Hydraulic Resistance

61
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 1 HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE Local (Minor!) Pressure Losses

Transcript of Hydraulic Resistance

Page 1: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 1

HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE

Local (Minor!) Pressure Losses

Page 2: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 2

Local Pressure Losses(Minor Losses!)

q Although they often account for a major portion of the total pressure loss, the additional losses due to entries and exits, fittings and valves are traditionally referred to as minor losses!

q These losses represent additional energy dissipation in the flow, usually caused by secondary flows induced by curvature or recirculation.

q The minor losses are any total pressure loss present in addition to the total pressure loss for the same length of straight pipe.

Page 3: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 3

Modified Bernoulli Equation

q Bernoulli equation is valid along any streamline in any frictionless flow§ However, this is very restrictive.

§ Solid walls introduce friction effects.

§ Fittings in a piping system as well as cross sectional area changes introduce frictional pressure losses.

q Bernoulli’s equation can be modified to include these frictional losses present in any fluid system network

222

1222

12

2221

211 2

121 vKv

DfL

h

ghvpghvp ρρρρρρ ∑++++=++

Wall Friction

Local Losses

K is the coefficient of flow (hydraulic) resistance

Page 4: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 4

Coefficient of Flow Resistance - KA Dimensionless Parameter

Energy) (Kinetic Pressure DynamicLoss Pressure Total

Resistance Flow =

q Coefficient of flow resistance is defined as the ratio of the total energy lost over the given segment to the kinetic energy in the section§ Ratio of the total pressure lost over the segment to the dynamic

pressure in the segment

q Flow resistance coefficient K, for the case of uniform distribution of static pressure and density over the segment but which are variable along the flow

22

1o

total

vp

∆=

Page 5: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 5

Base Area for Flow Resistance

q Flow resistance coefficients can be expressed in terms of the upstream or downstream velocity of the component§ Loss term can be added to upstream or downstream velocity with the

same net effect

2

2

2

2

2

22

122

1

×=

==

×=×

up

downdownup

up

down

up

down

down

up

downdownupup

AA

KK

AA

vv

K

K

vKvK ρρ

q Base area for all flow resistances (K) shown in this section are given based on the smallest cross sectional area of the componenthence the largest velocity.

22

1basev

pK

ρ∆

=

2212

21

2212

21

221

221

)(

)(

downdownupuph

upup

downdownh

downdownupup

vpvp

vpvp

vKDfL

vKDfL

ρρ

ρρ

ρ

ρ

+=++

+=+

+

++

Page 6: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 6

Equivalent Length of Fittings

q Local (minor) losses can be represented in a different way using the the concept of equivalent length§ Inclusion of local losses in Bernoulli equation can make the iterative

type problems labor intensive

§ Local losses can be significantly higher for relatively short piping systems and may not be ignored

232

1

232

1232

1

)(

)(

32

321

312

121

1

32

321

312

121

1

VKDfL

VKVDfL

h

h

ghVpghVp

ghVpghVp

ρ

ρρ

ρρρρ

ρρρρ

++

++

++=++

++=++

h

eq

D

fLK∑ =

Page 7: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 7

Equivalent Length of Fittings

q Concept of equivalent length allows us to replace the local (minor) loss term with equivalent pipe length

fKD

LD

fLK h

eqh

eq )(Σ=⇒=Σ

§ f is the friction factor that applies to the entire pipe

§ D is the pipe hydraulic diameter (characteristic length)

§ Leq is the equivalent length: Length of pipe which can replace the fitting (local loss) to obtain the same pressure loss

Page 8: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 8

List of Configurations

q Sudden Expansion

q Sudden Expansion in One Plane

q Sudden Contraction

§ Vena Contracta Effect

q Bend

q Conical Expansion

q Conical Contraction

q Uniformly Distributed Barriers§ Wire Screen

§ Threaded Screen

§ Two Plane Screen

q Gratings in Line With Flow

q Orifice In a Straight Tube§ Sharp Edge

§ Rounded

§ Beveled

§ Thick Edge

q Orifice In a Tube Transition§ Sharp Edge

§ Rounded

§ Beveled

§ Thick Edge

Page 9: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 9

Resistance to FlowSudden Changes in

Flow Area

Sudden ExpansionSudden Contraction

Vena Contracta Effect

Page 10: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 10

Sudden Expansion Pressure Losses

q An abrupt expansion of a tube cross-sectional area gives rise to so-called shock losses.

q The local pressure loss due to this “shock” depends only on the cross sectional area ratio A1/A2.

2

2

1exp )1(

AA

K −=

§ The area ratio of A1/A2 is less than 1.0

q Assumptions:§ Uniform velocity distribution at

cross section A1

§ Reynolds number > 104

A1 A2Vortices

JetP1 P2

P1P2

Jet

A2A1

L2

Base area is A1

8-12 Dh

Page 11: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 11

Sudden Expansion Pressure Losses

q The jet formed due to sudden expansion, § is separated from the remaining medium

§ Forms a significant turbulence as shown by the vortices near thewall surfaces.

q It requires a pipe length (L2) of 8-12 hydraulic diameters (Dh) before relatively uniform flow of velocity v2 is established.

Page 12: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 12

Sudden Expansion in One Plane

q When an abrupt expansion of the tube cross section occurs only in one plane (as shown in the Figure) the shock losses decrease with an increase in the aspect ratio B/H.§ B is the width of larger cross section

§ H is the constant height of the channel

q Loss coefficient is:

2

2

11exp )1(

AA

kK −=

q Where k1 =< 1 is correction factor which depends on the aspect ratio B/H.

Dependence of k1 on B/H

Page 13: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 13

A1

A1

A3

Ac

Sudden Contraction

q When the cross section abruptly contracts the phenomenon is basically a similar to that observed when shock losses occur during abrupt expansion

q Contraction losses occur when the jet

§ Is further compressed after entering the section A3 - vena contracta effect

§ Effective flow diameter reduces to Ac

§ Expands until it fills the entire section of the narrow channel A3

Vena Contracta

Ac A3

75.0

1

315.0

−=

AA

KContBase area is A3

Page 14: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 14

Vena Contracta Effect

q Flow passage through the contraction is accompanied by distortion of the trajectories of particles with the result that they continue their motion by inertia toward the axis of the opening.

q This reduces the initial area of the jet cross section at C-C until the area is smaller than the area of the cross section of the opening. Plane of vena contracta.

C-C’Plane of

Vena Contracta

q Starting mid-section CC, the trajectory of moving particles are straightened.

q Thereafter an abrupt jet expansion takes place.

Page 15: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 15

Tube Walls Following Flow Streamlines

q The pressure loss of a contracting cross section can be significantly reduced with a tube boundary following the flow streamlines.§ Allowing a smooth transition

from a wide section to the narrow one

§ With the curvilinear boundaries

§ Converging and diverging (expanding) nozzle

Pipe Wall

Converging Nozzle

Diverging Nozzle

Page 16: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 16

Resistance to FlowChanges of the Stream Direction

Flow Losses in an ElbowFlanged Elbow

Standard Threaded ElbowMiter Bend

Page 17: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 17

Change of Flow Direction

q In elbows the streamlines are curved and centrifugal force causes a pressure increase near the outer wall of the elbow.

q Starting at point A pressure increases and rising to a maximum value at B.

q In region AB the fluid flow is opposed by an adverse pressure gradient.

q At the inside of the elbow, the pressure decreases to point C and then rises again in the exit section D.

q For this reason an adverse pressure gradient also exists from C to D at the inside wall.

q These conditions may lead to a separation and turbulence and corresponding losses in flow energy.

q The magnitude of these losses to a large extend depend on the sharpness of the curvature.

A

B

C

D

Higher pressure region

Lower pressure region

Page 18: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 18

Flow Losses In an Elbow

q The main portion of flow pressure losses in curved tubes is due to formation of eddies at the inner wall.

q Other conditions being equal, the curved tube offers the largest resistance in the case when the curvature at the inner wall is asharp corner.

q Rounding of the elbow corners makes the flow separation much smoother and consequently lowers the resistance.

§ A big majority of flow the flow losses can be recovered by rounding the inner corner and leaving the outer elbow sharp.

• Cross sectional area at the place of bending increases sharply (As shown in red x-section)

• Rounding the outer elbow corner and keeping the inner corner sharp does not reduce the elbow resistance.

• Large radius on the outer elbow will even increase flow losses since it would reduce the cross sectional area significantly (As shown in green x-sec)

Page 19: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 19

Minimizing Elbow Resistance

q The minimum resistance is achieved by an elbow when outer & inner radii is related as

ro

r1

Ro

do

6.01 +=o

o

o dr

dr

q The resistance of right angle elbows can greatly be reduced by installing a fairing on the inner corner§ An optimum fairing with a ratio of ro/do = 0.45

reduces the pressure losses by approx 50%§ An additional fairing on the outer corner with a

ratio of r1/do = 0.45 reduces the losses by an additional 5%.

q Reduction in the elbow resistance can also be attained by beveling sharp corners of the bend especially the inner corner

ro

r1

do

Page 20: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 20

Minimizing Elbow ResistanceExample of a Coolant Return Elbow

q Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was used to minimize the flow losses in a coolant return elbow.

q Fairing on the inner corner together with a smooth outer radius reduced the flow losses significantly.

Base Case

Design A

Design B

Page 21: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 21

Minimizing Elbow ResistanceExample of a Coolant Return Elbow

77% reduction in pressure losses is significant!

Base Case

Design A

Design B

Flow Separation %)27(6.4 kPap =∆

%)100(5.16 kPap =∆

%)23(9.3 kPap =∆

Fairly small effective flow area

Fairing

Larger Inlet cross sectional area

Streamlines outside corner radius

Higher velocity on inside cornerbefore 90 degree flow turn

Higher velocity on outside cornerafter 90 degree flow turn

CFD results shown in terms of velocity

vectors and velocity color contours

Page 22: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 22

Flow Resistance of ElbowsCrane 1988, A-29

q Resistance (K) of 90 degree smooth, flanged elbow

ro

r1

Ro

do

q ft is the turbulent friction factor given in the Table above

q Resistance (K) of standard threaded elbowè K=30Ft

Ro/do K/Ft do (mm) Ft

1 20 12.5 0.0271.5 14 19 0.0252 12 25 0.233 12 32 0.224 14 38 0.0216 17 50 0.0198 24 75 0.018

10 30 100 0.01712 34 125 0.01614 38 150 0.01516 42 250 0.01420 50 400 0.013

600 0.012

Flanged Elbow

Standard Threaded Elbow

Page 23: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 23

Flow Resistance of Miter Bend

q Resistance of 90 degree Miter Bendè K=60Ft

q Resistance of Non-90 degreemiter bend do

90o Miter Bend

Angle K/Ft0 2

15 430 845 1560 2575 4090 60

Miter Angle

Non-90o

Miter Bend

Page 24: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 24

Resistance to FlowSmooth Change in

Velocity & Flow Area

Diffuser with Gradual ExpansionPressure Looses in a Diffuser

Effect of Diffuser Angle on Pressure LoosesConical Expansion & ContractionConverging Rectilinear Nozzle

Page 25: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 25

Diffuser - Gradual Expansion

q A gradual tapered transition from one diameter to another can reduce flow losses appreciably in comparison with abrupt transitions.

q In a conical diffuser the pressure rises in the direction of flow

§ Increasing diameter reduces the velocity.

q Kinetic energy at cross section A1 is converted to potential energy at cross section A2

q However the slower fluid particles near the diffuser wall tend to stagnate and disturb the theoretical (ideal) pressure rise. Thiscauses an energy loss.

§ Total energy at section A2 is less than the total energy at section A1

A1

A2

P1P2

Jet

A2

A1

α

P1 < P2

Higher velocity, kinetic energy

Higher static pressure, potential energy

Base area is A1

Page 26: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 26

Pressure Losses in a Diffuser

q The resistance coefficients of the diffusers as well as the flow structure in them and the separation phenomenon depend on many parameters such as§ Divergence angle, alpha

§ Area ratio

§ The shape of the velocity profile at the entrance

§ Degree of flow turbulence at the entrance

§ Flow regime, at the entrance

§ Flow compressibility

q The effect of the Reynolds number on the resistance coefficients of the diffusers is different for different divergence angles

Page 27: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 27

Effect of Divergence AngleIn Gradual Expansion - Diffuser

q The total resistance coefficient of a diffuser expressed in terms of the velocity at small section becomes smaller up to certain limits of divergence angle, alpha.§ Increase in the cross sectional area of the diffuser causes a drop in

average velocity.

§ Static pressure gain due to this cross sectional area change is greater than the pressure loss due to flow turbulence up to certain limits of divergence angle, alpha

q If the cone angle is too large, separation of the flow from the wall also occurs and causes an additional energy loss.

q The most advantages cone angle is 8o degrees q In flow channels of rectangular cross section, separation occurs if

cone angle alpha is greater than 10o

Page 28: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 28

Conical Expansion & Contraction

451

4512

sin6.2

2

2

1

2

2

1

>⇒

−=

<⇒

=

α

αα

AA

K

AA

K

ExpConical

ExpConical

4512

sin5.0

4512

sin8.0

2

1

2

1

>⇒

=

<⇒

=

αα

αα

AA

K

AA

K

nContractioConical

nContractioConical

A1

A2

P1P2

Jet

A2

A1

α

P1 < P2

Higher velocity, kinetic energy

Higher static pressure, potential energyq Expansion

q Contraction

Expansion

α 2A1A

Rectilinear Converging Nozzle

Base area is A1

Page 29: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 29

Gradual ContractionConverging Nozzle

q In a convergent section flow losses are small since the pressure gradient is in the same direction as the flow.

q Particles of fluid near the wall are continually accelerated by this pressure gradient so that flow is maintained even in the close vicinity of the wall.

q The resistance coefficient of a converging nozzle with rectilinear boundaries at high Re numbers depends on:§ Convergence angle alpha

§ Area ratio no=A2/A1<1α 2A

1A

Rectilinear Converging Nozzle

Page 30: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 30

Flow Resistance of Converging Rectilinear Nozzle

q At sufficiently large angles (alpha > 10o) and area ratios less than 0.3, the flow after passing from the contracting section of the rectilinear converging nozzle to the straight part of the tube separates from the walls which is the main source of the flow losses.§ The larger the alpha and smaller the area ratio, stronger is the flow

separation and greater the pressure losses

§ Pressure losses are at maximum for the limiting case of 180 degree angle sudden contraction.

)102(

)00745.0044.000723.0022.00125.0(23

020

30

40

απαα +−×

−+−+−=− nnnnK NozzleConv

§ where alpha is in radians • è 1 degree = (pi/180) = 0.01745 radians

Page 31: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 31

Resistance to Flow at the Exit From Tubes

Uniform Velocity Distribution At Tube ExitExponential Velocity DistributionSinusoidal Velocity Distribution

Asymmetric Velocity Distribution

Page 32: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 32

Resistance of Exit Sections

q In the case of free discharge of the flow from a straight section of the tube of constant cross section into a large volume, the total losses are reduced only to the losses of the velocity pressure at the exit.

Nv

pK velocity =

∆= 2

21 ρ

q The coefficient N depends on the nature of the velocity distribution at the exit.§ In the case of uniform exit velocity distribution, it is equal to unity

§ In the remaining cases where velocity distribution is non-uniform, it always larger than one.

• Exponential, Parabolic, Sinusoidal, Asymmetric cases are some of the non-uniform velocity distributions.

q When fluid flow leaves the piping system, the kinetic energy of the discharged jet is always lost.

Page 33: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 33

Free Discharge From a Straight TubeAt Different Velocity Distributions

122

1=

∆=

owp

Uniform Velocity Distribution

)3)(32(4)1()12(

4

33

22

1 ++++

=∆

=mmm

mmwp

Koρ

Exponential Velocity Distribution

Page 34: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 34

Free Discharge From a Straight TubeAt Different Velocity Distributions

Sinusoidal Velocity Distribution in a plane tube

2

1

∆+=

oww

K

)9.32.0sin(164585.0oo by

ww

++=

67.3=K

Asymmetrical Velocity Distribution in a plane tube

Page 35: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 35

Resistance to Flow withSudden Change in Velocity

Orifice PlateOrifice in A Straight Tube

Orifice with Beveled Inlet EdgeOrifice with Rounded Inlet Edge

Page 36: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 36

Orifice Plate

q Flow passage through the opening is accompanied by the distortion of the trajectoriesof particles with the result that they continue their motion by inertia toward the axis of the opening.

q This reduces the initial area jet cross sectional area by a factor alpha. (Vena contracta effect)

q Thickening, beveling and rounding the orifice edges reduces the effect of jet contraction (reduced jet velocity downstream of orifice plate) and reduce pressure losses.

Page 37: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 37

Orifice In A Straight TubeSharp, Rounded & Beveled Edges

Idelchik Pg 222-224

2

1

2375.0

11

1707.01

−+

−=−

o

ooOrificeSharp A

AAA

AA

K

275.0

11

11

−′+

−=− A

AAA

K ooOrificeRounded ζ

ohDr

7.7

1047.003.0−

×+=′ζ

2375.0

11

11

−′+

−=− A

AAA

K ooOrificeBeveled ζ

+−×+=′

3.2

4.884.31034.013.0 ohoh D

lD

l

ζ Base area is AoFlow Thru Orifice

Page 38: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 38

Orifice In A Straight TubeThick Edge Orifice

Idelchik Pg 22-224

( )

++

×−=8

8

05.0535.0

25.0

104.2 ll

+

−+

−+

−=−

h

oooEdgeThick D

flAA

AA

AA

K2

1

375.1

1

75.0

1

1115.0 τ

Base area is AoFlow Thru Orifice

Page 39: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 39

Resistance to Flow ThroughBarriers Uniformly Distributed

Over the Tube Cross SectionCircular Metal WireThreaded ScreensTwo Plane Screens

Grating In Line with FlowGratings with an Angle of Attack

Page 40: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 40

Uniformly Distributed Barriers

q Barriers that are distributed uniformly over the tube or duct cross sections create a uniform flow resistance.

q Types of barriers may include:§ Perforated sheets (grids), screens, beds, fabrics, loose material,

crosswise bundles of tubes, etc.

q The flow resistance coefficient of a uniformly distributed barrier depends on:§ Shape of the barrier

§ Free area coefficient

§ Reynolds number

q Free area coefficient is defined as the percent clear area of the barrier with respect to the upstream pipe area.

q Idelchik pg522

1AA

A

AA o

upstreampipe

openfree ==

Page 41: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 41

Circular Metal Wire ScreensIdelchik Diagram 8.6 Pg 522

2

0

1

1

0 )1()1(3.1 −+−=− AA

AA

K ScreenWire

310Re ≥=µδmov

310Re50 << 2

0

1

1

01 )1()1(3.1 −+−=− A

AAA

kK ScreenWire

50Re < 2

0

1

1

0 )1()1(3.1Re22

−+−+=− AA

AA

K ScreenWire

area flow upstream pipe is A

screenon areaopen is

1

oA

Base area is Ao

Page 42: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 42

Two Plane & Silk Thread ScreenIdelchik Pg 523

q Two plane screen made from bars of circular cross section

2

1

12

128.1

=−

AA

AA

Ko

o

ScreenPlane

Base area is Ao

ScreenWireThreadsSilk KK −− = 62.1

500Re >

q Silk Thread Screen

Page 43: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 43

Gratings – In Line with FlowIdelchik Pg 526

q Special case of

θβ sin11kKGrating =

5.0Sa

and 51

o >=mdl

0.740.30.370.430.760.761Beta2

1.730.710.8711.771.772.34Beta1

7654321Shape

§ ao is flow space between gratings

§ S1 is pitch of gratings

§ l is length of gratings

§ dm is width of gratings

§ Beta1 is grating shape constant

§ Theta is angle of bar inclination with respect to flow

34

11 1

−=

oaS

k

Base area is AoFlow Between

Gratings

Page 44: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 44

Gratings – In Line with FlowIdelchik Pg 526

q Case of1

o

Sa

and arbitrary mdl

θβ sin2 GridThickGrating KK −=

2

1

2

1

375.1

1

75.0

1

/1115.0

+

−+

−+

−=− A

A

dl

fA

A

A

A

A

AK open

h

openopenopenGritThick τ

7

8

05.0535.025.0

4.2ll

hdl +

+

−=τ

q Flow losses of grids made of bar gratings with different cross sectional shapes consist:§ Entrance loss § Frictional loss over the bars§ Sudden expansion (shock) losses at the exit

Page 45: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 45

Gratings with an Angle of Attack

q Reynolds number > 104 & a0/S1>0.5

21σσ=GratingK

Page 46: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 46

HYDRAULIC RESISTANCEOF NETWORKS

Page 47: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 47

Hydraulic Resistance of Networks

q In flow networks, the portion of the total pressure which is spent in overcoming the forces of hydraulic resistance is irreversibly lost.§ The molecular and turbulent viscosity of the moving medium

irreversibly converts the mechanical work of the resistance forces into heat.

q There are two types of total pressure losses (hydraulic resistance) in flow network (pipeline system)§ Pressure losses resulting from friction (frictional drag)

§ Local pressure losses

Page 48: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 48

Friction Pressure Losses

q Fluid friction loss is due to the viscosity (both molecular and turbulent) of fluids in motion

q Results from momentum transfer between the molecules and individual particles of adjacent fluid layers moving in different velocities§ molecules in laminar flow

§ individual particles in turbulent flow

Page 49: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 49

Local Pressure Losses

q The local losses of total pressure are caused by§ Local disturbance of the flow

§ Separation of flow from walls

§ Formation of vortices and strong turbulent agitation• Entrance of a fluid into the pipeline• Expansion, contraction, bending and branching of flow• Flow through orifices, grids, valves• Friction through porous media (filtration)• Discharge of fluid into atmosphere or another reservoir

q All of these phenomena contribute to the exchange of momentum between the moving fluid particles§ Enhancing energy dissipation

§ Increasing total pressure loss

Page 50: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 50

Total Pressure LossFriction + Local Pressure Loss

q The total pressure losses in any complex fluids network are inseparable. However, for ease of calculation they are arbitrarily subdivided in each element of the pipeline (network)§ Into frictional losses

§ Into local losses

q Total pressure loss for the fluid network is the summation of pressure drops in each segment

)(1

localfriction

segmentsall

total ppp ∆+∆=∆ ∑−

q The value of friction loss (relative to local pressure loss) is usually taken into account for§ Long branch pipes, diffusers with small divergence angles

§ Long fittings

Page 51: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 51

Units of Pressure Loss

q Head is energy per unit weight of fluid.§ Force x Length / Weight

Page 52: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 52

References

q Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance 3rd EditionI. E. Idelchik, CRC Begell House - 1994

q Fluid MechanicsDr. Walther Kaufmann, Mc Graw Hill – 1958

q Crane Co., Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe, Technical Paper No. 410, Crane Co., Joliet, IL, 1988.

Page 53: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 53

Appendix

Page 54: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 54

Appendix

Page 55: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 55

q The total resistance coefficient of a diffuser installed in a flow network under any inlet condition can be expressed as

=− 1

2

1

2

AA

K ExpGrad η 0.20.15? where

−=

00 00 =−>− = LDiffuserdLDiffuser kK ζ

Total Resistance Coefficient of a Diffuser

with straight section installed upstream

Total Resistance Coefficient of a Diffuser

L0/D0=0

Page 56: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 56

Sudden Change in VelocityIdelchik Pg 217 Diagram 4-9

Page 57: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 57

Velocity Distribution for a Curved Bend

q Increase of the pressure at the outer wall and decrease at the inner wall will create a flow velocity the lower at the altar wall and larger at the narrow

AB

C D

q Before the straight section after the turn: Flow velocity will be lower at the outer wall and larger at the inner wall.§ Due to higher pressure at the outer wall & lower pressure inside.

q Downstream of turn - Straight section: Higher flow at the outer wall and lower velocity at the inner wall.

q Secondary Flows:

Higher pressure

lower velocity

Lower pressure higher

velocity

EDDY ZONES:Flow separates

both at the inner and outer walls

Page 58: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 58

Derivation of Local Loss Coefficient Sudden Expansion

q From the momentum law:

q From Modified Bernoulli Eq.:

)()()()(

)()(

12221

1222221

12221

vvvppvvvAApp

vvQAppvmFext

−=−−=−

−=−∆=Σ

ρρ

ρ

&

212

1exp

22

212

112 )()( vKvvpp ρρ +−=−

2

2

1

2

2

1exp

2

1

221

212

2112

22

22

2112

22

21exp

222

1212

112

22

212

1exp

)1(

)1(

)1(

)(

2

22

)(

AA

AA

K

vv

v

vv

vvvv

vvvvvvK

vvvvvvK

−=

−−=

−−=

−−=

−+−=

+−+−=

+−+−=

q Eliminating (p2-p1) & rho212

1exp

22

212

1122 )()( vKvvvvv +−=−−

q Local Loss Coefficient, Kexp

§ Ratio A1/A2 is less than 1.0

Page 59: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 59

Flow From A Vessel With Spoutq Momentum Equation Between sections e & a:

§ Forces acting on the fluid must equal to the difference in momenta between fluid leaving and entering the section per unit time

Sharp Edged Spout

Contracting Jet

Slow Expansion Until Filling the Spout

Stagnant Flow Region

Large Vessel

Spout

( ) )( eoe vvAvApp −=− ρq Applying Bernoulli’s equation at sections e & a

§ Pressure at e is pe including the stagnant flow region

( ) ( ) ncontractioeoe Kvvpp +−=− 22

21 ρ

q Combining both equations

Page 60: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 60

Orifice with Beveled Inlet EdgeIn A Tube Transition Section Idelchik Pg 224

Page 61: Hydraulic Resistance

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 61

Orifice with Rounded Inlet EdgeIn A Tube Transition Section Idelchik Pg 224