U.N. FCCC, Bracknell, 25-27 Sep 2002 Experts Meeting on Assessment of
Human Rights Experts Rap U.N
-
Upload
shadowsssinner -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Human Rights Experts Rap U.N
-
7/27/2019 Human Rights Experts Rap U.N
1/2
10/25/13 Human rights experts rap U.N. report on Fukushima radiation | The Japan Times
www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/25/national/human-rights-experts-rap-u-n-report-on-fukushima-radiation/#.UmpFpPmJXFE 1/2
NATIONAL
Human rights experts rap U.N. report onFukushima radiationKYODO
OCT 25, 2013ARTICLE HISTORYPRINT SHARENEW YORK Human rights experts,
including a U.N. special rapporteur, are criticizing a U.N. scientific report
dismissing concerns about the effects of radiation from the Fukushima
nuclear disaster on the Japanese public.
Speaking Thursday at an event organized by U.S. and Japanese
nongovernmental groups, U.N. special rapporteur on the right to health
Anand Grover took issue with the reports conclusion that there is nothing toworry about for members of the public exposed to radiation from
Fukushima No. 1.
The report was prepared by the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of
Atomic Radiation.
The committee, which studied the levels and effects of radiation exposure
caused by the nuclear disaster after the March 11, 2011, earthquake andtsunami, found that for the general public, no discernible increased
incidence of radiation-related health effects are expected.
Grover, who visited Japan in November 2012 and compiled his own report on
the situation from a human rights perspective, said the data on radioactive
exposure is insufficient to rule out the possibility that low doses could have ill
effects on health.
He also said that ensuring the participation of affected communities in
decision-making is one of the core obligations of governments and that the
public has a right to information.
Special rapporteurs are independent investigators tasked by the United
Nations with investigating human rights issues and can only investigate a
country if invited to do so by its government.
Mari Inoue, a representative of Tokyo-based Human Rights Now, meanwhile
called for the UNSCEAR report to be revised.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/national/http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300&pubid=jtimeshttp://window.print%28%29/http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/25/national/human-rights-experts-rap-u-n-report-on-fukushima-radiation/#article_historyhttp://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/national/ -
7/27/2019 Human Rights Experts Rap U.N
2/2
10/25/13 Human rights experts rap U.N. report on Fukushima radiation | The Japan Times
www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/25/national/human-rights-experts-rap-u-n-report-on-fukushima-radiation/#.UmpFpPmJXFE 2/2
She said the report should endorse evacuation from areas where exposure
exceeds 1 millisievert of radiation per year, well below the Japanese
governments yardstick of 20 millisieverts per year.
It should also recommend continued study of contract workers exposed to
radiation, increased community participation in the government response tothe disaster, and recognition that it is too early to rule out future health
effects for the exposed, Inoue said.
Also on Thursday, Human Rights Now released a statement signed by 64
community organizations in Japan calling for revisions to the report.
The UNSCEARs full report, including scientific data supporting its findings,
has not yet been published. The group said when finished, the report will bethe most comprehensive scientific analysis of the information available to
date.