Hyperspectral Imaging applications in art and archaeology PRESENTING: OMER PAPARO JANUARY 2013.
-
Upload
kathryn-blankenship -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
Transcript of Hyperspectral Imaging applications in art and archaeology PRESENTING: OMER PAPARO JANUARY 2013.
Hyperspectral Imaging applications in art and
archaeology
PRESENTI NG:OMER PAPAROJANUARY 2013
Agenda
Introduction Motivation Limitations
Spectral imaging systemsPigment identification
The Kubelka-Munk theory of reflectanceInvestigating materials present on artifactsRevealing hidden information
In paintings Studying archaeological manuscripts
Art conservation Conserving paintings Best illuminants for viewing art
Introduction
Motivation Traditional methods are often invasive
E.g., micro-chemical analysis of images HI is non invasive
Can be carried out essentially on any object Can be carried out anywhere on an object
Limitations Requires exposure to light
Some artifacts suffer light-induced ageing Not always as accurate as traditional methods
Invasive chemical analyses, for instance, almost always yield more chemically specific information
Spectral imaging systems
Illumination Light exposure must be kept at a minimum (both duration
and intensity) Assuming the reciprocity principle ~200 lux for oil paintings, ~50 lux for manuscripts
Wavelength selection Wavelength selection through illumination
Only a selected wavelength range of light is incident on the object at a time Economic exposure, yet sensitive to background light
Wavelength selection in the reflected light Light reflected from the object can be separated spectrally Can collect spectral data sequentially or simultaneously
Detector
Spectral imaging systems
Working scheme:
Spectral imaging systems
Measurement at the Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy - Leonardo room
Pigment identification
Introduction – What are paintings made of? A pigment is a colored material ground into a fine
powder After the grinding it is suspended in some type of media
that acts as a binder to hold the dry pigments pigment together E.g. linseed oil for oil paints
Over the eras, many different pigments were used
Pigment identification
E.g., the late gothic palette
Pigment identification
E.g., the late Italian Renaissance palette
Pigment identification
The main challenge is unmixing measured reflectance to separate reflectances of different materials Linear unmixing won’t work here – the mixing is not
linear (materials can be mixed almost to atomic level)
Pigment identification
Measuring reflectance is relatively easy Suppose we’ve measured for some pixel, for same
wavelength , the reflectance The ratio between the outgoing light and the incoming light Now what?
That reflectance, R, must be a combination of reflectances of more than one material found in that pixel But how can we separate them?
Maybe the combined reflectance is a linear combination of those reflectances?• Well, not exactly
Introducing the Kubelka-Munk theory of reflectance
Pigment identification
The Kubelka-Munk Theory of Reflectance: dx +Sdx dx +Sdx
Where K is theabsorption coefficientand S is thescattering coefficient
Pigment identification
The Kubelka-Munk Theory of Reflectance (cont’d): It thus can be achieved that Defining as the reflectance of the sheet and we get
that , hence
Pigment identification
The Kubelka-Munk Theory of Reflectance (cont’d): Rearranging and integrating we get: . Solving this
yields , where and So assuming:
(no light gets to the back) (particle sizes are much smaller than the thickness of
the layer)
We can achieve that
Pigment identification
The Kubelka-Munk Theory of Reflectance (cont’d): Other than cases in which the absorption is very high
or the scattering is very low, a mixture of different paint components can be modeled as a linear combination of K/S (weights are according to concentrations)
Can predict components of mixture! Graph shows mixture of
read earth and azuritein egg tempera
KM can fail E.g., in the mix of pure indigo and orpiment Would not have failed if the indigo was mixed with
lead white
Pigment identification
But generally, KM is robust Can handle varying:
Concentrations Binding medium Particles size
Investigating materials present on artifacts
Similarly to pigment identification, we can perform analysis on 3D objects E.g., exploring the surface of
Michelangelo's David Basically the sculpture is made of
marble, but over the years some“guests” have joined
Investigating materials present on artifacts
Collecting and analyzing the data A UV ( = 337 nm) excitation light is provided by a
nitrogen laser that generates 1 ns pulses N pulses are delivered and the emission is measured
Assuming mono-exponential behavior of the fluorescent emission, f, we get that (per pixel) Where is the amplitude and is the effective lifetime
Given the pulse was provided with delay d, we can acquire the fluence: Where is the gate width and is a constant dependent on
the efficiency of the detection system
Investigating materials present on artifacts
Collecting and analyzing the data (cont’d) The effective lifetime and the amplitude can be
reconstructed by least mean squares fit performance on N time samples:
Can build matrices of and
Investigating materials present on artifacts
Results Spectral signature is different than the one of “pure
marble”
Investigating materials present on artifacts
Results (cont’d) Can identify organic compounds
Investigating materials present on artifacts
Results (cont’d) Can identify remains of beeswax
David’s surface underwent aconservation treatmentbased on beeswax in 1813
Revealing hidden information
For paintings: Maximum penetration of most paints can be achieved
at wavelengths of around 2 μm At wavelengths around 1-2 μm, the common drawing
materials, namely iron gall ink and sepia, become invisible
Can use this to see underdrawings and preparatory sketches
Revealing hidden information
A Byzantine icon at 640nm (a) and 1000nm(b)
Revealing hidden information
Pablo Picasso –“The Tragedy”
Revealing hidden information
The optimal spectral window to visualize such features varies with the material used as well as the thickness of the paint layer
Man, ~1100nm
Horse, ~1350nm
Sketch, ~1600nm
Revealing hidden information
A painting by Sellaio
520nm 885nm RGB
Revealing hidden information
Revealing hidden information
Studying archaeological manuscripts “Soft media” ancient documents (i.e. documents
written on soft materials such as leather or papyrus) are often unreadable The carbon-black ink is faded beyond recognition The carbon-black ink indistinguishable from the surface Not to mention the document itself is found in shreds
Revealing hidden information
Studying archaeological manuscripts Can use IR to read previously invisible texts and
scripts The dead sea scrolls can only be seen through IR light
Art conservation
Conserving Paintings Can fix damage using hidden information revealing
techniques The color image is derived from inter-band comparisons
Art conservation
Conserving Paintings (cont’d) Conservation monitoring
Can identify continual damage to paintings, for example From a lamp in front of the painting From a pipe going through the ceiling
Art conservation
Best illuminants for viewing art Which one looks better?
Art conservation
Best illuminants for viewing art (cont’d) An illuminant for
appreciating art isconsidered betterif number ofdiscernible coloursis greater
Illuminants aremeasured indegrees Kalvin
Art conservation
Best illuminants for viewing art (cont’d) The experiment:
1. Collect hyperspectral data from five different paintings
Art conservation
Best illuminants for viewing art (cont’d) The experiment:
2. Calculate the illuminant spectra 3. Compute the painting representation in CIELAB
Art conservation
Best illuminants for viewing art (cont’d) The experiment:
4. Count the number of non-empty unit cubes in the CIELAB space, and select best illuminant
Concluding
Today we have seen: Basic structures of spectral imaging systems for art
and manuscripts Uses for hyperspectal imaging in art and archeology:
Identifying pigments used for paintings Investigating materials present on artifacts Viewing underlying sketches for paintings Studying old and corrupted-by-time documents Conserving art
Protecting art from harm Viewing in with best illuminant
References
H. Liang - Advances in multispectral and hyperspectral imaging for archaeology and art conservation – 2011
C. Fischer and I. Kakoulli - Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging technologies in conservation: current research and potential applications – 2006
J. K. Delaney et al - Visible and Infrared Reflectance Imaging Spectroscopy of Paintings: Pigment Mapping and Improved Infrared Reflectography – 2009
F. Voltolini et al - Integration of non-invasive techniques for documentation and preservation of complex architectures and artwork
J.A. Carvalhal et al - Estimating the best illuminants for appreciation of art paintings
G.H. Bear-man et al - Archeological Applications of Advanced imaging Techniques
D. Comelli et al - Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of Michelangelo’s David - 2005
Thank you
Questions?