Idealism
description
Transcript of Idealism
![Page 1: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Idealism
![Page 2: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Macbeth, Act I, scene i
Is this a dagger which I see before me, The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee. I have thee not, and yet I see thee still. Art thou not, fatal vision, sensible To feeling as to sight? or art thou but A dagger of the mind, a false creation, Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain?
![Page 4: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Hallucinations
Normally we talk as though we see physical things, out there in the world. “I see a dagger”– a dagger is obviously not mental. But what do I see when I hallucinate a dagger?
![Page 5: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Ideas
A popular view among 17th and 18th Century Western philosophers was that what you really saw was ideas– mental things.
On this view, ideas were something like little colored pictures in the mind.
![Page 6: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Idea Theory
Mind Idea of a Dagger
Dagger
![Page 7: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hallucination
Mind Idea of a Dagger
No Dagger
![Page 8: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Indirect Realism
Views of this general form are called “indirect realism.” What you directly see are mental entities (for example, ideas). You only indirectly see the real things that the ideas represent.
![Page 9: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Resemblance Theory
According to the resemblance theory of representation, ideas represent things by resembling them– sort of like how painting works.
![Page 10: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Painting
![Page 11: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mind Idea of a Dagger
Dagger
Resembles
Sees
![Page 12: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Resemblance
This means that even though what you see are ideas, the ideas are close copies of the real things, the way a realistic painting is a close copy of a scene.
![Page 13: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Corpuscularianism
In the 17th Century, corpuscularianim was the dominant scientific worldview. It held that all physical things are made of tiny little things called “corpuscles.”
The theory was very similar to Greek atomism, with the exception that atoms couldn’t be divided and corpuscles (in theory) could.
![Page 14: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Corpuscularianism
Part of the theory held that corpuscles only had shape, size, solidity, and motion.
They did not have color, taste, texture, smell, or heat, though they could cause us to experience these things by exciting our sense organs.
![Page 15: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mind Idea of a Dog Dog
Partly Resembles
Sees
![Page 16: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Terminology
Locke called properties like shape, size, and motion– properties that both ideas and real things could have– primary qualities.
Other properties that only ideas had were called secondary qualities.
![Page 17: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SUBJECTIVE IDEALISM
![Page 18: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
George Berkeley (1685-1753)
![Page 19: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
George Berkeley
George Berkeley was an Irish philosopher and Bishop in the Church of Ireland.
He advocated a view which we now call “subjective idealism.”
![Page 20: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Fun Fact
The town of Berkeley, California was named after Berkeley, inspired partly by the final stanza of Verses on the Prospect of Planting Arts and Learning in America, “Westward the course of empire takes its way;The first four Acts already past, A fifth shall close the Drama with the day; Time's noblest offspring is the last.”
![Page 21: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Subjective Idealism
Berkeley denied corpuscularianism and materialism, the idea that things were made out of corpuscles or matter.
Instead, Berkeley thought that things like tables, and mountains, and human bodies, were made out of ideas.
![Page 22: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Esse est Percipi
Berkeley’s slogan was “esse est percipi,” to be is to be perceived. Appearance = reality.
An idea only exists when a mind “perceives” the idea. Since tables and mountains are made out of ideas, they don’t exist until and unless someone perceives them.
![Page 23: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Berkeley’s Principles
Berkeley’s most important philosophical work is the Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Part I.
(Part II was lost on a trip to Italy, and Berkeley never re-wrote it.)
![Page 24: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Motivations
Berkeley had two main goals for his philosophical project. • First, he wanted to eliminate the skepticism
inherent in indirect realism (how can we know that the world is how our ideas say it is?).
• Second, he wanted to end philosophy and turn everyone’s attention to God.
![Page 25: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Argument that “Material Objects” are Really Made out of Ideas §4
(a) You can see a mountain/ hear a bird/ smell a rose/ taste a soup/ feel the rain(b) What you see are sights, what you hear are sounds, you smell smells, taste tastes, feel textures.(c) Sights, sounds, smells, etc. are ideas. (d) So mountains/ birds/ roses/ soups/ rain are all ideas.
![Page 26: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ARGUMENTS AGAINST MATERIALISM/ REALISM/ CORPUSCULARIANISM
![Page 27: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
For Berkeley and for the indirect realists, what you perceive directly are ideas.
Berkeley says that having an idea and perceiving an idea are the same thing: ‘To have an idea is all one as to perceive’ §7.
![Page 28: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Seeing = Imagining = Hallucinating
Mind Idea of a Dagger
![Page 29: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
With this assumption, Berkeley argues that you cannot imagine things that exist but are not perceived.
Since matter is supposed to be existent even when it is not perceived, Berkeley is arguing that we cannot imagine matter.
![Page 30: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Imagining a Lonely Tree
Mind Idea of a Dagger
![Page 32: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Imagining a Lonely Tree
Mind Idea of a Dagger
![Page 33: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
If we can’t even imagine matter, then it would seem weird to say that we believed in it.
![Page 34: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Second Argument
We cannot have ideas of things with no color, taste, smell, texture, etc.
Corpuscles, according to the theory, have no color, taste, smell, texture, etc.
Therefore we cannot have an idea of a corpuscle.
![Page 35: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
ALL QUALITIES ARE SECONDARY QUALITIES
![Page 36: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Secondary Qualities
Secondary qualities are the properties of ideas that are not also properties of material things.
According to Locke they were things like color, smell, taste, texture, and warmth or coldness.
Berkeley argues that actually all qualities are secondary: only ideas resemble ideas.
![Page 37: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
COLD HOTNORMAL
![Page 38: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
COLD HOTNORMAL
FEELS COLD
FEELS HOT
![Page 39: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
COLD HOTNORMAL
FEELS HOT
FEELS COLD
![Page 40: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Berkeley’s strategy is to use the same kind of “bucket” reasoning to show that all the properties that corpuscles are supposed to have– size, shape, and motion– are really secondary qualities.
![Page 41: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
That’s a SMALL elephant.
![Page 42: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
That’s a BIG elephant.
![Page 43: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Conclusion of the Argument
Berkeley concludes that size, shape, and motion are secondary qualities: properties of ideas, not of material objects.
So anything that has size or is shaped or moves is an idea. That’s pretty much everything.
![Page 47: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
THE ABDUCTIVE ARGUMENT FOR MATERIALISM/ REALISM
![Page 48: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The Abductive Argument
Here’s an argument against Berkeley:
“Look, the existence of a mind-independent reality is the best explanation for our experiences. If tables and chairs etc. were ‘just ideas’ that wouldn’t explain why everyone looking in the same place sees the same thing.”
![Page 49: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Reply: This requires that the physical objects cause our ideas. But no-one has any clue how physical-to-mental causation is supposed to work. So this can’t be the best explanation.
![Page 50: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Furthermore, according to corpuscularianism, our ideas are caused (mysteriously) by the shape size and motion of the corpuscles acting on our sensory organs. But:(a) Shape, size, and motion are ideas(b) Ideas are passive: they cannot cause a change in other ideas.__________________(c) Therefore, shape, size, and motion can’t cause a change in our ideas.
![Page 51: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Outstanding Issues
OK, but how can Berkeley explain:• The fact that our experiences are regular and
lawful.• The fact that our experiences are inter-
subjectively verified.• The fact that there’s a difference between
hallucination, imagination, and sensing.• The fact that tables and chairs exist even when
no one is perceiving them.
![Page 52: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Berkeley’s Metaphysics
![Page 53: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Regularity
![Page 54: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Inter-Subjectivity
![Page 55: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Hallucination
![Page 56: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Persistence
![Page 57: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Why Believe It?
(a) Ideas can’t cause ideas; they are passive(b) Physical substances can’t either; they don’t exist_________________________________(c) Presumably, then, a mental substance must be the cause.
![Page 58: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
The Mind is Not Me
It is clear that I produce some of my ideas, as in imagination. But most of my ideas are not produced by my own will; so they must be produced by the will of another.
![Page 59: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
The Mind is Wise and Benevolent
Sense ideas (a) are more strong, lively, and distinct than the ideas of imagination and (b) have a steadiness, order, and coherence lacking in the latter. Berkeley says these facts testify to the “wisdom and benevolence of [their] author”
![Page 60: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
RECEPTION
![Page 61: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
Samuel Johnson was a poet and essayist in Britain, one of the most important British literary figures, and a contemporary of Berkeley.
James Boswell, his biographer, conveys the following story in Life of Samuel Johnson.
![Page 62: Idealism](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56816666550346895dd9faf9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Samuel Johnson vs. Berkeley
“After we came out of the church, we stood talking for some time together of Bishop Berkeley's ingenious sophistry to prove the nonexistence of matter, and that every thing in the universe is merely ideal. I observed, that though we are satisfied his doctrine is not true, it is impossible to refute it. I never shall forget the alacrity with which Johnson answered, striking his foot with mighty force against a large stone, till he rebounded from it – “I refute it thus.””