“I don´t need to be angry anymore, because now I can decide for myself!” (Ruth 66) Bjørn-Eirik...

8
“I don´t need to be angry anymore, because now I can decide for myself!” (Ruth 66) Bjørn-Eirik Johnsen e- mail: ([email protected]) Leif S, Lysvik e-mail: ([email protected]) Terje Thomsen e- mail: ([email protected]) Academic staff at Harstad University College in Norway. SHLD Conference The Open University, Milton Keynes, 8 th July 2013

Transcript of “I don´t need to be angry anymore, because now I can decide for myself!” (Ruth 66) Bjørn-Eirik...

“I don´t need to be angry anymore, because now I can decide for myself!” (Ruth 66)

Bjørn-Eirik Johnsen e- mail: ([email protected])Leif S, Lysvik e-mail: ([email protected])Terje Thomsen e- mail: ([email protected])

Academic staff at Harstad University College in Norway.

SHLD ConferenceThe Open University, Milton Keynes, 8th July 2013

SHLD Conference The Open University, Milton Keynes, 8th July 2013

All Norwegian institutions closed down in 1991 because of:

Unworthy living conditions inside institutions

Wrong to isolate people only on the basis of their

diagnosis

SHLD Conference The Open University, Milton Keynes, 8th July 2013

This is Ruth

• A lady in her 60- ties• A former inmate at an institution• Many interests• Creative

Collector

Writer

A photographer

Engaged in sports

Enjoys nature

SHLD Conference The Open University, Milton Keynes, 8th July 2013

Ruths story: inside the institution

• Missed her parents and felt terrible

• Regarded as unstable

• Tried to adapt

• Forced to give up personal stuff

• No use in protesting

• Hoped to die.

• Ruth: It was hopeless– Denied free entrance– Denied free access to food or

drink– Force fed with medicine

SHLD Conference The Open University, Milton Keynes, 8th July 2013

Outside the institution: resent years

Gradually, Ruth experienced having more influence

Important milestones:

1. Ruth was given a say over which of the service providers was allowed to work with her

2. The service providers were trained to respect Ruth’s everyday wishes/ self determination

3. Ruth became a true participant in meetings where decisions regarding her everyday life were made.