IEA MOST Workshop: Advances in deployment of fossil fuel technology Beijing June … · 2019. 11....
26
IEA – MOST Workshop: Advances in deployment of fossil fuel technology Beijing June 25, 2014
Transcript of IEA MOST Workshop: Advances in deployment of fossil fuel technology Beijing June … · 2019. 11....
IEA – MOST Workshop: Advances in deployment of fossil fuel technology
Beijing June 25, 2014
US DOE National Carbon Capture Center
Power Systems Development Facility (PSDF) started combustion testing June 1996 and gasification September 1999.
In May 2009, PSDF transitioned to the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC).
Existing facilities used to support development of pre-combustion CO2 capture and gasification technologies.
Additional facility, the Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Center (PC4) built and started testing March 2011.
Located at adjacent power plant, Alabama Power’s Plant Gaston, which provides commercially representative flue gas for testing (hot ESP, SCR, and wet FGD).
Project Facts
Performance Period 10/01/2008 to 09/30/2014
Total Project Value $251M DOE $201M Non-DOE $50M
Award Number DE-NT0000749
Performance Period 5/01/2014 to 04/30/2019
Total Project Value $188M DOE $150M Non-DOE $38M
Award Number DE-FE0022596
Confidential and Proprietary
Development
1-10 MWe
Demonstration
10-100+ MWe
Commercial
250 MWe +
Crist Clean Coal Project 1992-1995
9 MW
SEI Birchwood 1996 250 MW
18,000 MW 8,000 MW
Scholz 1978 23 MW
Yates Clean Coal 1992
100 MW
Miller 1995
1 MW Gaston 2&3 1996 &
2001 2*250 MW
Research
< 0.1 MWe
Daniel 2009 SECARB II 3000 tons
Barry 500 tpd 2011 - 2014
25MW
Citronelle 2009 - 2020 SECARB III 100k tpy
Citronelle 2009 - 2023 SECARB III
1M tpy
National Carbon Capture
Center
Coal-based Technology Development Directly Resulting from DOE/Southern Company R&D Partnership
Industry Southern
100,000 MW 11,000 MW
8,000 MW* 1,600 MW
• Denotes estimate • provided by EPRI
Kemper 3 MM tpd
2014 - 2054 584MW
500 MW
325,000 MW 22,000 MW
SCR systems
FGD systems
Baghouse w/
activated carbon
Carbon Dioxide
(Capture & Storage)
Low NOx burners Smith Clean Coal 1992 180 MW
Hammond Clean Coal 1991
500 MW
National Carbon Capture Center (NC3)
Gasification Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture
Post-Combustion CO2 Capture
Role of NCCC
Time
Pro
gres
s to
Co
mm
erci
aliz
atio
n
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
Fundamental R&D
Tech transfer to power
plant slipstream unit
e.g. Plant Barry
Full deployment Role of
NCCC
Pre-Combustion Facilities
Parr Rx
Original SCU
Control Room
MTR small CO2 and H2 membranes
WPI MPT
Gas Analyzer Building
MTR 230 kg/hr CO2 membrane Syngas
Conditioning
Module Testing: Tech Dev 1 TDA SRI International Clariant JM
OSU Chem Looping
Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture Site Overview
Transport
Gasifier
Syngas
Cooler
Particulate
Filter
Atmospheric
Syngas
Combustor
To Stack
High Temp
Mercury Sorbent
CO2 Batch Reactor
Low Temp
Polymeric CO2 &
H2 Membranes
High Temp Pd-
Based H2
Membrane
High Temp
CO2 Sorbent
High Temp
Carbon-Based
H2 Membrane
CO2 Membrane &
Solvent
Syngas Conditioning Unit
Syngas
Take-Off
Syngas Cooler
WGS
ReactorCooling &
Cleaning System
50 lb/hr
10 lb/hr
50 lb/hr
50 lb/hrWGS
Reactor
Desulfur-
ization
Reactors
Cooling &
Cleaning System500 lb/hr
50 lb/hr
Desulfur
-ization
Reactor
COS
Hydrolysis
Reactor
Gasification Process
Post Combustion Carbon Capture Center (PC4)
1. Akermin solvent
2. MTR membrane
3. SRI International sorbent
4. DOE sorbent
5. SSTU solvent
Bench-Scale Test Bays Pilot-Scale Test Bays
1. 0.6-MW PSTU solvent
2. 1.2-MW BASF/Linde solvent
3. 1.2-MW MTR membrane
Eight Test Bays for Technologies from 0.01 MW to 1.2 MW
3 2 1
Expanded PC4 Testing Capability
Codexis
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
• Carbonic anhydrase enzyme with MDEA • 65% capture • Rate of capture 25 times > than MDEA • No apparent effect of trace metals or
elevated process temperatures
Enzymes
Accomplishments PC4
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
• Immobilized Carbonic anhydrase enzyme with Potassium Carbonate
• Up to 90% capture • 7 fold increase in flow • Established low solvent
loss, demonstrated aerosol emissions below the detection limit
Enzymes
Accomplishments PC4
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
• Polymeric Polaris™ membrane, 1st and 2nd generation
• 2 modules, cross flow and countercurrent-swept
• 1 ton/day data being used for scale-up
Membranes
Accomplishments PC4
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
• Novel carbon sorbent • Free flowing, resistant
to attrition, low heat of reaction
• Demonstrated 90% capture
• Significant improvement in gas/sorbent disengagement
Sorbents
Accomplishments PC4
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
• 0.25 MW Mobile Test Unit • 2,400 hours of operation • Successfully evaluate
reductions in solvent and degradation emissions from absorber
Solvent Process
Accomplishments PC4
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
• Nominal 1000 hours of operation
• Target 90% capture • Parametric tests up to
100 conditions • Solvent degradation,
emissions, regeneration energy, corrosion, metal accumulation
Solvents
Accomplishments PC4
Lab
Scale
Component
Validation
Process
Development
Unit
Commercial Demonstration Large Pilot
Solvent Process
Membranes
Cost Reduction for Carbon Capture - example
MTR – Membrane • 1 TPD Unit – 9000 hrs of operation 20 TPD Unit – Starting this year • Improved performance (permeance)
- Coating application thinner - Coating materials
• Module cost - Low cost components - Membrane casting improvements - Production automation - Use of multi-insert module vessels
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 1,000 10,000
Change
in COE
(%)
Membrane CO2 permeance (gpu)
1st
Generation
Polaris
2nd
Generation
Polaris
MEA (DOE Case 10)
DOE Target
Advanced
Polaris
MTR membrane process assuming $50/m2
Develop 2nd-Generation technologies that: • Are ready for demonstration in the 2020–2025 timeframe
(with commercial deployment beginning in 2025) • Achieve capture costs of approximately $40/tonne of CO2 captured
• Pilot Testing of a Membrane System for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture at NCCC, DOE-NCCC Review Meeting, March 12, 2014
• Hosted 20 developers testing 24 different technologies
– Tested innovative technologies emerging from NETL and ARPA-E development programs, as well as developers worldwide funded internationally
– Provided reliable data to support continued development of their technologies.
Accomplishments
Designed and built unique R&D facility and assembled a world class staff
• For pre-combustion/gasification
• In last five years, 12 gasification test runs for 8,700 hours on coal
• More than 20,000 hours combined testing of technologies
• For post-combustion tested more than 22,800 hours of testing
International CCS Test Center Network
Accelerate carbon capture technology development by sharing lessons learned between the world’s leading test centers
• Build confidence with targeted groups outside the CCS community by sharing positive stories from its research efforts
• Experts sharing knowledge in a private fashion • Knowledge sharing among a core group of
participants that operate large, technology-independent test centers
• Established knowledge sharing techniques
TCM - Mongstad
SaskPower – Boundary Dam
Eon - Maasvlakte
NCCC
Principals
Clear outcomes • The network will focus on solving problems in a collaborative way. Analysis and
problem solving should be the focus of the network, not data collection. • We will clearly identify knowledge gaps and specific areas of focus.
Practical approaches will be taken to information sharing • The network will share non-confidential information • We will leverage the large amounts of public information already available.
Digital technology for better connectivity • The network will use digital technologies for international knowledge sharing.
Financial sustainability • Through common digital technologies and by collecting non-confidential
information only the costs for running the network will be manageable.
Criteria Participant Type
Core
Organization
Participating
Organization
Participating
Individual
Operating a capture facility connected to a coal or gas fired
power plant or an industrial plant X
Willing to provide fee payments as described below. X
Willing to host visitors for a site tour as its site facility
(restrictions to be communicated by the test center) X
Aiming to be as neutral as possible in technology decisions X X
Willing to share non-confidential knowledge and jointly work
together to solve joint problems X X X
Has appropriate subject matter expertise X X X
Will sign off on appropriate procedures for knowledge sharing X X X
Criteria for Joining
Description Priority
Health, safety &
environment
Sharing good practice in health, safety and environment. High
Laboratory
methods
Establishing recognized methods for sampling and analysis
High
Monitoring &
instrumentation
Sharing experience with measurement, monitoring and
instrumentation. High
Waste
management
Sharing experience with reclaimer units and the removal and / or
treatment of waste. High
Benchmarking
The definition of standard methods necessary and proper key
performance indicators, such as energy consumption per tonne of
CO2 captured. Will apply to currently tested processes only
High /
Medium
Scale-up Risks and lessons learnt regarding challenges around scaling up a
test center Medium
Topics for Knowledge Sharing
Description Priority
Technology
verification Verifying that the technology being tested does as is claimed
Medium /
Low
Harmonization of
requirements
Accelerating technology development through harmonization of
testing requirements. This is rated as low priority as harmonization
of requirements across test centers is unlikely to be achieved.
Low
Operational
experience
Sharing experience with common equipment such as pumps,
compressors and heat exchangers.
Low
Regulations Sharing experience with legislation and regulatory framework
conditions. Low
Technology
Screening studies
Assessing what companies are leading in capture technology and
should be used as potential candidates for technology testing.
Screening studies have been defined as technologies that have the
potential to be implemented in future (beyond 5 years)
Low
Topics for Knowledge Sharing
