I ndia-Support for Teacher Education Program 2013
description
Transcript of I ndia-Support for Teacher Education Program 2013
India-Support for Teacher Education
Program 2013
Presenter: Rajni Jha State/Group: Madhya Pradesh
Title: Improve Pedagogy in Mathematics
INTRODUCTION
The training program was focused on mainly these areas:-1.Academic support 2. USA schools visits
3.Cultural visits
ACADEMIC SUPPORT
Reflection on NCF- 2005,NCFTE-2009 Research on “Good teacher” by Prof. C.M. Clark Gender Equity and Inclusion Classroom instruction by B J Stone Evaluation methods of NIET- USA Hippocratic Oath Seminar on early childhood Democracy Leadership Behavioral managements, writing skills, sustainability, science
teaching, poverty etc. Technology classes with all new skills and technical support Library support with books and online e-books.
USA Schools Visits
Power Ranch elementary school (highly high school) Adam elementary school (mesa high school) Photini’s class at ASU campus Pre school at ASU campus William C. J. elementary school(Glendale high school) Smart board class training
Cultural visits Welcome by Indo -American society Navratri Festival Canyon Lake Gold town visit Sonora dessert Museum visit Kartchner Caverns Caves Tucson excursion Grand canyon visit
Pumpkins Festival Celebration
Washington D.C. Visit
Core Group of Madhya Pradesh We are 5 members from Madhya Pradesh:- Mr. Atul danayak Mr.B.B.gupta Mrs. Ranjeeta Joshi Km. Anjum Ara Mrs. Rajni Jha
Topics Of Reform Proposal
Our topics of reform proposals are as follows:- Atul Danayak- Try outs of new concepts of
proposed D.Ed. Curriculum B.B.P.Gupta- Improvement Mathematics teaching
practices through Support at elementary Level Ranjeeta Joshi- Internship as a partnership model Anjum Ara- Strengthening of classroom practice
teaching in Science Methodology of student teacher
Rajni Jha-Improve Pedagogy in Mathematics
My Reform Proposal Topic
Improve Pedagogy in Mathematics
Rationale N.C.E.R.T., New Delhi conducted Base line in 2001-02 Mid-term Achievement Surveys in 2005-06 and Terminal Achievement Survey in 2009-10. The abilities Madhya Pradesh students found difficult in
Mathematics are as follows:
S.No. Ability % correct in
MP
1 To identify number of triangles in a figure27
2 To calculate perimeter of squares & information about area
36
Action PlanIMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION
What needs to be done?
By whom and when?
What resources? What evidence indicates progress?
How and when will evidence be gathered?
1.Meeing with Principal
Myself, January 1/1/2014
No resource required
Principal will know about the plan
N.A.
2.Core group formation
Principal, January 2/1/2014
DIET faculty- PrincipalO. P. Dixit
Meeting Agenda
N.A.
Continued…..3.Core group orientation
Myself ,January 3/1/2014
Laptop , Projector, Reform project, notebook, pen , chart , marker
Core group will be able to improve their professional development
N.A.
4.School ObservationTeacher opinion (Questionnaire)Pre Test
Core group 4/1/20136/1/2013
QuestionnairePre test
Analysis of questionnaire & Pre test
Analysis of Questionnaire and Pre-test On 6/1/2014
Continued…….
5. Mathematics pool formation
Myself and core group, January 07/01/2014
Head masters and 2 teachers of Thatipur Gaon PSMahalgaon PS2 trainees
Mathematics pool formed N.A.
6. .Mathematics pool orientation
08/01/2014 Laptop, projector,notebook
Orientation of Mathematics Pool
N.A.
Continued…..
7.Teaching Learning Material development workshop
Myself and core group, January 13/01/2014 to 17/01/2014
Notebook, flowchart pen, chart, pencil, marker, scissor,etc.
Teaching Learning Material T.L.M. are ready to use
8.Teaching Learning Material testing at DIET Level(Micro teaching)
Myself and core group20/01/2014
Teaching Learning Material stationery
Primary teachers will know the proper use of T.L.M.
T.L.M. are ready to use
Continued….
9.Try out of Teaching learning material in selected 2 primary schools
Selected school’s Math teachers, Jan 21/01/2014
Teaching Learning Material
Student’s feedback With the help of assessment tool in Jan 2014
10.Day by day feed back
Myself and core group
Teachers, Student teachers, school students
Exercise analysis Feedbackchecklist
Continued….
11.Improvement in Teaching Learning Material
Myself and core group21/01/2014 to March 2014
Teaching Learning Material
According to feedbackobservation
Feedback Checklist
12. Questionnaire + Post test
Myself, core group February 2014, March 2014.
Assessment tools and Post test
Feedback of assessment tools & post test
With the help of assessment tool in Feb & March 2014
Continued……13.Analysis of data
Myself and core group ,April 2014.
Assessment tools and Post test
Assessment tools , observation and post test
With the help of assessment tool in July 2014
14.Reports & Recommendations
Core GroupMay 2014
Analysis of Data and Documentation
Sending Data May 2014
15. Future strategies / planning long term objectives
Myself, core group, resource pool and other primary schools Math teachers.
Long term plan Academic Performance of students
N.A.
Potential Benefits
pedagogy in Mathematics at primary level as per
proposed curriculum of D.Ed. will be easier. It will help the teachers to understand pedagogy of
Mathematics. Teachers will improve their professional
development and professional competencies. It will helpful for students in future.
Final Evaluation Outcomes
April 2014 Based on Tap Rubric outcomes. On the basis of written assessment test Observation of classrooms practices All datas will be documented, analyse and will use
for future strategies.
Long term planning
A meeting will be conduct on May, 2014 in DIET. In this meeting core group members, pool
members, and selected 2 school’s teachers will participate.
During this meeting an implementation plan will be developed to achieve long term objectives.
Thank You