I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success...
-
Upload
isabel-smith -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success...
I-15 Managed Lanes:Building on Success
And Lessons Learned
I-15 Managed Lanes:Building on Success
And Lessons Learned
• I-15 Express/Managed Lanes
• Value Pricing Study & Public Outreach Results
• Operational Considerations
• Lessons Learned
• I-15 Express/Managed Lanes
• Value Pricing Study & Public Outreach Results
• Operational Considerations
• Lessons Learned
Overview of PresentationOverview of Presentation
Managed Lanes RoadmapManaged Lanes RoadmapManaged Lanes RoadmapManaged Lanes Roadmap
2030 San Diego Region Managed Lanes Network
Current I-15 Managed Lanes ProjectSR 52 Managed Lanes
Existing Reversible I-15 Express Lanes
SR 125 South Bay Expressway (2007)
I-5 Managed Lanes
I-805 Managed Lanes
Original Express LanesOriginal Express LanesOriginal Express LanesOriginal Express Lanes
• 2-Lane reversible
• Barrier separated
• Per-trip pricing uses FasTrak® electronic toll collection
• 2-Lane reversible
• Barrier separated
• Per-trip pricing uses FasTrak® electronic toll collection
• Interoperable in California
• First dynamic pricing project
• Fees set to keep traffic free flowing
• Interoperable in California
• First dynamic pricing project
• Fees set to keep traffic free flowing
Why Managed Lanes ?Why Managed Lanes ?Why Managed Lanes ?Why Managed Lanes ?
• Expands travel options in the corridor
• Expands travel options in the corridor
• Increased use of HOV Lanes• Increased use of HOV Lanes
Usage doubled following introduction of FasTrak
• Generates revenue; can help pay for corridor transit service
• Generates revenue; can help pay for corridor transit service
Over $7 million provided to MTS between 1997 – 2006
Public Support for ML ProgramPublic Support for ML ProgramPublic Support for ML ProgramPublic Support for ML Program
Approval of FasTrak Approval of FasTrak Program By GroupProgram By GroupApproval of FasTrak Approval of FasTrak Program By GroupProgram By Group
Don’t Know6%
Approve66%
Disapprove28%
Other I-15 Users
Don’t Know1%
Approve88%
Disapprove11%
FasTrak Customer
Conducted public outreach
• Stakeholder interviews
• Phone / intercept surveys
• Focus groups
Conducted public outreach
• Stakeholder interviews
• Phone / intercept surveys
• Focus groups
Would you support or oppose Would you support or oppose construction of similar construction of similar “managed lane” facilities in “managed lane” facilities in freeway corridors throughout freeway corridors throughout San Diego County?San Diego County?
Would you support or oppose Would you support or oppose construction of similar construction of similar “managed lane” facilities in “managed lane” facilities in freeway corridors throughout freeway corridors throughout San Diego County?San Diego County?
Oppose20%
Support76%
No Opinion4%
Public Support for Managed LanesPublic Support for Managed LanesPublic Support for Managed LanesPublic Support for Managed Lanes
Public Opinion Survey, 2004Public Opinion Survey, 2004
Would you support or oppose Would you support or oppose construction of similar construction of similar “managed lane” facilities in “managed lane” facilities in freeway corridors throughout freeway corridors throughout San Diego County?San Diego County?
Would you support or oppose Would you support or oppose construction of similar construction of similar “managed lane” facilities in “managed lane” facilities in freeway corridors throughout freeway corridors throughout San Diego County?San Diego County?
Oppose20%
Support76%
No Opinion4%
Do you believe a new system Do you believe a new system of BRT and carpools on of BRT and carpools on “managed lanes” …would “managed lanes” …would reduce traffic congestion in reduce traffic congestion in the region?the region?
Do you believe a new system Do you believe a new system of BRT and carpools on of BRT and carpools on “managed lanes” …would “managed lanes” …would reduce traffic congestion in reduce traffic congestion in the region?the region?
No25%
Yes73%
Don’t Know 3%
Age Ethnicity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Total 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ White Hisp. Asian
Likelihood to Use Managed LanesLikelihood to Use Managed LanesLikelihood to Use Managed LanesLikelihood to Use Managed LanesHow likely are you to use the planned I-15 Managed Lanes? (as How likely are you to use the planned I-15 Managed Lanes? (as FasTrak or carpool)FasTrak or carpool)How likely are you to use the planned I-15 Managed Lanes? (as How likely are you to use the planned I-15 Managed Lanes? (as FasTrak or carpool)FasTrak or carpool)
Comparison of FacilitiesComparison of FacilitiesComparison of FacilitiesComparison of Facilities
20 miles and 4 lanes
Access every 2-3 miles
41 toll locations
Movable barrier
Concurrent flow
24/7 operations
Price per mile
Value of Time Pricing
Routine and automated enforcement
20 miles and 4 lanes
Access every 2-3 miles
41 toll locations
Movable barrier
Concurrent flow
24/7 operations
Price per mile
Value of Time Pricing
Routine and automated enforcement
I-15 Express LanesI-15 Express Lanes I-15 Managed LanesI-15 Managed Lanes
8 miles
2 lanes
Access at two ends only
Reversible
Peak direction
Closed weeknights after 7:00 p.m.
Price per trip
Routine enforcement
8 miles
2 lanes
Access at two ends only
Reversible
Peak direction
Closed weeknights after 7:00 p.m.
Price per trip
Routine enforcement
I-15 Managed Lanes SignageI-15 Managed Lanes SignageI-15 Managed Lanes SignageI-15 Managed Lanes Signage
• Static portions of the sign will provide directional information such as turn movement guidance
• Inlaid dynamic message boards will broadcast toll rates and offer the possibility for value-added content such as travel times to nearest destination
• Static portions of the sign will provide directional information such as turn movement guidance
• Inlaid dynamic message boards will broadcast toll rates and offer the possibility for value-added content such as travel times to nearest destination
Typical Intermediate Access Point Entry Sign (from General Purpose Lane)
Typical Intermediate Access Point Entry Sign (from General Purpose Lane)
Typical Direct Access Ramp Entry Sign (from BRT Station)
Typical Direct Access Ramp Entry Sign (from BRT Station)
• Signage will guide users to Managed Lanes entry and exit locations
• Signage will guide users to Managed Lanes entry and exit locations
I-15 Managed Lanes AccessI-15 Managed Lanes AccessI-15 Managed Lanes AccessI-15 Managed Lanes Access
Lane ReconfigurationLane ReconfigurationLane ReconfigurationLane Reconfiguration
I-15 ML Project StatusI-15 ML Project Status
New 8 miles of 4-lane configuration is complete and operational (16 miles total)
Improved Pricing Models
Exploration of Automated Violation Enforcement Strategies
Vehicle Occupancy Testing to take place in 2010.
I-15 Managed Lanes PricingI-15 Managed Lanes PricingI-15 Managed Lanes PricingI-15 Managed Lanes Pricing• Distance-Based Fare
– Driver charged on a per-mile basis
– Fare = per-mile rate * distance traveled in Managed Lanes
• Dynamic Pricing– Per-mile rate varies by Level of Service
(LOS) in the Express Lanes
– Goal: Maintain “free flow” on ML at all times
• Value of Time Saved = “Premium Trip”– Soon – LOS in the GP lanes will influence
the Dynamic Pricing calculation as well. The greater the value of time savings offered by the Managed Lanes, the greater the fare
• Distance-Based Fare– Driver charged on a per-mile basis
– Fare = per-mile rate * distance traveled in Managed Lanes
• Dynamic Pricing– Per-mile rate varies by Level of Service
(LOS) in the Express Lanes
– Goal: Maintain “free flow” on ML at all times
• Value of Time Saved = “Premium Trip”– Soon – LOS in the GP lanes will influence
the Dynamic Pricing calculation as well. The greater the value of time savings offered by the Managed Lanes, the greater the fare
20¢
20¢
10¢
10¢
10¢
30¢
30¢
I-15 ML Enforcement StrategiesI-15 ML Enforcement StrategiesI-15 ML Enforcement StrategiesI-15 ML Enforcement Strategies
• Rely on CHP for deterrence
• Potential use of violation enforcement cameras
– Declaration Method
• Other technologies to aid CHP in enforcement:
– iPhones with central computer connectivity
– Transaction status lights
• Rely on CHP for deterrence
• Potential use of violation enforcement cameras
– Declaration Method
• Other technologies to aid CHP in enforcement:
– iPhones with central computer connectivity
– Transaction status lights
Enforcement Strategy Enforcement Strategy ConsiderationsConsiderations
Without Vehicle Occupancy - Cameras and plate /vehicle recognition requires declaration– lane selection, registration or switchable transponders
Public acceptance of HOV transponders– In Southern CA, use of transponders for HOV’s viewed favorably by majority,
particularly if incentives were provided
Privacy issues
Barriers to traditional use of HOV lanes
SANDAG - Future HOV transponder pilot - more statewide coordination
Vehicle Occupancy Strategies Vehicle Occupancy Strategies
SANDAG Occupancy Project Development Team– Internal/External Stakeholders
Procurement document created for candidate system(s)
Integrator selected - Testing to begin in 2010
Privacy issues with occupancy cameras not a major
issue, particularly with no individual ID of occupants
Vehicle Occupancy Testing Vehicle Occupancy Testing
Dtect Camera had been selected for initial testing
Project Charter
Test requirements developed
Test Plan developed
Lessons Learned Lessons Learned
Local champion and political will are invaluable
Need corridor-level public outreach and market research
Project within the context of integrated multi-modal plans
Lessons Learned (Continued)Lessons Learned (Continued)
Federal “seed” money important in combination with local funding initiatives
Information/research sharing among other agencies is key
Federal support for the necessary R&D and information sharing also key.
Lessons Learned (Continued)Lessons Learned (Continued)
Design: Focus on Requirements document as springboard for design and for all future changes
Flexibility and adaptation
Team approach with System Integrator
Phasing as key to keeping project moving forward
Thank You ?Thank You ?