Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

11
Eyal Neistein Dekel 60 Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635 Eyal Neistein TMoX group, MPE Garching Collaborators: Sadegh Khochfar, Claudio Dalla- Vecchia, Joop Schaye

description

Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635. Eyal Neistein TMoX group, MPE Garching Collaborators: Sadegh Khochfar , Claudio Dalla-Vecchia , Joop Schaye. Hydrodynamic simulations (HYDs). Typical questions:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Page 1: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin

arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinTMoX group, MPE Garching

Collaborators: Sadegh Khochfar, Claudio Dalla-Vecchia, Joop Schaye

Page 2: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Hydrodynamic simulations (HYDs)

• How each process affects the galaxy mass? (feedback, SF, Cooling)

• Why changing the parameters of a given process (e.g. SF) do not affect the galaxies? What is `self-regulation’?

• What is the physics missing in order to reproduce the observational results (e.g. the LF)?

• Can we extrapolate the results of one zoom simulation into a large volume easily?

• Can we easily quantify the differences between different codes/parameters?

We need a tool to post-process a HYD !

Typical questions:

Page 3: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Semi-analytic models (SAMs)

Is this description accurate? Unique?Do we need only hot & cold gas?

Is it the right tool ??

What is a SAM?• Each galaxy is described by only 3 numbers• Use the same underlying DM merger trees as in the HYD

fs – star formation fc – cooling; fd – feedbackfa - accretion

Can we use a SAM in order to interpret HYDs?

Page 4: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Project outline

1. We take a HYD that was run over a cosmological box (OWLS, Schaye+10)

2. We extract the rates of: accretion, cooling, feedback, and SF directly from the HYD

3. We save these rates as function of halo mass and redshift only

4. We run our SAM using the above recipes over the merger trees that are extracted from the HYD

HYD

Recipes:fs, fc, fd, fa

Dark matter merger trees

SAM

),( zMff

Page 5: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

The history of one galaxy

fs – star formation fc – cooling; fd – feedbackfa - accretion

We follow all the particles, and checkwhich got heated/cooled/SF/accreted

Page 6: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

How similar are the galaxies?

Galaxies are compared on an object-by-object basis:

The HYD & SAM are similar at a level of ~0.1 dex

Page 7: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Star-formation rates

The SFR includes more scatter than integrated properties (like stellar mass)

Page 8: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Efficiency values

The HYD physics is different from typical SAMs

Page 9: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Works well!!Bouche +(2010), Krumholz & Dekel (2011); Khochfar & Silk (2011); Dave+ (2011)

One-phase modelAssume that each galaxy is composedfrom ‘gas’ and ‘stars’ only:

Page 10: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

SAM based on only one galaxy?We chose 3 random galaxies from the box ( )

The SAM recipes are extracted from one galaxy only

The SAM runs over the entire volume

Works well!!

Page 11: Hydro simulations and SAMs:  two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635

Eyal NeisteinDekel 60

Happy birthday Avishai !

Summary

•HYD and SAM agree quite well, once efficiencies are matched on average

•The SAM can be very simple, even one phase model is enough

•All the recipes are summarized as a function of the host halo mass and redshift

•The evolution of one galaxy includes enough information to extract the baryonic behavior

•We have a common language for both SAMs & HYDs