Document
description
Transcript of Document
West County Transportation for Seniors & People with Disabilities
Prepared for:WCCTAC Study Session
July 30, 2010
Prepared by:Paratransit Working Group
Study Session Objectives
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20102
Get to know transportation needs of, and services for, West County’s population of seniors and people with disabilities (S&PwD)
Provide guidance to Paratransit Working Group for programming dedicated Measure J funds
Flesh out need or desire for West County-wide initiatives or program
Overarching Policy Issues
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20103
Quality of LifeEquality in Mobility
Aging in Place – Independence & MobilityAccess to Health & Social Services
Affordability of Transportation Services
Financial & InstitutionalAmount of Funding and Subsidy
Effectiveness, Efficiency, AccountabilityEquity in Funding
Strategic & FlexibleCollaboration and Cooperation
Congestion & Air Quality
Priority of Transportation for S&PwD Relative to Other Public
Services (Police, Fire, Public Works, etc.)
Presentation Outline
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20104
I. Basics of Transportation for S&PwDII. Transportation for S&PwD in West CountyIII. What Have We Learned?IV. Discussion/Q&A
I. Basics ofTransportation for S&PwD
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20105
Terminology (as used in presentation)Term Definition
ADA/Non-ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, designated equal access to public transit for people with disabilities as civil rights. Non-ADA are services that are independent of Federal ADA requirements –may be beyond or just different.
Age in Place Not having to move from present residence in order to secure necessary support services in response to changing personal needs
CBTP Community-Based Transportation Provider – provides non-ADA transportation services. Not confined to seniors and people with disabilities, may extend to other demographics including youth, low-income, etc.
Demand-Response or Dial-A-Ride (DAR)
Service that operates in response to calls from passengers to the operator. Vehicles are dispatched to pick-up passengers and transport them to their destinations. Vehicles do not operate over a fixed route or on a fixed schedule. Routes change depending on the demand.
Fixed Route Transit service that operates on set schedule along specific routes
Low Income Below 200% of Federal poverty level
Mobility Management Approach to providing mobility that moves beyond establishing and operating traditional fixed route transit systems to fostering and organizing a network of diverse transportation services and providers to satisfy customer needs. Involves several functions and stakeholders. Starting point is the identification of transportation needs of a specific community and identifying service options and demand management strategies to respond to those needs. Transit agencies often serve as a travel agent by brokering customer needs with a variety of service providers and providing one-stop customer information on available services.
Paratransit Non-traditional transportation modes, such as ADA paratransit, municipal dial-a-ride services, community shuttles, and vanpool programs that are not fixed route or rail services but generally complement or supplement them.
Senior Person aged 65 or over
Travel Training Teaching a person how to ride fixed route transit
WCCTAC S&PwD Transportation Study Session, July 20106
S&PwD Population & Growth
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20107
190,000
130,000
300,000111,000
1,300,0001,000,000
0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000
Low-Income
Disabled
in 2030Aged 65+
in 2030Contra Costa
Population in 2005
30% increase
170% increase
Sou
rce:
AB
AG
- Aged 65+, Disabled, & Low-Income categories are not mutually exclusive
- 2030 projections for Disabled and Low-Income categories not readily available as of this writing
Spectrum of Needs
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20108
Transportation needs change as a person ages Physical and/or cognitive abilities of rider
Walk, drive, fixed route, ADA, homebound Level of assistance needed – curb-to-curb, door-to-door, door-
through-door; help with grocery bags, etc. Transitioning from one predominant mode to another
Nature of trips Proportion of home-based work to non-home-based work changes Some trips may be more predictable
Need to provide menu of services at any given time
Types of Services & Relationships
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 20109
ADA: Federal Civil Rights Requirements Only for those who can’t take fixed route due
to disability – eligibility not tied to age
Comparable to fixed route: w/in ¾- mile, same days & hours
Minimum next day service, within 1 hour of requested time
No more than 2x fixed route fare
No restrictions, prioritization by trip purpose
No limits on number of trips, no waiting lists
Fixed Route
Non-ADA
ADA
Non-ADA: Broad Spectrum of Discretionary Choices
Independent of spatial, temporal, & eligibility limits of ADA
Coordinated with health and human services (ex. adult daycare)
Mobility Management (like a brokerage and travel agent)
Many stakeholders
Incr
easi
ng
leve
l of s
ervi
ce
Paradigm Shifts Prior to ADA Paratransit aligned with social services Provided by non-profits & transit agencies under Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 Systems smaller and more flexible
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Equal access to public transit tied to civil rights Extended to all activities of government Unfunded mandate – funds diverted
Present Realign with social services Broader concepts of Mobility Management, Aging in place
WCCTAC S&PwD Transportation Study Session, July 201010
Mode Choice Factors
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201011
Disability – ADA or Not ADA Certified?
Age – Over or Under 65?
Trip Origin Location & Time – Within or Outside Fixed Route?
Trip Destination Location & Time – Within or Outside Fixed Route?
Return Trip Time – Within or Outside Fixed Route?
FIXED ROUTE ADA Non-
ADA
Advanced Notice – Known or Not?
Reported Unmet Needs in Bay Area
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201012
Enhanced Fixed Route
• More service in suburban & rural areas
• More direct service to activity centers
• Increased frequency & longer span of service
Enhanced Paratransit
• Same day, beyond hours and locations of fixed route
• Accommodations for uncommon wheelchairs
Connectivity
• Inter- and intra-county travel, for both fixed route & paratransit
• Enhanced accessibility accommodations at transfer sites
Information & Other Assistance
• How to use public transit & accessible features
• Information in variety of formats
• Proper training of service personnel
Pedestrian Access & Land Use Coordination
• Accessibility to bus stops & transfer stations
• Better coordination between land development & transit provisions
In 2005, MTC surveyed the nine-County Bay Area to prepare the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan, and this is what the people said:
II. West CountyTransportation for S&PwD
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201013
Senior (65 & Over) Population
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201014
1,100
580
570
2,500
1,400
890
480
490
290 260
1,400
4,700
9,800
Source: 2000 Census
2,600
30
East Richmond Heights
Bayview-Montalvin
North Richmond
People w/ Disabilities (5 & Over) Population
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201015
450
1,000
1,100
3,300
2,600
1,600
700
650
1,400 630
2,000
3,700
20,000
Source: 2000 Census
6,900
30
East Richmond Heights
Bayview-Montalvin
North Richmond
Service Providers
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201016
Fixed Route
•AC Transit•BART
ADA
•East Bay Paratransit Consortium (EBPC) (serves ALA & CC Co, SF destinations)
Community-Based
•El Cerrito•Richmond•San Pablo
Fixed Route
•WestCAT
ADA
•WestCAT(also serves Martinez destinations)
Community-Based
•WestCAT•Richmond
Northern Area
Southern Area
Note: This is only illustrative of the general service area of each provider. Actual service areas are more defined and can cross over between the Northern & Southern Areas.
Services
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201017
EBPC WestCAT El Cerrito Richmond San Pablo
Paratransit Service/Hours of Operation/ Reservation Window
Complementary ADA/ Same as fixed route/1-3 days advance reservation
Complementary ADA/Same as fixed route/1-14 days advance reservation, same day if available
Dial-A-Ride (DAR)/ M-F 6a-8p, Sa 9a-7p
Door-to-door/M-Th 9a-5p/1-10 days advance reservation, 830-930a to reserve for same day
Door-to-door/M-F 730a-5p/1 to 10 days advance reservation, same day if available
Taxi Scrip/24-7
Door-to-door/M-F 830a-4p/1 to 5 days advance reservation, same day if available
Service Area Southern West County, most of Alameda County, San Francisco
ADA depends on fixed routes, gen. Northern West County
DAR anywhere in service area
El Cerrito Richmond, East Richmond Heights, North Richmond, Kensington,Rollingwood, El Sobrante, El Cerrito, San Pablo, up to Appian Wyin Pinole
San Pablo
Other Services Standing orders
Transfers to other ADA providers
Group day trips (nursing homes)
Standing orders
Transfers to other ADA providers
Standing orders
Special Purpose Trips (Nutrition, Shopping, Other Activity Center, Employment, School)
Group day trips (throughout Bay Area)
Standing orders
Special Purpose Trips (Nutrition, Shopping)
Group day trips (within West County)
Subsidized EBPC tickets
Special Purpose Trips (Nutrition, Brown Bag, Doctors Hospital)
Group day trips (throughout Bay Area)
Eligibility Unable to take fixed route due to disability
65 or older or unable to take fixed route due to disability
DAR open to all
65 or older or disabled residents of El Cerrito
Group day trips open to non-residents
65 or older or disabled residents of Richmond, East Richmond Heights, North Richmond, Kensington, Rollingwood, El Sobrante
60 or older EBPC-eligible San Pablo residents
Coordination ADA Provider to ADA Provider Bay Area-wide agreement Certification is honored by all operators Transfers coordinated Confidentiality of sensitive client information (HIPAA) Fares payable to each provider
ADA Provider to Community-Based Transportation Provider (CBTP) and vice-versa Refer to each other by phone
CBTP to CBTP Refer to each other by phone
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201018
Operations
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201019
EBPCTotal (Contra Costa)
WestCAT El Cerrito Richmond San Pablo
Registered Clients 22,600 (2,500) 2,000 290 3,100 130
Passenger Trips 686,400 (87,400) 37,500 3,000 17,500 150/580 tix sold
Operating Cost $30,494,000 $1,158,000 $95,800 $1,151,000 $119,000
Operating Cost/ Passenger
$44 $31 $32 $66 $163
Revenue Service Hours
389,000 (46,700) 13,900 1,400 14,500 190
AveragePassenger Trip Distance
10.5 2.3 2.8 6.0 7.2
Number of Denials 1,938 (233) 0 3 Not tracked 0
Number of Group Trips/Passengers
18/107 0 92/660 61/411 164/1,205
Number of Vehicles
175 12 2 12 3
Service Delivery Method
Contracts withSeveral Providers
Contracts withOne Provider
City-owned Vehicles City-owned Vehicles City-owned Vehicles
Vehicles Deployed From
Oakland, San Leandro, Fremont
Pinole El Cerrito Richmond downtown San Pablo
Source: FY 2008-09 Data in FY 2010-11 Measure J Program 15 Claims
Funding
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201020
Fund EBPC WestCAT El Cerrito Richmond San Pablo
Measure J 133,400 (<1%) 146,100 (13%) 75,500 (72%) 315,200 (27%) 96,200 (93%)
Fares 2,100,000 (7%) 50,000 (4%) 11,700 (11%) 114,900 (10%) 5,800 (6%)
TDA (State) - 753,700 (66%) - - 350 (<1%)
STA (State) - 1,600 (<1%) - - -
FTA (Federal) - 192,100 (17%) - - -
General Fund 24,500,000 (78%) - 16,300 (16%) 718,800 (62%) -
Nutrition Program - - 800 (1%) 5,000 (<1%) 560 (1%)
Other 4,800,000 (15%) 2,250 (<1%) - - -
Total 31,500,000 (100%) 1,145,700 (100%) 104,400 (100%) 1,153,800 (100%) 102,900 (100%)Note: EBPC’s General Fund = $16.7M from AC Transit & $7.6M from BART; Other = ALA Co Measure B Source: FY 2010-11 estimates in FY 2010-11 Measure J Program 15 Claims
Measure J accounts for 12% of total funding spent in Contra Costa - nominal portion of ADA budget, large portion of CBTP budget
Farebox recovery low, subsidy high – akin to fixed route
Est. sales tax subsidy per EBPC passenger: ALA - $8, CC - $1.50
Only Richmond & El Cerrito supplement with General Fund contribution
Funding (cont’d) Measure J accounts for 12% of total funding spent in
Contra Costa – nominal portion of EBPC & WestCAT budget, large portion of CBTP budget
Farebox recovery low, subsidy high – like fixed route Est. sales tax subsidy per EBPC passenger ALA - $8, CC - $1.50
Only Richmond & El Cerrito contribute General Fund Fixed route and ADA have access to many funding
sources, but most controlled by others CBTP have access to fewer funding sources but have
greater discretion
WCCTAC S&PwD Transportation Study Session, July 201021
Funding Detail – Measure J
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201022
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Program 20b New Services= 0.65
Program 15 Growth = 0.231+0.035/yr
Richmond – 0.545
San Pablo – 0.166
El Cerrito – 0.093
PER
CEN
T O
F TO
TAL
SALE
S TA
X
FISCAL YEAR
Program 15 Base = 0.994 Total
Programmed Unprogrammed
WestCAT – 0.190
0.231
1.071
Funding Detail – Measure J (cont’d.)
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201023
Program Annual Funding(2011$)
EBPC WestCAT El Cerrito Richmond San Pablo
15 Base $645,000 $0 $123,000 $60,000 $354,000 $108,000
15 Growth $150,000 + $22,700/yrup to $695,000 total in 2034
TBD
20b New Services $422,000 TBD
Total $1,217,000 - $1,762,000
15 Base - fixed percent of sales tax to providers under Measure C
To guarantee continuation of existing services
Distribution percentages based on seniors, disabled, and low-income populations in 2000 (per Census data)
15 Growth - increasing percent of sales tax per year
For growth in target population and to include providers that didn’t receive Measure C, i.e. EBPC in West Co
20b New Services - fixed percent of sales tax
To supplement Program 15 services; ADA & non-ADA qualify
III. What Have We Learned?
The Paratransit Working Group has been working togetherfor the past year and a half...
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201024
What Have We Learned? Need for Self-Audit Need for Unifying Goals Overlaps Gaps Opportunities for Increasing Efficiency Additional Paratransit Possibilities for West County Sustainability
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201025
Need for Self-Audit (Beyond Financial)
There has not been an assessment of West County’s S&PwD needs & how well services meet those needs Trip origins and destinations (within and without West Co) Trip types and characteristics (health, social; recurring & on-
demand) User types (distribution by age and ability - fixed route-capable,
ADA, and CBTP; income level; language proficiency) Assessment of needs against provisions; identification of unmet
needs
Could result in different service prioritization May require consultant assistance
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201026
Need for Unifying Goals Different needs competing for same pot of money ADA – financial and operating assistance; increase focus on
West County versus Community-Based Transportation – maintain and expand
services; enhance community focus
Different horizons Address current funding shortfall versus Plan for longer term
Need for clarity in role of WCCTAC Respect local flexibility and discretion versus Be proactive about identifying needs for the region
Need for assurances versus flexibilityWCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201027
Overlaps
WCCTAC S&PwD Transportation Study Session, July 201028
Difficult to determine 256 permutations for every round trip
taken using fixed route, ADA, or CBTP Not including other factors specific to
individual – language proficiency, comfort levelwith fixed route or obtaining ADA certification, relationship with drivers, etc.
Not necessarily inefficient If trip can be served at lower cost by different provider If controlled through operational agreements
Need further study
Gaps Clients and Services Beyond ¾-mile ADA coverage – probably
limited; would need GIS analysis to confirm Beyond days & hours of ADA service – none in El Cerrito and
San Pablo (Richmond has taxi scrip, WestCAT has DAR) Special purpose, group trips – limited in WestCAT service area Non-ADA certified clients crossing CBT boundaries (ex. well
senior traveling from Richmond to County Hosp in Martinez)
Funding EBPC: equitably share given role in West Co paratransit WestCAT: contributions from Pinole, Hercules, County Richmond: contributions from County
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201029
Opportunities for Increasing Efficiency Enhance coordination among existing providers Scheduling and transfers via software & agreements ADA eligibility certification Resource sharing
Provider-specific enhancements Performance monitoring and reporting for Non-ADA High-tech
Expanding CBT services to be West County-wide Explore different service model(s) & additional
partnerships to enhance flexibility In-house vs. Contract vs. Hybrid, Trip Brokerages,
Decentralized vs. CentralizedWCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201030
Additional Paratransit Possibilities for West County
Same day service with taxis Coordination with Area Agency on Aging services -
Caring for Seniors, Meal Delivery, Consultation Services, Legal Services
Recurring cross-boundary trips to West County destinations – Medical, Shopping, etc.
Travel training, volunteer driver programs, non-profit shuttles, van retirement program
Mobility management
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201031
Sustainability Future demand and supply Senior Population Growth = 170% from 2010 to 2030 Future Funding
Measure J Program 15 guaranteed increaseby formula – est. 8% from 2010 to 2030
ADA is unfunded mandate, tied to transit Transit varies based on Fed & State fiscal situations
Shortfall may need to be addressed throughchanges to funding and in-kind contributionsfrom other sources (tax, GF, fares, grants)
Existing system is not sustainable as is Will need to change demand or supply or both Better to do in controlled fashion where feasible
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201032
IV. Discussion/Q&A
WCCTAC S&PwDTransportation Study Session, July 201033