Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635
-
Upload
robin-mitchell -
Category
Documents
-
view
14 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin arXiv:1109.4635
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Hydro simulations and SAMs: two sides of the same coin
arXiv:1109.4635
Eyal NeisteinTMoX group, MPE Garching
Collaborators: Sadegh Khochfar, Claudio Dalla-Vecchia, Joop Schaye
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Hydrodynamic simulations (HYDs)
• How each process affects the galaxy mass? (feedback, SF, Cooling)
• Why changing the parameters of a given process (e.g. SF) do not affect the galaxies? What is `self-regulation’?
• What is the physics missing in order to reproduce the observational results (e.g. the LF)?
• Can we extrapolate the results of one zoom simulation into a large volume easily?
• Can we easily quantify the differences between different codes/parameters?
We need a tool to post-process a HYD !
Typical questions:
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Semi-analytic models (SAMs)
Is this description accurate? Unique?Do we need only hot & cold gas?
Is it the right tool ??
What is a SAM?• Each galaxy is described by only 3 numbers• Use the same underlying DM merger trees as in the HYD
fs – star formation fc – cooling; fd – feedbackfa - accretion
Can we use a SAM in order to interpret HYDs?
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Project outline
1. We take a HYD that was run over a cosmological box (OWLS, Schaye+10)
2. We extract the rates of: accretion, cooling, feedback, and SF directly from the HYD
3. We save these rates as function of halo mass and redshift only
4. We run our SAM using the above recipes over the merger trees that are extracted from the HYD
HYD
Recipes:fs, fc, fd, fa
Dark matter merger trees
SAM
),( zMff
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
The history of one galaxy
fs – star formation fc – cooling; fd – feedbackfa - accretion
We follow all the particles, and checkwhich got heated/cooled/SF/accreted
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
How similar are the galaxies?
Galaxies are compared on an object-by-object basis:
The HYD & SAM are similar at a level of ~0.1 dex
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Star-formation rates
The SFR includes more scatter than integrated properties (like stellar mass)
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Efficiency values
The HYD physics is different from typical SAMs
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Works well!!Bouche +(2010), Krumholz & Dekel (2011); Khochfar & Silk (2011); Dave+ (2011)
One-phase modelAssume that each galaxy is composedfrom ‘gas’ and ‘stars’ only:
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
SAM based on only one galaxy?We chose 3 random galaxies from the box ( )
The SAM recipes are extracted from one galaxy only
The SAM runs over the entire volume
Works well!!
Eyal NeisteinDekel 60
Happy birthday Avishai !
Summary
•HYD and SAM agree quite well, once efficiencies are matched on average
•The SAM can be very simple, even one phase model is enough
•All the recipes are summarized as a function of the host halo mass and redshift
•The evolution of one galaxy includes enough information to extract the baryonic behavior
•We have a common language for both SAMs & HYDs