Humphrey gpa overview training edition.v.2
-
Upload
hossein-mirzaie -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
2.066 -
download
1
Transcript of Humphrey gpa overview training edition.v.2
1
Humphrey® Glaucoma Progression Analysis™ (GPA™) Software
for the Humphrey® Field Analyzer
2
Issues facing visual field progression analysis today
Variability in patient test taking
Multiple exams required to detect change
Many schools of thought or “rules of thumb” on how much change confirms change
Estimating “rate” of progression is difficult with today’s tools
Need for Glaucoma Progression Analysis Using Visual Fields
3
The Humphrey® GPATM Solution• Algorithms and Criteria
Enrolled Hundreds of Glaucoma Patients in Multi-Center Trial to Quantify Visual Field Variability
Uses SITA and Pattern Deviation to Identify Glaucoma-Specific Progression
Employs Strict Progression Criteria from EMGT Study1
Mean Deviation Slope Plot Helps Identify Rapidly Progressing Patients
• Software Design• User Friendly Interface• Automated test selection• GPA Results on Single Field Printouts
Introducing Humphrey® Glaucoma Progression Analysis™ Software
1. Heijl, Leske,Bengtsson, Bengtsson,Hussein, and the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Measuring Visual Field Progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003; 81:286-293
4
• Contributors to variability2,3:• Field and Point Status
(deviation from normal) • Eccentricity of field• Patient test-taking
experience• Strategy chosen – SITA or
Full Threshold
• Large glaucoma database defines expected variability
• GPA flags progression at points exceeding expected patient variability
Tested Threshold
Ret
este
d T
hre
sho
ld
Impaired Vision
Not Progressing
Perfect Test
Result
Test-Retest Variability
NormalVision
Identifying Progression in Visual Fields
Progressing
Impaired
Normal
2. Bengtsson B, Heijl A., Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999; 77(2): 125-129
3. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 76(3): 268-272
5
• Minimum of three tests required: 2 baseline and 1 follow-up exam
• Each follow-up compared to averaged thresholds of 2 baseline exams
• Additional follow-up compared both to baseline and to 2 most recent follow-ups
• Symbols:
• Three in one exam denotes “Possible Progression” and three equals “Likely Progression”
Criteria For Identifying Progression in Visual Fields
= Progression at 95% significance level
= Progressing point repeated in two consecutive exams
= Progressing point repeated in three consecutive exams
6
Applying GPA To Your Practice:Setting Up An Analysis
• Doctors can access the GPA from four different directions:
•View Test
•Recall Test
•Print Test
•Immediately After An Exam
• All Options will take the doctor to the “Threshold Printout Selection” Menu
7
Applying GPA To Your Practice:Selecting GPA
• Doctor or technician selects the Glaucoma Progression Analysis Printout
8
Applying GPA To Your Practice:Selecting Your GPA Print Options
• If GPA has not yet been set up for the current patient, the doctor will be taken straight to the “Exam Selection” screen
• If GPA has been set up for this patient, the following screen appears.
• If Progression is confirmed, it is recommended that the doctor view the full GPA Analysis (Baseline & Follow-Up Printouts)
9
Applying GPA To Your Practice:Baseline and Follow-Up Exam Selection
• For current patients, during next visit, set up GPA for each patient• For challenging cases, retrospective analysis is available• GPA assists with Set Up and remembers settings for patient’s next
visit Note: GPA automatically identifies tests with questionable reliability indices
• Once set up is completed, new exams are automatically added to the analysis
Exam Selection - GPA
Rev 3.2 (0011) 02-03-2003 10:14 AM
Disk Options Patient Search Select All Proceed
Source: Hard Drive Order: Name Range: Restricted
SITA SAMPLE
SITA SAMPLE
SITA SAMPLE
SITA SAMPLE
SITA SAMPLE
SITA SAMPLE
SITA SAMPLE
Name DOB Eye Test Date
*
*
02-02-1922
02-02-1922
02-02-1922
02-02-1922
02-02-1922
02-02-1922
02-02-1922
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
SS-24-2
SS-24-2
SS-24-2
SS-24-2
SS-24-2
SS-24-2
SS-24-2
01-06-2003
01-06-2002
07-06-2001
01-06-2000
01-06-1999
01-06-1998
01-06-1997
Full Threshold tests are allowed to be used asbaseline only.
> Follow-up * Baseline? Low Reliability Follow-up
>
>
?
>
Baseline
Follow-up
Exam with High False Positive Rate
10
Typical GPA Result
11/27/97 4/18/01 12/15/98
4/18/02 11/20/02
Baseline Follow-up
Multiple Exams
Rate of Progression Plot
11
GPA Follow-Up Printout Overview
, , and identify change and repeatable change
Gray Scale Plot
Pattern Deviation Probability Plot
Deviation from Baseline (Pattern Deviation dB)
Plain Language Interpretation of Analysis: “Possible Progression” or “Likely Progression”
Reliability Indices for each exam
**Low Test Reliability**
Sample warning: Check reliability indices
12
Single Field Analysis with GPA Results
The new look in the standard of care!
Once GPA is set up for a patient, progression is automatically analyzed after each new visit
Original single field analysis will be printed if GPA has not been set up
GPA on Single Field
Printout
13
Case Study 1: Finding Progression
GPA confirms repeatable, consistent change is seen at five points in the field
Pattern Deviation Probability Plot appears variable or even improving
14
Case Study 2: Sorting Out Variability
GPA Identifies Changes, but not at consistent points in the field and therefore not Confirmed Progression
Pattern Deviation shows variability, but maybe some consistency between Follow-up #1 and #3
15
Availability
Commercial Release:
October 15, 2003
Instrument Compatibility: – 730, 735, 740, 740i, 745, 745i, 750, 750i models– 720 and 720i models ONLY after upgrade to Model 730