IFA Mauritius

7/28/2019 IFA Mauritius

1/22

INTERNATIONAL TAX DEVELOPMENTS

- GLOBAL & REGIONAL- INDIA

IFA Conference - Mauritius

10th & 11th May 2012

CA P.V.S.S.Prasad

Hyderabad, India

[email protected]


2/22

Page 2

AGENDA

FINANCE BILL 2012INTERNATIONAL TAX PROPOSALS

ROYALTIES

WITHHOLDING TAXES

TAX RESIDENCY CERTIFICATE (TRC)

ADVANCE PRICING AGREEMENT (APA)

GENERAL ANTI AVOIDANCE RULE (GAAR)

INDIAMAURITIUS TAX TREATY (DTAA)


3/22

Page 3

ROYALTY S.9(1)(vi) of IT Act 1961.

Explanation 2 to clause (vi) of sub-section (1) of section 9 : Royal ty"means consideration (including any lump sum consideration but excluding any consideration

which would be the income of the recipient chargeable under the head "Capital gains") for

(i) The transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a license) in respect of a patent, invention,model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property;

(ii) The imparting of any information concerning the working of or the use of, a patent, invention, model,

design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property;(iii) The use of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar

property;

(iv) The imparting of any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or

scientific knowledge, experience or skill;

(iva)the use or right to use any industrial, commercial or scientific equipment but not including the

amounts referred to in section 44BB;(v) The transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a license) in respect of any copyright, literary,artistic or scientific work including films or video tapes for use in connection with television or tapes for usein connection with radio broadcasting, but not including consideration for the sale, distribution or exhibitionof cinematographic films; or

(vi) The rendering of any services in connection with the activities referred to in sub-clauses (i) to (v);


4/22

Page 4

ROYALTY Finance Bill 2012

Amendments in Finance Bill 2012: (retro.) 01/06/1976

Explanation 4.Consideration for transfer of all or any right for use or right to use a

computer software, (including grant of a licence) irrespective of medium of transfer,

constitutes royalty u/s 9 (1) (vi)

Case laws neutralised: DIT Vs. Ericson A.B., New Delhi, (2011) 16 taxmann.com 371 (Delhi),

Motorola inc (SB) 95 ITD 269

Explanation 5. Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) includes consideration in respect of any right,

property or information, whether or not its possession or control with the taxpayer, it is

used directly by the taxpayer, or its location is in India.

Case law neutralised: DIT Vs. Ericson A.B., New Delhi, (2011) 16 taxmann.com 371 (Delhi)


5/22

Page 5

ROYALTY Finance Bill 2012

Explanation 6.Term process u/s 9(1)(Vi) includes transmission by satellite

(including up-linking, amplification, conversion for downlinking of any

signal), cable, optic fibre or by any other similar technology, whether or not

such process is a secret.

Case law neutralised:Asia Satellite Telecommunication Co. Ltd. 332 ITR 340

(Del)


6/22

Page 6

ROYALTY OECD MCC

Paras 1217 of the MCC on Art.12 provides guidance as to what is

royalty/ business profitssoftware payments.

Amndt. makes sale of copyrighted article resulting in royalty under

domestic law (Expln-4).

Payment for information/ databases is royalty- domestic law

Amndt.(Expln.5)

Transmission by satellite is a process whether or not a

secretdomestic lawAmndt. (Expln.6)- whether or not in

the possession / control of payer (Expln.5)royalty.

- para 9.1 of Art.12 of MCC holds otherwise.

Most software payments/telecom services come within tax net unless protected

by treaty or source rule exclusion u/s 9(1)(vi)(b)/(c) of domestic law


7/22

Page 7

Sec.195 Withholding Taxes

Explanation 2 to Sec.195 (1)

Obligation to deduct tax u/s 195((1) applicable to all persons, whether resident or nonresident,

whether or not the nonresident has a residence, place of business or business connection in India: or

any other presence in any manner whatsoever.

Applicable retrospectively from April 1, 1962:

Case law neutralised: Vodafone International Holdings BV Vs UOI 341 ITR 1 (SC)

payments from nonresident to another nonresident covered without exceptions

I nsertion of S.s 7 to Sec.195

To provide that class of persons or cases (to be notified by CBDT) responsible for making payment to

a nonresident, whether or not such payment is chargeable under the Act, shall make an application

to the AO to determine the appropriate proportion of sum chargeable.

Case law neutralised: GE India Technology Centre P.Ltd 327 ITR 456 (SC)

unwelcome compliance burden running contrary to the principle of charging section affecting

nonresident payees.


8/22

Page 8

Tax Residency Certificate (TRC)

Sec. 90 & 90A amended to provide that a nonresident to whom tax

treaty applies shall necessarily obtain a certificate with prescribed

particulars from the Govt. of such country of which he is a resident.

TRC essential to claim relief under treaty, but not a sufficient conditionfor availing benefits.

Effective from financial year 2012-13.

CBDT cir. 786 providing that Mauritian TRC was sufficient to avail

benefits of IndoMauritius DTAA was upheld by SC in Azadi Bachao

case , now neutralisedVodafone case followed for amendment.


9/22

Page 9

Advance Pricing Agreement

Insertion of Sec. 92CC and 92 CDAdvance Pricing Agreement

(APA) - Effective from 1st July 2012 in relation to intl.

transactions.

- Board to enter into APAs with approval of Central Govt.

- ALP/ manner to compute ALP

- void if obtained by fraud/ change in law

- modified return on basis of APA

APA shall be valid for such years- in no case shall exceed five

consecutive years.


10/22

Page 10

Advance Pricing Agreement

Board to prescribe scheme- forms , procedure etc.

Unilateral / bilateral APAs ?

How effective the Directorate would be is the key for success

Provides certainty for the future

Reduction of double taxation not certain unless bilateral APA


11/22

Page 11

GAAR

Insertion of ChapterXASec.95-102- General Anti Avoidance Rule

The provisions of this Chapter may apply to any step in, or a part of, the

arrangement.

Impermissible avoidance arrangement (IAA) means an arrangement, the main

purpose or one of the main purposes of which is to obtain a tax benefit and it

- creates rights and obligationsnot at arms length

- results in abuse/misuse- provisions of this Act.

- lacks/ deemed to lack commercial substance- not ordinarily applied forbona fidepurposes


12/22

Page 12

GAAR

Presumptiontax benefit- main purpose- unless proved otherwise.

Even if a step in, or a part of, the arrangement, is to obtain tax benefit, - main

purpose gets tainted.

Deemed to lack commercial substance if

- substance/ effect of arrangement as a whole differs

significantly from individual steps

- round trip financing

- accommodating party

- offsetting/ cancelling each other

- disguises the value, location, source, ownership

- location of asset/ residence of any party for obtaining tax benefit


13/22

Page 13

GAAR

Following not to be considered for commercial substance

- period for which the arrangement exists

- payment of taxesdirectly/ indirectly

- fact that an exit route is provided

criteria for substance test of Vodafone case overruled

Consequencesnot exhaustive

- disregard / combine / recharacterise any step in/ part or whole

- treating IAA as not entered into

- disregard accommodating party

- deeming persons connectedas all one and the same


14/22

Page 14

GAAR

Consequencesnot exhaustive

- reallocation among the parties to the arrangement

any accrual, receipt, expenditure etc.

- place of residence/ situs of asset to be determined- look through any corporate structure

- equity may be treated as debt or vice-versa

- capital as revenue and vice-versa

Guidelines/ procedure to be prescribed.

Board has formed a six member committee to draft guidelines etc.


15/22

Page 15

GAAR v. DTAA

Section 90(2) provides for opting for IT provisions only when

more beneficial

Position judicially recognised in 263 ITR 706 SC and 267 ITR654 SC

Section 90(2A) provides that notwithstanding anything contained

in sec 90(2), provisions of Chapter X-A to apply to the assessee,

even if such provisions are not beneficial to himto override tax

treaty.


16/22


17/22

Page 17

Latest Case law Indo Mauritius Tax treaty

Subsidiary of UK coy in Mauritius held shares in India coy, sold the same to German coy

and claimed exemption of capital gains in India as per Article 13(4) of DTAA. Revenue

argued that beneficial owner is UK coy and claimed that IndoUK tax treaty would

applyAAR held that as per Azadi Bachaos case of SC shares sold by Mauritius sub is

exempt from capital gains in India per Art.13(4)

- Ardex Investments Mauritius Ltd., in re [2011] 16 taxmann.com 84 (AAR)

Mauritius shareholder in an Indian coy transferred shares pursuant to a buy back

arrangement whereas other shareholders i.e. US & Singapore coys did not subscribe to

the share buy back. No dividend paid by Indian coy since 2003 and allowed the reserves

to grow in view of DDT. AAR accepted Revenues contention that buy back scheme is a

tax avoidance scheme and held the same as colorable device. Income from buy back was

held to be taxable in India as dividends and disallowed claim of capital gains exemption

under Art.13(4) of DTAA

- XYZ India in re [2012] 20 taxmann.com 89 (AAR)


18/22

Page 18

Latest Case law Indo Mauritius Tax treaty

Sale of compulsory convertible debentures (CCDs)(Issued by India coy) by

Mauritius coy was claimed as exempt from capital gains under Art.13(4) of

DTAA. AAR applied Look at test of Vodafone ruling to lift corporate veil

and found subsidiary to be puppet of holding company and denied exemption

under DTAA. Held that sale of CCDs would result in accrual of interest and

thereby taxable by under Art.11 of DTAA

-Z Mauritius [2012] 20 taxmann.com 91 (AAR-New Delhi)


19/22

Page 19

Indo Mauritius tax treaty - way forward

Vodafone case Look at principle being applied as substance test in denying

treaty benefits

GAAR would be invoked in all DTAA cases where substance is poor

GAAR wider than LOB

Any person claiming benefits of DTAA must establish

Commercial substance

legitimacy of Mauritius entity

Activity report of Mauritius entity

More economic activity expected in Mauritius through intermediate holding

coys in future.


20/22

Page 20


Finance Secretary R.S. Gujral clarified in an interview on GAAR provisions

- FIIsLong term capital gains - no issue as there is no tax in India.

- FIIs - Short term capital gains taxable if no tangible activity/trading in Mauritius -

becomes impermissible arrangement and GAAR would apply - overriding DTAA -

if tax paid GAAR would not be invoked.

- GAAR is only prospective w.e.f 1st April, 2012 - no reopening of old assessments.

- Onus of proof on tax payer - however many safeguards like permission from Commissioner

and then further reference to GAAR panel are proposed in the Bill.

- Whether GAAR panel includes independent third party is being examined.

Representation by various Chambers to attach onus on the Revenue to prove that

there is impermissible arrangement, lest every transaction would be questioned.

TRC - Azadi Bachaos case overruled by GAAR and amended S.90/90A.


21/22

Page 21


News Flash

- Govt. may dilute GAAR regulations by prescribing thresh hold of

150 million rupees ($2.9 million)

- Govt. may defer implementation of GAAR by one year

- Fin.min official says that the Govt. did not have Participatory

Notes(PN) of FIIs in mind when introduced provisions in Budget

regarding underlying asset transfersno capital gains tax

- Finance Minister said that he may modify some provisions of

GAAR

- Substantial commercial interest in Mauritius critical for

availing treaty benefits

(SourceEconomic Times)


22/22

Page 22 35

THANKYOU

IFA Mauritius

Documents

Transcript of IFA Mauritius