IEA HPP Annex 41 Cold Climate Heat Pumps: Improving ...web.ornl.gov/~jacksonwl/hpdm/Annex 41 - 2015...

19
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy IEA HPP Annex 41 – Cold Climate Heat Pumps: Improving Low Ambient Temperature Performance of Air- Source Heat Pumps Tandem, single-speed compressor air-source heat pump system laboratory and preliminary field test results Bo Shen, Keith Rice, Omar Abdelaziz Oak Ridge National Laboratory August 19, 2015

Transcript of IEA HPP Annex 41 Cold Climate Heat Pumps: Improving ...web.ornl.gov/~jacksonwl/hpdm/Annex 41 - 2015...

ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle

for the US Department of Energy

IEA HPP Annex 41 –

Cold Climate Heat

Pumps: Improving

Low Ambient

Temperature

Performance of Air-

Source Heat Pumps

Tandem, single-speed compressor air-source heat pump system laboratory and preliminary field test results

Bo Shen, Keith Rice, Omar Abdelaziz

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

August 19, 2015

2 Presentation_name

Contents

1. Background

2. Lab Testing

3. Field investigation

4. Summary

Target Market: Replace electric resistance heat in cold climates.

3 Presentation_name

1.1 Background

Problem Statement: • Typical ASHPs don’t work

well at low ambient temps due to very high discharge temp and pressure ratio

• Single-speed ASHP heating capacity not sufficient to match building load

• COP degrades significantly with ambient temperature

Technical Goals (Project outputs): Develop a CCHP to minimize resistance heating • COP@ 8.3°C > 4.0; HP capacity@ -25°C > 75% of rated capacity@

8.3°C. • Maximize COPs at -8.3°C and -25°C with acceptable payback period.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

-23 -13 -3 7 17 27 37 47 57 67 77 87 97 107

Bu

ild

ing

Lo

ad

Lin

e a

nd

He

ati

ng

Ca

pa

cit

y o

f T

yp

ica

l A

SH

P a

nd

Ta

rge

t C

CH

P

Ambient Temperature [F]

Target CCHP Capacity Goals

Typical ASHP (HSPF=7.5)

Building Heating Load Line, Region V, Well-Insulated Home

Building Cooling Load Line, Region V, Well-Insulated Home

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Ax

is T

itle

Ambient Temperature [C]

Chart Title

Series1

4 Presentation_name

1.2 Extensive System Configurations

ORNL to assist in modeling, analysis,

component sizing, and performance

verification testing

Condenser

Evaporator

Fla

sh

Ta

nk

Scro

ll M

ulti-S

tag

e

Co

mp

resso

r

Vapor injection

with flash tank

Vapor injection

with economizer

Condenser

Evaporator

Eco

no

miz

er

HX

Scro

ll M

ulti-S

tag

e

Co

mp

resso

r

Ejector cycle

Condenser

Evaporator

Tandem

Compressors

Tandem (parallel) and multi-

capacity compressor(s)

Single-stage compression concepts:

Condenser

Evaporator

Ejector

Co

mp

resso

r

Fla

sh

Ta

nk

Condenser

Evaporator

Eco

no

miz

er

HX

High Stage VS

Compressor

Low Stage

Compressor

Two-stage (series)

compression w/

inter-stage

economizing

5 Presentation_name

1.3 Compare Different Design Options

Over-capacity is the key to meet the 75% capacity goal, i.e. using tandem compressors. Vapor injection boosts HP COP at -25°C.

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Performance Ratio @ -13F versus Nominal @ 47F

Capacity

Integrated COP

6 Presentation_name

2.1 ‘More Cost Effective’ Configuration

Condenser

Evaporator

EXV

TXV

Filter/Dryer

Fan

Fan

4-W

ay

Valv

e

Suction Line Accumulator

Tandem

Compressors

For space

cooling

For space

heating

• Use two identical, single-speed compressors, specially optimized for heating mode , tolerate up to 138°C discharge temperature.

• Use a single compressor to match cooling load, and heating load at moderately cold temperatures, turn on both compressors at low ambient temperatures when needed.

• (Suction line accumulator+ EXV discharge temperature control) facilitates charge optimization in a wide ambient temperature range. using TXV and optimizing charge for heating mode is an alternative.

7 Presentation_name

2.2 ‘Premium’ Configuration

• Equal Tandem, Vapor Injection Compressors + Inter-stage Flash Tank + EXV Discharge Temperature Control .

Condenser

Evaporator

Fixed

orifice

TXV

Filter/Dryer

Compressor Unit

Fan

Fan

Fla

sh

Ta

nk

Sight Glass

Oil Separator

Oil

Filt

er

4-W

ay V

alv

e

Liquid Receiver

Hand Valve

Sight Glass

P T

P T

P T

P T

EXV

8 Presentation_name

2.3 Lab Measured Heating Capacities

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

-23 -13 -3 7 17 27 37 47 57 67

HP

Air

Sid

e H

eat

ing

Cap

acit

y [k

Btu

/h]

Outdoor Air Temperature [F]

2 Comps-VI

2 Comps-1 Speed

1 Comp-VI

1 Comp-1 Speed

Load_DHRmax_V

Load_DHRmin_V

0

5

10

15

20

25

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20

Hea

ting

Cap

acit

y [k

W]

Ambient Temperature [C]

Series1

0

5

10

15

20

25

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20

He

atin

g C

ap

acit

y [

kW

]

Ambient Temperature [C]

Series1

Eliminate Strip Heat in Well-Insulated Homes, Region V

9 Presentation_name

2.4 Lab Measured Heating COPs

• The ‘premium’ system with tandem VI compressors achieved 5% better COPs than the ‘more cost-effective’ single-speed compressor version at various ambients.

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

-23 -13 -3 7 17 27 37 47 57 67

HP

Air

Sid

e C

OP

[W

/W]

Outdoor Air Temperature [F]

Heating COP vs. OD Temp

1 Comp-VI

1 Comp-1 Speed

2 Comps-VI

2 Comps-1 Speed

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

Ax

is T

itle

Ambient Temperature [C]

Chart Title

Series1

10 Presentation_name

2.5 HSPF (DHRmin = 11.7kW) – AHRI

210/240

Heating Season Ratings, Region: IV [HSPF in W/W; OD design

temperature -15°C]

‘More Cost-Effective’ ‘Premium’ Case

3.29 3.47 Based on DHRmin

3.21 3.46 Based on DHRmax

Heating Season Ratings, Region: V [HSPF in W/W; OD design temperature

-23.3°C]

‘More Cost-Effective’ ‘Premium’ Case

2.94 3.13 Based on DHRmin

2.81 2.96 Based on DHRmax

11 Presentation_name

3.1 Field Testing of a ‘More Cost-

Effective’ System

Field testing in OH-outdoor unit, at a

residential home having a design

cooling load of 3-ton (10.6 kW)

-Indoor Unit and Data Acquisition,

record data point every half minute.

Insulated compressors’ shell

12 Presentation_name

3.2 Parameters of Field Testing Unit

Parameters (heating mode)

Indoor Fin-&-Tube Coil Outdoor Fin-&-Tube Coil

Face area, ft2 (m2) 3.30 (0.307) 22.3 (2.07)

Total Tube Number 84 64

Number of rows 3 (cross counter-flow) 2 (cross counter-flow)

Number of parallel circs 9 6

Fin density, fins/ft (fins/m)

168 (551) 264 (866)

Indoor Blower (High/Low1) Outdoor Fan

Flow Rate, cfm (m3/s) 1500/1250 (0.708/0.590) 3500 (1.652)

Power [W] 322/203 300

-the indoor and outdoor heat exchangers originally used for a 5-ton (17.7 kW) heat

pump, i.e. oversized for single-compressor operation (3-ton/10.6 kW).

-Power source: 240 V, 60 HZ, single-phase.

13 Presentation_name

3.3 Field Testing from February to May,

2015 (half winter)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Heat

Ener

gy De

liver

ed [%

J]

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

Build

ing H

eatin

g Loa

d [W

]

-Field ambient

temperature went

down to -24.4°C

(-12°F).

-Seasonal,

average, heating

COP was 3.16,

i.e. 10.8 HSPF.

-supplemental

resistance energy

use was 1.3% in

total heating

energy.

14 Presentation_name

3.4 Compressor Running Time Fractions

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Compressor Run Time Fractions

2 Comp Run Time Tot Comp Run Time

-The second compressor

cycled with 80% running

time, even at -25°C (having

room for more capacity).

-The second compressor

was needed at ambient

temperatures below -12°C.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

Hea

ting

Load

and

Cap

acity

[W]

Heat Load Capacity_1Comp Capacity_2Comp

15 Presentation_name

3.5 Resistance Energy Uses

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

Resistance Energy Ratio per Bin

Due to temperature setback schedule

-can be eliminated by changing the control and letting the second compressor run longer to match the temperature setting point.

16 Presentation_name

3.6 Heating COPs

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

CO

P [

w/w

]

Heat Pump COPs

COP_2Comp COP_1Comp Total COP

-Heat pump COP at 47°F (8.3°C) >3.5. -Heat pump COP at -13°F (-25°C) > 2.0. * Total COP includes resistance heat, cyclic and frost/defrost losses.

17 Presentation_name

3.7 Return and Supply Air Temperatures

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

">12.8C"

"12.8to 10C"

"10 to7.2C"

"7.2 to4.4C"

"4.4 to1.7C"

"1.7 to-1.1C"

"-1.1 to-3.9C"

"-3.9 to-6.7C"

"-6.7 to-9.4C"

"-9.4 to-12.2C"

"-12.2to -

15C"

"-15 to-17.8C"

"-17.8to -

20.6C"

"-20.6to -

23.3C"

"-23.3to -

26.1C"

Air

Te

mp

era

ture

[C

]

Heat Pump Return and Supply Air Temperatures

Return Air Temp Supply Air Temp

-Maintain 30°C supply air temperature at low ambient temperatures. * Temperature setting at 20°C (68°F) with 1.1K (2R) dead band.

18 Presentation_name

3.8 Defrost Frequency and Energy

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.8%

1.0%

1.2%

1.4%

1.6%

1.8%

2.0%

"12.8to 10C"

"10 to7.2C"

"7.2 to4.4C"

"4.4 to1.7C"

"1.7 to-1.1C"

"-1.1 to-3.9C"

"-3.9 to-6.7C"

"-6.7 to-9.4C"

"-9.4 to-12.2C"

"-12.2to -

15C"

"-15 to-17.8C"

"-17.8to -

20.6C"

"-20.6to -

23.3C"

"-23.3to -

26.1C"

Defrost Time Ratio to Bin Run Time

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

Defrost Load to Bin Heat Energy Delivered

Defrost frequency and energy were minimum for CCHP -With running one compressor, frost formation was slow, due to the oversized outdoor HX. -When the two compressors were needed at low ambients, the ambient humidity level was very low.

19 Presentation_name

4. Summary

• Over-capacity capability in a heat pump is the key to match the 75% capacity goal – tandem or variable-speed compressors are required.

• The tandem single-speed compressors had sufficient capacity to eliminate resistance heat down to -25°C during the field testing in Ohio.

• Proper charge control strategy is necessary to optimize heat pump operations at low ambient temperatures.

• Defrost losses were minimum during the field investigation.