Hyderabad - AMDA · PDF file5 . Hyderabad in National Scenario- Comparison with Benchmark...
Transcript of Hyderabad - AMDA · PDF file5 . Hyderabad in National Scenario- Comparison with Benchmark...
1
City Development Plan
Hyderabad
Jaw
ahar
lal
Neh
ru
Nat
iona
l Urb
an R
enew
al M
issi
on
2
Urbanisation
Urban areas contribute 75% of GDP and more than
50% of our population to live in urban areas in few decades.
Role of National and State policies in targeting balanced development- but limitations to the success of such efforts.
Focused approach coupled with heavy investment in urban infrastructure needed.
Cities would be the key drivers to our economy but
Urban areas do not have 100000 problems but 100 problems multiplied 1000 times
3
Presentation Covers 1. City Development Plan (CDP)
2. Salient features of CDP : Hyderabad Current scenario and gaps
Underpinning Challenges
Vision
Strategy
Financing
Action Plan
4
5
Hyderabad in National Scenario- Comparison with Benchmark Cities
Hyderabad lags benchmark Indian cities on economic, infrastructure and social indicators. Hyderabad Bangalore Mumbai Delhi Chennai Kolkata
Gross District Product Per Capita Rs. 23000 Rs. 33000 Rs. 43000 Rs. 39000 Rs. 34,000Rs. 33,000Population below poverty line ( 2001) 23% 33% NA 8% 20% 6%Economic Disparity ( % of low and lower middle Income households, 2002) 37% 42% 27% 18% 42% 32%Literacy Rate( 2001) 79% 87% 87% 83% 80% 81%Drop out rate ( 2001) 66% 70% 42% 52% 46% 42%
Housing% of population living in slums ( 2001) 37% 18% 55% 35% 40% 31%
Health Child Mortality Rate (2001) 6.90% 4.90% NA 2.60% 3.70% 1.60%Piped water supply per day ( Hours)
2 hrs alternate day 2 to 4 NA 2 1 NA
Per capita Availability inlpcd of potable water (Water utility coverage area,2003)
130 80-100 168 180 106 173
SanitationSewerage Connections (UA)
41% 21% NA 55% 55% NAPublic Transport Utilization rate 44% 36% NA 62% 36% NA% area covered by roads 6% 12% 10% 18% 10% 12%Vehicles Density ( passenger car units per KM of road length) 723 695 242 NA 293 NARoad Accident Fatality Rate
( per 100,000 pop.) 2001
1200 1160 730 1430 100 350
Education
Water
Economic
Transport
Strong Weak
Low GDP-
Potential for increasing GDP.
Low literacy level.
Trailing in Water supply, Sanitation, transportation etc.
6
Hyderabad in Inter-National Scenario- Comparison with Benchmark Cities
Hyderabad Hanoi Bangkok Jakarta JohannesburgPer capita income (USD) 511 3,510 15,053 7,2,69 2,900Population below poverty line ( 2001) 23% 1.80% NA NA 25%Unemployment Rate (%) (1998) 22% 10.30% 2.20% 16.80% 26.40%
Education Literacy Rate( 2001) 79% 92% 97% 98% 93%Health Child Mortality Rate 6.90% 4.20% 3.30% 2.40% 5.50%
Household access to water 81% 100% NA 91% 84.50%
Per capita Availability in lpcd of potable water ( Water utility coverage area, 2003)
130 NA NA 77 261Household water connections ( 2001) 64% 70% 99% 50.30% 50%
SanitationSewerage Connections (UA) 41% 50% 100% 64.80% 84%
Economic Outcomes
Water
The comparison is even more harsh with respect to other metropolitan cities in developing countries.
Strong Weak
Low GDP- Potential for increase in GDP.
Low literacy level.
High poverty level.
High child mortality rate.
Trailing in Water supply, Sanitation, transportation etc.
Source: Monitor Group Report
7
Component Area
(sq km)
Population
(lakhs)
Density
(p/sq.km)
1981 1991 2001 2001
MCH 172 21.0 30.5 36.3 21048
Surrounding municipalities
419 3.8 9.9 17 4102
Others 187 2.3 3.2 4 2147
HUA 778 27.1 43.6 57.5 7393
HUDA 1905 29.9 46.7 63.8 3351
Demographics
8
Hyderabad Population has grown rapidly and is amongst the most densely populated cities
People (in 000) per Sq. KM
41.5%
31.8%
29.5%
19.9%
18.5%
51.9%36.2%
30.3%
9.8%
4.1%
20.0%
19.3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Delhi
Bglore.
Hyd.
Mumbai
Kolk.
Chen.
UA
MunicipalCorporation
Decadal Population Growth in Major Urban Agglomeration (1991-2001)
27
24
21
19
16
11
0 10 20 30 40
Mumbai
Delhi
Hyderabad
Blore
Kolkata
Chennai
Population Density of Major Corporations (2001) 000
Source: Census of India (1991 and 2001)
%
Demographics
9
88%
81%
80%
72%
65%
63%
63%
56%
52%
21%
19%
13%
10%
103%
0% 50% 100% 150% 200%
Uppalk. M
Rajen. Ngr M
Qutbul. M
Malkaj. M
L.B.Ngr M
Alwal M
Kapra M
Seriling. M
Kukat. M
Gaddin. M
Sec. Cntt
MCH
Ramach.-CT
Os. Univ
Most of the growth has taken place away from the city core
158%
26%
42%
19%
72%
19%
0%
40%
80%
120%
160%
200%
MCH
10 M
unici
paliti
es
Secb
ad C
ant
1981-1991
1991-2001
Decadal Growth of Population in Various Constituents (1991-2001)
Note: CT refers to Census Town, M refers to Municipality Source: Census of India (1991 and 2001)
Decadal Population Growth Rates in Various Constituents of HUDA (1981-01)
%
%
All
Municipalities
have grown by
more than
50%
compared to
~20% for MCH
and Sec.Cantt
All
Municipalities
have grown by
more than
50%
compared to
~20% for MCH
and Sec.Cantt
Demographics
10
Indu
stria
l
Res
iden
tial
Com
mer
cial
Che
aper
Rea
l Es
tate
Prox
imity
to
Empl
oym
ent
Infr
astr
uctu
re
Uppalk. M 1 1 1Rajen. Ngr M 1 1Qutbul. M 1 1 1Malkaj. M 1 1 1L.B.Ngr M 1 1Alwal M 1 1Kapra M 1 1Seriling. M 1 1Kukat. M 1 1Gaddin. M 1 1MCH 1 1 1 1Ramach.-CT 1 1
Nature of growth Growth DriversIn
crea
sing
Gro
wth
Rat
e
Growth has been residential creating demand for service delivery infrastructure in 10 Municipalities
Proximity to MCH is the key reason for growth Implying large % of traffic flows are towards MCH
Demographics
11
Population Density
Units- Persons/Sq. Km
1218
3706
6753
4156
13691
3273
21046 25293
6976
4142 3129
Pressure on Core is high
12
Demographics (Projections)
Component Area (sq km)
2001 2011 2021 Population (in lakhs)
Density (p/sq.km)
Population (in lakhs)
Density (p/sq.km)
Population (in lakhs)
Density (p/sq.km)
MCH 172 36.3 21048 43.3 25116 51.7 29977
Surrounding municipalities
419 17 4102 28.9 6926 50.9 12151
Others 187 4 2147 5 2692 6.3 3391
HUA 778 57.5 7393 77.2 9923 108.9 13997
HUDA 1905 63.8 3351 90.5 4753 136.4 7162
Growth will be concentrated in HUA area
13
15
Economics
Source: NCAER India Market Demographic Report 2002, State directorates of economics and statistics
39
33
23
43
33
0 20 40 60
Mumbai
Delhi
Kolkata
Bangalore
Hyderabad
Gross District Product Per Capita (2000-01)
Rs. 000
1
Hyderabad does not compare favorably with other metros, in terms of average gross district product per capita or proportion of low income households
16
Growth Corridors
Rail Network
HUA
Shamshabad Airport
FAB City
Apparel Park
Bio-tech Park
Hi-tech city
Hardware Park
Industrial and IT Estates
National highway
State highway
Growth areas Areas of Economic Growth
17
Economics
Knowledge and service sector
IT, Bio-tech, FAB city
Manufacturing
Apparel park
Garments and leather
Tourism
International Airport
18 1 0 1 3 5 10KM
SCALE 1:250000
GROWTH BY 2001GROWTH BY 2011GROWTH BY 2021
UPTO 75 LACUPTO 25 LACUPTO 10 LACUPTO 5 LAC
NODES
1 0 1 3 5 10KM
SCALE 1:250000
QUTBULLAPURRAMCHANDRAPURAM
UPPARPALLY
PATANCHERU
KHARMANGHAT
FALAKNUMA PALACE
SURARAMGUNLA POCHAMPALLY
KUKATPALLY, APHBSECUNDRABAD
CYBERABAD
GUNLA
MEDCHAL
KUSHAIGUDA
GHATKESAR
L.B.NAGAR
HABSHIGUDA
SHAMSABAD
HYDERABAD
To Mumbai N.h.no -9
To Mumbai (Broad Guage)
OSMAN SAGAR
HIMAYAT SAGAR
To Bangalore N.h.no-7
HUSSAIN SAGAR
To Nagpur N.h.-7
To Manmad
To Narsapur
To Kazipet
To Vijaywada N.h.no -9
To Nagarjuna Sagar
To Vikharabad
VASTU SHILPA CO NSULTANTS
"SANGATH" THALTEJ ROAD AHMEDABAD-380054 PHONE 7454537-39 FAX 079-7452006
CYBERABAD ENCLAVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
HUDA : ENVISAGED SPATIAL GRO WTH BY 2021- ALTERNATIVE 1 ( CO NCENTRIC MO DEL)
LEGEND
DEVELOPMENT AREA
ROADS PROPOSED IN 1980 MASTER PLANROADS PROPOSED IN 1980 MASTER PLANNATIONAL HIGHWAYS
BROAD GAUGE RA