Hydrography for The Lower Rio Grande Valley A Comparison of Mapped versus Synthetic Streams
description
Transcript of Hydrography for The Lower Rio Grande Valley A Comparison of Mapped versus Synthetic Streams
Hydrography for The Lower Rio Grande Valley
A Comparison of Mapped versus Synthetic Streams
By Jean ParcherGIS in Water Resources
December 4, 2001
Purpose of Project
To use the ArcHydro Geodatabase model to compare the NHD and EDNA datasets for two watersheds in the Lower Rio Grande valley:
density of stream networks validity of flow networks ease of transferring unique attribute codes between
the two datasets for international applications ease of transferring flow statistics and
catchment basins between the datasets and to play with the Geodatabase model
Lower Rio Grande Valley Study Area
From Falcon Reservoir To Brownsville
Dendritic and anastomoticdrainage patterns in a low relief landscape
EDNA Synthetic Streams
HUCs Falcon Reservoir and Los Olmos Derived from the NED 30 meter resolution data in Texas and 100 meter DTEDs in Mexico Processed by NWS for Flash flood monitoring program Includes flow direction and flow accumulation grids, Pfafstetter codes, and vector synthetic stream network
NHD Data Sources
National Hydrography Dataset
HUCS for Falcon and Los Olmos watersheds 1:100,000-scale (river reach 3 files) 1:24,000-scale (matches streams on DOQs)
NHD 24K – revised to the 1995 DOQ
Loading the EDNA Synthetic Streams into the Geodatabase
ArcGIS hydro Load:• Need a clean network• Use the streams datafile for hydroedge• Use the NHD waterbody file (set grid size to 1)• In the schema add all fields that don’t match• join files streams_match with streams for access to reach codes
NED Derived • threshold set to match 100K NHD• 39 different files (vector and grids)• one stream per catchment basin
Falcon HUC - EDNA Streams andTopography
Shaded relief and EDNA streams, NHD waterbody (Falcon Reservoir)
NWS Flash flood catchmentBasins with EDNA streamsAnd hydro junctions
RESULTS
Pfafstetter and Reach codes
By joining together the streams andstreams_match tables, using the STREAMS_ID field, can link bothPfafstetter and Reach codes to the same feature.
RESULTS
Application of Hydro Vector tools to find EDNA problems
Red – NHDBlue - EDNA
Flow directionWith two sinks
RESULTS
Loading the NHD into the Geodatabase
ArcGIS Hydro Load:Need a clean network - use route.drain vector file instead of route.reach to create networks In the schema, add all fields that don’t match Change the grid size for Waterbodies from 1000 to 1
In ArcMap: relate route.drain to route.reach to get access to reach codes
100K and 24K NHD and EDNA Catchment Basins
100K NHD – some basinsWith no stream network
24K NHD – some basins withMultiple streams
RESULTS
Use of Hydrology Modeling Tool
to Improve Catchments for 24K
NHD
Hydro Modeling toolMinimum # of cells - 2500
EDNA catchments
RESULTS
Acknowledgements
– USGS EROS data center (EDNA data)
– TWDB Stratmap (1:24K NHD)
– UT CRWR for ArcGIS Hydro data model exercise
– UT CRWR for answering my questions
– USGS RMMC (NHD geodatabase model)
Questions?