HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate...

28
HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium Enabling twice the energy density for onboard H 2 storage Brandon Wood Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX: This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Project ID #: ST207

Transcript of HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate...

Page 1: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Enabling twice the energy density for onboard H2 storage

Brandon Wood Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX: This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Project ID #: ST207

Page 2: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Overview

Timeline

Phase II start date: 10/1/2018

Phase II end date: 9/30/2022*

Budget

Total FY19 funds: $4.3M Total FY20 (planned): $6.25M

Barriers addressed

• Lack of understanding of hydrogen physisorption and chemisorption (Barrier O)

• System weight and volume (Barrier A) • Charge/discharge rate (Barrier E)

Partners

Sandia (lead) NIST NREL (lead) SLAC PNNL ORNL LBNL LLNL

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

*Project continuation determined annually by DOE 1

Page 3: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Relevance: Comprehensive modeling & simulation strategy enables close integration with HyMARC activities

Real materials under real conditions

Multiscale modeling

Experiment-theory integration

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

(c)

2

Page 4: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Relevance: How is theory helping with progress towards targets?

(c)

Mg -H

Host

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Sc

Y

Ca, Sr

ZrTi

V, Nb

Assess • Understand physical interaction of hydrogen with existing materials to

focus improvement strategies on highest-sensitivity factors

Interpret • Interpret characterization and testing data in terms of materials chemistry

& microstructure to connect composition, processing, and performance

Model • Create new models and tools to explore the limits of the most promising

improvement strategies (e.g., nanoconfinement)

Explain • Provide foundational insight into origins of experimental successes that

are “moving the bar”

Design • Guide strategies for new materials design and connect system-level

performance models to materials-level parameters

3

Page 5: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Approach: Capabilities address key HyMARC priorities

• Accurate physisorption energies (vdW DFT)

• Thermodynamic prediction & calibration (DFT & AIMD)

• Chemical mechanisms at interfaces (DFT & AIMD)

• Spectroscopy modeling (DFT)

• Confinement and nanoscale effects (DFT, effective medium)

• Non-equilibrium mass transport (MD, KMC, phase field)

• Solid-state phase transformation kinetics (phase field)

• Semiempirical kinetic analysis (continuum)

• Catalyst pathways, stability, and microkinetic modeling (DFT, hybrid DFT/continuum)

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

4

Page 6: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Approach: Simulations span multiple scales

MgB2

Atomic/molecular (0 – 1 nm)

Molecular/micro (0.5 – 2 nm)

Mesoscale (2 - 100 nm)

Grains (≤ 10 �m)

Macroscale/Bulk

Computational Spectroscopy Bulk

Reacting layer

MgB2

Grain boundaries Particle size effects

Stress/strain

Thermodynamics Mixing

pH2

(bar

) Mg(BH4 )2

1/6

MgB

12H 1

2 +

5/6

MgH

2 +

13/6

H 2

1/6 MgB12 H12 + 5/6 Mg + 3 H2

MgB2 + 4 H2

Hydrogen Nucleation kinetics chemisorption & Surface/interface Phase microstructures

physisorption chemistry

Density functional theory & Classical molecular dynamics & Phase-field modeling & Ab initio ab initio molecular dynamics microkinetic modeling microelasticity thermodynamics

10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2

Length (m) Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

10-10

5

Page 7: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Accomplishments and progress towards modeling milestones

FY19Q3: Develop computational approach for screening additives to activate B-B bonds in MgB2 (100%) • Screening approach was finalized and prepared for publication

FY19Q4: Demonstrate >6% reversible capacity for Li-N-H based on predicted composition (100%) • Theory contribution predicted size-dependent thermodynamics including surface entropy

FY20Q1: Data Hub determination of HyMARC data needs (100%) • Coded predicted reaction diagrams for backend implementation

FY20Q2: Assemble computational database of metal hydride thermodynamic properties (100%) • Existing hydride database was catalogued and machine learning classifiers were applied; new

complex hydride free energy calculations were completed

FY20Q4: Demonstrate confinement stress as an engineering strategy (50%) • Implemented new extensions of confinement stress prediction and initiated validation strategy through

strategic partnership with KAIST (Korea)

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

6

Page 8: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Sorbents: Performance of density functionals for H2 physisorption

Performed comprehensive assessment of density functionals for H2 physisorption by comparing with “gold standard” coupled-cluster calculations on a large data set

• ωB97X-V and PBE0-DH are the best performers but with high cost • B97M-V provides the best compromise between accuracy and cost

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

7

Page 9: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Metal hydrides: Data science approach improves thermodynamic predictions by calibrating against reference values

Computed Mg-B-H free energies were corrected against experimental thermodynamics data using a new constrained optimization approach that retains underlying physics

Predicted Mg-B-H reaction diagram exp

t. Mg / M

gH 2

equili

brium

Mg ( B H 4 ) 2

1/6 M

gB12

H 12 +

5/6 M

gH2

+ 13/6

H 2

1/ 6 M gB 12 H 12 + 5 / 6 M g + 3 H 2

Mg B 2 + 4 H 2

Temperature (°C)

Inconsistent with measured reference data

• Accurate predictions optimize cycling conditions and define materials limitations

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Calculate free energies: G(T) = E0K_DFT + E0 - b + C *

T* ln(�/T) – (D+a) * T2

Estimate confidence of computed data

Cost function definition and minimization

BOBYQA

Bound optimization by quadratic approximation

Calibrated reaction diagram

Temperature (°C)

Improved match without loss of generality

• We are now correcting the high-T, low-P regime with new data from HyMARC partners

8

Page 10: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Metal hydrides: Thermodynamics of nanoscale metal hydrides

We successfully demonstrated our method for determining tunability limits of nanoscaling due to enthalpy-entropy compensation

Increased surface entropy Enthalpy and entropy competition for nanoparticles

• Enthalpy-entropy tradeoffs can be predicted to determine which hydride reaction pathways can be favorably altered by nanosizing

• Entropy for nanoparticle surfaces is up to twice that of bulk

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

9

Page 11: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Metal hydrides: Enabling reversibility via nanoconfinement

Toolkit for predicting size-dependent reactions was used to assess changes in reaction landscape for reversibility of nanoconfined LiAlH4 in porous carbon

• Nanosizing destabilizes Li3AlH6 intermediate, consistent with 27Al NMR • Nanoconfinement and interaction with N-doped carbon shifts thermodynamics to enable

reversibility of LiAlH4 for the first time

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

10

Page 12: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Arrh

eniu

s Plo

tsBa

rrier

Dist

ribut

ion

Metal hydrides: Dynamics simulations of hydrogen diffusion

11

Molecular dynamics calculations help to assess mass transport limitations in MgH2

• Diffusion rates change with concentration and structure• Analytical fits link atomic-scale diffusion to continuum models that can

guide microstructural design for optimized kinetics11

Page 13: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Metal hydrides: Direct simulations provide guidance for activating chemical bonds

12

Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations reveal how local substoichiometrymediates charge fluctuations to induce chemistry for faster reversibility of MgB2

Excess negative charge on B dissociates H2 and facilitates

B-H formation

Mg-rich edges facilitate BH4

- formation

B-rich edges facilitate B-B bond breaking

Weakened pi bonding from charge depletion causes bond

rearrangement

• Different MgB2 edge chemistries lead to very different bond activation character, guiding strategies for design of proper additives

Page 14: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Metal hydrides: Plasmonics as a novel method for faster H2 release

13

Ongoing band alignment calculations provide insight into plasmonic interactions for pristine and oxidized MgH2 on plasmonically active TiN for rapid H2 release

Metal-MgH2 junction Metal-oxide-MgH2 junction

• Plasmonically activated electrons are predicted to accelerate H2 release, but surface oxidation or formation of Mg at the interface frustrates charge transfer

Page 15: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Metal hydrides: Improved description of interfacial reaction within the DRINK (de)hydrogenation model framework

Our (de)hydrogenation kinetics model was improved to include interfacial chemical reactions in complex hydridesAtomistic modeling

Kang et al., ChemPhysChem (2019)

Reaction coordinate�1.0

�0.8

�0.6

�0.4

�0.2

0.0

0.2

Free

Ene

rgy

[eV

]/NaA

lH4

unit

NaAlH4 (bulk)

NaAlH4(interface)

NaAlH4 + Na3AlH6 (reaction zone)

Na3AlH6(interface)

Na3AlH6 (bulk)

NaAlH4 Na3AlH6

Reaction Zone

NaAlH4⇌!"

Na3AlH6 + #"

Al + H2

Mesoscale modeling

Simulated microstructure

NaAlH4 Na3AlH6

AlNaAlH4/Na3AlH6Al

Snider et al. (SNL)

STXM Experiment

Comparison with experiment

• We are comparing simulations with STXM experiments for validation on NaAlH4 as a model material

• Our model will enable broad parametric studies to determine rate-limiting steps for complex hydrides

14

Page 16: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Metal hydrides: Impact of microstructure on thermal transport

A possible rate limitation in metal hydrides is poor heat distribution, so we established an efficient model for investigating the microstructure-thermal transport relationship

15

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Porosity

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Effe

ctiv

e Th

erm

al C

ondu

ctiv

ity (W

/m.K

)

AirHe

MgH2

Experiments(collaborator)

Predicted thermal conductivity of packed MgH2 powder

MgH2Mg

Air

rGO

• Simulated thermal conductivities are consistent with experimental measurements from KAIST-HyMARC collaboration

• Validated model is being applied to investigate more practical composites

Page 17: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

H2 carriers: Determining binding sites for porous liquid carrier design

16

• Understanding can be used to guideco-design of ionic liquids and porousframeworks for optimizing H2 capacity

H2 H2

Simulations clarify how bmim-BArF ionic liquid may incorporate into a TpPa-1 COF to provide binding sites for H2 in the composite structure

bmim-BArF IL

△E=-2.19 eV

COF

Page 18: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

H2 carriers: Unified theory framework for thermal & electrocatalysis

Explicit environment

Thermal & electrocatalysis

NATUREMATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4803 REVIEW ARTICLEa b c

d e f

o∗

o∗ o∗ o∗

o∗ o∗

o

o o o

o o

Figure 1 | Two alternative mechanisms for water dissociation at surface oxygen bridges, as observed in the first-principles simulations of the fullinterface of liquid water with InP(001), when a submonolayer surface oxide is present. The sites denoted as O and O⇤ refer to proton donor and acceptoroxygens, respectively. a–c, The first scenario features a donor water molecule bound to one of the edge In atoms adjacent to O⇤, and transferring a protonacross the O–H...O⇤ complex. d–f, The second scenario has the donor water molecule bound to an In atom that is not part of the In–O⇤–In bridge. In thisinstance, water molecules in solution act as intermediaries in a Grotthuss chain for site-to-site proton transfer. Colour scheme: O, red; H, white; In, green;P, grey. Reproduced from ref. 66, ACS.

oxygens present on many III–V and common oxide materials ininterfacial chemistry. In particular, the simulations showed thatmolecular adsorption of water molecules is favourable on thepristine InP(001) and GaP(001) surfaces, while water dissociationbecomes strongly exothermic when chemisorbed oxygen is present.As a result, chemisorbed oxygens lead to the formation of densehydroxylated surfaces and complex proton transfer mechanism atthe interface as demonstrated in Fig. 166.

Similar hydroxylation processes may also occur on otheroxide photoelectrode surfaces with native oxygens. For example,Fe2O3 (001) shows a fast hydroxylation process in contact withliquid water that stems from water dissociation via direct protontransfer to the surface oxygens70. On the other hand, surfacehydroxylation may proceed without the presence of surface oxygen.For example, simulations of water interfaced with GaN and ZnOshowed that water adsorption is substantially dissociative on bothpristine surfaces69. In this case, the surface anions act as basesaccepting protons from dissociated water molecules, while thecorresponding OH� ions bond with surface cations. An importantfinding is that surface N-sites exhibit a stronger basic character andare protonated even more readily than surface oxygen sites, andthus the GaN surface displays a higher degree of water dissociationcompared with ZnO. All surface Ga sites are found to bond toOH� ions, while theZnones are bonded either toOH� ions or intactwater molecules.

Finally, we briefly discuss TiO2/water interfaces, which havebeen extensively studied due to the first discovery of photocatalyticwater splitting on titania3. However, a complete review is beyondthe scope of this paper and we refer readers to refs 71,75 fora more detailed discussion. Despite the intense e�ort devotedto TiO2, some fundamental aspects of the interaction of itssurfaces with water are not yet well understood. Most notably,the question of whether water adsorption is associative ordissociative on the ideal rutile(110) surface is still a subject ofcontroversy. Di�erent experimental studies have reported resultsvarying from no dissociation76,77 to partial dissociation73,78. Similardi�erences were also found in theoretical studies, where bothpartial79–82 and fully associated72,83 states have been reported.A reason for such discrepancies in simulations is likely to

stem from di�erent theoretical approximations, especially thosefor the exchange–correlation functional, and the details of thecomputational set-up such as the choice of supercell size and thethickness of the semiconductor surfacemodels71.We emphasize thatcareful testing of technical details and numerical approximationsis extremely important, not only for the study of TiO2 but alsofor the study of any other photoelectrode material. Moreover,the existence of such controversies even for a well-studied casesuch as TiO2 highlights the need for experimental validation oftheoretical results on structural models by highly characterizedsamples. Computational and experimental vibrational spectroscopymay greatly contribute to validate structural models, for examplevibrational signatures of OH groups may be detected in sum-frequency-generation experiments84 and information of chargetransfer processes at surfaces may be obtained in in situ scanning-tunnelling-microscope measurements.

Electronic properties. One of the important factors thatdetermines the performance of PECs is the energy alignmentbetween photoelectrode band edges and water redox potentials.Several approaches have been adopted to evaluate this quantity,many of which neglected the e�ect of liquid water in order toreduce the computational complexity, thereby allowing for theuse of a high level of theory, such as the GW approximation, ata reasonable computational cost85,86. Further attempts have beenmade to estimate the approximate e�ect of liquid water based onthe comparison between band edges computed without water andthose measured electrochemically at the point of zero charge87.These calculations provided useful, qualitative information, butthey did not account for the complex structure and chemistry at thephotoelectrode/water interface, which, as we discuss below, can beof key importance.

Theoretical studies of the electronic properties of photoelectrodeabsorbers with an explicit treatment of the semiconductor/liquidinterface have so far been rather sparse, especially at a level of theorybeyond DFT. For example, GGA approximation was employedto compute TiO2(110) band edge positions in aqueous solutions,showing substantial errors with respect to experiments due to thelimitation of GGAs in treating excited-state properties64. A more

NATUREMATERIALS | VOL 16 | APRIL 2017 | www.nature.com/naturematerials

© 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.

403

Implicit environment

Thermal & electrocatalysis

Φ = –0.5 V

0.20 M0.15 M0.10 M

17

Gas phase

Thermal catalysis

We treat systems at three different levels of approximation to understand energy landscape and predict efficiency, selectivity, and durability in different environments

Page 19: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

H2 carriers: Investigating pathways for methanol decomposition

18

We are investigating the efficiency of methanol decomposition on supported Ni nanoparticle and metal MOF-74 catalysts

• Metal in MOF-74 significantly affects reaction energy and barrier height• Interaction with substrate for Ni-supported catalyst crucially alters energy landscape• Defective substrate immobilizes Ni nanoparticles to prevent sintering

MOF-74 with different active metals Computed reaction diagrams show dependence of energy landscape on Ni catalyst and hBN support

2.04

1.45

0.94

1.35

2.04

1.39

0.99

1.27

Co Mg_1

Mn_1 Ni_1

2.04

1.43 0.95

1.30

Mg_2

Mn_2

Ni_2

2.04

1.45

0.94

1.35

2.04

1.39

0.99

1.27

Co Mg_1

2.08 1.43

0.96

1.30

Mn_1

2.01

1.40 0.97

1.27

Ni_1

Zn

2.04

1.43 0.95

1.30

Mg_2

2.07

1.44 0.95

1.31

Mn_2

Ni_2 Ni_3

2.04

1.45

0.94

1.35

2.04

1.39

0.99

1.27

Co Mg_1

2.08 1.43

0.96

1.30

Mn_1

2.01

1.40 0.97

1.27

Ni_1

Zn

2.04

1.43 0.95

1.30

Mg_2

2.07

1.44 0.95

1.31

Mn_2

Ni_2 Ni_3

2.04

1.45

0.94

1.35

2.04

1.39

0.99

1.27

Co Mg_1

2.08 1.43

0.96

1.30

Mn_1

2.01

1.40 0.97

1.27

Ni_1

2.04

1.42 0.96

1.29

Zn

2.04

1.43 0.95

1.30

Mg_2

2.07

1.44 0.95

1.31

Mn_2

2.01

1.41

0.97

1.29

Ni_2

1.99

1.28

1.05

1.22

Ni_3

Page 20: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

COOH route

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

Pd100 Pd110 Pd111

∆Erxn

HC

OO

H

HCOO formationCOOH formation

H2 carriers: Tuning selectivity in formic acid decomposition

19

We are investigating the role of Pd catalyst facets on selectivity for formic acid decomposition

HCOOH

H* + *COOH H* + *HCOO

2H* + *CO2H* + *CO + *OH

2H* + CO2(g)

H2(g) + CO2(g)

Formate routeCarboxylic acid route

• Pd catalyst geometry and surface morphology can tune selectivity for desired formate decomposition route for higher-efficiency conversion

Page 21: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

H2 carriers: Predicting catalyst conformation & surface activity changes

Catalyst site stability

20

We are predicting the stability and reactivity of catalysts for generation of key H2 carriers with different environments and energy sources (thermal vs. electrical)

Integrated stability prediction

Environment-driven phase

stability

Surface activity

Realistic structure-

performance prediction

Multiscale model

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

Rea

ctio

n En

ergy

(eV)

Pd (100)PdHx (100)

Added reactivity penalty due to Pd

phase change

HCOOH decomposition

Pd (100)PdHx (100)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

HC

OO

* bin

ding

ene

rgy

(eV)

Surface coverage (θ)

Weakened HCOO interaction due to

change in binding mode

HCOO interaction with Pd

δαβγ

Pd fo

r for

mic

aci

d de

com

posi

tion

Catalyst phase stability

Page 22: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Collaboration & coordination

21

Seedling support highlights

U. Hawaii (Godwin Severa)• Guidance on mechanisms of MgB2

decomposition

LiOx/Caltech (John Vajo)• Reaction diagram prediction for Mg-B-H

Colorado School of Mines (Mike McGuirk)• Prediction of kinetics for opening and

closing of framework structures

U. South Carolina (Prof. Morgan Stefik)• Confinement stress effects on hydride

thermodynamics• NSF partnership with HyMARC

External collaborations

KAIST, Korea (Profs. Eun Seon Cho, Seung Min Han, and Bong Jae Lee)• Microstrain and thermal transport in confined

metal hydrides• Multi-institutional partnership launched in

September 2018

Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht (Martin Dornheim)• Mixed metal hydride reactions and phase evolution

AIST, Japan (Minoru Otani)• Hybrid quantum-classical simulations of catalytic

interfaces for hydrogen carriers

• Multi-lab working group focus areas engage core laboratories

HyMARC collaborations

Page 23: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Future work: Materials co-design at multiple scales

22

Individual materials properties• Apply best functionals to enthalpy and entropy within new sorbent designs• Construct validated database of hydride thermodynamics for nanoscale materials• Use models to devise strategies for accelerating chemical bond activation and phase

transformation kinetics• Estimate thermodynamics and kinetics of catalyst efficiency, stability, and durability for

screening H2 carrier reactions

Emergent functional behavior• Determine impacts of complex microstructures and packing geometries on effective

mechanical, thermal, and transport properties • Leverage competing kinetics to accelerate hydrogenation and carrier reactions• Use data-driven approaches to establish structure-property-performance relationships

for sorbent and hydride design

Connection to system-level models• Inform system models with materials-level parameters• Use system models to focus simulations on highest-impact factors

Key future priority will connect individual materials properties to system-level understanding for highest-impact design guidelines

Page 24: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Summary: Modeling & simulation support key HyMARC missions

New foundational understanding of…• Hydrogen interactions with interfaces and composites in sorbents and metal hydrides• Nanosizing effects on metal hydrides thermodynamics and kinetics• Chemical mechanisms for bond activation in metal hydrides• Efficiency, selectivity, and durability of catalysts for key hydrogen carrier reactions

New capabilities for…• Selecting proper methods for accurate physisorption predictions in sorbents• Simulating kinetic regimes in complex metal hydrides (advanced DRINK model)• Calibrating theory-experiment thermodynamic predictions using data science • Incorporating effects of catalyst and environment chemistry in hydrogen carrier reactions

23

Page 25: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Technical backup slides

Page 26: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Modeling with “quantum volume” propertiesModeling with “bulk” properties

Metal hydrides: Confinement stress for destabilizing nano-hydrides

25

Molar volume [cm3/mol]

Bulk modulus Kbulk [GPa]

Mg 13.79 ~36

MgH2 18.43 ~53

This large compressive strain based on ideal materials properties is unrealistic

We assessed the reaction enthalpy changes of metal hydrides by “nanomechanics” modeling tool based on “quantum volume”

Mild reaction (T,pH2) conditions can be achieved by destabilizing hydrides. Compared to chemical and

electronic interactions, impact of mechanical interactions between host and hydrides is not well understood.

132 Mg atom nanoparticle

Size [nm]

Bulk modulus Knano [GPa]

Mg ~1.67 ~24.6

MgH2 ~1.74 ~34.8

Volumetric strain 𝜺V = −11%Strain energy = 3.8 kJ/mol

𝜺v = −11%

Knano = 34.8 GPaMg1.67 nm

MgH2

1.67 nm

Volumetric strain 𝜺V = −25%Strain energy = 20.0 kJ/mol

à destabilizing MgH2 by 3.8 kJ/mol H2

(vs. measured ∆Hrxn for 2 nm particles ≅ 8 kJ/mol H2)*More direct measurement of mechanical strain

is under way in collaboration with KAIST

*Cho et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1704316

Page 27: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Integration of modeling with HyMARC DataHub

26

Expt.• Experimental B K-edge XAS

spectra of MgB2 on the DataHub

Theory

• Simulate MgB2 and related solid such as B2O3

• Download the expt. spectra and overlay with simulated spectra

Theory

• Upload the overlayed spectra• Match peaks between

simulation and expt. to see if any in expt. correspond to B2O3

Expt.

• Indication of impurity or MgB2partially oxidized to B2O3

• Needs to be checked by experiments

Sample Spectra of MgB2 and B2O3

Workflow on DataHub – An Example

Page 28: HyMARC Core Activity: Computational Modeling€¦ · T* ln() /T – (D+a) * T. 2. Estimate confidence of computed data Cost function definition and minimization BOBYQA. Bound optimization

Hydrogen Materials Advanced Research Consortium

Responses to previous year reviewer’s comments

• Project was not reviewed last year in this format (reviews were by lab instead)

28