Humans and primates: New model organisms for evolutionary developmental biology?
1
Humans and Primates: New Model Organisms for Evolutionary Developmental Biology? If the animals in George Orwell’s Animal Farm had been biologists, they might have proclaimed that while all organisms are unique, some are more unique than others. Perhaps with some justification, we humans often apply that essenti- alist view to our own especially interesting phenotype. We are the only striding, tailless bipeds; we have absurdly long ontogenies for our body size; our brains are approximately six times the size predicted for a mammal of our body mass; we are capable of complex language, planning, theories of mind, and so on. The list could go on, and we all have our particular favorite unique human attributes (sweat glands, penis size, etc.). Human uniqueness is worthy of study for many reasons, both practical and intellectual, and there has been no lack of interest, speculation and research on the evolution of our peculiar pheno- types. However, very little of this research has been on development. For the most part, research on human evolution has focused on elucidating the fossil record, and quantifying patterns of variation (both genetic and phenotypic). There have been myriad studies of the evolution of human and primate ontogeny, including several recent vo- lumes. But most of these studies have been fundamentally about understanding how patterns of ontogeny changed (e.g., via heterochrony ana- lyses) rather than understanding the genetic mechanisms that underlie these changes. In other words, the evolutionary developmental biology (‘evo-devo’) revolution remains rarely applied to human and primate evolution. There are several reasons for this unfortunate state of affairs. The most obvious is that we are not obvious model organisms for experimentation. We cannot manipulate human development in the way we can a mouse or a chick or a zebrafish. Primates are also problematic experimental mod- els from both moral and practical points of view. Another problem is structural: human and pri- mate evolutionary research has often occurred in the context of anthropology rather than biology departments. While well versed in anatomy, archaeology, and evolutionary theory, many paleoanthropologists do not have the specialized training in developmental biology and genetics necessary to do evo-devo. In addition, infrastruc- ture and funding for basic research in human evolution is very minimal compared to what is available for developmental biologists. But these are problems that must be seen as challenges not excuses. As a field, evo-devo is vitally important for studying human and primate evolution because of the importance of studying process. Phenotypic patterns are the result of developmental processes. If we do not understand the processes that generate them, then we will not really be able to test hypotheses about what happened in human evolution. In addition, we have drastically underestimated our own potential as a different kind of model animal for evolutionary developmental biology. We know an incredible amount about the human genome, human genetic variation, and human physiology and anatomy. We have a fantastic and well-studied fossil record of human evolution that is uniquely accompanied by an archaeological record that preserves information on behavior unavailable for any other species. Our nonhuman primate relatives are well studied for most of these categories (including the complete chimpanzee genome), providing a rich set of relevant compara- tive data. And new genetic techniques enable us to study candidate genes of relevance to human evolution in other species such as the mouse. In short, biologists should consider looking at hu- mans and primates both as a means and an end to studying the evolution of development. With this goal in mind, we have assembled a series of papers on human and primate evodevo. So far, human and primate evo-devo is a small field. Even so, we were regrettably unable to entice everyone working on the subject to contribute. Nonetheless, the papers that follow should provide some ideas and perspectives on an array of topics interesting to a wide range of biologists. –Daniel Lieberman Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley. com). DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21001 r 2004 WILEY-LISS, INC. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY (MOL DEV EVOL) 302B:195 (2004)
-
Upload
daniel-lieberman -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Humans and primates: New model organisms for evolutionary developmental biology?
Humans and Primates: New Model Organisms forEvolutionary Developmental Biology?
If the animals in George Orwell’s Animal Farmhad been biologists, they might have proclaimedthat while all organisms are unique, some aremore unique than others. Perhaps with somejustification, we humans often apply that essenti-alist view to our own especially interestingphenotype. We are the only striding, taillessbipeds; we have absurdly long ontogenies for ourbody size; our brains are approximately six timesthe size predicted for a mammal of our body mass;we are capable of complex language, planning,theories of mind, and so on. The list could go on,and we all have our particular favorite uniquehuman attributes (sweat glands, penis size, etc.).
Human uniqueness is worthy of study for manyreasons, both practical and intellectual, and therehas been no lack of interest, speculation andresearch on the evolution of our peculiar pheno-types. However, very little of this research hasbeen on development. For the most part, researchon human evolution has focused on elucidating thefossil record, and quantifying patterns of variation(both genetic and phenotypic). There have beenmyriad studies of the evolution of human andprimate ontogeny, including several recent vo-lumes. But most of these studies have beenfundamentally about understanding how patternsof ontogeny changed (e.g., via heterochrony ana-lyses) rather than understanding the geneticmechanisms that underlie these changes. In otherwords, the evolutionary developmental biology(‘evo-devo’) revolution remains rarely applied tohuman and primate evolution.
There are several reasons for this unfortunatestate of affairs. The most obvious is that we are notobvious model organisms for experimentation. Wecannot manipulate human development in theway we can a mouse or a chick or a zebrafish.Primates are also problematic experimental mod-els from both moral and practical points of view.Another problem is structural: human and pri-mate evolutionary research has often occurred inthe context of anthropology rather than biologydepartments. While well versed in anatomy,archaeology, and evolutionary theory, manypaleoanthropologists do not have the specialized
training in developmental biology and geneticsnecessary to do evo-devo. In addition, infrastruc-ture and funding for basic research in humanevolution is very minimal compared to what isavailable for developmental biologists.
But these are problems that must be seen aschallenges not excuses. As a field, evo-devo isvitally important for studying human and primateevolution because of the importance of studyingprocess. Phenotypic patterns are the result ofdevelopmental processes. If we do not understandthe processes that generate them, then we will notreally be able to test hypotheses about whathappened in human evolution.
In addition, we have drastically underestimatedour own potential as a different kind of modelanimal for evolutionary developmental biology.We know an incredible amount about the humangenome, human genetic variation, and humanphysiology and anatomy. We have a fantastic andwell-studied fossil record of human evolution thatis uniquely accompanied by an archaeologicalrecord that preserves information on behaviorunavailable for any other species. Our nonhumanprimate relatives are well studied for most of thesecategories (including the complete chimpanzeegenome), providing a rich set of relevant compara-tive data. And new genetic techniques enable us tostudy candidate genes of relevance to humanevolution in other species such as the mouse. Inshort, biologists should consider looking at hu-mans and primates both as a means and an end tostudying the evolution of development.
With this goal in mind, we have assembled aseries of papers on human and primate evodevo.So far, human and primate evo-devo is a smallfield. Even so, we were regrettably unable to enticeeveryone working on the subject to contribute.Nonetheless, the papers that follow should providesome ideas and perspectives on an array of topicsinteresting to a wide range of biologists.
–Daniel Lieberman
Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21001
r 2004 WILEY-LISS, INC.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY (MOL DEV EVOL) 302B:195 (2004)
