IBM eServer pSeries Presentation subtitle: 20pt Arial Regular, teal R045 | G182 | B179 Recommended...
-
Upload
alexis-coleen-rice -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of IBM eServer pSeries Presentation subtitle: 20pt Arial Regular, teal R045 | G182 | B179 Recommended...
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2005 IBM Corporation
WAKE UP TO THE POWER!IBM ^ p5 systems
2
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
Jaw-dropping performanceIBM p5 520, 550, 570, 590, 595
Plus breakthrough virtualizationinnovations that will help you
You’ll never look at computing the same way again
Lower costs
Improve flexibility
Improve manageability
Safeguard data
and be prepared for what tomorrow brings through a more simplified infrastructure
3
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I2-way1.65 GHz POWER5™
p5-520 Up to 4-way1.65 GHz POWER5
p5-550p5-570*
p5-590
p5-595
p5-520 Express
Up to 2-way1.5 GHz POWER5
p5-550 Express
Up to 4-way1.5 GHz POWER5
p5-570* Express
Up to 8-way1.5 GHz POWER5
Up to 16-way1.65 GHz POWER5
1.9 GHz POWER5
*’Pay as you grow’ modular architecture
The IBM ~ p5 family of systemsJaw-dropping performance, plus the power to put it to work
Up to 64-way1.65 GHz POWER5
1.9 GHz POWER5
Up to 32-way1.65 GHz POWER5
Advanced POWER Virtualization available on these systems
Advanced POWER Virtualizationstandard on these systems
4
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
Gartner Group Magic Quadrant 2004 Enterprise Servers
‘IBM continues to execute well on its pSeries strategy, maintaining the top position in this year's update. pSeries execution has been strong throughout
2004, and offers high-end levels of performance that few other server
vendors can match. This assessment is also based on thePower4+ technology, so
with the new Power5-based servers getting ready to ship in volume, their opportunities for quadrant leadership
should remain strong’
Source: Gartner Group: Magic Quadrant Enterprise Servers, October 2004
5
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
IBM ^ pSeries: the emerging UNIX leaderWorldwide Trends forecast by Gartner*
Only three server OSs predicted to grow share—Microsoft® Windows®, Linux and AIX®
Only three server microprocessor architectures predicted to grow share—IA-32, IPF and POWER
AIX will approach or overtake Solaris as the #1 UNIX operating system
*CIO Update: The March of Linux in the Enterprise. Gartner ResearchMarch 10, 2004
6
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
AIX 5L for UNIX professionals
AIX 5L for UNIX professionals
Sun SPARC
HP
IBMPOWER4 POWER5 POWER6™*
New, innovative technology should not be disruptive
*All statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals and objectives only.
Fujitsu [APL]**
UltraSPARC
Opteron™***
PA-RISC
Alpha
VAX
Itanium®****
**http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2004-06/sunflash.20040601.14.html***http://www.sun.com/amd/****http://h71033.www7.hp.com/page/ItaniumAnnment.html
7
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Servers
Workstations
PCs
Gaming Consoles
Embedded
PowerPC®
PowerPC
PowerPC
PowerPC
IBM POWER – the proven architecture More than 18 million POWER chips shipped 2002 Leading Performance and Virtualization Superior scalability 2 to 64 way
10
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
p5-595 beats HP and Sun on SAP SD 2-tier
4-wp5-570
Users
Source: www.sap.com/benchmark/All results as of: 10/15/04
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
8-wp5-570
16-wp5-570
16-wrx8620
72-wE25K*
72-wF15K
36-wE20K*
104-wF15K
7000
8000
900010,000
64-wp5-595
IBM
SunHP
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
15,000
16,000
17,000
18,000
19,000
20,000
Near Linear S
calabilit
y
*Two processor cores per n-way
p5 provides excellent scalability from 4- to 64-way
The 64-way p5-595 can handle almost twice the number of users as the Sun E25K; using less than half the number of processor cores
p5-595 system is first to break the 100,000 SAPS threshold
*Two processor cores per n-way
#1
#1
#1
#1
SA
P
Use
rs
11
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
TPC-C Top 10 Leadership
Rank Company System tpmC Price / tpmCSystem
availabilityDatabase Operating
systemDate
submitted
1 IBM P5-595 (64-way)POWER5 1.9 GHz
3,210,540 $5.15 05/14/05 IBM DB2 8.2 IBM AIX 5l V5.3 11/18/04
2 IBM p690 (32-way)POWER4+ 1.9 GHz 1,025,486 $5.43 08/16/04 IBM DB2 8.1 IBM AIX 5l V5.2 02/17/04
3 HPHP Integrity
Superdome (64-way)Itanium 1.5 GHz
1,008,144 $8.33 04/14/04 Oracle 10G HP UX 11iv2 11/04/03
4 IBM p5-570 (16-way)POWER5 1.9 GHz 809,144 $4. 95 09/30/04 IBM DB2 8.2 IBM AIX 5L V5.3 07/13/04
5 HPHP Integrity
Superdome (64-way)Itanium 1.5 GHz
786,646 $6.49 10/23/03 Microsoft SQL Server 2003
Microsoft Windows Server 08/27/03
6 IBM p690 (32-way)POWER4+ 1.7 GHz 768,839 $8.55 02/29/04 Oracle 10G IBM AIX 5L V5.2 09/12/03
7 IBM p690 (32-way)POWER4+ 1.7 GHz 763,898 $8.25 11/08/03 IBM DB2 8.1 IBM AIX 5L V5.2 06/30/03
8 HPHP Integrity
Superdome (64-way)Itanium 1.5 GHz
707,102 $7.16 10/23/03 Microsoft SQL Server 2003
Microsoft Windows Server 05/20/03
9 NECNEC Express 5800
(32-way)Itanium 1.5 GHz
683,575 $5.99 10/05/04 Oracle 10G SLES 9 06/28/04
10 IBM p690 (32-way)POWER4+ 1.7 GHz 680,613 $11.13 11/08/03 IBM DB2 8.1 IBM AIX 5l V5.2 05/09/03
Source: www.tpc.org 11/30/04
"Over the last year or so, IBM and HP have dueling it out with tit-for-tat, 'So take this!' - 'No! Back atcha!' releases," said Jonathan Eunice at
Illuminata. "But these have been entirely incremental - 1 percent or 2 percent kind of
things. I think IBM just decided to go nuclear. You can just see them thinking, 'Screw 3
percent! Let's do 200 percent!'"
12
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
1,025,486 1,008,114
809,144 786,646 768,839
$8.33
$4.95
$6.49
$8.55
$5.43
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
$0
$20
Transaction Performance - TPC-C V5 Non-Clustered
Avail. date: 08/16/04 04/14/04 09/30/04 10/23/03 02/29/04Result date: 02/17/04 11/04/03 07/13/04 08/27/03 09/12/03
IBMp690
32-wayDB2
tpmC
$/tpmC
AnySun
Result
tpmC
HP Superdome
64-wayOracle
Source: www.tpc.org All results are as of 07/13/04.
IBMp690
32-wayOracle
HP Superdome
64-waySQL Server
IBMp5-57016-way
DB2
Only one competitive result is higher than the 16-way
p5-570!
13
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
TPC-C 16-way TPC-C 8-way
IBM POWER5 Best of Breed Per CPU (non-IBM) Best Per-CPU Itanium
Best HP Itanium HP PA-RISC Sun UltraSPARC
POWER5 – More TPC Performance per Processor
Performance per Processor (normalized to POWER5)
16-way IBM p5-570 TPC-C result of 809,144 tpmC, $4.95/tpmC, avail. 09/30/0416-way Unisys ES7000 TPC-C result of 309,037 tpmC, $4.49/tpmC, avail. 01/30/0416-way HP rx8620 TPC-C result of 301,225 tpmC, $4.56/tpmC, avail. 04/15/048-way IBM p5-570 TPC-C result of 371,044 tpmC, $5.26/tpmC, avail. 09/30/048-way Bull NovaScale 5080 result of 175,366 tpmC, $4.53/tpmC, avail. 06/30/04 Source: www.tpc.org All results are as of 07/13/04
14
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Best SAP SD 2-tier Result SAP SD 2-Tier 16-way SAP SD 2-Tier 8-way SAP SD 2-Tier 4-way
IBM HP Itanium HP PA-RISC Sun UltraSPARC
POWER5 – More SAP Performance per Processor
Performance per Processor (normalized to POWER5)
Source: www.sap.com/benchmark/All results are as of 07/13/04
“Processor” is defined as a “core” according to SPEC definitions.
Benchmarksp5-570 Result
HPItanium Result
HP Itanium System
HPPA-RISC
Result
HP PA-RISC System Sun Result Sun System
SAP SD 2-tier Best 5,056 2880 HP rx8620 1,240 HP rp4440 5,775 Sun Fire 15000
SAP SD 2-tier 16-way 5,056 2880 HP rx8620 DNP DNP
SAP SD 2-tier 8-way 2,600 1500 HP rx7620 1,240 HP rp4440 600 V880
SAP SD 2-tier 4-way 1,313 880 HP rx4640 DNP 320 Sun Fire E4900
15
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
TPC SAP SPECjbb2000 SPEC OMPM2001(peak)
Linpack HPC
IBM HP Itanium HP PA-RISC Sun UltraSPARC
POWER5 – More Performance per Processor
Performance per Processor (normalized to POWER5)
Source:www.spec.orgwww.tpc.orgwww.sap.com/benchmark/http://performance.netlib.org/performance/ht ml/PDSreports.html
All results are as of 07/13/04IBM SPEC results submitted to SPEC as of 7/13/04.
“Processor” is defined as a “core” according to SPEC definitions.SPEC OMP results must be listed as “estimated” until approved by SPEC.
16-way IBM p5-570 TPC-C result of 809,144 tpmC, $4.95/tpmC, avail. 09/30/0464-way HP Superdome (Itanium) TPC-C result of 1,008,144 tpmC, $8.33/tpmC, avail. 4/14/0464-way HP Superdome (PA-RISC) result of 541,673 tpmC, $11.66/tpmC, avail. 01/30/04
Benchmark Results per processorp5-570 Result
HPItanium Result
HP Itanium System
HPPA-RISC
Result
HP PA-RISC System Sun Result Sun System
SAP SD 2-tier Best 328 180 HP rx8620 155 HP rp4440 80 Sun Fire 15000
SPECjbb2000 Best 42,532 17,966 HP S’Dome 17,952 HP rp8420 9,630 Sun Fire 6800
SPEC OMPM2001peak Best 3,403 1,721 HP rx8620 549 HP S’Dome 27 Sun Fire 6800
Linpack Best 6.88 5.745 HP rx5670 DNP DNP
16
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
0 1 2 3 4 5
SPEC OMPM2001 / CPU
SPECjbb2000/CPU
SPECfp_rate2000 16-way
SPECint_rate2000 16-way
SPECfp_rate2000 8-way
SPECint_rate2000 8-way
SPECfp_rate2000 4-way
SPECint_rate2000 4-way
SPECfp2000
SAP SD 2-tier 4-way
SAP SD 2-tier 8-way
SAP SD 2-tier/CPU
Fastest Sun
IBM
POWER5 vs. Sun
Relative Performance
72-”core” E20K
See next page for data used in this graph.
Source:www.spec.orgwww.tpc.orgwww.sap.com/benchmark/http://performance.netlib.org/performance/ht ml/PDSreports.html
All results are as of 07/13/04IBM SPEC results submitted to SPEC as of 7/13/04.
SPEC OMP results must be listed as “estimated” until approved by SPEC.
16-way p5-570
12-way Sun Fire 4800
8-way p5-570
24-way Sun Fire 6800
16-way p5-570
17
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
POWER5 vs. Sun UltraSPARC IV
Source: http://www.sap.com/benchmark/Processor defined according to the SPEC definition of “core”.If you use the Sun definition of processor, then IBM used 8 “processors” to beat Sun’s 36 “processors.”
# Users # Users per Processor
5,056 5,050
70.14
316.00
0
5,000
10,000
0
100
200
300
400
SunE20K
UltraSPARC IV72-wayOracle
IBMp5-570
POWER516-way
DB2
Running SAP SD 2-tier, the IBM p5 570
with 16 processorsbeat
the Sun E20Kwith 72 processors.
POWER5 Math: 16 > 72
Sun just does not add up!
# Users# Users per Processor
All results are as of 07/13/04.
18
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
TPC SAP SPECjbb2000 SPEC OMPM2001(peak)
Linpack HPC
IBM HP Itanium HP PA-RISC Sun UltraSPARC
POWER5 – More Performance per Processor
Performance per Processor (normalized to POWER5)
Source:www.spec.orgwww.tpc.orgwww.sap.com/benchmark/http://performance.netlib.org/performance/ht ml/PDSreports.html
All results are as of 07/13/04IBM SPEC results submitted to SPEC as of 7/13/04.
“Processor” is defined as a “core” according to SPEC definitions.SPEC OMP results must be listed as “estimated” until approved by SPEC.
16-way IBM p5-570 TPC-C result of 809,144 tpmC, $4.95/tpmC, avail. 09/30/0464-way HP Superdome (Itanium) TPC-C result of 1,008,144 tpmC, $8.33/tpmC, avail. 4/14/0464-way HP Superdome (PA-RISC) result of 541,673 tpmC, $11.66/tpmC, avail. 01/30/04
Benchmark Results per processorp5-570 Result
HPItanium Result
HP Itanium System
HPPA-RISC
Result
HP PA-RISC System Sun Result Sun System
SAP SD 2-tier Best 328 180 HP rx8620 155 HP rp4440 80 Sun Fire 15000
SPECjbb2000 Best 42,532 17,966 HP S’Dome 17,952 HP rp8420 9,630 Sun Fire 6800
SPEC OMPM2001peak Best 3,403 1,721 HP rx8620 549 HP S’Dome 27 Sun Fire 6800
Linpack Best 6.88 5.745 HP rx5670 DNP DNP
19
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Porque é bom ter mais performance com menos CPUs?
# Processors 18 24 28 30 32 56 64 72 112
Oracle9i Perpetual License
720,000 960,000 1,120,000 1,200,000 1,280,000 2,240,000 2,560,000 2,880,000 4,480,000
Annual Updates
108,000 144,000 168,000 180,000 192,000 336,000 384,000 432,000 672,000
Annual Prd support
50,400 67,200 78,400 84,000 89,600 156,800 179,200 201,600 313,600
3-year total 1,195,200 1,593,600 1,859,200 1,992,000 2,124,800 3,718,400 4,249,600 4,780,800 7,436,800
Volume Discount
20.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00% 25.00%
DB Total 956,200 1,195,200 1,394,400 1,494,000 1,593,600 2,788,800 3,187,200 3,585,600 5,577,600
All prices US$ from the Oracle Store Website
20
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
IBM
eServer
p5 520
Express -
2 x 1.5
GHz
IBM
eServer
p5 520
Express -
2 x 1.5
GHz
(24x7)
IBM
eServer
p5 520 - 2
x 1.65
GHz
IBM
eServer
p5 520 - 2
x 1.65
GHz
(24x7)
IBM
eServer
p5 550
Express -
4 x 1.5
GHz
IBM
eServer
p5 550
Express -
4 x 1.5
GHz
(24x7)
Sun Fire
V40z - 4 x
2.2 GHz
Sun Fire
V40z - 4 x
2.2 GHz
(24x7)
Sun Fire
V490 - 4 x
1.05 GHz
Sun Fire
V490 - 4 x
1.05 GHz
(24x7)
US
D
SW Year 2&3
HW Year 2&3
SW Year 1
HW Year 1
SW Purchase
HW Purchase
3-year Costs Of AcquisitionIBM eServer p5 (2 and 4-way) vs. Sun Fire (4-way)
Comparison criteria: Equivalent
performance
Comparison criteria: Equivalent
performance
According to a majority of industry benchmarks it’s reasonable to assume that every time we need one POWER5 processor to meet a designated performance requirement, Sun will need 2 processors
NB! A Sun US-IV processor chip includes 2 processor cores
According to a majority of industry benchmarks it’s reasonable to assume that every time we need one POWER5 processor to meet a designated performance requirement, Sun will need 2 processors
NB! A Sun US-IV processor chip includes 2 processor cores
Left column: SLA = Same day
Right column: SLA = 24x7
Left column: SLA = Same day
Right column: SLA = 24x7
The p5 550 will outperform any 4-
way Sun Fire system by a substantial
margin
Source: IDEAS International, November 2004
21
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
IBM eServer p5 570Express - 8 x 1.5 GHz
(24x7)
IBM eServer p5 570 -8 x 1.65 GHz (24x7)
Sun Fire E6900 - 20 x1.2 GHz (24x7)
US
D
SW Year 2&3
HW Year 2&3
SW Year 1
HW Year 1
SW Purchase
HW Purchase
3-year Costs Of AcquisitionIBM eServer p5 570 vs. Sun Fire E6900
Comparison criteria: Equivalent
performance
Comparison criteria: Equivalent
performance
Sun needs a system that costs 3.5 times more (in list
prices) to match an 8-way p5 570
Sun needs a system that costs 3.5 times more (in list
prices) to match an 8-way p5 570
Source: IBM and IDEAS International, November 2004
22
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
IBM eServer p5570 - 16 x 1.9 GHz
(24x7)
IBM eServer p5595 - 16 x 1.65
GHz (24x7)
Sun Fire E20K -36 x 1.2 GHz
(24x7)
Sun Fire E25K -56 x 1.2 GHz
(24x7)
US
D
SW Year 2&3
HW Year 2&3
SW Year 1
HW Year 1
SW Purchase
HW Purchase
3-year Costs Of AcquisitionIBM eServer p5 570 and p5 595 vs. Sun Fire E20K
Source: IDEAS International, November 2004
Comparison criteria: Equivalent
performance
Comparison criteria: Equivalent
performance
SAP SD 2-tier results published on http://www.sap.com/benchmark have proven that a 16-way p5 570 matches a 36-way (72 cores) Sun Fire E20K
SAP SD 2-tier results published on http://www.sap.com/benchmark have proven that a 16-way p5 570 matches a 36-way (72 cores) Sun Fire E20K
23
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
“Enterprises should change their thinking about consolidation and pursue a server virtualization strategy rather than a server consolidation project.
Server virtualization technologies pool and connect server resources in a way that masks the physical nature and boundaries of those resources from resource users. “
— T. Bittman, Gartner Research Note, SP-21-5502 14 November 2003.
IBM virtualization technologies are designed to provide more business value than server consolidation alone
24
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
IBM's Logical and HP/Sun's Physical
Processors
Memory
PCI adapters
IBM : Logical partitioning HP: Physical block partitioning
Architecture:High performanceLogical partitioning Continuous reallocation of resources
Architecture:Large CPU configurationsPhysical partitioning Removal and replacement of defective boards
Contention point if you do logical paritioning with acell board architecture
25
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Sys1
Sys2
Sys3
Application A
Application B
Application C
more to manage
more costs
more headaches
Many organizations today run a single application onone or more serversBuying more processing power than needed and getting . . .
26
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Sys1
Sys2
Sys3
PhysicalBut this only addresses floor space
And does not enable you to respond to changing requirements of an on demand business
Application A
Application B
Application C
Some vendors offer physical partitioning…
27
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Logical
Sys1
Sys2
Sys3
Physical
Application A
Application B
Application C
In 2001: Logical Partitioning enabled consolidation of multiple application workloads
In 2002: Dynamic Logical Partitioning, enabled dynamic reassignment of workloads
Dynamic
IBM partitioning innovations are designed to go farther
28
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Micro
Application A
Application B
Application C
IBM gives you more power with Micro-Partitioning Designed so you can manage more work with a single system than ever before and do it . . .
automatically
for less
and, with fewer headaches
29
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Server Consolidation
Application A OLTP
Application B (Lower Priority)
Application C (Lower Priority)
— simplify your environment
— rapidly respond to changing needs
— drive higher system utilization
Server 1
Server 2
Server 3
Server 4
Server 5
Server 6
Server 7
Server 8
Server 9
Server 10
Server 11
Server 12
And, Micro-Partitioning enables even more flexibility Designed to support both server consolidation and a mixed workload
Mixed Workload
30
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Micro
Logical
Including redundant I/O
IBM extends virtualization to shared resources Designed to enable the sharing of storage and communication adapters
LAN adapter
Storage adapter
— fewer resources to purchase, configure and maintain
— simple and quick adjustments as business demands change
31
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
CoD
CoD
Application A
Application B
Application C
Designed to automatically and dynamically engage inactive processors based on pre-defined business objectives — and increase system throughput
~ p5 takes Capacity on Demand* to the next levelAnnouncing Reserve Capacity on Demand and On/Off Capacity on Demand
*on select models
Capacity Upgrade on Demand
Trial Capacity on Demand
Also available . . .
32
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
RAS Strategies Reliability
Grade of Parts
Reduce the quantity of parts
Eliminate Heat
Packaging
AvailabilityRun time diagnostics
Recovery/Retry
System redundancies
De-allocation of resources
Isolation / Failure containment
ServiceabilityError logging / diagnostics
Concurrent repair
Reduce service errors and time
The p690 has a very good record on reliability. According to the vendor, meantime-between-failure rates for critical components
(processors, memory, backplane) for the p690 are 3x better than the original design target, and that was set at 5x higher than the
Unix industry average.
-Gartner, IBM eServer pSeries 690+: High-End Unix Server, 8/2003
33
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
Mainframe Class RAS for IBM’s Unix Mainframe
Diagnose Failures at RuntineFirst Failure Data Capture
Light Path Diagnostics
Service processor
Hardware memory scrubbing
On-line diagnostics
Fault AvoidanceALORS Database
Copper/SOI Chip Technology
Book packaging
MCM packaging
Reduced parts
Repeat Gard
Microcode discovery service
Blind swap adapters
BIST/POST
Deallocate ResourcesDynamic CPU deallocation
Memory deallocation
L2 & L3 cache deallocation
L3 cache line delete
PCI bus deallocation
Utilize System RedundanciesSpare L1 & L2 cache bits
Spare L2 & L3 directory bits
Spare memory chips
Mirrored L2 directory
Redundant I/O links to I/O drawers
Optional internal batteries
N+1 Fans
N+1 Power supplies/cords
Spare Hardware Management Console
Resolve Intermittent FaultsECC ChipkillTM memory
ECC for L2 & L3, Parity w/reload for L1
PCI bus recovery
Dynamic processor sparing
UE Gard (Uncorrectable Error)
Disk bad block relocation
Online Parts ReplacementHot plug fans
Hot swap PCI adapters
Hot swap disk drives
Hot plug power subsystem
Hot swap CD/CVD/Diskette/Media
AIX RAS FeaturesIntegrated JFS/LVM
Resource Monitoring & Control
Network interface backup
EtherChannel & IEEE 802.3ad
Multipath IP routing
Dead gateway detection
Virtual IP address
Dual path I/O
Dynamic AIX kernel
Configurable error log facility
Alternate rootvg
34
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
And you can only get this power from IBM*
IBM p5 HP Sun
Dynamic logical partitioning YES PA-RISC only No
Advanced virtualization technologies Micro-Partitioning YES No NoSCSI / Fibre Channel device sharing YES No NoCommunication adapter sharing YES No No
Cross-partition resource management YES No No
CoD options Trial, On/Off YES Yes YesReserve YES No No
‘Pay as you grow’ modular architecture YES No No
Run multiple different operating systemsYES Limited Noin logical partitioning
Single binary compatible architecture YES No No
* IBM Systems and Technology Group Marketing Intelligence, 2Q04
35
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
IBM ^ p5: Get the power!
Jaw-dropping performance
Unique IBM virtualization technologies
Competitive pricing
IBM service and support
Make No Compromises. Accept No Limitations.ibm.com/eserver/pseries
36
IBM eServer pSeries
© 2004 IBM Corporation
I
The following are trademarks of the International Business Machines Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. For a complete list of IBM Trademarks, see www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml: AS/400, DBE, e-business logo, ESCO, eServer, FICON, IBM, IBM Logo, iSeries, MVS, OS/390, pSeries, RS/6000, S/30, VM/ESA, VSE/ESA, Websphere, xSeries, z/OS, zSeries, z/VM
The following are trademarks or registered trademarks of other companies
Lotus, Notes, and Domino are trademarks or registered trademarks of Lotus Development CorporationJava and all Java-related trademarks and logos are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc., in the United States and other countriesLINUX is a registered trademark of Linux TorvaldsUNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries.Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.SET and Secure Electronic Transaction are trademarks owned by SET Secure Electronic Transaction LLC.Intel is a registered trademark of Intel Corporation* All other products may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
NOTES:
Performance is in Internal Throughput Rate (ITR) ratio based on measurements and projections using standard IBM benchmarks in a controlled environment. The actual throughput that any user will experience will vary depending upon considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration, and the workload processed. Therefore, no assurance can be given that an individual user will achieve throughput improvements equivalent to the performance ratios stated here.
IBM hardware products are manufactured from new parts, or new and serviceable used parts. Regardless, our warranty terms apply.
All customer examples cited or described in this presentation are presented as illustrations of the manner in which some customers have used IBM products and the results they may have achieved. Actual environmental costs and performance characteristics will vary depending on individual customer configurations and conditions.
This publication was produced in the United States. IBM may not offer the products, services or features discussed in this document in other countries, and the information may be subject to change without notice. Consult your local IBM business contact for information on the product or services available in your area.
All statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals and objectives only.
Information about non-IBM products is obtained from the manufacturers of those products or their published announcements. IBM has not tested those products and cannot confirm the performance, compatibility, or any other claims related to non-IBM products. Questions on the capabilities of non-IBM products should be addressed to the suppliers of those products.
Prices subject to change without notice. Contact your IBM representative or Business Partner for the most current pricing in your geography.
References in this document to IBM products or services do not imply that IBM intends to make them available in every country.
The information could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically made to the information herein; these changes will be incorporated in new editions of the publication. IBM may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described in this publication at any time without notice.
Any references in this information to non-IBM Web sites are provided for convenience only and do not in any manner serve as an endorsement of those Web sites. The materials at those Web sites are not part of the materials for this IBM product and use of those Web sites is at your own risk.
Trademarks