Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.
-
Upload
delilah-wilcox -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.
![Page 1: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas
Philosophy 157
©2002, G. J. Mattey
![Page 2: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Empiricism
• All substantive human knowledge is based on the input of the senses
• Reason by itself discovers only non-substantive connections between concepts
• Reason applied to sensory input yields generalizations which are only probable
![Page 3: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Psychologism
• A form of empiricism• Adopted by John Stuart Mill, as well as a
number of German philosophers of the late nineteenth century
• Basic thesis: the “laws” of logic are only empirical generalizations based on observation of the workings of the human mind
![Page 4: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Basic Argument for Psychologism
1. Inference from premises to conclusion is a psychological process.
2. Laws governing psychological processes are psychological laws.
3. Psychological laws are empirical generalizations.
4. So, laws governing inferences are empirical generalizations.
![Page 5: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Kantian Response
• Psychological laws are descriptive, while laws of logic are normative
• Descriptive laws tell us what is, while normative laws tell us about what ought to be
• Analogy: basing moral laws on observation of human behavior alone
![Page 6: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Rebuttal by Psychologism
• The purpose of logic is to further the goals of the mind
• How best to further these goals depends on how the mind works
• The workings of the mind are governed by psychological laws
![Page 7: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Circularity Response
• Psychology itself depends on laws of logic
• If laws of logic are based on psychology, then they are based on themselves
• Laws of logic based on themselves are circular
![Page 8: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Rebuttal by Psychologism
• Logic applies to itself, and so there is an apparent circularity: logic establishes the validity of the rules it presupposes
• But it does not do so by using laws of logic as premises in arguments establishing the validity of arguments
• Logic is used as a standard of valid arguments instead
![Page 9: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Middle Way
• Both sides have grasped part of the truth about the laws of logic
• Psychologism correctly recognizes that logic is used as a tool to regulate inference, which is a psychological process
• But it mistakenly takes this process to be the subject-matter of logic
• The real subject-matter of logic is an ideal realm
![Page 10: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Normativity of Logic
• A law of logic: no proposition is both true and false
• This law has no normative content: it says nothing about what one ought to believe
• But its meaning gives it an “intrinsic prerogative in the regulation of our thought”
![Page 11: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The “Circularity” of Logic
• The proposition that no proposition is both true and false applies to itself
• It is not both true and false
• But this self-reference is not harmful, but “an obvious truism”
![Page 12: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What Logic is About
• The laws of thought describe an ideal realm, just as with mathematics
• Populating the ideal realm are “Truth, Proposition, Subject, Object, Property, Ground and Consequent, Relation and Relatum, etc.”
• Truths regarding this realm are self-evident, involving a “primal givenness”
![Page 13: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Phenomenology
• True and false judgments have the same phenomenological content
• The content of the judgment is what is “meant” by it
• There is a separate “experience of truth”• The truth is given in the agreement between
what is meant and what is present (the ideal objects, in the case of logic)
![Page 14: Husserl I. The Realm of Ideas Philosophy 157 ©2002, G. J. Mattey.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cef5503460f949bd8a7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Logic and Evidence
• A judgment is true if and only if it is inwardly evident
• Being inwardly evident can be construed as a psychological state.
• But truth and inward evidence are only materially equivalent, and concern different subject-matters
• The law of non-contradiction governs what can be inwardly evident
• But the realm of the logically possible may outstrip the abilities of the human mind