ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

14
ICEBreaker Option S-function Verification Tool Sept 2010 - Using your VNA at its full power -

Transcript of ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

Page 1: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

ICEBreaker

Option S-function Verification Tool

Sept 2010

- Using your VNA at its full power -

Page 2: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 2

Outline

● From S-parameters to S-functions● Potential Pitfalls● Confidence in S-functions through verification● ICEBreaker – Option S-function Verification Tool

● Measured datasets

● Datasets, predicted by S-functions

● Comparison tools

● Conclusion

Page 3: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 3

From S-parameters to S-functions

S-parametersS-parameters

S-functionsS-functions

Linear Applications

“NonLinear” Applications

AllOther

NonLinearApplications

?

? ?

Page 4: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 4

The Potential Pitfalls

Bi j =Sf ijx1a1 f 0 , a2 f 0 , vdcSf ijkl a1 f 0 , a2 f 0 , vdc Ak l f 0

Sfcijkl a1 f 0 , a2 f 0 , vdc Ak* l f 0

● Constantness of LSOP

● Interpolation Capability

● Linearity Assumption

ICEBreakerOption S-function Verification Tool

Large-Signal Operating Point“Tickle tones”

Page 5: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 5

Confidence in S-functions through Verification

Page 6: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 6

Pitfall 1: Constantness of LSOPPart of S-function Visualization

Select LSOP variable

Filter for a LSOP variableand value

Variation on fixed input power

Variation ondrain bias voltage

Page 7: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 7

Pitfall 2: Interpolation CapabilityPart of S-function Extraction Visualization

amplitude of complex error for measured and predicted b2

zoom inon result

Number of measurements

zoom inontickling

Page 8: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 8

Pitfall 3: Linearity AssumptionDC

k f0

f0

f0

or

ZL

Large-SignalSource

TicklingSource

Bias

DC Bias

Large-Signal

Small-Signalfor harmonics

Switching Amplifier design

DC Bias a2k f 0

Lk f 0 L2 f 0 L3 f 0

a22 f 0 Still small signal?a23 f 0

Page 9: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 9

ICEBreaker – Option S-function Verification Tool

ICEBreakerDataset

● Measured Data

● Realistic Sweep Plan

● Under multi-harmonic Load-Pull

PredictedICEBreakerDataset

CompareDatasets

● Using S-function ● Derived Quantities

● Incident / Reflected Waves

● Voltage and Current

● Absolute Error

● Relative Error

Page 10: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 10

Generation of “S-function Predicted Dataset” in ICEBreaker

GenerateS-function basedDataset

CompareDatasetandS-function basedDataset

Page 11: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 11

Absolute Comparisons with S-function Predictions

Quantity forwhich to comparemeasurement andprediction

MeasurementsS-functionPrediction

Absolute Error

● Derived quantities➢ Idc_out➢ Gain➢ Pdel_in➢ Pdel_out➢ PAE➢ ..

● Basic quantities➢ Incident waves➢ Reflected waves➢ Voltages / Currents

● Style➢ Points➢ Contours➢ Points & Contours

Idc_out

Page 12: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 12

Relative Comparisons with S-function Predictions

b_out(3f0)

● Versus➢ Harmonic index➢ Harmonic refl

● Desired● Realized

Relative Error (dB)

Page 13: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 13

Conclusion

For more information [email protected]

www.nmdg.be

Using the complex multi-harmonic sweep plans of ICEBreaker it is easy to verify the S-functions under a

series of realistic conditions

- Use your VNA at its full power -

Page 14: ICEBreaker Option: S- functions Verification

© NMDG 2010 14

Want to try?Contact us

[email protected]