ICC Banking Commission London Technical Meeting - Overall Powerpoint
ICC Banking Commission London Technical Meeting - Regulations
-
Upload
international-chamber-of-commerce-icc -
Category
Presentations & Public Speaking
-
view
107 -
download
2
Transcript of ICC Banking Commission London Technical Meeting - Regulations
Date: November 2017 INTERNAL - EXTERNAL
Regulations: What is changing? How does this impact Global Trade?
2
What Is Happening With Credit Risk – Likely Final Rules
INTERNAL - External
Asset Class
Existing Approach
Proposed Approach
Likely Final Rules
Banks + FI
Internal Ratings Based
Approach (IRBA)
Standardised
IRBF
Corporate Assets > Eur 50 bln
IRBA, IRBF, Standardised
Standardised
Asset Threshold Increased to
Eur100bln IRBF
Corporate Assets ≤ Eur 50 bln
Revenues > Eur 200 mln
IRBA, IRBF, Standardised
IRBF
Revenue Threshold Increased
to Eur ? Remains on IRBF
Corporate Assets ≤ Eur 50 bln
Revenues < Eur 200 mln
IRBA, IRBF, Standardised
IRBA
Revenue Threshold Increased
to Eur ? Remains on IRBA
Commodity Lending
IRBA, IRBF, Slotting, Standardised
Slotting, Standardised IRBA, IRBF Pending Finalisation of
Granular Slotting Approach
* Source: Basel Committee Publications Based on IIF/AFME Proposals
3
What Is Happening With Credit Risk – Likely Final Rules
INTERNAL - External
Risk Parameter
Existing Treatment
Proposed Treatment
Likely Final Rules
Probability of default
(PD)
3bps
5bps
5bps
Loss-given-default (LGD) Unsecured
No Floor
25%
25%
Loss-given-default
(LGD) Secured
Collateral Financial : 0%
Receivables : 35% Commercial Real
Estate (CRE) : 35%
Collateral Financial : 0%
Receivables : 15% CRE : 15%
Other Physical: 20%
Collateral Financial : 0%
Receivables : 15% CRE : 15%
Other Physical: 20%
Loss-Given Default (LGD) • Floors applicable only to IRBA
• Increase in haircuts for non-financial collateral
• Decrease in LGDs for non-financial collateral
• Removal of required minimum collateral
4
What Is Happening With Credit Risk – Likely Final Rules
INTERNAL - External
Risk Parameter
Existing Treatment
Proposed Treatment
Likely Final Rules
Exposed-At-Default (EAD) :
Credit Conversion Factor (CCF)
IRBF : 20 / 50 / 100%
IRBA : Modelled values
IRBF : No Change
IRBA : Floored at 50% Using STD Approach CCF
Removal of 0% CCF
IRBF: ? IRBA: ?
Maturity (M)
IRBF : 2.5 years
(National Discretion to Waive)
IRBF : No Change
IRBF: No Change (National Discretion to wave)
Maturity (M)
IRBA : Based on Transaction tenor + cashflows. Subject to
a cap 5 years
IRBA : Based on facility review date
Residual Maturity?
5
What is Happening with the Standardised Approach
INTERNAL - External
External rating of counterparty AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to B- Below B-
Base Risk Weight 20% 50% 50% 100% 150%
Risk Weight for short term exposure 20% 20% 20% 50% 150%
Bank Exposures External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA)
Standardised Credit Risk Assessment Approach (SCRA) Credit Risk Assessment of
counterparty Grade A Grade B Grade C
Base Risk Weight 50% 100% 150%
Risk Weight for short term exposure 20% 50% 150%
Base Risk Weight Multilateral Development Bank’s (MDB) External rating of
counterparty AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to BB- Below BB- Unrated
Base Risk Weight 20% 50% 50% 100% 150% 50%
6
What is Happening with the Standardised Approach
INTERNAL - External
External rating of counterparty AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to BB- Below BB- Unrated*
Base Risk Weight 20% 50% 100% 100% 150% 100%
Corporate Exposures External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA)
Specialised lending
Risk Weight
Commodities Finance 120%
Project Finance (Pre-operational phase) 150%
Project Finance (Operational phase) 100%
Land acquisition / Development 150%
Loan to Value Ratio (LTV)
Commercial Real Estate Finance
LTV ≤ 60% 60% < LTV ≤ 80% LTV > 80%
80% 100% 130%
• In jurisdictions where there are no external ratings, base risk weight is 100% • Small + Medium Enterprises (SME): 85% Risk Weight (Turnover less than 50mln)
7
Capital Floor
INTERNAL - External
• Ensure level of capital across the banking system does not fall below a certain level
• Mitigate model risk and measurement error stemming from internally modelled approaches
• Enhance comparability of capital outcomes across banks
Key questions to be addressed
• Is the floor applied to each major risk category - credit , market and operational risk • Alternatively is it a floor based on aggregate RWA’s
• Risk category based floors do not allow offsetting across risk types: Market, Credit, Operational
• What level will the capital floor be set at ?