HTRW

download HTRW

of 17

Transcript of HTRW

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    1/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 1/17

    HOW TO INCREASE HEAT TRANSFER AND REDUCE WATERWALL

    TUBE FAILURE IN HIGH PRESSURE BOILERS

    Dr. Pradeep Jain -DGM, NETRA- R&D, NTPC Limited,

    ABSTRACT:In spite of maintaining the very good water chemistry in water / steam cycle of thermal power plant,

    corrosion phenomena takes place in the boilers. The product of corrosion in the feed water system

    transported into the boiler and gets deposited on the internal surface of waterwall tubes. It leads to

    overheating and On-load corrosion and ultimately tube failure. To achieve the almost zero tube failure

    in waterwall of high pressure boilers, post-operational chemical cleaning is essential at the frequent

    intervals in the life span of power plant which will improve heat transfer and reduce under deposit on-

    load corrosion. This paper will discuss the phenomena of localised corrosion, its remedial measures to

    achieve near zero tube failure.

    INTRODUCTION

    The NTPC Limited has more than 125 numbers of fossils fired, sub critical, high pressure boilers ranging

    from 100 to 190 kg/cm2. The saturation temperature of boiler water varies from 250 370 C depending

    upon the boiler pressure. The capacity of these boilers varies from 60 MW to 500 MW, whereas the

    heat flux varies from 200-300 KW/m2. These boilers are generally drum type and a few once through

    types. Waterwall tubes of these boilers are made of carbon steel or low alloy steel. Dematerializedwater is used in these boilers with proper boiler water treatment generally recommended by Original

    Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). Generally Non volatile treatment (NVT) i.e. TSP is used in most of the

    boiler to maintain the pH except a few boilers where, all volatile treatment (AVT) chemicals is used. Due

    to On-load corrosion in low pressure parts, condenser and heat exchangers of boilers, deposition of

    corrosion products and salt concentration takes place on the internal surface of waterwall tubes. Ingress

    of raw water due to condenser leaks into the feed water also increases the salt deposition and oxygen

    concentration on internal surface due to boiling. The condenser of 500 MW generators can contain

    300 miles of tubing and approx. 50000 tube-to-tube-plate joints, so some in-leakage of the external

    cooling water is inevitable from time to time. Thermal conductivity of this deposit is very low (about 2

    W/m/C) in comparison of carbon steel (about 50 W/mC), thus significantly reduces the heat transfer

    and increases the outer metal temperature. Frequent tube failure has been observed in old boilers

    ran more than 100,000 hours due to internal localised corrosion. Tube failure investigation indicated

    that the main reason of waterwall tube failure is either due to hydrogen damage or caustic corrosion or

    overheating or the effect of all. Some of the case histories experienced in different capacities boilers

    of State Electricity Boards as well as NTPC Ltd. along with their remedial measures to attain zero tube

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    2/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 2/17

    failure have been discussed in this paper.

    How mild steel corrodes in boiler water

    Waterwall tubes in most of the fossil-fired boiler are made of carbon steel. In pure DM water, or in very

    dilute acid or alkaline solutions at boiler temperature, it normally corrodes very slowly to form the black

    iron oxide known as magnetite (Fe3O

    4). The overall reaction is:

    3 Fe + 4 H2O ------- Fe

    3O

    4+ 4 H

    2

    The corrosion rate is dependent by the rate at which the reactant (water) can reach the metal surface

    and the reaction product can leave the surface. In nearly neutral solutions, magnetite is very slightly

    soluble and it deposits as coherent and tenacious surface film, which greatly impedes this two-waychemical traffic. The transport processes are dominated by slow state diffusion through the oxide

    layer and the corrosion rate is virtually independent of solution composition. The corrosion rate is also

    diminishes with time as the oxide thickness grows. Even after years of exposure, the layer is no more

    than a few microns thick.

    In more alkaline or more acid solutions, magnetite becomes increasingly soluble and precipitates in

    a different physical form. Instead of yielding a strongly coherent film, it has a more porous structure.

    Soluble species can now diffuse relatively rapidly through the film and the corrosion rate is much

    faster, although it still falls off the time as the oxide accumulated. The deposition of salts and corrosion

    products observed in different waterwall tubes has shown in the photograph no.1-4.

    Photograph no.1 & 2 showing waterwall tubes of 60 MW boilers having a very thick deposit ranging

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    3/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 3/17

    thickness 1.0-1.5 mm.

    Photograph no. 3 & 4 showing a waterwall tube of 200 & 110 MW boilers having a thick iron oxide as

    well as hardness salt deposition which is non uniform in nature.

    Regions of Heat Transfer in Boi lers

    Both recirculating drum type boilers and once-through boilers are in use in NTPC. Drum type boiler

    consists of three separate components: an evaporator (waterwall area), where water is converted to a

    steam-water mixture: a drum, in which two phases are separated and a super heater. A once-throughboiler, on the other hand, is a single unit with sub-cooled (below the boiling point at that pressure) water

    entering at one end and superheated steam leaving at the other end. Because of its lower capital cost,

    the once-through type is becoming more popular and now NTPC is going for 660 MW super critical

    once-through boilers.

    The various regions of heat transfer in a once-through boiler tube, with uniform heat flux, are shown in

    Figure-1.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    4/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 4/17

    Figure-1Showing water-steam formation in waterwall tube.

    Of the six different heat transfer regions, five are usually present in a recirculation boiler (the exception

    is the dryout / post-dryout regions. dryout should not occur in recirculation boilers, but is possible if the

    flow in a tube is reduced for any reason, or if one or more adjacent tubes are plugged).

    At the inlet, both wall and liquid are below saturation temperature and heating is by convection. At some

    point along the tube, the wall temperature exceeds the saturation temperature and bubbles are formed

    on the wall, although the bulk liquid temperature is below saturation. This is the region of sub-cooled

    nucleate boiling. (Continuing along the tube, the region of saturated nucleate boiling, where the bulk

    liquid temperature reaches saturation, is then enters).

    As more steam is formed, small bubbles coalesce to form large bubbles (slug flow). Eventually, these

    combine to give a central core of steam and leave an annular flow of water along the wall. Further

    along the tube, the liquid film on the wall becomes sufficiently thin for convective heat transfer to the

    liquid surface coupled with direct evaporation to become the only means of heat transfer, because

    this method of heat transfer is highly efficient, nucleation of bubbles at the wall ceases through lack of

    sufficient superheat. At the same time, increasing steam velocity results in entrainment of liquid in the

    form of droplets. Depletion of the liquid film by evaporation and droplet formation eventually results in

    complete dryout of the tube wall.

    A dramatic increase in wall temperature occurs at the dryout point. In the post-dryout region heat

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    5/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 5/17

    transfer is by convection in the steam phase, the droplets gradually disappearing by evaporation. At

    low heat fluxes direct impingement of droplets on to the wall may also occur. Evaporation of all droplets

    finally produces single phase superheated conditions.

    WATER CHEMISTRY

    Impurities and additives present in water fed to high pressure boilers are controlled within closely

    defined limits for two very good reasons.

    (1) To reduce corrosion in the water-steam circuits to a minimum under normal and fault

    conditions

    (2) To reduce transport of iron oxide, hardness salts, silica etc. into the boiler and turbine. These

    substances deposit out on the heat transfer surfaces and turbine blades.

    Accelerated corrosion in many regions of high pressure boilers is known to be brought about byconcentration of corrosive substances (chlorides, sulphates, hydroxides and phosphates) by boiling.

    The main water chemistry regimes used to reduce corrosion and transport of iron oxide etc. to a minimum

    are given in Table below together with the advantages and disadvantages of each regime.

    Regime Dissolved

    Oxygen level

    Protective

    oxide

    on tube

    surface

    Advantages Disadvantages

    All volatile

    treatment

    (0.5 ppm

    NH3)

    Low

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    6/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 6/17

    in Table, very strict limits are specified on the concentrations of many other substances. For example, in

    the case of a typical once-through boiler using all volatile treatment (AVT) water chemistry, upper limits

    for various substances under steady load conditions are as follows:

    Sodium 5 ppb Sulphate 2 ppb

    Chloride 2 ppb Silica 20 ppb

    N2H

    4 1.5 X O

    2(Min 10 ppb) Iron 5 ppb

    Cu + Ti 2 ppb

    CORROSION AND DEPOSITION IN VARIOUS HEAT TRANSFER REGIONS:

    Convective Heating region:

    In this region, at the inlet to a once through boiler, there have been no reported instances of tube failure

    owing to heat flux conditions. In the absence of boiling, the increase in corrosion rate should be small

    and related to the higher metal temperature and activation energy of the corrosion process in pure

    water. Studies on surfaces which have been oxidized under good water chemistry conditions show that

    even at high heat fluxes as high as 800 kW/m2, negligible amounts of sodium and chlorine are taken

    up from NaCl, NaOH, NaHSO4, Na

    2SO

    4and Na

    3PO

    4solutions. Some iron is deposited from Fe (OH)

    2,

    which is likely to be the initial form of iron produced by protective or aggressive corrosion under alkaline

    conditions.

    Nucleate boiling regions:

    Three types of situation are possible. Two of these are concerned with the formation of oxide deposits

    with different porosities on a tube surface and the effect of this on corrosion. In the first instance, all

    oxide is assumed to deposit from iron dissolved in solution and to form an oxide layer of low porosity

    (50%). The situation in a real boiler may lie anywhere between these two

    extremes. The third situation is concerned with boiling at defects on a tube surface.

    Oxide deposit of high porosi ty:

    Oxide of high porosity (>50%) is found to deposit in drum as well as once-through boilers under both

    low and high oxygen water chemistry conditions. The deposition rate is approx. proportional to the

    concentration of particulate iron oxide and the square of the heat flux. The best approximation to the

    real situation is given by

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    7/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 7/17

    D = k q2c t

    Where, D = amount of magnetite deposited (kg/m2)

    q = the heat flux (W/m2)

    c = concentration of iron in water (kg/m3)

    t = time (hour)

    k = constant ( approx. 5 X 10-13 / W2m2/s

    In a wick boiling mechanism, salts dissolved in the boiler water can be concentrated by factors > 104

    as shown in the figure-2.

    Generally, the protective magnetite scale thickness is 10-15 microns in the waterwall tube. When the

    corrosion rate increases due to upset of water chemistry parameters in boiler, (due to salt ingress and

    concentration), the deposit formation also increases due to corrosion of metal and precipitation of

    contaminants whose water solubility decreases at higher temperature on the evaporator tube surface.

    To maintain the pH in boiler water, in case of reduction of pH due to salt ingress, addition of more

    Tri Sodium Phosphate (TSP) is required. In this process, at some places on the internal surface of

    waterwall tubes, deposit thickness increases and the protective iron oxide scale becomes non protective

    and porous in nature. Porous, insulating types of deposits allow boiler water to diffuse into the deposit

    where the water becomes trapped and boils.

    The boiling of deposit in entrapped water produces relatively pure steam which tends to diffuse out of

    the deposit, leaving behind super heated non-boiling equilibrium solution of caustic, which is responsible

    for caustic corrosion or acidic solution, which is responsible of hydrogen damage in waterwall tubes as

    discussed below.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    8/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 8/17

    CAUSTIC CORROSION

    Figure-2showing salt concentration under the deposit by Wick boiling phenomena

    If the salt concentrated under the deposit is having high pH due to concentration of caustic from TSP

    dosing, it start dissolution of protective magnetite (Fe3O

    4) layer on the evaporator tube wall inner surface

    and form sodium ferrite (NaFeO2)and sodium ferroate (Na

    2FeO

    2) as shown in the equation.

    Fe3O

    4+ 4 NaOH ------- NaFeO

    2+ Na

    2FeO

    2+ 2 H

    2O

    Caustic corrosion has been shown in the photographs no.5 & 6. in waterwall tube of 200MW boilers.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    9/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 9/17

    ACIDIC CORROSION

    Solution of low pH is generated in high pressure boilers in two different ways:

    1. pH of the entire boiler water is reduced when contaminants which are acidic or becomes acidic

    when heated in to the boiler.

    2. The bulk boiler water remains alkaline but acidic solutions are generated within corrosion pits

    by the action of dissolved oxygen and chloride. The most common acid forming contaminant

    is sea water or a river water which is low in carbonate and sulphate. In the boiler, the acidity is

    increased locally to corrosive concentrations by boiling.

    In the acidic or highly alkaline conditions, iron reacts and hydrogen is liberated.

    Fe + 2 NaOH = Na2FeO

    2+ H

    2

    Fe + 2 HCl = FeCl2 + H

    2

    If the hydrogen is liberated in an atomic form, it is capable of diffusing into the steel. Some of this

    diffused, atomic hydrogen will combine at metal grain boundaries or inclusions to produce molecular

    hydrogen, or it will react with iron carbides in the metal to produce methane.

    Fe3C + 4 H = CH

    4+ 3 Fe

    Because neither molecular hydrogen nor methane is capable of diffusing through the steel, these gases

    accumulate, primarily at grain boundaries. Eventually, the gas pressure created will cause separation

    of the metal at its grain boundaries, forming discontinuous, intergranular micro cracks as shown in the

    micrograph-1.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    10/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 10/17

    Micrograph-1showing the fissures and cracks inside the metal due to hydrogen damage.

    As these micro cracks accumulate, tube strength diminishes until stresses imposed by the internal

    pressure exceed the tensile strength of the remaining, intact metal. At this point a thick-walled, longitudinal

    burst may occur depending on the extent of hydrogen damage as shown in photographs no. 7 & 8.

    Photographsno. 7 & 8, Waterwall tubes show the failure due to hydrogen damage due to localised

    acidic condition.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE FOR DEPOSIT ASSESSMENT IN WATERWALL

    TUBE

    Boiler tube sampling:

    Four waterwall tubes are cut from the four corner / sides of the high heat flux zone of the boilers, i.e.

    mainly from the uppermost portion of (2-3 meters above) burner zone. The tube sample are preparedas per ASTM D-3483, machined and cut longitudinally in two parts, one being the hot side (internal

    surfaces facing fire side) and the other, the cold side (internal surfaces facing remote side). Internal

    deposition from the samples is removed for chemical analysis mechanically by pressing the machined

    sample in a vice. The average quantity of internal deposits is calculated separately for both the sides

    from the difference between sample tube weights, measured before and after the deposits are removed

    chemically.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    11/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 11/17

    Deposit quantity assessment:

    Waterwall tube samples are collected from site and machined on the outer surface. The outer machined

    surface of the tube is painted with corrosion resistant lacquer. The internal surface area (A, in cm2)

    is measured and the initial weight (W1

    , in mg) of the tube samples is measured. The waterwall tube

    sample is cleaned in 5% inhibited hydrochloric acid solvent at 65 C and put on a magnetic stirrer till the

    deposit is removed completely from the internal surfaces. Then it is washed with demineralised water

    and an alkaline solution and dipped in a surface passivation solution for 5-10 minutes. The final weight

    of the sample (W2, in mg) is measured. The quantity of internal deposit (DQ, in mg.cm2) is calculated

    by the following formula.

    W1 W

    2

    DQ = ---------------

    A

    CRITARIA FOR CHEMICAL CLEANING

    Chemical cleaning of a boiler is suggested on the basis of the quantity of intenal deposit present in the

    waterwall tubes of the boiler. When the quantity of deposit exceeds 40 mg/cm2, the tube surfaces are

    considered to be very dirty surfaces as per the Indian Standard 10391-1998 and the chemical cleaning

    is suggested to improve the heat transfer and reduce the overheating. The guidelines are given in

    Table-1.

    Table-1showing limits of deposit quantity allowed in waterwall tubes at different pressure.

    The deposit quantity measured in high pressure boilers of different site are given here along with the

    trend chart and recommendations for chemical cleaning.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    12/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 12/17

    A List of NTPC boilers in which chemical cleaning carr ied out under the

    supervision of NTPC (R&D)

    1. Ramagundam, Boiler # 1, 200 MW Oct. 19982. Ramagundam, Boiler # 2, 200 MW Sept. 1999

    3. Ramagundam, Boiler # 3, 200 MW July 2000

    4. Tanda, Boiler # 1, 110 MW June 2000

    5. Tanda, Boiler # 2, 110 MW Feb. 2002

    6. Tanda, Boiler # 3, 110 MW Jan. 2001

    7. Tanda, Boiler # 4, 110 MW Aug. 2002

    8. Talcher Thermal, Boiler # 1, 60 MW Dec. 1995

    9. Talcher Thermal, Boiler # 2, 60 MW Feb. 1996

    10. Talcher Thermal, Boiler # 3, 60 MW June 200211. Talcher Thermal, Boiler # 4, 60 MW May 2000

    12. Badarpur, Boiler, #1 95 MW Dec. 2006

    13. Badarpur, Boiler # 3 95 MW Oct. 2004

    14. Badarpur, Boiler # 2 95 MW Nov. 2004

    15. Badarpur, Boiler #4 210 MW Aug. 2006

    16. Korba, Boiler #1 200 MW Oct. 2007

    17. Singrauli, Boiler #3 200 MW April 2008

    18 . Tanda, Boiler # 3, 110 MW May 2008

    19. Vindhyachal, Boiler # 1, 210 MW May 2008

    20. Farakka, Boiler #3 200 MW July 2008

    21. Ramagundam, Boiler #3 200 MW Aug. 2008

    22. Unchhahar, Boiler #1 210 MW Aug. 2008

    23. Rihand, Boiler #1 500 MW Sept. 2008

    24. Ramagundam, Boiler #1 200 MW Sept. 2008

    25. Vindhyachal, Boiler # 2 210 MW Oct. 2008

    26. Vindhyachal, Boiler # 4 210 MW May 2009

    27. Kahalgaon, Boiler # 4 210 MW May 2009

    28. Farakka, Boiler # 2 200 MW May 2009

    CONCLUSIONS

    Failure investigation studies of waterwall tubes of different capacity boilers indicated the reasons of

    tube failure are:

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    13/17

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    14/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 14/17

    4. David E. Hendrik, Hydrogen attack on waterwall tubes in a high pressure boiler, Material

    Performance, Aug. 1995, pp-46-51.

    5. C. Syrett, Corrosion in fossils fuel power plant, EPRI, USA

    6. L. Tomlinson and A.M. Pritchard, Effects of heat flux on corrosion of high pressure boilers, Br.

    corrosion J., 1985, vol.20, No.4, pp-187-195.

    7. R.D. Port, Identification of corrosion damage in boilers, Material Performance, Dec. 1994, pp

    45-51.

    8. G.M.W. Mann, History and causes of On-load water side corrosion in power plants, Br.Corrosion J., 1977, vol. 12 No.1, pp 7-14.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Dr. Pradeep Jain, M.Sc., MBA, Ph.D. (Chemistry)

    4 years experience in O&M, Water Chemistry at Thermal Power plants, Satpura and Korba

    (MPEB) from 1982-86.

    Joined NTPC (R&D) in 1986 and having 23 years of work experience at in thefield of water

    chemistry and corrosion studies in High pressure Boilers, Turbines and Generators of power

    plants.

    Specialized in the field of Post-operational chemical cleaning of high-pressure boilers and

    condensers.

    Carried out solvent selection studies and supervised post-operational chemical cleaning of 35

    nos. of NTPC and 06 numbers of State Electricity Boilers and improve the heat transfer efficiency

    and heat rate in the range of 20-30 Kcal/kwh.

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    15/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 15/17

    Recently, he has visited to Fujairah water and power plant, UAE to find out the Root cause

    Failure in evaporator tubes in HRSGs. It is an international consultancy work through NTPC

    - International consultancy group.

    Working in the field of void fraction measurement and thermal monitoring in waterwall tubes to

    measure the heat flux, internal deposit and steam water ratio.

    Published research papers in national and international journals andfile two patents for void

    fraction measurement techniques.

    Presently working as Deputy General Manager, NETRA-R&D

    Supporting Tables:

    Table-2, Badarpur uni t no. 1 was chemically c leaned once in Dec. 2006

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    16/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 16/17

    Table-3, Badarpur unit no. 2 was chemically cleaned once in Nov. 2004

    Table-4, Badarpur unit no. 3 was chemically cleaned once in Oct.. 2004

  • 8/13/2019 HTRW

    17/17

    Pradeep Jain 3.1- 17/17

    Table-5, Badarpur unit no. 4 was chemically cleaned once in Aug. 2006

    Table-6, Badarpur unit no. 5, two stage chemical c leaning recommended in Dec. 2005