Human Rights Experts Rap U.N

download Human Rights Experts Rap U.N

of 2

Transcript of Human Rights Experts Rap U.N

  • 7/27/2019 Human Rights Experts Rap U.N

    1/2

    10/25/13 Human rights experts rap U.N. report on Fukushima radiation | The Japan Times

    www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/25/national/human-rights-experts-rap-u-n-report-on-fukushima-radiation/#.UmpFpPmJXFE 1/2

    NATIONAL

    Human rights experts rap U.N. report onFukushima radiationKYODO

    OCT 25, 2013ARTICLE HISTORYPRINT SHARENEW YORK Human rights experts,

    including a U.N. special rapporteur, are criticizing a U.N. scientific report

    dismissing concerns about the effects of radiation from the Fukushima

    nuclear disaster on the Japanese public.

    Speaking Thursday at an event organized by U.S. and Japanese

    nongovernmental groups, U.N. special rapporteur on the right to health

    Anand Grover took issue with the reports conclusion that there is nothing toworry about for members of the public exposed to radiation from

    Fukushima No. 1.

    The report was prepared by the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of

    Atomic Radiation.

    The committee, which studied the levels and effects of radiation exposure

    caused by the nuclear disaster after the March 11, 2011, earthquake andtsunami, found that for the general public, no discernible increased

    incidence of radiation-related health effects are expected.

    Grover, who visited Japan in November 2012 and compiled his own report on

    the situation from a human rights perspective, said the data on radioactive

    exposure is insufficient to rule out the possibility that low doses could have ill

    effects on health.

    He also said that ensuring the participation of affected communities in

    decision-making is one of the core obligations of governments and that the

    public has a right to information.

    Special rapporteurs are independent investigators tasked by the United

    Nations with investigating human rights issues and can only investigate a

    country if invited to do so by its government.

    Mari Inoue, a representative of Tokyo-based Human Rights Now, meanwhile

    called for the UNSCEAR report to be revised.

    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/national/http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300&pubid=jtimeshttp://window.print%28%29/http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/25/national/human-rights-experts-rap-u-n-report-on-fukushima-radiation/#article_historyhttp://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/national/
  • 7/27/2019 Human Rights Experts Rap U.N

    2/2

    10/25/13 Human rights experts rap U.N. report on Fukushima radiation | The Japan Times

    www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/25/national/human-rights-experts-rap-u-n-report-on-fukushima-radiation/#.UmpFpPmJXFE 2/2

    She said the report should endorse evacuation from areas where exposure

    exceeds 1 millisievert of radiation per year, well below the Japanese

    governments yardstick of 20 millisieverts per year.

    It should also recommend continued study of contract workers exposed to

    radiation, increased community participation in the government response tothe disaster, and recognition that it is too early to rule out future health

    effects for the exposed, Inoue said.

    Also on Thursday, Human Rights Now released a statement signed by 64

    community organizations in Japan calling for revisions to the report.

    The UNSCEARs full report, including scientific data supporting its findings,

    has not yet been published. The group said when finished, the report will bethe most comprehensive scientific analysis of the information available to

    date.