If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

15
If all of your cells had a mut in an important gene, why could that be bad?

Transcript of If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

Page 1: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

If all of your cells had a mutationin an important gene, whycould that be bad?

Page 2: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

Chromosomes-• Each chromosome is made of many genes.

Genes-• Each gene holds a sequence to be transcribed and translated into a protein.

• A gene is an instruction for a protein to be made by your body.

Page 3: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

• All cells in you have the SAME genetic code.• only read certain genes to tell them what that cell should do

• When a new cell is made…• these cells differentiate, turning on/off different parts of DNA to make them a specific type of cell

Page 4: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

• DNA is the code of life

• BUT- it cannot leave the nucleus, AND it is written in the wrong language

• You need something to COPY and TRANSLATE it!

Page 5: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

RNA (the copier)-• Single-stranded ribonucleic acid acts to bring the DNA’s message to the ribosome, telling it what protein to make.

Only two difference-• In RNA, no T. Instead, has U • Single-, not double-stranded

Page 6: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

3 types• rRNA (ribosomal RNA)• makes up ribosomes

• *mRNA (messenger RNA)• brings DNA’s code to ribosome

• *tRNA (transfer RNA)• brings amino acids to ribosome for protein construction

Page 7: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

• DNA used as a template• DNA opens in part, and each “gene” is used as a template for an mRNA strand to be constructed

• mRNA read in 3-letter sequences by the ribosome

Animation of Transcription

Page 8: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

RNA goes to the Ribosome (the translatorRNA is “translated” into a protein

• each coded tRNA brings with it an amino acid to add to the protein

Animation of Translation

Page 9: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

A change in a genetic sequence.

This can result in a change in the three-letter sequence, which results in differentamino acids being added, and the wrongprotein made

Page 10: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

Point mutations-• A single DNA nucleotide is changed, resulting in one wrong codon being produced.

AAT AAG would add L instead of A to the amino acid chain.

Page 11: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

Frame-shift mutations• Insertion or deletion• One nucleotide is either added or removed from the sequence, resulting in a change in all of the codons that result in the chain.

ATT GCC CTG GAT TAC

ATT CGC CCT GGA TTA C

Page 12: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

Lac gene:• When glucose present, lac (lactose) gene is off (use glucose instead of lactose for energy

• When no glucose, lac gene turns back on to use other sugars (lactose) to | make energy

Page 13: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

In many cases, the environment anorganism is in will change its geneticexpression.• Some will turn genes on, some will turn genes off

• **Your DNA doesn’t change, what does change is what genes are turned on and which are turned off

Page 14: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?

If a rabbit moves to a new locationand its fur color changes, has its DNA changed? Explain?

Page 15: If all of your cells had a mutation in an important gene, why could that be bad?