Icm sem tech_master

34
Case study Linked-data for Linked-data for Integrated Catchment Integrated Catchment Management Management Ian Dickinson Epimorphics Ltd [email protected] @ephemerian Tom Guilbert Environment Agency tom.guilbert@ environment-agency.gov.uk

description

 

Transcript of Icm sem tech_master

Page 1: Icm sem tech_master

Case study

Linked-data forLinked-data forIntegrated Catchment Integrated Catchment

ManagementManagement

Ian DickinsonEpimorphics Ltd

[email protected]

@ephemerian

Tom GuilbertEnvironment Agency

[email protected]

Page 2: Icm sem tech_master

Agenda

context and aims– catchment management data– vision

integrated catchment linked-data project conclusion

Page 3: Icm sem tech_master

A better place for people and wildlife

Page 4: Icm sem tech_master

Catchment management

Page 5: Icm sem tech_master

Data overview

water bodiesrisk assessments

classification resultsreasons for failure

predicted outcomesactions

Page 6: Icm sem tech_master
Page 7: Icm sem tech_master

1. Data & evidence, consultations, local

knowledge, model outputs and plans collated in to a

shared central system “Local Community CPS”

Local Community Catchment Planning System

Local Community Catchment Planning System

MonitoringMonitoring Local Knowledge

Local Knowledge ActionsActions

2. Contents of Local Community CPS

published as Linked Data alongside EA

and research datasets

3. Linked Data (machine readable data) could be

automatically combined by applications such as the EVO, CCM Hub and any number of

web apps

CCMHUB

Slide used by kind permission of Michelle Walker, Rivers Trust

Page 8: Icm sem tech_master

ICM: proof-of-concept project

Page 9: Icm sem tech_master

ICM proof-of-concept project

16 weeks duration project team:

– 1 FTE app dev– 0.4 FTE user

research– 0.5 FTE data

7400 water bodies 7.8m triples

agile principles– four iterations– 2-3 week sprints– stakeholder

review

alpha/staging site

organizationscale

Page 10: Icm sem tech_master

From data to linked open data

data modelling

extraction

transformation

publication

presentation

interpretationdownload

source data

SQL

Java

Apache Fuseki

explorer application

Elda

Page 11: Icm sem tech_master

Modelling: considerations

every constant becomes a URI

plan for change

re-use vocabularies

complete is better than simple

Page 12: Icm sem tech_master

Data complexity

WaterBody

SurfaceWater GroundWater

RiverOrLake Transitional Coastal

River Lake

SurfaceWaterTransfer Canal SSSI_Ditch

Page 13: Icm sem tech_master

Data complexity

WaterBody

SurfaceWater GroundWater

RiverOrLake Transitional Coastal

River Lake

SurfaceWaterTransfer Canal SSSI_Ditch

Page 14: Icm sem tech_master

Data transformation

in: CSV out: RDF triples

iterative, so automate!

Page 15: Icm sem tech_master

Data publishing

Baseline goal:– provide access to the data

Practical considerations:– Just “follow-your-nose” linked data?– or SPARQL?– or an API?– ….

Page 16: Icm sem tech_master

Published data: SPARQL

?

Page 17: Icm sem tech_master

Published data: linked-data API

Page 18: Icm sem tech_master

Published data: linked-data API

Page 19: Icm sem tech_master

Published data: linked-data API

Page 20: Icm sem tech_master
Page 21: Icm sem tech_master

ICM data explorer

present the data in a meaningful way

provide meaningful and useful interactions

Page 22: Icm sem tech_master

Data explorer key features

search– by name, catchment, location, ...

show classification items filter by properties

– e.g. classification value map and tabular output basic reports download data

Page 23: Icm sem tech_master

Data explorer application

Specificunderstandingof user goalsand task

Genericdata-driven

interface

data explorer

Page 24: Icm sem tech_master

Data explorer application

Interpretationandreporting

Extractand

download

data explorer

Page 25: Icm sem tech_master

Data explorer application

Easy fornovicesto get started

Not toofrustrating

and slowfor experienced

users

data explorer

Page 26: Icm sem tech_master

Typical user enquiry

“Please show me all:– rivers and lakes – near Glastonbury – that had overall ecological classification as

moderate, poor or bad – between 2009 and 2012.”

Page 27: Icm sem tech_master

Dialogue moves

correspondingSPARQLquery

selectedRDF

resources

correspondingSPARQLquery

selectedRDF

resources

interactionstate

location,classifications,water-body types,...

interactionstate

add year constraint

Page 28: Icm sem tech_master
Page 29: Icm sem tech_master
Page 30: Icm sem tech_master

Demo

Page 31: Icm sem tech_master

Initial learnings

writing SPARQL by doing– in context– with feedback

hard to balance different user needs– explore vs. guide– real user input

download– important– RDF to useful CSV is hard

Page 32: Icm sem tech_master

Dissemination

Page 33: Icm sem tech_master

Conclusions & next steps

formal evaluation– involve partner organizations eg Rivers Trust

“generated excitement”– key engagement tool for catchment management

information– summer 2014 draft river basin management plans

big picture– reference spine for integrating data from other

environmental stakeholders

Page 34: Icm sem tech_master

Photo courtesy of grisleyreg http://www.panoramio.com/photo/65014213 License CC BY-NA 3.0

Questions?