http://www.coursesites.com/s/_LDC

The 2nd International Learning Design Challenge will begin at

13.00 UTC/GMT

Professor Diana Laurillard Dr. Patricia Charlton

Dr. Eileen Kennedy

Joanna Wild

Dionisis Dimakopoulos

#LDChallenge

Welcome and introductions to the team

Summary of the results of the 1st Challenge week

Reflections on the review process - views from participants

The design, submit, and review process - a brief recap

Example reviews from the Learning Designer:

http://web.lkldev.ioe.ac.uk/LD/

How to keep in touch during the week:

Q & A discussion forum on Coursesites

email to learningdesignercommunity@gmail.com

Twitter @LDtool or #LDChallenge

2nd ChallengeAgenda Day 1

1st ChallengeSelected outcomes

60 new designs created

40 designs reviewed

0-4 hours 5-7 hours 8-10 hours

11-15 hours

<150%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Time spent by participants on Challenge activities

What is the value of the Learning Designer?

Challenge process- good to focus on one tool- fast and dynamic pace with daily activities - one-week duration- live sessions as well as recordings

LD toolBrowser – being able to share designs rapidlyDesigner – pie chart; categories of learning types; estimating timeReviewing – giving feedback; receiving feedback

Good points

Challenge process- shorter live sessions- meet the community- summarise main points- include a weekend- focus on one central point with links…

LD toolBrowser - tagging system to search topic, level, context, outcomeDesigner – provide for collaborative designReviewing – provide for conversation between author and reviewer

- assign reviewers

Suggestions for improvements

Data from the 1st Learning Design Challenge, Feb 2014

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

Can’t sayNot at all applicableNot Very applicable Fairly applicableHighly applicable

I developed new ideas and had valuable insights about my teaching practice which were prompted by…

N = 47

Could it change teaching practice?

Data from the 1st Learning Design Challenge, Feb 2014

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

Can’t sayNot at all applicableNot Very applicable Fairly applicableHighly applicable

I developed new ideas and had valuable insights about my teaching practice which were prompted by…

N = 47

It's quite disappointing if you work on your LD, then try hard to do good review for someone else, and no-one is reviewing yours.

Many were not reviewed

Could it change teaching practice?

Reflections on the review process

Valuable processWhat I like the most is feedback I've received - it was totally new for me to have really external review. I like also the process of giving feedback. It took me 3 hours but I've taken into consideration so many things and criteria provided on the course - I've learnt a lot!

Getting feedback from peers, helping me over organisational blindness

Lack of collaborative editing of learning designsthe tool should promote collaborative editing... We found we discussed and negotiated many issues in the final presentation and in some reviews. Collaborative editing could help the teachers to work directly together in adjusting a group-design

Lack of place for interaction between the author and the reviewerWe switched to email… doing the review of another design it is also important to have the opportunity to exchange with the other participant, and then reflect together.

Recap: Design – Submit – ReviewDesignUse the Browser to select an existing designView it in the Designer to decide if you want to use itIf so, click on Edit, and change whatever parts of it you need toORGo straight to the Designer to create your own

SubmitIn the Designer, click on Share (save url)Go to Browser – Personal space – My designsScroll down to new design and click (tick appears on the right)Click on the ‘bookmark’ at the top to place it in your ‘public space’ folderClick on ‘My submissions for the challenge’ and click Add

ReviewIn the Browser click on Designs not reviewed yet – Priority for reviewClick on one and in the Designer Turn editing onAdd TLA and use this to give comments in terms of the criteriaShare your Review in the same was as submitting a design, but to ‘My reviews’