HUDSON RIVER PCBs REASSESSMENT RI/FS PHASE 3 …LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 3 3-1 Features of Interest...
17
HUDSON RIVER PCBs REASSESSMENT RI/FS PHASE 3 REPORT: FEASIBILITY STUDY LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 3 3-1 Features of Interest in the Upper Hudson Vicinity 3-2 Location of 1996 and 1997 GE Float Survey Samples 3-3 GE Float Survey Results for the TI Pool 3-4 Principal Component 1 versus Principal Component 2 and MDPR versus Delta MW for GE Float Survey Data 3-5 Effective Rogers Island Concentration on Mixing Curve 3-6 Cohesive Sediment Area and Central Channel Total PCBs as a Function of River Mile 3-7 1999 Coring Results in Hot Spot 14 3-8 Erosion Area in TI Pool as Identified by Side Scan Sonar 3-9 Length Weighted Average Concentration and Mass per Unit Area Calculations 3-10 Correlations Among PCB Metrics for 1984 NYSDEC Sediment Survey 3-11 Correlations Among PCB Metrics for USEPA Low Resolution Sediment Coring Survey 3-12 Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in TI Pool (based on 1984 sediment survey) 3-13 Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in the Cohesive Area in the TI Pool (based on 1984 sediment survey) 3-14 Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in the Non-cohesive Area in the TI Pool (based on 1984 sediment survey) 3-15 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 8 3-16 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 14 3-17 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 28 3-18 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: RM 183.25 - 184.25 3-19 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 36 3-20 Selection of Remediation Areas for Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 8 3-21 Selection of Remediation Areas for Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 14 3-22 Assessment of the Capture Efficiency for the Expanded Hot Spot Remediation Tri+ PCB Concentration and MPA Histograms for 1984 NYSDEC Data Within and Outside of Remedial Area 3-23 Assessment of the Capture Efficiency for the Hot Spot Remediation Tri+ PCB Concentration and MPA Histograms for 1984 NYSDEC Data Within and Outside of Remedial Area
Transcript of HUDSON RIVER PCBs REASSESSMENT RI/FS PHASE 3 …LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 3 3-1 Features of Interest...
HUDSON RIVER PCBs REASSESSMENT RI/FSPHASE 3 REPORT: FEASIBILITY STUDY
LIST OF FIGURESCHAPTER 3
3-1 Features of Interest in the Upper Hudson Vicinity3-2 Location of 1996 and 1997 GE Float Survey Samples3-3 GE Float Survey Results for the TI Pool3-4 Principal Component 1 versus Principal Component 2 and MDPR versus Delta MW for GE
Float Survey Data3-5 Effective Rogers Island Concentration on Mixing Curve3-6 Cohesive Sediment Area and Central Channel Total PCBs as a Function of River Mile3-7 1999 Coring Results in Hot Spot 143-8 Erosion Area in TI Pool as Identified by Side Scan Sonar3-9 Length Weighted Average Concentration and Mass per Unit Area Calculations3-10 Correlations Among PCB Metrics for 1984 NYSDEC Sediment Survey3-11 Correlations Among PCB Metrics for USEPA Low Resolution Sediment Coring Survey3-12 Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in TI Pool (based on 1984 sediment
survey)3-13 Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in the Cohesive Area in the TIPool (based on 1984 sediment survey)3-14 Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in the Non-cohesive Area in the TI
Pool (based on 1984 sediment survey)3-15 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 83-16 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 143-17 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 283-18 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: RM 183.25 - 184.253-19 Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 363-20 Selection of Remediation Areas for Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 83-21 Selection of Remediation Areas for Hot Spot Removal: Hot Spot 143-22 Assessment of the Capture Efficiency for the Expanded Hot Spot Remediation Tri+ PCB
Concentration and MPA Histograms for 1984 NYSDEC Data Within and Outside of RemedialArea
3-23 Assessment of the Capture Efficiency for the Hot Spot Remediation Tri+ PCB Concentrationand MPA Histograms for 1984 NYSDEC Data Within and Outside of Remedial Area
#S #S #S
#S#S#S
#S #S #S
#S#S#S
#S#S#S
#S #S #S
#S#S #S
#S #S#S
#S #S #S
#S #S #S
#S #S #S
#S#S #S
#S#S
#S
#S#S
#S
Match Line 1G r i f f i n I s l a n d
#S #S #S
#S #S #S
#S#S #S
#S#S
#S
#S#S
#S
#S #S #S
#S #S #S
#S#S#S
#S#S
#S
#S#S#S
#S#S#S
#S
#S
#S
#S
#S
#S
#S#S
R o g e r s I s l a n d
Old MoreauLandfill
194
193
192
195
Former Fort Edward Dam(RM 194.8)
Match Line 1
Lock 7 (RM 193.7)
197
US Hwy 4
New MoreauLandfill
N
EW
S
Hudson River PCBs ReassessmentFeasibility Study Locations of 1996 and 1997
GE Float Survey Samples
Figure 3-2 Sheet 1 of 1
TAMS Consultants, Inc.RM 194.8 - 188.5
1000 0 1000Scale in Feet
300 0 300Scale in Meters
KEY MAP
C
E
D
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
B
A
RoadShoreline at 8,471 cfs
Dam and LockRiver Mile Marker192
LEGEND
Railroad/Siding
1996-1997 GE Float Survey Sample LocationsWest Shore Channel#S
Center Channel#S
East Shore Channel #S
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
188189190191192193194195
6/17/1997
West Shore
Central Channel
East Shore
Tot
al P
CB
(pp
t)
River Mile
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
188189190191192193194195
6/4/1997
West Shore
Central Channel
East Shore
Tot
al P
CB
(pp
t)
River Mile
0
50
100
150
188189190191192193194195
9/25/1996
West Shore
Central Channel
East Shore
Tot
al P
CB
(pp
t)
River Mile
0
50
100
150
188189190191192193194195
9/24/1996
West Shore
Central Channel
East Shore
Tot
al P
CB
(pp
t)
River Mile
Figure 3-3GE Float Survey Results for the TI Pool
TAMS
Figure 3-4Principal Component 1 versus Principal Component 2
and MDPR versus ∆∆ MW for GE Float Survay Data
TAMS
East
West
Central
Above 193192191190189Below 189
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
1996 and 1997
Prin
cipa
l Com
pone
nt 2
Principal Component 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
1996 and 1997
MD
PR
∆MW
F igure 3-5Effect ive Rogers Is land Concentration on M ixing Curve
T A M S
0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
9 /24/969 /25/966 /4/976 /17/97
y = 0.73755 - 6 .2394x R2= 0 .83025
y = 0.74809 - 4 .5069x R2= 0 .6531
y = 0 .8693 - 8 .305x R2= 0 .87525
y = 0.80013 - 17.289x R2= 0 .7449
MD
PR
Inverse Total PCB Concentrat ion (ppt-1
)
Center Channel Concentration Cumulative Cohesive Sediment Area
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
188189190191192193194195
9/24/96%
Cum
ulative Cohesive Sedim
ent T
otal
PC
B C
once
ntra
tion
(ng/
L) Outlier
Figure 3-6Cohesive Sediment Area and Central Channel Total PCBs
as a Function of River Mile
TAMS
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
188189190191192193194195
6/17/97
River Mile
Tot
al P
CB
Con
cent
ratio
n (n
g/L
)%
Cum
ulative Cohesive Sedim
ent
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
188189190191192193194195
6/4/97
% C
umulative C
ohesive Sediment
Tot
al P
CB
Con
cent
ratio
n (n
g/L
)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
188189190191192193194195
9/25/96
% C
umulative C
ohesive Sediment
Tot
al P
CB
Con
cent
ratio
n (n
g/L
)
Source: GE Database Transmittal June 2000 (Werth, 2000) GE 1996-1997 Float Surveys of the TI Pool USEPA Sidescan Sonar Survey Hudson River Database Release 5 , October 2000 Note: Cumulative cohesive sediment is based on the side-scan sonar surveys (Flood, 1993) and is normalized to the total surface area of the TI Pool
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
P14-04Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 100 200 300 400 500
P14-03Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 100 200 300 400 500
P14-01
Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
P14-02
Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
100 5 10 15 20 25 30
P14-12Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
100 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
P14-10
Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
100 20 40 60 80 100 120
P14-09Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
100 5 10 15 20
P14-07Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
100 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
P14-05Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200
P14-06
Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
0
2
4
6
8
100 5 10 15 20 25
P14-13
Dep
th, c
m
TPCB Concentration, ppm
Figure 3-71999 Coring Results in Hot Spot 14
T A M S
Match Line 1
Match Line 2
Thompson Island Dam(RM 188.5)
G r i
f f i n
I s l
a n d
192
191
190
189
27 US Hwy 4
R o g e r s I s l a n dOld Moreau
LandfillNew Moreau
Landfill
194
193
192
195
Former Fort Edward Dam(RM 194.8)
Match Line 1
Lock 7 (RM 193.7)
197
US Hwy 4
N
EW
S
Hudson River PCBs ReassessmentFeasibility Study
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
B
A
KEY MAP
Sheet 1 of 2
TAMS Consultants, Inc.RM 194.8 - 188.5
1000 0 1000Scale in Feet
300 0 300Scale in Meters
Side Scan Sonar InterpretationCoarseFine
Hudson River ShorelineNYSDEC Hot Spots
DamsRoads
Lineated Structures
Figure 3-8Erosion Area in TI Pool
As indentified by Side Scan Sonar
(RM 188.5 - 181.0)Sheet 2 of 2
N
EW
S
Match Line 2
Match Line 3
Thompson Island Dam (RM 188.5)
Fort Miller Dam(RM 186.2)
187
188
186
185
Lock 6(RM 186.2)
184
Northumberland Dam(RM 183.4)
182
Match Line 3
Match Line 4
183
185
Lock 5(RM 182.6)
TAMS Consultants, Inc.
KEY MAP
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
B
A
Hudson River PCBs ReassessmentFeasibility Study
Figure 3-8Erosion Area in TI Pool
As indentified by Side Scan Sonar
1000 0 1000Scale in Feet
300 0 300
Scale in Meters
Side Scan Sonar InterpretationCoarseFine
Hudson River ShorelineNYSDEC Hot Spots
DamsRoads
Lineated Structures
UnitCorrections
Mass PCBsPer Unit Area
179 g/m2
1 g/m2
64 g/m2
=
=
=
=
Total Mass per Unit Area in Core: 244 g/m2
Figure 3-9 Length Weighted Average Concentration and Mass per Unit Area CalculationsSediment/Water
Interface
PCBsConcentration1
1,352 µg/g
343 µg/g
5 µg/g
Solid Specific Weight
0.52 g/cm3
0.74 g/cm3
0.88 g/cm3
25 cm
25 cm
25 cm
Length
=
=
=
33,800 cm* µg/g
8,575 cm* µg/g
125 cm* µg/g
= Product ofAbove Two
Total: 42,500 cm* µg/g
Length Weighted Average Concentration: 567 µg/g
/ 75 cm
10-6 g/µg ××
10-6 g/µg
10-6 g/µg
104 cm2/m2
104 cm2/m2
104 cm2/m2
××
××××
××
××××××
××
××
××
××
××
××
××
1. PCB concentration represents parts-per-million. TAMS
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 104
y = 2.839 * x^(0.97595) R2= 0.67335
Len
gth
Wei
ghte
d A
vera
ge T
ri+
Con
cent
ratio
n pp
m(0
- 1
2 in
.)
Tri+ MPA (g/m^2)
N=670
0.1
1
10
100
1000
104
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 104
y = 3.7703 * x^(0.87445) R2= 0.19188
Surf
ace
Tri
+ C
once
ntra
tion
ppm
Tri+ MPA g/m^2
Figure 3-10Correlations Among PCB Metrics for 1984 NYSDEC Sediment Survey
TAMS
Note:No screening data is included in the plot.
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
y = 3.4722 * x^(0.86887) R2= 0.52756
Len
gth
Wei
ghte
d A
vera
ge T
ri+
Con
cent
rati
on,
ppm
(0 -
12
in.)
Tri+ MPA g/m^2
N=170
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
y = 3.6399 * x^(0.82851) R2= 0.44399 S
urfa
ce T
ri+
Con
cent
rati
on p
pm
Tri+ MPA g/m^2
N=170
Figure 3-11Correlations Among PCB M etrics for USEPA Low Resolution
Sediment Coring Survey
T A M S
Figure 3-12Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area in TI Pool
(based on 1984 sediment survey)
TAMS
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rem
edia
tion
Are
a (a
cre)
MPA Threshold (g/m^2)
Weighted Curve
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
0 200 400 600
PCB
Mas
s R
emed
iate
d (k
g)
Remediation Area (acre)
10 g/m^2
3 g/m^2
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
PCB
Mas
s R
emed
iate
d (k
g)
MPA Threshold (g/m^2)
Weighted Curve
0
50
100
150
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rem
edia
tion
Are
a (a
cre)
MPA Threshold (g/m^2)
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
0 50 100 150
PC
B M
ass
Rem
edia
ted
(kg)
Remediation Area (acre)
3 g /m^2
10 g /m^2
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
PC
B M
ass
Rem
edia
ted
(kg)
MPA Threshold (g/m^2)
Figure 3-13R e lationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area
in the Cohesive Area in the TI Pool(based on 1984 sediment survey)
T A M S
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Rem
edia
tion
Are
a (a
cre)
MPA Threshold (g/m^2)
Weighted Curve
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
0 100 200 300 400
PC
B M
ass
Rem
edia
ted
(kg)
Remediation Area (acre)
3 g/m^2
10 g/m^2
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
PC
B M
ass
Rem
edia
ted
(kg)
MPA Threshold (g/m^2)
Weighted Curve
Figure 3-14Relationship among MPA, PCB Mass and Sediment Area
in the Non-cohesive Area in the TI Pool(based on 1984 sediment survey)
TAMS
192
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0 #0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
192
&
& &
&&
&
&&
&&&&
&
& &&
&& & &
& &
& &
&
&
&
&&
192
&
& &
&&
&
&&
&&&&
&
& && &
& & &
& &
& &
&
&
&
&&
192
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0#0
192
192 192
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0 #0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
192
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0 #0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0#0#0
192
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$$
$
$
$
$
'
' '
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'
'
'' '
'
''
'
'''
''' '
'
'
' '
'
'
' '
'
192
%% %%% %%%
%% %%
% %%%
%%%
%
%
%
%
%%
%%%
%
%%
%%%% %% %%%%%%%
%%%%%%% % %%%%%%%
%% %%%%%% %
%%%
%%
%% %
%%
%% %% %%%
%
%%%%%
%%%% %
%%%
%% %%
%%%
% %%%
%% %
% %
%%% %%
%%% %%%
%%
%%%% %
(
(((((( (
(( ((( (( ((
(
( (
(((((
((
((( (( (( ( ((( ((
(( (( (
( (((( (
(( ( ((((( ((( ((( ((
((
((
(( (( ((( ((
((
(((
(( (
((((
( ((
((
((( (
(
192
((((( (
(( ((( (( ((
(
( (
(((((
((
((( (( (( ( ((( ((
(( (( (
( ( ((( ((( ( ((( (( ((( ((( (((
(((
(( (( ((( ((
((
(((
((
(((
(
(
((( (
%%%% %%
% %%% %%%
%%
%
%
%%
%%%
%
%%
%%%% %% %%%%%%%
%%%%%%% % %%%%%%%
%% %%%%%% %%%%
%%
%% %%%%% %% %
%%%
%%%% %%%%% %%
%%
%% %%%%%
% %%%
%% %
% %
%%% %%
%%% %%
%%
%
192
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$$
$
$
$
$
'
' '
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'
'
'' '
'
'
'
'
'''
''
''
'
' '
'
'
' '
'
192
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0#0#0#0#0#0
#0#0#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
192
#0 #0#0#0#0#0
#0 #0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0#0#0#0#0
#0
#0#0
192
#0 #0#0#0#0#0
#0 #0
#0
#0 #0
#0
#0#0#0#0#0
#0
#0#0
192
192
8
9
192
1977 MPA Grabs0 - 3.2'
3.2 - 10'
10 - 32'
32 - 100'
100 - 320'
320 - 1000'> 1000'
1977 MPA Cores0 - 3.2$
3.2 - 10$
10 - 32$
32 - 100$
100 - 320$
320 - 1000$> 1000$
PCB Inventory (g/m²)
1977 Surface Grabs
1977 Surface Cores$
$
$
$
$
$$
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
' > 1000' 320 - 1000
' 100 - 320
' 32 - 100
' 10 - 32
' 3.2 - 10
' 0 - 3.2
0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320320 - 1000> 1000
1984 MPA Cores0 - 3.2(
3.2 - 10(
10 - 32(
32 - 100(
100 - 320(
320 - 1000(> 1000(
1984 MPA Grabs%
%
%
%
%%%
PCB Inventory (g/m²)
> 1000320 - 1000100 - 32032 - 10010 - 323.2 - 100 - 3.2
1984 Surface Grabs0 - 3.2%
3.2 - 10%
10 - 32%
32 - 100%
100 - 320%
320 - 1000%> 1000%
1984 Surface Cores(
(
(
(
(
((
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
> 1000320 - 1000100 - 32032 - 10010 - 323.2 - 100 - 3.2
1984 MPA Theissen Polygons
PCB Inventory (g/m²)
> 1000320 - 1000100 - 32032 - 10010 - 323.2 - 100 - 3.2
1984 Surface Theissen Polygons0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320320 - 1000> 1000
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
1991 Composite Sample Points#0
1991 Composite Samples (0-5cm)0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)1991 Composite Sample Points#0
1991 Composite Samples (5-10cm)0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
1991 Composite Sample Points#0
1991 Composite Samples (10-25cm)0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
1994 MPA Cores0 - 3.2&
3.2 - 10&
10 - 32&
32 - 100&
100 - 320&
320 - 1000&> 1000&
PCB Inventory (g/m²)1994 Surface Cores
&
&
&
&
&&&
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
> 1000320 - 1000100 - 32032 - 10010 - 323.2 - 100 - 3.2
1998 Composite Sample Points#0
1998 Composite Samples (0-2cm)0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
1998 Composite Sample Points#0
1998 Composite Samples (2-5cm)0 - 3.23.2 - 1010 - 3232 - 100100 - 320
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
192
1998 Surface Cores0 - 3.2#0
3.2 - 10#0
10 - 32#0
32 - 100#0
100 - 320#0320 - 1000#0> 1000#0
PCB Concentration (mg/kg)
NYSDEC Hot Spot
Side Scan Sonar Interpretation (C-N)CohesiveNon-cohesive
Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal
Approximate Water Depth (ft) at 3,090 cfs6.512.5
Side Scan Sonar InterpretationMoundRock
Hudson River Shoreline at 8,471 cfs
Dam or Lock
Road
Rivermile Markers
LEGEND
Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal
N
EW
S
1000 0 1000 2000 Feet
Figure 3-15. Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded Hot Spot Removal:
Figure 3-15
1998 MPA Cores0 - 3.2#0
3.2 - 10#0
10 - 32#0
32 - 100#0
100 - 320#0320 - 1000#0> 1000#0
PCB Inventory (g/m²)
TAMS Consultants, Inc.
Hudson River PCBs ReassessmentFeasibility Study Selection of Remediation Areas for Expanded
Hot Spot Removal:
1 2 43
7 865
9 10 1211
15 161413
17 18 19
Remediation Areas for Hot Spot Removal
Hot Spot 8
Hot Spot 8
