering. Thisterm encompasses other similar verbiage (i.e., bioterrorism (BT), counter-terrorism(CT), etc.),The USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service define Food Defense as “the protec-tion of food products from intentional adulteration by biological, chemical, physicalor radiological agents.”The definition also applies on packaging materials.
Pest Any animal or insect such as birds, rodents, cockroaches, flies, and larvae that maycarry pathogens and can contaminate packaging material and product.
Physical hazards Physical components (e.g. wood or glass chip, metal piece, etc.) and foreign matterthat can cause illness or injury. This includes pests and their components.
Potable air Air containing less than 1,000 viable colony-forming units of total micro-organismsper cubic meter of air. Air containing less than 200 viable colony-forming units ofbacteria and 200 viable colony-forming units of fungi in a cubic meter of air. Usersshould check with authority having local jurisdiction for limits pertaining to chemi-cal and other contaminants.
© IFS, October 2012
116 Part 2 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1
Potable water (CA) Water that meets Health Canada’s Canadian Drinking Water Guidelines.(http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/doc_sup-appui/index_e.html)
Potable water Water suitable for human consumption without endangering health. It is immacu-late concerning smell, taste and nature.
Primary packaging Packaging coming into contact with the packed goods such as PET bottles, cups,plastic closures of packages.
Procedure Specified way to carry out an activity or process. Procedures shall be implementedand the elaboration of procedures shall be done by documents or process descrip-tion (e.g. flowchart).
Product Result of a process or activities transforming inputs into outputs. Products includeservices. In the context of this Standard a product is to be considered a packagingmaterial.
Product development The creation of products with new or different characteristics that offer new oradditional benefits to the customer. Product development may involve modificationof an existing product or its presentation, or formulation of an entirely new productthat satisfies a newly defined customer who wants a market niche. In the IFSPACsecure Standard, the requirements for chapter product development apply evenif there is just a product modification, use of new wrapping materials or modifica-tions of production processes.
Product recall Any measure aimed at achieving the return of a dangerous product that has alreadybeen supplied or made available to consumers by the producer or distributor.
Product requirements Product requirements includes: product safety, product quality, product legality,process and specification.
Product withdrawal Any measure aimed at preventing the distribution, display and offer of a productdangerous to the consumer.
Qualified employee An employee who is qualified (such as certified auditor) and independent of theaudited function conducts first-party/internal audit within the organization.
Raw material One of the parts of a mixture
Raw material specifica-tion (RMS)
A document describing detailed product features, attributes and processing factorsthat enable the user or the document (i.e. supplier) to produce or supply materialthat will fulfil its intended use.
Reviewer Person of the certification body in charge of assessing the IFS PACsecure auditsreports before a certification decision is made.The tasks of the reviewer are, at least:– To check the overall consistency of the audit reports.– To check if the audit reports are properly completed– To check if the findings are well described and if the justifications are relevant.– To check if the corrective actions proposed by the audited company have been
validated by the auditor (or by a representative of the certification body) and arerelevant.The review shall be documented.
Risk A function of the probability of an adverse health effect and the severity of thateffect consequential to (a) hazard(s) in packaging material.
Secondary packaging Packaging, e.g. films that have no contact with the food.
Senior management Executive management.
Services See definition of product.
Site A unit of the company.
Supplier QualityAssurance (SQA)Program
A program designed to ensure raw materials/other material suppliers are incompliance with product specifications and safety or quality requirements. Theprogram often includes elements such as a supplier selection and approval process;supplier auditing and product testing.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure · Version 1 Part 2 117
System Set of interrelated or interacting elements. System is a planned, sustainablestructured course of action. Depending on the complexity, documentation isrecommended. System includes: documentation, procedure description, con-trol/monitoring, corrective action, site plan.
Tertiary packaging Packaging/wrapping that is used to group secondary packaging together to aidhandling and transportation and prevent damage to the products, for example, thepallet and shrink wrap used to transport a number of cardboard outer containingboxes filled with packaging material.
Traceability Ability to trace and follow a material intended to be, or expected to be incorporatedinto a packaging material, through all stages of production, converting and distribu-tion.
Validation Confirmation through the provision of objective evidences that the requirements forthe specific intended use or application have been fulfiled.
Verification Confirmation through the provision of objective evidences that specified require-ments have been fulfiled.
Witness assessment(by accreditationbodies)
Assessment of the Conformity Assessment Body when it is carrying out conformityassessment services within its scope of accreditation.
Witness audit beforeapplying to IFS exami-nations
The auditor who is witnessed shall be accompanied by an observer from thecertification body during a complete audit in order to evaluate his/her competence.The observer shall not be part of the audit (as a team member).The observer shall fulfil the same requirements as for trainers or shall be an IFSPACsecure auditor, IFS Food auditor or IFS HPC auditor.This witness audit shall be a product safety audit and/or an audit under ISO/IEC17065.On the application file of the auditor (sent afterwards to the IFS offices), the certifi-cation body shall specify the name of the company, audit date and name of theperson who observed the auditor. On request, the certification body shall be able toprovide minutes of the witness audit.
Witness audit,to be performedevery 2 years,for IFS PACsecureapproved auditors
The auditor who is witnessed shall be accompanied by an observer from thecertification body during a complete IFS PACsecure, IFS Food, IFS HPC, or anotherGFSI recognized packaging material safety scheme audit, in order to evaluatehis/her competence. The observer shall not be part of the audit (as a team mem-ber).The observer shall fulfil the same requirements as for trainers or shall be an IFSPACsecure, IFS Food or IFS HPC auditor. For the observer, relevant product scope(s)approval, in relation to the products/processes of the audit, is not mandatory.The certification body shall specify the name of the observer in the participants’ listof the IFS PACsecure audit report and shall be able to provide, on request, minutesof this witness audit.
Wrapping See tertiary packaging.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 119
Part 3: Requirements for AccreditationBodies, Certification Bodies andAuditors
IFS accreditation and certificationprocess
0 Introduction
IFS PACsecure certification is a product and process certification. Allbodies involved shall comply with the international rules and IFS-spe-cific requirements described in this document. Part 3 of the IFS PACse-cure Standard deals mainly with accreditation bodies, certification bod-ies and auditors.
1 Requirements for the Accreditation Bodies
1.1 General requirements
The accreditation bodies shall fulfil the requirements of the ISO/IEC17011 norm “Conformity assessment – General requirements for Accre-ditation Bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies”, and shallhave signed the MLA (Multilateral Agreement) for Product Certificationof the EA or IAF.
As soon as it will come into force, the accreditation bodies shall alsofulfil the GFSI Requirements for the Application of ISO/IEC 17011:2004,which is complementary of the below requirements.
In order to ensure interactive communication, the accreditation bodyshall appoint an IFS contact person within their organisation.
1.2 The training of the accreditation committee(or competent person)
In general, all accreditation body personnel engaged in IFS PACsecureaccreditation activity shall have sufficient knowledge of the IFS PACse-cure scheme, related normative documents and food or packagingindustry.
Decisions on accreditation can only be made following a recommenda-tion of a competent person or accreditation committee. The person incharge, or at least one member of the accreditation committee, shall
© IFS, October 2012
120 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
have taken part in an IFS PACsecure training course organised by IFS orshall be able to demonstrate equivalent knowledge level as confirmedby IFS. In case of a committee, the trained person provides the othermembers of the accreditation committee with the necessary informa-tion.This information is based on the main points of the IFS PACsecuretraining course with the main emphasis on Part 1 (IFS PACsecure auditprotocol), Part 3 (requirements for accreditation bodies, certificationbodies and auditors), Part 4 (audit report, certificate) and the auditors’approval process for IFS.
1.3 Competences of the assessor of the accreditationbody
The assessor(s) of the accreditation bodies is responsible for the follow-ing:
– accompanying IFS PACsecure auditors during registered IFSPACsecure audits (witness assessment),
– assessing the head office of the certification body (head officeassessment) according to the ISO/IEC 17065 rules and IFS-spe-cific requirements.
In general, the assessor(s) shall meet ISO/IEC 17065 and IFS require-ments.
Witness assessors shall, at a minimum:
– Have taken part in the IFS PACsecure training course, or shallbe able to demonstrate an equivalent knowledge level as con-firmed by IFS,
– Have taken part in a HACCP course or other course related tohazard analysis and assessment of associated risks,
– Have a minimum of two (2) years of experience in the packag-ing material industry sector.
Head office assessors shall, at a minimum:
– Have specific knowledge in the IFS PACsecure scheme,
– Have specific knowledge of the related normative documents.
1.4 Frequency of the assessments of certification bodies
For initial assessment, a head office assessment (with review of at leastone full certification process) and at least one witness assessment shallbe performed.
The certification body is allowed to perform maximum 5 audits beforegetting accreditation. In this case, at least one of the audits shall be
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 121
assessed by the accreditation body (witness assessment) and all audits(including at least one full certification process) shall be reviewed by theaccreditation body during the initial headquarter assessment.
For renewal assessment, a head office assessment (with review of atleast one full certification process) and at least one witness assessmentshall be performed.
During the surveillance of the accreditation cycle:
– A minimum of one head office assessment a year,
– A minimum of one witness assessment every two (2) years
shall take place.
Remark: a flexibility of three (3) months at themaximum can be allowedfor the interval between two (2) assessments, according to the accredi-tation body rules.
During head office assessments, the following documentation shall besampled and assessed, as a minimum:
– At least 10% or two (2) IFS PACsecure auditor files, whicheveris greater,
– At least two (2) site files or 2% of delivered audits, whichever isgreater.
For consecutive witness assessments, the accreditation body shall,wherever possible, select two different certification body’s IFS PACse-cure auditors with different scopes.
1.5 Accreditation of an internationally-activecertification body
The witness assessments shall cover the typical activities (includinginternational activities and critical locations) of the certification body. Ifthe accreditation body subcontracts an assessment, the subcontractedaccreditation body shall be a signatory to the IAF MLA for Product Cer-tification. IAF GD 3 Cross Frontier Policy shall apply.
1.6 Conditions for recovering accreditation afterwithdrawal or suspension
In case the accreditation body decides to withdraw or suspend accredi-tation, certification bodies shall stop performing IFS PACsecure auditsand issuing IFS PACsecure certificates. To recover accreditation afterwithdrawal, the same conditions as for initial assessment apply. In caseof accreditation suspension, IFS and accreditation body will jointlydetermine requirements to remove suspension.
© IFS, October 2012
122 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
1.7 Transfer of certification
In case one certification body decides to transfer its certification activi-ties to another one, the new certification body shall verify all current IFSPACsecure certificates, in order to decide if further actions (e.g. with-drawal of recent certificates or additional IFS renewal audit) will be nec-essary.
2 Requirements for the Certification Bodies
Certification bodies intending to perform IFS PACsecure audits shallcomply with the following rules. The prescribed tender procedure forcertification bodies is supplied by IFS.
2.1 ISO/IEC 17065 IFS accreditation process
The certification body shall be accredited according to ISO/IEC 17065for the scope of IFS PACsecure by an IAF or EA recognised accreditationbody (see section 1). Certification bodies in the process of IFS accredita-tion to ISO/IEC 17065 may organise the witness assessment(s) beforehaving achieved accreditation status.They shall demonstrate that theyare actively applying for ISO/IEC 17065 accreditation.
Note: In case of withdrawal or suspension of the ISO/IEC 17065 accred-itation of the scope of IFS PACsecure for the certification body, thewhole certification process is stopped and the certification body is nolonger allowed to issue any IFS PACsecure certificates. In particular, thecertification body cannot issue IFS PACsecure certificates from the dateof withdrawal or suspension, even for the audits which have beenalready performed but which are still in the certification process (reviewof the report, certification decision, etc.).
2.2 Signing of contract with the proprietor of IFS
After having applied and then gained IFS accreditation to ISO/IEC 17065,in order to be allowed to perform IFS PACsecure audits, the certificationbody shall sign a contract with IFS in which it commits to meet all IFSrequirements. The certification body is not authorised to perform IFSPACsecure audits (except the first witness assessment(s) during theaccreditation process) before having signed this contract.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 123
2.3 Certification decision
The person in charge of assessing the audit reports (reviewer) shall beeither an approved IFS PACsecure auditor, an IFS PACsecure trainer orshall fulfil the following rules:
– To have a food or packaging university degree and two (2) yearsprofessional experience in the food safety/packaging materialsafety and quality related professions
– To have attended (as auditor or observer) at ten (10) completeaudits (related to other packaging material safety schemes) inthe last five (5) years
– To have participated in a hygiene training course
– To have participated in IFS PACsecureTrain-the-trainer course
– To be different of the person who performed the audit.
The review shall be documented.
The decision concerning the certification can only be made followingthe recommendation of a competent person or a certification commit-tee. Furthermore, decision can only be made by a person different fromthe person who performed the audit.The competent person for the cer-tification decision or at least one of the members of the certificationcommittee shall be an IFS PACsecure auditor, an IFS PACsecure traineror an IFS PACsecure reviewer.
According to ISO/IEC 17065, the final certification decision shall bemade by the certification body and shall not be subcontracted.
2.4 Certification bodies’ responsibilities forIFS PACsecure trainers and the IFS PACsecureauditors (including freelancers)
Certification bodies have the following responsibilities:
– To facilitate witness audits (by accreditation bodies and/or byIntegrity Program).
– To ensure that at least one member of their staff is an IFS PAC-secure trainer who has taken part in an IFS PACsecure Train-the-trainer course. The trainer is responsible for the in-housetraining of all auditors, intending to become IFS PACsecureauditors or who already are IFS PACsecure auditors. Personsintending to become IFS PACsecure trainers shall meet therequirements mentioned in 2.5.Note: for a certification body which is starting IFS activities,this in-house training can be organised by IFS, on request.
© IFS, October 2012
124 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
– To ensure that the auditor is competent for the scope of theaudit and its execution and is able to access and to apply rele-vant laws and regulations, based on IFS and internal certifica-tion body’s requirements; the certification body shall maintainthese competences (continuous supervision by the certificationbody) and shall monitor audit execution by on-site witnessaudit. Every auditor shall be monitored by an IFS PACsecure (orIFS Food, IFS HPC or other GFSI recognized packaging materialsafety) on-site witness audit at least once every two (2) years,and the results of this witness audit shall be documented.Theobserver shall be an IFS PACsecure, IFS Food or IFS HPCapproved auditor or shall follow the same rules as for trainers(see section 2.5).
– To maintain records of auditor competences.
– To ensure that no auditor has either acted against IFS rules, forexample acting as a consultant, or has been active in and/or onbehalf of the company being audited during the previous two(2) years. That is to say, during the certification process, noother commercial and/or personal relationships are permittedbetween the auditee and the auditor.
– To ensure that no auditor shall performmore than three (3) con-secutive IFS PACsecure audits of the same production site (onlyapplies for complete audits, whatever the time between them;follow up and extension audits are not concerned by this rule).
– To ensure that an auditor is employed by only one IFS certifica-tion body for performing IFS PACsecure audits and this for aperiod of not less than 12 months. In special cases, IFS officesshall be contacted and may allow exceptions.
– To sign an audit order for each audit, this includes a statementaccepting all the above-mentioned requirements.
– To organise a 2-day training session for IFS PACsecure auditorsonce a year for the purposes of sharing experience, calibrationand updating knowledge of relevant legal requirements, etc.The IFS PACsecure trainer shall lead a part of the trainingcourse.
– To perform an on-site witness audit of an auditor during a prod-uct safety audit and/or an audit under ISO/IEC 17065 accredita-tion to ensure the auditor’s competence (see glossary) beforehe/she has applied for the IFS examinations. The certificationbody shall state the date, the name of the audited companywhere the on-site witness audit took place, and the name of theobserver in the IFS examination application file.The minutes ofthe on-site witness audit shall be provided on request to the IFSin English, French or German.The observer for the on-site wit-ness audit of an auditor applying for IFS examination shallcomply with the same requirements as the trainers (see section2.5) or shall be an IFS PACsecure, IFS Food or IFS HPC auditor.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 125
– To include the name of the observer in the Audit Portal whenuploading the audit data, when it has scheduled specific on-site IFS witness audit(s) according to ISO/IEC 17065 on internalaudits.
The certification body is responsible for choosing an auditor with thecorresponding scope(s), language, competence(s), etc. for each IFSPACsecure audit.
2.5 Specific requirements for IFS PACsecure trainers
IFS PACsecure trainers shall have the following profile:
– Fulfil requirements for IFS PACsecure auditors as described insection 3.2 a), b), c) and d),
– Have audit experience to GFSI standards or other packagingmaterial safety schemes,
– Have knowledge of packaging legislation,
– Have taken part in a IFS PACsecure Train-the-trainer courseorganised by IFS,
– Be fluent in writing and speaking the languages they will useduring participating in training and leading training; they shallinform the IFS offices about the languages they are able to usewhen teaching.
The IFS PACsecureTrain-the-Trainer course is organised by IFS.
In order to keep his/her knowledge of IFS PACsecure up to date, eachIFS PACsecure trainer shall take part in a 2-day IFS PACsecure trainingcourse every two (2) years. These seminars are organised by IFS andshall be the basis for in-house training to all auditors.
IFS PACsecure trainers have the responsibility to:
– Train new IFS PACsecure auditors before applying to IFS PAC-secure exams,
– Lead (a part or the whole) 2-day training session for IFS PACse-cure auditors once a year, for the purposes of sharing experi-ence, calibration and updating knowledge of relevant legalrequirements, etc.
When a new version of the Standard is published, the certificationbody’s trainer shall take part in the new IFS PACsecure course organisedby IFS and carry out in-house training of all the already IFS PACsecureapproved auditors, before performing audits based on new version.Theduration of this in-house training shall be at least one day.
In case of publication of new doctrines, the trainer shall train all IFSPACsecure auditors before the doctrine comes into force.
© IFS, October 2012
126 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
3 Requirements for IFS PACsecure auditors
In general, the auditors shall meet the requirements of chapters 7.2 and7.3.1 of ISO 19011.
During an IFS PACsecure audit, auditors shall, according to IFS goodauditing practices, use relevant samples of products, in order to inves-tigate on-site the auditee’s production processes and documentationand to check the fulfilment of IFS requirements. In particular, auditorsshall perform, during the audit, a traceability test in the company.
IFS publishes guidelines which can provide further information on topicsto be checked and/or requested to the audited company during the audit.
3.1 Conversion of auditors to get the IFS PACsecureversion 1 auditor approval
Auditors being already qualified for PACsecure or other IFS schemesare allowed to audit against the IFS PACsecure version 1, without goingthrough the full qualification process as mentioned in 3.2 and 3.3 if theyfulfil the following requirements:
– If they are PACsecure auditors: they shall have experience inproduct/process certification (or attend a training on product/process certification organised by IFS, including verification ofacquired knowledge) and additionally attend an IFS PACsecuretraining organised by IFS.
– If they are IFS HPC auditors approved for scope 3 (Housekeep-ing properties): they shall additionally attend an IFS PACsecuretraining organised by IFS.
– If they are IFS Food approved auditors, also qualified for a pack-aging standard related to safety and quality, like GMP FEFCO,ISO 22000 scope M or BRC IoP: they shall additionally attend anIFS PACsecure training organised by IFS.
– If they are qualified for a packaging standard related to safetyand quality (e.g. BRC IoP, ISO 22000 scope M, etc.): they shallattend an IFS PACsecure training organised by IFS and, if rele-vant, additional training on product/process certification,organised by IFS.
3.2 Requirements for new IFS PACsecure auditors
3.2.1 Requirements before applying for the IFS PACsecureexaminations
Before applying for IFS examinations, auditors shall have met the fol-lowing requirements:
– They shall have signed a contract with the certification body(see ISO/IEC 17065 norm).
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 127
– They confirm to the certification body that, for a period of atleast 12 months, they will perform IFS PACsecure audits onlyfor the respective certification body.They may, however, workfor several certification bodies on other standards. In specialcases, IFS should be contacted and may allow exceptions.
– They shall have participated at the IFS PACsecure in-housecourse organised by the certification body.
– They shall have submitted all the relevant information abouttheir competence to the certification body.
– The certification body shall have observed and confirmed theprofessional qualification and competence of the auditors.
3.2.2 General requirements for auditors when applying forIFS PACsecure examinations
Candidates applying for qualification as IFS PACsecure auditors shallmeet the following requirements and provide evidence with the appli-cation documents. An outline CV is available from IFS.
a) Education in the food and packaging material sector1) A food or packaging-related university degree (bachelor’s and/or
master’s degree equivalents) and two (2) years professional expe-rience in the packaging material industry in relation to packagingmaterial production activities (quality, production, R&D, …).
or2) If the candidate started directly as an auditor after completing
his/her food or packaging related university degree then the can-didate shall have five (5) years professional audit experience inthe packaging related industry.
or3) If the candidate has a university degree but not a food or packag-
ing-related one, (bachelor’s and/or master’s degree equivalents)then the candidate shall have five (5) years professional experi-ence in the packaging material industry—in relation to packagingmaterial production activities (quality, production, R&D, …).
or4) Professional education in food or packaging processing (high
degree) and five (5) years professional experience in the packag-ing material industry—in relation to packaging material produc-tion activities (quality, production, R&D, …).
b) General audit experienceA minimum of ten (10) complete audits shall be performed by theauditor in the packaging material processing industry during the pre-vious two years. The audits shall have been carried out in differentcompanies.
c) Food/Packaging hygiene (including HACCP/risk assessment) trainingQualified training on the basis of the Codex General Principles forFood Hygiene.
© IFS, October 2012
128 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
d) Training in auditing techniques based on Quality Management Sys-tem or Packaging Material Safety Management SystemDuration: one week/40 hours or equivalent.
e) Specific and practical knowledge for product scopes auditors applyfor (see Annex 1 for product scopes)At least two (2) years professional experience in the packaging mate-rial industry in relation to packaging activities, for each applied prod-uct scope.orAt least ten (10) packaging safety audits and/or second party auditsincluding quality and packaging material safety investigations withtraceable origin and confirmed by the retailer or by the industry, perproduct scope.Ten (10) witness audits during IFS PACsecure audits,as observer, are also accepted to qualify the observer on the productscope. Audits shall have been carried out in different companies.
f) LanguageAuditors must be fluent in English.
g) IFS PACsecure in-house trainingIFS PACsecure in-house training materials shall be based on thematerials provided by IFS. The auditor shall have taken part in thein-house training (covering IFS, packaging-related legislation, gen-eral hygiene requirements, GMP) undertaken by an authorised IFSPACsecure trainer and organised by the certification body.The mini-mum duration shall be two (2) days.
IFS is responsible for the technical validation of the auditors’ applica-tion files before they take part in IFS examinations. If the auditor’s CVdoes not meet the above-mentioned requirements, IFS may reject theauditor’s examination application. If the auditor does not show suffi-cient evidence for the product scopes he/she is applying for, IFS mayreject the applications for the product scopes concerned.
All CV’s content shall be confirmed by a person from the accreditedcertification body who shall put his/her name and position on the bot-tom of the CV.
Note: IFS offices have the possibility to withdraw an IFS PACsecureauditor approval or not to accept him/her at the examination, if theinformation provided in the CV is false.This kind of breach will be alsoforwarded to the IFS Integrity Program.
3.3 IFS examination process (for new auditors,as specified in chapter 3.2)
Auditors who comply with the requirements mentioned in chapter 3.2can take part in an IFS PACsecure written examination. If successful, theauditor is officially authorised to perform IFS PACsecure audits. Theauditor is registered and a personal IFS PACsecure auditor certificate isissued. Starting from the day of passing the written examination, theauditor is allowed to perform IFS PACsecure audits for the product
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 129
scopes he/she was authorized for by IFS offices until the end of thesecond calendar year. The IFS PACsecure auditor certificate mentionsthe duration of validity, the name of the certification body and the audi-tors’ product scope(s).
3.4 Maintenance of auditors’ qualification (for both typesof auditors, as specified in chapters 3.1 and 3.2)
The auditor cannot perform IFS PACsecure audits anymorewhen his/herIFS PACsecure auditor certificate expires. The certification body isresponsible to maintain auditor’s IFS approval so that there are no gapsduring the auditor approval.
Auditors’ approval shall be re-assessed before end of validity of theauditor certificates. For maintaining their approval, auditors shall fulfilthe following requirements:
– have performed a minimum number of ten (10) IFS PACsecureaudits (5 audits per year),
– have been trained internally by the certification body on pack-aging-related legislation, Standard requirements, audit prac-tices, etc. (2 days per year),
– be monitored by an IFS on-site witness audit (once every twoyears).This audit can be performed at any time during the yearof end of validity of auditor’s certificate. Witness assessmentsperformed by accreditation bodies during IFS PACsecure auditsare accepted as witness audits,
– have taken part in an IFS PACsecure calibration training course(subsequent to passing the initial examination, the first manda-tory calibration training shall be successfully completed in thesecond calendar year following the date on which the initialexamination was successfully completed.Then, the re-approvalshall be managed every two (2) calendar years, based on thesame rule).
Documented evidences shall be provided to IFS offices.
Example:Date of initial written examination: 25th of October 2012Date of end of validity for IFS PACsecure auditor certificate (initialapproval): 31st of December 2014Auditor is authorised to perform IFS PACsecure audits between 25th Octo-ber 2012 and 31st December 2014.In 2014, if the auditor has performed 10 IFS PACsecure audits (5 peryear), if he/she has been trained internally, through a yearly 2 dayscourse, has been witnessed, and has taken part in the IFS PACsecurecalibration training, the new end validity date of IFS PACsecure auditorcertificate (re-approval) is: 31st December 2016.
If any of these three rules are not fulfiled, the auditor shall participateagain in the IFS PACsecure initial written examination.
© IFS, October 2012
130 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
3.5 Scope extension for IFS-approved auditors
Auditors may, during the validity of their IFS PACsecure auditor certifi-cate, extend their product scopes. Scopeextensionmaynot be requestedin the first 12 months after the initial IFS PACsecure auditor approval.
For extension of product scope(s), they shall provide the same evidenceas for the initial approval, based on new experience (new from the ini-tial application). At least ten (10) IFS PACsecure audits in the scope, as atrainee, can also be accepted as evidence. The auditor shall have par-ticipated in all steps of the audit (on-site audit, assessment and decisionprocesses).
The auditors can only perform IFS PACsecure audits according to thescopes stated by IFS.
3.6 Audit team
3.6.1 General rules
In general, all members of the audit team shall be IFS approved audi-tors.
In case of auditing with teams, the following general regulations apply:
– An IFS PACsecure audit team consists of IFS PACsecureapproved auditors whose product scopes comply with theactivities of the audited site.
– A lead auditor shall always be appointed.
– Co-auditor(s) shall always be approved for at least one productscope of the audit scope.Two (2) hours of the audit duration arenot shareable; this additional time shall be allocated to theteam, not to an individual auditor, for common tasks (e.g. open-ing and closing meeting, discussion about audit findings, etc.)
– The remaining time can be split as long as the auditor compe-tencies for product scopes are not disconnected during theaudit. No “crossing over” is allowed.This means that, if the leador co-auditor(s) do not have, individually, all product scopeswhich are necessary for the audit, they have to audit all parts ofthe audit related to product scope knowledge together.
It shall be clearly indicated in the audit time schedule which auditor didwhich part of the audit. Auditors without necessary scopes can onlytake part as trainees.
The minimum audit duration shall anyway be respected.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 3 131
3.6.2 Specific rules for audit team and auditing 3 consecutivetimes
For audit teams an additional rule applies as regulation for consecutiveaudits. As an exceptional case, (if the certification body has no otherpossibility to combine an audit team in year 4–6, due tomissing approvalfor product scope of their auditors) the following sequence of auditorplanning is possible:
Year 1–3: Lead auditor A + co-auditor B
Year 4–6: Lead auditor B + co-auditor C
Year 7: Lead auditor A or C + co-auditor A or C.
© IFS, October 2012
132 Part 3 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
ANNEX 1: Product scopes
1. Flexible packaging
2. Rigid plastic
3. Paper
4. Metal
5. Glass
6. Other natural materials
Multi component packagingmaterials (e.g.Tetra Pak) have tobeassignedbased on the material which is the main component of the material.Themain component of multi component packaging materials shall bementioned in the scope of the audit on the report.
Materials to be considered as “other natural materials” are, for examplewood, clay, cork, jute, textiles, banana leaves, etc.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 133
Part 4: Reporting and IFS Audit Portal
0 Introduction
After an IFS PACsecure audit has been performed, a detailed and well-structured audit report shall be completed. The language of the reportshall be English. The IFS PACsecure audit report shall be preparedaccording to the following format.
1 Reporting
1.1 Audit overview (Annex 1)
The first part of the audit report shall contain the following generalinformation:
Audit detailsThe cover page of the audit report shall include:
– name and address of the certification body
– the logo of the certification body
– the certification body’s accreditation details
– name of the audited company or site
– date of the audit.
These first pages shall give a summary of the most important auditreport items and shall include:
– name and address of the audited site
– name and address of the company (if headquarters)
– EAN. UCC Global Location Number, if available
– COID, as defined in the IFS Portal
– audit date (in case of a follow up audit the date of the follow upaudit shall additionally be defined)
– time of the audit
– previous audit date
– the name of the certification body and the auditor who per-formed the previous audit
– details of the version of the Standard
© IFS, October 2012
134 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
– audit scope (mandatory detailed descriptions of processes/products)
– numbers of product scopes
– list of key personnel present at audit
– name of the lead auditor
– if applicable, additional name of the co-auditor
– if applicable, name of the auditor trainee
– result of the audit (in case of a follow up audit, to specify that afollow up audit has taken place and that the Major non-con-formity has been solved)
– company profile: some compulsory general information aboutthe company shall be provided, as follows:
· The year of construction of the plant
· The registration numbers of the company by authorities ifavailable and/or existing (and GS1 number, if available)
· The COID (IFS identification code number), in case of renewalaudit
· When the last investment was made in production, productoriented investments concerning quality and safety (con-struction changes, machines). Specify the kind of investmentmade in production area
· The name and contact data (phone/fax/e-mail) of the contactperson in case of emergency (e.g. withdrawal/recall)
· Product groups and products per group produced in thecompany
· Complete view of the company’s processes
· If the audited company also has trade products (already pro-cessed), specify the kinds products
· How many employees are there, listed according to full-timeand part-time workers (own employees, external compa-nies), shift work
· The number and names of the sub-companies (sites) of thecompany (where are they situated, if they are IFS certified),precision about names and kinds of sub-contracted part(s) ofthe process
· The site area of the plant in square meters
· State if the company fulfils the requirements about use ofIFS logo, as defined in IFS PACsecure audit protocol (Part 1)
· If the certification body has decided to decrease audit dura-tion (see rules in chapter 5.3 of audit protocol), explanationsabout the reasons for decreasing
· If the site is certified according to other schemes, specify theschemes’ names
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 135
· If there are seasonal breaks in production process, pleasespecify time frame
– further explanations regarding scoring and frequency
– below the company profile: name of the person in charge ofassessing the report (reviewer).
1.2 Audit report (Annex 2)
The audit report itself is structured as follows:
– the result of the audit with level and percentage
– observations on KO’s and Majors (in case of a follow up audit,additional explanation on which requirement the Major hasbeen solved)
– general summary table for all chapters
– an overall summary of the audit (of all chapters)
– a list of all established deviations and non-conformities foreach chapter (1 to 6)
– a description of follow up of corrective actions from the previ-ous audit
– a separate list (including explanations) of all requirementsevaluated with N/A (not applicable)
– a detailed audit report.
1.3 Action plan (Annex 3)
The certification body/the auditor describes and explains all establisheddeviations and non-conformities (KO’s, Majors) in each chapter in theaction plan, which has a specified format shown in the annex.
1.4 Minimum requirements for IFS PACsecure certificate(Annex 4)
After successful completion of the IFS PACsecure process, the certifica-tion body shall issue a certificate in English language. For the purposesof international recognition, and so as to be understandable, IFS PACse-cure certificates awarded by the certification body shall include the fol-lowing information at a minimum:
– the name and address of the certification body, including itslogo
© IFS, October 2012
136 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
– the logo of the accreditation body or its name and registrationnumber (requirement mentioned in the ISO/IEC Guide 65,G.12.7.); the logo of accreditation body shall be used in con-formity with accreditation body’s rules
– the name and address of the audited company
– the COID, as defined in the IFS Portal
– if the company is a subsidiary, the name of the company’sheadquarters
– audit scope (with mandatory detailed descriptions of pro-cesses/products and including for instance trade products ifapplicable). If the list of the products is too long to be specifiedon the one page certificate, the list shall be specified in an annexand the IFS certificate shall make a reference to that annex.
– name and number of product scope(s)
– level achieved
– audit score in percentage, if required by the customer or by theaudited company
– date of audit (last day of audit)
– date of follow up audit if relevant
– next audit to be performed within the time period (renewalaudit)
– certificate issue date
– certificate expiry date, i.e. 12 months after the date of issue thecertificate (the certificate validity date shall remain the sameeach year as described in the audit protocol, Part 1)
– place and date of signature
– name and signature of the certification body’s person(s) respon-sible for the certification decision as described in Part 3 of theStandard
– IFS PACsecure logo
– PACsecure logo.
2 The IFS Audit Portal and the IFS Database(www.ifs-certification.com)
Every IFS PACsecure audit shall be uploaded to the IFS Audit Portal bythe certification body (uploading of report, action plan and certificate).
There are 3 user groups which have access to the IFS Database:
– Certification bodies
– Certified companies
– Retailers and other users.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 137
The different groups’ access rights are as follows:
Certification bodies:
– manage their certified companies and upload audit reports,action plans and certificates
– may suspend certificates in specific situations
– can manage all IFS PACsecure audit dates via the diary func-tion, enabling retailers and companies to have a good overviewof the scheduled audits. It is mandatory to upload in the diaryfunction of the Audit Portal all audits dates, at latest 2 weeksbefore the audit.
– manage their accounts
– have the possibility to compare two consecutive audit reportsand action plans, for internal auditor training and calibrationpurposes
– download the IFS logo(s).
Certified companies/suppliers:
– have access to their own audit data
– have the possibility to unlock retailers and other users for theirachieved percentage, detailed audit report and action plan
– have the possibility to compare two consecutive audit reportsand action plans, for improvement purposes
– download the IFS Logo(s)
– manage their certification bodies
– manage company personnel access (create sub-accounts) tothe audit data
– search for other certified companies
– manage their suppliers using a “favourites” option.
Access for the headquarters of certified companiesA “headquarter” access for certified companies can be set up whichallows a company headquarter to administer all of their certified sitesthrough a single access point.
Retailers and other users:
– search for certified companies
– manage their certified companies via a “favourites” option
– get information via e-mail in case of a certificate suspension oftheir favourite companies.
The user manuals for the IFSAudit Portal are available on the respectivesecured area for each user group.
© IFS, October 2012
138 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
Security of the DatabaseThe security system used for the database is based on internationalrecognised and mostly used security systems.The retailer and certifiedcompanies access provide general information about all certified com-panies. If no further authorisation is granted by the certified companiesboth user groups will be able to see the following information only:
– the company’s name and address
– the certification body’s name and address
– the auditor’s name (including auditor scopes)
– the scope of the audit
– the date and duration of the audit
– the level achieved at the audit
– the IFS PACsecure certificate’s date of issue and its validity.
By using their secure log-in access‚ the certified companies themselvescan give the authorisation for access to the following detailed informa-tion:
– audit report and action plan.
The retailers and other users/certified companies automatically receiveaccess to the unlocked data by the certified company after the data hasbeen unlocked. Communication to retailers and other users is via asecure Web process which guarantees that only authorised retailersand other users/certified companies can view specific data of the certi-fied companies/suppliers.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 139
ANNEX 1
Cover page of the audit report
Logo of the certification body
IFS PACsecureVersion 1
Final Audit Report
Audited company: “Paper and Plastic Ltd”
Date of audit: 02.12./03.12.2012
Name and address of certification body
Accreditation number of the certification body
© IFS, October 2012
140 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
Explanations regarding the audit report
Evaluation of requirements
Result Explanation Points
A Full compliance 20 points
B (deviation) Almost full compliance 15 points
KO requirementscored with a B
Almost full compliance 15 points
C (deviation) Small part of the requirement has beenimplemented
5 points
D (deviation) Requirement has not been implemented –20 points
Major When there is a substantial failure tomeet the requirements of the Standard,which includes product safety and/or thelegal requirements of the production anddestination countries. A major can alsobe given when the identified non-con-formity can lead to a serious healthhazard. A major can be given to anyrequirement which is not defined as KO.
15% of thepossible totalamount of pointsis subtracted
KO requirementscored with a D
The KO requirement has not beenimplemented
50% of thepossible totalamount of pointsis subtracted
N/A Not applicableRequirement not applicable fora company
N/A requirementswill be excludedfrom the finalscoring
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 141
Scoring and awarding of certificates
Audit result Status Action company Report form Certificate
At least 1 KOscored with D
Not approved Actions and newinitial audit to beagreed upon
Report givesstatus
No
>1 Majorand/or <75%of therequirementsare fulfilled
Not approved Actions and newinitial audit to beagreed upon
Report givesstatus
No
Max 1 Majorand ≥75% ofthe require-ments arefulfilled
Not approvedunless furtheractions takenand validatedafter follow-up audit
Send completedaction planwithin 2 weeksof receiving thepreliminarilyreport. Follow-upaudit max.6 months afterthe audit date
Report includ-ing actionplan givesstatus
Certificate atfoundationlevel, if theMajor non-conformity isfinally solvedas controlledduring thefollow-upaudit
Total score is≥75% and<95%
Approved atfoundation IFSPACsecurelevel afterreceipt of theaction plan
Send completedaction planwithin 2 weeksof receiving thepreliminarilyreport.
Report includ-ing actionplan givesstatus
Yes, certifi-cate atfoundationlevel,12 monthsvalidity
Total score is≥95%
Approved athigher IFSPACsecurelevel afterreceipt of theaction plan
Send completedaction planwithin 2 weeksof receiving thepreliminarilyreport.
Report includ-ing actionplan givesstatus
Yes, certifi-cate at higherlevel,12 monthsvalidity
© IFS, October 2012
142 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
First pages of the audit report
IFS PACsecureVersion 1, October 2012
Audit Overview
Audit details
Lead auditor:
Mr. Müller
Co-auditor:
Ms. Lehmann
Trainee:
Mr. Schubert
Date/time of current audit:
02.12.2012(09:00–18:00)
03.12.2012(08:30–17:30)
Date/time of previous audit:
07.12.2011 (09:00–18:00)08.12.2011 (08:30–17:30)
CB and auditor of previous audit:
TEST GmbH/FrankTest
Name and address of the company (or headquarter)
Perfect PackagingExample street12345WitzenhausenGermany
Name and address of the audited site
Paper and Plastic LtdMusterstraße12346 BerlinGermany
EAN Code/UCC Global Location NumberCOID
Phone:
0123456Fax:
0123456789Phone:
0123457Fax:
0123456788
Scope of audit
Production of paper and PE foilProduct scope(s): 1, 3
Audit participants
Name: Position: Openingmeeting
Documentationreview
Site assess-ment (Audit):
Closingmeeting
Mr. Quality QualityManager
X X X X
Mr. Manager GeneralManager
X X
Mr.Transport TransportManager
X X X
Final Result of Audit
As a result of the audit performed on 02.12. and 03.12.2012, “xyz” foundthat the processing activities of Paper and Plastic Ltd for the above-mentioned scope of production comply with the requirements set out inthe IFS PACsecure, Version 1, at Foundation Level, with a score of XX%.
Next audit in12 months
Company profile
Compulsory informationIn case of reduction of audit duration, explanations of the reasons:
Reviewer:
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 143
ANNEX 2
IFS PACsecureVersion 1, October 2012
Audit Report
Result:The processing activities of company “Paper and Plastic Ltd” met therequirements of the IFS PACsecure, version 1.
The company passed with a score of XX% at:
Foundation (Higher) level…%
Date of renewal audit: between the XX/XX and the XX/XX.
Summary:
Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6
Seniormanagementresponsibility
Quality andpackagingmaterial safetymanagementsystem
Resourcemanagement
Planning andproductionprocess
Measure-ments,analysis,improvements
Packagingmaterialdefense/Food defenseand externalinspections
KO 0 0 0 0 0 0
Majors 0 0 0 0 0 0
A 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 0 0 0 0 0 0
C 0 0 0 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0
Observations regarding KO’s and Majors:
General summary table for all chapters:
Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Total0%
20%10%
30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
© IFS, October 2012
144 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
Overall summary of the audit:
Description of follow up of corrective actions from the previousaudit:
Chapter 1: Senior management responsibility
Summary of all Chapter 1 deviations and non-conformities found:
N° Reference IFS requirements Evaluation Explanation
1. 1.1.1
2. 1.1.2
Report of the N/A evaluations
N° Reference IFS requirements Evaluation Explanation
1.
Detailed audit report
N° Reference IFS requirements Evaluation Explanation
1.
2.
© IFS, October 2012
International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1 Part 4 145
ANNEX 3
Action plan
Name and address of the audited company
The Corrective Action Plan must be returned to the certification bodybefore: ___________________________________________________________
Requirementnumber
IFSPACsecurerequirement
Evaluation Explanation(by theauditor)
Correctiveaction(by thecompany)
Responsibility/Date/Status ofimplementation(by thecompany)
Releaseby theauditor
© IFS, October 2012
146 Part 4 International Featured Standards · IFS PACsecure ·Version 1
ANNEX 4
CERTIFICATEHerewith the certification body
Name of the certification body
being an ISO/IEC 17065 accredited certification body for IFS certificationand having signed an agreement with the IFS owner,
confirms that the processing activities of
Name of the audited companyAddress
COID(Headquarter)
for the audit scope:(detailed descriptions of processes/products plus, if relevant, trade products)
Name and number of the product scope(s)
meet the requirements set out in the
IFS PACsecureVersion 1, October 2012
at Foundation level/Higher Levelwith a score of XX% (if required)
Certificate – register number: ________________________________________________
Audit date: ________________________________________________(If relevant: date of follow up audit)
Date of issue of certificate: ________________________________________________
Certificate valid until: ________________________________________________
Next audit to be performed within the time period: ______________________________(specify soonest and latest audit date, according to requirements of audit protocol, Part 1)
Date and place
Name and signature ofthe responsible personat the certification body
Address of thecertification body
Logo of the accreditationbody or its name andregistration number
IFS publishes information, opinions and bulletins to its best knowledge, but cannot takeany responsibility for any mistakes, omissions or possibly misleading information in itspublications, especially in this document.
The Standard owner of the present document is:
IFS Management GmbHAmWeidendamm 1A10117 BerlinGermany
Managing Director: Stephan TrompAG Charlottenburg HRB 136333 BVAT-N°: DE278799213
Bank: Berliner SparkasseBank code number: 10050000Account number: 190029765IBAN number: DE96100500000190029765BIC-/Swift-Code: BE LA DE BE
All rights reserved. All publications are protected under international copyright laws.With-out the expressed written consent of the IFS Standard owner any kind of unauthorised useis prohibited and subject to legal action.This also applies to the reproduction with a photo-copier, the inclusion into an electronic database/software, or the reproduction on CD-Rom.
No translation may be made without official permission by the IFS Standard owner.
The IFS PACsecure is available online via:www.ifs-certification.com
Or by Mail, Fax and E-mail:IFS Management GmbHAmWeidendamm 1A10117 BerlinGermany
Phone: +49-(0)30-726250-74Fax: +49-(0)30-726250-79E-mail: [email protected]
GERMANY | BERLINIFS Management GmbHAmWeidendamm 1AD-10117 BerlinPhone: +49(0)3072625074Fax: +49(0)3072625079E-mail: [email protected]
FRANCE | PARISIFS Office ParisFCD12, rue EulerF-75008 ParisPhone: +33(0)144439916Fax: +33(0)147205353E-mail: [email protected]
ITALY | MILANIFS Office MilanFederdistribuzioneVia Albricci 8I-20122 MilanoPhone: +39(0)289075150Fax: +39(0)26551169E-mail: [email protected]
POLAND |WARSAWIFS Office Central & Eastern Europeul. Serwituty 25PL-02-233WarsawPhone: +48601957701E-mail: [email protected]
BRAZIL | DOURADOSRepesentante IFS BrasilCaroline NowakBR-79824 Dourados, MSPhone: +55(67)81514560E-mail: [email protected]
CHINA | HEFEIStarFarmRoom 2301, C building,Fortune Plaza No. 278 Suixi Road, 230041,Hefei, Anhui, ChinaPhone: +86(0)5515666069Fax: +86(0)5515681376E-mail: [email protected]
USA | ST. LOUISIFS Americas1610 Des Peres Road, Suite 150St. Louis, MO 63131USAPhone: +13146864610Fax: +13146864602E-mail: [email protected]
CONTACT DETAILS OF THE IFS OFFICES
CONTACT DETAILS OF THE PACKAGINGASSOCIATION OF CANADA (PAC)
THE PACKAGINGASSOCIATION | CANADA1 Concorde Gate, Suite 607Toronto ONM3C 3N6CanadaPhone: +14164907860E-mail: [email protected]
IFS PACsecureStandard for auditing quality andsafety of packaging materials
Version 1October 2012© IFS, October 2012