Document
-
Upload
shannon-kellman -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Document
Roadmap to a 100% RE Future
Feed in Tariffs: A Time for Real Action on
Renewable Energy
June 12, 2010 San Francisco, California
Designing the Perfect FIT
• Defining the objective?
– Increasing the overall RE content
– Creating jobs and new Industries
– Improving the environment
– Mitigating climate change
– Increasing energy security
– Reducing energy costs
Designing the Perfect FIT
Review existing frameworks that support
the objectives – separate the doers from
the green washers!
– If the intent is not real the results will not be
significant (UK (initially), US, non FIT countries).
– Effectively Supporting the growth of a new
Sector is a key indicator
– Investment community must become a central player and partner in any scheme.
RPS systemsRPS a target or quota, can be legislated or determined in policy
regulations. May specify regulation to achieve the target/quota
• In many cases based on a system of tradable renewable credits
and bidding processes (RFPs)
• Value of the credits is determined by a wide range of design
parameters
Feed in Tariff Benefits
FEED-IN
•Rapid deployment of resources
•Rapid development of local manufacturing
•Increase in local acceptance and participation
•Encourages geographic distribution
•Transparent and lower administrative costs
•More jobs, more investment, more competition in
manufacturing, equipment and suppliers
•Projected and real costs are minimal
Benefits of RPS or Quota Systems
RPS (REC) Quota Systems
Predictable, rather than anarchic, market growth
Minimizes costs to taxpayers and/or ratepayers through
increased competition among developers
No picking technological winners
Market-based system of tradable credits
Projected costs minimal in reality – project costs are higher
RPS in Trouble (hopefully???)
• Focus on lower price
– Geographic concentration and utility influence
– High contract failure rates as there is investor uncertainty
Targets near-market technologies and leaves technology
markets to foreign manufacturers
Deployment rates under current regimes are insufficient to
meet stated objectives and expansion falling short of
targets in most cases as in CA.
Mono-price RPS market means windfalls for existing
generators and good sites with power companies in control
Favors oligopolies of large developers that can handle risks
of investment in centralized generation; drives out small
investors and companies• No picking winners means no portfolio diversity or
encouragement of longer term resources – not “dynamically
efficient”
• Administratively cumbersome and costly
Wind energy in Germany
In 2009 Germany installed nearly
2,000 MW of new wind generating
capacity--roughly equivalent to
1,000 wind turbines.
FIT Success Stories
FIT Success Stories Italy installs more capacity in two months 250 MWs than CA in a year
• Italy is three-fourths the size of California with similarly sized
economies. Italy has a population of 60 million, to California's 40
million. The population of the US is five times that of Italy.
FIT Success Stories
• Germany installed more solar PV in the first
month of 2010, about 240 MW, than the
state of California installed in all of 2009, 212
MW.
• Italy installed 720 MW of solar PV in 2009,
nearly all of that on rooftops. In contrast, the
US installed 435 MW during the same period
US RPS Laws
Newly Installed Wind Capacity in Europe
Designing the Perfect FIT
State initiatives and
programs play a
key role for the
development of
new technologies.
An Epic Battle
Incentives vs Subsidies
Designing the Perfect FIT
• Design the overall objective(s)
• Create a level playing field (keep utilities out)
• Design a system that is predictable, long term, transparent and easy to administer
• Ensure interconnection and payments
• Do not pick technological winners
• Built in flexibility to accommodate changes
• Encourage technological breakthroughs (R&D)
• No artificial limits
Future Actions
• Provide opportunity for technological and
economic development in all sectors
• Ensure Investor clarity and long term
confidence
• Built in flexibility to anticipate problems
• Anticipate new challenges and
opportunities
Future Actions
• Forge new alliances and partnerships
– Energy storage
– Transportation
– Micro-grids and smart grids
– Conservation
– Buildings as energy generators
In the meantime, fossil fuel dependence is causing
multiple convergent, existential crises.
If you don’t change directions,
you may end up where you are headed.
- Lao Tzu
Climate Crisis Water Crisis Food Crisis
Safety/Security Crisis Biodiversity Crisis Poverty Crisis Energy War Crisis
Pollution Crisis
Thank you
www.renewables100.org
Solutions for a 100% RE future