ICEGOV - Tutorial 1 - Information Policy Concepts and Principles
description
Transcript of ICEGOV - Tutorial 1 - Information Policy Concepts and Principles
Information PolicyConcepts and Principles Concepts and Principles
Sharon DawesICEGOV 2009
.
Overview
• Information policy environment– Policies reflect their social & political settings
– Many stakeholders, actors, and roles
– Environments change, policies follow
• Two kinds of information policies and policy
roles for government:– Value-driven policies
– Instrumental policies
Policy types and governmental roles
Instrumental Information policies
Government as
information collector,
producer, provider
and user
Value-drivenInformation policies
Government as
regulator of information
flow in society
and user
Social and political concepts that underlie information policy choices
• Public speech and communication
• Diversity of information sources
• Individual choice and autonomy• Individual choice and autonomy
• Government openness
• Government regulation
• Role of private enterprise
Policy choices reflect social & political values
• Speech and communication: encouraged censored
• Diversity of sources: many few
• Individual choice & autonomy: protected restricted
• Government openness: transparent secret• Government openness: transparent secret
• Government regulation: light heavy
• Role of private enterprise: encouraged limited
High LowFree flow of information in society
Value-driveninformation policy themes
• Government transparency– Embodied in information access laws, records management and archival
requirements, public meetings and reporting laws
• Individual rights and autonomy• Individual rights and autonomy– Embodied in polices on free speech, privacy, and confidentiality
• Diversity of information sources– Embodied in treatment of the press and role of the private sector
regarding information sources and services
• Intellectual property– Embodied in copyright, patent, and trade provisions
Value-driven information policies as balancing mechanisms
To balance conflicts among three information values:
Access
To balance an information value against another policy concern:
Ownership Privacy
Other policy
Info value
Type I conflictHow best to implement, operationalize, or set the boundaries of an agreed upon information policy goal:goal:
Example: Is personal privacy best protected by government regulation or self-regulation by industry?
Type II conflict
An information value in
conflict with another social,
political, or economic goal
How to balance personal privacy
against the need for domestic
security following 9/11?
Type III conflict
An information value in
conflict with another
information right or value
Does web-based peer-to-peer
music sharing constitute a
form of access or a violation
of the ownership rights of
music producers?
Instrumental information policies
Government as
information collector,
Instrumental Information policies
Government as
regulator of information
flow in society
information collector,
producer, provider
and user
Value-drivenInformation policies
policies
Instrumental policies• Use information (or rules or policies about information) to
achieve some other policy goal– e.g. environmental quality, social equity, market fairness
• Used to influence individual or organizational choices and behaviorsand behaviors– e.g. requiring chemical manufacturers to publicly report toxic
by-products encourages improved processes that reduce pollution
• Used to create and manage information resources as a public good.– e.g. data collected and published about demographics or the
economy
Instrumental policy principles
StewardshipUsefulness
Information Stewardship Principle
• A conservative principle that addresses:
– treatment of government information as a fiduciary
responsibility of all agencies
– data collection decisions and methods– data collection decisions and methods
– data definition, quality, and integrity
– information architecture, standards, and frameworks
– information and system security
– confidentiality protections
– records management
Information Use Principle
• An expansive principle that addresses:
– government information as an asset of society
– information sharing within government & with others
– information-handling skills of public employees– information-handling skills of public employees
– information and technology as agents of change in
• programs
• services
• the relationship between government and citizens
Principles of information use within government
StewardshipUsefulness
Summary
• Value-driven policies– Information as the object of policy
– Government as regulator of societal information flow
– Conflicts among values are inevitable
• Instrumental policies– Information as a means to achieve some other policy goal
– Government as information collector, user, disseminator
– Stewardship and usefulness principles are equally
important
Information policy creation, change and development mechanisms in
Global contextEvgeny Styrin Ph.D.Visiting scholar
18
Visiting scholarCenter for Technology in Government, SUNY AlbanyICEGOV 2009Bogota, Columbia
April 22, 2010
Why information policy? – Establish and implement certain principles in working with
information• Equal rights to access information• Price of information obtained • Danger and damage prevention caused by information• Privacy and security of information• Intellectual property
19
• Intellectual property• Quantity and quality of information in Governance• Cultural identity preservation• Overcoming the digital divide• Processing information (creation, update, deletion)• Responsibility for information ownership and use• Requirements and standards of work with information
Information policy
Political parties
Business communities and
unions
Regional and local
governments
20
Information policy
Bureaucracy
Legislative authorities
Citizens
Experts, researches, scientists
Key players and their interests in information policy
• International Organizations (WTO, UNDP, WB, IMF, OECD) –recommendations, standards, principles
• Intergovernmental Unions (EU, UNASUR,CAN, CIS)• National States
•Political parties•Business communities and
21
Information Policyinfluence
•Business communities and unions •Bureaucracy•Legislative authorities•Citizens•Experts, researches, scientists•Regional and local governments
Okinawa Charter on Global Information Society –2000 (G8) Digital Opportunity Task Force (DOT
Force)– Seizing Digital Opportunities– Bridging the Digital Divide– Promoting Global Participation– Building Human Capacity– Promoting E-Commerce (Legal Framework)UNDP Global Summit (2 stages, Geneva 2003, UNDP Global Summit (2 stages, Geneva 2003,
Tunisia 2005)- 175 countries– Information Society Development Principles Declaration
(Geneva 2003)– Action Plan (Geneva 2003)– Tunisia Commitment– Tunisia Information Society Program
Geneva Action Plan 2003• E-government• E-Business• E-Health• E-Employment
• Cultural diversity• Ethics• International
Collaboration
23
• E-Employment• E-Education• E-Ecology• E-Agriculture• E-Science
Collaboration• Mass Media• Evaluation of E-
development
Tunisia Information Society Commitment and Program 2005
• Confirm Geneva Action Plan 2003• Develop financial mechanisms of Digital Divide
overcoming• Internet usage regulation• All kinds of partnerships in ICT projects
24
• All kinds of partnerships in ICT projects• Freedom of information search, usage, receipt especially
for knowledge creation• Integration opportunities• Cybercrime protection steps • Building trust and human potential• ICT infrastructure• IT-strategies development in every country (not later
than end of 2010) – POVERTY REDUCTION!
Basic mechanisms of Governance related to information policy
• Decision making
• Conflict resolution
• Change implementation
25
• Change implementation
• Experience transfer
Decision making
• What information do we need?
• Why do we need it?
• Does it let us make better decisions?
• How do we use the information?
26
• How do we use the information?
• Do we obtain better results? (communities and their demands, land, property, population registers, territory and ecology, health records history, educational resources, cultural heritage)
Conflict resolution and controversy in goals
• Privacy vs. Accountability and Transparency
• Right to access information vs. National Secret
• “Pay for information” vs. “Get it for free”
27
• E-document vs. Paper document
• Controversy among information policy documents on different governance levels and different sectors and branches of state activity
Information policy change or evolution factors
• Sign or adopt new international standards and agreements (UNCITRAL)
• Enter new political unions, blocks and organizations (EU membership)
28
organizations (EU membership)• Implementing changes in National Strategy• Lobbyism (different sources) and Interest
Groups • Legal framework (new definitions, rules)
Producing information policy change
Formal and informal rulesLegal Framework
29
Political Institutions
How to improve information policy for the agency – Administrator’s Guide (Balance
Between Risk and Trust)
External environment identification
Conflict resolution
Decision making
Evaluation
30
Identify external environment demands, changesFormulate problems Identify, choose and study appropriate experience Identify external and internal stakeholders
Build trust, support and feedback within your stakeholders network (social media for professionals, knowledge sharing, discussion platforms)Find out conflicts, controversies (legal context, political environment, informal rules)Make your goals more clearIdentify the desirable outcomesAssess readiness and resources for the changes and policy implementationIdentify and manage risks of possible changes in information policy
Establish or join agreements, frameworks, standards, glossariesDevelop info policy document as a tool for your goals achievement (build guidelines, apply for laws modification, give detailed instructions, avoid ambiguity and high level of abstraction)Use public expertise (involve NGO’s, experts, other relevant stakeholders)Identify mechanism of new info policy enactment (awareness, understanding, control)Staff training
Evaluate effectiveness Get stakeholders’ feedback
Information Policy Organizational Infrastructure (Governance Culture
2 opposite points)• Carrots vs. Sticks?• Recommendations, informality and autonomy
vs. Orders, legislative formalization and penalties
31
penalties• Leadership vs. Participation• Transparency in problem solving vs. Back
stage activity• Frequent vs. Rare activities in success
evaluation, strategy adjustment, new issues discussion
Information policyEstablishing principal agreement
– All elements of agreement between the levels of government including the purpose, roles and responsibilities, terms and conditions
– Description of the parties, governance structure, commercial arrangements,
– Legislation authorizing the proposal and legislative/policy requirementsrequirements
– Information to be exchanged &/or integrated services to be provided, limitations on access, use and disclosure of information, confidentiality requirements, information protection and management, disposal of information, audit requirements
– Dispute resolution processes and sometimes liability/responsibility clauses in various circumstances for failure to abide by terms and conditions or for negligence or privacy breach
32
Experience transfer in information policy adoption
• ICT development goes with different pace• Many countries face the same problems• There exist a number of solutions based on
different cultural and traditional legacy, political regime, strategic goals, structure of economy and
33
regime, strategic goals, structure of economy and society
• Benchmark solutions and pick up those based on similar reality to yours
• Adopt solutions according to country’s peculiarities or develop new solutions
Small group discussions
• Identify problems and approaches in your
government to share with all tutorial participants
• Themes
– Legal framework– Legal framework
– Institutional change
– Strategies/mechanisms for policy making
– Government transparency
– Citizen’s information rights